Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

clechyl

Rank #298 on Comments
clechyl Avatar Level 329 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Offline
Send mail to clechyl Block clechyl Invite clechyl to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/id/kartoffeltoday
Consoles Owned: PlayStation, Nintendo 64, Nintendo GameCube, PC, Playstation 2,
X-box Gamertag: 5up3r5n1p3rqW1kSq0p3Pr0
Interests: games, games, games, internet, internet, internet, internet, internet, games
Date Signed Up:3/15/2011
Last Login:12/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3868
Comment Ranking:#298
Highest Content Rank:#1010
Highest Comment Rank:#135
Content Thumbs: 4188 total,  4885 ,  697
Comment Thumbs: 33663 total,  37772 ,  4109
Content Level Progress: 96% (96/100)
Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 133 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 61% (610/1000)
Level 329 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 330 Comments: Practically Famous
Subscribers:2
Content Views:274410
Times Content Favorited:505 times
Total Comments Made:6801
FJ Points:33141
Favorite Tags: 4Chan (3) | Kid (3) | Cars (2) | crashes (2) | funny (2) | game (2) | Mad (2) | the (2) | Train (2) | War (2) | your (2)
dllllllllllllll

latest user's comments

#190 - Dude, scroll down. I'm not gonna type out everything again jus… 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -1
#36 - What I meant was the death statistics and conditions were exag…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/27/2014 on context -4
#38 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
A gas chamber would work just fine with wooden doors you git. They didn't always use the same types of gas, and big surprise - wood can form an air-tight seal. Ever head of stuffing a towel under a doorway during a fire or gas leak? ffs.

And again, a single event where they couldn't find the remains of people does not discredit the entirety of the event. There are plenty of locations where they FOUND corpses, have images of people being executed. Detailed re-tellings by people who witnessed these things happen. Yes, you might be correct that the numbers aren't accurate. Who cares? There was a coordinated effort to systematically murder people based on their heritage. Auschwitz and many other camps like it did exist, and the records we have from there are excessive and detailed.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say beyond "There might have been fewer deaths than we thought." Yeah, okay, cool. Mildly interesting on an academic level. that does not excuse the fact that it happened. "less people were brutally murdered by the nazi regime, so the nazi regime couldn't have been so bad."
User avatar #39 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Of course there's no question such an event did occur, but it wasn't the only aspect of nazi germany and therefore nazi germany wasn't completely bad (refer to #16, germany wanted to end the war, the nazi party ended unemployment and poverty etc.)
#40 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
You are correct. No one is ever black and white evil/good.

With that in mind, the good they did in no way excuses the evil, just like the US was wrong for imprisoning Japanese citizens during the war with japan and then not returning their property afterwards.
#32 - Did you listen to what I said, or even look at the links i provided?  [+] (5 new replies) 09/27/2014 on context -4
#33 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
Yup. Not sure what you're implying I missed. A single location where they had simple technology for the gas chambers and they didn't find corpses strewn about doesn't mean the events that did occur weren't atrocious.
User avatar #36 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
What I meant was the death statistics and conditions were exaggerated. How would a gas chamber work with wooden doors? Why weren't there any bodies or ash found were there should have been? Ask yourself these questions and reply again.
#38 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
A gas chamber would work just fine with wooden doors you git. They didn't always use the same types of gas, and big surprise - wood can form an air-tight seal. Ever head of stuffing a towel under a doorway during a fire or gas leak? ffs.

And again, a single event where they couldn't find the remains of people does not discredit the entirety of the event. There are plenty of locations where they FOUND corpses, have images of people being executed. Detailed re-tellings by people who witnessed these things happen. Yes, you might be correct that the numbers aren't accurate. Who cares? There was a coordinated effort to systematically murder people based on their heritage. Auschwitz and many other camps like it did exist, and the records we have from there are excessive and detailed.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say beyond "There might have been fewer deaths than we thought." Yeah, okay, cool. Mildly interesting on an academic level. that does not excuse the fact that it happened. "less people were brutally murdered by the nazi regime, so the nazi regime couldn't have been so bad."
User avatar #39 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Of course there's no question such an event did occur, but it wasn't the only aspect of nazi germany and therefore nazi germany wasn't completely bad (refer to #16, germany wanted to end the war, the nazi party ended unemployment and poverty etc.)
#40 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
You are correct. No one is ever black and white evil/good.

With that in mind, the good they did in no way excuses the evil, just like the US was wrong for imprisoning Japanese citizens during the war with japan and then not returning their property afterwards.
#180 - K goodnight. 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -2
#30 - Debatable. There is evidence supporting the holocaust was/is e…  [+] (7 new replies) 09/27/2014 on context -5
#31 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
Ohh, that one time a man herded people into inhumane camps to work and starve to death, then be burned afterwards was exaggerated? Guess it doesn't mean jack shit now. Thanks.
User avatar #32 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Did you listen to what I said, or even look at the links i provided?
#33 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
Yup. Not sure what you're implying I missed. A single location where they had simple technology for the gas chambers and they didn't find corpses strewn about doesn't mean the events that did occur weren't atrocious.
User avatar #36 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
What I meant was the death statistics and conditions were exaggerated. How would a gas chamber work with wooden doors? Why weren't there any bodies or ash found were there should have been? Ask yourself these questions and reply again.
#38 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
A gas chamber would work just fine with wooden doors you git. They didn't always use the same types of gas, and big surprise - wood can form an air-tight seal. Ever head of stuffing a towel under a doorway during a fire or gas leak? ffs.

And again, a single event where they couldn't find the remains of people does not discredit the entirety of the event. There are plenty of locations where they FOUND corpses, have images of people being executed. Detailed re-tellings by people who witnessed these things happen. Yes, you might be correct that the numbers aren't accurate. Who cares? There was a coordinated effort to systematically murder people based on their heritage. Auschwitz and many other camps like it did exist, and the records we have from there are excessive and detailed.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say beyond "There might have been fewer deaths than we thought." Yeah, okay, cool. Mildly interesting on an academic level. that does not excuse the fact that it happened. "less people were brutally murdered by the nazi regime, so the nazi regime couldn't have been so bad."
User avatar #39 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Of course there's no question such an event did occur, but it wasn't the only aspect of nazi germany and therefore nazi germany wasn't completely bad (refer to #16, germany wanted to end the war, the nazi party ended unemployment and poverty etc.)
#40 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
You are correct. No one is ever black and white evil/good.

With that in mind, the good they did in no way excuses the evil, just like the US was wrong for imprisoning Japanese citizens during the war with japan and then not returning their property afterwards.
#176 - How can you know I would do that? I even thumbed up every comm…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #179 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
happened before, will happen again, maybe not from you. but from someone it will. anyway, im sick and im gonna go sleep..

if you wanna watch something, whatever, go watch documentary "thrive" its pretty cool, some shit in it may sound ridicioulus, but it has some good points that may or may not be true. its definitely worth a watch (atleast its interesting) whether you believe shit like that or not.

i watched it and i dont believe half of shit i saw, but its definetly something to keep at back of my head
User avatar #180 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
K goodnight.
#170 - As dieterkaiser said, there are ways to betterment. Disagreein…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #173 - dieterkaiser (09/27/2014) [-]
I wouldn't put it in such drastic terms. I would say it's more like wanting to help someone cure a crippling phobia i know those two aren't the same, but it's the closest thing i could get to a mental condition of comparable severity .
#165 - That's nice for you then. If you'd want to have kids you could.  [+] (1 new reply) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #167 - cya (09/27/2014) [-]
alright then
#12 - so miscarriage is twi interdasting  [+] (1 new reply) 09/27/2014 on 4chan posts Comp +1
#13 - miscarriage (09/27/2014) [-]
i was unbanned but my password was still changed so I use this fegs account
#160 - IF a house was on fire you'd want to put it out, right? Homose…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -4
User avatar #161 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
Now I see the problem here

You're intolerant.
#158 - By your logic if someone I knew would beat his kids I couldn't…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -5
User avatar #159 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
No,you can't disagree with the fact that he's beating his kids,because HE IS beating them.

You cannot disagree about his reasons,you cannot disagree about the FACTS,but you can disagree that it is a good thing to do as beating a kid is a choice.

Being homosex ISN'T


And that's why you can't "disagree with homosexuality",because homosexuality isn't a person,isn't a statement,isn't a judgement,nor a theory nor an hypothesis... It's a state. Just like "hey my house is in fire". You can tell your house not to be in fire for that matters,but you can't tell it that you disagree with it being in fire.
User avatar #160 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
IF a house was on fire you'd want to put it out, right? Homosexuality might not be a choice but there are ways to betterment.
User avatar #161 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
Now I see the problem here

You're intolerant.
#153 - Appearantly you get to decide what people can and can not disa…  [+] (5 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #156 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
But there's nothing to fucking disagree with on which planet do you fucking live

Gays blow men,you don't have jackshit to say on that. They blow men. The fuck there's to say about this? By your logic if I say "I love bananas" you'd be "able" to disagree with the fact that I love bananas.
User avatar #158 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
By your logic if someone I knew would beat his kids I couldn't disagree with him about beating kids because it's "his" thing. Also you act like I questioned the existence of homosexuality which I don't, I simply think it is detrimental and therefore disagree with it, end of story.
User avatar #159 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
No,you can't disagree with the fact that he's beating his kids,because HE IS beating them.

You cannot disagree about his reasons,you cannot disagree about the FACTS,but you can disagree that it is a good thing to do as beating a kid is a choice.

Being homosex ISN'T


And that's why you can't "disagree with homosexuality",because homosexuality isn't a person,isn't a statement,isn't a judgement,nor a theory nor an hypothesis... It's a state. Just like "hey my house is in fire". You can tell your house not to be in fire for that matters,but you can't tell it that you disagree with it being in fire.
User avatar #160 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
IF a house was on fire you'd want to put it out, right? Homosexuality might not be a choice but there are ways to betterment.
User avatar #161 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
Now I see the problem here

You're intolerant.
#152 - Here we are again. You think everything the government says is…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #172 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
if i started giving you links, you would instantly call me tin foil hurr conspiracy theory idiot and post picture "tips fedora" or some shit. and i would get laughed at and redthumbed to oblivion. i dont care, believe what you want.
User avatar #176 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
How can you know I would do that? I even thumbed up every comment in this thread (apart from my own obviously).
User avatar #179 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
happened before, will happen again, maybe not from you. but from someone it will. anyway, im sick and im gonna go sleep..

if you wanna watch something, whatever, go watch documentary "thrive" its pretty cool, some shit in it may sound ridicioulus, but it has some good points that may or may not be true. its definitely worth a watch (atleast its interesting) whether you believe shit like that or not.

i watched it and i dont believe half of shit i saw, but its definetly something to keep at back of my head
User avatar #180 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
K goodnight.
#149 - We are not discussing apples, we are discussing homosexuality,… 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -1
#146 - I don't have to prove you wrong; the burden of proof is on you…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs +1
User avatar #155 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
But since you really really want it, here for over fishing irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fisheries_Depletion_full_case_study_web.pdf
Wiki about overfishing for an easier reading although not much about how much as been fished already en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfishing
Wiki regarding world population en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
And no this is not where I found all my info regarding it, that has come from various sources over the years.
User avatar #150 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
If the burden of proof is on me it's also on you, it goes both ways.
You want me to show you proof of me being right start with showing proof of me being wrong first, any of these things I have said can easily be checked by some simple google searches were you are a bit picky of what sites you check.
#144 - There are absolutely no organizations or individuals which are…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #148 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
i just qouted what you said but change it a little, works both ways.

if you came here with .gov sources and expected real conversation then you are dumber then those who write that bullshit..
User avatar #152 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Here we are again. You think everything the government says is always wrong? Give me something that disproves the CDC's statistics.
User avatar #172 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
if i started giving you links, you would instantly call me tin foil hurr conspiracy theory idiot and post picture "tips fedora" or some shit. and i would get laughed at and redthumbed to oblivion. i dont care, believe what you want.
User avatar #176 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
How can you know I would do that? I even thumbed up every comment in this thread (apart from my own obviously).
User avatar #179 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
happened before, will happen again, maybe not from you. but from someone it will. anyway, im sick and im gonna go sleep..

if you wanna watch something, whatever, go watch documentary "thrive" its pretty cool, some shit in it may sound ridicioulus, but it has some good points that may or may not be true. its definitely worth a watch (atleast its interesting) whether you believe shit like that or not.

i watched it and i dont believe half of shit i saw, but its definetly something to keep at back of my head
User avatar #180 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
K goodnight.
#140 - The same way I would disagree with a neighbour if he set his h…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs 0
#145 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
Nigga there's like no relation at all with what I just said can you just not into logic I'm talking to you about liking peaches or bananas and you're talking to me about "disagreeing with people setting their houses on fire"


Because surely,if I say "I like apples",the awnser is immediately "NO I DISAGREE THAT YOU LIKE APPLES";and I suppose that's the same,if I decide to set fire to my home,you are really gonna say "I DISAGREE THAT YOU SET FIRE TO YOUR HOME"?

Nigga srsly.
User avatar #149 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
We are not discussing apples, we are discussing homosexuality, which is detrimental because it, i've said it thousands of times in this thread, increases the risk of STD's and prevents you from reproducing.
#138 - That's why we see a doctor when we're ill, don't we?  [+] (1 new reply) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -2
User avatar #141 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
And he gives us good drugs. He doesn't tell you to dance tango naked on a moonlight he's not getting his medical facts where you get yours.
#136 - The CDC statistics are from late 2013. Old? Do you have an…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs +1
User avatar #143 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
Do you think all who got aflitcted by it all get completely cured of it?
Many of them still lives which affect the statistics and still the choices of using protection is still a personal one not a sexual preference one.
How much food is coming from fishing do you think, the fishing we are depleting to the extent countries are buying over countries sea borders to also fish, the sea's are being depleted of food and when all that food is gone you think we gonna farm it all regulary?
That would more or less mean we have to cut down every single forest to make room for farming instead how sustainable does that sound, and you want proof go and check yourself since you apparently aren't showing any proof of me being wrong either.
Also take a check to see how the population have expanded the last 200 years and think if you really believes we can sustain that kind of expansion for another 100 years.
User avatar #146 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
I don't have to prove you wrong; the burden of proof is on you. I might aswell say "there is a teapot floating between neptune and uranus" and you couldn't prove me wrong so i must be right.
User avatar #155 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
But since you really really want it, here for over fishing irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fisheries_Depletion_full_case_study_web.pdf
Wiki about overfishing for an easier reading although not much about how much as been fished already en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfishing
Wiki regarding world population en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
And no this is not where I found all my info regarding it, that has come from various sources over the years.
User avatar #150 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
If the burden of proof is on me it's also on you, it goes both ways.
You want me to show you proof of me being right start with showing proof of me being wrong first, any of these things I have said can easily be checked by some simple google searches were you are a bit picky of what sites you check.
#134 - "everything the government does and says is completely 10…  [+] (16 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs 0
#142 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
"everything goverment does and says is completely 100% all of time right!!1"

User avatar #147 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
Dude hush you're just out of your league. Mister here can "disagree" with homosexuality. I am an educated scholar and I have absolutely no idea how you do that.
User avatar #153 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Appearantly you get to decide what people can and can not disagree with.
User avatar #156 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
But there's nothing to fucking disagree with on which planet do you fucking live

Gays blow men,you don't have jackshit to say on that. They blow men. The fuck there's to say about this? By your logic if I say "I love bananas" you'd be "able" to disagree with the fact that I love bananas.
User avatar #158 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
By your logic if someone I knew would beat his kids I couldn't disagree with him about beating kids because it's "his" thing. Also you act like I questioned the existence of homosexuality which I don't, I simply think it is detrimental and therefore disagree with it, end of story.
User avatar #159 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
No,you can't disagree with the fact that he's beating his kids,because HE IS beating them.

You cannot disagree about his reasons,you cannot disagree about the FACTS,but you can disagree that it is a good thing to do as beating a kid is a choice.

Being homosex ISN'T


And that's why you can't "disagree with homosexuality",because homosexuality isn't a person,isn't a statement,isn't a judgement,nor a theory nor an hypothesis... It's a state. Just like "hey my house is in fire". You can tell your house not to be in fire for that matters,but you can't tell it that you disagree with it being in fire.
User avatar #160 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
IF a house was on fire you'd want to put it out, right? Homosexuality might not be a choice but there are ways to betterment.
User avatar #161 - aldkai (09/27/2014) [-]
Now I see the problem here

You're intolerant.
User avatar #151 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
im not saying he CANT disagree with that, i just said .gov sources are joke and he shouldnt give that as legitimate statistic.
User avatar #144 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
There are absolutely no organizations or individuals which are always 100% right, now if we followed your logic we couldn't even cite any source because it might be wrong. Heck we couldn't even say or do anything because it might be wrong. Sounds like a nice world to live in right?
User avatar #148 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
i just qouted what you said but change it a little, works both ways.

if you came here with .gov sources and expected real conversation then you are dumber then those who write that bullshit..
User avatar #152 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Here we are again. You think everything the government says is always wrong? Give me something that disproves the CDC's statistics.
User avatar #172 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
if i started giving you links, you would instantly call me tin foil hurr conspiracy theory idiot and post picture "tips fedora" or some shit. and i would get laughed at and redthumbed to oblivion. i dont care, believe what you want.
User avatar #176 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
How can you know I would do that? I even thumbed up every comment in this thread (apart from my own obviously).
User avatar #179 - eating (09/27/2014) [-]
happened before, will happen again, maybe not from you. but from someone it will. anyway, im sick and im gonna go sleep..

if you wanna watch something, whatever, go watch documentary "thrive" its pretty cool, some shit in it may sound ridicioulus, but it has some good points that may or may not be true. its definitely worth a watch (atleast its interesting) whether you believe shit like that or not.

i watched it and i dont believe half of shit i saw, but its definetly something to keep at back of my head
User avatar #180 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
K goodnight.
#132 - Homosexuals are much more likely to contract STD's than hetero…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs 0
User avatar #135 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
Those are old statistics from time when people were unseure how std actually did spread and condoms were almost only used for protection against pregnancys which meant homosexuals did have a lot of sex without protection not knowing that it would spread.
No supplies has not been growing, we have been taking from our reserves, how long do you think it would take to regrow the forests and re populate the seas?
Mostly about the sea the production has not increased we have just been taking more and more out of it without letting it grow up again.
User avatar #136 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
The CDC statistics are from late 2013. Old?
Do you have any evidence to back up your claims how we are "taking from our reserves"? Agriculture is still a thriving business to this day, farming hasn't stopped, and therefore we are still producing food, not taking from "reserves".
User avatar #143 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
Do you think all who got aflitcted by it all get completely cured of it?
Many of them still lives which affect the statistics and still the choices of using protection is still a personal one not a sexual preference one.
How much food is coming from fishing do you think, the fishing we are depleting to the extent countries are buying over countries sea borders to also fish, the sea's are being depleted of food and when all that food is gone you think we gonna farm it all regulary?
That would more or less mean we have to cut down every single forest to make room for farming instead how sustainable does that sound, and you want proof go and check yourself since you apparently aren't showing any proof of me being wrong either.
Also take a check to see how the population have expanded the last 200 years and think if you really believes we can sustain that kind of expansion for another 100 years.
User avatar #146 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
I don't have to prove you wrong; the burden of proof is on you. I might aswell say "there is a teapot floating between neptune and uranus" and you couldn't prove me wrong so i must be right.
User avatar #155 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
But since you really really want it, here for over fishing irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fisheries_Depletion_full_case_study_web.pdf
Wiki about overfishing for an easier reading although not much about how much as been fished already en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfishing
Wiki regarding world population en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
And no this is not where I found all my info regarding it, that has come from various sources over the years.
User avatar #150 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
If the burden of proof is on me it's also on you, it goes both ways.
You want me to show you proof of me being right start with showing proof of me being wrong first, any of these things I have said can easily be checked by some simple google searches were you are a bit picky of what sites you check.
#16 - Hitler's aims were not evil. He, at first, eliminated poverty,…  [+] (9 new replies) 09/27/2014 on context -4
#27 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
As he murdered millions of people in concentration camps, yeah.
User avatar #30 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Debatable. There is evidence supporting the holocaust was/is exaggerated.
Ground Penetrating Radar study in Treblinka camp found no signs of dead bodies or ash - archive.org/details/TreblinkaInvestigation-GroundPenetratingRadarStudy
Gas chambers with wooden doors - www.historiography-project.com/misc/doors.html
#31 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
Ohh, that one time a man herded people into inhumane camps to work and starve to death, then be burned afterwards was exaggerated? Guess it doesn't mean jack shit now. Thanks.
User avatar #32 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Did you listen to what I said, or even look at the links i provided?
#33 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
Yup. Not sure what you're implying I missed. A single location where they had simple technology for the gas chambers and they didn't find corpses strewn about doesn't mean the events that did occur weren't atrocious.
User avatar #36 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
What I meant was the death statistics and conditions were exaggerated. How would a gas chamber work with wooden doors? Why weren't there any bodies or ash found were there should have been? Ask yourself these questions and reply again.
#38 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
A gas chamber would work just fine with wooden doors you git. They didn't always use the same types of gas, and big surprise - wood can form an air-tight seal. Ever head of stuffing a towel under a doorway during a fire or gas leak? ffs.

And again, a single event where they couldn't find the remains of people does not discredit the entirety of the event. There are plenty of locations where they FOUND corpses, have images of people being executed. Detailed re-tellings by people who witnessed these things happen. Yes, you might be correct that the numbers aren't accurate. Who cares? There was a coordinated effort to systematically murder people based on their heritage. Auschwitz and many other camps like it did exist, and the records we have from there are excessive and detailed.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say beyond "There might have been fewer deaths than we thought." Yeah, okay, cool. Mildly interesting on an academic level. that does not excuse the fact that it happened. "less people were brutally murdered by the nazi regime, so the nazi regime couldn't have been so bad."
User avatar #39 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Of course there's no question such an event did occur, but it wasn't the only aspect of nazi germany and therefore nazi germany wasn't completely bad (refer to #16, germany wanted to end the war, the nazi party ended unemployment and poverty etc.)
#40 - sytheris (09/27/2014) [-]
You are correct. No one is ever black and white evil/good.

With that in mind, the good they did in no way excuses the evil, just like the US was wrong for imprisoning Japanese citizens during the war with japan and then not returning their property afterwards.
#123 - I don't hate gay people, i am against homosexuality, because (…  [+] (17 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs +1
User avatar #202 - nimba (09/27/2014) [-]
Homosexual women can reproduce just fine. And homosexual men do the service to society of adoption. Surely adoption is a more noble act than burgeoning the world with even more children?
User avatar #204 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
So you think youth is a burden to the world?
User avatar #207 - nimba (09/27/2014) [-]
You think it is better children starve to death than not be born at all? I can build strawmen too, you know.
User avatar #210 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Who says if you had children they would starve to death?
User avatar #224 - hoponthefeelstrain (09/27/2014) [-]
the fact of the matter is there are children who are already born who need a loving home, why not give them one instead of just making more children? That's what gay men and some gay women do. They're doing more good than you are.

you keep saying overpopulation doesn't matter as long as we have food. We cut down more forests to make room for all these people and by cutting down the forest we ruin ecosystems, reduce our oxygen supply, and open ourselves up to knew diseases. A lot of animals carry diseases that don't effect them but can be deadly to humans like AIDS coming from chimps and Ebola that came from bats. When we take their homes they move into ours, them and their diseases.

Also what's so terrible about not reproducing? Plenty of straight people are infertile or just simply don't want children, do you disagree with infertility?
User avatar #221 - nimba (09/27/2014) [-]
Just because a probelm does not affect my children directly doesn not mean it doesn't affect others. There is a deficit between current food output and food requirement. Until that problem is solved, it is selfish to increase the food requirement. This is a pretty tangential point.
User avatar #164 - cya (09/27/2014) [-]
i'm bisexual
i don't wanna have kids
use condoms and practice safe sex
User avatar #165 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
That's nice for you then. If you'd want to have kids you could.
User avatar #167 - cya (09/27/2014) [-]
alright then
User avatar #125 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
No it does not increases the risk of STD, peoples choices increases the chances.
And about the reproduction part we already have an over populated earth as well as we got technology to let people reproduce even without sex between man and woman.
User avatar #132 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Homosexuals are much more likely to contract STD's than heterosexuals, the statistics are there (Refer to #92). We don't have an overpopulated earth, food production and supply has been growing proportionally to the growth of human population and will continue to do so. Once it stops growing, we can talk about an overpopulated earth.
User avatar #135 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
Those are old statistics from time when people were unseure how std actually did spread and condoms were almost only used for protection against pregnancys which meant homosexuals did have a lot of sex without protection not knowing that it would spread.
No supplies has not been growing, we have been taking from our reserves, how long do you think it would take to regrow the forests and re populate the seas?
Mostly about the sea the production has not increased we have just been taking more and more out of it without letting it grow up again.
User avatar #136 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
The CDC statistics are from late 2013. Old?
Do you have any evidence to back up your claims how we are "taking from our reserves"? Agriculture is still a thriving business to this day, farming hasn't stopped, and therefore we are still producing food, not taking from "reserves".
User avatar #143 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
Do you think all who got aflitcted by it all get completely cured of it?
Many of them still lives which affect the statistics and still the choices of using protection is still a personal one not a sexual preference one.
How much food is coming from fishing do you think, the fishing we are depleting to the extent countries are buying over countries sea borders to also fish, the sea's are being depleted of food and when all that food is gone you think we gonna farm it all regulary?
That would more or less mean we have to cut down every single forest to make room for farming instead how sustainable does that sound, and you want proof go and check yourself since you apparently aren't showing any proof of me being wrong either.
Also take a check to see how the population have expanded the last 200 years and think if you really believes we can sustain that kind of expansion for another 100 years.
User avatar #146 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
I don't have to prove you wrong; the burden of proof is on you. I might aswell say "there is a teapot floating between neptune and uranus" and you couldn't prove me wrong so i must be right.
User avatar #155 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
But since you really really want it, here for over fishing irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fisheries_Depletion_full_case_study_web.pdf
Wiki about overfishing for an easier reading although not much about how much as been fished already en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfishing
Wiki regarding world population en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
And no this is not where I found all my info regarding it, that has come from various sources over the years.
User avatar #150 - stifflimb (09/27/2014) [-]
If the burden of proof is on me it's also on you, it goes both ways.
You want me to show you proof of me being right start with showing proof of me being wrong first, any of these things I have said can easily be checked by some simple google searches were you are a bit picky of what sites you check.
#102 - Nothing's stopping them, however, as I said, surrogacy is onl…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -5
User avatar #116 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/guide/using-surrogate-mother

"For instance, when gay men use a traditional surrogate, one of them uses his sperm to fertilize the surrogate's egg through artificial insemination. The surrogate then carries the baby and gives birth."
#111 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
"homosexual men who want to have children of their own can't."
Excuse the language, but why the fuck not?

Step 1. Acquire a surrogate mother
Step 2. Impregnate that bitch
Step 3. ????
Step 4. Keep the child

User avatar #187 - theoneweirdguy (09/27/2014) [-]
OR Or orrr.....

Adoption is an option.
#201 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
I guess you could call it an additional option
User avatar #239 - theoneweirdguy (09/27/2014) [-]
Hey, hey!
User avatar #199 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
Or that
#99 - Surrogacy is only an option for female homosexual couples. …  [+] (8 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Gay Signs -3
User avatar #100 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
What's stopping a doctor from taking a gay guy's sperm and inserting it into a surrogate mother? You know, the whole point of it being a surrogate mother
User avatar #102 - clechyl (09/27/2014) [-]
Nothing's stopping them, however, as I said, surrogacy is only an option for females, homosexual men who want to have children of their own can't.
User avatar #116 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/guide/using-surrogate-mother

"For instance, when gay men use a traditional surrogate, one of them uses his sperm to fertilize the surrogate's egg through artificial insemination. The surrogate then carries the baby and gives birth."
#111 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
"homosexual men who want to have children of their own can't."
Excuse the language, but why the fuck not?

Step 1. Acquire a surrogate mother
Step 2. Impregnate that bitch
Step 3. ????
Step 4. Keep the child

User avatar #187 - theoneweirdguy (09/27/2014) [-]
OR Or orrr.....

Adoption is an option.
#201 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
I guess you could call it an additional option
User avatar #239 - theoneweirdguy (09/27/2014) [-]
Hey, hey!
User avatar #199 - testaburger (09/27/2014) [-]
Or that
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1437 / Total items point value: 5906

Comments(37):

clechyl has disabled anonymous comments.
 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
User avatar #37 - clechyl (10/27/2014) [-]
**clechyl rolled user vladhellsing **
User avatar #34 - krasnogvardiech (07/07/2014) [-]
You bastard.
User avatar #35 to #34 - clechyl (07/07/2014) [-]
y-you too
User avatar #33 - meglomaniac (07/06/2014) [-]
just wanted to say well done and ty for the post about why nasa should have funding. This is coming from the kid that always wanted to be an aerospace engineer growing up.
#32 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/22/2014) [-]
User avatar #31 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
**** you
#30 - clechyl (04/05/2014) [-]
**clechyl rolled image**
**clechyl rolled image**
#29 - spartanian has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #28 - icrapgoldndiamonds (09/11/2013) [-]
*roll image*
#27 - afternoon (08/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #26 - shikurukato (04/20/2012) [-]
******* congrats. Jesus. haha
User avatar #25 - FJCommenter (03/19/2012) [-]
Hey grats on your first year here, stay with us for another :D
#23 - nospr (06/23/2011) [-]
Did you hear about these so called "photoshop" threads?
#24 to #23 - clechyl (06/24/2011) [-]
No, did you hear Osama died?
No, did you hear Osama died?
#1 - nospr (06/17/2011) [-]
Hey let's do another photoshop thread. Let's destroy this picture.
#2 to #1 - clechyl (06/18/2011) [-]
***** stole part of my office
#3 to #2 - nospr (06/18/2011) [-]
***** cloned part of my office
#4 to #3 - clechyl (06/18/2011) [-]
My desk is floating
#13 to #12 - nospr (06/18/2011) [-]
**nospr rolls 79**
#14 to #13 - clechyl (06/18/2011) [-]
**clechyl rolls 42**
#15 to #14 - nospr (06/18/2011) [-]
**nospr rolls 79**
#16 to #15 - clechyl (06/18/2011) [-]
**clechyl rolls 533,137**
User avatar #22 to #20 - nospr (06/18/2011) [-]
(Do you want to start a new photoshop tennis on my profile?)
#21 to #20 - nospr (06/18/2011) [-]
 
 Friends (0)