| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
cryingchicken
| Rank #9661 on Content Online Send mail to cryingchicken Block cryingchicken Invite cryingchicken to be your friend flag avatar |
|
I'm the nigga, the nigga nigga, like how you figure? getting figures and fucking bitches.
- Views: 5330
98
14
Total: +84
Comments: 4
Favorites: 2
Uploaded: 03/28/13
aPPEL - Views: 1033
13
12
Total: +1
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 12/16/12
OI M8! I JUS SAW DEE 'OBBIT! - Views: 603
8
27
Total: -19
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 11/16/12
Spik wasn't prepared for this - Views: 427
6
47
Total: -41
Comments: 64
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 11/16/12
Stupid niggers XD - Views: 5582
92
19
Total: +73
Comments: 4
Favorites: 18
Uploaded: 10/13/12
Just some wisdom - Views: 844
10
15
Total: -5
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 10/04/12
dumbitch, yes, this itch is very...
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
user favorites
latest user's comments
| #89 - It's not even an unpopular opinion, why do you think he's so s… | 17 hours ago on True... | 0 |
| #64 - Firstly, Tool would be considered a new band and bonobo is pre… [+] (1 new reply) | 20 hours ago on True... | 0 |
| this debate can really go on forever. i truly believe it's all about the message you send with your music,which is supposed to be a way of expressing art and one's feelings along with it, and i'm sure the bands i mentioned managed to do so quite well. i actually believe every album alice in chains has released with layne staley has a touch of its own, and more importantly, every song individually has that sheer raw power and energy i'm looking for when i listen to rock. fairly enough "facelift" was indeed the first album and didn't really have an identity of its own. "dirt" is just brutal in my opinion, and "tripod" is that dark, grim-themed album which closes the curtain on the band's activity. as for aerosmith, they have a special place in my hearth not because of those crappy new ballads, but because of their first albums which were mainly what rock'n'roll was supposed to be at that time. | ||
| #53 - He spends a fair amount of time finding samples for his beats,… [+] (3 new replies) | 20 hours ago on True... | 0 |
| well, after i quit listening to hip-hop i turned my attention towards older music, whatever that may be. so i slowly went towards rock music and i was absolutely blown out of my mind. there is just no way to compare the effort old artists put in to combine what is enjoyable to listen to with what is complex in music. so i sticked with bands and artists such as django reinhardt, jimi hendrix, miles davis, alice in chains, aerosmith, bonobo, tool, al green, the police etc. i tried listening to newer bands but i was kind of disappointed because they mainly sound the same, although some such as wolfmother,the arctic monkeys and muse really stand out. i said that i was in a band to stress the fact that there is no way lil wayne's effort could even come close to what a band has to do in order to write good songs, and there many things which have to do with synchronization between members and the complexity of the songs themselves, not to mention the individual effort every member of the band has to make in order for all of them to reach a satisfying level Firstly, Tool would be considered a new band and bonobo is pretty new as well. Also if you think making beats is easy then you are grossly misinformed, and I believe you are probably exaggerating the effort it takes to create music in your band. I understand that it's not easy but generally when the melody of a song is lead by a single guitar the rest comes pretty easily. Furthermore while the bands you mentioned were "good music" it's difficult to see how you can so easily put them on a pedestal above other types of music. While alice in chains produce many emotionally fueled and powerful songs they failed to construct well flowing albums which ended up sounding like a collection of disjointed singles. And aerosmith can't be seen as anything more than a cock-rock band whose success was fueled by their half-assed rock ballads. this debate can really go on forever. i truly believe it's all about the message you send with your music,which is supposed to be a way of expressing art and one's feelings along with it, and i'm sure the bands i mentioned managed to do so quite well. i actually believe every album alice in chains has released with layne staley has a touch of its own, and more importantly, every song individually has that sheer raw power and energy i'm looking for when i listen to rock. fairly enough "facelift" was indeed the first album and didn't really have an identity of its own. "dirt" is just brutal in my opinion, and "tripod" is that dark, grim-themed album which closes the curtain on the band's activity. as for aerosmith, they have a special place in my hearth not because of those crappy new ballads, but because of their first albums which were mainly what rock'n'roll was supposed to be at that time. | ||
| #50 - The same can be said about a lot of "good music." Al… [+] (5 new replies) | 20 hours ago on True... | 0 |
| He spends a fair amount of time finding samples for his beats, practising his flow and writing somewhat "decent" lyrics. Also, if I may ask, what do you consider good music? well, after i quit listening to hip-hop i turned my attention towards older music, whatever that may be. so i slowly went towards rock music and i was absolutely blown out of my mind. there is just no way to compare the effort old artists put in to combine what is enjoyable to listen to with what is complex in music. so i sticked with bands and artists such as django reinhardt, jimi hendrix, miles davis, alice in chains, aerosmith, bonobo, tool, al green, the police etc. i tried listening to newer bands but i was kind of disappointed because they mainly sound the same, although some such as wolfmother,the arctic monkeys and muse really stand out. i said that i was in a band to stress the fact that there is no way lil wayne's effort could even come close to what a band has to do in order to write good songs, and there many things which have to do with synchronization between members and the complexity of the songs themselves, not to mention the individual effort every member of the band has to make in order for all of them to reach a satisfying level Firstly, Tool would be considered a new band and bonobo is pretty new as well. Also if you think making beats is easy then you are grossly misinformed, and I believe you are probably exaggerating the effort it takes to create music in your band. I understand that it's not easy but generally when the melody of a song is lead by a single guitar the rest comes pretty easily. Furthermore while the bands you mentioned were "good music" it's difficult to see how you can so easily put them on a pedestal above other types of music. While alice in chains produce many emotionally fueled and powerful songs they failed to construct well flowing albums which ended up sounding like a collection of disjointed singles. And aerosmith can't be seen as anything more than a cock-rock band whose success was fueled by their half-assed rock ballads. this debate can really go on forever. i truly believe it's all about the message you send with your music,which is supposed to be a way of expressing art and one's feelings along with it, and i'm sure the bands i mentioned managed to do so quite well. i actually believe every album alice in chains has released with layne staley has a touch of its own, and more importantly, every song individually has that sheer raw power and energy i'm looking for when i listen to rock. fairly enough "facelift" was indeed the first album and didn't really have an identity of its own. "dirt" is just brutal in my opinion, and "tripod" is that dark, grim-themed album which closes the curtain on the band's activity. as for aerosmith, they have a special place in my hearth not because of those crappy new ballads, but because of their first albums which were mainly what rock'n'roll was supposed to be at that time. | ||
| #47 - well there's your problem, while you enjoyed older rap; im ass… [+] (7 new replies) | 20 hours ago on True... | +1 |
| The same can be said about a lot of "good music." Also you can't rely on only the lyrics having a message due to the vast abundance of lyricless instrumental music around. He spends a fair amount of time finding samples for his beats, practising his flow and writing somewhat "decent" lyrics. Also, if I may ask, what do you consider good music? well, after i quit listening to hip-hop i turned my attention towards older music, whatever that may be. so i slowly went towards rock music and i was absolutely blown out of my mind. there is just no way to compare the effort old artists put in to combine what is enjoyable to listen to with what is complex in music. so i sticked with bands and artists such as django reinhardt, jimi hendrix, miles davis, alice in chains, aerosmith, bonobo, tool, al green, the police etc. i tried listening to newer bands but i was kind of disappointed because they mainly sound the same, although some such as wolfmother,the arctic monkeys and muse really stand out. i said that i was in a band to stress the fact that there is no way lil wayne's effort could even come close to what a band has to do in order to write good songs, and there many things which have to do with synchronization between members and the complexity of the songs themselves, not to mention the individual effort every member of the band has to make in order for all of them to reach a satisfying level Firstly, Tool would be considered a new band and bonobo is pretty new as well. Also if you think making beats is easy then you are grossly misinformed, and I believe you are probably exaggerating the effort it takes to create music in your band. I understand that it's not easy but generally when the melody of a song is lead by a single guitar the rest comes pretty easily. Furthermore while the bands you mentioned were "good music" it's difficult to see how you can so easily put them on a pedestal above other types of music. While alice in chains produce many emotionally fueled and powerful songs they failed to construct well flowing albums which ended up sounding like a collection of disjointed singles. And aerosmith can't be seen as anything more than a cock-rock band whose success was fueled by their half-assed rock ballads. this debate can really go on forever. i truly believe it's all about the message you send with your music,which is supposed to be a way of expressing art and one's feelings along with it, and i'm sure the bands i mentioned managed to do so quite well. i actually believe every album alice in chains has released with layne staley has a touch of its own, and more importantly, every song individually has that sheer raw power and energy i'm looking for when i listen to rock. fairly enough "facelift" was indeed the first album and didn't really have an identity of its own. "dirt" is just brutal in my opinion, and "tripod" is that dark, grim-themed album which closes the curtain on the band's activity. as for aerosmith, they have a special place in my hearth not because of those crappy new ballads, but because of their first albums which were mainly what rock'n'roll was supposed to be at that time. | ||
| #45 - do you extensively listen to hip-hop? [+] (9 new replies) | 21 hours ago on True... | 0 |
| well there's your problem, while you enjoyed older rap; im assuming 2pac, biggie, dre etc you haven't adjusted well to the new-age stylings. It's like when people only listen to metallica and iron maiden and don't even touch newer metal because they're put off by bands like slipknot and linkin park. The same can be said about a lot of "good music." Also you can't rely on only the lyrics having a message due to the vast abundance of lyricless instrumental music around. He spends a fair amount of time finding samples for his beats, practising his flow and writing somewhat "decent" lyrics. Also, if I may ask, what do you consider good music? well, after i quit listening to hip-hop i turned my attention towards older music, whatever that may be. so i slowly went towards rock music and i was absolutely blown out of my mind. there is just no way to compare the effort old artists put in to combine what is enjoyable to listen to with what is complex in music. so i sticked with bands and artists such as django reinhardt, jimi hendrix, miles davis, alice in chains, aerosmith, bonobo, tool, al green, the police etc. i tried listening to newer bands but i was kind of disappointed because they mainly sound the same, although some such as wolfmother,the arctic monkeys and muse really stand out. i said that i was in a band to stress the fact that there is no way lil wayne's effort could even come close to what a band has to do in order to write good songs, and there many things which have to do with synchronization between members and the complexity of the songs themselves, not to mention the individual effort every member of the band has to make in order for all of them to reach a satisfying level Firstly, Tool would be considered a new band and bonobo is pretty new as well. Also if you think making beats is easy then you are grossly misinformed, and I believe you are probably exaggerating the effort it takes to create music in your band. I understand that it's not easy but generally when the melody of a song is lead by a single guitar the rest comes pretty easily. Furthermore while the bands you mentioned were "good music" it's difficult to see how you can so easily put them on a pedestal above other types of music. While alice in chains produce many emotionally fueled and powerful songs they failed to construct well flowing albums which ended up sounding like a collection of disjointed singles. And aerosmith can't be seen as anything more than a cock-rock band whose success was fueled by their half-assed rock ballads. this debate can really go on forever. i truly believe it's all about the message you send with your music,which is supposed to be a way of expressing art and one's feelings along with it, and i'm sure the bands i mentioned managed to do so quite well. i actually believe every album alice in chains has released with layne staley has a touch of its own, and more importantly, every song individually has that sheer raw power and energy i'm looking for when i listen to rock. fairly enough "facelift" was indeed the first album and didn't really have an identity of its own. "dirt" is just brutal in my opinion, and "tripod" is that dark, grim-themed album which closes the curtain on the band's activity. as for aerosmith, they have a special place in my hearth not because of those crappy new ballads, but because of their first albums which were mainly what rock'n'roll was supposed to be at that time. | ||
| #16 - silent hill: shattered memories? | 21 hours ago on Game Developers | +3 |
| #38 - Please give examples or stfu with your unqualified statements. | 21 hours ago on True... | +2 |
| #37 - "lol 2pac ftw lol only 2pac was good rapper ever1 else is… | 21 hours ago on True... | +2 |
| #36 - Most people hate lil wayne without even listening to his music… [+] (11 new replies) | 21 hours ago on True... | +11 |
| well there's your problem, while you enjoyed older rap; im assuming 2pac, biggie, dre etc you haven't adjusted well to the new-age stylings. It's like when people only listen to metallica and iron maiden and don't even touch newer metal because they're put off by bands like slipknot and linkin park. The same can be said about a lot of "good music." Also you can't rely on only the lyrics having a message due to the vast abundance of lyricless instrumental music around. He spends a fair amount of time finding samples for his beats, practising his flow and writing somewhat "decent" lyrics. Also, if I may ask, what do you consider good music? well, after i quit listening to hip-hop i turned my attention towards older music, whatever that may be. so i slowly went towards rock music and i was absolutely blown out of my mind. there is just no way to compare the effort old artists put in to combine what is enjoyable to listen to with what is complex in music. so i sticked with bands and artists such as django reinhardt, jimi hendrix, miles davis, alice in chains, aerosmith, bonobo, tool, al green, the police etc. i tried listening to newer bands but i was kind of disappointed because they mainly sound the same, although some such as wolfmother,the arctic monkeys and muse really stand out. i said that i was in a band to stress the fact that there is no way lil wayne's effort could even come close to what a band has to do in order to write good songs, and there many things which have to do with synchronization between members and the complexity of the songs themselves, not to mention the individual effort every member of the band has to make in order for all of them to reach a satisfying level Firstly, Tool would be considered a new band and bonobo is pretty new as well. Also if you think making beats is easy then you are grossly misinformed, and I believe you are probably exaggerating the effort it takes to create music in your band. I understand that it's not easy but generally when the melody of a song is lead by a single guitar the rest comes pretty easily. Furthermore while the bands you mentioned were "good music" it's difficult to see how you can so easily put them on a pedestal above other types of music. While alice in chains produce many emotionally fueled and powerful songs they failed to construct well flowing albums which ended up sounding like a collection of disjointed singles. And aerosmith can't be seen as anything more than a cock-rock band whose success was fueled by their half-assed rock ballads. this debate can really go on forever. i truly believe it's all about the message you send with your music,which is supposed to be a way of expressing art and one's feelings along with it, and i'm sure the bands i mentioned managed to do so quite well. i actually believe every album alice in chains has released with layne staley has a touch of its own, and more importantly, every song individually has that sheer raw power and energy i'm looking for when i listen to rock. fairly enough "facelift" was indeed the first album and didn't really have an identity of its own. "dirt" is just brutal in my opinion, and "tripod" is that dark, grim-themed album which closes the curtain on the band's activity. as for aerosmith, they have a special place in my hearth not because of those crappy new ballads, but because of their first albums which were mainly what rock'n'roll was supposed to be at that time. | ||
user's channels
user's friends
#29
-
N. Korean citizen (05/08/2013) [-]
Look at all those red thumbs on your comments. It really was a pleasure to see you dig yourself deeper. Nothing wrong with expressing your opinion, but as a word of advice, people wont go crazy if you don't shoot down their own opinion as wrong. Especially when it comes to the retarded little bitch argument you were having over the attractiveness of Emma Watson and Jennifer Lawrence.
However you seem like someone who is too pig-headed/stubborn to even consider another point of view other than that which you see as right, and that is why you will continue to alienate others.
Hope that helps :3
However you seem like someone who is too pig-headed/stubborn to even consider another point of view other than that which you see as right, and that is why you will continue to alienate others.
Hope that helps :3
#27
-
deadmauf (05/07/2013) [-]
props to you for telling those horny 14 year old kids the plain truth. but hey, this is the internet, puberty is OP on here...
also ponies suck and bronies cant get any better than a pony fantasy and fake brony friends..
also ponies suck and bronies cant get any better than a pony fantasy and fake brony friends..
#26
-
cruxes ONLINE (05/07/2013) [-]
You're so retararded I cry while reading your comments and watching your posts.
Hey. Could you post that Avatar comic where uncle Zuko is vacuuming the floor, please.
State one wrong fact, and get hundreds of - thumbs.
Welcome to FJ sir
Welcome to FJ sir
Hi guys, It's honesty time.
I don't actually think Justin Bieber is that bad when you compare him to people like Nicki Minaj, Ke$ha, Lil Wayne and whoever mad that shitty song "Like a G6." At least Bieber does have a little bit of talent and his career isn't built on parading himself around like a retarded oumpa-loumpa (unlike Nicki Minaj). I kinda think If he waited a bit for his voice to break and in the meantime maybe practised learning an instrument or how to write lyrics he would at least be another one of those pretty faces who although isn't that great is still considered a legitimate artist. My point is he has potential but just started at the wrong time which is probably what generated all of the hate.
I also don't think Hitler was really as bad as people made him out to be. He was definitely bad but he wasn't some super-villain, he was just portrayed that way because he lost. If he won he would've been portrayed as the glorious leader who single handedly defeated most of Europe and Russia and cleansed the earth of the evil Jew menace (as they would have been referred to in this scenario). Alas, history is written by the victors.
I also believe that atheist's are just as foolish as theist's as there is no evidence either way so both are simply believing something with no proof or "having faith" in their unsupported beliefs. I'm not meaning to call either side stupid but , at least for now, they are on pretty much equal grounds in terms or who is right and who is wrong.
I imagine some of you will disagree with some of (if not all) the things I've said so I don't blame anyone for thumbing me down and wouldn't be surprised if I got red thumbed to oblivion but I just wanted to let people know my opinion. I also realise that this probably isn't that related but I felt the need to get it off my chest so I came to a place with a large enough audience.
I don't actually think Justin Bieber is that bad when you compare him to people like Nicki Minaj, Ke$ha, Lil Wayne and whoever mad that shitty song "Like a G6." At least Bieber does have a little bit of talent and his career isn't built on parading himself around like a retarded oumpa-loumpa (unlike Nicki Minaj). I kinda think If he waited a bit for his voice to break and in the meantime maybe practised learning an instrument or how to write lyrics he would at least be another one of those pretty faces who although isn't that great is still considered a legitimate artist. My point is he has potential but just started at the wrong time which is probably what generated all of the hate.
I also don't think Hitler was really as bad as people made him out to be. He was definitely bad but he wasn't some super-villain, he was just portrayed that way because he lost. If he won he would've been portrayed as the glorious leader who single handedly defeated most of Europe and Russia and cleansed the earth of the evil Jew menace (as they would have been referred to in this scenario). Alas, history is written by the victors.
I also believe that atheist's are just as foolish as theist's as there is no evidence either way so both are simply believing something with no proof or "having faith" in their unsupported beliefs. I'm not meaning to call either side stupid but , at least for now, they are on pretty much equal grounds in terms or who is right and who is wrong.
I imagine some of you will disagree with some of (if not all) the things I've said so I don't blame anyone for thumbing me down and wouldn't be surprised if I got red thumbed to oblivion but I just wanted to let people know my opinion. I also realise that this probably isn't that related but I felt the need to get it off my chest so I came to a place with a large enough audience.
Hey brah, remind vas to come my house tomorrow at 1, also you are welcome to come
http://x.fap.to/images/full/29/203/2036819214.jpg
And here's the gallery
www.imagefap.com/photo/2036819214/#13
gallys.rk.com/cf/15/?id=hankgalleries2
Final bits of info:
>her name is lexi
>http://www.megacockcravers.com/main4.htm?id= <--She's featured here second to last on the page
>while I don't wanna burst your bubble the "13 inch cock" she craves is photoshopped.
>Also I think her full name is lexi matthews.
AND YOU'RE IN LUCK!!!
HERE'S A VIDEO:
www.realitykings.com/cum-fiesta/coy_toy/home.htm
HOWEVER YOU NEED TO BE A MEMBER BUT HERE ARE A FEW ACCOUNTS WITH PASSWORDS, THEY MIGHT NOT ALL WORK SO TRY THEM UNTIL ONE DOES (FIRST WORD IS ACCOUNT, SECOND IS PASSWORD):
cf2513 : vinson
jloric : brothers
skydstofte : rindum
12345 : 123456
nomin : 130376
rowme : rowmed
HERE'S A FREE VIDEO BUT IT'S LOWER QUALITY AND SHORTER, BUT IF YOU WANT TO AVOID THE HASSLE OF LOGGING IN JUST WATCH THIS ONE:
www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=coy%20toy%20lexi&source=video&cd=1&ved=0CDkQtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xvideos.com%2Fvideo54231%2Fcoy_toy_music_video_lexi_matthews_&ei=3ClnUNGrPISg0QWX4oCgBw&usg=AFQjCNHY-QysHzHnXMfBUr0BW2OWkFtTZg&cad=rja
OR SIMPLY SEARCH INTO GOOGLE, "LEXI COY TOY" AND FIND ONE.
LEXI COY TOY
AND YES OP, THIS DID TAKE ME A WHILE SO YOU ARE FUCKING WELCOME!
And here's the gallery
www.imagefap.com/photo/2036819214/#13
gallys.rk.com/cf/15/?id=hankgalleries2
Final bits of info:
>her name is lexi
>http://www.megacockcravers.com/main4.htm?id= <--She's featured here second to last on the page
>while I don't wanna burst your bubble the "13 inch cock" she craves is photoshopped.
>Also I think her full name is lexi matthews.
AND YOU'RE IN LUCK!!!
HERE'S A VIDEO:
www.realitykings.com/cum-fiesta/coy_toy/home.htm
HOWEVER YOU NEED TO BE A MEMBER BUT HERE ARE A FEW ACCOUNTS WITH PASSWORDS, THEY MIGHT NOT ALL WORK SO TRY THEM UNTIL ONE DOES (FIRST WORD IS ACCOUNT, SECOND IS PASSWORD):
cf2513 : vinson
jloric : brothers
skydstofte : rindum
12345 : 123456
nomin : 130376
rowme : rowmed
HERE'S A FREE VIDEO BUT IT'S LOWER QUALITY AND SHORTER, BUT IF YOU WANT TO AVOID THE HASSLE OF LOGGING IN JUST WATCH THIS ONE:
www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=coy%20toy%20lexi&source=video&cd=1&ved=0CDkQtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xvideos.com%2Fvideo54231%2Fcoy_toy_music_video_lexi_matthews_&ei=3ClnUNGrPISg0QWX4oCgBw&usg=AFQjCNHY-QysHzHnXMfBUr0BW2OWkFtTZg&cad=rja
OR SIMPLY SEARCH INTO GOOGLE, "LEXI COY TOY" AND FIND ONE.
LEXI COY TOY
AND YES OP, THIS DID TAKE ME A WHILE SO YOU ARE FUCKING WELCOME!

