Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

crilleballe    

Rank #12030 on Comments
no avatar Level 243 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to crilleballe Block crilleballe Invite crilleballe to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/10/2011
Last Login:9/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#12030
Highest Content Rank:#14233
Highest Comment Rank:#2182
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  112 ,  72
Comment Thumbs: 4381 total,  5507 ,  1126
Content Level Progress: 74.57% (44/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 243 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 244 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:8062
Times Content Favorited:5 times
Total Comments Made:1577
FJ Points:702

latest user's comments

#289 - A scientific law is something that humans created to explain t… 10/04/2013 on It's true 0
#284 - A scientific theory can be testable and repeatable and quite o… 10/04/2013 on It's true 0
#282 - A theory in science is well proven, testable and repeatable. … 10/04/2013 on It's true 0
#263 - Do you realize how many thing are theories? I can current… 10/04/2013 on It's true +1
#352 - First off: I never said that having faith is wrong. However, f…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
User avatar #362 - xdeathspawnx (10/03/2013) [-]
you are correct that Christianity as a whole does get a lot of unfair treatment. I definitely do not agree with the government making laws because of what any religion has to say. I think that you are completely justified in being upset that religion is forced into your life even though you don't

I would not call myself very religious at all. The closest thing I could use to describe myself would probably be an agnostic. However, I do believe that people should be able to believe anything they choose In my opinion forcing religion off of people is just as bad as forcing religion on people.

I don't disagree with many of your opinions, I just think that saying the burden of proof is on those who are religious is wrong. If people want to believe something based on no proof, than there is no burden on them, just like their is no burden on Atheist to justify why they don't follow any religion. (obviously this changes the second someone wants to change laws or say that their beliefs are facts and should be treated as such)
#189 - My bad, i misunderstood the word 'condemn'. I have certain… 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
#187 - Yes, that is something that BOTH sides do, and i would not c…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
#189 - crilleballe (10/03/2013) [-]
My bad, i misunderstood the word 'condemn'.
I have certaintly met atheists that condemns religion completely.
English is not my first language and i apologize.
#185 - While you put a sound statement, you're assuming that most rel… 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
#68 - Adding to the below comment. As the content stated, there is n…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
#131 - funnymanohword (10/03/2013) [-]
Not to be a dick, but I don't get how that analogy makes any sense in regard to faith and whatnot. I don't think people who have faith in life after death choose so because it's easier. I consider myself an Agnostic Theist, so I don't know what will happen after I die, but I don't think people who believe in an afterlife are just "settling" for something. Everyone goes through a period of questioning their beliefs and if they come out believing in an afterlife or whatnot, so be it.
#185 - crilleballe (10/03/2013) [-]
While you put a sound statement, you're assuming that most religious people choose to believe in life after death as their religious text describes it, without indoctrination on the slightest level. I was indoctrinated into the protestant christian belief of life after death and i live in scandinavia, one of the least religious regions of the earth.
My point is that children of religious people often, although not always, are taught a religious view on death, and thus they don't need to choose a view on their own.
Therefore it is comfortable as well as easy to not change your beliefs, no matter what you would change them to, although the least comforting one is probably the atheistic belief.
On a side note, do you think any currently religious people would believe in the same theory that they believe in now, if they never read their respective religious texts?
I believe that they would think like me, although i admit i cannot base that on a solid foundation.
The only neutral theory certaintly seems to be the one that just lets us die and rot.
#67 - Atheists don't have faith. I'm sorry to use such words, but fo… 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
#64 - The burden of proof is not on the one that doesn't believe god…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
User avatar #348 - xdeathspawnx (10/03/2013) [-]
The burden is actually on those who want to disprove god. If you want to tell someone that what they have faith in is wrong, than it is your burden to disprove them, not theirs to justify their beliefs to you. If you don't want to believe in what they do, then fine, but you have no right to call them wrong unless you have some proof to back you up. If there is no proof to deny something, than there is a possibility, no matter how small, that it is true.

As for the teapot analogy, I would not be able to disprove you, so I wouldn't have a problem with you believing it or basing you actions off what it says, as long as you don't break the law or disrespect others.
#352 - crilleballe (10/03/2013) [-]
First off: I never said that having faith is wrong. However, faith is in no way an argument for your gods factual existence. You say it is not their burden to justify their beliefs.
True, if they did not envoke laws based upon their beliefs, were state funded or got tax reductions, allowed people to share healthcare through marriage or printed their belief on currency. Don't friggin base laws regarding everyone on the beliefs of only someone, especially when it is statistically proven to reduce intelligence and quality of living conditions. If all christians, or any other religious group, did not affect my daily life, i couldn't care less about what they believe. You need to reason to me, why a country should make laws based off the rules of your book, written millenias ago, when it is clearly not beneficial.
Second off: You clearly didn't understand the teapot analogy as it is created exactly to say that even though there is an ever so slim chance that something could be true, such as a teapot orbiting mars or a god controlling everything, it does not give a reason to believe that. If i were clear enough to specify enough details of enough complexity, i could argue that anything is possible.
User avatar #362 - xdeathspawnx (10/03/2013) [-]
you are correct that Christianity as a whole does get a lot of unfair treatment. I definitely do not agree with the government making laws because of what any religion has to say. I think that you are completely justified in being upset that religion is forced into your life even though you don't

I would not call myself very religious at all. The closest thing I could use to describe myself would probably be an agnostic. However, I do believe that people should be able to believe anything they choose In my opinion forcing religion off of people is just as bad as forcing religion on people.

I don't disagree with many of your opinions, I just think that saying the burden of proof is on those who are religious is wrong. If people want to believe something based on no proof, than there is no burden on them, just like their is no burden on Atheist to justify why they don't follow any religion. (obviously this changes the second someone wants to change laws or say that their beliefs are facts and should be treated as such)
User avatar #261 - malhaloc (10/03/2013) [-]
I do. I'm not saying not to not believe. Thats your choice. Just don't call me an idiot for not having proof when you're doing the same thing. That's all I meant. I have friends from other ways of life. I've known muslims, atheists, hindus, and even a couple witches, pagans, and wiccans. I dont agree with what they do, especially the last 3 but I was never an ass about it. And they never were either. But when someone goes full retard and starts insulting people for believing in something they dont and with no more proof than the other person to back their claim, it just seems hypocritical whether you believe in no god, one god, or a thousand.
#61 - I know that one of the reasons is that many christians think t…  [+] (12 new replies) 10/03/2013 on It's not okay. 0
User avatar #183 - skubasteve (10/03/2013) [-]
Kind of like how many atheists make mass generalizations with no source of credibility, only to condemn those that do the same thing.
User avatar #235 - TexMex (10/03/2013) [-]
You can't say "many atheists" atheists aren't a group of people. It's not being in a group of people, It's what everyone is before they're introduced to religion. You yourself have been an atheist.
User avatar #238 - skubasteve (10/03/2013) [-]
Yea I did just say it. And yes the point I was trying to make went right over your head.
User avatar #243 - TexMex (10/03/2013) [-]
I don't know if you're joking but saying "many atheists" is like saying "many bald guys" It doesn't make sense. Atheists have no relation to one another.. What I'm trying to say is that you should learn the definition of the word "atheist"
User avatar #246 - skubasteve (10/03/2013) [-]
And what I am doing is ignoring your point just like you ignored mine.
User avatar #250 - TexMex (10/03/2013) [-]
I'm not discussing your point, it's very much true, I'm saying you should express yourself better. If I said "Many bald guys hate religious people", what sense what that make?
User avatar #256 - skubasteve (10/03/2013) [-]
You seem hell bent on me understanding that "athiests" aren't one singular group or organization. No fucking shit.

Hence my reference in my first post that mass generalizations are stupid.
User avatar #259 - TexMex (10/03/2013) [-]
So why did you say "some atheists"
User avatar #262 - skubasteve (10/03/2013) [-]
Because I knew it would piss you off
User avatar #264 - TexMex (10/03/2013) [-]
Ok, thanks
#187 - crilleballe (10/03/2013) [-]
Yes, that is something that BOTH sides do, and i would not consider anyone who does that credible or worth listening to and certaintly not worth reflecting upon.
I have actually met many atheists, that make mass generalizations, and i completely agree that it is a problem. I have however never met any atheist that condemns religion.
#189 - crilleballe (10/03/2013) [-]
My bad, i misunderstood the word 'condemn'.
I have certaintly met atheists that condemns religion completely.
English is not my first language and i apologize.
#17 - I happen to disagree 10/02/2013 on Life... +3
#5 - Almost all gods ever described feature qualities that make the… 09/26/2013 on Atheism vs Theism 0
#45 - SCP-076 is "able" and it is killable, just really ha… 09/24/2013 on What the fuck is this!? 0
#6 - I'm sorry  [+] (1 new reply) 09/23/2013 on Gut JUB 0
#7 - theaveragetard (09/23/2013) [-]
It's okay, don't worry. Here's a cat gif for you
#4 - Picture  [+] (3 new replies) 09/23/2013 on Gut JUB +2
User avatar #5 - theaveragetard (09/23/2013) [-]
Auschwitz*
#6 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
I'm sorry
#7 - theaveragetard (09/23/2013) [-]
It's okay, don't worry. Here's a cat gif for you
#60 - No, really, that's pretty ******* nice. In t…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/23/2013 on sweet, sweet hypocrisy 0
User avatar #61 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
I always carry with me a pepper spray, that's the only weapon I've got. But yes, I am ready to fight if if comes to that. I know how to, and chances are, they don't.
#63 - teranin (09/23/2013) [-]
the name "high hopes" is very accurate for you. I hope you never end up in such a situation.
#58 - Wear whatever you want, it's perfectly fine, noone has to resp…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/23/2013 on sweet, sweet hypocrisy 0
User avatar #59 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
Because I know how to defend myself, something I don't think men realize about me, because I look like an easy target. And if I get them down, something I'm pretty sure I'll do if it's one of two, I won't stop until they stop moving.
#60 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
No, really, that's pretty fucking nice.
In that case you have reason to feel safe, and may freely roam, a luxury that not a lot of women have, or have not cared to get.
Thus you are unlike most women,whom will often not be able to defend themselves and at times, i'm afraid, assailants will be armed with a weapon.
Do you think you'd be prepared to defend yourself against an assailant armed with a firearm / knife?
User avatar #61 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
I always carry with me a pepper spray, that's the only weapon I've got. But yes, I am ready to fight if if comes to that. I know how to, and chances are, they don't.
#63 - teranin (09/23/2013) [-]
the name "high hopes" is very accurate for you. I hope you never end up in such a situation.
#55 - I completely agree, but i wonder if you know what a metaphor i…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/23/2013 on sweet, sweet hypocrisy 0
User avatar #56 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
Yes, I did get your metaphor, although not the part with the insurance?

And I'll dress in whatever I want. Like I said, if someone can't respect that, and they'll try to rape me, it _ will_ be their loss and my pleasure.
#58 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
Wear whatever you want, it's perfectly fine, noone has to respect what clothes you wear, in order for it to be acceptable. Just be wary that it has an effect in the case that you should fall infront of the eyes of a rapist, especially if you happen to be in a situati..... ... wait...

" it _ will_ be their loss and my pleasure. "

What?!?
User avatar #59 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
Because I know how to defend myself, something I don't think men realize about me, because I look like an easy target. And if I get them down, something I'm pretty sure I'll do if it's one of two, I won't stop until they stop moving.
#60 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
No, really, that's pretty fucking nice.
In that case you have reason to feel safe, and may freely roam, a luxury that not a lot of women have, or have not cared to get.
Thus you are unlike most women,whom will often not be able to defend themselves and at times, i'm afraid, assailants will be armed with a weapon.
Do you think you'd be prepared to defend yourself against an assailant armed with a firearm / knife?
User avatar #61 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
I always carry with me a pepper spray, that's the only weapon I've got. But yes, I am ready to fight if if comes to that. I know how to, and chances are, they don't.
#63 - teranin (09/23/2013) [-]
the name "high hopes" is very accurate for you. I hope you never end up in such a situation.
#51 - If you leave your house with all doors and windows open, it's …  [+] (8 new replies) 09/23/2013 on sweet, sweet hypocrisy 0
User avatar #52 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
And then there's this huge difference between ruining a person's life and steal a few material stuff you can easily replace.
#55 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
I completely agree, but i wonder if you know what a metaphor is?
Not trying to make your point any less valid.
If you let your door stay open when you go on vacation, you should be fine. Most people will not enter your house or steal anything, however, there are people who are criminal in mind, and will most certainly seize the opportunity.
Same way, you SHOULD be just fine walking around in suggestive clothing while drunk at night, but reality is that you just won't be safe.
Of course there are criminals that will just break in through a locked door, as well as people who will attempt, and sadly often succeed, in raping people in seemingly safe environments.
What i meant with my metaphor is that, although it's always illegal to commit crime, it can't be completely avoided. So, just like it's a bad idea to leave your house unlocked, it's not always safe to be out at night, in bad areas of bad cities, not for girls and not for guys either, you could get mugged, you could get raped.
Dressing suggestively and being drunk increases the risk of getting raped, it does not make it legal or acceptable. Do what you want, but i suggest trying to not increase that risk to unsafe levels unneccesarily.
User avatar #56 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
Yes, I did get your metaphor, although not the part with the insurance?

And I'll dress in whatever I want. Like I said, if someone can't respect that, and they'll try to rape me, it _ will_ be their loss and my pleasure.
#58 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
Wear whatever you want, it's perfectly fine, noone has to respect what clothes you wear, in order for it to be acceptable. Just be wary that it has an effect in the case that you should fall infront of the eyes of a rapist, especially if you happen to be in a situati..... ... wait...

" it _ will_ be their loss and my pleasure. "

What?!?
User avatar #59 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
Because I know how to defend myself, something I don't think men realize about me, because I look like an easy target. And if I get them down, something I'm pretty sure I'll do if it's one of two, I won't stop until they stop moving.
#60 - crilleballe (09/23/2013) [-]
No, really, that's pretty fucking nice.
In that case you have reason to feel safe, and may freely roam, a luxury that not a lot of women have, or have not cared to get.
Thus you are unlike most women,whom will often not be able to defend themselves and at times, i'm afraid, assailants will be armed with a weapon.
Do you think you'd be prepared to defend yourself against an assailant armed with a firearm / knife?
User avatar #61 - highhopes (09/23/2013) [-]
I always carry with me a pepper spray, that's the only weapon I've got. But yes, I am ready to fight if if comes to that. I know how to, and chances are, they don't.
#63 - teranin (09/23/2013) [-]
the name "high hopes" is very accurate for you. I hope you never end up in such a situation.
#67 - Japan only strike Hawaii once, and that's it, but Americans dr… 09/18/2013 on Join Te Army 0
#7 - Even 4chan has reposts.  [+] (5 new replies) 09/17/2013 on Piss Pals +59
User avatar #53 - dongers (09/17/2013) [-]
yea, they are called copy pastas
#41 - arandomanon (09/17/2013) [-]
Yeah that's why pictures like this one exist.
#29 - kesolukt (09/17/2013) [-]
"Even 4chan"
#26 - Gedziuzzz (09/17/2013) [-]
"1)Piss under door"
#21 - smbiosis (09/17/2013) [-]
>even 4chan has reposts.


Almost the entirety of 4chan is reposts. If you thought this site was bad... hoo boy.
#520 - This stuff is actually scary to watch. This guy just … 09/13/2013 on Humans are badass +2
#3 - emo cry.jpg Yeah, this guy is a troll  [+] (1 new reply) 09/10/2013 on 4chin +2
User avatar #7 - jubnik (09/11/2013) [-]
clever, i would not have thought to check that

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #19 - revengeforfreeze (02/06/2014) [-]
snel kat
sita i kne
gosa me
#9 - fishyxander **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#11 to #12 - fishyxander **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #5 - rustyshakleford (03/18/2012) [-]
Re....removed? :(
#6 to #7 - crilleballe (03/18/2012) [-]
Yea, no hate intended. But i don't know you bro :/
#7 to #8 - rustyshakleford (03/18/2012) [-]
But it's me, the amazing rusty shakleford!
#8 to #9 - crilleballe (03/18/2012) [-]
I see..
Still i'm not really interested in talking to anyone unless it's about the topic of a post...
User avatar #3 - NiNJAz (06/28/2011) [-]
you can delete all this **** if you want lol,
i commented on the wrong person sorry.
#4 to #4 - crilleballe (06/28/2011) [-]
No problem.
#2 - NiNJAz has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - NiNJAz has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)