Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

checks    

checks Avatar Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to checks Block checks Invite checks to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 34
Date Signed Up:8/03/2009
Last Login:7/02/2012
Location:poop
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 1911 total,  2439 ,  528
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 11% (11/100)
Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:677
FJ Points:1170

latest user's comments

#63 - Picture 07/03/2011 on those cookies were amazing +2
#80 - so making a meme has actually BECOME A MEME itself! that makes… 07/03/2011 on oblivious nerd meme oc 0
#845 - Comment deleted 07/03/2011 on OP Delivers Minecraft... 0
#841 - Comment deleted 07/03/2011 on OP Delivers Minecraft... 0
#835 - **checks rolls 98** build a working computer using red stone. 07/03/2011 on OP Delivers Minecraft... 0
#48 - next time i get head.... 07/02/2011 on Banned Pop Rocks Commercial +2
#20 - i got a comment about eating babies that got 140 thumb s, i d… 07/02/2011 on forever alone +1
#184 - you know what really grinds my gears?.... 07/02/2011 on Things That Piss me off to... +2
#177 - my boyfriend said not to, it would tickle his nuts.  [+] (9 new replies) 07/02/2011 on Beard Advice COMIC +56
#207 - awesomeguitar has deleted their comment.
#197 - greywulf has deleted their comment.
#209 - jcubdabeast has deleted their comment.
#188 - chawlsBITCH (07/02/2011) [-]
User avatar #183 - ianclimber (07/02/2011) [-]
says op
#184 - ianclimber has deleted their comment.
#193 - webfeet (07/02/2011) [-]
kinda gettin old
User avatar #195 - ianclimber (07/02/2011) [-]
sorry just found it cute/funny il delete it
#178 - corruptedman has deleted their comment.
#313 - i like how Einstein, Hawking, King, Gandhi, C.S. Lewis, Rowlin… 07/02/2011 on Stuff that made me lol 2. +6
#1535 - no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while hi…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/02/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#71 - Comment deleted 07/01/2011 on Just some statistics 0
#64 - Comment deleted 07/01/2011 on Just some statistics 0
#60 - Comment deleted 07/01/2011 on Life +33
#571 - **checks rolls 484** 07/01/2011 on Motivationals Part 3 0
#117 - ******* !!!! 07/01/2011 on Anoter Stupid Blonde 0
#1522 - what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/01/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#1517 - look it up in a dictionary. -first definition from merriam-web…  [+] (7 new replies) 07/01/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1521 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
>recites what I just said
>Proclaims victory

Yeah, cool
User avatar #1522 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the argument "what is art?" aesthetics vs. skill and imagination. what i said is in no way similar to what you said.
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#1383 - art is expression, art is a science, art is hard work and pass…  [+] (9 new replies) 06/30/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1393 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Art - the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

tl;dr, if you think making a piss drawing in the snow is aesthetically pleasing - it's art.
User avatar #1517 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
look it up in a dictionary. -first definition from merriam-webster

1. The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power.

2.Works produced by such skill and imagination

thanks for playing.


User avatar #1521 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
>recites what I just said
>Proclaims victory

Yeah, cool
User avatar #1522 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the argument "what is art?" aesthetics vs. skill and imagination. what i said is in no way similar to what you said.
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#112 - Comment deleted 06/30/2011 on Warm Beer +9
#1374 - by your logic i could scream into a microphone with no musical…  [+] (11 new replies) 06/30/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1379 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
You won't be good (although you might), but you will still be making art.

What you will be doing could range from artistic reading, to poetry, to music.

Art is the creation of something to aesthetically please yourself and/or others.
User avatar #1383 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
art is expression, art is a science, art is hard work and passion, art is something that DOES NOT come easy.
User avatar #1393 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Art - the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

tl;dr, if you think making a piss drawing in the snow is aesthetically pleasing - it's art.
User avatar #1517 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
look it up in a dictionary. -first definition from merriam-webster

1. The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power.

2.Works produced by such skill and imagination

thanks for playing.


User avatar #1521 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
>recites what I just said
>Proclaims victory

Yeah, cool
User avatar #1522 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the argument "what is art?" aesthetics vs. skill and imagination. what i said is in no way similar to what you said.
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#1347 - i believe the word youre looking for is misconception, fallacy…  [+] (13 new replies) 06/30/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1368 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
No, for my first 2 replies fallacy is the perfect word, however for the third you may be right.

What?
My arguments directly refute yours.

Your argument: Rap isn't music, because X and Y
My reply: X and Y are not definitions of music

Your argument: Music requires musicians
My reply: Rappers are musicians

Your argument: They're are not musicians because Z and W
My reply: Z and W do not define a musician.
User avatar #1374 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
by your logic i could scream into a microphone with no musical intent and call myself a vocalist. where is the art?
User avatar #1379 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
You won't be good (although you might), but you will still be making art.

What you will be doing could range from artistic reading, to poetry, to music.

Art is the creation of something to aesthetically please yourself and/or others.
User avatar #1383 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
art is expression, art is a science, art is hard work and passion, art is something that DOES NOT come easy.
User avatar #1393 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Art - the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

tl;dr, if you think making a piss drawing in the snow is aesthetically pleasing - it's art.
User avatar #1517 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
look it up in a dictionary. -first definition from merriam-webster

1. The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power.

2.Works produced by such skill and imagination

thanks for playing.


User avatar #1521 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
>recites what I just said
>Proclaims victory

Yeah, cool
User avatar #1522 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the argument "what is art?" aesthetics vs. skill and imagination. what i said is in no way similar to what you said.
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#1249 - under no circumstances are they musicians. a musician is an ar…  [+] (15 new replies) 06/30/2011 on Queen is better 0
User avatar #1253 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Another fallacy
Dude, seriously...

A musician is a person who writes, performs, or makes music. Musicians can be classified by their roles in creating or performing music.

One of the types of musicians are vocalists.

Rappers are vocalists.
User avatar #1347 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
i believe the word youre looking for is misconception, fallacy means inherant flaw. and i profoundly disagree with you, your arguments fail to refute mine, and therefore we are are arguing a null point.
User avatar #1368 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
No, for my first 2 replies fallacy is the perfect word, however for the third you may be right.

What?
My arguments directly refute yours.

Your argument: Rap isn't music, because X and Y
My reply: X and Y are not definitions of music

Your argument: Music requires musicians
My reply: Rappers are musicians

Your argument: They're are not musicians because Z and W
My reply: Z and W do not define a musician.
User avatar #1374 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
by your logic i could scream into a microphone with no musical intent and call myself a vocalist. where is the art?
User avatar #1379 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
You won't be good (although you might), but you will still be making art.

What you will be doing could range from artistic reading, to poetry, to music.

Art is the creation of something to aesthetically please yourself and/or others.
User avatar #1383 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
art is expression, art is a science, art is hard work and passion, art is something that DOES NOT come easy.
User avatar #1393 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Art - the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

tl;dr, if you think making a piss drawing in the snow is aesthetically pleasing - it's art.
User avatar #1517 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
look it up in a dictionary. -first definition from merriam-webster

1. The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power.

2.Works produced by such skill and imagination

thanks for playing.


User avatar #1521 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
>recites what I just said
>Proclaims victory

Yeah, cool
User avatar #1522 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the argument "what is art?" aesthetics vs. skill and imagination. what i said is in no way similar to what you said.
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#1222 - music requires musicians. check and mate.  [+] (17 new replies) 06/30/2011 on Queen is better -3
User avatar #1229 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Rappers are musicians
Check and mate


That was fallacy of false cause I believe.
User avatar #1249 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
under no circumstances are they musicians. a musician is an artist, and artist has something to contribute to the world, not just talk about how their undeserved wealth. i can understand certain pop singers, but the majority of mainstream rap?
no. absolutely not.
User avatar #1253 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Another fallacy
Dude, seriously...

A musician is a person who writes, performs, or makes music. Musicians can be classified by their roles in creating or performing music.

One of the types of musicians are vocalists.

Rappers are vocalists.
User avatar #1347 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
i believe the word youre looking for is misconception, fallacy means inherant flaw. and i profoundly disagree with you, your arguments fail to refute mine, and therefore we are are arguing a null point.
User avatar #1368 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
No, for my first 2 replies fallacy is the perfect word, however for the third you may be right.

What?
My arguments directly refute yours.

Your argument: Rap isn't music, because X and Y
My reply: X and Y are not definitions of music

Your argument: Music requires musicians
My reply: Rappers are musicians

Your argument: They're are not musicians because Z and W
My reply: Z and W do not define a musician.
User avatar #1374 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
by your logic i could scream into a microphone with no musical intent and call myself a vocalist. where is the art?
User avatar #1379 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
You won't be good (although you might), but you will still be making art.

What you will be doing could range from artistic reading, to poetry, to music.

Art is the creation of something to aesthetically please yourself and/or others.
User avatar #1383 - checks (06/30/2011) [-]
art is expression, art is a science, art is hard work and passion, art is something that DOES NOT come easy.
User avatar #1393 - gamnq (06/30/2011) [-]
Art - the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

tl;dr, if you think making a piss drawing in the snow is aesthetically pleasing - it's art.
User avatar #1517 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
look it up in a dictionary. -first definition from merriam-webster

1. The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power.

2.Works produced by such skill and imagination

thanks for playing.


User avatar #1521 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
>recites what I just said
>Proclaims victory

Yeah, cool
User avatar #1522 - checks (07/01/2011) [-]
what? youre delusional. those were both different sides to the argument "what is art?" aesthetics vs. skill and imagination. what i said is in no way similar to what you said.
User avatar #1531 - gamnq (07/01/2011) [-]
"appreciated primarily for their beauty and emotional power."

Isn't that aesthetics though?
User avatar #1535 - checks (07/02/2011) [-]
no. aesthetics would be something like slash's tophat while his art would be the music.
User avatar #1540 - gamnq (07/03/2011) [-]
Aethetics - a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty

Art is aesthetics, or rather a part of it.
User avatar #1541 - checks (07/04/2011) [-]
that is an unsatisfactory definition and therefore argument. i dont plan on continuing this.
User avatar #1543 - gamnq (07/04/2011) [-]
Well since you're finished, let's sum up our stuff.

I say that rap is art and also that anything that is aesthetically pleasing to the creator and/or other people is also art. Unless built with another specific purpose
EG: I think a ship of the line looks really beautiful, but none of it was intended to be beautiful, it's only a side effect of it being a powerful weapon.

You say that rap is not art, because most of it isn't created with the use of artistic talent(s).


Here's why I think I'm right: my system of classifying art encompasses all things created by man to be aesthetically pleasing After that we make the distinction of "high" art and "low" art, with "high" being fine tuned and generally hard to make (needs use of artistic talent, vocal/drawing/architectural skill). While "low" art would not require any sort of talent or skill to create, thus resulting, most of the time, in the low quality of the final product.

The system you propose works with talents and skills ONLY, while most skills are measurable to a degree, talents are not. This results in a classification by opinion. EG: I really like Van Gogh's paintings, they are art. I really hate Picasso's paintings, they are not art. Then, I could use a ridiculously huge amount of accusations to "prove" myself right, I could state that Picasso has no talent, and NOBODY would be able to prove me wrong. Because everyone has his own opinion on what falls into "talent" and what falls into "skill"

Your system works from opinions and thus are flawed from the start.
My system works with facts, and THEN applies public opinion to classify the arts within the broad term "art"
#342 - wanna know the true acronym for B.I.L.F.?  [+] (2 new replies) 06/30/2011 on One Man's Best Friend +6
#359 - JohnnyRenegade (06/30/2011) [-]
#351 - xhaworthx (06/30/2011) [-]
no. get a life you sick fuck.

Comments(0):

 
Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
No comments!
 Friends (0)