Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

captainfuckitall    

Rank #774 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 343 Comments: Sold Soul
Online
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#774
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  90 ,  50
Comment Thumbs: 44702 total,  55330 ,  10628
Content Level Progress: 76.27% (45/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 11.6% (116/1000)
Level 343 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 344 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:20
Content Views:9655
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14231
FJ Points:15347

latest user's comments

#27 - No it doesn't, it's still ice-cream, and it's insanity to ACTU…  [+] (18 new replies) 06/26/2014 on its kinda hot -1
#40 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
I never said it wasn't ice cream, in fact I said "it's still ice cream, but they're not the same thing' with the context of 'boys / girls being human, but still not the same.'

Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I thought you said you were done.
#43 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #44 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Yet you obviously do care about being right, because you're still here.

But hey, if you want to continue the debate, awesome. My turn.

I wasn't misunderstanding anything; I was simply affirming that there is no human who is NOT a boy or a girl; there are no more genders than the two, because there are no more XY/XX chromosome combinations; it's as simple as that, and all the hormone or genital changes in the world will not change it.

You could dress yourself up as an elf, act as an elf, and get surgery to get as many elf-life features and characteristics as possible, but it doesn't change the fact that your D.N.A is human.
#45 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, so it's been noted. You're still here because you WANT to be right, otherwise you would have left three comments ago.
#47 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Four comments ago.
User avatar #36 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
To put it into your ice cream analogy, nobody is saying that it's no longer ice cream.
You have chocolate and you have vanilla
some people like only like chocolate, some people only like vanilla - these are straights and gays
some people like both, but don't really like them mixed together - these are bisexuals
some people just like ice cream, and don't give a fuck what flavor it is - these are pansexuals.

Starting with two flavors of ice cream, you can make several distinct blends that taste very different. 75% chocolate with 25% vanilla does not taste the same as 75% vanilla with 25% chocolate, so you can't call them the exact same flavor. The blending of two flavors can create different tastes that appeal to different people.

Why are you so insistent that the world be black and white and grey does not exists?
There are thousands of shades in between the two.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand. For starters, YOU were the one operating in black and white, insisting that Pansexuals would be the only class that would consistently fuck your example; completely ignoring personal preferences between all different types of people.

Second, Indeed you can make certain distinct flavours, but that's where fetishes come from. I like women, but I PREFER women with bigger breasts, and I enjoy leggings more than I enjoy high heels. See? Other men, while straight, would totally disagree; that doesn't make them any less straight.

In any case, to your term of "not caring about the ice-cream", please see comment #24
User avatar #50 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, I didn't say every pansexual person on earth would fuck Buck, I said that any pansexual who liked buck as a person would be willing to have sex with him. That does not hold true with other sexualities because they distinguish between friendship and attraction based on other criteria, to a pansexual, being friends with someone is the basically the ONLY criteria. That makes it distinct from a bisexual who could still be friends with a guy or a girl but have no sexual attraction to them because they are not their type, they don't fit the personal preference.

In the end, this argument is pointless because there is apparently nothing anyone can say that will convince you that a transsexual or a hermaphrodite is neither a boy nor a girl, but another distinct option. Your belief is that there are only two distinct and separate options, and that the shades in between are merely matters of personal preference and not their own distinct categories. You refuse to acknowledge that sex and gender are different things, and you won't let anyone change that.

While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous, saying that there are only 2 and no more is just as ridiculous.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's ALREADY a sexual term for people who ONLY have sex with those they develop emotional attachments to, and it's not Pansexual. Whatever it is, it's still stupid though.

Because it's not. If I change my genitals and hormones to a female, I become a girl; not a third gender. Even getting BOTH hormones and genitals for whatever awful reason still wouldn't make me a third gender, it would just mean I have aspects of both created artificially (as there are no 'natural' occurrences of people with both genders that happen on a regular basis. Even the incredibly small amounts it has happened has usually happened because of extreme circumstances or complications). Just as well, nothing could convince you of MY view, so we're in the same boat, aren't we? It's just like religion. If you were an Atheist, very little would convince you of the existence of a deity outside of seeing them, and likewise, if you were religious, very little would convince you that your god was a false one, or that there were no gods at all. You're trying very hard to make me sound like this old intolerant bigot, but really we're both just opposite ends of the same extremes. We both believe something and don't WANT to believe anything else because it sounds silly to us. Simple.

Just as well, even IF gender is subjective, sex still isn't. I can believe I'm a woman all I want, but it doesn't make me one any more than believing I'm a dragon makes me a dragon. There is no third gender, and you WANTING there to be one doesn't make it so.

Very well, then let me ask. Why? What's so absurd about there only being two genders?
User avatar #55 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
1. the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

gender =/= sex
gender is not biological
all your biological arguments are invalid
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#24 - But that still just seems fucking retarded. "Oh, do you l…  [+] (11 new replies) 06/26/2014 on its kinda hot +8
User avatar #26 - thealbinoargonian (06/26/2014) [-]
buddy, i don't make the fucking definitions, I just know them.
User avatar #25 - yournewestgod (06/26/2014) [-]
We also like people that aren't set genders, like traps and transvestites.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
Putting on girly clothes doesn't make you an entirely different gender, nor does changing your genitals from one set to another, and you would be retarded if you actually believed so.
User avatar #29 - yournewestgod (06/26/2014) [-]
They point is they don't identify their birth gender as what they really are. If they look like a girl but have a dick, or look like a guy but have a cunt, it can throw some people off, pansexuals specifically don't care.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
But it doesn't make them a 'different' gender.

And regarding your "I'm indifferent to genitals" trait, see comment #24
#94 - rakoom (06/27/2014) [-]
Like it or not, gender is about associations connected with the stuff. Male, female, etc. Sex, is the physical traits. Dicks and pussy. People sometimes feel uncomfortable with what gender they're expected to be, and rather feel like a woman when they were born as a man, for example. Sometimes that's 'cause they adore the female gender so badly, that it becomes a obsession that slowly manifests and turns them mentally into a woman. And thus, their 'gender' becomes female.

It sounds fucking retarded, but it's how it works, by the book.
User avatar #98 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Awesome. STILL doesn't mean there are more genders than two.
#107 - rakoom (06/27/2014) [-]
Technicly, there is. I'm really against the "demisexual" bullcrap, but I can't help but to feel like this was how genders came to be in the first place. Sorta, but you might argue against that. Either way, it makes a vague bit of logical sense, but I'm not too well versed in either side.
#85 - superafromanxd (06/27/2014) [-]
just so you know technically speaking gender and sex arent the same thing
User avatar #64 - mrbuu (06/27/2014) [-]
okay.... its easy lets break it down to see pansexual is bisexual with more ego
bi- likes dicks/pussy/ass/breast
pan- likes dicks/pussy/ass/breast
tran is one of two breast/dick man/pussy
breast/dick/pussy/man still fits in the category of bi likes and what pansexual likes
i don't see how people who aren't pompous ass holes think pansexual and bi sexual are different.
#21 - Penut butter and chocolate is a dessert. Reces Pieces is a des…  [+] (20 new replies) 06/26/2014 on its kinda hot 0
#23 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Creating a different ice cream flavor makes it a different desert. <(' '<) It's still ice cream, and girls/boys are still human, but they're not the same. (>' ')> That'd be like saying Chocolate Cake is the same as Vanillia Cake because they're both Cake. The only similarity they have is being a cake and a lie.

And again, mixing hormones and getting different 'parts' changes what you are. It doesn't refer just to the chromosomes, because those influence your sexual 'equipment' and your hormones... Which are altered when becoming a trans, herm, or whatever you want to call it. Chopping your body up wouldn't really change what you are, since you don't get anything to replace it and it's 'technically' still part of you in some way. Not to mention the hormones are untouched.

But I'm done with this. I apologize, I just dislike it when I have to repeat myself in a discussion because my previous words were just ignored or overlooked.
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
No it doesn't, it's still ice-cream, and it's insanity to ACTUALLY believe otherwise. You're either a complete moron or would rather win than be right.

That's true, all ice-cream is dessert, but not all dessert is ice-cream. However, if the only dessert in the universe WAS a series of flavours of ice-cream, then yes, all dessert would be ice-cream. There is no human that is NOT a boy or a girl.

Holy fucking shit, this is absolutely retarded. Do you even hear yourself? "No no, getting a different set of genitals and hormones than what you started with makes you become an entirely different gender, even if you set them to, say Boy-To-Girl". I don't know what could be more sad, that you're just saying that because you don't want to lose or you're saying it because you really believe it.

That's fine, I feel the same way. Ta-ta
#40 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
I never said it wasn't ice cream, in fact I said "it's still ice cream, but they're not the same thing' with the context of 'boys / girls being human, but still not the same.'

Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I thought you said you were done.
#43 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #44 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Yet you obviously do care about being right, because you're still here.

But hey, if you want to continue the debate, awesome. My turn.

I wasn't misunderstanding anything; I was simply affirming that there is no human who is NOT a boy or a girl; there are no more genders than the two, because there are no more XY/XX chromosome combinations; it's as simple as that, and all the hormone or genital changes in the world will not change it.

You could dress yourself up as an elf, act as an elf, and get surgery to get as many elf-life features and characteristics as possible, but it doesn't change the fact that your D.N.A is human.
#45 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, so it's been noted. You're still here because you WANT to be right, otherwise you would have left three comments ago.
#47 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Four comments ago.
User avatar #36 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
To put it into your ice cream analogy, nobody is saying that it's no longer ice cream.
You have chocolate and you have vanilla
some people like only like chocolate, some people only like vanilla - these are straights and gays
some people like both, but don't really like them mixed together - these are bisexuals
some people just like ice cream, and don't give a fuck what flavor it is - these are pansexuals.

Starting with two flavors of ice cream, you can make several distinct blends that taste very different. 75% chocolate with 25% vanilla does not taste the same as 75% vanilla with 25% chocolate, so you can't call them the exact same flavor. The blending of two flavors can create different tastes that appeal to different people.

Why are you so insistent that the world be black and white and grey does not exists?
There are thousands of shades in between the two.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand. For starters, YOU were the one operating in black and white, insisting that Pansexuals would be the only class that would consistently fuck your example; completely ignoring personal preferences between all different types of people.

Second, Indeed you can make certain distinct flavours, but that's where fetishes come from. I like women, but I PREFER women with bigger breasts, and I enjoy leggings more than I enjoy high heels. See? Other men, while straight, would totally disagree; that doesn't make them any less straight.

In any case, to your term of "not caring about the ice-cream", please see comment #24
User avatar #50 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, I didn't say every pansexual person on earth would fuck Buck, I said that any pansexual who liked buck as a person would be willing to have sex with him. That does not hold true with other sexualities because they distinguish between friendship and attraction based on other criteria, to a pansexual, being friends with someone is the basically the ONLY criteria. That makes it distinct from a bisexual who could still be friends with a guy or a girl but have no sexual attraction to them because they are not their type, they don't fit the personal preference.

In the end, this argument is pointless because there is apparently nothing anyone can say that will convince you that a transsexual or a hermaphrodite is neither a boy nor a girl, but another distinct option. Your belief is that there are only two distinct and separate options, and that the shades in between are merely matters of personal preference and not their own distinct categories. You refuse to acknowledge that sex and gender are different things, and you won't let anyone change that.

While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous, saying that there are only 2 and no more is just as ridiculous.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's ALREADY a sexual term for people who ONLY have sex with those they develop emotional attachments to, and it's not Pansexual. Whatever it is, it's still stupid though.

Because it's not. If I change my genitals and hormones to a female, I become a girl; not a third gender. Even getting BOTH hormones and genitals for whatever awful reason still wouldn't make me a third gender, it would just mean I have aspects of both created artificially (as there are no 'natural' occurrences of people with both genders that happen on a regular basis. Even the incredibly small amounts it has happened has usually happened because of extreme circumstances or complications). Just as well, nothing could convince you of MY view, so we're in the same boat, aren't we? It's just like religion. If you were an Atheist, very little would convince you of the existence of a deity outside of seeing them, and likewise, if you were religious, very little would convince you that your god was a false one, or that there were no gods at all. You're trying very hard to make me sound like this old intolerant bigot, but really we're both just opposite ends of the same extremes. We both believe something and don't WANT to believe anything else because it sounds silly to us. Simple.

Just as well, even IF gender is subjective, sex still isn't. I can believe I'm a woman all I want, but it doesn't make me one any more than believing I'm a dragon makes me a dragon. There is no third gender, and you WANTING there to be one doesn't make it so.

Very well, then let me ask. Why? What's so absurd about there only being two genders?
User avatar #55 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
1. the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

gender =/= sex
gender is not biological
all your biological arguments are invalid
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#18 - But it's not wrong. 'Binary' doesn't mean "I'm born this …  [+] (23 new replies) 06/26/2014 on its kinda hot -2
#19 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Yes, it refers to 'boy' and 'girl', but those are classified by the sexual parts they have attached to their body /and/ their hormones. Trans do not have only one of the other, making them not a 'girl' or 'boy' by those definitions. I didn't say anything about 'conformable', since that is always... dumb, but hormones do effect that. Except the whole 'I'm actually a wolf' thing, or whatever. That's just mental issues.

The ice cream thing you said was pretty ironic, since mixing two flavors together actually does make it different, by name and definition. Triple Chocolate Ice Cream, 'World Class' ice cream (which is Vanillia + chocolate but tastes different because of how it's mixed), Reecees which has peanut butter and chocolate mixed in it, and would definitely not be the same if they were separated...

User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
Penut butter and chocolate is a dessert. Reces Pieces is a dessert. That's it. Mixing two flavours of ice-cream together doesn't create "NON-ICECREAM", it's just "THIS flavour of ice-cream" kinda like "Oh, I'm THIS gender".

And no it's not, it's classified by a certain set of chromosomes. Not hormones or genitalia. Chromosomes. Of which there are only two variations. Hence "Gender Binary". Get it? If it was any other way, slashing up your balls and having mental issues would classify you as a third gender, but we both know that's just ludicrous.
#23 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Creating a different ice cream flavor makes it a different desert. <(' '<) It's still ice cream, and girls/boys are still human, but they're not the same. (>' ')> That'd be like saying Chocolate Cake is the same as Vanillia Cake because they're both Cake. The only similarity they have is being a cake and a lie.

And again, mixing hormones and getting different 'parts' changes what you are. It doesn't refer just to the chromosomes, because those influence your sexual 'equipment' and your hormones... Which are altered when becoming a trans, herm, or whatever you want to call it. Chopping your body up wouldn't really change what you are, since you don't get anything to replace it and it's 'technically' still part of you in some way. Not to mention the hormones are untouched.

But I'm done with this. I apologize, I just dislike it when I have to repeat myself in a discussion because my previous words were just ignored or overlooked.
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
No it doesn't, it's still ice-cream, and it's insanity to ACTUALLY believe otherwise. You're either a complete moron or would rather win than be right.

That's true, all ice-cream is dessert, but not all dessert is ice-cream. However, if the only dessert in the universe WAS a series of flavours of ice-cream, then yes, all dessert would be ice-cream. There is no human that is NOT a boy or a girl.

Holy fucking shit, this is absolutely retarded. Do you even hear yourself? "No no, getting a different set of genitals and hormones than what you started with makes you become an entirely different gender, even if you set them to, say Boy-To-Girl". I don't know what could be more sad, that you're just saying that because you don't want to lose or you're saying it because you really believe it.

That's fine, I feel the same way. Ta-ta
#40 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
I never said it wasn't ice cream, in fact I said "it's still ice cream, but they're not the same thing' with the context of 'boys / girls being human, but still not the same.'

Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I thought you said you were done.
#43 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #44 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Yet you obviously do care about being right, because you're still here.

But hey, if you want to continue the debate, awesome. My turn.

I wasn't misunderstanding anything; I was simply affirming that there is no human who is NOT a boy or a girl; there are no more genders than the two, because there are no more XY/XX chromosome combinations; it's as simple as that, and all the hormone or genital changes in the world will not change it.

You could dress yourself up as an elf, act as an elf, and get surgery to get as many elf-life features and characteristics as possible, but it doesn't change the fact that your D.N.A is human.
#45 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, so it's been noted. You're still here because you WANT to be right, otherwise you would have left three comments ago.
#47 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Four comments ago.
User avatar #36 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
To put it into your ice cream analogy, nobody is saying that it's no longer ice cream.
You have chocolate and you have vanilla
some people like only like chocolate, some people only like vanilla - these are straights and gays
some people like both, but don't really like them mixed together - these are bisexuals
some people just like ice cream, and don't give a fuck what flavor it is - these are pansexuals.

Starting with two flavors of ice cream, you can make several distinct blends that taste very different. 75% chocolate with 25% vanilla does not taste the same as 75% vanilla with 25% chocolate, so you can't call them the exact same flavor. The blending of two flavors can create different tastes that appeal to different people.

Why are you so insistent that the world be black and white and grey does not exists?
There are thousands of shades in between the two.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand. For starters, YOU were the one operating in black and white, insisting that Pansexuals would be the only class that would consistently fuck your example; completely ignoring personal preferences between all different types of people.

Second, Indeed you can make certain distinct flavours, but that's where fetishes come from. I like women, but I PREFER women with bigger breasts, and I enjoy leggings more than I enjoy high heels. See? Other men, while straight, would totally disagree; that doesn't make them any less straight.

In any case, to your term of "not caring about the ice-cream", please see comment #24
User avatar #50 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, I didn't say every pansexual person on earth would fuck Buck, I said that any pansexual who liked buck as a person would be willing to have sex with him. That does not hold true with other sexualities because they distinguish between friendship and attraction based on other criteria, to a pansexual, being friends with someone is the basically the ONLY criteria. That makes it distinct from a bisexual who could still be friends with a guy or a girl but have no sexual attraction to them because they are not their type, they don't fit the personal preference.

In the end, this argument is pointless because there is apparently nothing anyone can say that will convince you that a transsexual or a hermaphrodite is neither a boy nor a girl, but another distinct option. Your belief is that there are only two distinct and separate options, and that the shades in between are merely matters of personal preference and not their own distinct categories. You refuse to acknowledge that sex and gender are different things, and you won't let anyone change that.

While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous, saying that there are only 2 and no more is just as ridiculous.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's ALREADY a sexual term for people who ONLY have sex with those they develop emotional attachments to, and it's not Pansexual. Whatever it is, it's still stupid though.

Because it's not. If I change my genitals and hormones to a female, I become a girl; not a third gender. Even getting BOTH hormones and genitals for whatever awful reason still wouldn't make me a third gender, it would just mean I have aspects of both created artificially (as there are no 'natural' occurrences of people with both genders that happen on a regular basis. Even the incredibly small amounts it has happened has usually happened because of extreme circumstances or complications). Just as well, nothing could convince you of MY view, so we're in the same boat, aren't we? It's just like religion. If you were an Atheist, very little would convince you of the existence of a deity outside of seeing them, and likewise, if you were religious, very little would convince you that your god was a false one, or that there were no gods at all. You're trying very hard to make me sound like this old intolerant bigot, but really we're both just opposite ends of the same extremes. We both believe something and don't WANT to believe anything else because it sounds silly to us. Simple.

Just as well, even IF gender is subjective, sex still isn't. I can believe I'm a woman all I want, but it doesn't make me one any more than believing I'm a dragon makes me a dragon. There is no third gender, and you WANTING there to be one doesn't make it so.

Very well, then let me ask. Why? What's so absurd about there only being two genders?
User avatar #55 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
1. the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

gender =/= sex
gender is not biological
all your biological arguments are invalid
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#20 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Comfortable*, rather. I don't know why it changed to that.
#8 - You'd still be bisexual though. Just because someone is transs…  [+] (29 new replies) 06/26/2014 on its kinda hot 0
#33 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
This is Buck Angel
Buck Angel has a vagina

Would a straight man have sex with Buck? No
Would a gay man have sex with Buck? No
Would a straight woman have sex with Buck? No
Would a gay woman have sex with Buck? No

Some bisexuals might, but the majority of bisexuals prefer manly men and feminine women.

This is why the term pansexual exists, because to a pansexual, the genitals are unimportant, the body type is unimportant, the personality is unimportant. If they like a person, they will have sex with them, all the other criteria that people use to exclude people from being fuckable don't apply.
User avatar #77 - hellomynameisbill (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure that a lot of gays would fuck that.
User avatar #35 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Indeed some Bisexuals might, but saying ALL Pansexuals would is a bit of a stretch too, isn't it. See, there's something called 'personal preference' and it's the same reason why a straight man is unwilling to fuck ALL women, or why a gay man is unwilling to fuck ALL men, or why a bisexual person is unwilling to fuck ALL people.

It's just just Bisexual. And all things considered, most straight women probably WOULD have sex with him, because most 'attraction' is based off of features and characteristics rather than genitals themselves.
User avatar #59 - dornarruda (06/27/2014) [-]
he meant in general as an example, obviously people have preferences, that's a given lol
#10 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Technically that's wrong, as the 'binary' means you're born a girl/guy and have nothing but those hormones and 'parts.' Trans, technically, have 'both' parts and hormones. Drags are guys that wear girl clothing, and identify themselves as 'girls' despite having male hormones, though they could have some female ones as well from a slight problem at birth, which would put them outside the 'Binary' as well.

<(' '<) Just posting it because it related to the post, though. I don't really mind/care about any of that. (>' ')>
User avatar #18 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
But it's not wrong. 'Binary' doesn't mean "I'm born this way and comfortable this way", that's 'Cis-gender'. "Binary" just refers to the two genders, or which there only IS two. Transgender only go from one to the other, or have both, but that doesn't put them outside of it any more than adding one scoop of chocolate ice-cream to one scoop of vanilla transforms it into a completely different dessert.
#19 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Yes, it refers to 'boy' and 'girl', but those are classified by the sexual parts they have attached to their body /and/ their hormones. Trans do not have only one of the other, making them not a 'girl' or 'boy' by those definitions. I didn't say anything about 'conformable', since that is always... dumb, but hormones do effect that. Except the whole 'I'm actually a wolf' thing, or whatever. That's just mental issues.

The ice cream thing you said was pretty ironic, since mixing two flavors together actually does make it different, by name and definition. Triple Chocolate Ice Cream, 'World Class' ice cream (which is Vanillia + chocolate but tastes different because of how it's mixed), Reecees which has peanut butter and chocolate mixed in it, and would definitely not be the same if they were separated...

User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
Penut butter and chocolate is a dessert. Reces Pieces is a dessert. That's it. Mixing two flavours of ice-cream together doesn't create "NON-ICECREAM", it's just "THIS flavour of ice-cream" kinda like "Oh, I'm THIS gender".

And no it's not, it's classified by a certain set of chromosomes. Not hormones or genitalia. Chromosomes. Of which there are only two variations. Hence "Gender Binary". Get it? If it was any other way, slashing up your balls and having mental issues would classify you as a third gender, but we both know that's just ludicrous.
#23 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Creating a different ice cream flavor makes it a different desert. <(' '<) It's still ice cream, and girls/boys are still human, but they're not the same. (>' ')> That'd be like saying Chocolate Cake is the same as Vanillia Cake because they're both Cake. The only similarity they have is being a cake and a lie.

And again, mixing hormones and getting different 'parts' changes what you are. It doesn't refer just to the chromosomes, because those influence your sexual 'equipment' and your hormones... Which are altered when becoming a trans, herm, or whatever you want to call it. Chopping your body up wouldn't really change what you are, since you don't get anything to replace it and it's 'technically' still part of you in some way. Not to mention the hormones are untouched.

But I'm done with this. I apologize, I just dislike it when I have to repeat myself in a discussion because my previous words were just ignored or overlooked.
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
No it doesn't, it's still ice-cream, and it's insanity to ACTUALLY believe otherwise. You're either a complete moron or would rather win than be right.

That's true, all ice-cream is dessert, but not all dessert is ice-cream. However, if the only dessert in the universe WAS a series of flavours of ice-cream, then yes, all dessert would be ice-cream. There is no human that is NOT a boy or a girl.

Holy fucking shit, this is absolutely retarded. Do you even hear yourself? "No no, getting a different set of genitals and hormones than what you started with makes you become an entirely different gender, even if you set them to, say Boy-To-Girl". I don't know what could be more sad, that you're just saying that because you don't want to lose or you're saying it because you really believe it.

That's fine, I feel the same way. Ta-ta
#40 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
I never said it wasn't ice cream, in fact I said "it's still ice cream, but they're not the same thing' with the context of 'boys / girls being human, but still not the same.'

Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I thought you said you were done.
#43 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #44 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Yet you obviously do care about being right, because you're still here.

But hey, if you want to continue the debate, awesome. My turn.

I wasn't misunderstanding anything; I was simply affirming that there is no human who is NOT a boy or a girl; there are no more genders than the two, because there are no more XY/XX chromosome combinations; it's as simple as that, and all the hormone or genital changes in the world will not change it.

You could dress yourself up as an elf, act as an elf, and get surgery to get as many elf-life features and characteristics as possible, but it doesn't change the fact that your D.N.A is human.
#45 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, so it's been noted. You're still here because you WANT to be right, otherwise you would have left three comments ago.
#47 - bluemagebrilly (06/27/2014) [-]
"Just wanted to note that, since you seemed to misunderstand. I also don't 'care' about being right, I pointed that out at the start. Thanks for showing you're barely reading what I'm saying. :\"
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Four comments ago.
User avatar #36 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
To put it into your ice cream analogy, nobody is saying that it's no longer ice cream.
You have chocolate and you have vanilla
some people like only like chocolate, some people only like vanilla - these are straights and gays
some people like both, but don't really like them mixed together - these are bisexuals
some people just like ice cream, and don't give a fuck what flavor it is - these are pansexuals.

Starting with two flavors of ice cream, you can make several distinct blends that taste very different. 75% chocolate with 25% vanilla does not taste the same as 75% vanilla with 25% chocolate, so you can't call them the exact same flavor. The blending of two flavors can create different tastes that appeal to different people.

Why are you so insistent that the world be black and white and grey does not exists?
There are thousands of shades in between the two.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand. For starters, YOU were the one operating in black and white, insisting that Pansexuals would be the only class that would consistently fuck your example; completely ignoring personal preferences between all different types of people.

Second, Indeed you can make certain distinct flavours, but that's where fetishes come from. I like women, but I PREFER women with bigger breasts, and I enjoy leggings more than I enjoy high heels. See? Other men, while straight, would totally disagree; that doesn't make them any less straight.

In any case, to your term of "not caring about the ice-cream", please see comment #24
User avatar #50 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, I didn't say every pansexual person on earth would fuck Buck, I said that any pansexual who liked buck as a person would be willing to have sex with him. That does not hold true with other sexualities because they distinguish between friendship and attraction based on other criteria, to a pansexual, being friends with someone is the basically the ONLY criteria. That makes it distinct from a bisexual who could still be friends with a guy or a girl but have no sexual attraction to them because they are not their type, they don't fit the personal preference.

In the end, this argument is pointless because there is apparently nothing anyone can say that will convince you that a transsexual or a hermaphrodite is neither a boy nor a girl, but another distinct option. Your belief is that there are only two distinct and separate options, and that the shades in between are merely matters of personal preference and not their own distinct categories. You refuse to acknowledge that sex and gender are different things, and you won't let anyone change that.

While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous, saying that there are only 2 and no more is just as ridiculous.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's ALREADY a sexual term for people who ONLY have sex with those they develop emotional attachments to, and it's not Pansexual. Whatever it is, it's still stupid though.

Because it's not. If I change my genitals and hormones to a female, I become a girl; not a third gender. Even getting BOTH hormones and genitals for whatever awful reason still wouldn't make me a third gender, it would just mean I have aspects of both created artificially (as there are no 'natural' occurrences of people with both genders that happen on a regular basis. Even the incredibly small amounts it has happened has usually happened because of extreme circumstances or complications). Just as well, nothing could convince you of MY view, so we're in the same boat, aren't we? It's just like religion. If you were an Atheist, very little would convince you of the existence of a deity outside of seeing them, and likewise, if you were religious, very little would convince you that your god was a false one, or that there were no gods at all. You're trying very hard to make me sound like this old intolerant bigot, but really we're both just opposite ends of the same extremes. We both believe something and don't WANT to believe anything else because it sounds silly to us. Simple.

Just as well, even IF gender is subjective, sex still isn't. I can believe I'm a woman all I want, but it doesn't make me one any more than believing I'm a dragon makes me a dragon. There is no third gender, and you WANTING there to be one doesn't make it so.

Very well, then let me ask. Why? What's so absurd about there only being two genders?
User avatar #55 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
1. the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

gender =/= sex
gender is not biological
all your biological arguments are invalid
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#20 - bluemagebrilly (06/26/2014) [-]
Comfortable*, rather. I don't know why it changed to that.
#7 - So...Bisexual, as being 'indifferent' to sex would just make y…  [+] (15 new replies) 06/26/2014 on its kinda hot +6
User avatar #22 - thealbinoargonian (06/26/2014) [-]
not quite. Asexual people dont want toppings at all. pansexuals will take any topping.
User avatar #76 - hellomynameisbill (06/27/2014) [-]
but if pansexuals are up for anything, doesn't that mean that pansexuals lack sexual preference altogether? does that mean that they lack a sexual standard of beauty? would they fuck animals? would they fuck me? would they fuck the most ugly creatures on gods blue earth?
User avatar #78 - thealbinoargonian (06/27/2014) [-]
OK, think of them as the exact OPPOSITE of asexual people. they aren't animal fuckers, and they probably have standards like anyone else. they don't have preference's to my knowledge.
User avatar #24 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
But that still just seems fucking retarded. "Oh, do you like my pussy?" "I don't care". Do you see where that line fails? "Pansexuals" LIKE sex, and they like sex with BOTH genders, thus they are Bisexual
User avatar #26 - thealbinoargonian (06/26/2014) [-]
buddy, i don't make the fucking definitions, I just know them.
User avatar #25 - yournewestgod (06/26/2014) [-]
We also like people that aren't set genders, like traps and transvestites.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
Putting on girly clothes doesn't make you an entirely different gender, nor does changing your genitals from one set to another, and you would be retarded if you actually believed so.
User avatar #29 - yournewestgod (06/26/2014) [-]
They point is they don't identify their birth gender as what they really are. If they look like a girl but have a dick, or look like a guy but have a cunt, it can throw some people off, pansexuals specifically don't care.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (06/26/2014) [-]
But it doesn't make them a 'different' gender.

And regarding your "I'm indifferent to genitals" trait, see comment #24
#94 - rakoom (06/27/2014) [-]
Like it or not, gender is about associations connected with the stuff. Male, female, etc. Sex, is the physical traits. Dicks and pussy. People sometimes feel uncomfortable with what gender they're expected to be, and rather feel like a woman when they were born as a man, for example. Sometimes that's 'cause they adore the female gender so badly, that it becomes a obsession that slowly manifests and turns them mentally into a woman. And thus, their 'gender' becomes female.

It sounds fucking retarded, but it's how it works, by the book.
User avatar #98 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Awesome. STILL doesn't mean there are more genders than two.
#107 - rakoom (06/27/2014) [-]
Technicly, there is. I'm really against the "demisexual" bullcrap, but I can't help but to feel like this was how genders came to be in the first place. Sorta, but you might argue against that. Either way, it makes a vague bit of logical sense, but I'm not too well versed in either side.
#85 - superafromanxd (06/27/2014) [-]
just so you know technically speaking gender and sex arent the same thing
User avatar #64 - mrbuu (06/27/2014) [-]
okay.... its easy lets break it down to see pansexual is bisexual with more ego
bi- likes dicks/pussy/ass/breast
pan- likes dicks/pussy/ass/breast
tran is one of two breast/dick man/pussy
breast/dick/pussy/man still fits in the category of bi likes and what pansexual likes
i don't see how people who aren't pompous ass holes think pansexual and bi sexual are different.
#65 - Of course they do. What many people don't understand is that w… 06/25/2014 on As a unemployed white male... 0
#37 - No one said that; but it's just retarded to believe that BEING…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/25/2014 on As a unemployed white male... 0
User avatar #64 - wliia (06/25/2014) [-]
Well no, its not retarded to believe that. I mean, slavery was a pretty good example of how being in the majority was pretty advantageous.

Biggest privilege is being born in a first world nation. Seems like everyone today has a victim complex.
User avatar #65 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2014) [-]
Of course they do. What many people don't understand is that we NEED conflict and struggle in our lives, we NEED things to suck sometimes or else it feels like our life is coming to nothing. People sympathize with the sad character and want to be them because they want others to validate their struggles, and so they LIKE going through those things when others notice, and like it even still when only they notice because it reaffirms their belief that they are the main character in their story.

When you HAVE no big enemy, big struggle, or big turmoil in your life, you simply take smaller things and completely blow them out or proportion, which is why you now have these tri-gender-pyro-foxes running around, because it validates them to suffer and be different from others.
#14 - You mean speaking in a monotone way? Ya he does that, it's bec…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/24/2014 on Description 0
#15 - captainprincess (06/24/2014) [-]
Well I meant more what he actually said. He was awfully verbose and went on at-length about how utterly indifferent he was and in just that KIND of monotone that often resembles melodramatic sadness

You know, that sort of passive-aggressive bitching that people say when they "Don't care"

The kind of thing that those who don't care don't all that often bother with.
#3 - Fun fact: In WW1, Pilots were given extra carrots with each me…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/24/2014 on I See +1
#6 - anonymous (06/24/2014) [-]
Fun fact: They did it to conceal the fact that they had radar.
#5 - adu (06/24/2014) [-]
You lied to me.
#4 - anonymous (06/24/2014) [-]
They do, but not noticeably, and over the course of decades.
#12 - How do you figure he was? As I understood it, people were bitc…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/24/2014 on Description 0
#13 - captainprincess (06/24/2014) [-]
If he was JUST explaining then he was being awfully melancholy for his indifference
User avatar #14 - captainfuckitall (06/24/2014) [-]
You mean speaking in a monotone way? Ya he does that, it's because it's apathetic, he just doesn't care about things, nothing really affects him
#15 - captainprincess (06/24/2014) [-]
Well I meant more what he actually said. He was awfully verbose and went on at-length about how utterly indifferent he was and in just that KIND of monotone that often resembles melodramatic sadness

You know, that sort of passive-aggressive bitching that people say when they "Don't care"

The kind of thing that those who don't care don't all that often bother with.
#32 - "The government can't do anything right!" 06/21/2014 on ocd +1
#2 - Wait, wait, wait, does that mean that if you wear the Invisibi…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/21/2014 on Tumblr on Harry Potter pt. 5 0
#7 - anonymous (06/21/2014) [-]
The story of the deathly hallows is metaphorical, tumblr.
#8 - anonymous (06/21/2014) [-]
Whoops, that wasn't meant to reply to you, capt'n.
#9 - In the comic, his blue penis was actually visible  [+] (1 new reply) 06/20/2014 on Description +1
#10 - youxbarstard (06/20/2014) [-]
Have you seen the motion comic?
it's only the one guy doing all the voices, seems kinda sad and weird to me.
#8 - Actually, that's one of the things that came across indirectly…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/20/2014 on Description +1
#11 - captainprincess (06/24/2014) [-]
SO why did he spend the movie bitching and whining
User avatar #12 - captainfuckitall (06/24/2014) [-]
How do you figure he was? As I understood it, people were bitching at HIM, and he was just explaining his reasoning.
#13 - captainprincess (06/24/2014) [-]
If he was JUST explaining then he was being awfully melancholy for his indifference
User avatar #14 - captainfuckitall (06/24/2014) [-]
You mean speaking in a monotone way? Ya he does that, it's because it's apathetic, he just doesn't care about things, nothing really affects him
#15 - captainprincess (06/24/2014) [-]
Well I meant more what he actually said. He was awfully verbose and went on at-length about how utterly indifferent he was and in just that KIND of monotone that often resembles melodramatic sadness

You know, that sort of passive-aggressive bitching that people say when they "Don't care"

The kind of thing that those who don't care don't all that often bother with.
#13 - The biggest problem with introverted people is that they never…  [+] (9 new replies) 06/20/2014 on Quiet +32
User avatar #46 - megashot (06/20/2014) [-]
people who say they are introverted aren't introverted
#61 - anonymous (06/20/2014) [-]
i'm not introverted. now am i introverted? or am i not introverted?
User avatar #63 - megashot (06/20/2014) [-]
now you're a faggot
#59 - thenuglife (06/20/2014) [-]
Really? Does that work for everyone?

I'm introverted...

Nope... That didn't fix it.
#45 - adamks (06/20/2014) [-]
Yeah it's like "omg im so introverted feel bad for me right?". Fucking nope, feel bad for the friends who have to put up with you.
User avatar #44 - imcharlie (06/20/2014) [-]
preach it brotha
#37 - bjornkrage (06/20/2014) [-]
just imagine this is some relatively ugly chick. That's pretty much this comic in a nutshell
#35 - blablawat (06/20/2014) [-]
Depressed underage Tumblr cunts like this don't have a damn clue what being an introvert really feels like and how painful is to fight with it everyday in a loud and extrovert glorifying world. Especially if you are an ugly dude.
User avatar #48 - badabingbadaboom (06/20/2014) [-]
Amen.
#18 - It's on my Facebook, actually; but if you are aware of the bes… 06/20/2014 on Valuable information 0
#6 - Batman really is the ultimate Mary Sue  [+] (1 new reply) 06/19/2014 on Reasons I love Batman: This -2
User avatar #33 - guardianatreyu (06/20/2014) [-]
Every DC character is.
#11 - I know this may be a bad time to say, but if people are intere…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/19/2014 on Valuable information +1
User avatar #17 - adrilazzaro (06/20/2014) [-]
link plox
User avatar #18 - captainfuckitall (06/20/2014) [-]
It's on my Facebook, actually; but if you are aware of the best time to upload on Funnyjunk, I would be happy to post all chapters
#139206 - Honestly? The best thing to do would just get used to it. To f… 06/18/2014 on Advice - love advice,... +1
#35 - Well, as any symbol, it would mean as much as you want it to. …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/17/2014 on great. 0
User avatar #36 - daentraya (06/17/2014) [-]
There is no answer, other than what you make for yourself. Donuts is a perfectly acceptable answer, so its actually quite simple. Everyone who needs an answer just have to make one
#10 - "It's not going to last forever" Speak for …  [+] (3 new replies) 06/17/2014 on great. +1
User avatar #32 - daentraya (06/17/2014) [-]
The meaning of life could be 42 for all i care. What the fucking fuck kind of relevance would that answer have to ones enjoyment of donuts
User avatar #35 - captainfuckitall (06/17/2014) [-]
Well, as any symbol, it would mean as much as you want it to. Some would love to have the answer, others don't care.
User avatar #36 - daentraya (06/17/2014) [-]
There is no answer, other than what you make for yourself. Donuts is a perfectly acceptable answer, so its actually quite simple. Everyone who needs an answer just have to make one
#16 - I'm pretty sure he doesn't CARE for women, gay marriage, or ra…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/16/2014 on awesome joker +6
User avatar #22 - asheskirata (06/16/2014) [-]
which is why he never even gave Harley the D.
#19 - This happened 6 days ago and my rage is still boiling. 06/16/2014 on Fact Comp 1# 0
#5 - >Being a teenager >Hard 06/16/2014 on Repost comp part14 0

Comments(481):

[ 481 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no fucking mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for shit",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty fucked in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
&quot;Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'.&quot; - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - anonymous (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
[ 481 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)