x
FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand

cheezbrgr

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:9/09/2010
Last Login:3/06/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#35553
Highest Comment Rank:#5874
Comment Thumbs: 528 total,  844 ,  316
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 142 Comments: Faptastic → Level 143 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:197
FJ Points:409

latest user's comments

#59 - Just cause you dont agree with something doesn't mean it's wro…  [+] (5 new replies) 03/04/2015 on Serves her right -3
User avatar #79 - makotoitou (03/04/2015) [-]
It also taught you to be a jackass.
User avatar #74 - thevaulthunter (03/04/2015) [-]
You're a grown ass man insulting children's parents' method of raising their kids on a website made for laughing.
Yeah, turned out great.
User avatar #69 - hashtronaut (03/04/2015) [-]
it's wrong
#66 - namenotallowed (03/04/2015) [-]
And just because you don't agree with the majority on here doesn't make you right either, so what's your point?
You can be grateful while also having privacy if you are unable to understand that then your brain is defective. A family can be built on mutual respect believe it or not.
#65 - anonexplains (03/04/2015) [-]
if you turned out fine why are you on funnyjunk?
#54 - Reading the comments just shows how entitled you little …  [+] (17 new replies) 03/04/2015 on Serves her right -40
User avatar #124 - hwangnuneo (03/04/2015) [-]
The hell are people thumbing you down for...I agree with you.
User avatar #113 - Shiny (03/04/2015) [-]
Psst: a sense of privacy and self is necessary for kids to develop into functioning adults. There's a difference between disciplining your child and dehumanizing them.
User avatar #112 - sinonyx (03/04/2015) [-]
"listen here you little shit, you're not allowed any form of privacy, we own you"

sorry your parents were assholes
User avatar #107 - lordmoldywart (03/04/2015) [-]
"PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL" means it's private and fucking confidential. It seems as though you were treated as property by your parents. Sorry for your poor upbringing.
User avatar #101 - Marker (03/04/2015) [-]
>>#88, >>#79, >>#57,
same here. to my knowledge my parents didn't go snooping in my room, but they too made it very fucking clear that they owned the house. "Your room" isn't 100% yours unless you are paying rent, taxes, and/or mortgage.

Respecting privacy goes a long way to a good relationship among family members, but in a case like this it is technically (and legally) a matter of choice.
#88 - anonexplains (03/04/2015) [-]
So you had a shitty childhood and parents and that is our problem because you were raised with people that didn't respect privacy and saw you as less then a human being?
#78 - anonexplains (03/04/2015) [-]
Well I didn't get a choice to decide whether I wanted to live or not. They could at least allow me to keep my room dirty.
User avatar #76 - stonetomcat (03/04/2015) [-]
>Just move out
Because any 11 year old can just move out any time they want, right?
#58 - anonexplains (03/04/2015) [-]
I can agree with what you're saying but if your kids got a a box/safe/envelope of their own personal stuff then that's theirs.
User avatar #103 - Marker (03/04/2015) [-]
if it says "PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL" it's probably a trick
User avatar #57 - shadowbreech (03/04/2015) [-]
I'm sorry to hear you had such shit parents because that's wrong.
User avatar #59 - cheezbrgr (03/04/2015) [-]
Just cause you dont agree with something doesn't mean it's wrong. And I figure i turned out just fine. It taught me to be grateful and to understand that you shouldn't make demands of people who you rely on.
User avatar #79 - makotoitou (03/04/2015) [-]
It also taught you to be a jackass.
User avatar #74 - thevaulthunter (03/04/2015) [-]
You're a grown ass man insulting children's parents' method of raising their kids on a website made for laughing.
Yeah, turned out great.
User avatar #69 - hashtronaut (03/04/2015) [-]
it's wrong
#66 - namenotallowed (03/04/2015) [-]
And just because you don't agree with the majority on here doesn't make you right either, so what's your point?
You can be grateful while also having privacy if you are unable to understand that then your brain is defective. A family can be built on mutual respect believe it or not.
#65 - anonexplains (03/04/2015) [-]
if you turned out fine why are you on funnyjunk?
#6 - I always picked luigi because I was the younger brother so I a… 02/28/2015 on Mario Kart Character Selection +1
#37 - Ah yes. Vietnam. The war that left a country in ruins, a lands… 02/27/2015 on (untitled) 0
#12 - I turned 23 today. Goddamn I feel old. 02/25/2015 on (untitled) 0
#69 - Happy birthday. Thats funny mine is tomorrow. Turning 23 as well. 02/24/2015 on Happy Birthday to me. 0
#15 - Not in america. 02/20/2015 on Oh, France! +1
#133 - More is definitely better for the current role of our navy. Wh…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/18/2015 on rekt +1
User avatar #181 - aingoia (02/18/2015) [-]
They sure are spending hella money to just project American influence [url deleted] Mind citing your sources? From the quote of Robert Gates, it sounds like the role of the US Navy is in fact combat, it's just that nobody thinks that fighting us head on is a good idea.
#82 - I never said it was weaker. Our navy is tremendously powerful …  [+] (3 new replies) 02/17/2015 on rekt +1
#122 - angelusprimus (02/18/2015) [-]
Navy doesn't WANT more ships. Navy wants large, high tech ships that can project massive amounts of force while being minimally vulnerable to enemy action.
More is not always better.
User avatar #133 - cheezbrgr (02/18/2015) [-]
More is definitely better for the current role of our navy. Which is not very combat oriented. That being said, the comment by the president insinuated that the navy is obsolete. Which it is clearly not.
User avatar #181 - aingoia (02/18/2015) [-]
They sure are spending hella money to just project American influence [url deleted] Mind citing your sources? From the quote of Robert Gates, it sounds like the role of the US Navy is in fact combat, it's just that nobody thinks that fighting us head on is a good idea.
#64 - Our navy also had a much smaller role in the world back then. …  [+] (10 new replies) 02/17/2015 on rekt 0
#76 - angelusprimus (02/17/2015) [-]
Only way you can say that navy is smaller is if you count the number of ships.
So yes, that's true.
On the other hand tonnage of our ships today is over three and half time larger.
Why? Because in 1917 we had battleships and now we have nuclear aircraft carriers. Majority of the ships we had then were about the size of a today's gunboat. And today's gunboat could take on a 1917 battleship and sink it without a problem because now we have guided missiles, and then we had large gunpowder canons.
If we also look at it in the amount of projected firepower, single carrier battlegroup would be not just equal to entire 1917 fleet, but ALL the fleets in 1917 in the world put together.
Actually until chinese make their supercarrier operational a full sized carrier group with a submarine escort is equal to pretty much any navy today. And we have 10.

So anyone who thinks our navy is weaker than it was in 1917 is a complete idiot.
User avatar #83 - truesmokewolf (02/17/2015) [-]
Nobody ever said weaker. He said smaller. North Korea has more submarines than we do. Though our Navy was never our militaristic claim to fame.
User avatar #216 - themanwithnoplan (02/18/2015) [-]
It can be argued that our Navy is what first made us a World Power, since we had such a crushing victory over Spain in the Spanish-American War. Even though Spain was basically operating on sticks and bubblegum at the time, we lost 1 guy at Havana Bay but destroyed Spain's entire navy in the Caribbean.

And don't forget the Great White Fleet. We had the second largest navy in the world and we took a world tour in 1907 just to flaunt it off (See: Gunboat Diplomacy)
User avatar #221 - truesmokewolf (02/18/2015) [-]
Yes, but our position as a modern world superpower is mainly decided by our vastly superior air force.
User avatar #223 - themanwithnoplan (02/18/2015) [-]
Yes, but you said our Navy had never been a claim to fame, which was basically the purpose of the Great White Fleet to rest of the world.
User avatar #225 - truesmokewolf (02/18/2015) [-]
Okay, you're right. At one point, it was our claim to fame.
User avatar #82 - cheezbrgr (02/17/2015) [-]
I never said it was weaker. Our navy is tremendously powerful by any standards. But when do you think we are gonna be having naval battles. Our modern navy is more about projecting American influence across the world. Providing humanitarian assistance and patrolling trouble areas like the middle east. It would be easier to accomplish this with more ships rather than bigger ships.
#122 - angelusprimus (02/18/2015) [-]
Navy doesn't WANT more ships. Navy wants large, high tech ships that can project massive amounts of force while being minimally vulnerable to enemy action.
More is not always better.
User avatar #133 - cheezbrgr (02/18/2015) [-]
More is definitely better for the current role of our navy. Which is not very combat oriented. That being said, the comment by the president insinuated that the navy is obsolete. Which it is clearly not.
User avatar #181 - aingoia (02/18/2015) [-]
They sure are spending hella money to just project American influence [url deleted] Mind citing your sources? From the quote of Robert Gates, it sounds like the role of the US Navy is in fact combat, it's just that nobody thinks that fighting us head on is a good idea.
[ 194 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 850

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)