|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #4708 on SubscribersLevel 151 Comments: Faptastic
OfflineSend mail to danirblade Block danirblade Invite danirblade to be your friend
- Views: 54836sex positions 2
2412 152 Total: +2260
- Views: 28641sex positions
1100 143 Total: +957
- Views: 23321sex positions 3
89 11 Total: +78
- Views: 2129when subtitles are awesome
48 7 Total: +41
- Views: 1925sex ed
23 4 Total: +19
- Views: 4944all ponies in curcles have...
32 15 Total: +17
- Views: 5145Snivellus Snape
17 3 Total: +14
latest user's comments
|#16 - **danirblade rolled a random image posted in comment #45 at… [+] (1 new reply)||02/15/2014 on what is it||0|
|#15 - Comment deleted||02/15/2014 on what is it||0|
|#13 - Picture [+] (11 new replies)||02/14/2014 on Hue||-73|
|#1217 - aya! nice ****** day! [+] (1 new reply)||02/14/2014 on ITT: Roll your valentine||+2|
|#1216 - you are not alone||02/14/2014 on ITT: Roll your valentine||+1|
|#1213 - **danirblade rolled user thesovereigngrave ** prepare your anus||02/14/2014 on ITT: Roll your valentine||+1|
|#48 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||02/07/2014 on I wonder what Bill wrote?||0|
|#46 - my word [+] (3 new replies)||02/07/2014 on I wonder what Bill wrote?||0|
|#45 - it might be true that im biased, and maybe its because i dont …||02/07/2014 on I wonder what Bill wrote?||+2|
|#14 - the interesting thing to me was that through the debate i kept… [+] (9 new replies)||02/07/2014 on I wonder what Bill wrote?||+11|
#40 - 2scared2login (02/07/2014) [-]
Okay here's the thing bud, I am not a creationist. I find the idea laughable, but listening to this debate, 100% Ken Ham was the winner. Bill ignored the majority of the points that Ken made, and what irks me most that is that Bill spent most of the debate arguing through observational facts rather than the historical science that Ken was trying to (correctly) explain was the basis of the debate. The sheer arrogance in doing that, and in disregarding the fact that there is an element of belief even in any historical postulation, is just disgusting, and even more disappointingly it seems to be shared by most people who believe in the same historical model included.
Anyways TL;DR Ken Ham's view is misguided but Bill lost the debate and you are a biased fool for not recognizing this
#50 - rhydm (02/07/2014) [-]
How, please explain how Bill lost. Hams arguments were "the bible", "there's a book about it", I don't believe in science that can prove me wrong, god gave us logic... All of that is bullshit god didn't make logic, it evolved through experience of countless generations of people. All he said to the trees that were older then 6k years, the ice layers, the fossils, the sediments... we weren't there to see them forming. Neither was he present when the bible was written.
Ham couldn't prove anything, couldn't make a single prediction and all he was able to say that their "phisical models" can explein some point/claims he makes and that they are still improving them and "you weren't there to see".
Ham mainly said that the methods scientists use aren't reliable even tho those methods can be proven to work again and a gain and claimed that the word of god is the truth. While Nye presented proof and logic that exposed giant flaws in Hams model.
Anon you are clearly the one who is biased.
#45 - danirblade (02/07/2014) [-]
Join Subscribe ponytime