darcabyss's latest comments at FunnyJunk

darcabyss

Rank #2422 on Comments

Offline

Send mail to darcabyss Block darcabyss Invite darcabyss to be your friend

Last status update:	-

Personal Info
Date Signed Up:	6/22/2013
Last Login:	1/14/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:	#2422
Highest Content Rank:	#7365
Highest Comment Rank:	#341
Content Thumbs:	16 total, 39 , 23
Comment Thumbs:	19467 total, 20164 , 697
Content Level Progress:	30.5% (18/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:	63.3% (633/1000) Level 314 Comments: Wizard → Level 315 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:	0
Content Views:	6830
Times Content Favorited:	1 times
Total Comments Made:	2740
FJ Points:	14653

What people say about darcabyss

latest user's comments

#3 - "Before I splatter your innards all over that mountain ra…	10/28/2015 on Realeast	+52
#17 - Bad side, not getting to watch Ep. 6 till December, at best. I… [+] (1 new reply)	10/28/2015 on Perfectly Calm	0
#25 - phantomcancer (10/28/2015) [-] Since Hellsing Abridged is made from the Hellsing Ultimate anime, which only has 8 episodes, it's more of a spring to the finish line more than an increase in production. Still stoked to see the next 3 episodes.
#119 - Yeah, Sasuke is awesome. He should give himself a round of app… [+] (2 new replies)	10/28/2015 on Skeltal Armor	+2
#120 - sebring (10/28/2015) [-] I don't get it #170 - arroway (10/28/2015) [-]
#3 - Apparently more information will come out in November. …	10/24/2015 on The wait is on	+3
#6 - *darcabyss used "roll 1, cah answer"* **darcabyss rolls…	10/24/2015 on Astrosphinx	+7
#11 - "I see your point. And that pine cone."	10/23/2015 on oh fuck faces	+7
#2 - I want the cool jewels one, and I don't really like using ice cubes.	10/22/2015 on Cool Shit	0
#8 - Comment deleted [+] (1 new reply)	10/21/2015 on calling all cosplayers...	0
#14 - mooncakes Comment deleted by darcabyss
#2 - *darcabyss used "roll picture"* **darcabyss rolled ima… [+] (2 new replies)	10/21/2015 on Because using hands are to...	+3
#17 - malachitecobra (10/22/2015) [-] DEUS VULT #9 - donkehfunker (10/21/2015) [-] FIGHT!
#4 - Wasn't this posted last year? And the year before that? [+] (10 new replies)	10/20/2015 on He's still here... for now	+13
#51 - rockamekishiko (10/21/2015) [-] doesn't say which year #29 - girlfromyourdreams (10/20/2015) [-] It was actually. #5 - imho (10/20/2015) [-] Considering it's from 2014 I doubt this was posted in 2013 #6 - eggsontoast (10/20/2015) [-] does't specify year. It's Oct 22 that is when he will die. #14 - imho (10/20/2015) [-] but he said "last year and the year before that" the latter would be 2013. So how was this posted in 2013? #39 - froot (10/20/2015) [-] implying you know shit about time travel #12 - anon (10/20/2015) [-] The post on 4chan reads10-01-14, you robot #13 - eggsontoast (10/20/2015) [-] That doesn't change anything, you duck. #102 - shinymew (10/21/2015) [-] I think Imho was talking about how this couldn't be posted 2013, which was implied from Darcabyss ("And the year before that?" meaning 2013), since it was first posted on 4chan in 2014, so it could only be reposted any year after 2013. #103 - eggsontoast (10/21/2015) [-] I was talking about the original post in the pic not so much of when it was capped. >The freeman will die Oct 22 That's what I'm talking about. I wasn't clear about the type of post and dates and looking back I miss read the comment anyway. So, eh. whatever.
#8 - You totally want a peace of dat ass. [+] (7 new replies)	10/20/2015 on Metal Gear Solid V Comp	+6
#11 - elijahg (10/20/2015) [-] Well Paz is of legal age if you want reassurance. #107 - anon (10/20/2015) [-] That and legal age varies with location. Hell, 18 isn't even the legal age for all of the US - it varies with each state from 16 to 18, with 18 just being the de facto "federal" standard that everybody uses to cover their ass. #28 - solidderking (10/20/2015) [-] i think she is only disguised as schoolgirl, she is actually 25 or so #37 - elijahg (10/20/2015) [-] Yeah, the whole innocent, peace-preaching/loving schoolgirl was a cover made by Cipher and Zero for her. Its directly stated in the Truth Tapes in MGSV TPP. #45 - fuzzyballs (10/20/2015) [-] Cipher and Zero is the same person #143 - elijahg (10/21/2015) [-] Zero is the leader of Cipher, Cipher is the orginization, which is later known as the Patriots. Listen to the tapes. However, due to Skullface, Zero is taken out of the picture and Cipher grows into the Patriots thanks to Anderson (SigInt). (Sorry, I don't know how to put that spoiler eye thing up) #144 - fuzzyballs (10/21/2015) [-] "Zero (real name David Oh, and formerly known as "O", Major Tom, Major Zero and Cipher) " I never liked double-enter guys
#73 - Huh. Image a T Rex with massive wings instead of tiny arms and…	10/19/2015 on door of your heart.	0
#8 - You burn your figurines in some sad attempt at a ritual to kil…	10/18/2015 on When some talks shit about...	0
#10 - I tried to get a job at my local Gamestop, but there were alwa…	10/17/2015 on I got a job today.	0
#7 - It was probably all Hades' fault.	10/15/2015 on Disney's Zombie Apocalypse	0
#38 - Halloween Whopper.	10/15/2015 on Cool AF	+14
#57 - Only way to beat him: Take the same character, claim he came f…	10/15/2015 on Cringe Battle	+1
#25 - I've had that stuff. It's pretty good. Probably wouldn't drink… [+] (3 new replies)	10/15/2015 on Cool AF	+31
#28 - clavatninenine (10/15/2015) [-] what the fuck did you eat to give yourself blue poo? #38 - darcabyss (10/15/2015) [-] Halloween Whopper. #32 - sakyle (10/15/2015) [-] Fierce blue cherry Gatorade did this to me. Subsequently I quit drinking it.
#19 - Eragon was a disappointment. [+] (63 new replies)	10/11/2015 on Holes	+272
#156 - anon (10/12/2015) [-] All right, real talk guys. If they were to do it right this time, who would you cast? I vote Liam Neeson as Brom Morgan Freeman as Ajihad Sean Beans as Galbatorix Lawrence Fishburne as one of the twins if not not both through movie magic I got nothing for the rest, maybe Jennifer Taylor for Saphira's voice. #155 - greatgranpapy has deleted their comment. #140 - chrishansenhater (10/12/2015) [-] Saw the movie before I read the books. It spoiled maybe about 10% of the story, that's how badly it was done. #112 - dzubelyudee (10/12/2015) [-] It's not too late for Eragon though. All they need to do is make it a tv series, GoT style. I reckon it would go down well. It would suit being a tv series way more. #109 - anon (10/12/2015) [-] The movie felt like someone took the cliff notes booklet on it and then summarized that and then summarized that and then did a movie on that. #85 - rochal (10/12/2015) [-] Yeah, it was pretty upsetting. It was my favorite book growing up and they completely butchered it, leaving so many plot holes/changing so many things that a sequel was impossible, and unwanted #84 - aejann (10/12/2015) [-] #63 - thevaulthunter (10/12/2015) [-] There was never an Eragon movie adaptation. Dragonball GT never existed. Silent Hills was never cancelled. The world is perfect. #179 - alarubra (10/27/2015) [-] GT, that's what you're going with. The anime series that brought Dragonball back to it's silly roots. Not Evolution, the shitty live action movie www.imdb.com/title/tt1098327/ #180 - thevaulthunter (10/27/2015) [-] Dragonball's silly roots were better. And that link doesn't go anywhere. #181 - alarubra (10/27/2015) [-] Does on my computer. And I agree the silly roots were better. Which is why I liked GT. That was my whole fucking point. #183 - thevaulthunter (10/27/2015) [-] I meant I thought its roots were better than GT. And maybe you can take a screenie of the page? #184 - alarubra (10/27/2015) [-] It's the imdb page for Dragonball: Evolution. #185 - thevaulthunter (10/27/2015) [-] "It's the imdb page for █████████████████████" ...? #164 - KazumaKyu (10/12/2015) [-] #72 - silentpaper (10/12/2015) [-] konami let kojima finish mgs5 #61 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Both the book and movie, yes. #160 - anon (10/12/2015) [-] the book was written by a 15 year old. Anyone who disagrees with you must be retarded or American. #132 - anon (10/12/2015) [-] I'll agree that the sequels went to shit, but the first book was solid. #102 - halor (10/12/2015) [-] The Eragon movie wasn't a disappointment it was a horrific attempt at making a movie much in the same vein as The Last Airbender...which doesn't exist , i honestly enjoyed the books up until the fight with Galbatorix which was honestly one of the worst ending fights i've read...Eragon, Arya, Murtagh and Nasuada all being ultra cockblocked at the end also annoyed me #149 - anon (10/12/2015) [-] That end though... So much build up just for Paolini to snap his fingers and say, "its' all done now bai". #148 - cadencee (10/12/2015) [-] Havent read the last book. Probably won't tbh, I enjoyed the first two books. Might leave it at that. #168 - halor (10/12/2015) [-] the Third book is alright, it's the 4th that has the disappointing ending #177 - cadencee (10/13/2015) [-] ahh I see. I read them back before even the third book came out so I didnt realise there were 4 aha. #182 - alarubra (10/27/2015) [-] I actually really liked the ending, and didn't see it as Deus Ex Machina (as I've seen people claim) or "its' all done now bai." Honestly, I think people just like bitching. The ending fight played out in the only way it rationally could have with the good guys winning, and there were hints as to how it would go from book 1. I would have liked a little more detail after the fight, as to how things went, but honestly, everything was wrapped up pretty succinctly, and it was already a huge book, and the fourth installment in a series that was supposed to be a strategy. And, no the good guys didn't all get a fairy tale romance happy ending. In fact, it was largely the opposite. As halor put it, they're all "cockblocked." But, they all acted in character, and the world had internal consistency. I just saw bitching about the details J.K. Rowling has given about how Harry Potter worked out after the ending because it was all too happy. Now I see bitching about how The Inheritance Cycle ended because they got realistic bittersweet endings. #141 - centaurstesticle (10/12/2015) [-] it was the worst ending... i feel u #86 - rochal (10/12/2015) [-] rly bro #87 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Yes. There's 100x better stuff out there. #157 - unikornking (10/12/2015) [-] Like what? And what makes the books shit? #171 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] To be completely honest, it's been so long since I've read them and looked into anything about them, I would not be able to argue what is good or bad about them well without reading and looking into it more again, and I don't care to do that since I don't even like the books. The series did get a whole lot of criticism though, so if you're interested in seeing arguments for the series being bad, I'm certain you'll be able to find plenty by googling them. Many will most likely match what mine used to be before I forgot them all. #173 - unikornking (10/12/2015) [-] If you really can't remember any legitimate criticisms, I imagine it's more like a meh to you, if you really thought it was a piece of shit you wouldn't forget why you think that way. But if those books really are "shit", what do you consider good? #174 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] I don't think they're unreadable garbage. I did read them all, I just don't think they're very good. But no, there have been things I loved and forgotten what I thought were so good about them, same goes for things I didn't think were good. I'll name some I thought were much better: The Worldbreaker Saga so far is very good, I think. Joe Abercrombie's First Law stuff (though book 1 was quite worse than the rest) ASOIAF (though I found A Feast For Crows incredibly boring, and I can't remember how good I thought the books after that were. Which is odd, I know. I remember the books before AFFC being good, though.) Leviathan Wakes (though this is scifi) #175 - unikornking (10/12/2015) [-] Kind of surprising to see you list SOIAF, I see a lot of people saying they're bad because of length/ amount of detail ( Though I personally love them). #176 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] I dislike the amount of detail. Not sure if I can say how much description he puts in is actually bad, but I do dislike how much there is. What I do think is kinda bad is how much description he puts into random people's food and other such unimportant things, especially when they're minor characters (I might be remembering wrong but I think this happens fairly often?) I do love the series though and do think it's very good and done well. #88 - rochal (10/12/2015) [-] a matter of opinion, no need to shit on a book many people enjoyed. just makes you a douche #89 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Nah, man. You can enjoy something while realising it's not very good. There's some things I enjoy which I realise are pretty bad. Also, if I'm a douche for shitting on the book then everyone here is a douche for shitting on the movie. Same thing. #137 - shanethedragon (10/12/2015) [-] your just saying this so you can enjoy your opinion #169 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Nope. I watched SAO up until the end of the first arc. I enjoyed it as light entertainment, but I still think it's shit. #100 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] If you guys think the book is actually good, whatever. But you don't think there's a difference between shitting on a book and shitting on a movie do you? Many people enjoyed Eragon books, many enjoyed the movie. How is it a bad thing to write negatively about the book but not the movie? #134 - chiselbit (10/12/2015) [-] Who enjoyed the movie? It got panned across the board or so I thought. #170 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Most disliked it, but I'm sure there will be many out there who do like it. There are many who like the book, and many who don't. When I was young I greatly enjoyed both the book and the movie. Now I see them both as trash. Writing negatively about a book and writing negatively about a movie is the same thing. #90 - rochal (10/12/2015) [-] go back to the annex toby #91 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Well now I'm just confused #70 - ilovetocuddle (10/12/2015) [-] this comment gave me cancer #62 - thevaulthunter (10/12/2015) [-] #67 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] I'm going to get many red thumbs here aren't I hahah #172 - mintea (10/12/2015) [-] Funny, I actually gained 10 green thumbs overall from all of this so far, due to this comment. I don't care about thumbs much either way, I'll gladly get thumbed down to hell if people disagree with me, but I found it funny that in a thread with the majority being against me, I still made a gain in thumbs. #49 - dorfdorfdorf (10/11/2015) [-] what do you mean? the books were awesome, but you say that as if they made a movie adaptation #44 - woolfy (10/11/2015) [-] Keep your spirits up. It was made in 2006. With Hollywood stuck in a ten year loop, we're already due for a gritty reboot. #42 - ttallonn (10/11/2015) [-] I loved the Eragon books, and I cant remember anything that was the same between them #41 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] The dude that played the old dude was alright. #135 - billbothedestroyer (10/12/2015) [-] Jeremy irons was a prefect choice for Brom #39 - stickmanz (10/11/2015) [-] why would you even mention that movie #33 - shadowbreech (10/11/2015) [-] Don't say it'll be a disappointment man, negativity like this is why they haven't made a movie adaptation... <- Before anyone fucking says it... #35 - disappointment (10/11/2015) [-] #36 - shadowbreech (10/11/2015) [-] No offense #29 - homosexualpirate (10/11/2015) [-] Man they fucked it up so badly like was this even based off of the book? #25 - novren (10/11/2015) [-] Yes, my mother being killed in front of me would be slightly off-putting. #26 - charak (10/11/2015) [-] you should be off pudding #28 - novren (10/11/2015) [-] oh man I just realized I'm blue #55 - fickarese (10/12/2015) [-] da ba de da ba dye #27 - novren (10/11/2015) [-] i've just been off. didn't have any pudding tho. #23 - agentdennis (10/11/2015) [-] Disappointment would be a huge understatement.
#8 - First playthrough vs New Game +.	10/11/2015 on This is One Punch Man	+79
#4 - It was hard water. [+] (31 new replies)	10/10/2015 on Water Balloon Drop	+277
#62 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] The number of people who didn't get your joke is astoundingly, shamefully high. #69 - opticmonkey (10/11/2015) [-] Seriously who hasn't heard of hard water? #39 - youreminenow (10/11/2015) [-] It splattered at the end. #42 - ainise (10/11/2015) [-] Hard water isn't ice. Read above. >.> #34 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] hard water is ice #41 - ainise (10/11/2015) [-] "Hard" is not what you'd assume it is if you knew nothing of mineral waters. In this instance it's not refering to the density of an object but rather how difficult it is on the pipes it's running through. Hard Water deteriorates things faster than soft water and has mixed benefits & difficulties upon digestion. Hard water refers to water that is rich in Limestone and Chalk. You can tell if you have hard water by looking at the residue left behind on thigns that are in constant contact with water and are not made of metal(usually..in rare cases it can show up on metal too, but it's easiest to see on porceilin). The residue is fairly hard to get off and is between the Red and Yellow spectrum, as the image shows - generally sitting around a dingey orange color. The color shows how rich it is in either Chalk or Limestone, more specifically Magnesium vs Calcium vs Limestone. #26 - bionicpanda (10/11/2015) [-] >hard water i wonder what that's called #57 - JonathanNowFuckYou (10/11/2015) [-] turns out you've horribly fucked up #40 - ainise (10/11/2015) [-] It's called hard water... It's a joke, mate. Hard water is a type of water that is rich in limestone and Chalk, which is made up of mostly Calcium and Magnesium. It has numerous benefits and risks most of which aren't understood and the easiest way to know if you have hard water is to look in your shower after it's not been cleaned in a while. If there's anything between the Yellow to Red spectrum(generally orange), you likely have Hard Water. #50 - fukatron (10/11/2015) [-] This looks more like physics, not chemistry.. #54 - ainise (10/11/2015) [-] *ainise used "roll picture"* ainise rolled imageI was explaining the joke. "Hard", in normal context means dense or hard to seperate. Like how a Diamond is considered harder than steel. However, in the joke it's a play on words since "hard" in water, specifically in irrigation, refering to the contents of the water. It's a subversion of what the word usually means in hopes to make people giggle a little and click a super happy pumpkin. It's not physics or chemistry..it's a joke. #55 - fukatron (10/11/2015) [-] ...I thought you were trying to explain the video, cuz if someone doesn't get the joke, as simple as it is, they aren't deserving of a 2 paragraph, scientifically detailed explination. Just red thumbs. I was just saying, the video is most likely physics, not chemistry is all. #67 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] How hard is it for you to understand that all sciences work to together in almost all ways pal? #68 - fukatron (10/11/2015) [-] >Implying most simple problems have to be interconnected for them to be applicable This shit is simple gravity, density and collision. #61 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] Chemistry is just a subset of physics. I'm sure you're talking about Newtonian physics. #58 - ainise (10/11/2015) [-] It's totally physics. But hey, I'm a teacher at heart. It's ignorance not stupidity. Some people simply don't know that there are terms like soft and hard water, and why would they if they haven't taken a chemistry class or a good history class? If it only takes 20 seconds to solves someones ignorance, it seems like time well spent. #59 - fukatron (10/11/2015) [-] If that helps you sleep at night. Enjoy the 12 year olds asking the same question every 10 seconds #60 - ainise (10/11/2015) [-] *ainise used "roll picture"* ainise rolled imageIf you explain it well enough, they only ask once. #14 - potatot (10/11/2015) [-] was the water wet, too? #15 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] There's soft and hard water #16 - potatot (10/11/2015) [-] yeah is the hard water wet? i need to know #22 - lmOldGreg (10/11/2015) [-] Water with a higher level of calcium. Causes things to get limescale quicker. #35 - quackyquack (10/11/2015) [-] not just calcium but any/all multi-valent cations thanks bye #18 - warioteam (10/11/2015) [-] it is after a little while #38 - newtamalego (10/11/2015) [-] but that's the soft water on the hard water hard water isn't wet #63 - anon (10/11/2015) [-] What? Yes it is. Hard water is water with a high concentration of minerals. Soft water is water with a relatively low concentration of minerals. Ocean water is hard water, and I've certainly never emerged from the ocean dry. My house runs off a well, which is full of hard water. Yet I'm still able to get wet when I get in my shower. What makes you think hard water isn't wet? Are you thinking of the mineral buildup resulting from hard water? That's not hard water, dude. Those are just minerals. #66 - newtamalego (10/11/2015) [-] [spoiler] maybe that's one definition but we're talking about ice [/spoiler] #48 - jaharath (10/11/2015) [-] my hard water is as wet as the normal water...cuz it's hard..and wet(not naturally obviously...) #43 - warioteam (10/11/2015) [-] >>#18 #51 - newtamalego (10/11/2015) [-] but thats the soft water the hard water turns into soft water which coats the hard water #77 - ainise (10/12/2015) [-] "Hard water" is specifically a term referring to water that is high in Limestone and Calcium. High in this instance is a relative term, but I digress. My house, for example, has hard water. It leaves an orange coating on our ceramic and has mix of health benefits and risks that should be avoided in young children. I explained it better somewhere else in this thread if you're interested.
#6 - And then the tiger sneezed.	10/10/2015 on Perspective	+2
#4 - Shaolin Stripper	10/10/2015 on when a catfight boils up	0
#28 - I just helped bury my friend's dog who looked a lot like the d…	10/10/2015 on Connection	0
#50 - Chrom and whoever he marries ***** during the two year …	10/07/2015 on Awakening was a good game	0