Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

darklucius    

darklucius Avatar Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to darklucius Block darklucius Invite darklucius to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Consoles Owned: PC, PS2, Genesis
Video Games Played: TOO MANY
Date Signed Up:2/19/2012
Last Login:7/26/2012
Location:spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaccccceeee
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 292 total,  305 ,  13
Comment Thumbs: 1484 total,  2107 ,  623
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 29 Content: Peasant → Level 30 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 84% (84/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:11268
Total Comments Made:980
FJ Points:1925
No.

latest user's comments

#6 - lol 05/31/2012 on wooden toaster 0
#185 - lolwat 05/31/2012 on What happened? 0
#172 - Just make sure it is safe for Mr. Bigglesworth too!  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2012 on What happened? +1
User avatar #174 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
But Mr. Bigglesworth is such a, how do you call them? Oh yes!

A tool.
User avatar #185 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
lolwat
#2 - who makes these? I saw one for fluttershy too...  [+] (5 new replies) 05/31/2012 on wooden toaster 0
User avatar #3 - thundercloud (05/31/2012) [-]
[url deleted]
User avatar #7 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
thanks for the awesome sauce there bro... XD
User avatar #8 - thundercloud (05/31/2012) [-]
go on deviant art
User avatar #9 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
will do
User avatar #6 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
lol
#169 - fans of any particular classification of music can be any age.…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/31/2012 on What happened? 0
User avatar #171 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
As was I... oh well, you have bested me sir. I shall go into the cryo tube for another 300 years or so...
#172 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
Just make sure it is safe for Mr. Bigglesworth too!
User avatar #174 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
But Mr. Bigglesworth is such a, how do you call them? Oh yes!

A tool.
User avatar #185 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
lolwat
#2 - WHAT THE ACTUAL **** IS GOING ON WITH THESE ELECT…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Simple explanation of... +5
#3 - ClicheUsername (05/31/2012) [-]
The whole idea, or at least one theory of quantum mechanics, states that the electrons act as both a wave and a particle at the same time, known as wave-particle duality. It is not until the electron is observed that the wave-function collapses and it is then determined whether it is traveling as a wave or a particle.

A good one to think of it is to take a marble and place it under 1 of 3 cups. Now, a person comes up and does not know what cup the marble is under. So, technically, the marble (particle) is occupying all three of the cups (wave) in a superposition state, meaning it is taking on all possibilities that it can have. Now, pick one cup up and reveal that the marble is not under it. This observation causes the wave-function, or the probability of how the particle (marble) is acting to collapse and become more precise. Pick up another cup and find that the marble is or is not under that cup and the wave-function collapses even more until it is completely defined.

Another good way to think of this is to put it on another macroscopic scale. Image looking straight forward. Now, it is common to believe that everything that is behind you and you cannot see is still there, even though you cannot see it. However, in a quantum mechanics perspective, you do not know if the things behind you are there or not and you will not be able to tell until you either look behind you, hear something behind you or feel something behind you. This verifies that it truly is there or else we just common accept that it is.
User avatar #88 - dicocito (06/01/2012) [-]
These experiments are better know as the Schrodinger's cat experiment .
User avatar #67 - HARDSTYLESHUFFLER (06/01/2012) [-]
Now, I haven't taken basic physics yet, seeing as how I just finished my sophomore year in high school, but would the Schrodinger's cat experiment be similar to this? I don't mean so much as in the difference of the wave and particle, but that the cat is both alive and dead. I don't really know anything to do with physics or quantum mechanics, so please correct if me I am wrong, which I most likely am. lol
#92 - ClicheUsername (06/01/2012) [-]
If you are going to take basic physics, you are most likely only going to concern yourself with Newtonian physics which includes kinematics (gravity, forces and movement), maybe some point charges and waves. This form of physics is considered more modern as it was really discovered in the 1900s by Einstein and Neils Bohr.

Anywho, for Schrodinger cat, the same idea can be applied.

In Schrodingers theoretical experiment, a cat is placed in a box that contains a vial of poison. If the vial breaks, the cat will die instantaneously and we do not know if the vial will break or will not, it is completely random. Now since the cat is inside the box with vial, we can not observe the cat, so it is technically alive AND dead at the same time to us because we can not make a definite conclusion. This puts the cat in a state of superposition where it is taking on all possibilities that it can. After opening the box and observing that the vial broke, we would find the cat dead and the wave-function of the cat would collapse to one definite answer. On the other hand, we could open the box and find the vial intact and the cat alive, thus causing the wave-function of the cat to collapse in the other direction.

These examples and theoretical experiments all do the job of taking the quantum world that we cannot see and puts it on a level that we understand and that we are familiar with.

Quantum Physics is definitely a very interesting subject and I can go on and on about it. All the theories of Quantum Mechanics are pretty interesting and have many valid arguments that can be believed, but no one theory has yet to cover it all.
User avatar #96 - HARDSTYLESHUFFLER (06/01/2012) [-]
It seems that ever since this science channel popped up, everyone is showing their true intelligence.

Anyway, thanks for answering my question with a well explained answer.
#98 - ClicheUsername (06/01/2012) [-]
No problem. Im glad to see that I can explain it well since I will be student teaching next Fall in a Physics classroom. I doubt we will get into this stuff but you never know.
#28 - jonbiro (05/31/2012) [-]
I do not believe that is an accurate example. I'm not arguing just trying to comprehend what you stated was that it is common to believe since we do not know what cup the marble is in it is in all of them but what the video is showing is that it is a wave without observation meaning that both are possible, but your statement is just a measure of chance.
#93 - ClicheUsername (06/01/2012) [-]
You need to toss the idea of chance out the window when dealing with Quantum Mechanics on a macroscopic level. The example using a marble and cups was just to try and explain the video in a way that we can be more familiar with as most of us have not completed a double slit experiment.
#165 - So you didn't have a college education when you were ten and m…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/31/2012 on What happened? 0
User avatar #168 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ah, but you were talking about JB fans! They are anywhere from 10 to 15!
#169 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
fans of any particular classification of music can be any age. I was just stating the most common age for JB fans.
User avatar #171 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
As was I... oh well, you have bested me sir. I shall go into the cryo tube for another 300 years or so...
#172 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
Just make sure it is safe for Mr. Bigglesworth too!
User avatar #174 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
But Mr. Bigglesworth is such a, how do you call them? Oh yes!

A tool.
User avatar #185 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
lolwat
#1 - That's probably because you use a browser that checks whatever…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2012 on wtf facebook? +3
User avatar #2 - thetwoofclubs (05/31/2012) [-]
Also, sometimes the browser is checking for capitalization.
#159 - Were you born in the 1600s?  [+] (8 new replies) 05/31/2012 on What happened? 0
User avatar #160 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
Actually, the 1700s. Though, the college education came when I was 12.
#165 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
So you didn't have a college education when you were ten and my point still stands correct! HA!
User avatar #168 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ah, but you were talking about JB fans! They are anywhere from 10 to 15!
#169 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
fans of any particular classification of music can be any age. I was just stating the most common age for JB fans.
User avatar #171 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
As was I... oh well, you have bested me sir. I shall go into the cryo tube for another 300 years or so...
#172 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
Just make sure it is safe for Mr. Bigglesworth too!
User avatar #174 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
But Mr. Bigglesworth is such a, how do you call them? Oh yes!

A tool.
User avatar #185 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
lolwat
#146 - Since when is it "rebellious" to get an education? L…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/31/2012 on What happened? +5
User avatar #158 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
Yes, yes I did.
User avatar #159 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
Were you born in the 1600s?
User avatar #160 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
Actually, the 1700s. Though, the college education came when I was 12.
#165 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
So you didn't have a college education when you were ten and my point still stands correct! HA!
User avatar #168 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ah, but you were talking about JB fans! They are anywhere from 10 to 15!
#169 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
fans of any particular classification of music can be any age. I was just stating the most common age for JB fans.
User avatar #171 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
As was I... oh well, you have bested me sir. I shall go into the cryo tube for another 300 years or so...
#172 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
Just make sure it is safe for Mr. Bigglesworth too!
User avatar #174 - commontroll (05/31/2012) [-]
But Mr. Bigglesworth is such a, how do you call them? Oh yes!

A tool.
User avatar #185 - darklucius (05/31/2012) [-]
lolwat
#224 - When I saw this it was in the middle, so I read it as "li… 05/30/2012 on L4D 0
#227 - satanisthesavior. lol  [+] (6 new replies) 05/29/2012 on xXFrostyXx's profile 0
User avatar #228 - xXFrostyXx (05/31/2012) [-]
Use TOR so you don't get banned.
User avatar #229 - darklucius (06/01/2012) [-]
TOR?
User avatar #230 - xXFrostyXx (06/01/2012) [-]
It's a web browser that hides you under 3 proxies, so it's hard to get caught.
User avatar #231 - darklucius (06/01/2012) [-]
lol k
User avatar #232 - xXFrostyXx (06/01/2012) [-]
How have you been?
User avatar #233 - darklucius (06/01/2012) [-]
Good, I guess. Lots of shit going on at work though. Just lost two people because the district manager said they were "stealing". We managed to hire someone new to replace one of the people who got fired, but the other one was an assistant manager. Basically, you need a manager (either the store manager or an assistant manager) there during all store hours, and since we just lost one of the three people here who could do that, it means we have to keep bringing in managers from other stores until we get a new one because the two we have left can't cover all the hours (the store is open from 9am to 9pm every day of the week). And every single one of those other managers from different stores has a different way of doing things. It's a goddamned clusterfuck. That's in addition to the regular bullshit we have to put up with such as getting told to do something, then getting told to put it back the way it was the next day and getting sent way more product than what we sell causing us to end up with a ton of it left just sitting in the back because it just wont fit on the shelves. And unfortunately, my boss gets responsibility for all that shit going wrong but doesn't actually have the authority to do anything about it.

Seriously, I'm pretty sure the district manager just hates the particular store I work at and is trying her best to fuck everything up to the point that the corporate end of the company decides to close our location.

And somehow, despite this poor upper management, Dollar Tree is #373 on the Fortune 500 list... money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2012/full_list/301_400.html
#468 - lol k 05/25/2012 on Shitstorms in FJ 0
#210 - That does not matter. The church is allowed to regulate itself… 05/24/2012 on Shitstorm ahead 0
#204 - So don't let them get married in a church. The church is a rel…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Shitstorm ahead +1
User avatar #205 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
But gays also want the right to be married in a religious institution. How equal would it be to tell them no?
User avatar #210 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
That does not matter. The church is allowed to regulate itself as long as it operates within the confines of the law. You do not have to follow any particular religion, so if there is a religion that persecutes you then maybe it is time to find a new religion to follow. That's what I did.

Maybe they should join Satanism. Most tolerant religion I've found so far. :3
#186 - Like I said, it's not that it's more important, it's that ther…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Shitstorm ahead +1
User avatar #199 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
Separation of Church and State isn't officially a doctrine of the US govt. It is simply the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by the court. There is a consistent ruling in almost all cases to separate the affairs of the state from the affairs of the church.

Marriage is an institution of the state. Therefore, when a gay couple wants to be married in a church, the problem arises.
User avatar #204 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
So don't let them get married in a church. The church is a religion establishment, which is separate from the state. The fact that the state has a legal definition of marriage as well is where the problem arises, because people apparently can't figure out that there's a difference between legal marriage and religious marriage...
User avatar #205 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
But gays also want the right to be married in a religious institution. How equal would it be to tell them no?
User avatar #210 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
That does not matter. The church is allowed to regulate itself as long as it operates within the confines of the law. You do not have to follow any particular religion, so if there is a religion that persecutes you then maybe it is time to find a new religion to follow. That's what I did.

Maybe they should join Satanism. Most tolerant religion I've found so far. :3
#173 - Also, I would wager that a lot of people who are having money … 05/24/2012 on Shitstorm ahead +1
#170 - Pretty sure the poverty line is falling actually... I mean, I …  [+] (6 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Shitstorm ahead +1
User avatar #175 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
It's not. The number of children receiving sponsored lunches at school is at an all time high. That is the general indicator of the poverty line. The whole world's a mess. Why are gay rights more important than anything else? That's my bottom line. They deserve to be equal, but at what cost?
User avatar #186 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
Like I said, it's not that it's more important, it's that there are way too many people talking about it. Popularity does not equal importance. Gay rights is a popular topic, not an important one. However, when it comes to media, the more popular topics are the ones they choose to talk about.

I just don't see why there is still debate over this. Separation of church and state: It doesn't matter if gay rights is against your religion, that shouldn't affect the government. At all.
User avatar #199 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
Separation of Church and State isn't officially a doctrine of the US govt. It is simply the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by the court. There is a consistent ruling in almost all cases to separate the affairs of the state from the affairs of the church.

Marriage is an institution of the state. Therefore, when a gay couple wants to be married in a church, the problem arises.
User avatar #204 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
So don't let them get married in a church. The church is a religion establishment, which is separate from the state. The fact that the state has a legal definition of marriage as well is where the problem arises, because people apparently can't figure out that there's a difference between legal marriage and religious marriage...
User avatar #205 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
But gays also want the right to be married in a religious institution. How equal would it be to tell them no?
User avatar #210 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
That does not matter. The church is allowed to regulate itself as long as it operates within the confines of the law. You do not have to follow any particular religion, so if there is a religion that persecutes you then maybe it is time to find a new religion to follow. That's what I did.

Maybe they should join Satanism. Most tolerant religion I've found so far. :3
#327 - wait, that was a joke? I thought you were being serious... … 05/24/2012 on Shitstorms in FJ +1
#1 - Comment deleted 05/24/2012 on 3RR0R +1
#319 - Nope. Am enjoying my third year at college though :3 …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Shitstorms in FJ +2
#323 - Stevethewizard (05/24/2012) [-]
See? Make a joke, and smart people shrug it off. Thumbs for you, good sir.
#327 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
wait, that was a joke? I thought you were being serious...

I just shrug haters off by making it seem like I don't even give a fuck that they exist. Usually pisses them off even more, which is entertaining :3
#158 - True, however I think you're overlooking a big issue. All the …  [+] (9 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Shitstorm ahead +2
User avatar #167 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
True, it does take less money to improve gay rights. But what I'm saying is that it should be a lower priority while things like starvation, things that cause human suffering and death should receive more attention than Sally not being able to marry Stacy. Yes they should be able to marry, but the president should not be talking about something like this when people are losing their jobs and homes, and the poverty line is rising.
User avatar #173 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
Also, I would wager that a lot of people who are having money troubles are having them because they live beyond their means and rack up huge credit bills, then can't pay them. I'm sure there are exceptions, but from what I've seen personally this is usually the case. Americans in general are taught to spend ALL THE MONEY, even if you don't have it. That is what created this situation...
User avatar #170 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
Pretty sure the poverty line is falling actually... I mean, I know that the people who make the most money are earning a higher percentage, but overall everyone is earning more, at least since the last depression/recession happened (not sure if it was ever officially called a depression)...
User avatar #175 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
It's not. The number of children receiving sponsored lunches at school is at an all time high. That is the general indicator of the poverty line. The whole world's a mess. Why are gay rights more important than anything else? That's my bottom line. They deserve to be equal, but at what cost?
User avatar #186 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
Like I said, it's not that it's more important, it's that there are way too many people talking about it. Popularity does not equal importance. Gay rights is a popular topic, not an important one. However, when it comes to media, the more popular topics are the ones they choose to talk about.

I just don't see why there is still debate over this. Separation of church and state: It doesn't matter if gay rights is against your religion, that shouldn't affect the government. At all.
User avatar #199 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
Separation of Church and State isn't officially a doctrine of the US govt. It is simply the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by the court. There is a consistent ruling in almost all cases to separate the affairs of the state from the affairs of the church.

Marriage is an institution of the state. Therefore, when a gay couple wants to be married in a church, the problem arises.
User avatar #204 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
So don't let them get married in a church. The church is a religion establishment, which is separate from the state. The fact that the state has a legal definition of marriage as well is where the problem arises, because people apparently can't figure out that there's a difference between legal marriage and religious marriage...
User avatar #205 - housted (05/24/2012) [-]
But gays also want the right to be married in a religious institution. How equal would it be to tell them no?
User avatar #210 - darklucius (05/24/2012) [-]
That does not matter. The church is allowed to regulate itself as long as it operates within the confines of the law. You do not have to follow any particular religion, so if there is a religion that persecutes you then maybe it is time to find a new religion to follow. That's what I did.

Maybe they should join Satanism. Most tolerant religion I've found so far. :3
#1 - Comment deleted 05/24/2012 on how to get rid of the fear... -1
#22 - skip rape and go right to awkward cuddling? 05/24/2012 on kids toys nowadays 0
#56 - because piracy. They think requiring a constant connection to … 05/24/2012 on Diablo 3 errors like a boss +1

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #22 - drvvatson (07/29/2012) [-]
Hey, watsonthewise here. I lost my old profile due to password recovery failure so im just adding all my old friends again.
User avatar #20 - bosskiss (07/11/2012) [-]
here is a guide that may help you with your audio output problems[just follow the steps]

You need to login to view this link 0PConvertible.aspx

also if none of this works can you provide me with some of your laptop specs
User avatar #21 to #20 - darklucius (07/11/2012) [-]
I already tried messing with all the options I could find on my computer. Nothing made them any louder. I think the problem is that the speakers I'm trying to use aren't amplified.

I do have speakers that are amplified, and they work great, but they aren't exactly portable either... Having a smaller set that I can take with me is why I'm trying to figure out this problem...

Also, it's a Toshiba Sattelite P755. Not sure what other specs you need...
#17 - princedickfart Comment deleted by darklucius [-]
User avatar #19 to #17 - darklucius (05/21/2012) [-]
Imma delete this so princedickfart don't get banned (in case anyone rolls it), but if anyone requests it here on my profile I'll repost it...
User avatar #5 - AwesomeJT (05/03/2012) [-]
im guessing either your a gay or another retarded little bitch
User avatar #6 to #5 - darklucius (05/03/2012) [-]
Neither actually. Straight and intelligent. Not sure what sexuality has to do with that though.

I should probably leave this site though. All the retards get butthurt when I start slinging intelligent comments around.
User avatar #7 to #6 - AwesomeJT (05/03/2012) [-]
yea funnyjunk isn't good for people who...you kno have an opinion, try 9gag (in all seriousness) 9gag i think is more open to that kind of stuff
User avatar #8 to #7 - darklucius (05/03/2012) [-]
You know, it's kinda fun here. Pissing off all the opinionated little retards. Watching them roll around in their own **** because they think thumbing someone down means they won an argument. Rather entertaining.
User avatar #9 to #8 - AwesomeJT (05/03/2012) [-]
lol it actually is, but um your kinda doing that same thumb thing O_o
#10 to #9 - darklucius (05/03/2012) [-]
By celestia... you're right. I take back any negative thumbs I gave you for the duration of our conversation...
User avatar #11 to #10 - AwesomeJT (05/03/2012) [-]
its fine, i need to stay out of front page anyways xD, everytime i go there something bad happens....
#12 to #11 - darklucius (05/03/2012) [-]
>mfw 99% of the things people post on this site
>mfw 99% of the things people post on this site
#13 to #12 - AwesomeJT (05/03/2012) [-]
its more (just made this so it sucks, kinda liek windows 7 paint)
User avatar #4 - lazaman (04/28/2012) [-]
If you want the Disks, Gonna need an adress. Deleted mah Post.
User avatar #2 - redwolfradolf (03/28/2012) [-]
Your profil pic made me lol.
#3 to #2 - darklucius (03/28/2012) [-]
/squee
/squee
User avatar #1 - darklucius (02/19/2012) [-]
lolwat
 Friends (0)