Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

chusmimax    

Rank #4867 on Comments
no avatar Level 158 Comments: Faptastic
Offline
Send mail to chusmimax Block chusmimax Invite chusmimax to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/01/2012
Last Login:7/28/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4867
Highest Content Rank:#17640
Highest Comment Rank:#4841
Content Thumbs: 20 total,  41 ,  21
Comment Thumbs: 662 total,  755 ,  93
Content Level Progress: 40.67% (24/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 158 Comments: Faptastic → Level 159 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Content Views:11955
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:239
FJ Points:604

latest user's comments

#2 - still funny, but really old 06/23/2014 on Cat trys to jump over baby... 0
#1 - pick it, you don't know when you will need it 06/23/2014 on Oh 0
#5 - Am i the only one who can recognise magic the gathering?  [+] (3 new replies) 06/23/2014 on Dark Souls +5
User avatar #7 - theblackflameky (06/23/2014) [-]
Surely you jest. It's most obviously jojos bizarre adventure.
#9 - anonymous (06/23/2014) [-]
wtf? this is attack on titan
User avatar #88 - glasstrampoline (06/27/2014) [-]
I could have sworn it was Sword Art Online
#35 - you all look exactly the same way smoothskins 06/22/2014 on Say no to racism +5
#30 - Comment deleted 06/21/2014 on the struggle 0
#4 - **chusmimax rolled image ** what the designer was thinking about 06/18/2014 on Genius +1
#66 - only game i took as a challenge and isn't meant "just to … 06/12/2014 on I know that feeling... +1
#64 - is that ukanlos? really? monster hunter is still alive? i have…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/12/2014 on I know that feeling... +1
User avatar #65 - psychodreadnought (06/12/2014) [-]
we need all the hunters we can get.
#66 - chusmimax (06/12/2014) [-]
only game i took as a challenge and isn't meant "just to be difficult". Here you have my aproval
#912 - Calling homosexuality a sexual fetish is the most superficial …  [+] (1 new reply) 04/16/2013 on co-existion is possible +1
User avatar #924 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
You have a point but I believe that's how it is for many homosexuals. It can overlap.
#901 - Your point has no sense. male and female are practically the s…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/16/2013 on co-existion is possible 0
User avatar #920 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
Your point has no sense. male and female are practically the same. all diferences come from todays society, not from our gens.
You are obviously a liberal to deny the existence of gender difference. Females are different from males, even today when females have entered the job market in full-force. For instance, females are the large plurality of consumerists (buy the most goods for themselves) and those who file divorce. Females are more emotional thinkers and not very independent minded in politics.

Men have less net-worth on average while females have larger net-worth. These are not abstract statistics but insights into how the male/female bond works. Men are still expected to follow old-marriage rules (pay the bill, support the wife by giving her money thus lowering his net-worth, etc.) while the female has changed radically from that era and now has a higher-net worth.

Gender exists in Science, too. I hope you don't deny that.

I know a load of cases in which the woman benefit in divorcing was 0, but it is very simple to remark the wrong cases out of the total ones
Something like 90% of divorces are won by women at the man's expense.
#880 - it's a good opinion, but are they really able to choice when t…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/16/2013 on co-existion is possible 0
User avatar #903 - Vandeekree (04/16/2013) [-]
I'm not saying anyone is trying to make anyone else gay. But the gay rights movement really has nothing to do with rights. It's not about them wanting to be treated equal, being treated like a person, not threatened, not murdered, all of that is already an established right. But what is being pushed for a sexual revolution where what is sexually accepted is changed. They're not wanting us to be gay, they want us to change our opinion and admit to them that being gay is somehow ok when it's simply not.
They choose not to have a normal life and then demand everyone else tell them that they're normal.
#873 - Why? As far as i know some homosexual couples are together unt…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/16/2013 on co-existion is possible 0
User avatar #895 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
Homosexuality, remember, is a sexual fetish. "Couples" under this group usually are just sexual units which will break apart more frequently than heterosexual units in search for new mates. Why? Heterosexual units conceive or care for children more often than homosexuals, which tie them together.
#912 - chusmimax (04/16/2013) [-]
Calling homosexuality a sexual fetish is the most superficial thing that i have heard in months. it is not, it is most of times a hormone disorder, so is really like a person traped in the wrong body. people with those fethishes are not really afected by they marriage law, because as it is a fetish, they don't really want to live with the other person for ever (there are always exceptions)
User avatar #924 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
You have a point but I believe that's how it is for many homosexuals. It can overlap.
User avatar #883 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
New-era marriage has not adapted to the man. Ever since the 1960s, marriage has worked in favor of the feminists who were the only people lobbying to change the entire institution.

I do not think marriage is even possible anymore. How would one make marriage work; balancing out the benefits/cons of the male and female like it once was?

Bottom line: Your girlfriend, when married, can divorce you, fuck you over financially, take the children, and make you commit suicide. This happens, in many extents, severe or not, all the time.
#901 - chusmimax (04/16/2013) [-]
Your point has no sense. male and female are practically the same. all diferences come from todays society, not from our gens. so there is nothing to balance as it is already balanced. Furthermore, what you are saying about my girlfriend has no sense either. I know a load of cases in which the woman benefit in divorcing was 0, but it is very simple to remark the wrong cases out of the total ones
User avatar #920 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
Your point has no sense. male and female are practically the same. all diferences come from todays society, not from our gens.
You are obviously a liberal to deny the existence of gender difference. Females are different from males, even today when females have entered the job market in full-force. For instance, females are the large plurality of consumerists (buy the most goods for themselves) and those who file divorce. Females are more emotional thinkers and not very independent minded in politics.

Men have less net-worth on average while females have larger net-worth. These are not abstract statistics but insights into how the male/female bond works. Men are still expected to follow old-marriage rules (pay the bill, support the wife by giving her money thus lowering his net-worth, etc.) while the female has changed radically from that era and now has a higher-net worth.

Gender exists in Science, too. I hope you don't deny that.

I know a load of cases in which the woman benefit in divorcing was 0, but it is very simple to remark the wrong cases out of the total ones
Something like 90% of divorces are won by women at the man's expense.
#843 - Not natural? marriage is not natural, homosexuality is. I have…  [+] (8 new replies) 04/16/2013 on co-existion is possible 0
User avatar #864 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
And marriage is incompatible with homosexuality. At least what marriage used to be.

You liberals screwed up marriage so much since the 60s that it would make no difference if fags could marry. Marriage used to mean, united until death.
#873 - chusmimax (04/16/2013) [-]
Why? As far as i know some homosexual couples are together until death. I'm liberal and i will with my recent girlfriend. But, do you mean that if I make my wife feel that her life is useless and that she is nothing compared to me she do not have the possibility (and even obligation) to make a new life far away from me?
User avatar #895 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
Homosexuality, remember, is a sexual fetish. "Couples" under this group usually are just sexual units which will break apart more frequently than heterosexual units in search for new mates. Why? Heterosexual units conceive or care for children more often than homosexuals, which tie them together.
#912 - chusmimax (04/16/2013) [-]
Calling homosexuality a sexual fetish is the most superficial thing that i have heard in months. it is not, it is most of times a hormone disorder, so is really like a person traped in the wrong body. people with those fethishes are not really afected by they marriage law, because as it is a fetish, they don't really want to live with the other person for ever (there are always exceptions)
User avatar #924 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
You have a point but I believe that's how it is for many homosexuals. It can overlap.
User avatar #883 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
New-era marriage has not adapted to the man. Ever since the 1960s, marriage has worked in favor of the feminists who were the only people lobbying to change the entire institution.

I do not think marriage is even possible anymore. How would one make marriage work; balancing out the benefits/cons of the male and female like it once was?

Bottom line: Your girlfriend, when married, can divorce you, fuck you over financially, take the children, and make you commit suicide. This happens, in many extents, severe or not, all the time.
#901 - chusmimax (04/16/2013) [-]
Your point has no sense. male and female are practically the same. all diferences come from todays society, not from our gens. so there is nothing to balance as it is already balanced. Furthermore, what you are saying about my girlfriend has no sense either. I know a load of cases in which the woman benefit in divorcing was 0, but it is very simple to remark the wrong cases out of the total ones
User avatar #920 - byposted (04/16/2013) [-]
Your point has no sense. male and female are practically the same. all diferences come from todays society, not from our gens.
You are obviously a liberal to deny the existence of gender difference. Females are different from males, even today when females have entered the job market in full-force. For instance, females are the large plurality of consumerists (buy the most goods for themselves) and those who file divorce. Females are more emotional thinkers and not very independent minded in politics.

Men have less net-worth on average while females have larger net-worth. These are not abstract statistics but insights into how the male/female bond works. Men are still expected to follow old-marriage rules (pay the bill, support the wife by giving her money thus lowering his net-worth, etc.) while the female has changed radically from that era and now has a higher-net worth.

Gender exists in Science, too. I hope you don't deny that.

I know a load of cases in which the woman benefit in divorcing was 0, but it is very simple to remark the wrong cases out of the total ones
Something like 90% of divorces are won by women at the man's expense.
#839 - Homosexuality is natural among a lot of species and marriage i…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/16/2013 on co-existion is possible 0
User avatar #854 - Vandeekree (04/16/2013) [-]
I never said i don't contend divorce as well. It's also wrong but I neither go protest at divorced peoples doors nor do i do it at gay couple's doors. I support their right to have sex with anyone they want even if it's a sin, but I would not want to see sinful acts added into the nation's law either(anymore than it already is sense divorce already is in the law) I think it should be neither banned nor supported, leaving it as simply a choice.
#880 - chusmimax (04/16/2013) [-]
it's a good opinion, but are they really able to choice when they can't get married and form a normal family? It's not about making pro gay campains traying to make straight homos, it's just to allow those people who has no choice to have a normal life.
User avatar #903 - Vandeekree (04/16/2013) [-]
I'm not saying anyone is trying to make anyone else gay. But the gay rights movement really has nothing to do with rights. It's not about them wanting to be treated equal, being treated like a person, not threatened, not murdered, all of that is already an established right. But what is being pushed for a sexual revolution where what is sexually accepted is changed. They're not wanting us to be gay, they want us to change our opinion and admit to them that being gay is somehow ok when it's simply not.
They choose not to have a normal life and then demand everyone else tell them that they're normal.
#58 - It means nothing, really, it has no sense in binary  [+] (1 new reply) 04/11/2013 on I don't know what I expected. +1
User avatar #76 - mythichyphen (04/11/2013) [-]
I translated it to this: OP is a f]�½Ð.
#48 - **chusmimax rolled a random comment #213 posted by avatars… 04/11/2013 on Set Your Alarm 0
#3 - I think it is harder to escape from a blackhole  [+] (2 new replies) 04/09/2013 on yeah, i think so too 0
#33 - midgetbagel (04/10/2013) [-]
yo mammas black hole

i'm so sorry
User avatar #19 - dreaddune (04/10/2013) [-]
I think it's harder to escape elohell.

Yes, i used a lol-reference, but i fell that i had to keep the original theme of that Einstein picture.
#3 - Picture 04/09/2013 on iWTF 0
#2 - It's a trap 04/09/2013 on Eternal Dragon Arise 0
#72 - **chusmimax rolled a random image posted in comment #3491268… 04/09/2013 on Faith in humanity -1
#17 - **chusmimax rolled a random image posted in comment #88 at … 04/08/2013 on *Roll Picture* +1
#1 - **chusmimax rolled a random image posted in comment #15 at … 04/08/2013 on jeebus 0
#2 - **chusmimax rolled a random image posted in comment #3947981… 04/08/2013 on You will not be... 0
#9 - **chusmimax rolls 8,211** 04/08/2013 on OH LAWD 0
#1 - Comment deleted 04/08/2013 on THATCHERS DEAD!!! -2
[ 239 Total ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - koalasaurus (06/24/2014) [-]
well this wasa huge failure
here's your koala anyway
#4 to #1 - chusmimax (06/24/2014) [-]
i have no words to thank you
 Friends (0)