|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #1614 on CommentsLevel 325 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
OfflineSend mail to dafiltafish Block dafiltafish Invite dafiltafish to be your friend flag avatar
you found my page. have fun with that.
latest user's comments
|#50 - Money and politics once again hinder progress.||11/01/2013 on The Simpsons go to Chernobyl||0|
|#33 - What if you had a small aircraft carrier that could run itself…||11/01/2013 on Take it slow, its my first...||0|
|#24 - You are preaching to the man that ordered 20 nuggets less than… [+] (3 new replies)||11/01/2013 on McDonald Facts||+13|
#128 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/01/2013) [-]
fuck, when i'm high or drunk I curse that documentary for no more supersize.
|#30 - It should also be an ocean going vessel and have the ability t… [+] (2 new replies)||11/01/2013 on Take it slow, its my first...||0|
|#28 - We need an accredited engineer, a sculptor, and someone with money. [+] (4 new replies)||11/01/2013 on Take it slow, its my first...||0|
|#26 - I like it, but what army would commission it? The U.S. i… [+] (6 new replies)||11/01/2013 on Take it slow, its my first...||+1|
|#24 - Train. [+] (20 new replies)||11/01/2013 on Take it slow, its my first...||+1|
#54 - xxgeneralxx (11/01/2013) [-]
nazis planned to build something of that nature. the p1500 ratte. powered by 4 u-boat engines. also look up the overland train, the USA did built that one.
both arent feasible due to being too easily target able, and non cost effectiveness, respectively.
what about a nuclear engine you say? well look up "the flying crowbar" and you will see another usa design that was never built, but utilized immense amounts of nuclear power in a worst case scenario.
#53 - meganinja (11/01/2013) [-]
I've put a lot of thought into it. What's the use of it? Sure, it could blow up other tanks, but you don't need tanks to take out tanks. It would be horribly innefficient, slow, although it would be hella hard to kill, imagine the manufacturing costs. All a person would need to do would be place C4 or mines and blow off the treads, mount the fucker and kill the people inside. It would be risky as hell and nobody on the other side would want to see it, but it could be dealt with.
Or, easier way, throw a molotov coctail at it. Burns the people inside alive.
#51 - slayerbrkk (11/01/2013) [-]
Dora 80cm railway gun
www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/attachment.php?s=8646c95fe4b98fdecd53411dc018b09d&attachmentid=162413&stc=1&d=1324581542 since I cant post pics
|#49 - ... what useful information.||11/01/2013 on How to tell them apart||0|
|#108 - If you are in Mexico it is "God damn it Enrique, we have …||11/01/2013 on Wait, No One Else Does||+1|
|#49 - HA! USA #1, go broncos!||11/01/2013 on Drinking age||0|
|#90 - MOAR. these are some sexy looking people, my god||11/01/2013 on Faces of the world||0|
|#8 - Picture||11/01/2013 on For bobby||0|
|#105 - it is now.||11/01/2013 on Who are you? And what do...||0|
|#43 - Oh, but it is real. It is just not as old as OP implies. [+] (1 new reply)||11/01/2013 on The Simpsons go to Chernobyl||0|
|#41 - Scroll down, and you shall find the answer. [+] (3 new replies)||11/01/2013 on The Simpsons go to Chernobyl||0|
|#40 - The advantage is solid and liquid waste. better for air qualit… [+] (2 new replies)||11/01/2013 on The Simpsons go to Chernobyl||+1|
#49 - coolcalx (11/01/2013) [-]
it's possible to refine coal into a liquid form which causes relatively small pollution, however this is not done because power companies don't want to waste the resources to convert the coal into a clean substance when they could just dump the pollutants in the air.
the US has a very large coal supply, so eventually, they will probably end up using that cleaner process
|#29 - The only thing I did not like about halo 4 was forge. the stor…||11/01/2013 on Winner kid||+2|
|#46 - Shhhhh, you are making the servers nervous with your questions… [+] (1 new reply)||11/01/2013 on (may need to enlarge)||+1|
|#44 - Because it is the nature of the internet. Do not punish it if … [+] (3 new replies)||11/01/2013 on (may need to enlarge)||+3|
|#84 - Faster than laying bricks with the same affect. I would call t… [+] (1 new reply)||11/01/2013 on easy mode||+1|
|#69 - What country and when? Spain I can sort of understand…||11/01/2013 on Australia labeled by a Brit||+3|
|#66 - care to edumacate me? [+] (2 new replies)||11/01/2013 on Australia labeled by a Brit||0|
#69 - dafiltafish (11/01/2013) [-]
What country and when?
Spain I can sort of understand. England I know did want a colony for resources. The dutch I know little about and the vikings were out to conquer the world by frozen sea and river.
kind of a dick way of saying I'm not so sure about your story here, sorry.
|#74 - meanwhile, 2 years later...||11/01/2013 on Clients From Hell||0|
|#4300288 - Comment deleted [+] (3 new replies)||10/31/2013 on Friendly||+2|
|#4300279 - Comment deleted||10/31/2013 on Friendly||0|