Upload
Login or register
x

congorepublic

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/13/2015
Last Login:1/14/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4768
Comment Ranking:#6075
Highest Content Rank:#4746
Highest Comment Rank:#1336
Content Thumbs: 100 total,  152 ,  52
Comment Thumbs: 1678 total,  3039 ,  1361
Content Level Progress: 20% (1/5)
Level 5 Content: New Here → Level 6 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 18% (9/50)
Level 211 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:18399
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:782
FJ Points:1235

Text Posts

  • Views: 3365
    Thumbs Up 43 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +36
    Comments: 13
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 12/30/15
    fuckin' manlet lel fuckin' manlet lel
  • Views: 1593
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +6
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/14/15
    Time to go congo Time to go congo
  • Views: 1147
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +4
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/19/15
    Life Alert Life Alert
  • Views: 798
    Thumbs Up 2 Thumbs Down 2 Total: 0
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 10/23/15
    cunt destroyer inbound cunt destroyer inbound
  • Views: 315
    Thumbs Up 2 Thumbs Down 7 Total: -5
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/15/15
    (untitled) (untitled)
  • Views: 1632
    Thumbs Up 13 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +8
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 09/14/15
    Willy West Willy West
  • Views: 1284
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +5
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/11/15
    OY VEY OY VEY
  • Views: 1118
    Thumbs Up 4 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +2
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/14/15
    he went congo on our asses he went congo on our asses

HD Gifs / WebMs

latest user's comments

#56 - I felt so bad for clicking next because I felt like I blew up …  [+] (1 new reply) 20 hours ago on "I'm gonna be just like Dad" 0
User avatar
#62 - nyxeos (17 hours ago) [-]
All you had to do was scroll down, and there's a good chance you did that to comment. although you could have used the keyboard shortcut
#4 - I don't get it.  [+] (1 new reply) 20 hours ago on Polandball Puns 0
#5 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
That's the country, Ghana. He is very sick, but the doctor can not help him, so he will surely die. In other words, he's a goner.
'Ghana' is pronounced similar to 'goner'
"He is a goner" is used when describing someone who will soon die or already died.
#3 - Thank you for giving me the opportunity to see my wonderful co… 20 hours ago on Polandball Puns 0
#86 - Where is your proof that armies were being "Massed by Isr… 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape -1
#82 - That is true. Keep in mind that Israel did pre-emptive strikes…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape +1
#85 - anon (01/13/2016) [-]
They were preparing for war. Israel just fired the first shot. Besides what the fuck did they think israel was gonna do when they started massing their armies by israel's borders. Did they think they were going to surprise israel? "Oh these guys hate us but they would never attack us again!" said no one ever.
User avatar
#86 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Where is your proof that armies were being "Massed by Israel's borders"?
#81 - Exactly. 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape -1
#74 - Nowadays, numbers don't mean nearly as much as they used to. I… 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape -1
#71 - Not even true. Islamic Golden Age, buddy. 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape -1
#70 - Even still, the Americans and British were much more invested …  [+] (13 new replies) 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape +2
#72 - hillbillypowpow (01/13/2016) [-]
Just like you shouldn't be able to compare the strength of six countries and the one that's surrounded by them
#75 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
War isn't about numbers you cheese, it's about technogical advantage which thanks to America Israel has had since day one
#90 - blankityblankblank (01/13/2016) [-]
no, on day one they didn't have tanks, or planes, or artillery, but every nation around them did.
#102 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
Not true in the slightest, your own source says otherwise
#103 - blankityblankblank (01/13/2016) [-]
on day one, they didn't, as it had been purchased but not shipped over, as evident by the fact that they only began to ship in major arms when the British blockade ended.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War#First_phase:_15_May_.E2.80.93_11_June_1948
I know i posted the link to the second phase, but the war itself was one single war for everyone observing.
#106 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
A war that started in 48 after the Israelis had stockpiled since 46.
It's 4AM here and I've barely slept this so I could be missing the exact text you refer to but I can't see anywhere that says "they had no planes tanks or artillery to repel the attack"
User avatar
#81 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Exactly.
#77 - hillbillypowpow (01/13/2016) [-]
I'm not saying the Arabs should have won, I'm just saying the got fucked
User avatar
#82 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
That is true. Keep in mind that Israel did pre-emptive strikes before the war even began.

The entire Egyptian Airforce was on the ground and stationed there when the attacks began. Afterwards, only 4 or 5 aircraft remained.

In addition to that, Israel also did pre-emptive strikes in the Western Bank. It's not like the war was purely one-on-one, but it also wasn't face-to-face. Israel did the equivalent of a Pearl Harbor, multiplied by 10 and without the suicide bombing.
#85 - anon (01/13/2016) [-]
They were preparing for war. Israel just fired the first shot. Besides what the fuck did they think israel was gonna do when they started massing their armies by israel's borders. Did they think they were going to surprise israel? "Oh these guys hate us but they would never attack us again!" said no one ever.
User avatar
#86 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Where is your proof that armies were being "Massed by Israel's borders"?
#79 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
Yeah it happens. Sometimes things don't go the way they should, like Korea or Vietnam or the Battle of Britain.

Some times the little guy wins.
User avatar
#74 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Nowadays, numbers don't mean nearly as much as they used to. In modern warfare, all you need are effective air-strikes. That isn't to say that the Arabs never had any, but they definitely had far fewer than the Israelis.
#68 - The Arabs had the advantage up until American and British air …  [+] (18 new replies) 01/13/2016 on Eye-rape +2
#69 - hillbillypowpow (01/13/2016) [-]
The Arabs had the help of the soviet union though
#141 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
In fact from what I've just read the Soviets were appalled by the Arab invasion of 48
User avatar
#96 - runescapewasgood (01/13/2016) [-]
the arabs were fighting amongst each other in things like operation cyclone in afghanistan where there was a soviet-supporting party and a western-supporting party that eventually warred it out.

by the time they were done dealing with the issues of the cold war, their weaponry was outdated and there was an incredible amount of political disunity.

israel got direct western support. no wars amongst themselves - they were 1 unified (nonimperialized) force. rather, israel was the imperializing force that forced palestine into submission, essentially
#73 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
Not in the same way though
User avatar
#70 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Even still, the Americans and British were much more invested in Israel than the USSR was to the Arabs. You can't really compare the two.
#72 - hillbillypowpow (01/13/2016) [-]
Just like you shouldn't be able to compare the strength of six countries and the one that's surrounded by them
#75 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
War isn't about numbers you cheese, it's about technogical advantage which thanks to America Israel has had since day one
#90 - blankityblankblank (01/13/2016) [-]
no, on day one they didn't have tanks, or planes, or artillery, but every nation around them did.
#102 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
Not true in the slightest, your own source says otherwise
#103 - blankityblankblank (01/13/2016) [-]
on day one, they didn't, as it had been purchased but not shipped over, as evident by the fact that they only began to ship in major arms when the British blockade ended.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War#First_phase:_15_May_.E2.80.93_11_June_1948
I know i posted the link to the second phase, but the war itself was one single war for everyone observing.
#106 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
A war that started in 48 after the Israelis had stockpiled since 46.
It's 4AM here and I've barely slept this so I could be missing the exact text you refer to but I can't see anywhere that says "they had no planes tanks or artillery to repel the attack"
User avatar
#81 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Exactly.
#77 - hillbillypowpow (01/13/2016) [-]
I'm not saying the Arabs should have won, I'm just saying the got fucked
User avatar
#82 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
That is true. Keep in mind that Israel did pre-emptive strikes before the war even began.

The entire Egyptian Airforce was on the ground and stationed there when the attacks began. Afterwards, only 4 or 5 aircraft remained.

In addition to that, Israel also did pre-emptive strikes in the Western Bank. It's not like the war was purely one-on-one, but it also wasn't face-to-face. Israel did the equivalent of a Pearl Harbor, multiplied by 10 and without the suicide bombing.
#85 - anon (01/13/2016) [-]
They were preparing for war. Israel just fired the first shot. Besides what the fuck did they think israel was gonna do when they started massing their armies by israel's borders. Did they think they were going to surprise israel? "Oh these guys hate us but they would never attack us again!" said no one ever.
User avatar
#86 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Where is your proof that armies were being "Massed by Israel's borders"?
#79 - Jowi (01/13/2016) [-]
Yeah it happens. Sometimes things don't go the way they should, like Korea or Vietnam or the Battle of Britain.

Some times the little guy wins.
User avatar
#74 - congorepublic (01/13/2016) [-]
Nowadays, numbers don't mean nearly as much as they used to. In modern warfare, all you need are effective air-strikes. That isn't to say that the Arabs never had any, but they definitely had far fewer than the Israelis.

Comments(70):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
70 comments displayed.
User avatar #16 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [+] (2 replies)
stickied by congorepublic
Welcome to the Congo Republic. Enjoy your stay here/become a part of the Congo Army.

Together, we will congo a million asses.
User avatar #34 - iminschool (10/30/2015) [-]
Lol, Kibbleking.

I can't believe you are friends with this self proclaimed genius liberal.
User avatar #36 to #34 - congorepublic (10/30/2015) [-]
I don't think I'm a genius at all. You're just so far on the right, that any moderate views appear leftist.

The funny thing is that all you're good for is ad hominems. Nothing more than that imo.
User avatar #38 to #36 - iminschool (10/30/2015) [-]
Sorry, was I talking to you, nog?
User avatar #64 to #38 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
damn this guy is a cuck tho
User avatar #68 to #64 - iminschool (10/31/2015) [-]
The worst part is, I be he is white.
User avatar #69 to #68 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
I thought Marx was supposed to be dead.
User avatar #70 to #69 - iminschool (11/01/2015) [-]
lol
User avatar #40 to #38 - congorepublic (10/30/2015) [-]
This is a free country, commie.
User avatar #44 to #40 - kibbleking (10/30/2015) [-]
You can't call people communist and advocate for Social Democracy.
Lenin pls go
User avatar #46 to #44 - congorepublic (10/30/2015) [-]
You do realize we're already a social democracy? Herpa derp.
User avatar #47 to #46 - kibbleking (10/30/2015) [-]
Wrong. US isn't evn a true democracy. It's a federal republic.
User avatar #48 to #47 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
It is still social nonetheless.

Everything federally-sponsored is federal. If you're against socialism, don't use the emergency services, FAFSA, Medicaid/Medicare, etc.
User avatar #49 to #48 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
Wrong. The US doesn't shill out everything to its citizens like Socially Democratic countries do. Find me anything at all that says the US is Socially Democratic.
User avatar #50 to #49 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
Your definition of socialist isn't even correct.

Social means anything that is paid for by the government, via taxes, for the benefit of the people.

I just gave you multiple examples in which the U.S Gov't sponsors programs for that very reason.
User avatar #51 to #50 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
The US is neither a Democracy nor Socialist. And by the definition of 'Socialist,' everything must be owned by the state. You failed to provide anything except yourself that says the US is Socially Democratic.
User avatar #52 to #51 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
No. Socialism is a mix of communism and capitalism. That's what every major developed country on Earth is. There is no such thing as purely Social/purely Capitalist, because both systems fail miserably.

The U.S may not be "democratic" per se, but it is socialist in the same way it is capitalist.
User avatar #53 to #52 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
Wrong again. Unless you can find something to support your claims, I can claim that capitalism is a mix of Fascism and Socialism, which is more true since capitalism is more centrist than either. I can also claim that because of the Judicial System and laws and policemen, that the US is Fascist. Why can I claim that? Because a few tenets make it so. Don't mind the fact that it's obviously not fascist. I mean, if a few tenets that are associated with socialism can make a purely capitalist Federal Republic with the largest economy in the world Socially Democratic, then hey, why not?
User avatar #54 to #53 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
... what the **** are you rambling on about.

It's a social republic. End of story.
User avatar #55 to #54 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
Federal Republic*
User avatar #56 to #55 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
If that were the case, then you wouldn't have gov't sponored programs. Your perception is that it's either 100% Marxist or it isn't a socialist.

You do know that there are tiers of socialism, just as there are tiers of capitalism.
User avatar #57 to #56 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
But it is a Federal Republic. That's the government system. That's what the US government says it is, and that's what other governments say it is. It's indisputable. Unless you're some kind of conspiracy theorist.
User avatar #67 to #57 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
Government sponsored prograns are essential. If you disagree, go to Somalia.
User avatar #58 to #57 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
Thats a political system, not economic. We are talking about economics
User avatar #59 to #58 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
"If that were the case we wouldn't have gov't sponsored programs"
Oh I must have misread when you clearly thought that you couldn't have both. What changed your mind? Is it because you couldn't argue it anymore otherwise?
User avatar #65 to #59 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
Exactly. Those are SOCIAL programs. Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan had socialist principles. Socialism is not directly intertwined with political systems. Even saudi arabia has social constructs, and its a ******* theocratic autocracy.
My point is that socialism is essential. Your definition of socialism is wrong. It isnt "shilling out everything to everyone." It's simply governments sponsoring programs via taxes.

Some states are more/less social than others. I prefer Norway's tier of socialism.
User avatar #66 to #65 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
That makes you a social democrat. You said the US was Socially Democratic, and that's simply untrue both socially and economically. Now you're claiming that your point is that socialism is essential? It's not. Your point was the US was Socially Democratic. Stop flip flopping around. Just because you can't argue a point further doesn't mean you need to keep arguing anyway. **** off with this ******** .
User avatar #62 to #59 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
I may have ****** up, but my ORIGINAL point that the US is a socialist nation still stands.
User avatar #63 to #62 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
We have gov't sponsered programs, but so did Nazi Germany. So did Fascist Italy. So did Imperialistic Japan. What's your point? You can have gov't programs and not be socialist, just the same you can have a judicial system and a police force without being fascist.
User avatar #60 to #59 - congorepublic (10/31/2015) [-]
You can be politically federal AND government programs. Whats your point?
User avatar #61 to #60 - kibbleking (10/31/2015) [-]
Now you say that, but >>56 says otherwise. Don't hide the fact you ****** up.
User avatar #41 to #40 - iminschool (10/30/2015) [-]
>congo
>free

I'm starting to think you are just a **** poster now
User avatar #35 to #34 - kibbleking (10/30/2015) [-]
I'm a professional ********** , I know what I'm doing. Also I had a huge pissing contest with him a few months ago about Social Democracy.
User avatar #37 to #35 - iminschool (10/30/2015) [-]
Well, this is david and I disprove. He's been trying to convince me that I am retarded for the past 20 minutes. It's funny but kind of cringy at the same time.
User avatar #39 to #37 - kibbleking (10/30/2015) [-]
This is NOT David. David has a different alt account. Also David wouldn't support Bernie Sanders.
#42 to #39 - iminschool (10/30/2015) [-]
remember all those times I asked for your help? Remeber all of those banned accounts I have?

>Supporting Bernie

u wot now?
User avatar #43 to #42 - kibbleking (10/30/2015) [-]
Oh I thought you were talking about congorepublic being david.
lol hi david
User avatar #45 to #43 - iminschool (10/30/2015) [-]
lol, congorepublic supports bernie?

I was starting to think he was a unskilled NEET who got high all day and wants free **** for not doing ****

It makes sense now

User avatar #31 - friedgreenpomatoes (09/20/2015) [-]
imma belgium your ass
User avatar #33 to #32 - friedgreenpomatoes (10/09/2015) [-]
isn't he great folks?

let's give him a

hand
User avatar #30 - kibbleking (09/19/2015) [-]
holy **** dood you're great
User avatar #26 - fjtv (09/16/2015) [-]
Hello there, I'm FJTV and I'll be doing a FunnyJunk weekly news thing. I'd like to interview you about *cough* "going congo on admins ass". It's for the celebrity part of the news. If you'd be so kind to answer them in a voice recording.

Are you going to use lube or go in dry?

Saying "no homo" is, well, a part of tradition. Will you smooch admin on the cheeks and claim "no homo" too?

How long will it last?

Are you going to call admin afterwards, or is it just a one-nigther?

Will you scream profanities against recent updates while having a sexual intercourse with the Leader?

Are you afraid that you'll catch North Korean AIDS?

And one last. Do you think that Admin will have a tight butthole?
User avatar #28 to #26 - congorepublic (09/16/2015) [-]
1) Dry, just how admin likes it.

2) Yes, but in my congo tradition, this only works if the balls don't touch.

3) If I'm lucky, about 35 seconds. You see, congoing is a very complicated art. However, since Im a master with over 300 confirmed congos, it shouldn't be so long.

4) It's a one-night congo.

5) Yes. Unlubed.

6) No. I already have AIDS.

7) He's very muscular, so I presume that it will be a very tight hole. Luckily, I'm a congo master.
User avatar #29 to #28 - fjtv (09/16/2015) [-]
Thank you, I'll notify you when the video's out
User avatar #25 - DeathclawRulez (09/15/2015) [-]
I like this guy
User avatar #24 - wethepixelisgod (09/14/2015) [-]
nice
#22 - guanyu ONLINE (09/14/2015) [-]
0/10
no custom reaction image
User avatar #23 to #22 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
I love you.
User avatar #18 - obviousxplains (09/14/2015) [-]
hey bro!

I see youre a new theme account! cant wait until youre gone in 2 weeks and no one ever remembers you!
User avatar #19 to #18 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
A themed account going after a themed account.

You wanna get congo'd buddy?
User avatar #20 to #19 - obviousxplains (09/14/2015) [-]
im the most successful theme account on this site bitch ill take you come and have a go if you think your hard enough cracker ass bitch
User avatar #21 to #20 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
You don't know what you're getting yourself into. The congo republic army is growing rapidly. I am here to stay, good sir.

Your ass WILL get congo'd/
#11 - kibbleking (09/14/2015) [-]
Rhodesia best African nation
User avatar #12 to #11 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
This is a declaration of war. The congo people will prevail, you cunt.
#10 - tevenz (09/14/2015) [-]
Did somebody say Conga?
User avatar #13 to #10 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
I will go congo on your ass you cunt
User avatar #9 - shadowtails (09/14/2015) [-]
Thanks for coming to FJ! I swear I'm not a bot, just a mod wanting to make you feel at home. I hope you're enjoying the site. There's lots you can do. Post content, comments, make friends, post on boards, party with admin, play games, the list goes on.

Stick around, and have fun with us. If you have any questions at all, just ask. or go to askamod
User avatar #14 to #9 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
imma go congo on your ass first, cunt
User avatar #8 - jamesten (09/14/2015) [-]
so does congo mean to rape?
User avatar #15 to #8 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
It can mean anything you want it to be. I prefer saying congo instead of ******* .

I.e "imma go congo on your ass" instead of "imma go ******* on your ass"

User avatar #5 - deadmilk (09/14/2015) [-]
i bet you cant even congo 1 ass,fggt
User avatar #6 to #5 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
that's not what ur mother said, cunt
#7 to #6 - deadmilk (09/14/2015) [-]
my momma says a lot of ****
User avatar #1 - friedgreenpomatoes (09/14/2015) [-]
congo a ****
User avatar #2 to #1 - congorepublic (09/14/2015) [-]
I will ******* go congo on your ass you cunt.
User avatar #3 to #2 - friedgreenpomatoes (09/14/2015) [-]
then do it

cunt
 Friends (0)