Upload
Login or register

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#592
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 78892 total,  96883 ,  17991
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 84.3% (843/1000)
Level 367 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 368 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10927
Total Comments Made:20812
FJ Points:40047

latest user's comments

#50 - In Canada, they HAVE to give you time off in order to cast vot… 06/26/2016 on brit +3
#35 - Not invisible, imperceptible. Systems can pick up when you're … 06/26/2016 on ForgetMeNot +13
#61 - I can't even read these because it takes, what, 30 chapters fo… 06/26/2016 on Tomo-chan wa Onnanoko! pt. 35 -2
#142730 - But what of certain lacks of proof? Such as no proof of humans…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board 0
#142731 - zlane (06/26/2016) [-]
I don't think the evidence is all on one side here. Dinosaur bones should not have carbon-14 or soft tissue if they are millions of years old, yet they do.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128113000020
Figure 8 "three osteocytes with fine filopodial processes which interconnect"
9 and 10 "intracellular organelle-like structures"
11 and 12 "the center of each Haversian system is populated by possible preserved blood products"
13 "hollow blood vessel emanating from Haversian canal. Blood vessels are flexible and pliable."
15 and 16 "possible blood products lining inner wall of hardened vessel"
7-19 "large oblate osteocytes lying on fibrillar bone matrix"

www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html
this group of creationists C14 dated various dinosaur bones to 22-39ka
#142726 - That's true, but if you find no proof of something, isn't it '…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board 0
User avatar
#142728 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
i admit there's no scientific proof of God, what i would dispute is whether evolution has been proved. i've seen the evidence, and i think all of it can be explained under creationism. genetic similarities, for instance, would be the result of God using the same template for all life
User avatar
#142730 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
But what of certain lacks of proof? Such as no proof of humans or dinosaurs living together, or the Earth being older than claimed?
#142731 - zlane (06/26/2016) [-]
I don't think the evidence is all on one side here. Dinosaur bones should not have carbon-14 or soft tissue if they are millions of years old, yet they do.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128113000020
Figure 8 "three osteocytes with fine filopodial processes which interconnect"
9 and 10 "intracellular organelle-like structures"
11 and 12 "the center of each Haversian system is populated by possible preserved blood products"
13 "hollow blood vessel emanating from Haversian canal. Blood vessels are flexible and pliable."
15 and 16 "possible blood products lining inner wall of hardened vessel"
7-19 "large oblate osteocytes lying on fibrillar bone matrix"

www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html
this group of creationists C14 dated various dinosaur bones to 22-39ka
#142725 - I figured so. I argued with him once before now with the same …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board 0
User avatar
#142727 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
i think he's genuine, but he uses tactics that he knows are dishonest.
#142722 - But what of those who dispute that fact? The vast majority of …  [+] (5 new replies) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board 0
User avatar
#142724 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
Sure, i chalk it up to science's implementation of methodological naturalism. evolution is the only game in town, so to speak, because supernatural explanations aren't allowed in science
User avatar
#142726 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
That's true, but if you find no proof of something, isn't it 'right' to focus on the fields you have found proof for? At least mainly.
User avatar
#142728 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
i admit there's no scientific proof of God, what i would dispute is whether evolution has been proved. i've seen the evidence, and i think all of it can be explained under creationism. genetic similarities, for instance, would be the result of God using the same template for all life
User avatar
#142730 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
But what of certain lacks of proof? Such as no proof of humans or dinosaurs living together, or the Earth being older than claimed?
#142731 - zlane (06/26/2016) [-]
I don't think the evidence is all on one side here. Dinosaur bones should not have carbon-14 or soft tissue if they are millions of years old, yet they do.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128113000020
Figure 8 "three osteocytes with fine filopodial processes which interconnect"
9 and 10 "intracellular organelle-like structures"
11 and 12 "the center of each Haversian system is populated by possible preserved blood products"
13 "hollow blood vessel emanating from Haversian canal. Blood vessels are flexible and pliable."
15 and 16 "possible blood products lining inner wall of hardened vessel"
7-19 "large oblate osteocytes lying on fibrillar bone matrix"

www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html
this group of creationists C14 dated various dinosaur bones to 22-39ka
#142718 - You're doing it again. I'm not going to indulge you. Goodbye.  [+] (4 new replies) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board +1
User avatar
#142723 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
He's a troll. he actually told me he just comes here to make fun of me
User avatar
#142725 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
I figured so. I argued with him once before now with the same result.

I actually think he may not be, and this is just genuinely how he strokes his ego, and he only doesn't want to admit it. It really IS depressing if this is the most someone social interaction that someone can benefit from.
User avatar
#142727 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
i think he's genuine, but he uses tactics that he knows are dishonest.
#142721 - platinumaltaria (06/25/2016) [-]
Maybe you should realise that you invite baiting by grey-knighting.
#142716 - Then what do you believe?  [+] (7 new replies) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board 0
User avatar
#142720 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
I believe life was created more-or-less in its current form somewhere between 6000-10000 years ago
User avatar
#142722 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
But what of those who dispute that fact? The vast majority of them believe in their version, and without a doubt they are educated and well learned, are they not?
User avatar
#142724 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
Sure, i chalk it up to science's implementation of methodological naturalism. evolution is the only game in town, so to speak, because supernatural explanations aren't allowed in science
User avatar
#142726 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
That's true, but if you find no proof of something, isn't it 'right' to focus on the fields you have found proof for? At least mainly.
User avatar
#142728 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
i admit there's no scientific proof of God, what i would dispute is whether evolution has been proved. i've seen the evidence, and i think all of it can be explained under creationism. genetic similarities, for instance, would be the result of God using the same template for all life
User avatar
#142730 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
But what of certain lacks of proof? Such as no proof of humans or dinosaurs living together, or the Earth being older than claimed?
#142731 - zlane (06/26/2016) [-]
I don't think the evidence is all on one side here. Dinosaur bones should not have carbon-14 or soft tissue if they are millions of years old, yet they do.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128113000020
Figure 8 "three osteocytes with fine filopodial processes which interconnect"
9 and 10 "intracellular organelle-like structures"
11 and 12 "the center of each Haversian system is populated by possible preserved blood products"
13 "hollow blood vessel emanating from Haversian canal. Blood vessels are flexible and pliable."
15 and 16 "possible blood products lining inner wall of hardened vessel"
7-19 "large oblate osteocytes lying on fibrillar bone matrix"

www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html
this group of creationists C14 dated various dinosaur bones to 22-39ka
#142713 - "He's asking for proof" "Well we're made of…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/25/2016 on Religion Board +1
User avatar
#142717 - platinumaltaria (06/25/2016) [-]
No get it right, you have to say it properly. Come on, do it with me now, "I am a moron, and will refrain from being stupid in future".

My claim was in no way radical, it is the logical conclusion of two facts, and so it makes absolutely no sense to ask for proof. It's like asking what the proof of gravity is.
User avatar
#142718 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
You're doing it again. I'm not going to indulge you. Goodbye.
User avatar
#142723 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
He's a troll. he actually told me he just comes here to make fun of me
User avatar
#142725 - captainfuckitall (06/25/2016) [-]
I figured so. I argued with him once before now with the same result.

I actually think he may not be, and this is just genuinely how he strokes his ego, and he only doesn't want to admit it. It really IS depressing if this is the most someone social interaction that someone can benefit from.
User avatar
#142727 - zlane (06/25/2016) [-]
i think he's genuine, but he uses tactics that he knows are dishonest.
#142721 - platinumaltaria (06/25/2016) [-]
Maybe you should realise that you invite baiting by grey-knighting.