|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #230 on CommentsLevel 330 Comments: Practically Famous
OfflineSend mail to clechyl Block clechyl Invite clechyl to be your friend flag avatar
- Text/Links 1
- Pictures 35
- Video 1
- YouTube 3
- Animated Gifs 2
- Friends 11
- Comments34 new6851
- Channels 1
- All 6919
latest user's comments
|#68 - even deeper [+] (2 new replies)||12/23/2014 on Math teacher solves X-mas||0|
|#73 - It was 1.5- no, 4- no, 6 million||12/23/2014 on Trivia Crack is literally...||0|
|#122 - Picture||12/23/2014 on Nignogs||+2|
|#6 - I think the most that shuld be had is 2 Male Female [+] (19 new replies)||12/22/2014 on Tumblrs gender options||+551|
#123 - anonymous (12/23/2014) [-]
#42 - anonymous (12/23/2014) [-]
but some people are actually physical neither/both.
#48 - anonymous (12/23/2014) [-]
#101 - Stamyham (12/23/2014) [-]
#103 - pokemonstheshiz (12/23/2014) [-]
It's literally the definition. Putting a picture of Darwin over some psuedoscientific bs doesn't change that.
"There are more than two sexes: False"
Just because you say something doesn't make it true. Sex classifies things by their reproductive organs. There are many species that are hermaphrodites(that reproduce), should we classify them as an all male species? No, that's fucking stupid.
Also, human hermaphrodites can reproduce. Not with themselves, because they don't truly have full sets of both sex organs, but they can reproduce.
Gender and sex are not the same thing, even if we often use them in place of each other. Consider languages with gendered nouns. Do we say "el telefono" because the phone has a dick, or a Y chromosome? No. We say it because it's perceived as a masculine object.
Not saying I'm 100% right about this, but neither are you. Scientific classifications are debatable, by definition, because science is always changing with new information or ideas. Same goes for language. To be set in ones ways is ignorance in the highest.
#108 - Stamyham (12/23/2014) [-]
None of that is pseudoscience. You can literally learn all of this in an intro level college Biology class. We aren't talking about other species (especially since gender is entirely a social construct, and we're the only species with true societies). Human hermaphrodites don't actually exist, as they don't have two sets of fully functioning sex organs. True hermaphrodites have fully functioning sex tissue of both sexes. If they have a Y sex chromosome, they are male. If not, they are female. They aren't some weird new sex. In all of our history, there has never been a single well documented case of a natural true hermaphrodite (able to reproduce using either set of sex organs) in humans. Klinefelters, hermaphrodites, and most other sex-chromosome related disorders usually result in sterility in the individual.
Of course, gender is for languages. If something is perceived as masculine, it is referred to as masculine. Just as if something has a Y chromosome, it is a male.
Gender isn't defined by science, though! Gender (outside of the grammatical sense) is a purely social construct invented by a psychologist who wanted to feel important. The term "gender" wasn't even used in the modern sense (replacing the word sex) until the 1950s.
Sex is defined by science, and in human history we haven't seen anything that truly breaks from the classifications of "male" or "female". Therefore, it's pretty safe to say that sex is 100% concrete, at least naturally. Sure, eventually we could probably create a new, breeding sex through science. But we haven't yet and likely won't for many years, so I stand by my statements.
#132 - anonymous (12/23/2014) [-]
In which case we need to start genetics tests for the olympics since XXY 'women' are currently allowed to compete in female events.
|#13 - that is ******** i voted on that poll and my … [+] (1 new reply)||12/22/2014 on Disturbing?||0|
|#12 - Picture||12/22/2014 on Niggers thread from /b/||0|
|#11 - Picture||12/22/2014 on Niggers thread from /b/||+1|
|#4 - Picture [+] (3 new replies)||12/22/2014 on guy on right lol||+22|
|#14 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||12/22/2014 on gotta go faster||+20|
|#86 - Picture||12/22/2014 on Oops, You Bwoke It!||0|
|#22 - Picture||12/22/2014 on teacher's photos||+1|
|#29 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||12/22/2014 on 4chan Comp||0|
|#27 - The pot actually had one handle, similar to that of a frying pan. [+] (3 new replies)||12/22/2014 on 4chan Comp||0|
|#23 - T-That'll come off, right? [+] (1 new reply)||12/21/2014 on Cringe||+17|
#85 - isbestpony (12/22/2014) [-]
|#18 - I can not fathom the retardation and, on top of all, the cring… [+] (2 new replies)||12/21/2014 on Cringe||+16|
|#14 - Bad news: there's more. [+] (2 new replies)||12/21/2014 on Cringe||+20|
#22 - anonymous (12/21/2014) [-]
cringey, but not as bad, there's thousands upon thousands of SKS's out there, and they dont have as big a historical significance as WWII era rifles
|#11 - Picture||12/21/2014 on Cringe||+21|
|#12 - left side mustard rice||12/21/2014 on Two kinds of people||0|
|#5 - Picture||12/21/2014 on 4chan Comp||+6|
|#7 - Picture||12/21/2014 on SCREAMIN EAGLE||+19|
|#117 - Picture||12/21/2014 on Happy Helliday's Give-Away||+5|
|#31 - but i thought biebergotswag?||12/21/2014 on Justin Bieber over the...||+1|
|#22 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||12/21/2014 on Racism nd shit Pt.2||+12|
|#11 - yea tell us what he said!||12/21/2014 on (untitled)||+1|
|#8 - Wait, Cough, Tough and Rough don't rhyme? [+] (5 new replies)||12/21/2014 on (untitled)||0|
#20 - Stevethewizard (12/21/2014) [-]
Except rhyming has to do with the consonant sound at the end of the word's final syllable and the inflection on it by any vowels. As a result of this, these words do rhyme.
It's the same way "over" and "silver" rhyme. It is a true rhyme, just not a traditional rhyme.
clechyl has disabled anonymous comments.