x
Click to expand

cormy

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Youtube Channel: Cormy1Live
Date Signed Up:2/20/2013
Location:Montreal
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#1082
Comment Ranking:#6127
Highest Content Rank:#1085
Highest Comment Rank:#2085
Content Thumbs: 2429 total,  2639 ,  210
Comment Thumbs: 5029 total,  6377 ,  1348
Content Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 12% (12/100)
Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:2
Content Views:93941
Times Content Favorited:111 times
Total Comments Made:6721
FJ Points:6315
Favorite Tags: 4Chan (4) | AutismAnonymous (3) | youtube (3) | comments (2) | cormy (2)

latest user's comments

#105 - Less work for screws or welding?  [+] (8 new replies) 04/19/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
User avatar #106 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
id consider screws and partial-welding to be the same amount of work
User avatar #107 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
So then your argument is invalid and welding could be a fine alternative if it wasn't meant to come back apart?
User avatar #108 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
well until now we were assuming that the metals used in the gun were the same metal used in the screw. however, if we take into account that many guns have some form of titanium in them, then it becomes a completely different matter of how easy it is to smooth over. even if we look at a less-durable yet still common form of steel (4140), it's very difficult to smooth over- definitely a significant ordeal compared to just the one screw in that gif.
it may or may not be the same amount of work, but the difficulty rises one way or another.
User avatar #109 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Why would the screw be a lower grade/easier to the smooth over steel than the weld?
User avatar #110 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
simply because titanium screws aren't necessary to keep metals in place, which is the purpose of screws. granted, they do need to meet a certain level of durability, but they're not going to break or shatter unless they're specifically made of very poor material.
User avatar #111 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
And all welds have titanium in them...? Why?
User avatar #112 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
wait, what? i don't think i ever said that.
i said titanium was a commonly used material, and then i presented a less expensive steel substitute.
i was using titanium in my most recent comment to make a point that screws don't need to be, and often aren't (though i may be mistaken on this), as durable as the metals they're securing.
User avatar #113 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Well, I mean that the welding metals are stronger than the screws, therefore more difficult to smooth down, didn't really mean Titanium welds in particular.
#35 - How about yes, it's good for ya and it'll keep your mouth dry. 04/19/2015 on (untitled) 0
#102 - Okay but if you're just welding the spots that require screws.  [+] (10 new replies) 04/19/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
User avatar #104 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
that gets a both a bit more complicated and simplified. it would require a lot more attention to detail, since even one or two accidental gaps could compromise the design, but it's less work in quantity.
User avatar #105 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Less work for screws or welding?
User avatar #106 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
id consider screws and partial-welding to be the same amount of work
User avatar #107 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
So then your argument is invalid and welding could be a fine alternative if it wasn't meant to come back apart?
User avatar #108 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
well until now we were assuming that the metals used in the gun were the same metal used in the screw. however, if we take into account that many guns have some form of titanium in them, then it becomes a completely different matter of how easy it is to smooth over. even if we look at a less-durable yet still common form of steel (4140), it's very difficult to smooth over- definitely a significant ordeal compared to just the one screw in that gif.
it may or may not be the same amount of work, but the difficulty rises one way or another.
User avatar #109 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Why would the screw be a lower grade/easier to the smooth over steel than the weld?
User avatar #110 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
simply because titanium screws aren't necessary to keep metals in place, which is the purpose of screws. granted, they do need to meet a certain level of durability, but they're not going to break or shatter unless they're specifically made of very poor material.
User avatar #111 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
And all welds have titanium in them...? Why?
User avatar #112 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
wait, what? i don't think i ever said that.
i said titanium was a commonly used material, and then i presented a less expensive steel substitute.
i was using titanium in my most recent comment to make a point that screws don't need to be, and often aren't (though i may be mistaken on this), as durable as the metals they're securing.
User avatar #113 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Well, I mean that the welding metals are stronger than the screws, therefore more difficult to smooth down, didn't really mean Titanium welds in particular.
#104 - Nothing intelligent I can assure you. It's my fault for be… 04/19/2015 on potion of cure disease +2
#103 - Using my previous process would yiiiiiield... AAXXXXXXXXX=… 04/19/2015 on potion of cure disease 0
#99 - Didn't you say you didn't want a case where A=B? I don't know …  [+] (1 new reply) 04/19/2015 on potion of cure disease -1
#106 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
Yeah it does, but you'd count that combination twice by using this reasoning and including the case where A=B, because you'd count AAB and ABB (which, if A=B, are the same).

Granted, with trips this difficulty is barely noticeable, but for more numbers it would get complicated doing it that way (and you'd have to consider increasingly more different cases, too long!). But anyways the formula that "itsthethai" proposed it much better, because its correct for any amount of digits.
#132 - Meh, I kind of assumed it was the name of this particular bird. 04/19/2015 on birds are dicks 0
#71 - Forget everything I said. FORGET IT. 04/19/2015 on potion of cure disease +1
#69 - ... I apologize. I derped somewhere really really hard. Wa…  [+] (9 new replies) 04/19/2015 on potion of cure disease -1
#87 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I meant your previous math, that one is more sensible albeit incorrect as well.
#86 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
That's alright, your math over there was pretty bad though xD. If you roll 3 numbers, you can have two different types of dubs, AAB or ABB, and for each letter you have 10 different possibilities, but we don't want A=B (in that case we would be counting some dubs twice) so in reality we have 10 possibilities for choosing one, and 9 for choosing the other one, and so we have a total 2*10*9 = 180 possibilities, which is an 18% chance of rolling dubs. This is almost double than rolling regular dubs.

I didn't want to bother calculating it because my combinatorics are rusty, so I just coded a quick program to test all different numbers from 00000 to 99999 for adjacent equal numbers ("dubs"), and I got 34390, which means there's a 34.39% chance of getting dubs when rolling 5 numbers, which is over a third, so yeah pretty easy. This does include trips, quads and quints too.
#89 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I forgot to add trips, which account for 10 possibilities, so the total for dubs with 3 numbers is 190 -> 19% chance.
User avatar #99 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Didn't you say you didn't want a case where A=B? I don't know why you didn't but doesn't that equal trips if you have ABB and A=B?
#106 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
Yeah it does, but you'd count that combination twice by using this reasoning and including the case where A=B, because you'd count AAB and ABB (which, if A=B, are the same).

Granted, with trips this difficulty is barely noticeable, but for more numbers it would get complicated doing it that way (and you'd have to consider increasingly more different cases, too long!). But anyways the formula that "itsthethai" proposed it much better, because its correct for any amount of digits.
#78 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
#91 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I'm actually rather surprised that math actually worked, but the result is correct, I just ran an exhaustive test with all numbers and I got exactly 34390 "dubs" numbers, so 34.39% chance indeed.

I'm glad to see there was such an elegant solution, easily generalizable.
#75 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
User avatar #103 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Using my previous process would yiiiiiield...
AAXXXXXXXXX=1 000 000 000 instances of dubs
10 possible dub positions and 10 possible variations of dub so 100 Bil possible dubs without accounting for multiple instances of the same dubs.
So 100 Bil / 100 Bil Yeah, 100% lulz
It is certainly flawed thanks to the re-occuring dubs not being removed. I could "manually" do those without probability as well if we're just looking for instances of either single dub occurences or even including trips... quads... etc.
But that'd be tiresome
#24 - Not all songs follow standard 12 key scales but yeah. 04/19/2015 on That's daft +1
#29 - Swallow more often and breathe through your mouth more.  [+] (2 new replies) 04/19/2015 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #32 - severepwner (04/19/2015) [-]
I swallow as often as an involuntary action allows. But I tend to slow down on that once I start talking, example when I'm telling a long story, giving it a chance to accumulate.

Be a mouth breather? Are you serious? How about no.
User avatar #35 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
How about yes, it's good for ya and it'll keep your mouth dry.
#66 - Comment deleted  [+] (11 new replies) 04/19/2015 on potion of cure disease -1
User avatar #67 - synthane (04/19/2015) [-]
I have no idea what kind of math you think you are doing, but it is definitely wrong. When you roll two numbers, you only have those two. Rolling five numbers gives you far more of a chance to get two numbers adjacent to each other to be the same.

Look at it this way. The first two numbers in a five number set on their own have the same chance as if you only rolled two numbers, let alone the possibility of dubs in any of the rest of the five.
User avatar #69 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
... I apologize. I derped somewhere really really hard.
Wait a sec, lemme just... Go home and rethink my life.
I think it's because I was doing 5 rolls of 1/10 instead of 1 roll of 1/100 000
Depends on how the roll mechanic works.

So let's see here... 00XXX can occur 1000 times...
1000*10*4 = 40000 dubs
Seem more accurate? That should include occurrences of quads 'n' quints aswell. So 40% chance?
#87 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I meant your previous math, that one is more sensible albeit incorrect as well.
#86 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
That's alright, your math over there was pretty bad though xD. If you roll 3 numbers, you can have two different types of dubs, AAB or ABB, and for each letter you have 10 different possibilities, but we don't want A=B (in that case we would be counting some dubs twice) so in reality we have 10 possibilities for choosing one, and 9 for choosing the other one, and so we have a total 2*10*9 = 180 possibilities, which is an 18% chance of rolling dubs. This is almost double than rolling regular dubs.

I didn't want to bother calculating it because my combinatorics are rusty, so I just coded a quick program to test all different numbers from 00000 to 99999 for adjacent equal numbers ("dubs"), and I got 34390, which means there's a 34.39% chance of getting dubs when rolling 5 numbers, which is over a third, so yeah pretty easy. This does include trips, quads and quints too.
#89 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I forgot to add trips, which account for 10 possibilities, so the total for dubs with 3 numbers is 190 -> 19% chance.
User avatar #99 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Didn't you say you didn't want a case where A=B? I don't know why you didn't but doesn't that equal trips if you have ABB and A=B?
#106 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
Yeah it does, but you'd count that combination twice by using this reasoning and including the case where A=B, because you'd count AAB and ABB (which, if A=B, are the same).

Granted, with trips this difficulty is barely noticeable, but for more numbers it would get complicated doing it that way (and you'd have to consider increasingly more different cases, too long!). But anyways the formula that "itsthethai" proposed it much better, because its correct for any amount of digits.
#78 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
#91 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I'm actually rather surprised that math actually worked, but the result is correct, I just ran an exhaustive test with all numbers and I got exactly 34390 "dubs" numbers, so 34.39% chance indeed.

I'm glad to see there was such an elegant solution, easily generalizable.
#75 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
User avatar #103 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Using my previous process would yiiiiiield...
AAXXXXXXXXX=1 000 000 000 instances of dubs
10 possible dub positions and 10 possible variations of dub so 100 Bil possible dubs without accounting for multiple instances of the same dubs.
So 100 Bil / 100 Bil Yeah, 100% lulz
It is certainly flawed thanks to the re-occuring dubs not being removed. I could "manually" do those without probability as well if we're just looking for instances of either single dub occurences or even including trips... quads... etc.
But that'd be tiresome
#65 - Comment deleted  [+] (15 new replies) 04/18/2015 on potion of cure disease -3
#85 - eddymatagallos has deleted their comment.
#70 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
User avatar #71 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Forget everything I said.
FORGET IT.
#66 - cormy has deleted their comment.
User avatar #67 - synthane (04/19/2015) [-]
I have no idea what kind of math you think you are doing, but it is definitely wrong. When you roll two numbers, you only have those two. Rolling five numbers gives you far more of a chance to get two numbers adjacent to each other to be the same.

Look at it this way. The first two numbers in a five number set on their own have the same chance as if you only rolled two numbers, let alone the possibility of dubs in any of the rest of the five.
User avatar #69 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
... I apologize. I derped somewhere really really hard.
Wait a sec, lemme just... Go home and rethink my life.
I think it's because I was doing 5 rolls of 1/10 instead of 1 roll of 1/100 000
Depends on how the roll mechanic works.

So let's see here... 00XXX can occur 1000 times...
1000*10*4 = 40000 dubs
Seem more accurate? That should include occurrences of quads 'n' quints aswell. So 40% chance?
#87 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I meant your previous math, that one is more sensible albeit incorrect as well.
#86 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
That's alright, your math over there was pretty bad though xD. If you roll 3 numbers, you can have two different types of dubs, AAB or ABB, and for each letter you have 10 different possibilities, but we don't want A=B (in that case we would be counting some dubs twice) so in reality we have 10 possibilities for choosing one, and 9 for choosing the other one, and so we have a total 2*10*9 = 180 possibilities, which is an 18% chance of rolling dubs. This is almost double than rolling regular dubs.

I didn't want to bother calculating it because my combinatorics are rusty, so I just coded a quick program to test all different numbers from 00000 to 99999 for adjacent equal numbers ("dubs"), and I got 34390, which means there's a 34.39% chance of getting dubs when rolling 5 numbers, which is over a third, so yeah pretty easy. This does include trips, quads and quints too.
#89 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I forgot to add trips, which account for 10 possibilities, so the total for dubs with 3 numbers is 190 -> 19% chance.
User avatar #99 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Didn't you say you didn't want a case where A=B? I don't know why you didn't but doesn't that equal trips if you have ABB and A=B?
#106 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
Yeah it does, but you'd count that combination twice by using this reasoning and including the case where A=B, because you'd count AAB and ABB (which, if A=B, are the same).

Granted, with trips this difficulty is barely noticeable, but for more numbers it would get complicated doing it that way (and you'd have to consider increasingly more different cases, too long!). But anyways the formula that "itsthethai" proposed it much better, because its correct for any amount of digits.
#78 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
#91 - eddymatagallos (04/19/2015) [-]
I'm actually rather surprised that math actually worked, but the result is correct, I just ran an exhaustive test with all numbers and I got exactly 34390 "dubs" numbers, so 34.39% chance indeed.

I'm glad to see there was such an elegant solution, easily generalizable.
#75 - itsthethai has deleted their comment.
User avatar #103 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Using my previous process would yiiiiiield...
AAXXXXXXXXX=1 000 000 000 instances of dubs
10 possible dub positions and 10 possible variations of dub so 100 Bil possible dubs without accounting for multiple instances of the same dubs.
So 100 Bil / 100 Bil Yeah, 100% lulz
It is certainly flawed thanks to the re-occuring dubs not being removed. I could "manually" do those without probability as well if we're just looking for instances of either single dub occurences or even including trips... quads... etc.
But that'd be tiresome
#101 - Sauce?  [+] (2 new replies) 04/18/2015 on birds are dicks 0
#127 - commencingfailure (04/19/2015) [-]
"Farthing woods stole my innocence"
"Farthing woods"
"Idiot"
User avatar #132 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Meh, I kind of assumed it was the name of this particular bird.
#100 - Welcome back anon, I really missed it when all anons were assh… 04/18/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
#99 - Why?  [+] (12 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
User avatar #101 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
what do you mean why? it's much more to smooth out because you're welding together all of the edges together, as opposed to just a few screws.
User avatar #102 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Okay but if you're just welding the spots that require screws.
User avatar #104 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
that gets a both a bit more complicated and simplified. it would require a lot more attention to detail, since even one or two accidental gaps could compromise the design, but it's less work in quantity.
User avatar #105 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Less work for screws or welding?
User avatar #106 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
id consider screws and partial-welding to be the same amount of work
User avatar #107 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
So then your argument is invalid and welding could be a fine alternative if it wasn't meant to come back apart?
User avatar #108 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
well until now we were assuming that the metals used in the gun were the same metal used in the screw. however, if we take into account that many guns have some form of titanium in them, then it becomes a completely different matter of how easy it is to smooth over. even if we look at a less-durable yet still common form of steel (4140), it's very difficult to smooth over- definitely a significant ordeal compared to just the one screw in that gif.
it may or may not be the same amount of work, but the difficulty rises one way or another.
User avatar #109 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Why would the screw be a lower grade/easier to the smooth over steel than the weld?
User avatar #110 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
simply because titanium screws aren't necessary to keep metals in place, which is the purpose of screws. granted, they do need to meet a certain level of durability, but they're not going to break or shatter unless they're specifically made of very poor material.
User avatar #111 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
And all welds have titanium in them...? Why?
User avatar #112 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
wait, what? i don't think i ever said that.
i said titanium was a commonly used material, and then i presented a less expensive steel substitute.
i was using titanium in my most recent comment to make a point that screws don't need to be, and often aren't (though i may be mistaken on this), as durable as the metals they're securing.
User avatar #113 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Well, I mean that the welding metals are stronger than the screws, therefore more difficult to smooth down, didn't really mean Titanium welds in particular.
#83 - Really depends on the metal. I guarantee you that you cannot m… 04/18/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
#82 - What significant trace? Can't you grind and smooth it down in …  [+] (14 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
User avatar #84 - honzo (04/18/2015) [-]
kinda. if you tried to do that, the only problem with it is that there's a shit ton more of it to do.
User avatar #99 - cormy (04/18/2015) [-]
Why?
User avatar #101 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
what do you mean why? it's much more to smooth out because you're welding together all of the edges together, as opposed to just a few screws.
User avatar #102 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Okay but if you're just welding the spots that require screws.
User avatar #104 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
that gets a both a bit more complicated and simplified. it would require a lot more attention to detail, since even one or two accidental gaps could compromise the design, but it's less work in quantity.
User avatar #105 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Less work for screws or welding?
User avatar #106 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
id consider screws and partial-welding to be the same amount of work
User avatar #107 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
So then your argument is invalid and welding could be a fine alternative if it wasn't meant to come back apart?
User avatar #108 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
well until now we were assuming that the metals used in the gun were the same metal used in the screw. however, if we take into account that many guns have some form of titanium in them, then it becomes a completely different matter of how easy it is to smooth over. even if we look at a less-durable yet still common form of steel (4140), it's very difficult to smooth over- definitely a significant ordeal compared to just the one screw in that gif.
it may or may not be the same amount of work, but the difficulty rises one way or another.
User avatar #109 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Why would the screw be a lower grade/easier to the smooth over steel than the weld?
User avatar #110 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
simply because titanium screws aren't necessary to keep metals in place, which is the purpose of screws. granted, they do need to meet a certain level of durability, but they're not going to break or shatter unless they're specifically made of very poor material.
User avatar #111 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
And all welds have titanium in them...? Why?
User avatar #112 - honzo (04/19/2015) [-]
wait, what? i don't think i ever said that.
i said titanium was a commonly used material, and then i presented a less expensive steel substitute.
i was using titanium in my most recent comment to make a point that screws don't need to be, and often aren't (though i may be mistaken on this), as durable as the metals they're securing.
User avatar #113 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Well, I mean that the welding metals are stronger than the screws, therefore more difficult to smooth down, didn't really mean Titanium welds in particular.
#81 - >You can even have alloys made form a metal/non-metal too b…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... +2
User avatar #86 - penileburglar (04/18/2015) [-]
Man, it doesn't seem like anyone can actually get it all right at once.

I'm afraid to even offer my two cents because I'm sure I'll fuck up at least one detail too.
#94 - Ken M (04/18/2015) [-]
It's because we're all failures in life.
User avatar #100 - cormy (04/18/2015) [-]
Welcome back anon, I really missed it when all anons were assholes <3
Bring back a legit reason to hate anons please. PLEASE.
Those were the glory days, those were the days when I... Was an anon.
#80 - It's possible that with the head being shaved down, it's weake…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/18/2015 on Flushing a screw with the... 0
User avatar #87 - tenorkitsune (04/18/2015) [-]
Also true. It's really a 50-50 sort of thing, but if it's never going to need to be opened again anyways, then i think it looks pretty awesome.
#224 - I'm afraid I have no idea what you just said dear Anon. If…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Easy 0
#228 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
I don't even have a suitable facepalm reaction image or gif for you.

But good on you. Got me to reply, again.
User avatar #229 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Okay, so I take it you're not going to reword any of what you said so that I might understand you?
#230 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
Alright. Figured you were just trolling.

The principle is the same, man. If you take a normal needle and make it 40 times bigger in all aspects - getting the thread through the needle would pose no difficulty at all.

In the .gif she turns into a bat which is significantly smaller than her human form, meaning that that in essence, the needle "grew" from her perspective, or rather, everything did. If you take a sugar cube, it will be damn small for you, put for an ant it would be like a huge boulder.

The eyes will not remember and see the object as if you were still the same size, it will take it in as the size you are (or rather, as the object is to you). Therefore it made it easier to get the thread through the needle after she turned into a bat.
User avatar #232 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
No, that's not how eyes work as I said.
In order to see the same as the bat, all you have to do is bring the needle and thread closer to you, you get the same effect, that's the only perspective going on here, the object is held closer to the bat.
The eyes have NO idea what size you are and don't care at all, the magnification of an eye is all that matters. You could have a much much small object and hold it afar while having eagle eyes and be able to see it much much better regardless of the fact that they're much smaller than we are.
The size of your body has nothing to do with your vision. Yes, the needle is smaller compared to your body, but compared to your vision and the bat's it is the same. It occupies the same amount of visual space at the same distance if we assume the bat has eyes similar to ours, which is of course wrong, bats have shit eyes.
#233 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
Holy shit you're fucking stupid.
User avatar #235 - cormy (04/20/2015) [-]
Please point out all the things that make me appear stupid.
#137 - no, that's not how eyes work.  [+] (10 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Easy +1
#159 - Ken M (04/18/2015) [-]
No, no. You are right. Like, for example. If you took a needle and made it 40 times bigger in all aspects - it certainly would not make it easier to put a thread through the eye of the needle.

No, no. Cause that's not how eyes work.
User avatar #224 - cormy (04/18/2015) [-]
I'm afraid I have no idea what you just said dear Anon.
If you had a needle and made it bigger, it would be easier to put the thread through it since the thread would still be just as large.
In the case where they are both enlarged, yes, at which point you're ALMOST back to the same case as the original, although scaling isn't perfect in real world scenarios and your eyes will be able to discern the hole much easier than in the scaled down version since they aren't improved through the bat transformation.
#228 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
I don't even have a suitable facepalm reaction image or gif for you.

But good on you. Got me to reply, again.
User avatar #229 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
Okay, so I take it you're not going to reword any of what you said so that I might understand you?
#230 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
Alright. Figured you were just trolling.

The principle is the same, man. If you take a normal needle and make it 40 times bigger in all aspects - getting the thread through the needle would pose no difficulty at all.

In the .gif she turns into a bat which is significantly smaller than her human form, meaning that that in essence, the needle "grew" from her perspective, or rather, everything did. If you take a sugar cube, it will be damn small for you, put for an ant it would be like a huge boulder.

The eyes will not remember and see the object as if you were still the same size, it will take it in as the size you are (or rather, as the object is to you). Therefore it made it easier to get the thread through the needle after she turned into a bat.
User avatar #232 - cormy (04/19/2015) [-]
No, that's not how eyes work as I said.
In order to see the same as the bat, all you have to do is bring the needle and thread closer to you, you get the same effect, that's the only perspective going on here, the object is held closer to the bat.
The eyes have NO idea what size you are and don't care at all, the magnification of an eye is all that matters. You could have a much much small object and hold it afar while having eagle eyes and be able to see it much much better regardless of the fact that they're much smaller than we are.
The size of your body has nothing to do with your vision. Yes, the needle is smaller compared to your body, but compared to your vision and the bat's it is the same. It occupies the same amount of visual space at the same distance if we assume the bat has eyes similar to ours, which is of course wrong, bats have shit eyes.
#233 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
Holy shit you're fucking stupid.
User avatar #235 - cormy (04/20/2015) [-]
Please point out all the things that make me appear stupid.
#221 - xheanort (04/18/2015) [-]
#231 - Ken M (04/19/2015) [-]
#101 - Jesus christ I'm just having an argument here lol I'm not angr…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Tigers 0
User avatar #102 - AcidFlux (04/19/2015) [-]
tl;dr
#103 - cormy (04/20/2015) [-]
Now you've got your big boy pants on!
User avatar #104 - AcidFlux (04/20/2015) [-]
And it looks like you've finally gotten over a simple joke. Welcome to FunnyJunk. Enjoy your stay.
User avatar #105 - cormy (04/20/2015) [-]
Not in the slightest, that was sarcasm but the reaction picture is very much relevant. I'm disappointed in you.
It was never about the "joke", it was about a semantic debate, and I was fine with that.
It looks like you've finally gotten over your "ultimate knowledge bringer cure" or perhaps you've just given up because your knowledge isn't good enough to convince anyone of your bull shit views.
User avatar #107 - AcidFlux (04/29/2015) [-]
Ya know, re-reading this last bit, it's clear that you're saying that you're not over the joke, in the slightest. And that made me giggle.

You made a grown man giggle. Conflagrations.
#106 - AcidFlux (04/20/2015) [-]
#87 - lazy/ **** translation 04/18/2015 on 2lwd4mE 0
#71 - Below under what order? You mean >> #54 ?  [+] (2 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Follow your dreams 0
User avatar #83 - theelyzian (04/18/2015) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #96 - Toshiro (04/18/2015) [-]
How does one manage to reply to the wrong comment lol

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1400
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#155 to #154 - cormy (19 hours ago) [-]
I'm afraid I don't just accept friend requests from anyone.
I have standards you see.
User avatar #130 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
Uh...
User avatar #131 to #130 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Dear lord that was fast.
Uhm ya.
We're unacquainted but like... I know your name, which means that at some point I probably enjoyed your comments so I'd like to be able to stalk the **** out of your profile right about now.
kthxbai
User avatar #151 to #131 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
Tumblr drove me over the edge

Asami is a wonderful character dripping with personality but the show writers and tumblr see her as baggage and tits

awful writing.
User avatar #152 to #151 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Why the new reply stack again?
And what could have possibly drove you to write so much?! I mean... Giving Asami a proper background is one thing, but you're tackling a whole lot more than that! Seems like you've got yourself an enormous project going on.
User avatar #153 to #152 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
This will take months to finish since I'm redoing all 4 books

and Korra will know the fear of god.
User avatar #139 to #131 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
almost two years
User avatar #132 to #131 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
...

How about getting to know me and I'll base my assumptions off you.
User avatar #140 to #132 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Wha-?
Deleted to get rid of spoilers I take it?
Where can I find the whole story so far?
User avatar #141 to #140 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
What's the point?

You don't like LoK figure I just get rid of the pictures.
User avatar #142 to #141 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
But... Your writing =/= LoK writing/directing.
I can separate my thoughts on the show from my thoughts on your comic.
#143 to #142 - murrlogic has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #144 to #143 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Well **** .
What age are we talking here?
Like... How far before book 1?
#145 to #144 - murrlogic has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #146 to #145 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
So no main gallery link for the comic atm?
Are there other people working on it with you or do you have to do all the work yourself O.o?
User avatar #147 to #146 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
I ******* wish I had a crew to help me with this. I do the entire story by myself which is a pain in the ass to constantly re-edit

My friend does the artwork. that's about it.
User avatar #148 to #147 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
**** .
That.
**** .
Although I've been able to force myself to write stories for school, I've never liked doing it. It doesn't matter what pops into my head, actually writing is is just shiiiiiiiiit work that seems to do more harm than anything else! I have a friend of mine that runs a serious role-playing game-story thingy and he takes it very seriously and has been doing it for a while, no idea how he keeps it up.
Have you at least had a general idea/direction for the story from the start? 'cause I have a problem with that, I might come up with a good concept for a story but actually making a basic plotline for the whole thing is impossible!
User avatar #149 to #148 - murrlogic ONLINE (03/31/2015) [-]
Legend of Sato, legend of Beifong, Book 1, Book 2, Legend of Mako are all completed script wise

Getting to the red lotus chapters is gonna be long because I need to write prequels for all 4 of them THEN do book 3.
User avatar #150 to #149 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Script-wise?
So all the dialogue is already done but you're waiting on...? Comic pages?
Where did the idea for this come from? You just... Randomly... Decided to you wanted to write a prequel story for LoK? O.o
User avatar #133 to #132 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Damn.
Well... I mean... I did get to know you, back when I first came to remember this name.
But it's been a while.
I'm pretty liberal with my friendships since I usually don't remember people. If I do at all, it's usually a good sign.
But uhh... I can do chitchat here if you'd like. I'm not very good at it though.
You like arts?
#134 to #133 - murrlogic has deleted their comment [-]
#135 to #134 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
Oh noooooooonononono nothing of the sort.
I mean... I do draw, but not in a serious way and maybe only once a year
Could get drawings from when I was in elementary school for ya!
Nah, I just got sum stuff from the internet and uhh... I own 2 posters. I guess there's a couple of paintings around the house too, got a wolf one above my headboard.

You saying you drew that comic? Or is it a "reaction comic"?
#136 to #135 - murrlogic has deleted their comment [-]
#137 to #136 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
I have a serious lack of anything LoK related because I really didn't enjoy the series... Couldn't take any of it serious at all. I didn't end up watching most of the episodes. I started it, didn't like it, was forced to watch the entire first... 2? 3? seasons and then I was forced to watch the 2 finale episodes by my friend.
Code Geass is my thing mainly for large digital art collections aswell as some pony stuff.
User avatar #138 to #137 - cormy (03/31/2015) [-]
I did just find an older comment in my history pertaining to Felidae and some other nastier cartoons which featured you in the thread... And I also recognize the style use the comics you're posting right now, how long have you been doing that for?
User avatar #120 - cormy (11/10/2014) [-]
Anyone know the source for this?
funnyjunk.com/bronies/9777955#9777955
#93 to #92 - cormy (08/04/2014) [-]
Far more work went into stitching this together than I care to admit.
MS paint is a god.
#94 to #93 - cormy (08/05/2014) [-]
Not my work, hence how ugly it is.
#113 to #112 - cormy (09/30/2014) [-]
Server De-Syncs are fun
#82 - cormy (07/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#55 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
Yeah, definitely on the low for gifs. I might've had more on the laptop but that was stolen a few months ago.   
Are pics fine limb?
Yeah, definitely on the low for gifs. I might've had more on the laptop but that was stolen a few months ago.
Are pics fine limb?
#61 to #55 - limb (07/22/2014) [-]
I have this.
I have this.
#69 to #66 - limb (07/22/2014) [-]
That's about all I got thanks for the gifs a pictures.
That's about all I got thanks for the gifs a pictures.
#70 to #68 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
There are still more to come limb!
#71 to #70 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
Dunno what your interests are but I tend to like more vibrant pictures with cute faces and awesome hair.
#72 to #71 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
I also have a weakness for furs as I'm sure you've noticed lol
#73 to #72 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
I'm in my Geass folder atm.
I really really love Code Geass and its characters.
#74 to #73 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
I have posted all my geass folder before along with all the sources so if you'd like I can link you to that. It's on facebook, with sources in the descriptions.
#76 to #75 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
I'll PM you the link if you want it.
#79 to #78 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
Alright back to random anime chicks.
#81 to #80 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
#56 to #55 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
God damn short Tumblr gifs...
God damn short Tumblr gifs...
#59 to #58 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
I really have barely anything on this damn PC for gifs &gt;.&lt; Mostly just mlp-related stuff.
I really have barely anything on this damn PC for gifs >.< Mostly just mlp-related stuff.
#60 to #59 - cormy (07/22/2014) [-]
Really I just don't have much on here in general other than mlp pics &gt;.&lt; Ugh
Really I just don't have much on here in general other than mlp pics >.< Ugh
#52 - cormy (06/16/2014) [-]
Hurray! I now know where this... Thing... Is from.   
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5LAaac9ABo
Hurray! I now know where this... Thing... Is from.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5LAaac9ABo
#51 - cormy (05/29/2014) [-]
Wtf kgmonell, y u do dis?
User avatar #32 - shibe (12/20/2013) [-]
Not musical theory, just music genres and history of rock music and that such. Sorry I couldn't respond to you in the thread.
User avatar #33 to #32 - cormy (12/20/2013) [-]
How 'bout Electronic genres?
User avatar #34 to #33 - shibe (12/20/2013) [-]
Electronic music and it's sub genres is my favorite.

I'm more favorable to the IDM side instead of the EDM side. But both are still quite enjoyable.
User avatar #35 to #34 - cormy (12/20/2013) [-]
[white]I'm trying to think of how I want to formulate the question I want to ask lol...
How would you... Arrange the genres in relation to how the sound-relate to each other structurally?
Use this as base I guess: You need to login to view this link
User avatar #8 - cormy (06/04/2013) [-]
If anyone can help me find an absolutely ancient Tales of Symphonia parody series, you have all my love. It was a parody of the game, not the anime and it featured such stupidity as:
"Redbull gives you wings!"
"The chosen? The chosen. THE CHOSEN! THE CHOSEN!?! THE CHOSEN! The chosen of mana. The chosen."
"Woman, woman, woman, woman, woman!"
"Mythos wanted to **** Noishe."
#7 - cormy (05/15/2013) [-]
Source for this here gif: www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAsPeY8BsQU
Source for this here gif: www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAsPeY8BsQU
User avatar #1 - twi (04/14/2013) [-]
umm... hi?
#2 to #1 - cormy (04/14/2013) [-]
Oh most unholy 			****		 that was fast! O.o   
I wub you.   
I think that's about it! XD
Oh most unholy **** that was fast! O.o
I wub you.
I think that's about it! XD
User avatar #3 to #2 - twi (04/14/2013) [-]
oh my <3
 Friends (0)