Upload
Login or register

daburger

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:2/22/2012
Last Login:12/16/2012
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 12485 total,  14092 ,  1607
Comment Thumbs: 1459 total,  2197 ,  738
Content Level Progress: 46.5% (465/1000)
Level 212 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 59% (59/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:294315
Times Content Favorited:494 times
Total Comments Made:355
FJ Points:13940

latest user's comments

#29 - Wow you really put in a lot of effort into something that just… 08/23/2012 on Any questions? +4
#11 - Comment deleted 08/23/2012 on Lesser known webcomics (1) 0
#53 - True dat 08/19/2012 on Vladmir u so silly 0
#41 - Form of government =/= type of economy. We're a democracy with…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/19/2012 on Vladmir u so silly 0
#52 - CoolStoryBrosky (08/19/2012) [-]
We're actually a Republic.
User avatar
#53 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
True dat
#42 - deadfeds has deleted their comment.
#36 - Technically we're not capitalist; however, Russia was the exac…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/19/2012 on Vladmir u so silly 0
#38 - deadfeds has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#41 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
Form of government =/= type of economy. We're a democracy with a modified capitalist economy (a market-based economy with a social safety net.)
#52 - CoolStoryBrosky (08/19/2012) [-]
We're actually a Republic.
User avatar
#53 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
True dat
#42 - deadfeds has deleted their comment.
#105 - Natural selection is not purely about genetics and I'm fully a…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/19/2012 on Immigrants -2
#127 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>assuming I watch MSNBC
>implying I'm a narcissist
>resorting to passive-agressive personal insults because you can't win an argument on the internet

I think I'm done here.
#81 - How is that misunderstanding natural selection? The strong wil…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/19/2012 on Immigrants -3
#93 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
You mean to tell me now I have to explain natural selection too? Did you ever graduate the 6th grade?

Natural selection is PURELY about genetics. It has been perverted over the years by disinforming fucks like you to justify genocide. And that's exactly what you're doing right now; justifying the genocide of the Native Americans via the "natural selection" argument. Maybe your racism isn't intentional; but it's still irrational.

What natural selection really is: the survival of one organism because its genetic makeup makes it more likely to survive in a changing environment. For example, a frog with a less porous skin surviving during a dry season; or a moth that's slightly browner being able to camouflage better, allowing it to not be eaten. These traits would be passed down to offspring which could survive in that threatening environment better than their counterparts.

This concept is not interchangeable with the development of technology. The Europeans didn't "adapt" technology. They "adapted" an immunity to smallpox, but they didn't take over the American continents with fucking smallpox; they did it with weapons. Weapons developed over a period of hundreds of years. And this was only possible due to their unique culture and location. It would have been impossible for the Native Americans to replicate anything like that.

Maybe you think history works the same way that a game of Sid Meier's Civilization unfolds. It doesn't.

Go read Guns, Germs, and Steel.
User avatar
#105 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
Natural selection is not purely about genetics and I'm fully aware of how it is preformed, I know this because I'm fucking majoring in it.

No shit it's not interchangeable with technology and as I already stated, the majority of Natives killed were killed by fucking goddamn shitty ass fucking ass disease. For someone who calls people dense you're pretty dense because you can't seem to get that fact in your damn head. While technology did give whites an advantage, their immunity to their disease ultimately gave them the edge.

Also I'm apparently a racist now? Shut the hell up and watch your fucking msnbc,cockwad.

But for all intensive purposes, you're right on any argument that you wish to continue because I have better things to do than fight via the internet with some narcissist.

I said good day, sir.
#127 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>assuming I watch MSNBC
>implying I'm a narcissist
>resorting to passive-agressive personal insults because you can't win an argument on the internet

I think I'm done here.
#73 - It actually was a joke, and some people saw it as that, but ap…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/19/2012 on Immigrants -3
#77 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>misuses greentext
>misunderstands the concept of natural selection

Whatever. The point about the Europeans developing technology and disease resistance due to their location was purely circumstance. If that's what you purport to believe, then I agree with you. If you're implying it was due to genetics, intelligence, foresight, or anything else other than pure circumstance, then you're wrong. And a dumbfuck. And that's all there is to it.

/thread
User avatar
#81 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
How is that misunderstanding natural selection? The strong will survive? Since the Europeans were able to adapt to their environment they became the stronger of the two. Of course it's not due to genetics or intellectual levels, and no one can stand there and say "well when the Europeans came why didn't they just invent medicine and guns" because that's idiotic.

You're still an ass, good day to you.
#93 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
You mean to tell me now I have to explain natural selection too? Did you ever graduate the 6th grade?

Natural selection is PURELY about genetics. It has been perverted over the years by disinforming fucks like you to justify genocide. And that's exactly what you're doing right now; justifying the genocide of the Native Americans via the "natural selection" argument. Maybe your racism isn't intentional; but it's still irrational.

What natural selection really is: the survival of one organism because its genetic makeup makes it more likely to survive in a changing environment. For example, a frog with a less porous skin surviving during a dry season; or a moth that's slightly browner being able to camouflage better, allowing it to not be eaten. These traits would be passed down to offspring which could survive in that threatening environment better than their counterparts.

This concept is not interchangeable with the development of technology. The Europeans didn't "adapt" technology. They "adapted" an immunity to smallpox, but they didn't take over the American continents with fucking smallpox; they did it with weapons. Weapons developed over a period of hundreds of years. And this was only possible due to their unique culture and location. It would have been impossible for the Native Americans to replicate anything like that.

Maybe you think history works the same way that a game of Sid Meier's Civilization unfolds. It doesn't.

Go read Guns, Germs, and Steel.
User avatar
#105 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
Natural selection is not purely about genetics and I'm fully aware of how it is preformed, I know this because I'm fucking majoring in it.

No shit it's not interchangeable with technology and as I already stated, the majority of Natives killed were killed by fucking goddamn shitty ass fucking ass disease. For someone who calls people dense you're pretty dense because you can't seem to get that fact in your damn head. While technology did give whites an advantage, their immunity to their disease ultimately gave them the edge.

Also I'm apparently a racist now? Shut the hell up and watch your fucking msnbc,cockwad.

But for all intensive purposes, you're right on any argument that you wish to continue because I have better things to do than fight via the internet with some narcissist.

I said good day, sir.
#127 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>assuming I watch MSNBC
>implying I'm a narcissist
>resorting to passive-agressive personal insults because you can't win an argument on the internet

I think I'm done here.
#64 - I have read all of my comments. Maybe you should too. Fir…  [+] (7 new replies) 08/19/2012 on Immigrants -5
#66 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>implying that stupid piece of unfunny shit was a joke
As if I'd actually believe you weren't being serious. You're saying that now because you realize how misinformed you are.

>implying the natives were nearly as militaristic as the Europeans
Europe's natural resources were always being fought over, mainly because of the nature of feudalism. As such, the Europeans were constantly devising new and more efficient ways of killing one another. That's what drove technology forward.

In the Americas, the natives lived mostly peacefully. They barely used what plentiful natural resources were available, so they didn't fight on the scale Europeans did. They never developed the gun because it wasn't necessary for hunting game. They didn't "discover the gun through trade" because there was nobody to trade with who had guns.

The Native Americans didn't start to fight amongst different tribes until the Europeans arrived. The fights were over beaver hunting-grounds. The Europeans wanted fur and promised not to encroach on the natives if they continued to trade with them (a lie, but whatever). As such, the natives needed the fur to survive and were prepared to fight over it. They also obtained guns from the Europeans in order to more efficiently kill other natives.

But I'm some kind of "superior cock-wad" because I know history and you clearly don't, right?
User avatar
#73 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
It actually was a joke, and some people saw it as that, but apparently you're too sophisticated for making jokes on the internet.

>Look how cultural you are!

You're not completely correct.

>Holy bat shit, you don't know everything?

While Native Americans were peaceful in North America, they did wage war in middle and, some of, Southern America (even before the bad white people came) Also the main reason why the Native Americans were overtaken was because of the disease Europeans incidentally brought over. Something like 100 Spanish Conquistadors were able to take over the whole Inca empire because of this.

And no, I'm still going to stand by my thinking, because of the internal difference in Europe and its central location, the Europeans were able to develop better technology and grow immune to some of the worst diseases, thus conquer the fucking world. This is pretty much the process of "natural selection", and call me a Darwinist but I believe it.

>Fuck you
#77 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>misuses greentext
>misunderstands the concept of natural selection

Whatever. The point about the Europeans developing technology and disease resistance due to their location was purely circumstance. If that's what you purport to believe, then I agree with you. If you're implying it was due to genetics, intelligence, foresight, or anything else other than pure circumstance, then you're wrong. And a dumbfuck. And that's all there is to it.

/thread
User avatar
#81 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
How is that misunderstanding natural selection? The strong will survive? Since the Europeans were able to adapt to their environment they became the stronger of the two. Of course it's not due to genetics or intellectual levels, and no one can stand there and say "well when the Europeans came why didn't they just invent medicine and guns" because that's idiotic.

You're still an ass, good day to you.
#93 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
You mean to tell me now I have to explain natural selection too? Did you ever graduate the 6th grade?

Natural selection is PURELY about genetics. It has been perverted over the years by disinforming fucks like you to justify genocide. And that's exactly what you're doing right now; justifying the genocide of the Native Americans via the "natural selection" argument. Maybe your racism isn't intentional; but it's still irrational.

What natural selection really is: the survival of one organism because its genetic makeup makes it more likely to survive in a changing environment. For example, a frog with a less porous skin surviving during a dry season; or a moth that's slightly browner being able to camouflage better, allowing it to not be eaten. These traits would be passed down to offspring which could survive in that threatening environment better than their counterparts.

This concept is not interchangeable with the development of technology. The Europeans didn't "adapt" technology. They "adapted" an immunity to smallpox, but they didn't take over the American continents with fucking smallpox; they did it with weapons. Weapons developed over a period of hundreds of years. And this was only possible due to their unique culture and location. It would have been impossible for the Native Americans to replicate anything like that.

Maybe you think history works the same way that a game of Sid Meier's Civilization unfolds. It doesn't.

Go read Guns, Germs, and Steel.
User avatar
#105 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
Natural selection is not purely about genetics and I'm fully aware of how it is preformed, I know this because I'm fucking majoring in it.

No shit it's not interchangeable with technology and as I already stated, the majority of Natives killed were killed by fucking goddamn shitty ass fucking ass disease. For someone who calls people dense you're pretty dense because you can't seem to get that fact in your damn head. While technology did give whites an advantage, their immunity to their disease ultimately gave them the edge.

Also I'm apparently a racist now? Shut the hell up and watch your fucking msnbc,cockwad.

But for all intensive purposes, you're right on any argument that you wish to continue because I have better things to do than fight via the internet with some narcissist.

I said good day, sir.
#127 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>assuming I watch MSNBC
>implying I'm a narcissist
>resorting to passive-agressive personal insults because you can't win an argument on the internet

I think I'm done here.
#53 - So wait, I'm illogical for thinking that its the Native Americ…  [+] (9 new replies) 08/19/2012 on Immigrants -6
#57 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>isolated on a continent 5000 miles away from Europe
>implying they could have traded with Europe

You just went full retard.

>implying it is anyone's fault

That's what I've been saying. It's NOBODY'S fault. Are you that thick?

I don't even fucking have an opinion on the morals of imperialism. This was never about sympathy, empathy, or the lack of either feelings. This is about your blatant idiocy. Go read all of your stupid fucking comments again.
User avatar
#64 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
I have read all of my comments. Maybe you should too.
First of all it started as a joke. Fuck me, right? But honestly, you would think that the population of two whole continents would be able to scramble together at least some sort of technology. It's not like they were all living in peace, they had internal struggle, thus competition among themselves.
Second, stop acting like a superior cock-wad because let's face it, if you're on this site chances are you're not the winner of a noble fucking prize.
#66 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>implying that stupid piece of unfunny shit was a joke
As if I'd actually believe you weren't being serious. You're saying that now because you realize how misinformed you are.

>implying the natives were nearly as militaristic as the Europeans
Europe's natural resources were always being fought over, mainly because of the nature of feudalism. As such, the Europeans were constantly devising new and more efficient ways of killing one another. That's what drove technology forward.

In the Americas, the natives lived mostly peacefully. They barely used what plentiful natural resources were available, so they didn't fight on the scale Europeans did. They never developed the gun because it wasn't necessary for hunting game. They didn't "discover the gun through trade" because there was nobody to trade with who had guns.

The Native Americans didn't start to fight amongst different tribes until the Europeans arrived. The fights were over beaver hunting-grounds. The Europeans wanted fur and promised not to encroach on the natives if they continued to trade with them (a lie, but whatever). As such, the natives needed the fur to survive and were prepared to fight over it. They also obtained guns from the Europeans in order to more efficiently kill other natives.

But I'm some kind of "superior cock-wad" because I know history and you clearly don't, right?
User avatar
#73 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
It actually was a joke, and some people saw it as that, but apparently you're too sophisticated for making jokes on the internet.

>Look how cultural you are!

You're not completely correct.

>Holy bat shit, you don't know everything?

While Native Americans were peaceful in North America, they did wage war in middle and, some of, Southern America (even before the bad white people came) Also the main reason why the Native Americans were overtaken was because of the disease Europeans incidentally brought over. Something like 100 Spanish Conquistadors were able to take over the whole Inca empire because of this.

And no, I'm still going to stand by my thinking, because of the internal difference in Europe and its central location, the Europeans were able to develop better technology and grow immune to some of the worst diseases, thus conquer the fucking world. This is pretty much the process of "natural selection", and call me a Darwinist but I believe it.

>Fuck you
#77 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>misuses greentext
>misunderstands the concept of natural selection

Whatever. The point about the Europeans developing technology and disease resistance due to their location was purely circumstance. If that's what you purport to believe, then I agree with you. If you're implying it was due to genetics, intelligence, foresight, or anything else other than pure circumstance, then you're wrong. And a dumbfuck. And that's all there is to it.

/thread
User avatar
#81 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
How is that misunderstanding natural selection? The strong will survive? Since the Europeans were able to adapt to their environment they became the stronger of the two. Of course it's not due to genetics or intellectual levels, and no one can stand there and say "well when the Europeans came why didn't they just invent medicine and guns" because that's idiotic.

You're still an ass, good day to you.
#93 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
You mean to tell me now I have to explain natural selection too? Did you ever graduate the 6th grade?

Natural selection is PURELY about genetics. It has been perverted over the years by disinforming fucks like you to justify genocide. And that's exactly what you're doing right now; justifying the genocide of the Native Americans via the "natural selection" argument. Maybe your racism isn't intentional; but it's still irrational.

What natural selection really is: the survival of one organism because its genetic makeup makes it more likely to survive in a changing environment. For example, a frog with a less porous skin surviving during a dry season; or a moth that's slightly browner being able to camouflage better, allowing it to not be eaten. These traits would be passed down to offspring which could survive in that threatening environment better than their counterparts.

This concept is not interchangeable with the development of technology. The Europeans didn't "adapt" technology. They "adapted" an immunity to smallpox, but they didn't take over the American continents with fucking smallpox; they did it with weapons. Weapons developed over a period of hundreds of years. And this was only possible due to their unique culture and location. It would have been impossible for the Native Americans to replicate anything like that.

Maybe you think history works the same way that a game of Sid Meier's Civilization unfolds. It doesn't.

Go read Guns, Germs, and Steel.
User avatar
#105 - daburger (08/19/2012) [-]
Natural selection is not purely about genetics and I'm fully aware of how it is preformed, I know this because I'm fucking majoring in it.

No shit it's not interchangeable with technology and as I already stated, the majority of Natives killed were killed by fucking goddamn shitty ass fucking ass disease. For someone who calls people dense you're pretty dense because you can't seem to get that fact in your damn head. While technology did give whites an advantage, their immunity to their disease ultimately gave them the edge.

Also I'm apparently a racist now? Shut the hell up and watch your fucking msnbc,cockwad.

But for all intensive purposes, you're right on any argument that you wish to continue because I have better things to do than fight via the internet with some narcissist.

I said good day, sir.
#127 - aBlindMoron (08/19/2012) [-]
>assuming I watch MSNBC
>implying I'm a narcissist
>resorting to passive-agressive personal insults because you can't win an argument on the internet

I think I'm done here.