Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

cedrock    

Rank #9327 on Subscribers
cedrock Avatar Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to cedrock Block cedrock Invite cedrock to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 19
Steam Profile: http://steamcommunity.com/id/ACactus/
Video Games Played: DayZ, CS:GO, Dota 2
Interests: Big butts and I cannot lie
Date Signed Up:9/26/2011
Last Login:7/30/2014
Location:Lebanon
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 9095 total,  10362 ,  1267
Comment Thumbs: 2520 total,  3956 ,  1436
Content Level Progress: 93% (93/100)
Level 190 Content: Anon Annihilator → Level 191 Content: Anon Annihilator
Comment Level Progress: 50% (50/100)
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:7
Content Views:443012
Times Content Favorited:244 times
Total Comments Made:2628
FJ Points:11579
Favorite Tags: the (4) | game (3) | skyrim (3) | meme (2) | niggers (2) | tags (2)
Literally shit.

latest user's comments

#29307 - You can't be seriously this stupid... "I'ma get a mor…  [+] (10 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29308 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait so I give you Fifa and you give me Wikipedia? HAHAHA you're a funny guy. I should have know you were a joke joking this whole time, you're good fun, see you at the next obvious thing you got wrong.

Also if you knew your stuff, you could have argued "Carlos Bacca had lost control of the ball and David Luiz was going to get it therefore it was only a yellow" While I don't agree with that it is still a good debate and should really be cleared up. Your argument, however, was not
User avatar #29309 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You gave me something from 2004. I gave you an up to date, more explained version of the infringement and you deny it....You're pathetic. Literally too stupid to argue with.
User avatar #29311 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf
Also that PDF is from FIFA for the 2014/2015 season page 39 proves how stupid you really are
#29310 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Also Here is a more updated Fifa Version written in 2012, Apart from handling the ball, where is the keeper exempt
have a nice day now
User avatar #29313 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Literally proving me right, thanks.
User avatar #29314 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Go on then lets hear your explanation
User avatar #29315 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The same as above, you just think twice when reading my arguments can you?
User avatar #29316 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Remind me honey, I fear I may have forgotten
I haven't really forgotten I just think you told a good joke and I want to hear it again
User avatar #29317 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>Clearly win an argument
>Haha nice joke

Are you even trying? 0/10 not even impressed.
#29318 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Ok I'll remind you, You said the Goalkeeper get the advantage when it come to fouls in the box, where in the Print Screen and the link does it say "Except for the Goalkeeper he has the advantage" Except for handling the ball in the area
Also that line "the colombian stood on Cezer" one made me laugh
10/10 would come to you if I ever wanted to feel better about myself
Also his name is César
#29305 - >a serious offence such as violent conduct or an illegal an…  [+] (12 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29306 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Oops did I just pull up the Fifa Rules
User avatar #29307 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You can't be seriously this stupid...
"I'ma get a more brief explanation of the red card because it expresses my point"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_card

Go read the wiki you dipshit...It's more up to day and more explanatory.

TFW a picture from 2004....
User avatar #29308 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait so I give you Fifa and you give me Wikipedia? HAHAHA you're a funny guy. I should have know you were a joke joking this whole time, you're good fun, see you at the next obvious thing you got wrong.

Also if you knew your stuff, you could have argued "Carlos Bacca had lost control of the ball and David Luiz was going to get it therefore it was only a yellow" While I don't agree with that it is still a good debate and should really be cleared up. Your argument, however, was not
User avatar #29309 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You gave me something from 2004. I gave you an up to date, more explained version of the infringement and you deny it....You're pathetic. Literally too stupid to argue with.
User avatar #29311 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf
Also that PDF is from FIFA for the 2014/2015 season page 39 proves how stupid you really are
#29310 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Also Here is a more updated Fifa Version written in 2012, Apart from handling the ball, where is the keeper exempt
have a nice day now
User avatar #29313 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Literally proving me right, thanks.
User avatar #29314 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Go on then lets hear your explanation
User avatar #29315 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The same as above, you just think twice when reading my arguments can you?
User avatar #29316 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Remind me honey, I fear I may have forgotten
I haven't really forgotten I just think you told a good joke and I want to hear it again
User avatar #29317 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>Clearly win an argument
>Haha nice joke

Are you even trying? 0/10 not even impressed.
#29318 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Ok I'll remind you, You said the Goalkeeper get the advantage when it come to fouls in the box, where in the Print Screen and the link does it say "Except for the Goalkeeper he has the advantage" Except for handling the ball in the area
Also that line "the colombian stood on Cezer" one made me laugh
10/10 would come to you if I ever wanted to feel better about myself
Also his name is César
#29303 - The keeper was so calm in the encounter. He was literally just…  [+] (14 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29304 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Again, no one has ever done that before, stop your arguing play an actual game and learn the rules, you're talking to someone who used to play in goal at one point, I knew my boundaries.
I didn't Know Brazil consisted of just Neymar
User avatar #29305 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>a serious offence such as violent conduct or an illegal and purposeful obstruction of a goal scoring opportunity for the opposing team.

Do you even understand English? I know you can't type it but you can't even understand it?

PURPOSEFUL OBSTRUCTION, a foul that was made to purposefully obstruct the player. Julio Cezar was aiming for the ball, but the columbia outplayed Julio so that he could get a foul.

If people followed your rule, the game would be left with goalkeeper vs goalkeeper, because everyone has been sent off.

I used to play with a bunch of guys that were literally selected to go to madrid to try out for the Real Madrid team...
#29306 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Oops did I just pull up the Fifa Rules
User avatar #29307 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You can't be seriously this stupid...
"I'ma get a more brief explanation of the red card because it expresses my point"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_card

Go read the wiki you dipshit...It's more up to day and more explanatory.

TFW a picture from 2004....
User avatar #29308 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait so I give you Fifa and you give me Wikipedia? HAHAHA you're a funny guy. I should have know you were a joke joking this whole time, you're good fun, see you at the next obvious thing you got wrong.

Also if you knew your stuff, you could have argued "Carlos Bacca had lost control of the ball and David Luiz was going to get it therefore it was only a yellow" While I don't agree with that it is still a good debate and should really be cleared up. Your argument, however, was not
User avatar #29309 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You gave me something from 2004. I gave you an up to date, more explained version of the infringement and you deny it....You're pathetic. Literally too stupid to argue with.
User avatar #29311 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf
Also that PDF is from FIFA for the 2014/2015 season page 39 proves how stupid you really are
#29310 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Also Here is a more updated Fifa Version written in 2012, Apart from handling the ball, where is the keeper exempt
have a nice day now
User avatar #29313 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Literally proving me right, thanks.
User avatar #29314 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Go on then lets hear your explanation
User avatar #29315 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The same as above, you just think twice when reading my arguments can you?
User avatar #29316 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Remind me honey, I fear I may have forgotten
I haven't really forgotten I just think you told a good joke and I want to hear it again
User avatar #29317 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>Clearly win an argument
>Haha nice joke

Are you even trying? 0/10 not even impressed.
#29318 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Ok I'll remind you, You said the Goalkeeper get the advantage when it come to fouls in the box, where in the Print Screen and the link does it say "Except for the Goalkeeper he has the advantage" Except for handling the ball in the area
Also that line "the colombian stood on Cezer" one made me laugh
10/10 would come to you if I ever wanted to feel better about myself
Also his name is César
#29301 - I don't see the problem here. The ref was shit and karma does …  [+] (16 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29302 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
yes because no one has every complained about getting a deserved red card before, also apart from the keeper it doesn't look like anyone really appealed
User avatar #29303 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The keeper was so calm in the encounter. He was literally just walking back for goal pissed that it was a penalty.

Also about "humping the leg of Brazil". I've been complaining about everyone's diving INCLUDING neymar, and guess what, he's gone now.
User avatar #29304 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Again, no one has ever done that before, stop your arguing play an actual game and learn the rules, you're talking to someone who used to play in goal at one point, I knew my boundaries.
I didn't Know Brazil consisted of just Neymar
User avatar #29305 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>a serious offence such as violent conduct or an illegal and purposeful obstruction of a goal scoring opportunity for the opposing team.

Do you even understand English? I know you can't type it but you can't even understand it?

PURPOSEFUL OBSTRUCTION, a foul that was made to purposefully obstruct the player. Julio Cezar was aiming for the ball, but the columbia outplayed Julio so that he could get a foul.

If people followed your rule, the game would be left with goalkeeper vs goalkeeper, because everyone has been sent off.

I used to play with a bunch of guys that were literally selected to go to madrid to try out for the Real Madrid team...
#29306 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Oops did I just pull up the Fifa Rules
User avatar #29307 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You can't be seriously this stupid...
"I'ma get a more brief explanation of the red card because it expresses my point"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_card

Go read the wiki you dipshit...It's more up to day and more explanatory.

TFW a picture from 2004....
User avatar #29308 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait so I give you Fifa and you give me Wikipedia? HAHAHA you're a funny guy. I should have know you were a joke joking this whole time, you're good fun, see you at the next obvious thing you got wrong.

Also if you knew your stuff, you could have argued "Carlos Bacca had lost control of the ball and David Luiz was going to get it therefore it was only a yellow" While I don't agree with that it is still a good debate and should really be cleared up. Your argument, however, was not
User avatar #29309 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You gave me something from 2004. I gave you an up to date, more explained version of the infringement and you deny it....You're pathetic. Literally too stupid to argue with.
User avatar #29311 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf
Also that PDF is from FIFA for the 2014/2015 season page 39 proves how stupid you really are
#29310 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Also Here is a more updated Fifa Version written in 2012, Apart from handling the ball, where is the keeper exempt
have a nice day now
User avatar #29313 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Literally proving me right, thanks.
User avatar #29314 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Go on then lets hear your explanation
User avatar #29315 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The same as above, you just think twice when reading my arguments can you?
User avatar #29316 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Remind me honey, I fear I may have forgotten
I haven't really forgotten I just think you told a good joke and I want to hear it again
User avatar #29317 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>Clearly win an argument
>Haha nice joke

Are you even trying? 0/10 not even impressed.
#29318 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Ok I'll remind you, You said the Goalkeeper get the advantage when it come to fouls in the box, where in the Print Screen and the link does it say "Except for the Goalkeeper he has the advantage" Except for handling the ball in the area
Also that line "the colombian stood on Cezer" one made me laugh
10/10 would come to you if I ever wanted to feel better about myself
Also his name is César
#29299 - No it's not you fucking idiot. He's the goalkeeper, all goalke…  [+] (18 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29300 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIPyZA-6cc
Have a nice day now
Also I'm going to guess that you've never played a game in your life if you don't have any idea how the Offside rule works or how denying a goal scoring opportunity
Also talk about looking at it from one perspective, you've been Humping the leg of Brazil since the tournament began
User avatar #29301 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
I don't see the problem here. The ref was shit and karma does it again. The goalkeeper didn't even expect a card and was infuriated when he did.
User avatar #29302 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
yes because no one has every complained about getting a deserved red card before, also apart from the keeper it doesn't look like anyone really appealed
User avatar #29303 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The keeper was so calm in the encounter. He was literally just walking back for goal pissed that it was a penalty.

Also about "humping the leg of Brazil". I've been complaining about everyone's diving INCLUDING neymar, and guess what, he's gone now.
User avatar #29304 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Again, no one has ever done that before, stop your arguing play an actual game and learn the rules, you're talking to someone who used to play in goal at one point, I knew my boundaries.
I didn't Know Brazil consisted of just Neymar
User avatar #29305 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>a serious offence such as violent conduct or an illegal and purposeful obstruction of a goal scoring opportunity for the opposing team.

Do you even understand English? I know you can't type it but you can't even understand it?

PURPOSEFUL OBSTRUCTION, a foul that was made to purposefully obstruct the player. Julio Cezar was aiming for the ball, but the columbia outplayed Julio so that he could get a foul.

If people followed your rule, the game would be left with goalkeeper vs goalkeeper, because everyone has been sent off.

I used to play with a bunch of guys that were literally selected to go to madrid to try out for the Real Madrid team...
#29306 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Oops did I just pull up the Fifa Rules
User avatar #29307 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You can't be seriously this stupid...
"I'ma get a more brief explanation of the red card because it expresses my point"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_card

Go read the wiki you dipshit...It's more up to day and more explanatory.

TFW a picture from 2004....
User avatar #29308 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait so I give you Fifa and you give me Wikipedia? HAHAHA you're a funny guy. I should have know you were a joke joking this whole time, you're good fun, see you at the next obvious thing you got wrong.

Also if you knew your stuff, you could have argued "Carlos Bacca had lost control of the ball and David Luiz was going to get it therefore it was only a yellow" While I don't agree with that it is still a good debate and should really be cleared up. Your argument, however, was not
User avatar #29309 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You gave me something from 2004. I gave you an up to date, more explained version of the infringement and you deny it....You're pathetic. Literally too stupid to argue with.
User avatar #29311 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf
Also that PDF is from FIFA for the 2014/2015 season page 39 proves how stupid you really are
#29310 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Also Here is a more updated Fifa Version written in 2012, Apart from handling the ball, where is the keeper exempt
have a nice day now
User avatar #29313 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Literally proving me right, thanks.
User avatar #29314 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Go on then lets hear your explanation
User avatar #29315 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The same as above, you just think twice when reading my arguments can you?
User avatar #29316 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Remind me honey, I fear I may have forgotten
I haven't really forgotten I just think you told a good joke and I want to hear it again
User avatar #29317 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>Clearly win an argument
>Haha nice joke

Are you even trying? 0/10 not even impressed.
#29318 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Ok I'll remind you, You said the Goalkeeper get the advantage when it come to fouls in the box, where in the Print Screen and the link does it say "Except for the Goalkeeper he has the advantage" Except for handling the ball in the area
Also that line "the colombian stood on Cezer" one made me laugh
10/10 would come to you if I ever wanted to feel better about myself
Also his name is César
#29297 - I'm sorry what? You want to red card a keeper for trying to de…  [+] (20 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29298 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
So you're saying that as long as the player tried to get the ball then it can never be a red card, Have you ever played a game of footy in your life? Also James Rodriguez was thrown around the pitch all night and never got a free kick, so add that to your little statistics. Why would I hate Brazil I just hate the fact they are getting the benefit of the doubt because they're the home nation
The Rule is if you deny a goal scoring opportunity it is a red card
User avatar #29299 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
No it's not you fucking idiot. He's the goalkeeper, all goalkeepers get the advantage when it comes to fucking fouls. That literally could have been considered a goal kick for brazil because the colombian stood on cezar. You're lucky it even got carded at all...

GK rules are completely different. And how can you still have the guts to say they were getting an advantage after everything I typed?

Even if it was a red card, colombia deserved 2 that weren't even seen by the referee.

2 to fucking 1 cancels it out. It's clear to me you just want brazil out and are watching the game from 1 fucking perspective.
User avatar #29300 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIPyZA-6cc
Have a nice day now
Also I'm going to guess that you've never played a game in your life if you don't have any idea how the Offside rule works or how denying a goal scoring opportunity
Also talk about looking at it from one perspective, you've been Humping the leg of Brazil since the tournament began
User avatar #29301 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
I don't see the problem here. The ref was shit and karma does it again. The goalkeeper didn't even expect a card and was infuriated when he did.
User avatar #29302 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
yes because no one has every complained about getting a deserved red card before, also apart from the keeper it doesn't look like anyone really appealed
User avatar #29303 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The keeper was so calm in the encounter. He was literally just walking back for goal pissed that it was a penalty.

Also about "humping the leg of Brazil". I've been complaining about everyone's diving INCLUDING neymar, and guess what, he's gone now.
User avatar #29304 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Again, no one has ever done that before, stop your arguing play an actual game and learn the rules, you're talking to someone who used to play in goal at one point, I knew my boundaries.
I didn't Know Brazil consisted of just Neymar
User avatar #29305 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>a serious offence such as violent conduct or an illegal and purposeful obstruction of a goal scoring opportunity for the opposing team.

Do you even understand English? I know you can't type it but you can't even understand it?

PURPOSEFUL OBSTRUCTION, a foul that was made to purposefully obstruct the player. Julio Cezar was aiming for the ball, but the columbia outplayed Julio so that he could get a foul.

If people followed your rule, the game would be left with goalkeeper vs goalkeeper, because everyone has been sent off.

I used to play with a bunch of guys that were literally selected to go to madrid to try out for the Real Madrid team...
#29306 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Oops did I just pull up the Fifa Rules
User avatar #29307 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You can't be seriously this stupid...
"I'ma get a more brief explanation of the red card because it expresses my point"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_card

Go read the wiki you dipshit...It's more up to day and more explanatory.

TFW a picture from 2004....
User avatar #29308 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait so I give you Fifa and you give me Wikipedia? HAHAHA you're a funny guy. I should have know you were a joke joking this whole time, you're good fun, see you at the next obvious thing you got wrong.

Also if you knew your stuff, you could have argued "Carlos Bacca had lost control of the ball and David Luiz was going to get it therefore it was only a yellow" While I don't agree with that it is still a good debate and should really be cleared up. Your argument, however, was not
User avatar #29309 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
You gave me something from 2004. I gave you an up to date, more explained version of the infringement and you deny it....You're pathetic. Literally too stupid to argue with.
User avatar #29311 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf
Also that PDF is from FIFA for the 2014/2015 season page 39 proves how stupid you really are
#29310 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Also Here is a more updated Fifa Version written in 2012, Apart from handling the ball, where is the keeper exempt
have a nice day now
User avatar #29313 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Literally proving me right, thanks.
User avatar #29314 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Go on then lets hear your explanation
User avatar #29315 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
The same as above, you just think twice when reading my arguments can you?
User avatar #29316 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Remind me honey, I fear I may have forgotten
I haven't really forgotten I just think you told a good joke and I want to hear it again
User avatar #29317 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
>Clearly win an argument
>Haha nice joke

Are you even trying? 0/10 not even impressed.
#29318 - shakalakaboomboom (07/05/2014) [-]
Ok I'll remind you, You said the Goalkeeper get the advantage when it come to fouls in the box, where in the Print Screen and the link does it say "Except for the Goalkeeper he has the advantage" Except for handling the ball in the area
Also that line "the colombian stood on Cezer" one made me laugh
10/10 would come to you if I ever wanted to feel better about myself
Also his name is César
#29296 - 10/10 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... +1
#29295 - I really hope a miracle happens and costa rica takes netherlan…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... -1
User avatar #29322 - vwanyama (07/05/2014) [-]
Every team in the world has players who dive. If they get away with it they will keep doing it. Sad truth. I think if you are caught cheating the ref then you should get a one match ban, then doubled if you do it again. (if in the league points deduction as well)

Will never happen though, it took them long enough to get goal line technology.

User avatar #29329 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Agreed. I heard somewhere that FIFA told refs to avoid sanctioning divers...
User avatar #29333 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
Every other world cup, sanctioning divers was a thing. This world cup, not even a warning...

But ofcourse, people will do anything to defend le dive inside man
#29293 - You spelled "Le dive inside man" wrong.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/05/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... +1
#29294 - kingdaniel (07/05/2014) [-]
User avatar #29296 - cedrock (07/05/2014) [-]
10/10
#29269 - You don't seem to understand I'm not fighting for 1 team in pa… 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29263 - Yeah because it sickens me. This is a tournament that's suppos… 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29261 - TOP FUCKING KEK. Let me remind you it's based on referee's dec…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29266 - lolidragon (07/04/2014) [-]
Yeah. If both teams dive but the ref sees that one is a liar but doesn't see the other, they both cheated and it is still fair.
User avatar #29269 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand I'm not fighting for 1 team in particular. I'm fighting for the banishment of all diving.
Also. Lets review the Germany vs France match. NOT 1 DIVE ON THE FRENCH SIDE. Players always tried to stay on their feet while running. Meanwhile Germany dived MANY times and succeeded.
#29259 - You can't accept the truth.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29260 - yeorgh (07/04/2014) [-]
I agree with you but that doesn't change the fact that you whine as much as the players you're complaining about.
User avatar #29263 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Yeah because it sickens me. This is a tournament that's supposed to represent countries and skill, and it's being won by bullshit like this...
#29257 - Almost all of them have been legit so far, I don't quite under… 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29254 - Diving is cheating, therefore there is no need for diving at a…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29258 - lolidragon (07/04/2014) [-]
If every team does it, which they do, it isn't bad. no one team is getting an unfair advantage.
User avatar #29261 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
TOP FUCKING KEK. Let me remind you it's based on referee's decision, which is why football is now majorly known as "refball".
User avatar #29266 - lolidragon (07/04/2014) [-]
Yeah. If both teams dive but the ref sees that one is a liar but doesn't see the other, they both cheated and it is still fair.
User avatar #29269 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand I'm not fighting for 1 team in particular. I'm fighting for the banishment of all diving.
Also. Lets review the Germany vs France match. NOT 1 DIVE ON THE FRENCH SIDE. Players always tried to stay on their feet while running. Meanwhile Germany dived MANY times and succeeded.
#29253 - Is this really what people that support columbia think?  [+] (2 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29255 - qwertyjr (07/04/2014) [-]
No no, believe me Brazil is the better team and Colombia is barely holding the possession. Brazil should win this game I want Colombia to win though . But from penalties to refs free kicks...idk, the game just seems off
User avatar #29257 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Almost all of them have been legit so far, I don't quite understand you still.
#29250 - The first time you see a game with barely any diving?  [+] (10 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29252 - qwertyjr (07/04/2014) [-]
No, I mean the game itself seems favored towards Brazil. On and off the field. The whole seems off pace as well.
User avatar #29253 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Is this really what people that support columbia think?
User avatar #29255 - qwertyjr (07/04/2014) [-]
No no, believe me Brazil is the better team and Colombia is barely holding the possession. Brazil should win this game I want Colombia to win though . But from penalties to refs free kicks...idk, the game just seems off
User avatar #29257 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Almost all of them have been legit so far, I don't quite understand you still.
User avatar #29251 - lolidragon (07/04/2014) [-]
There is no need for diving so far there are enough valid penalties
User avatar #29254 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Diving is cheating, therefore there is no need for diving at all. Stop trying to make people respect diving because your team is doing it.
User avatar #29258 - lolidragon (07/04/2014) [-]
If every team does it, which they do, it isn't bad. no one team is getting an unfair advantage.
User avatar #29261 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
TOP FUCKING KEK. Let me remind you it's based on referee's decision, which is why football is now majorly known as "refball".
User avatar #29266 - lolidragon (07/04/2014) [-]
Yeah. If both teams dive but the ref sees that one is a liar but doesn't see the other, they both cheated and it is still fair.
User avatar #29269 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand I'm not fighting for 1 team in particular. I'm fighting for the banishment of all diving.
Also. Lets review the Germany vs France match. NOT 1 DIVE ON THE FRENCH SIDE. Players always tried to stay on their feet while running. Meanwhile Germany dived MANY times and succeeded.
#29242 - Oh boy I see you really spend your time in very productive ways. 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29240 - Try finding a better one to prove me wrong. I looked through 1… 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29237 - You don't win oscar without skill* FTFY.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29238 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
Quality video you've got there.
User avatar #29240 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Try finding a better one to prove me wrong. I looked through 10.

Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZPSmMuNNm0

Literally the whole game described there. Top tier mueller acting, shit-tier Portugal gameplay.
#29235 - AHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA PORTUGAL'S TRASHING WAS…  [+] (6 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29242 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Oh boy I see you really spend your time in very productive ways.
User avatar #29236 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
Relax there. You don't get to the semi-finals without skills.
User avatar #29237 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP4ir0pb0wM

You don't win oscar without skill*

FTFY.
User avatar #29238 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
Quality video you've got there.
User avatar #29240 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Try finding a better one to prove me wrong. I looked through 10.

Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZPSmMuNNm0

Literally the whole game described there. Top tier mueller acting, shit-tier Portugal gameplay.
#29233 - Nah, my team is winning currently, I'm happy, just a daily rem…  [+] (8 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29234 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
So Portugal's trashing wasn't skills?
User avatar #29235 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
AHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
PORTUGAL'S TRASHING WAS THE EASIEST GAME EVER. The whole team fucking gave up after the first 10 min yellow card penalty, and I don't blame them because that was utter bullshit.
User avatar #29242 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Oh boy I see you really spend your time in very productive ways.
User avatar #29236 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
Relax there. You don't get to the semi-finals without skills.
User avatar #29237 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP4ir0pb0wM

You don't win oscar without skill*

FTFY.
User avatar #29238 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
Quality video you've got there.
User avatar #29240 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Try finding a better one to prove me wrong. I looked through 10.

Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZPSmMuNNm0

Literally the whole game described there. Top tier mueller acting, shit-tier Portugal gameplay.
#29229 - Even your kind of "muh fairplay award" did the most … 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29227 - But mostly mueller I agree. 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
#29226 - I was referring to the whole team.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Sports - sports news, news... 0
User avatar #29228 - christmouth (07/04/2014) [-]
Didn't look like that.
User avatar #29229 - cedrock (07/04/2014) [-]
Even your kind of "muh fairplay award" did the most ridiculous dive ever...
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 207 / Total items point value: 1765

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #10 - bananafly (12/19/2013) [-]
Hey, do you have a spare hearthstone key?
User avatar #11 to #10 - cedrock (12/19/2013) [-]
Nope sorry got mine from a friend just yesterday...
User avatar #12 to #11 - bananafly (12/19/2013) [-]
Oh, ok
User avatar #8 - nippuhl (07/12/2013) [-]
Hi Dylan
User avatar #9 to #8 - cedrock (07/12/2013) [-]
Sup Ralph.
User avatar #4 - NutHut (02/26/2012) [-]
Happy birthday!
#5 to #12 - CanadianPete has deleted their comment [-]
#3 - rottencrotch **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#2 - ohiobro **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)