Upload
Login or register

crilleballe

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/10/2011
Stats
Comment Ranking:#14818
Highest Content Rank:#14233
Highest Comment Rank:#2182
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  112 ,  72
Comment Thumbs: 5279 total,  6445 ,  1166
Content Level Progress: 74.57% (44/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:8093
Total Comments Made:1670
FJ Points:1346

latest user's comments

#33 - Would you be rude to people if it was not for your church? …  [+] (2 replies) 09/14/2014 on (untitled) -2
User avatar
#34 - churchofmagcargo (09/14/2014) [-]
i dont thin you saw my name
#35 - crilleballe (09/14/2014) [-]
I did not at the time, no
I realize now that your comment may have been a spoof and apologize for misinterpreting it.
#14 - The human eye cannot see more than 24-26 fps actually, anythin…  [+] (2 replies) 08/15/2014 on READ DESC -1
User avatar
#35 - cuntism (08/15/2014) [-]
How can you think that with such overwhelming evidence ?

The human eye can discern a HUGE amount of detail, and higher refresh rates mean more detail can be fit into a time frame - the higher the refresh rate, means the higher amount of frames, which means less possibility of noticing motion blur
User avatar
#31 - thenez (08/15/2014) [-]
Complete bullshit, take a window on your computer screen and drag it around real fast, and observe the artifacting that results because the monitor is only 60fps.
#6 - Next gen fish AI 08/08/2014 on Neat +78
#3 - Join us, very excite 08/08/2014 on Why? +3
#540 - Is.. that... a shark? Norway's fjords must be more dangero…  [+] (1 reply) 07/20/2014 on Answer this 0
User avatar
#594 - norrus (07/20/2014) [-]
yeah, its a shark. i was fishing at a lake (mjøsa)