Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #7558 on Subscribers
Level 260 Comments: Pure Win
Send mail to charredenay
Invite charredenay to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 140 Content: Faptastic → Level 141 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress:
Level 260 Comments: Pure Win → Level 261 Comments: Pure Win
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
steven universe (3)
judy hopps (2)
nick wilde (2)
What people say about charredenay
latest user's comments
- "Male Lead"
- You know, I wasn't even going to down-vote you. I just wanted …
22 Hop Street
**nootz used "*roll picture*"**
- God damn it, I got halfway through this before I remembered it.
4chan in a nutshell
- I hate your titles.
Xems Sigen Zofemey Giedr
Why is admin to blame
it's a randomised title
admin put in some code which makes these weird titles instead of naming contents "(untitled)" like it used to
Why not just name is something related to the content? It takes 2 seconds at most
agreed, but people are lazy
what I meant is that admin is the one who made it be these titles instead of (untitled)
Why not just a space or an underscore (shift+hyphen or _)? That why it would show up as untitled but technically not be blank.
...I know what an underscore is?
but, multiple reasons
for one, it's confusing to look at. Though maybe less so than the randomised titles
also, it's confusing for computers to deal with
I think the main reason addy did this new title thing, is so untitled contents can still be catalogued as different, for whatever purpose that may serve
in a way, they're now more unique than normal contents, which you notice relatively frequently can share titles. I see one right now on the front page simply called "Badass", a title I have no doubt has probably been used before
just, please. Guys.
I do know what I'm talking about, I literally work for the website
- Yeah, but that just gives them some wiggle room for the sequel…
- Explaining the joke only serves to ruin it for everyone who un…
22 Hop Street
You know, I wasn't even going to down-vote you. I just wanted to help you understand comedy better, but it is now clear that your greatest dream is to be the biggest anus that ever was. Congrats, you're well on your way to that goal.
- Then you have my full support!
- He mentioned how it "could've" been cringey because …
i just do not see why he had to mention cringe.
instead of saying "it could have shit, so close too but it was good" could he have not said,
"it was good"...
meh my main issue is how cancerous cringe culture is really.
I just found it to be the right adjective. I agree that its a term used too often but I thought in this case it was as accurate as I could get
fair enough mate.
i am not mad at you just at that word and the culture behind it.
Yeah I understand. And I agree with you that the culture is shit. Its like how cuck became a word for wuss or pussy. And the people who use it as "something I dont like" are idiots.
all these words, cuck, cringe, cancer,
it reminds me of when a 12 year old comes to school with a new word and uses it in god damn
everything because they think they are so cool.
- Except the lava drool, I'd call that a step too far.
second Gem OC's
Show Comments (12)