captainprincess
Rank #25 on Comments
Level 390 Comments: Demi God Offline
Send mail to captainprincess Block captainprincess Invite captainprincess to be your friend flag avatar
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Age: | 24 |
| Facebook Profile: | No |
| Youtube Channel: | TheLemonGrenade |
| Steam Profile: | CaptainPrincess |
| Consoles Owned: | a 9 yearold piece of shit PC |
| Video Games Played: | Vermintide, dawngate, smite, warframe, dawn of war, tf2, risk of rain, space engineers, guns of icarus |
| X-box Gamertag: | GrimReaper2005 (I am not kidding |
| PSN: | klungefat I think I cant remembe |
| Interests: | 420 b0ss, WH40k, choas, ponyfaggotry, faggotry in general, philosophy |
| Date Signed Up: | 3/21/2013 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| Location: | The Formless Wastes |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #3556 |
| Comment Ranking: | #25 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #1349 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #14 |
| Content Thumbs: | 2801 total,
3363 ,
562 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 121844 total,
149642 ,
27798 |
| Content Level Progress: | 99% (99/100) Level 121 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 122 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry |
| Comment Level Progress: | 60.3% (603/1000) Level 390 Comments: Demi God → Level 391 Comments: Demi God |
| Subscribers: | 14 |
| Content Views: | 236803 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 158 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 31857 |
| FJ Points: | 84712 |
| Favorite Tags: | OC (3) | fucking (2) | Risk of Rain (2) | warhammer (2) | wh40k (2) | You (2) |
eeeheheheheheheHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEEHEHEHEHEAHAEJHASEJKHEA SLJKHALKSFJHLASFKHASLDJBASLFGHASJHASEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH
latest user's comments
| #22 - Im too hot, dog | 20 hours ago on Do want | +1 |
| #173 - No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physica… [+] (1 new reply) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
 Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #166 - They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to… [+] (18 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #161 - Fine fine I'll do it just for you bby Sex = Gende… [+] (20 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to themselves Their complication does not affect others but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #157 - The excuse was that even my initial indirect response is obvio… [+] (22 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| Fine fine I'll do it just for you bby Sex = Gender Gender = Sex Except when sex is a verb They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to themselves Their complication does not affect others but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #155 - actually Im dancing around the issue because it amuses me to d… [+] (25 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| #452 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] His excuse is he's a fucking troll with tolerance issues and demands that reality bow to his extremely narrow viewpoint. The sad part is that he's gay and still spitting on transgender issues. The excuse was that even my initial indirect response is obvious enough clarification is wholly unnecessary so you needing clarification is silly and it amuses me to refuse you Fine fine I'll do it just for you bby Sex = Gender Gender = Sex Except when sex is a verb They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to themselves Their complication does not affect others but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #151 - I dont know if the verb-half of sex is irrelevant [+] (27 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | -1 |
| You're literally arguing semantics for a definition of sex that isn't being questioned here. Sex (noun) - your biological sex. Gender (noun) - the sex you identify as independent of your biological sex. Now from what I have been trying to understand, you seem to be saying my second definition is incorrect. Can you please answer me straight rather than dancing around irrelevant semantic arguments relating to the words rather than the things the words describe? actually Im dancing around the issue because it amuses me to deliberately avoid being straightforward and direct when someone tells you to be straightforward and direct #452 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] His excuse is he's a fucking troll with tolerance issues and demands that reality bow to his extremely narrow viewpoint. The sad part is that he's gay and still spitting on transgender issues. The excuse was that even my initial indirect response is obvious enough clarification is wholly unnecessary so you needing clarification is silly and it amuses me to refuse you Fine fine I'll do it just for you bby Sex = Gender Gender = Sex Except when sex is a verb They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to themselves Their complication does not affect others but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #146 - well one is also a verb unless you know how to gender… [+] (29 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | -1 |
| You're literally arguing semantics for a definition of sex that isn't being questioned here. Sex (noun) - your biological sex. Gender (noun) - the sex you identify as independent of your biological sex. Now from what I have been trying to understand, you seem to be saying my second definition is incorrect. Can you please answer me straight rather than dancing around irrelevant semantic arguments relating to the words rather than the things the words describe? actually Im dancing around the issue because it amuses me to deliberately avoid being straightforward and direct when someone tells you to be straightforward and direct #452 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] His excuse is he's a fucking troll with tolerance issues and demands that reality bow to his extremely narrow viewpoint. The sad part is that he's gay and still spitting on transgender issues. The excuse was that even my initial indirect response is obvious enough clarification is wholly unnecessary so you needing clarification is silly and it amuses me to refuse you Fine fine I'll do it just for you bby Sex = Gender Gender = Sex Except when sex is a verb They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to themselves Their complication does not affect others but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #142 - That was a straight answer Im saying I would have to … [+] (31 new replies) | 20 hours ago on The Facts | -1 |
| well one is also a verb unless you know how to gender someone or have hot steamy gender You're literally arguing semantics for a definition of sex that isn't being questioned here. Sex (noun) - your biological sex. Gender (noun) - the sex you identify as independent of your biological sex. Now from what I have been trying to understand, you seem to be saying my second definition is incorrect. Can you please answer me straight rather than dancing around irrelevant semantic arguments relating to the words rather than the things the words describe? actually Im dancing around the issue because it amuses me to deliberately avoid being straightforward and direct when someone tells you to be straightforward and direct #452 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] His excuse is he's a fucking troll with tolerance issues and demands that reality bow to his extremely narrow viewpoint. The sad part is that he's gay and still spitting on transgender issues. The excuse was that even my initial indirect response is obvious enough clarification is wholly unnecessary so you needing clarification is silly and it amuses me to refuse you Fine fine I'll do it just for you bby Sex = Gender Gender = Sex Except when sex is a verb They make the issue more complicated, but only with respect to themselves Their complication does not affect others but they literally embody the asynchrony of sex and gender. Because of their exposure/lack of exposure to the appropriate levels of perinatal testosterone their brains did not masculanize/feminize properly. Now perinatal testosterone is not an on/off switch. The reason why gender is considered a spectrum is because that perinatal surge can to varying degrees masculanize or feminize your brain, making you more likely to feel comfortable taking on the natural roles of one sex over the other. You don't HAVE to be trans to be a very effeminate man, you don't have to be trans to be a very butch woman. Does that make sense? And mine is that they are one and the same, regardless of a person's brain chemistry or mental issues Your 'self identity' is just that your self identity label, even, if you like signifier maybe, if you want to be flowery title, perhaps alter-ego whatever you like Hell Im not even strongly opposed to the mis-use of the term gender I will simply continue to believe that this is a mis-use of the term and leave it at that I said it makes sense i.e I can see that it would happen Brain chemistry is funny like that However brain chemistry has no effect on what something means It does not alter concepts, it alters people And then those people alter themselves in an attempt to reach some kind of stability or personal equilibrium And all of this takes place without impacting the meaning of a term and the concept it represents I have made absolutely no assertion that sex and gender are separate No agreement has been reached, not even the semblance of such A disagreement isn't necessarily a problem It's only a problem if you cannot handle differing views Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development. It makes sense but it doesnt suddenly liquify the concept of sex It does not make a man a woman or vice versa Nor does it allow for this to become the case It explains only the reasons why someone would want to alter their body to emulate something they aren't No they embody a mental problem which has been given a physical solution They do not exist as a seperate "gender" or anything of the sort, they are simply mis-aligned on the binary, and most societies have opted to allow one direction of alignment over the other Yes, they have a mental problem. Their brains received an inappropriate level of perinatal testosterone. Essentially, just as men are born a HUGE influx of testosterone is released that masculanizes their brains. Imagine if this boost didn't happen? You said it yourself, we exist on a binary, if they weren't masculanized, by default they would be feminized. These are trans folks who transition from male to female. Now what if the surge happened, but only half as much testosterone as was necessary to masculanize the brain was present. Well, the brain would theoretically partially masculanize. This would result in a more feminine male. The reverse is true for females. Does this make sense? | ||
| #6 - Its not much of a hobby my hobby consists of whining … | 20 hours ago on Drugs | +7 |
| #107 - harsh | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +1 |
| #105 - I mean What else were you aiming at [+] (2 new replies) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| | ||
| #17 - Wurst > Hotdog [+] (2 new replies) | 21 hours ago on Do want | +5 |
| | ||
| #16 - jfc china how American do you need to be | 21 hours ago on Do want | +5 |
| #102 - oh yeah those pink lines are pretty autismussy [+] (4 new replies) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +1 |
| | ||
| #92 - aight idk "lemme rephrase that" sounds conf… [+] (6 new replies) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +2 |
| | ||
| #3 - I let them in If you know what youre doing you can st… [+] (6 new replies) | 21 hours ago on Drugs | +15 |
 My dad wouldn't let them in but he was a practicing minister at the time. He'd answer the door, dressed normally, and say "Excuse me, I'm not fully dressed" then he'd get his white stiff collar (commonly known as a dog collar) and come back with it on. They'd usually freak out and leave #11 -
soldiertwo (15 hours ago) [-]  and used to talk with them for a bit, so one day they came by with a bible for him, but unfortunately he wasn't home, but my dad was, so he asked them to give the bible, afterwards he immediately ran out and threw it on the lawn, to move it over with the lawnmower.  Thats more of a dick move than anything, and he accomplished nothing by doing that Its not much of a hobby my hobby consists of whining to myself over how I dont do the things I wish I were doing | ||
| #15 - Jesus **** the Bed that was just nasty | 21 hours ago on Ovarian cancer | 0 |
| #2 - Just as we survived the loss of other greats like Lemmy, Robin… [+] (2 new replies) | 21 hours ago on unfinished comic | +1 |
| | ||
| #5 - Yes I can I can say talent isn't wholly necessary to … | 21 hours ago on There's only 7 billion... | +3 |
| #80 - ok but the gender itself has not changed I repeat … [+] (14 new replies) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +5 |
| #450 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] The SEX has not changed. The GENDER has changed. Even if you don't agree, it doesn't matter because that's just how it is. You arguing your denial is just trying to force your narrow, outmoded view point on others who are finally waking up just because you fear comprehension. As a homosexual you should honestly understand what these people are going through. The denial, the hatred, the offense, the fear of rejection. Instead you're just adding to it. A naturally ignorant cis-gendered straight person being insensitive is practically expected - but you've HAD to have shared some of their hardships and you're still this much of a putz on the subject? That's sickening. #455 -
anon (9 hours ago) [-] Categorically different. Just because you think something is one way doesn't mean it suddenly precludes the experiences and hardships of thousands of other people and automatically makes everyone around you wrong. You demand others to prove to you they're not the same. Prove to me that they ARE the same. I want incontrovertible evidence, with personal annotations of first and second hand experiences on the subject that conclusively proves that all the specialists, the untold thousands of people suffering now and perhaps even millions since the dawn of civilization who have suffered or simply couldn't live with that suffering any longer - are in all ways wrong, and that only your view is correct. If you demand it of others, I demand it of you. If you cannot, then chances are highly likely that this is just your inexperienced opinion and that you've spread it around enough that it's time for you to stop. #460 -
anon (9 hours ago) [-] In other words you are not only ignorant, you choose to remain ignorant, because knowledge scares you. Maybe spending some time in Uganda would give you a better idea of hardship and the necessity of solidarity. | ||
| #76 - Ok I can roll with thyat But that's not gender … [+] (16 new replies) | 22 hours ago on The Facts | +5 |
| ok but the gender itself has not changed I repeat no matter how feminine a man is, he remains a man #450 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] The SEX has not changed. The GENDER has changed. Even if you don't agree, it doesn't matter because that's just how it is. You arguing your denial is just trying to force your narrow, outmoded view point on others who are finally waking up just because you fear comprehension. As a homosexual you should honestly understand what these people are going through. The denial, the hatred, the offense, the fear of rejection. Instead you're just adding to it. A naturally ignorant cis-gendered straight person being insensitive is practically expected - but you've HAD to have shared some of their hardships and you're still this much of a putz on the subject? That's sickening. #455 -
anon (9 hours ago) [-] Categorically different. Just because you think something is one way doesn't mean it suddenly precludes the experiences and hardships of thousands of other people and automatically makes everyone around you wrong. You demand others to prove to you they're not the same. Prove to me that they ARE the same. I want incontrovertible evidence, with personal annotations of first and second hand experiences on the subject that conclusively proves that all the specialists, the untold thousands of people suffering now and perhaps even millions since the dawn of civilization who have suffered or simply couldn't live with that suffering any longer - are in all ways wrong, and that only your view is correct. If you demand it of others, I demand it of you. If you cannot, then chances are highly likely that this is just your inexperienced opinion and that you've spread it around enough that it's time for you to stop. #460 -
anon (9 hours ago) [-] In other words you are not only ignorant, you choose to remain ignorant, because knowledge scares you. Maybe spending some time in Uganda would give you a better idea of hardship and the necessity of solidarity. | ||
| #58 - that tiny little pic cracked me up far harder than it had any right to | 22 hours ago on Anyone Remember The Captain... | +1 |
| #57 - and in all fairness she isnt as gorgeous as they draw either … | 22 hours ago on Anyone Remember The Captain... | +4 |
| #56 - with each consecutive image her clothing got smaller neat | 22 hours ago on Anyone Remember The Captain... | +2 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
104 comments displayed.
#478 to #477
-
captainprincess (01/08/2016) [-] sosiallinen
keskiyöllä
funnyjunkissa
no hyvin tehty
keskiyöllä
funnyjunkissa
no hyvin tehty
#446
-
mayoroftownsville (01/01/2016) [-]
Hit the reply limit.
If your boss made you get a sick note anyway after the company stopped requiring it and they were billed, then that would be on his neck not yours. But I'm not interested in individual situations, I'm interested in the whole. Say there are a few hundred people working for the company in question. Prior to the company dropping the sick not policy, 100% of them would go to the doctor to get a note when they stay home from work - a requirement. But if it were no longer required, while some or even many of them still would go to the doctor, it's highly unlikely that all of them would keep going. It's common knowledge that there is no cure for the common cold, and many people don't go to the doctor for it for that reason. Is it possible that each and every employee would be in some weird personal position where they still decide to go to the doctor's office once it isn't required? Sure, in all the many universes there are some where that happens. But is it likely? Hell the **** no.
And yes, it is wasted time if they just have a cold, because there is literally nothing the doctor can do for them. It's the doctor's job to treat them but that doesn't mean jack when there isn't a treatment. In this case the doctor loses time, the patient gains nothing, and other patients are potentially exposed to a virus.
If your boss made you get a sick note anyway after the company stopped requiring it and they were billed, then that would be on his neck not yours. But I'm not interested in individual situations, I'm interested in the whole. Say there are a few hundred people working for the company in question. Prior to the company dropping the sick not policy, 100% of them would go to the doctor to get a note when they stay home from work - a requirement. But if it were no longer required, while some or even many of them still would go to the doctor, it's highly unlikely that all of them would keep going. It's common knowledge that there is no cure for the common cold, and many people don't go to the doctor for it for that reason. Is it possible that each and every employee would be in some weird personal position where they still decide to go to the doctor's office once it isn't required? Sure, in all the many universes there are some where that happens. But is it likely? Hell the **** no.
And yes, it is wasted time if they just have a cold, because there is literally nothing the doctor can do for them. It's the doctor's job to treat them but that doesn't mean jack when there isn't a treatment. In this case the doctor loses time, the patient gains nothing, and other patients are potentially exposed to a virus.
#447 to #446
-
captainprincess (01/01/2016) [-] Diagnoses isnt a treatment
yet it's crucially important to make for a treatment
how do you get a diagnoses
with an examination
examinations are a doctor doing their job, not wasting time
yet it's crucially important to make for a treatment
how do you get a diagnoses
with an examination
examinations are a doctor doing their job, not wasting time
#448 to #447
-
mayoroftownsville (01/01/2016) [-]
Anyone can diagnose a common cold. Have you ever had blood drawn to test for rhinovirus? No, because the symptoms are obvious, known to everyone, and by the time the test was over it would be gone.
#449 to #448
-
captainprincess (01/01/2016) [-] And anyone could mis-diagnose a serious illness as a cold
#450 to #449
-
mayoroftownsville (01/01/2016) [-]
So would the doctor unless you're missing something really obvious. If you go to the doctor with cold symptoms, they will send you home and tell you to come back if it gets worse or new symptoms appear. As long as you aren't retarded enough to miss something obvious like a rash or black phlegm, you have the same exact ability to diagnose or misdiagnose a cold as a doctor.
#451 to #450
-
captainprincess (01/01/2016) [-] better chance of him knowing than me
He's got medical training
He's got medical training
#452 to #451
-
mayoroftownsville (01/01/2016) [-]
Not by much. A doctor can't magically differentiate one set of cold-like symptoms from another, and if you're a human living on the planet earth, you probably have close to as much experience with colds as them. But feel free to go in and demand a blood test next time you have the sniffles, no skin off my back. All I'm saying is that plenty of people won't do that if they aren't required to, and likely for the greater good.
#453 to #452
-
captainprincess (01/01/2016) [-] They might do
Certainly got a better shot at it than I do
I dont know, Im not a doctor
Certainly got a better shot at it than I do
I dont know, Im not a doctor
#437 to #436
-
cognosceteipsum (12/26/2015) [-] Wow just read you got billed for it. Sorry about that.
#440 to #439
-
captainprincess (12/26/2015) [-] Oh
yeah
but thats the past and teenagers are awful people
so yknow
yeah
but thats the past and teenagers are awful people
so yknow
#441 to #440
-
cognosceteipsum (12/26/2015) [-] Ye and I assume Finns aren't the most accepting when it comes to this stuff
#442 to #441
-
captainprincess (12/26/2015) [-] I dont know
they're pretty decent about it
I did my schooling in the UK where you're lucky if you dont get assaulted every other day over it
they're pretty decent about it
I did my schooling in the UK where you're lucky if you dont get assaulted every other day over it
#444 to #443
-
captainprincess (12/26/2015) [-] It does but that's life
gotta stand up and get on with it
gotta stand up and get on with it
#431
-
anonymousbrony (11/15/2015) [-] I've seen your art. Now that I now you are exceptional at drawing I must have you mention me.
NOTICE THIS
NOTICE THIS
#418 to #417
-
captainprincess (10/11/2015) [-] literally happened to me at school
That and a good few beatings
That and a good few beatings
#420 to #419
-
captainprincess (10/11/2015) [-] Yeah
I didn't really get to wait, myself
Got busted in the act and outed
Took it like a champ though
Got beat up but I gave as good as I got
...some times
I didn't really get to wait, myself
Got busted in the act and outed
Took it like a champ though
Got beat up but I gave as good as I got
...some times
#424 to #423
-
captainprincess (10/11/2015) [-] well I mean
How spicy are a pair of 15 yearolds liable to get, really
I mean it was on school grounds so that was kind of tense
But the dude didn't even come to school after we got caught
I'm thinking he told his folks and got immediately shuffled away witness protection style
How spicy are a pair of 15 yearolds liable to get, really
I mean it was on school grounds so that was kind of tense
But the dude didn't even come to school after we got caught
I'm thinking he told his folks and got immediately shuffled away witness protection style
#415 to #414
-
lulzdealer ONLINE (10/07/2015) [-] Well gosh, then this whole thing was a waste. What else did you think I was trying to accomplish.
#409 to #408
-
captainprincess (10/03/2015) [-] Eh
maybe
But Im on FJ
What's he going to do, waste my time?
maybe
But Im on FJ
What's he going to do, waste my time?
#401 to #400
-
captainprincess (09/27/2015) [-] Just ate and scratched my balls
safe to say I'm peachy
safe to say I'm peachy
#395 to #394
-
captainprincess (09/23/2015) [-] Actually
I've spent a good deal of money in warframe, more than enough to supercede a retail price
I bought the ultimate godpack in smite, which is effectively buying the game instead of playing the free grind route
and I got tf2 from the orange box
So no, not really
I have a slight distrust for free to plays actually
They tend to screw you over in subtle ways
I've spent a good deal of money in warframe, more than enough to supercede a retail price
I bought the ultimate godpack in smite, which is effectively buying the game instead of playing the free grind route
and I got tf2 from the orange box
So no, not really
I have a slight distrust for free to plays actually
They tend to screw you over in subtle ways
#397 to #396
-
captainprincess (09/23/2015) [-] I tell ymself I'm the same
but ultimately, if I'm willing to buy a game, I'm willing to pay into a free game to bypass atleast some of the skinnerbox grinding
The basic equation is that I'm willing to throw money out and take entertainment back in, and I have to actually admit it to myself
but ultimately, if I'm willing to buy a game, I'm willing to pay into a free game to bypass atleast some of the skinnerbox grinding
The basic equation is that I'm willing to throw money out and take entertainment back in, and I have to actually admit it to myself
#388 to #387
-
cubanwhiteman (08/28/2015) [-] Nevermind, you left a comment yesterday on some post that people in that group usually say.
