I dunno i don't think that attitude changes over time. Either you had that at the release or you wont have it i assume. It's more like the people who care watch it early and now we have passed the time where people who don't care that much have watched it aswell. Leaving the ones who haven't watched it but still care as a small minority which makes us wonder why they haven't watched it if they care.
Speaking in metaphors:
If you and your family make plans for going to the restaurant and by the time you are there which is 10 minutes before planned and they are already half through the food you would be annoyed but if you are 30 minutes late you kinda lost your right to complain. Doesn't mean you didn't want to eat together but at least the blame isn't with your family as in the first case.

Is that why you're such a big meanie?

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

For sociology? Gives an extra variable we can use to track statistics in a population. Are people who experience a difference in their gender and sex more likely to suffer from certain ailments, or commit crimes, or suffer prejudice? You can't track that without distinguishing between the two, and you can't combat it without tracking it.

Psychology/Psychiatry? Aforementioned knowledge of whether they're more likely to suffer from certain ailments extends to those of the mind, too. Sure, you might say that gender dysphoria is a disease in and of itself, to which I would respond that that kind of thinking is at least just as bad. In any case, it's easier to treat someone when you're not ignoring aspects of their personality. How does this affect you? Well, it'd be better for you if there were less psychotic people wandering around, surely. An extreme example, but not the only one.

Interpersonal relationships? People are less likely to think you're a prick if you're not baselessly outright rejecting things they say about themselves. By all means, call them out if they're being attention whores, but not everyone is. Not even most people are.

Let me turn it back around on you, now. Why is gender the same as sex? Despite the fact that the English language can only be improved by adding meaning to words that were previously synonymous, despite the fact that it is a thing that people all over the place are experiencing, despite the fact that it's useful in various situations, and despite the fact that the dictionary no longer supports your definition, you say they are the same thing. Why?

Sociology:
Im not convinced of that
Not that I hold the highest regard for sociology in general but that in particular sounds like bunk to me. You have at it but Im not buying that. Especially when you frame it as the only variable by which these things can be studied, which I understand was not your intent but your focus on somehow proving this focus to be of critical importance has given you that air.

Psychology:
See above, though I have a little more faith in the field but again, this sounds like some gum-flapping. I do not buy that these things are personality aspects in the first place, specifically because I am as yet convinced that every instance of such claims is a bid for attention by vapid and delusional individuals who want to stand apart from the crowd as they are incapable of handling the idea that they are insignificant or not special.

Relationships:
Cry me a river

The reason i still thing Gender = Sex is the same reason I don't pray to a god
I've no reason to. I have yet to be convinced that it is necessary or there is any good reason to do so. I also don't believe in a spectral pink teapot that floats around in space and will determine the future of the universe based on the fashion choices of a lesbian from newyork city. What reason have I to buy into it, when the only argument for it so far as been "But you gotta!"

Youve given me some reasons yes
And they havent been very good ones, so I am not won over
Failing that I am left at square 1, people want me to believe in this thing because...
because they want me to? because it makes them feel better? because it gives them more to whine about when their super secret space gender in their head is somehow slighted?

Under more ordinary circumstances I wouldnt be so opposed, but the last several months have given me pause for thought on why I should simply accept this and that because why not. Well there is a 'why not', and it is that this shit is being used to drive peoples lives to ruin over invented slights and hurt feelings. Institutions of education being turned into stepford culdesacs of feefees and comfort, professionals stripped from their jobs and humour being stamped out.

Ofcourse this isn't everyone but these occurences have given me a reason to stop and seriously consider if I want to accept something, simply because why not?

That's my why not, and that means something which might have previously slid past on "yeah sure I cant see any problem with that I guess" now has to prove its worth being accepted, that there's a good reason to take it in.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

It's unambiguously useful. Whether or not it is a correct usage of the word depends entirely on whether or not it is used that way in the language. Which it is, to the point that it's now recognized as such in dictionaries.

Gender is the state of being male, female or some variation thereof with respect to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.

You keep saying it's useful
And nothing else

Not, for instance, any way in which it is useful, only that it is
Ok

Now you say it's unambiguoously useful

uh huh
how

Gender is Sex

For sociology? Gives an extra variable we can use to track statistics in a population. Are people who experience a difference in their gender and sex more likely to suffer from certain ailments, or commit crimes, or suffer prejudice? You can't track that without distinguishing between the two, and you can't combat it without tracking it.

Psychology/Psychiatry? Aforementioned knowledge of whether they're more likely to suffer from certain ailments extends to those of the mind, too. Sure, you might say that gender dysphoria is a disease in and of itself, to which I would respond that that kind of thinking is at least just as bad. In any case, it's easier to treat someone when you're not ignoring aspects of their personality. How does this affect you? Well, it'd be better for you if there were less psychotic people wandering around, surely. An extreme example, but not the only one.

Interpersonal relationships? People are less likely to think you're a prick if you're not baselessly outright rejecting things they say about themselves. By all means, call them out if they're being attention whores, but not everyone is. Not even most people are.

Let me turn it back around on you, now. Why is gender the same as sex? Despite the fact that the English language can only be improved by adding meaning to words that were previously synonymous, despite the fact that it is a thing that people all over the place are experiencing, despite the fact that it's useful in various situations, and despite the fact that the dictionary no longer supports your definition, you say they are the same thing. Why?

Sociology:
Im not convinced of that
Not that I hold the highest regard for sociology in general but that in particular sounds like bunk to me. You have at it but Im not buying that. Especially when you frame it as the only variable by which these things can be studied, which I understand was not your intent but your focus on somehow proving this focus to be of critical importance has given you that air.

Psychology:
See above, though I have a little more faith in the field but again, this sounds like some gum-flapping. I do not buy that these things are personality aspects in the first place, specifically because I am as yet convinced that every instance of such claims is a bid for attention by vapid and delusional individuals who want to stand apart from the crowd as they are incapable of handling the idea that they are insignificant or not special.

Relationships:
Cry me a river

The reason i still thing Gender = Sex is the same reason I don't pray to a god
I've no reason to. I have yet to be convinced that it is necessary or there is any good reason to do so. I also don't believe in a spectral pink teapot that floats around in space and will determine the future of the universe based on the fashion choices of a lesbian from newyork city. What reason have I to buy into it, when the only argument for it so far as been "But you gotta!"

Youve given me some reasons yes
And they havent been very good ones, so I am not won over
Failing that I am left at square 1, people want me to believe in this thing because...
because they want me to? because it makes them feel better? because it gives them more to whine about when their super secret space gender in their head is somehow slighted?

Under more ordinary circumstances I wouldnt be so opposed, but the last several months have given me pause for thought on why I should simply accept this and that because why not. Well there is a 'why not', and it is that this shit is being used to drive peoples lives to ruin over invented slights and hurt feelings. Institutions of education being turned into stepford culdesacs of feefees and comfort, professionals stripped from their jobs and humour being stamped out.

Ofcourse this isn't everyone but these occurences have given me a reason to stop and seriously consider if I want to accept something, simply because why not?

That's my why not, and that means something which might have previously slid past on "yeah sure I cant see any problem with that I guess" now has to prove its worth being accepted, that there's a good reason to take it in.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

I genuinely don't understand how you can acknowledge that it is a useful and true thing in some situations but not accept that it is a useful and true thing.

This is like saying a doctor isn't an authority on how your body works so you don't accept that you have an immune system. Or that a physicist isn't an authority on how the universe works so you don't accept the idea that stars aren't on fire. Or any other such retarded thing.

I never said it was true
I said they see it as useful
THATS what I recognize

This does not make it true

I have to be convinced of it's truth and if the only reason to have believed stars are on fire is so that it makes more sense when some lunatic talks about his star-blisters I wouldnt have believed it

But noone has given any actual good reason for why gender and sex are any different, and of those who try, their only explanation for what gender suddenly means is "Your self identity"

Ok
My "gender" is a sentient latex buttplug
And you need to believe it because gender is a thing

It's unambiguously useful. Whether or not it is a correct usage of the word depends entirely on whether or not it is used that way in the language. Which it is, to the point that it's now recognized as such in dictionaries.

Gender is the state of being male, female or some variation thereof with respect to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.

You keep saying it's useful
And nothing else

Not, for instance, any way in which it is useful, only that it is
Ok

Now you say it's unambiguoously useful

uh huh
how

Gender is Sex

For sociology? Gives an extra variable we can use to track statistics in a population. Are people who experience a difference in their gender and sex more likely to suffer from certain ailments, or commit crimes, or suffer prejudice? You can't track that without distinguishing between the two, and you can't combat it without tracking it.

Psychology/Psychiatry? Aforementioned knowledge of whether they're more likely to suffer from certain ailments extends to those of the mind, too. Sure, you might say that gender dysphoria is a disease in and of itself, to which I would respond that that kind of thinking is at least just as bad. In any case, it's easier to treat someone when you're not ignoring aspects of their personality. How does this affect you? Well, it'd be better for you if there were less psychotic people wandering around, surely. An extreme example, but not the only one.

Interpersonal relationships? People are less likely to think you're a prick if you're not baselessly outright rejecting things they say about themselves. By all means, call them out if they're being attention whores, but not everyone is. Not even most people are.

Let me turn it back around on you, now. Why is gender the same as sex? Despite the fact that the English language can only be improved by adding meaning to words that were previously synonymous, despite the fact that it is a thing that people all over the place are experiencing, despite the fact that it's useful in various situations, and despite the fact that the dictionary no longer supports your definition, you say they are the same thing. Why?

Sociology:
Im not convinced of that
Not that I hold the highest regard for sociology in general but that in particular sounds like bunk to me. You have at it but Im not buying that. Especially when you frame it as the only variable by which these things can be studied, which I understand was not your intent but your focus on somehow proving this focus to be of critical importance has given you that air.

Psychology:
See above, though I have a little more faith in the field but again, this sounds like some gum-flapping. I do not buy that these things are personality aspects in the first place, specifically because I am as yet convinced that every instance of such claims is a bid for attention by vapid and delusional individuals who want to stand apart from the crowd as they are incapable of handling the idea that they are insignificant or not special.

Relationships:
Cry me a river

The reason i still thing Gender = Sex is the same reason I don't pray to a god
I've no reason to. I have yet to be convinced that it is necessary or there is any good reason to do so. I also don't believe in a spectral pink teapot that floats around in space and will determine the future of the universe based on the fashion choices of a lesbian from newyork city. What reason have I to buy into it, when the only argument for it so far as been "But you gotta!"

Youve given me some reasons yes
And they havent been very good ones, so I am not won over
Failing that I am left at square 1, people want me to believe in this thing because...
because they want me to? because it makes them feel better? because it gives them more to whine about when their super secret space gender in their head is somehow slighted?

Under more ordinary circumstances I wouldnt be so opposed, but the last several months have given me pause for thought on why I should simply accept this and that because why not. Well there is a 'why not', and it is that this shit is being used to drive peoples lives to ruin over invented slights and hurt feelings. Institutions of education being turned into stepford culdesacs of feefees and comfort, professionals stripped from their jobs and humour being stamped out.

Ofcourse this isn't everyone but these occurences have given me a reason to stop and seriously consider if I want to accept something, simply because why not?

That's my why not, and that means something which might have previously slid past on "yeah sure I cant see any problem with that I guess" now has to prove its worth being accepted, that there's a good reason to take it in.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

Actually my argument is "Im not convinced by your weak ass argument to believe in this nonsense"

I wasn't talking about you, but you've acknowledge the point I wanted you to acknowledge. That point being that it is useful in certain fields.

How then, can you deny it's a thing? There are many things that have literally no bearing on how you act, but would be stupid to deny. The world being round -ish , for example.

The fact that you're not invested in understanding it has no bearing on whether or not it's true. I don't understand quantum superposition, and have no intention to learn about it, but that doesn't mean that I deny it's true simply because it doesn't make sense to me.

Besides which, I find it odd how you say you're not invested in understanding it, but I've seen you comment in these discussions like half a dozen times by now. Like, why involve yourself in discussions when you're not going to make the effort to inform yourself about the topic? That's sorta #Rood to everyone involved.

I can deny its a thing because I do not see those people with their reasons to see it as a thing as being an authority on the thing, or on anything outside of their field

What I mean is that
their decisions are, as yet, not relevant to me and my life
They havent yet had any reason to dictate my view on the world
So whatever use they have for it, is irrelevant to me, and so I see no reason to change how I see things to suit their uses

As for why I talk about something Im not invested in:
That's easy

I felt like it

I genuinely don't understand how you can acknowledge that it is a useful and true thing in some situations but not accept that it is a useful and true thing.

This is like saying a doctor isn't an authority on how your body works so you don't accept that you have an immune system. Or that a physicist isn't an authority on how the universe works so you don't accept the idea that stars aren't on fire. Or any other such retarded thing.

I never said it was true
I said they see it as useful
THATS what I recognize

This does not make it true

I have to be convinced of it's truth and if the only reason to have believed stars are on fire is so that it makes more sense when some lunatic talks about his star-blisters I wouldnt have believed it

But noone has given any actual good reason for why gender and sex are any different, and of those who try, their only explanation for what gender suddenly means is "Your self identity"

Ok
My "gender" is a sentient latex buttplug
And you need to believe it because gender is a thing

It's unambiguously useful. Whether or not it is a correct usage of the word depends entirely on whether or not it is used that way in the language. Which it is, to the point that it's now recognized as such in dictionaries.

Gender is the state of being male, female or some variation thereof with respect to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.

You keep saying it's useful
And nothing else

Not, for instance, any way in which it is useful, only that it is
Ok

Now you say it's unambiguoously useful

uh huh
how

Gender is Sex

For sociology? Gives an extra variable we can use to track statistics in a population. Are people who experience a difference in their gender and sex more likely to suffer from certain ailments, or commit crimes, or suffer prejudice? You can't track that without distinguishing between the two, and you can't combat it without tracking it.

Psychology/Psychiatry? Aforementioned knowledge of whether they're more likely to suffer from certain ailments extends to those of the mind, too. Sure, you might say that gender dysphoria is a disease in and of itself, to which I would respond that that kind of thinking is at least just as bad. In any case, it's easier to treat someone when you're not ignoring aspects of their personality. How does this affect you? Well, it'd be better for you if there were less psychotic people wandering around, surely. An extreme example, but not the only one.

Interpersonal relationships? People are less likely to think you're a prick if you're not baselessly outright rejecting things they say about themselves. By all means, call them out if they're being attention whores, but not everyone is. Not even most people are.

Let me turn it back around on you, now. Why is gender the same as sex? Despite the fact that the English language can only be improved by adding meaning to words that were previously synonymous, despite the fact that it is a thing that people all over the place are experiencing, despite the fact that it's useful in various situations, and despite the fact that the dictionary no longer supports your definition, you say they are the same thing. Why?

Sociology:
Im not convinced of that
Not that I hold the highest regard for sociology in general but that in particular sounds like bunk to me. You have at it but Im not buying that. Especially when you frame it as the only variable by which these things can be studied, which I understand was not your intent but your focus on somehow proving this focus to be of critical importance has given you that air.

Psychology:
See above, though I have a little more faith in the field but again, this sounds like some gum-flapping. I do not buy that these things are personality aspects in the first place, specifically because I am as yet convinced that every instance of such claims is a bid for attention by vapid and delusional individuals who want to stand apart from the crowd as they are incapable of handling the idea that they are insignificant or not special.

Relationships:
Cry me a river

The reason i still thing Gender = Sex is the same reason I don't pray to a god
I've no reason to. I have yet to be convinced that it is necessary or there is any good reason to do so. I also don't believe in a spectral pink teapot that floats around in space and will determine the future of the universe based on the fashion choices of a lesbian from newyork city. What reason have I to buy into it, when the only argument for it so far as been "But you gotta!"

Youve given me some reasons yes
And they havent been very good ones, so I am not won over
Failing that I am left at square 1, people want me to believe in this thing because...
because they want me to? because it makes them feel better? because it gives them more to whine about when their super secret space gender in their head is somehow slighted?

Under more ordinary circumstances I wouldnt be so opposed, but the last several months have given me pause for thought on why I should simply accept this and that because why not. Well there is a 'why not', and it is that this shit is being used to drive peoples lives to ruin over invented slights and hurt feelings. Institutions of education being turned into stepford culdesacs of feefees and comfort, professionals stripped from their jobs and humour being stamped out.

Ofcourse this isn't everyone but these occurences have given me a reason to stop and seriously consider if I want to accept something, simply because why not?

That's my why not, and that means something which might have previously slid past on "yeah sure I cant see any problem with that I guess" now has to prove its worth being accepted, that there's a good reason to take it in.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

I don't understand.

The reasons that I have suggested don't come from inside the person accepting them. From a utilitarian perspective, it's inarguably a good thing to have sex and gender be different things. Everyone has reason to accept that, especially people who work in the previously mentioned fields.

It doesn't even make sense to say it's "on them" to have a reason to believe something. Such a reason would have to be given or found. If it's generated internally with no bearing on the real world, it's both a shit reason and not utilitarian, which is the reason I'm suggesting.

Ive as yet not been given a good reason to see it that way
The only argument I have so far been presented with, excluding your separate data point (which, not being a professional in the relevant fields means next to nothing to me) is that it would make the gibberish surrounding the "extra genders" beyond male and female make more sense

But Im not invested in making those things make more sense

Actually my argument is "Im not convinced by your weak ass argument to believe in this nonsense"

I wasn't talking about you, but you've acknowledge the point I wanted you to acknowledge. That point being that it is useful in certain fields.

How then, can you deny it's a thing? There are many things that have literally no bearing on how you act, but would be stupid to deny. The world being round -ish , for example.

The fact that you're not invested in understanding it has no bearing on whether or not it's true. I don't understand quantum superposition, and have no intention to learn about it, but that doesn't mean that I deny it's true simply because it doesn't make sense to me.

Besides which, I find it odd how you say you're not invested in understanding it, but I've seen you comment in these discussions like half a dozen times by now. Like, why involve yourself in discussions when you're not going to make the effort to inform yourself about the topic? That's sorta #Rood to everyone involved.

I can deny its a thing because I do not see those people with their reasons to see it as a thing as being an authority on the thing, or on anything outside of their field

What I mean is that
their decisions are, as yet, not relevant to me and my life
They havent yet had any reason to dictate my view on the world
So whatever use they have for it, is irrelevant to me, and so I see no reason to change how I see things to suit their uses

As for why I talk about something Im not invested in:
That's easy

I felt like it

I genuinely don't understand how you can acknowledge that it is a useful and true thing in some situations but not accept that it is a useful and true thing.

This is like saying a doctor isn't an authority on how your body works so you don't accept that you have an immune system. Or that a physicist isn't an authority on how the universe works so you don't accept the idea that stars aren't on fire. Or any other such retarded thing.

I never said it was true
I said they see it as useful
THATS what I recognize

This does not make it true

I have to be convinced of it's truth and if the only reason to have believed stars are on fire is so that it makes more sense when some lunatic talks about his star-blisters I wouldnt have believed it

But noone has given any actual good reason for why gender and sex are any different, and of those who try, their only explanation for what gender suddenly means is "Your self identity"

Ok
My "gender" is a sentient latex buttplug
And you need to believe it because gender is a thing

It's unambiguously useful. Whether or not it is a correct usage of the word depends entirely on whether or not it is used that way in the language. Which it is, to the point that it's now recognized as such in dictionaries.

Gender is the state of being male, female or some variation thereof with respect to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.

You keep saying it's useful
And nothing else

Not, for instance, any way in which it is useful, only that it is
Ok

Now you say it's unambiguoously useful

uh huh
how

Gender is Sex

For sociology? Gives an extra variable we can use to track statistics in a population. Are people who experience a difference in their gender and sex more likely to suffer from certain ailments, or commit crimes, or suffer prejudice? You can't track that without distinguishing between the two, and you can't combat it without tracking it.

Psychology/Psychiatry? Aforementioned knowledge of whether they're more likely to suffer from certain ailments extends to those of the mind, too. Sure, you might say that gender dysphoria is a disease in and of itself, to which I would respond that that kind of thinking is at least just as bad. In any case, it's easier to treat someone when you're not ignoring aspects of their personality. How does this affect you? Well, it'd be better for you if there were less psychotic people wandering around, surely. An extreme example, but not the only one.

Interpersonal relationships? People are less likely to think you're a prick if you're not baselessly outright rejecting things they say about themselves. By all means, call them out if they're being attention whores, but not everyone is. Not even most people are.

Let me turn it back around on you, now. Why is gender the same as sex? Despite the fact that the English language can only be improved by adding meaning to words that were previously synonymous, despite the fact that it is a thing that people all over the place are experiencing, despite the fact that it's useful in various situations, and despite the fact that the dictionary no longer supports your definition, you say they are the same thing. Why?

Sociology:
Im not convinced of that
Not that I hold the highest regard for sociology in general but that in particular sounds like bunk to me. You have at it but Im not buying that. Especially when you frame it as the only variable by which these things can be studied, which I understand was not your intent but your focus on somehow proving this focus to be of critical importance has given you that air.

Psychology:
See above, though I have a little more faith in the field but again, this sounds like some gum-flapping. I do not buy that these things are personality aspects in the first place, specifically because I am as yet convinced that every instance of such claims is a bid for attention by vapid and delusional individuals who want to stand apart from the crowd as they are incapable of handling the idea that they are insignificant or not special.

Relationships:
Cry me a river

The reason i still thing Gender = Sex is the same reason I don't pray to a god
I've no reason to. I have yet to be convinced that it is necessary or there is any good reason to do so. I also don't believe in a spectral pink teapot that floats around in space and will determine the future of the universe based on the fashion choices of a lesbian from newyork city. What reason have I to buy into it, when the only argument for it so far as been "But you gotta!"

Youve given me some reasons yes
And they havent been very good ones, so I am not won over
Failing that I am left at square 1, people want me to believe in this thing because...
because they want me to? because it makes them feel better? because it gives them more to whine about when their super secret space gender in their head is somehow slighted?

Under more ordinary circumstances I wouldnt be so opposed, but the last several months have given me pause for thought on why I should simply accept this and that because why not. Well there is a 'why not', and it is that this shit is being used to drive peoples lives to ruin over invented slights and hurt feelings. Institutions of education being turned into stepford culdesacs of feefees and comfort, professionals stripped from their jobs and humour being stamped out.

Ofcourse this isn't everyone but these occurences have given me a reason to stop and seriously consider if I want to accept something, simply because why not?

That's my why not, and that means something which might have previously slid past on "yeah sure I cant see any problem with that I guess" now has to prove its worth being accepted, that there's a good reason to take it in.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

So you acknowledge that it could be a thing in certain fields, but you simply have no reason to care about it?

I acknowledge that if people have reason to consider it a thing
then that's on them

I don't understand.

The reasons that I have suggested don't come from inside the person accepting them. From a utilitarian perspective, it's inarguably a good thing to have sex and gender be different things. Everyone has reason to accept that, especially people who work in the previously mentioned fields.

It doesn't even make sense to say it's "on them" to have a reason to believe something. Such a reason would have to be given or found. If it's generated internally with no bearing on the real world, it's both a shit reason and not utilitarian, which is the reason I'm suggesting.

Ive as yet not been given a good reason to see it that way
The only argument I have so far been presented with, excluding your separate data point (which, not being a professional in the relevant fields means next to nothing to me) is that it would make the gibberish surrounding the "extra genders" beyond male and female make more sense

But Im not invested in making those things make more sense

Actually my argument is "Im not convinced by your weak ass argument to believe in this nonsense"

I wasn't talking about you, but you've acknowledge the point I wanted you to acknowledge. That point being that it is useful in certain fields.

How then, can you deny it's a thing? There are many things that have literally no bearing on how you act, but would be stupid to deny. The world being round -ish , for example.

The fact that you're not invested in understanding it has no bearing on whether or not it's true. I don't understand quantum superposition, and have no intention to learn about it, but that doesn't mean that I deny it's true simply because it doesn't make sense to me.

Besides which, I find it odd how you say you're not invested in understanding it, but I've seen you comment in these discussions like half a dozen times by now. Like, why involve yourself in discussions when you're not going to make the effort to inform yourself about the topic? That's sorta #Rood to everyone involved.

I can deny its a thing because I do not see those people with their reasons to see it as a thing as being an authority on the thing, or on anything outside of their field

What I mean is that
their decisions are, as yet, not relevant to me and my life
They havent yet had any reason to dictate my view on the world
So whatever use they have for it, is irrelevant to me, and so I see no reason to change how I see things to suit their uses

As for why I talk about something Im not invested in:
That's easy

I felt like it

I genuinely don't understand how you can acknowledge that it is a useful and true thing in some situations but not accept that it is a useful and true thing.

This is like saying a doctor isn't an authority on how your body works so you don't accept that you have an immune system. Or that a physicist isn't an authority on how the universe works so you don't accept the idea that stars aren't on fire. Or any other such retarded thing.

I never said it was true
I said they see it as useful
THATS what I recognize

This does not make it true

I have to be convinced of it's truth and if the only reason to have believed stars are on fire is so that it makes more sense when some lunatic talks about his star-blisters I wouldnt have believed it

But noone has given any actual good reason for why gender and sex are any different, and of those who try, their only explanation for what gender suddenly means is "Your self identity"

Ok
My "gender" is a sentient latex buttplug
And you need to believe it because gender is a thing

It's unambiguously useful. Whether or not it is a correct usage of the word depends entirely on whether or not it is used that way in the language. Which it is, to the point that it's now recognized as such in dictionaries.

Gender is the state of being male, female or some variation thereof with respect to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.

You keep saying it's useful
And nothing else

Not, for instance, any way in which it is useful, only that it is
Ok

Now you say it's unambiguoously useful

uh huh
how

Gender is Sex

For sociology? Gives an extra variable we can use to track statistics in a population. Are people who experience a difference in their gender and sex more likely to suffer from certain ailments, or commit crimes, or suffer prejudice? You can't track that without distinguishing between the two, and you can't combat it without tracking it.

Psychology/Psychiatry? Aforementioned knowledge of whether they're more likely to suffer from certain ailments extends to those of the mind, too. Sure, you might say that gender dysphoria is a disease in and of itself, to which I would respond that that kind of thinking is at least just as bad. In any case, it's easier to treat someone when you're not ignoring aspects of their personality. How does this affect you? Well, it'd be better for you if there were less psychotic people wandering around, surely. An extreme example, but not the only one.

Interpersonal relationships? People are less likely to think you're a prick if you're not baselessly outright rejecting things they say about themselves. By all means, call them out if they're being attention whores, but not everyone is. Not even most people are.

Let me turn it back around on you, now. Why is gender the same as sex? Despite the fact that the English language can only be improved by adding meaning to words that were previously synonymous, despite the fact that it is a thing that people all over the place are experiencing, despite the fact that it's useful in various situations, and despite the fact that the dictionary no longer supports your definition, you say they are the same thing. Why?

Sociology:
Im not convinced of that
Not that I hold the highest regard for sociology in general but that in particular sounds like bunk to me. You have at it but Im not buying that. Especially when you frame it as the only variable by which these things can be studied, which I understand was not your intent but your focus on somehow proving this focus to be of critical importance has given you that air.

Psychology:
See above, though I have a little more faith in the field but again, this sounds like some gum-flapping. I do not buy that these things are personality aspects in the first place, specifically because I am as yet convinced that every instance of such claims is a bid for attention by vapid and delusional individuals who want to stand apart from the crowd as they are incapable of handling the idea that they are insignificant or not special.

Relationships:
Cry me a river

The reason i still thing Gender = Sex is the same reason I don't pray to a god
I've no reason to. I have yet to be convinced that it is necessary or there is any good reason to do so. I also don't believe in a spectral pink teapot that floats around in space and will determine the future of the universe based on the fashion choices of a lesbian from newyork city. What reason have I to buy into it, when the only argument for it so far as been "But you gotta!"

Youve given me some reasons yes
And they havent been very good ones, so I am not won over
Failing that I am left at square 1, people want me to believe in this thing because...
because they want me to? because it makes them feel better? because it gives them more to whine about when their super secret space gender in their head is somehow slighted?

Under more ordinary circumstances I wouldnt be so opposed, but the last several months have given me pause for thought on why I should simply accept this and that because why not. Well there is a 'why not', and it is that this shit is being used to drive peoples lives to ruin over invented slights and hurt feelings. Institutions of education being turned into stepford culdesacs of feefees and comfort, professionals stripped from their jobs and humour being stamped out.

Ofcourse this isn't everyone but these occurences have given me a reason to stop and seriously consider if I want to accept something, simply because why not?

That's my why not, and that means something which might have previously slid past on "yeah sure I cant see any problem with that I guess" now has to prove its worth being accepted, that there's a good reason to take it in.

Sociology:
Then you're wrong.

Psychology:
Then you're wrong.

Relationships:
Fair enough. You're not obligated to give a fuck.

Everything else:
That's ludicrous. Besides the erroneous comparisons between the actual behavior of human beings and the hypothetical possibilities of a deity, you've ignored every reason presented to you for no discernible reason.

Here's the cool thing however: Language isn't determined by the individual. Whether or not you choose to recognize it, for all the reasons I've presented and more, gender is not the same as sex. You ignoring that makes you factually incorrect. The language has evolved, like it or not.

You say so
But I dont care that you say so

So we're at an impasse there

I mean I can do it too
look

Everything else:
Youre wrong tho

Your failure is in having not presented a single reason as to why anything I have said is wrong, or why it's not enough, besides your feelings.

Lol I totally fucked that up. I meant to say they get distracted easily, not want things to be straight. Got my OCD and ADD mixed up.

Arguing is like crack to me, so on one level it was fun. On another it was fucking awful.
In my mind, that's a categorically different thing to the gender/sex thing. Gender is inherently about feelings, which is why it's really only useful in the fields where mentality is a factor. The distinction I would make about the nails is the reason. If you had long nails because of arbitrary preference, it's unrelated to gender. If you chose to keep your nails longer than usual because you are feminine, it'd be related to gender. But I agree that it in itself doesn't need a label - The gender thing is related to identity, and your identity isn't determined by a single factor. It's the sum of your parts.
They would need a label in any study or conversation, saying "The way a person feels about their sex" is both tedious and carries none of the subtext that "gender" would. For the same reason, we say "quarks" instead of "pieces of a proton"
Some people definitely do that, but it doesn't change the reality of the matter. To use an example I feel we'll agree on, the fact that some people say they have ADD or ADHD when they want things to be neat doesn't detract from whether or not those are real things. Further, I see no problem with having labels, should they be correctly applied. People seem to take issue with being labelled, I think it's a good thing provided everyone involved is smart enough to know that a label doesn't describe a persons identity in totality and the label is accurate.
Walls have arrived.

So be concerned

That you think so is your problem

That you think I'm wrong is concerning.

Welp, guess that's all folks.

why have two unique words mean the same thing? In what context is gender a better word than sex?

My argument is just that gender is not sex. Sex is the concrete thing, gender is the self identifier. What word would you use instead of gender to describe the self-identifiers we assign ourselves?

yet you're agreeing with the logic behind the masculinization and feminization of the brain at birth altering how people identify?

Allow me to clarify: what is your issue with my conclusion? You seemed to be agreeing with me. Sex is a concrete biologically determined thing while gender is label you give yourself based on the masculanization/feminization of your brain and how it influences your development.

what's the problem?

Right, sex and gender are two different things.

^_^ Sex is what you are chromosomally, and gender is what you identify as.