Upload
Login or register

ciarancrashy

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:4/06/2013
Last Login:7/30/2016
Location:Ireland
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6901
Comment Ranking:#3731
Highest Content Rank:#6870
Highest Comment Rank:#2920
Content Thumbs: 87 total,  117 ,  30
Comment Thumbs: 2428 total,  2610 ,  182
Content Level Progress: 80% (4/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 3% (3/100)
Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:10182
Times Content Favorited:6 times
Total Comments Made:336
FJ Points:2183
I like beer

latest user's comments

#159 - wut? I haven't deleted any comments  [+] (2 new replies) 06/12/2016 on Cultural Enrichment 0
User avatar
#160 - geeky (06/12/2016) [-]
I meant in the Youtube video
User avatar
#161 - ciarancrashy (06/12/2016) [-]
Ah okay I never bother to read youtube comments since arguing with a brick wall is easier
#23 - In Ireland, we have travelers. Their essentially gypsies. 06/10/2016 on Cultural Enrichment +1
#16 - For the US, look up trail of tears.  [+] (19 new replies) 06/10/2016 on Cultural Enrichment +10
#17 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
That's just depressing. I mainly brought up Canada because half the time I hear either "oh it happened so long ago" or "we let them keep their culture, they ruined it" and people keep thinking of Canada as too peaceful to pull anything and just ignore all the people we fucked up. It's something like First Nations in Canada in the 80's were treated worse than blacks in the US in the 60s. That and we gave all the kids from residential schools a handful of money instead of help, then people today complain about uneducated First Nations adults in Canada like it's their fault.
User avatar
#25 - megakillerx (06/10/2016) [-]
"Oh boo hoo, dem ebil white ppl destroyed glorious injun culture :'((((((("

I have no sympathy for a group of people who haven't advanced from the Stone Age, have such a weak immune system that they almost got killed off because some wanker accidentally sneezed on them and then centuries later are still to retarded to become part of civilized society that they had to be properly schooled in order to abandon their shitty way of life.

"B-but muh Mesoamericans!" Oh, you mean those nations that where on par with early Bronze Age civilisations, had a brutal slave system, and for the case of the Aztecs sacrificed up to 20 000 people per year as part of their religious rituals, AND where also to retarded to understand the concepts of wheels.

Even the Sami in my home country Sweden knows that our way of living is way better for them. And for that, they have my respect.
User avatar
#43 - SuperCollider (06/11/2016) [-]
Hi, I'm reading you're post in complete bewilderment. I'm an archaeologist -- from what I've just read it appears that you know nothing on the topic you're writing about. Just a heads up. I'm not sure what you're level of education is but it's clear that you have much to learn.
User avatar
#121 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
Prove me then, in what way am I wrong? What have I written that is empirically and historically wrong? Instead of playing the high horse, post some evidence to back your claims. I'm all up to do that aswell.
#136 - SuperCollider (06/11/2016) [-]
The onus is on you to demonstrate the veracity of your statement.

But I will pick apart a few things...

You mention the Stone Age and Bronze Age in a way that seems to imply a universal teleology. That is, you seem to think societies "advance" or progress towards higher levels of complexity -- this is a theory we know as Progressive Developmentalism and was first formalized by Emanuel Kant in the late 1700s. This simply isn't the case. Centuries of scholarship demonstrate that history is, in fact, contingent. So archaeologically, the way you apply Stone Age and Bronze age is extremely outdated. You essentially know nothing on this topic, otherwise you'd know that almost all peoples in the New World were agriculturalists and that those who weren't we're constantly trading with those who were. The same goes for peoples in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Oceania.

Another point -- you claim that Mesoamericans were at a "Bronze Age level" when Europeans arrived. Again, this is absolutely false. Comparatively speaking, Late Mesoamerican state societies like the Aztec were technologically on par with Europeans, and were ahead in several aspects. Curiously, you mention that "they were also to [<-- your own typo] retarded to invent the wheel" -- besides the flagrant racism in that comment, are you aware that we have several archaeological examples of wheels from pre-Colonial Mesoamerica? They've been found as parts of children's toys. But the important question here -- tell me what good a wheel is to a society that has ZERO large domesticated mammals? And that wasn't because they were "retarded" -- lowland neotropical forests (as an aside I've worked in several of these areas in South America) are entirely bereft of large mammals -- the largest being the jaguar/black panther. And while we're on the topic of the Aztecs, are you really going to argue that Europeans were morally superior? Considering the unprecedented levels of violence in Europe at that time, that's a pretty pointless claim to make.

One last point -- do you actually know anything about epidemiology? The diseases that were brought over by Europeans initially emerged through prolonged contact with animal domesticates, a relationship that had been ongoing for thousands of years. Combined with this and similar diseases that emerged from Africa and Asia, it's no wonder how such virulent diseases came about in these circumstances yet were nearly absent in the New World. Again it comes down to the issue of animal domestication, of which New World peoples had almost no suitable options. There were animal domesticates, particularly in Western South America, but they were mostly kept away from humans and diseases were therefore far less likely to jump from those domesticates to humans.

Anyways, thought I'd pick out those two points. But like I said, the onus is ultimately on you to prove your statements. It's not up to me to prove you wrong at this point, especially since you don't seem to have any factually established argument to make.
User avatar
#147 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
At what way where the Aztecs technologically or morally superior to Europeans? We know that most MesoAmerican society never devolved their weaponry past bronze metal. Their temples worked identically in terms of religious practices, food storaging and size as the Sumerian temples found in Mesopotamia
www.crystalinks.com/sumereligion.html
www.aztec-history.com/aztec-temples.html

Only the Mayans have been recorded of all the societies in America to have developed a written language: www.cogsci.indiana.edu/farg/rehling/nativeAm/ling.html

Morally I would without a doubt say that the Europeans where definitely superior to the Aztecs. Not only do they have their infamous blood sacrifices where they cut open the victims chest, rip out their heart, behead them and then kick them down the temple steps. But their version of football risked their losing team to be beheaded on the spot (assuming that none of the players didn't die from internal injuries afterwards)
www.ancient-origins.net/news-history/ulama-mesoamerican-ball-game-deadly-sport-ancient-americas-003156

And for the domestic animals excuse, the North American horse went extinct around 12000 years ago and the earliest known findings of humans in North America where tribes people who crossed the Beirut strait 13,500 years ago. So you mean to tell me that for a millennium and a half their ancestors didn't realise the benefits of domesticating a fine specimen such as the horse?
www.horsetalk.co.nz/2012/11/29/why-did-horses-die-out-in-north-america/#axzz4AkjOFPIF

Hell, even post Colombian history they had centuries to catch up with the European settlers and what they did most of the time was buying guns from them and kicking each other's teeth in. Becoming nothing more than bandits with funny looking feather hats.
User avatar
#155 - SuperCollider (06/11/2016) [-]
I never argued that Aztecs wre morally superior than Europeans -- I did however point out that comparing these sides is fruitless since Europeans partook in similar acts of public cruelty. Think about the sectarian violence and pogroms against Jews and heretics for example. You can also look at the brutality of public religious/political corporal punishment in Europe as another example.

You ask why New World peoples did not domesticate the horse before their extinction ca. 12,000 ya. In all of human history, the earliest evidence of the domestication of the horse is found around 3000 BCE in the area that is today Kazakhstan. There are examples of Paleolithic cave art throughout Euraisia from ca. 30,000 BCE with images of wild horses being hunted by people. So why are you complaining that New World peoples were unable to domesticate the horse in 1500 years when it took humans 27,000 years (and probably far longer since people had been in Eurasia for longer than 30,000 years) to domesticate the horse. Furthermore, not all animals are domesticable -- why do you then automatically assume that the Pleistocene Horse was domesticable, especially since we know essentially nothing beyond its physical skeletal characteristics?

Mayan's were not the only New World peoples to develop a writing system -- it's now apparent that Andean peoples probably developed some form of written communication through the quipu system. Sadly, the Spanish burnt almost all of these out of a fear of rebellion and heresy so our understanding of these has been extremely slow since only a handful remain. Also, with the Mayan case, it turns out that people developed this system of writing extremely fast -- especially when you consider that people had been living in Europe (ie Britain and the Mediterranean since about 40,000 BCE, though somewhat intermittently in Britain) and in the Middle East for far longer. Furthermore, writing was an independent invention in the New World -- in the Old World, writing was something that diffused into neighbouring territories and was used as needed (or not) by those who lived in those areas, or was forced upon people through conquest.


#29 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
So your justification of your lack of empathy is basically "might makes right."
That's not psychopathic at all.
User avatar
#31 - megakillerx (06/10/2016) [-]
No, that's being realistic m8. Do you really think any empire or civilisation was built upon flowers, roses and pretty words to each other? The strongest civilisation paves forward while the weaker ones must keep up in order to survive. That's what European pagans did while converting to Christianity, that's what the Japanese did in the Victorian era, the Injuns and Africans didn't and they payed the price. That's the way of life.
#32 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
OK, so you believe in might is right. That's cool, just not very empathetic.
A civ based on flowers and pretty words sounds lovely. At least they wouldn't be destroying their environment.
User avatar
#33 - megakillerx (06/10/2016) [-]
Of course the White guilting anon is also a bloody hippie.You probably believe in the noble savage myth aswell.
#35 - anon (06/11/2016) [-]
White guilting? lmao what did I say to make you think that. Victim complex much? I'm literally only advocating for basic human empathy. Of course you don't have to feel guilt for something you didn't do. That normally goes without saying except when talking to faggots on this website.

Concern for the environment makes me a hippie? If the alternative is ruining the planet that I live on, resulting in my painful death, then sure. Proud hippie.
User avatar
#39 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
False sense of superiority much? You where the one crying about residential schools over a linked video taking a piss on pro immigration.

The Enviroment can be preserved without tearing down the fabrics of society and civilisation like a fucking hippie advocates for.
#40 - anon (06/11/2016) [-]
Hahaha "false sense of superiority" dude stop projecting your insecurities on everyone else, it's embarrassing. I was the one what? I'm anon, this is my first interaction with you. Are you autistic or something?
The "fabric of society" can be preserved without suspending all human empathy.
User avatar
#125 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
Yeah, keep dodging the discussion anon. Shows how intelligent and morally superior you are.
#34 - nightgazer (06/11/2016) [-]
So basically survival of the fittest,eh?

What do you think we are? Animals?
User avatar
#36 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
I don't believe that the natives dindu nuffin and that Europeans where baby eating monsters as portrayed by white guilting liberals in universities.
#38 - nightgazer (06/11/2016) [-]
You're replying to the wrong person Dude...

But yes,i agree with you in that regard,in my opinion,every side is in the wrong
User avatar
#23 - ciarancrashy (06/10/2016) [-]
In Ireland, we have travelers. Their essentially gypsies.
#509 - My bad 06/10/2016 on "delete your account" 0
#4 - Relevant  [+] (26 new replies) 06/10/2016 on Cultural Enrichment +26
#52 - geeky (06/11/2016) [-]
I agree with the message this video's sending and the parallels it draws to current affairs, but you can't expect anyone to take your content seriously when you disable comments. It just makes you look like an echo chamber.
User avatar
#159 - ciarancrashy (06/12/2016) [-]
wut?

I haven't deleted any comments
User avatar
#160 - geeky (06/12/2016) [-]
I meant in the Youtube video
User avatar
#161 - ciarancrashy (06/12/2016) [-]
Ah okay I never bother to read youtube comments since arguing with a brick wall is easier
#14 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
Okay I don't know about the US, but as for Canada goes this is such a load of complete bullshit. Ya, let's pretend Canada didn't make residential schools, take first nations children away (by force) and attempt to force them to assimilate through physical and emotional abuse. People fucking died in those schools, locking kids "unwilling to assimilate" in with other kids suffering from tuberculosis was considered an okay punishment, and these schools didn't close until 1996.

Also there's the Northwest Rebellion, where Canadians attacked the city of Batoche for not wanting to give up land that had been "sold" by the Hudson's Bay after the Bay company had just decided it was theirs. The leader was found innocent by six WHITE judges and still hanged by the Prime Minister.

It may not be the same for the US, but that title implies all white people took over harmlessly, and were perfectly okay with the first nations keeping their culture, which is the exact opposite of what happened in Canada.
User avatar
#22 - AnomynousUser (06/10/2016) [-]
The video wasn't made to accurately depict what happened in the past, but to demonstrate what the creators think is happening now. It's supposed to parody the present through the "past" to point out what the creators see as happening in a way that will make people with opposing opinions understand.

I'm trying really hard here to say this neutrally since I don't want to deal with the flame wars, but I hope I made sense.
User avatar
#16 - ciarancrashy (06/10/2016) [-]
For the US, look up trail of tears.
#17 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
That's just depressing. I mainly brought up Canada because half the time I hear either "oh it happened so long ago" or "we let them keep their culture, they ruined it" and people keep thinking of Canada as too peaceful to pull anything and just ignore all the people we fucked up. It's something like First Nations in Canada in the 80's were treated worse than blacks in the US in the 60s. That and we gave all the kids from residential schools a handful of money instead of help, then people today complain about uneducated First Nations adults in Canada like it's their fault.
User avatar
#25 - megakillerx (06/10/2016) [-]
"Oh boo hoo, dem ebil white ppl destroyed glorious injun culture :'((((((("

I have no sympathy for a group of people who haven't advanced from the Stone Age, have such a weak immune system that they almost got killed off because some wanker accidentally sneezed on them and then centuries later are still to retarded to become part of civilized society that they had to be properly schooled in order to abandon their shitty way of life.

"B-but muh Mesoamericans!" Oh, you mean those nations that where on par with early Bronze Age civilisations, had a brutal slave system, and for the case of the Aztecs sacrificed up to 20 000 people per year as part of their religious rituals, AND where also to retarded to understand the concepts of wheels.

Even the Sami in my home country Sweden knows that our way of living is way better for them. And for that, they have my respect.
User avatar
#43 - SuperCollider (06/11/2016) [-]
Hi, I'm reading you're post in complete bewilderment. I'm an archaeologist -- from what I've just read it appears that you know nothing on the topic you're writing about. Just a heads up. I'm not sure what you're level of education is but it's clear that you have much to learn.
User avatar
#121 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
Prove me then, in what way am I wrong? What have I written that is empirically and historically wrong? Instead of playing the high horse, post some evidence to back your claims. I'm all up to do that aswell.
#136 - SuperCollider (06/11/2016) [-]
The onus is on you to demonstrate the veracity of your statement.

But I will pick apart a few things...

You mention the Stone Age and Bronze Age in a way that seems to imply a universal teleology. That is, you seem to think societies "advance" or progress towards higher levels of complexity -- this is a theory we know as Progressive Developmentalism and was first formalized by Emanuel Kant in the late 1700s. This simply isn't the case. Centuries of scholarship demonstrate that history is, in fact, contingent. So archaeologically, the way you apply Stone Age and Bronze age is extremely outdated. You essentially know nothing on this topic, otherwise you'd know that almost all peoples in the New World were agriculturalists and that those who weren't we're constantly trading with those who were. The same goes for peoples in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Oceania.

Another point -- you claim that Mesoamericans were at a "Bronze Age level" when Europeans arrived. Again, this is absolutely false. Comparatively speaking, Late Mesoamerican state societies like the Aztec were technologically on par with Europeans, and were ahead in several aspects. Curiously, you mention that "they were also to [<-- your own typo] retarded to invent the wheel" -- besides the flagrant racism in that comment, are you aware that we have several archaeological examples of wheels from pre-Colonial Mesoamerica? They've been found as parts of children's toys. But the important question here -- tell me what good a wheel is to a society that has ZERO large domesticated mammals? And that wasn't because they were "retarded" -- lowland neotropical forests (as an aside I've worked in several of these areas in South America) are entirely bereft of large mammals -- the largest being the jaguar/black panther. And while we're on the topic of the Aztecs, are you really going to argue that Europeans were morally superior? Considering the unprecedented levels of violence in Europe at that time, that's a pretty pointless claim to make.

One last point -- do you actually know anything about epidemiology? The diseases that were brought over by Europeans initially emerged through prolonged contact with animal domesticates, a relationship that had been ongoing for thousands of years. Combined with this and similar diseases that emerged from Africa and Asia, it's no wonder how such virulent diseases came about in these circumstances yet were nearly absent in the New World. Again it comes down to the issue of animal domestication, of which New World peoples had almost no suitable options. There were animal domesticates, particularly in Western South America, but they were mostly kept away from humans and diseases were therefore far less likely to jump from those domesticates to humans.

Anyways, thought I'd pick out those two points. But like I said, the onus is ultimately on you to prove your statements. It's not up to me to prove you wrong at this point, especially since you don't seem to have any factually established argument to make.
User avatar
#147 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
At what way where the Aztecs technologically or morally superior to Europeans? We know that most MesoAmerican society never devolved their weaponry past bronze metal. Their temples worked identically in terms of religious practices, food storaging and size as the Sumerian temples found in Mesopotamia
www.crystalinks.com/sumereligion.html
www.aztec-history.com/aztec-temples.html

Only the Mayans have been recorded of all the societies in America to have developed a written language: www.cogsci.indiana.edu/farg/rehling/nativeAm/ling.html

Morally I would without a doubt say that the Europeans where definitely superior to the Aztecs. Not only do they have their infamous blood sacrifices where they cut open the victims chest, rip out their heart, behead them and then kick them down the temple steps. But their version of football risked their losing team to be beheaded on the spot (assuming that none of the players didn't die from internal injuries afterwards)
www.ancient-origins.net/news-history/ulama-mesoamerican-ball-game-deadly-sport-ancient-americas-003156

And for the domestic animals excuse, the North American horse went extinct around 12000 years ago and the earliest known findings of humans in North America where tribes people who crossed the Beirut strait 13,500 years ago. So you mean to tell me that for a millennium and a half their ancestors didn't realise the benefits of domesticating a fine specimen such as the horse?
www.horsetalk.co.nz/2012/11/29/why-did-horses-die-out-in-north-america/#axzz4AkjOFPIF

Hell, even post Colombian history they had centuries to catch up with the European settlers and what they did most of the time was buying guns from them and kicking each other's teeth in. Becoming nothing more than bandits with funny looking feather hats.
User avatar
#155 - SuperCollider (06/11/2016) [-]
I never argued that Aztecs wre morally superior than Europeans -- I did however point out that comparing these sides is fruitless since Europeans partook in similar acts of public cruelty. Think about the sectarian violence and pogroms against Jews and heretics for example. You can also look at the brutality of public religious/political corporal punishment in Europe as another example.

You ask why New World peoples did not domesticate the horse before their extinction ca. 12,000 ya. In all of human history, the earliest evidence of the domestication of the horse is found around 3000 BCE in the area that is today Kazakhstan. There are examples of Paleolithic cave art throughout Euraisia from ca. 30,000 BCE with images of wild horses being hunted by people. So why are you complaining that New World peoples were unable to domesticate the horse in 1500 years when it took humans 27,000 years (and probably far longer since people had been in Eurasia for longer than 30,000 years) to domesticate the horse. Furthermore, not all animals are domesticable -- why do you then automatically assume that the Pleistocene Horse was domesticable, especially since we know essentially nothing beyond its physical skeletal characteristics?

Mayan's were not the only New World peoples to develop a writing system -- it's now apparent that Andean peoples probably developed some form of written communication through the quipu system. Sadly, the Spanish burnt almost all of these out of a fear of rebellion and heresy so our understanding of these has been extremely slow since only a handful remain. Also, with the Mayan case, it turns out that people developed this system of writing extremely fast -- especially when you consider that people had been living in Europe (ie Britain and the Mediterranean since about 40,000 BCE, though somewhat intermittently in Britain) and in the Middle East for far longer. Furthermore, writing was an independent invention in the New World -- in the Old World, writing was something that diffused into neighbouring territories and was used as needed (or not) by those who lived in those areas, or was forced upon people through conquest.


#29 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
So your justification of your lack of empathy is basically "might makes right."
That's not psychopathic at all.
User avatar
#31 - megakillerx (06/10/2016) [-]
No, that's being realistic m8. Do you really think any empire or civilisation was built upon flowers, roses and pretty words to each other? The strongest civilisation paves forward while the weaker ones must keep up in order to survive. That's what European pagans did while converting to Christianity, that's what the Japanese did in the Victorian era, the Injuns and Africans didn't and they payed the price. That's the way of life.
#32 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
OK, so you believe in might is right. That's cool, just not very empathetic.
A civ based on flowers and pretty words sounds lovely. At least they wouldn't be destroying their environment.
User avatar
#33 - megakillerx (06/10/2016) [-]
Of course the White guilting anon is also a bloody hippie.You probably believe in the noble savage myth aswell.
#35 - anon (06/11/2016) [-]
White guilting? lmao what did I say to make you think that. Victim complex much? I'm literally only advocating for basic human empathy. Of course you don't have to feel guilt for something you didn't do. That normally goes without saying except when talking to faggots on this website.

Concern for the environment makes me a hippie? If the alternative is ruining the planet that I live on, resulting in my painful death, then sure. Proud hippie.
User avatar
#39 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
False sense of superiority much? You where the one crying about residential schools over a linked video taking a piss on pro immigration.

The Enviroment can be preserved without tearing down the fabrics of society and civilisation like a fucking hippie advocates for.
#40 - anon (06/11/2016) [-]
Hahaha "false sense of superiority" dude stop projecting your insecurities on everyone else, it's embarrassing. I was the one what? I'm anon, this is my first interaction with you. Are you autistic or something?
The "fabric of society" can be preserved without suspending all human empathy.
User avatar
#125 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
Yeah, keep dodging the discussion anon. Shows how intelligent and morally superior you are.
#34 - nightgazer (06/11/2016) [-]
So basically survival of the fittest,eh?

What do you think we are? Animals?
User avatar
#36 - megakillerx (06/11/2016) [-]
I don't believe that the natives dindu nuffin and that Europeans where baby eating monsters as portrayed by white guilting liberals in universities.
#38 - nightgazer (06/11/2016) [-]
You're replying to the wrong person Dude...

But yes,i agree with you in that regard,in my opinion,every side is in the wrong
User avatar
#23 - ciarancrashy (06/10/2016) [-]
In Ireland, we have travelers. Their essentially gypsies.
#489 - Did the top comment mime Literal cancer just roll quin…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/10/2016 on "delete your account" -2
#507 - anon (06/10/2016) [-]
Read the grey part: **topcommentmime used "**anonymous used "*roll 1, 99999-99999*"**
**anonymous rolls 99,999**"**
#506 - skyrimdovah (06/10/2016) [-]
look at the roll settings

User avatar
#509 - ciarancrashy (06/10/2016) [-]
My bad
#18 - You mean this?  [+] (2 new replies) 06/10/2016 on Shower +11
#20 - ainise (06/10/2016) [-]
I was just looking for this to post, Thanks for beating me to it. Fucking love these.
User avatar
#19 - virtigo (06/10/2016) [-]
Yes!
#2 - squirrel? 06/05/2016 on Ultimate relaxation +4
#26 - If you're a man and you're living in Europe, you may very well…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/05/2016 on Anon theory +4
User avatar
#84 - padrinobel (06/05/2016) [-]
Can't wait to die for something I believe in.
Plus fuck they EU, the only reason they're pushing a left agenda is because they need "stupid" workers. And they are perfect for the job.
We were like them during the Middle Ages, we believed in a great God, had tons of kids and worked for nothing for a boss (lord). Now we became moere educated and that's exactly what they don't want. Cheap and stupid labour is what they want.
I wish we could go back to the time where everyone knew everyone in the same town. Where neighbours helped other neighbours cause they knew eachother through family. "Hey you're the husband of my wife's niece, sure I'll help you".
Now nobody knows nobody.
Yet it's too late to go back to that time, we need to look forward hopefully some kind of change will come.
User avatar
#43 - shenro (06/05/2016) [-]
civil war maybe, but perhaps the goverment will pull their heads out of their asses when the vigilantee mobs become too common for their liking.
#57 - The White Rose society are a bunch of femicunts. The society a… 06/03/2016 on SJW hypocrisy +1