Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

craigdavid *Banned*   

no avatar Level -318 Comment: apprentice dark lord
Offline
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/03/2012
Last Login:7/10/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Ban reason:posting nsfw
Banned By:admin
Content Thumbs: 28 total,  0 ,  28
Comment Thumbs: 1774 total,  0 ,  1774
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -28 Content: Sort of disliked → Level -27 Content: Sort of disliked
Comment Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level -318 Comment: apprentice dark lord → Level -317 Comment: apprentice dark lord
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1286
Total Comments Made:1389
FJ Points:0

latest user's comments

#88 - but i would never have bought the game, i would have gone to m… 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
#85 - 1 Basic definition of theft. (1)A person is guilty of…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #87 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
you permanently deprived them of the money they would have made if you bought the game.
#89 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
IF i bought the game

which i would not have done

i don't generally pay for things made by big corporations BECAUSE they dont need the money, except shoes. i buy nike shoes cos theyre decent quality but i digress, the fact of the matter is they arent losing anything, if a girl was going to have sex with me and you were my best mate then you fucked her twin sister and as a result the original girl refused to have sex with me because of that, could i accuse you of having stolen my shag?
User avatar #90 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
No but if you ended up just taking her twin and keeping her locked in your basement that would be kidnapping. You couldn't just be like "OI! But th' 'riginals right bluddy there!" theyd still be like, "Yæh bro, your buttholes gonna be relentlessly mashed in prison."
#91 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
you kinda missed my point there, if i took her twin to the basement itd be mroe akin to kidnapping than theft
#84 - but if noone loses anything how have i stolen? 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
#83 - someone else could've bought that lighter though if you'd copi…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #86 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
see, this is the nonsensical part of your argument. No game is ever the original. They make their money by selling copies. No one would have bought the digital copy you stole, but no one would have bought the one you bought. But you have the game without paying for it. That's theft.
#88 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but i would never have bought the game, i would have gone to my friends house who has already played the game and played it there. all it does is save me the effort of going down the street to play it for free
#81 - and im saying its wrong to call it theft when my actions affect noone  [+] (2 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #82 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
its still theft regardless of the consequence.
#84 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but if noone loses anything how have i stolen?
#1 - 'it's so hot when he wears his pants at the correct height' -n… 10/13/2013 on Oh baby. 0
#78 - i think thats most probably the general gist of it tb…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #80 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
im not saying its wrong, im saying its theft.
#81 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
and im saying its wrong to call it theft when my actions affect noone
User avatar #82 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
its still theft regardless of the consequence.
#84 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but if noone loses anything how have i stolen?
#76 - but im stealing nothing due to the fac ti wouldnt have paid fo…  [+] (9 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #79 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
how does your lack of willingness to pay not make it theft? I find a need to have lighters all the time, so i go into walmart and take one. I never had any intention of paying. But I took am currently using it. Guess I didn't steal that lighter after all.
#85 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
1 Basic definition of theft.

(1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.

(2)It is immaterial whether the appropriation is made with a view to gain, or is made for the thief’s own benefit.

(3)The five following sections of this Act shall have effect as regards the interpretation and operation of this section (and, except as otherwise provided by this Act, shall apply only for purposes of this section).


that is the british legal definition of theft found here: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/crossheading/definition-of-theft

note how it says with the intention of PERMANENTLY DEPRIVING the other of said item. i am depriving an artist or company nothing by pirating ergo by legal definition in britain i am not a theif
User avatar #87 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
you permanently deprived them of the money they would have made if you bought the game.
#89 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
IF i bought the game

which i would not have done

i don't generally pay for things made by big corporations BECAUSE they dont need the money, except shoes. i buy nike shoes cos theyre decent quality but i digress, the fact of the matter is they arent losing anything, if a girl was going to have sex with me and you were my best mate then you fucked her twin sister and as a result the original girl refused to have sex with me because of that, could i accuse you of having stolen my shag?
User avatar #90 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
No but if you ended up just taking her twin and keeping her locked in your basement that would be kidnapping. You couldn't just be like "OI! But th' 'riginals right bluddy there!" theyd still be like, "Yæh bro, your buttholes gonna be relentlessly mashed in prison."
#91 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
you kinda missed my point there, if i took her twin to the basement itd be mroe akin to kidnapping than theft
#83 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
someone else could've bought that lighter though if you'd copied the lighter and left the original in place, it would not be theft would it? howwever you have taken the original lighter and stolen the value of whatever it would have cost from walamart, where as if i copy a game via piracy the original is still present
User avatar #86 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
see, this is the nonsensical part of your argument. No game is ever the original. They make their money by selling copies. No one would have bought the digital copy you stole, but no one would have bought the one you bought. But you have the game without paying for it. That's theft.
#88 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but i would never have bought the game, i would have gone to my friends house who has already played the game and played it there. all it does is save me the effort of going down the street to play it for free
#75 - i didnt steal **** from the production team i sto…  [+] (6 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #77 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
oh god we both high as fuck...


So you're just sittin in Britain like "Whut th' bluhdy hell is this faggot gon' say next?"

and I'm here in America like "What the fuck is this faggot gonna say next?"

Which we both proceed to take a big bong rip and figure out?

#78 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
i think thats most probably the general gist of it

tbh i think im trying to argue about the morality of classifying piracy as stealing

or some shit close to that im basically saying i wanna pirate things without people telling me its wrong
User avatar #80 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
im not saying its wrong, im saying its theft.
#81 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
and im saying its wrong to call it theft when my actions affect noone
User avatar #82 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
its still theft regardless of the consequence.
#84 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but if noone loses anything how have i stolen?
#14 - protip: admin's trying to **** with everyone. the…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/13/2013 on To whom it may concern,... 0
User avatar #17 - TheHutchie (10/13/2013) [-]
Every day he seems more like an actual Kim-Jong.
#1 - the **** website you get the phrase upvote from?  [+] (2 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Marty! We've got to go back! 0
User avatar #2 - itemexchange (10/13/2013) [-]
reddit i think
#3 - craigdavid (10/14/2013) [-]
naw, liftin shit with the reddit lingo etc is not cool
#15 - cr1tikal: holy flying **** dicking nipular tortur… 10/13/2013 on Uncorruptible YouTuber 0
#72 - they willingly gave their time and recieved pay, the makers of…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #74 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
You actually sound like a fucking moron to me. Actually more like a child that won't admit he's done something wrong. You stole that game, bro. Don't let the guilt consume you, but it did. Get over it, faggot. And when you realize that your food and people are shit, you can come to America, we'll even put a camera on you to make you feel famous. ;)
#71 - my computer cant ******* run skyrim and …  [+] (8 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #73 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
That last bit didn't even make sense. My argument isn't about the morality of pirating, its the classification as theft. Because it is. You did impact someone's life. The people on the programing team didn't make the money they would have if you would have bought the game. Your computer can't run skyrim? Sucks to be you, you still stole the game. So did I. Like 4 times. Who cares? No one. But its still theft.
#75 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
i didnt steal shit from the production team i stole nothing from anybody because i wouldnt have paid for it as it is, and im not taking a physical copy so it isnt a copy someone else could have had but now cannot. if they were never going to recieve money from me then they havent lost anything, as my having a copy of the game on my hardrive inhibits noone in paying for it

also i wrote that last comment while considerably higher than i am right now so thatll be why
User avatar #77 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
oh god we both high as fuck...


So you're just sittin in Britain like "Whut th' bluhdy hell is this faggot gon' say next?"

and I'm here in America like "What the fuck is this faggot gonna say next?"

Which we both proceed to take a big bong rip and figure out?

#78 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
i think thats most probably the general gist of it

tbh i think im trying to argue about the morality of classifying piracy as stealing

or some shit close to that im basically saying i wanna pirate things without people telling me its wrong
User avatar #80 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
im not saying its wrong, im saying its theft.
#81 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
and im saying its wrong to call it theft when my actions affect noone
User avatar #82 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
its still theft regardless of the consequence.
#84 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but if noone loses anything how have i stolen?
#70 - cry me a ****** river, the guys rich enough that …  [+] (4 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
#92 - mrmamric (10/13/2013) [-]
So I suppose the more rich someone is, the more you're allowed to take without permission? Because, "They don't even need it anyway"?
#93 - craigdavid (10/14/2013) [-]
yep
#94 - mrmamric (10/14/2013) [-]
Cute.
#95 - craigdavid (10/16/2013) [-]
ikr

on a real though its similar to jessie j saying its not about the money, if an artist claims they do stuff for the fans, they have no right to bitch about torrenting, illegal downloading etc

if they came out straight and just went yeah i want my fucking cash id have respect for that. id still torrent their music if i wanted it but id feel innocent for a different reason
#246 - i didnt read the damn article i assumed it was retarded cos th… 10/13/2013 on 'We Invented Jesus Christ' 0
#3 - implying glasgow isnt the mos eisley of glasgow  [+] (2 new replies) 10/13/2013 on Windmill 0
User avatar #4 - bacontrips (10/13/2013) [-]
#5 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
point taken
#26 - however i have stolen nothing that can physically be held in a…  [+] (11 new replies) 10/11/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
User avatar #28 - lemonsixx (10/11/2013) [-]
The coding and programs that make up the game are as physical as cable television, but people can steal that. You don't own those programs, those codes, you can purchase a copy or you can steal a copy that you keep on you rcomputer. The companies make enough money off the games regardless of what you do. I don't care if you pirate, I do. Just admit you're stealing something. Because you are.
#76 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but im stealing nothing due to the fac ti wouldnt have paid for it one way or the other, and my 'stealing' a digital copy of a game doesnt stop anybody else purchasing said game, ergo i have taken nothing from anybody. a.k.a the exact opposite of theft in which you take something from someone
User avatar #79 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
how does your lack of willingness to pay not make it theft? I find a need to have lighters all the time, so i go into walmart and take one. I never had any intention of paying. But I took am currently using it. Guess I didn't steal that lighter after all.
#85 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
1 Basic definition of theft.

(1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.

(2)It is immaterial whether the appropriation is made with a view to gain, or is made for the thief’s own benefit.

(3)The five following sections of this Act shall have effect as regards the interpretation and operation of this section (and, except as otherwise provided by this Act, shall apply only for purposes of this section).


that is the british legal definition of theft found here: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/crossheading/definition-of-theft

note how it says with the intention of PERMANENTLY DEPRIVING the other of said item. i am depriving an artist or company nothing by pirating ergo by legal definition in britain i am not a theif
User avatar #87 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
you permanently deprived them of the money they would have made if you bought the game.
#89 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
IF i bought the game

which i would not have done

i don't generally pay for things made by big corporations BECAUSE they dont need the money, except shoes. i buy nike shoes cos theyre decent quality but i digress, the fact of the matter is they arent losing anything, if a girl was going to have sex with me and you were my best mate then you fucked her twin sister and as a result the original girl refused to have sex with me because of that, could i accuse you of having stolen my shag?
User avatar #90 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
No but if you ended up just taking her twin and keeping her locked in your basement that would be kidnapping. You couldn't just be like "OI! But th' 'riginals right bluddy there!" theyd still be like, "Yæh bro, your buttholes gonna be relentlessly mashed in prison."
#91 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
you kinda missed my point there, if i took her twin to the basement itd be mroe akin to kidnapping than theft
#83 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
someone else could've bought that lighter though if you'd copied the lighter and left the original in place, it would not be theft would it? howwever you have taken the original lighter and stolen the value of whatever it would have cost from walamart, where as if i copy a game via piracy the original is still present
User avatar #86 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
see, this is the nonsensical part of your argument. No game is ever the original. They make their money by selling copies. No one would have bought the digital copy you stole, but no one would have bought the one you bought. But you have the game without paying for it. That's theft.
#88 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but i would never have bought the game, i would have gone to my friends house who has already played the game and played it there. all it does is save me the effort of going down the street to play it for free
#146 - the main religion was multitheistic ergo multiple temples. yan…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/11/2013 on 'We Invented Jesus Christ' 0
User avatar #151 - traelos (10/11/2013) [-]
I think you're mistaking the very small but loud area looking for a messiah to come save them (Judea) for the very large area that you clearly don't understand at all (The Roman Empire).

This guy's theory is that Christianity was invented to pacify the Jews, not anyone else.

And trust me, you don't understand the Roman Empire as a bigger picture.
#246 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
i didnt read the damn article i assumed it was retarded cos theres a screenshot of it on funnyjunk, im pitching my own theory and you claimed that people regularly travelled across the entirety of the roman empire to the point where news was spread by people other than travelling merchants, so i clearly have a better understanding than you
#144 - dude youre pretty wrong here. evidence points towards it beign…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/11/2013 on 'We Invented Jesus Christ' 0
User avatar #145 - traelos (10/11/2013) [-]
a) Regardless of the why, the how is still downright ridiculous

b) Christianity was the only religion in Roman history to ever be persecuted, the Roman's were very religiously tolerant

c) The Romans made money from donations to their pantheon, so creating Christianity would actually lose them money

d) There was only one major religion in the area until Christianity came around

e) Morals such as ignore any law that contradicts the bible?

Beyond the fact that Christianity isn't a very pacifying religion that wouldn't be a very Roman thing to do at all anyway.

Seriously, you're fucking insane.
#146 - craigdavid (10/11/2013) [-]
the main religion was multitheistic ergo multiple temples. yano mercury being messenger of the gods, and oh yeah i can see how poor the roman catholic church is. Imean just look at the vatican. worse than somalia in there :/

and it doesnt seem that the only religion to be persecuted and subsequently recieve sympathy and attention is the one that got adopted is a little suspicious?

fucking hell man im not saying its for sure but you have to at the VERY least admit its a valid possibility
User avatar #151 - traelos (10/11/2013) [-]
I think you're mistaking the very small but loud area looking for a messiah to come save them (Judea) for the very large area that you clearly don't understand at all (The Roman Empire).

This guy's theory is that Christianity was invented to pacify the Jews, not anyone else.

And trust me, you don't understand the Roman Empire as a bigger picture.
#246 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
i didnt read the damn article i assumed it was retarded cos theres a screenshot of it on funnyjunk, im pitching my own theory and you claimed that people regularly travelled across the entirety of the roman empire to the point where news was spread by people other than travelling merchants, so i clearly have a better understanding than you
#22 - in what way is pirating bad. I dont pirate games i pirate musi…  [+] (6 new replies) 10/11/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
#34 - mrmamric (10/11/2013) [-]
Oh, is little Pete already privileged enough? Does his mommy and daddy already give him a big enough allowance? If you think someone's success is a reason to pirate something of theirs, then you're a damned fool. Dr. Dre has actually made something that people like, that's why he's so rich. That's how our system works and if people like you didn't abuse it then the people that actually produce in our society would have the money they deserve and the little maggots that feed off other people's success would die in the dark.
#70 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
cry me a fuckin river, the guys rich enough that he can buy a car then drive it off a bridge, pay his hopsital bills and get some expensive surgery that isnt available to us mortals then if he feels like it do it all again. i aint taking shit all from him or any other multinational corporation whose product i copied. i. aint. stealing. shit.

also since when did piracy ruin the whole system. the systems ruined by the fact that people like justin bieber and one direction can get famous and rich purely through marketing. the only reason those pricks are so rich and decent artists are stuck touring small bars and shit is because the easiest markets these days are the ones that spend their parents money. Besides the main way for artists to earn money these days i by playing shows anyway, not selling albums. That stopped being very profitable a longgggggg time ago. so tell me again how little p diddys son doesnt get his island in the bahamas this xmas because of piracy.

also dr dre's name is most definitely not pete
#92 - mrmamric (10/13/2013) [-]
So I suppose the more rich someone is, the more you're allowed to take without permission? Because, "They don't even need it anyway"?
#93 - craigdavid (10/14/2013) [-]
yep
#94 - mrmamric (10/14/2013) [-]
Cute.
#95 - craigdavid (10/16/2013) [-]
ikr

on a real though its similar to jessie j saying its not about the money, if an artist claims they do stuff for the fans, they have no right to bitch about torrenting, illegal downloading etc

if they came out straight and just went yeah i want my fucking cash id have respect for that. id still torrent their music if i wanted it but id feel innocent for a different reason
#21 - how the **** is pirating stealing. It's copying. …  [+] (17 new replies) 10/11/2013 on Apple's Graphical User... 0
#47 - angelusprimus (10/11/2013) [-]
You are right. Pirating isn't stealing.
Its slavery.
If one person does the work, other person benefits from that work but does not recompense the first person for the work, its explotation or slavery.
When we pay for things we pay for them with hours of our lives. If you make 8 dollars an hour, game costs 40 dollars you work for five hours to buy the game. Game costs you 5 hours of your life.
When you copy the game without paying for it, you didn't steal the game. You took product of other people's work. It takes around 200.000 man hours to make a game.
What you do is say "Fuck you, 200.000 of hours of your lives, isn't worth 5 of mine. Because I'm that much more valuable then you are."
In effect treating people who produced the game as your slaves.
User avatar #63 - lemonsixx (10/12/2013) [-]
THIS
#72 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
they willingly gave their time and recieved pay, the makers of the game lose out on nothing because they recieve a wage for the amount of hours they work A BIT LIKE ME. so when i take a game what im saying to the corporation that pockets the profits is yeah imma just go and take the effort you paid for people to put in and enjoy it seeing as how they are in no way dependent upon my money for a living. so it is in NO way slavery

fucking moron tryna compare piracy to slavery. who the flying fuck are you the cyber police?
User avatar #74 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
You actually sound like a fucking moron to me. Actually more like a child that won't admit he's done something wrong. You stole that game, bro. Don't let the guilt consume you, but it did. Get over it, faggot. And when you realize that your food and people are shit, you can come to America, we'll even put a camera on you to make you feel famous. ;)
User avatar #25 - lemonsixx (10/11/2013) [-]
thats not at all the same thing. that statement if fucking stupid. the games being sold at the store are copies of the original. they make money for the months of work and effort they put into their project by selling the copies. and if you have an unpurchased copy, that is theft.
#26 - craigdavid (10/11/2013) [-]
however i have stolen nothing that can physically be held in anyones hands. its potential money that they could have had provided my mate didnt lend me the game, oir i didnt decide to actually steal it
User avatar #28 - lemonsixx (10/11/2013) [-]
The coding and programs that make up the game are as physical as cable television, but people can steal that. You don't own those programs, those codes, you can purchase a copy or you can steal a copy that you keep on you rcomputer. The companies make enough money off the games regardless of what you do. I don't care if you pirate, I do. Just admit you're stealing something. Because you are.
#76 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but im stealing nothing due to the fac ti wouldnt have paid for it one way or the other, and my 'stealing' a digital copy of a game doesnt stop anybody else purchasing said game, ergo i have taken nothing from anybody. a.k.a the exact opposite of theft in which you take something from someone
User avatar #79 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
how does your lack of willingness to pay not make it theft? I find a need to have lighters all the time, so i go into walmart and take one. I never had any intention of paying. But I took am currently using it. Guess I didn't steal that lighter after all.
#85 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
1 Basic definition of theft.

(1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.

(2)It is immaterial whether the appropriation is made with a view to gain, or is made for the thief’s own benefit.

(3)The five following sections of this Act shall have effect as regards the interpretation and operation of this section (and, except as otherwise provided by this Act, shall apply only for purposes of this section).


that is the british legal definition of theft found here: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/crossheading/definition-of-theft

note how it says with the intention of PERMANENTLY DEPRIVING the other of said item. i am depriving an artist or company nothing by pirating ergo by legal definition in britain i am not a theif
User avatar #87 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
you permanently deprived them of the money they would have made if you bought the game.
#89 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
IF i bought the game

which i would not have done

i don't generally pay for things made by big corporations BECAUSE they dont need the money, except shoes. i buy nike shoes cos theyre decent quality but i digress, the fact of the matter is they arent losing anything, if a girl was going to have sex with me and you were my best mate then you fucked her twin sister and as a result the original girl refused to have sex with me because of that, could i accuse you of having stolen my shag?
User avatar #90 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
No but if you ended up just taking her twin and keeping her locked in your basement that would be kidnapping. You couldn't just be like "OI! But th' 'riginals right bluddy there!" theyd still be like, "Yæh bro, your buttholes gonna be relentlessly mashed in prison."
#91 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
you kinda missed my point there, if i took her twin to the basement itd be mroe akin to kidnapping than theft
#83 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
someone else could've bought that lighter though if you'd copied the lighter and left the original in place, it would not be theft would it? howwever you have taken the original lighter and stolen the value of whatever it would have cost from walamart, where as if i copy a game via piracy the original is still present
User avatar #86 - lemonsixx (10/13/2013) [-]
see, this is the nonsensical part of your argument. No game is ever the original. They make their money by selling copies. No one would have bought the digital copy you stole, but no one would have bought the one you bought. But you have the game without paying for it. That's theft.
#88 - craigdavid (10/13/2013) [-]
but i would never have bought the game, i would have gone to my friends house who has already played the game and played it there. all it does is save me the effort of going down the street to play it for free
#4 - why the **** is the word embarassing censored on … 10/08/2013 on Awful 0
#2 - i think WW2 gave germany in general a concussion 10/08/2013 on Bier ist für trinken 0
#10 - im ugessing thats why the description exists 10/08/2013 on Batdredd 0

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)