Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

captainfuckitall    

Rank #457 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 342 Comments: Sold Soul
Online
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#457
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  90 ,  50
Comment Thumbs: 43945 total,  54509 ,  10564
Content Level Progress: 76.27% (45/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 52.9% (529/1000)
Level 342 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 343 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:20
Content Views:9649
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14147
FJ Points:14759

latest user's comments

#7 - 1. Seeing as how most people aren't complete pieces of … 06/14/2014 on Facepalm breaks nose +4
#5 - And then someone mistakes it for a real dildo and the rubbing …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/14/2014 on best soap ive ever seen !! +1
User avatar #9 - Zeigh (06/14/2014) [-]
It would sting and burn like a mother fucker though.
#30 - So....Is anything else wondering why Kurt Godel didn't just co… 06/14/2014 on 100 Ways to Die #3 +1
#756 - Always. I'm willing to provide anything asked of me in order t…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/13/2014 on FJ Collab Comic +2
User avatar #757 - yuvesh (06/13/2014) [-]
cool, i dont know how far we got and what still needs to be done
i guess we should all read over the project so far and see what needs to be done next
#10 - Well I'm sure the victim doesn't disagree.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/13/2014 on Tumblr has a relationship 0
#12 - anonymous (06/13/2014) [-]
I don't think the victim really has an opinion
#2 - I'm pretty sure killing them would count as breaking up. Sorry…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/12/2014 on Tumblr has a relationship +4
#6 - anonymous (06/13/2014) [-]
I disagree. Sometimes people kill because they love the person so much that they want them to stay with them forever. So it's more like marriage, since they're gonna be stuck with them always
User avatar #10 - captainfuckitall (06/13/2014) [-]
Well I'm sure the victim doesn't disagree.
#12 - anonymous (06/13/2014) [-]
I don't think the victim really has an opinion
#10 - It's gonna be awful when more people start doing it. … 06/12/2014 on Slenderman Stabbings +1
#3 - That ****** dog doing that ****** look...  [+] (1 new reply) 06/12/2014 on SHOTGUN! +27
#13 - komandantmirkoo (06/12/2014) [-]
sup m8
#25 - For those of you wondering, the anime is just a Moe twist on H…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/12/2014 on Sword +1
#43 - fargfive (06/12/2014) [-]
I thought she was Cthugha?
#20 - I'll just go to a different universe. 06/11/2014 on Be careful what you wish for 0
#107 - You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed o… 06/11/2014 on - 0
#105 - That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#103 - And now you're just splitting hairs. People are diffe…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#100 - By like-minded individuals, yes. Not by the average person. …  [+] (6 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #102 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Implying that there is one type of average person instead of a large group of specific social circles?
User avatar #103 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
And now you're just splitting hairs.

People are different, but there's not so different that they cannot work in a cohesive society. Wanna know who cannot work in a cohesive society? People who are diseased, or disabled, or lack empathy toward their fellow man. And no matter how much you try to drill it in, none of these people will ever realize what they do is wrong.

What do you think would have happened if someone told Elliot that he was wrong? That he didn't deserve women and that he had to work for the privilege? Do you think he would have listened? Do you think all it would have taken is a "dude, stop" to make him look back and realize what a fool he was? He got to that position BECAUSE he never took blame or responsibility, and there was no way in hell that telling him anything would change his mind. Why are you so desperate to avoid that fact?
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#87 - You missed the whole "Pack Animals" thing. Generally…  [+] (8 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #92 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
He, honest to goodness believed that he was in the right, and was received affirmation in that stance by mainly reddit, I believe. He was told again and again that he DESERVED women.
User avatar #100 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
By like-minded individuals, yes. Not by the average person.

There are 'sub-reddits' on Reddit where you can go in your little circle to never examine yourself and never receive Criticism. Feminists have their own place too. Everyone has their own place. Reddit also has a reputation for being full of Euphoric beta-faggots, so that's something too.

You keep missing the point. These are not 'average' people, they are a small group of people that never get out of their comfort zone or push themselves. They are never criticized or cross-examined, and that's a major problem (and also why freedom of speech must be a must).
User avatar #102 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Implying that there is one type of average person instead of a large group of specific social circles?
User avatar #103 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
And now you're just splitting hairs.

People are different, but there's not so different that they cannot work in a cohesive society. Wanna know who cannot work in a cohesive society? People who are diseased, or disabled, or lack empathy toward their fellow man. And no matter how much you try to drill it in, none of these people will ever realize what they do is wrong.

What do you think would have happened if someone told Elliot that he was wrong? That he didn't deserve women and that he had to work for the privilege? Do you think he would have listened? Do you think all it would have taken is a "dude, stop" to make him look back and realize what a fool he was? He got to that position BECAUSE he never took blame or responsibility, and there was no way in hell that telling him anything would change his mind. Why are you so desperate to avoid that fact?
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#73 - Sure they do. Instincts are pretty powerful things. Children, …  [+] (11 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #77 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Yes, a rapist is a rapist, but not teaching everyone rape is wrong will genuinly lead to people not realising rape is wrong.
User avatar #79 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Prime example: Elliot Rodgers.
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You missed the whole "Pack Animals" thing. Generally, if someone hurts others, we tend to shy away from it; and it's not because we were taught it was wrong, we just 'know' it is. Sure there are people who are indifferent or don't do much good, but they don't go out of their way to do harm either.

Ah yes, Elliot Rodgers is a prime example, because he was sexually frustrated and had mental disorders; which is, you know, something most people don't have.

Do you honestly expect crime rates to go down if we just gather all kids into an assembly and say "Don't do it"? Do you REALLY believe that? I get the ideal you're trying to achieve, I really do, but it's not going anywhere and will never go anywhere, because when someone doesn't care about the consequences their actions have on others, you cannot teach them not to do it by USING others as a nail to drive it in.

Do you HONESTLY believe that Elliot Rodgers did what he did because he 'didn't know it was wrong'? Do you think it had nothing to do with the fact that he didn't have to work for anything his entire life? That he blamed everyone else for his problems and not himself? That he refused to see faults in his actions and instead projected them onto others? He was a twisted person, not the 'average' person who WASN'T taught it was wrong.
User avatar #92 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
He, honest to goodness believed that he was in the right, and was received affirmation in that stance by mainly reddit, I believe. He was told again and again that he DESERVED women.
User avatar #100 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
By like-minded individuals, yes. Not by the average person.

There are 'sub-reddits' on Reddit where you can go in your little circle to never examine yourself and never receive Criticism. Feminists have their own place too. Everyone has their own place. Reddit also has a reputation for being full of Euphoric beta-faggots, so that's something too.

You keep missing the point. These are not 'average' people, they are a small group of people that never get out of their comfort zone or push themselves. They are never criticized or cross-examined, and that's a major problem (and also why freedom of speech must be a must).
User avatar #102 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Implying that there is one type of average person instead of a large group of specific social circles?
User avatar #103 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
And now you're just splitting hairs.

People are different, but there's not so different that they cannot work in a cohesive society. Wanna know who cannot work in a cohesive society? People who are diseased, or disabled, or lack empathy toward their fellow man. And no matter how much you try to drill it in, none of these people will ever realize what they do is wrong.

What do you think would have happened if someone told Elliot that he was wrong? That he didn't deserve women and that he had to work for the privilege? Do you think he would have listened? Do you think all it would have taken is a "dude, stop" to make him look back and realize what a fool he was? He got to that position BECAUSE he never took blame or responsibility, and there was no way in hell that telling him anything would change his mind. Why are you so desperate to avoid that fact?
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#57 - I'd teach nobody not to rape, frankly. To do otherwis…  [+] (13 new replies) 06/11/2014 on - 0
User avatar #67 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Children don't just *know* what is good and bad. For example all those raised in racist families who in turn have identified coloured people as 'evil' from a shockingly young age. It does not take much man power to teach children not to rape, not to steal, not to kill. Yes, some get through the cracks but can you imagine what would happen if we taught no one 'good' and 'bad'?

Though I do agree rape needs a definite term, I myself have one it's just difficult to prove in court.
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
Sure they do. Instincts are pretty powerful things. Children, in general, want to get along, make friends, and help others; it's true that bullying and fighting is a thing among them, but that's usually just to establish a hierarchy. We ARE pack animals, after-all.

Just as well, I was raised in a racist family; and while I never totally gave up my racist tendencies (I like the jokes and I think stereotypes are based on truth), I've grown to realize that you cannot judge someone by their race or background and have to let them decide their character for themselves. THEN you judge them. As shocking as it may be, what you are taught from a young age does not decide your life; it is how you interpret your experiences that define your character.

Children also rarely see the consequences for their actions. It's only as they get older they realize that things have a lasting effect on their lives, so you can't really make that argument. Plenty of people teach children "Taking things from others is wrong", but they still do it because they're kids. It's only as they get older and think about it more that they decide it IS wrong and they won't do it anymore.

But you're also missing one massive, critical point of all this:

Criminals don't care if what they do is right or wrong. If someone doesn't care, you can NEVER drill it into them enough. A rapist rapes because it gets him off, not because he doesn't realize it's wrong.
User avatar #77 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Yes, a rapist is a rapist, but not teaching everyone rape is wrong will genuinly lead to people not realising rape is wrong.
User avatar #79 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Prime example: Elliot Rodgers.
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You missed the whole "Pack Animals" thing. Generally, if someone hurts others, we tend to shy away from it; and it's not because we were taught it was wrong, we just 'know' it is. Sure there are people who are indifferent or don't do much good, but they don't go out of their way to do harm either.

Ah yes, Elliot Rodgers is a prime example, because he was sexually frustrated and had mental disorders; which is, you know, something most people don't have.

Do you honestly expect crime rates to go down if we just gather all kids into an assembly and say "Don't do it"? Do you REALLY believe that? I get the ideal you're trying to achieve, I really do, but it's not going anywhere and will never go anywhere, because when someone doesn't care about the consequences their actions have on others, you cannot teach them not to do it by USING others as a nail to drive it in.

Do you HONESTLY believe that Elliot Rodgers did what he did because he 'didn't know it was wrong'? Do you think it had nothing to do with the fact that he didn't have to work for anything his entire life? That he blamed everyone else for his problems and not himself? That he refused to see faults in his actions and instead projected them onto others? He was a twisted person, not the 'average' person who WASN'T taught it was wrong.
User avatar #92 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
He, honest to goodness believed that he was in the right, and was received affirmation in that stance by mainly reddit, I believe. He was told again and again that he DESERVED women.
User avatar #100 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
By like-minded individuals, yes. Not by the average person.

There are 'sub-reddits' on Reddit where you can go in your little circle to never examine yourself and never receive Criticism. Feminists have their own place too. Everyone has their own place. Reddit also has a reputation for being full of Euphoric beta-faggots, so that's something too.

You keep missing the point. These are not 'average' people, they are a small group of people that never get out of their comfort zone or push themselves. They are never criticized or cross-examined, and that's a major problem (and also why freedom of speech must be a must).
User avatar #102 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Implying that there is one type of average person instead of a large group of specific social circles?
User avatar #103 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
And now you're just splitting hairs.

People are different, but there's not so different that they cannot work in a cohesive society. Wanna know who cannot work in a cohesive society? People who are diseased, or disabled, or lack empathy toward their fellow man. And no matter how much you try to drill it in, none of these people will ever realize what they do is wrong.

What do you think would have happened if someone told Elliot that he was wrong? That he didn't deserve women and that he had to work for the privilege? Do you think he would have listened? Do you think all it would have taken is a "dude, stop" to make him look back and realize what a fool he was? He got to that position BECAUSE he never took blame or responsibility, and there was no way in hell that telling him anything would change his mind. Why are you so desperate to avoid that fact?
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
#47 - But there's a massive difference between the stigma against al… 06/11/2014 on - 0
#7 - Immortality (no death, no matter what. As in, regeneration if …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/10/2014 on Be careful what you wish for 0
User avatar #19 - lyiat (06/11/2014) [-]
Have fun when the universe goes into heat death.
User avatar #20 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
I'll just go to a different universe.
#26 - The funny thing is, many Feminists do the exact same thing …  [+] (23 new replies) 06/10/2014 on - 0
User avatar #53 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Well your choices are teach all people not to rape or teach no one not to rape. Pick one.
User avatar #153 - animationhac (06/11/2014) [-]
Women has done atrocities too... Women have raped too you know?
User avatar #157 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Please notice how I in fact said 'teach all people'. You're trying to make me a bad guy, and I'm not.
User avatar #161 - animationhac (06/11/2014) [-]
I am an equality person and I find stopping horrible things are best when trying to make both men and women truly equal and not one more superior. I want women rights as much as men's. Its getting to the point that both genders need rights so that they all can be protected. Pointing fingers at either gender will not help people get better in the long run... We need to stop that cause it will only get worse by doing so.
User avatar #163 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
The word is Egalitarian not 'equality person' aheh.

I totally agree. The only people pointing fingers are the extremists on both sides.
User avatar #164 - animationhac (06/11/2014) [-]
I know the word but saying it gets redundant. I like saying other things to relieve it. I just don't like people spreading their word cause thats as bad as saying it as yourself. Let it die and let it disappear. Otherwise finger pointing won't stop.
User avatar #166 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
There will always be extremists. Always. If we give them feminists, there will be extremist Womens Rights Activists or extremeist Egalitarians.
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
I'd teach nobody not to rape, frankly.

To do otherwise would be a waste of time, money, and man-power.

As per my argument below, if criminals could stop committing crime just by being told, it would be a far better world for everyone.

What NEEDS to happen is for people to stop advocating that rape is a 'slippery term' and nail down one definition of it, just one; and then we can have first degree or second degree versions of it.
User avatar #67 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Children don't just *know* what is good and bad. For example all those raised in racist families who in turn have identified coloured people as 'evil' from a shockingly young age. It does not take much man power to teach children not to rape, not to steal, not to kill. Yes, some get through the cracks but can you imagine what would happen if we taught no one 'good' and 'bad'?

Though I do agree rape needs a definite term, I myself have one it's just difficult to prove in court.
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
Sure they do. Instincts are pretty powerful things. Children, in general, want to get along, make friends, and help others; it's true that bullying and fighting is a thing among them, but that's usually just to establish a hierarchy. We ARE pack animals, after-all.

Just as well, I was raised in a racist family; and while I never totally gave up my racist tendencies (I like the jokes and I think stereotypes are based on truth), I've grown to realize that you cannot judge someone by their race or background and have to let them decide their character for themselves. THEN you judge them. As shocking as it may be, what you are taught from a young age does not decide your life; it is how you interpret your experiences that define your character.

Children also rarely see the consequences for their actions. It's only as they get older they realize that things have a lasting effect on their lives, so you can't really make that argument. Plenty of people teach children "Taking things from others is wrong", but they still do it because they're kids. It's only as they get older and think about it more that they decide it IS wrong and they won't do it anymore.

But you're also missing one massive, critical point of all this:

Criminals don't care if what they do is right or wrong. If someone doesn't care, you can NEVER drill it into them enough. A rapist rapes because it gets him off, not because he doesn't realize it's wrong.
User avatar #77 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Yes, a rapist is a rapist, but not teaching everyone rape is wrong will genuinly lead to people not realising rape is wrong.
User avatar #79 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Prime example: Elliot Rodgers.
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You missed the whole "Pack Animals" thing. Generally, if someone hurts others, we tend to shy away from it; and it's not because we were taught it was wrong, we just 'know' it is. Sure there are people who are indifferent or don't do much good, but they don't go out of their way to do harm either.

Ah yes, Elliot Rodgers is a prime example, because he was sexually frustrated and had mental disorders; which is, you know, something most people don't have.

Do you honestly expect crime rates to go down if we just gather all kids into an assembly and say "Don't do it"? Do you REALLY believe that? I get the ideal you're trying to achieve, I really do, but it's not going anywhere and will never go anywhere, because when someone doesn't care about the consequences their actions have on others, you cannot teach them not to do it by USING others as a nail to drive it in.

Do you HONESTLY believe that Elliot Rodgers did what he did because he 'didn't know it was wrong'? Do you think it had nothing to do with the fact that he didn't have to work for anything his entire life? That he blamed everyone else for his problems and not himself? That he refused to see faults in his actions and instead projected them onto others? He was a twisted person, not the 'average' person who WASN'T taught it was wrong.
User avatar #92 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
He, honest to goodness believed that he was in the right, and was received affirmation in that stance by mainly reddit, I believe. He was told again and again that he DESERVED women.
User avatar #100 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
By like-minded individuals, yes. Not by the average person.

There are 'sub-reddits' on Reddit where you can go in your little circle to never examine yourself and never receive Criticism. Feminists have their own place too. Everyone has their own place. Reddit also has a reputation for being full of Euphoric beta-faggots, so that's something too.

You keep missing the point. These are not 'average' people, they are a small group of people that never get out of their comfort zone or push themselves. They are never criticized or cross-examined, and that's a major problem (and also why freedom of speech must be a must).
User avatar #102 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
Implying that there is one type of average person instead of a large group of specific social circles?
User avatar #103 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
And now you're just splitting hairs.

People are different, but there's not so different that they cannot work in a cohesive society. Wanna know who cannot work in a cohesive society? People who are diseased, or disabled, or lack empathy toward their fellow man. And no matter how much you try to drill it in, none of these people will ever realize what they do is wrong.

What do you think would have happened if someone told Elliot that he was wrong? That he didn't deserve women and that he had to work for the privilege? Do you think he would have listened? Do you think all it would have taken is a "dude, stop" to make him look back and realize what a fool he was? He got to that position BECAUSE he never took blame or responsibility, and there was no way in hell that telling him anything would change his mind. Why are you so desperate to avoid that fact?
User avatar #104 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
You're doing this thing called 'changing the goalposts'. Give me an example of someone who truly did not believe they were wrong, who did not know they were wrong. I did. No ok but give me an example of an AVERAGE PERSON who did not know they were wrong. Etc etc.
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
That's...not what I asked for. At all, actually. Going through my comments you can see the exact argument I MADE was "They don't believe (or care) they're doing wrong". I never asked for an example.

My argument, this entire time, has simply been that you cannot teach people what they do is wrong if they do not care if it IS wrong.
User avatar #106 - thirdjess (06/11/2014) [-]
And my goal is to try and get you to understand my point of view, no? Through example.
User avatar #107 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
You haven't been making any example though. You just pointed out Elliot Rodgers; I'm assuming you did so in order to prove that people who are not taught that X is wrong move on to do it, but the thing is, he did not ALLOW himself to be 'taught' it was wrong. He didn't care and believed everyone else was at fault. It was a problem with the person, not the method.
User avatar #36 - curveball (06/10/2014) [-]
I get the point you're trying to make and agree with it, but it's not like you can weed out which men are rapists and which ones aren't beforehand.

It's like how the cops went to my high school a few weeks before prom to lecture us about impaired driving; they can't tell who'd do it and who wouldn't, so they tell everyone and hope it gets through to most people. They obviously know that it won't sink in for everyone, but hopefully it stops a few people.

Of course, a few people still did drive drunk that night, which goes to show that you can lecture people all you want but for many it just won't stick.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2014) [-]
But there's a massive difference between the stigma against alcohol and cars and the stigma against rape.

If it was easy enough to tell a criminal NOT to commit crime in order to make them stop, the world would be a much happier place.

Although I would still like to try the experiment, and can only see it going two ways: 1. Crime rates do not drop at all and Feminists find another way to pin it on the Patriarchy and not on their own system, or 2. They explain that rape is basically anything against a girls consent and guys become massive pussies while girls becomes bitches, resulting in extreme amounts of frustration for everyone (which, again, will be blamed on the Patriarchy)
#27 - Check comment #26 06/10/2014 on Asian Bloody Mary 0
#26 - But those legs are not attached. That's basically how…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/10/2014 on Asian Bloody Mary +1
User avatar #29 - azumeow (06/10/2014) [-]
I feel bad.

But holy shit thats even more fucked why.
#13 - I actually see more people, including media, promoting 'natura…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/10/2014 on It's true you know 0
User avatar #14 - nebuchadnezzaurus (06/10/2014) [-]
O hai there
#8 - That picture isn't of Hanako though, it's of Tek-Tek, a woman …  [+] (5 new replies) 06/10/2014 on Asian Bloody Mary +2
User avatar #15 - azumeow (06/10/2014) [-]
....bitch has legs yo.
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (06/10/2014) [-]
But those legs are not attached.

That's basically how she tricks you. She makes herself look like she's wounded (as you can see her contorted in that picture) and when you approach she leaps out and chases you.

www.google.ca/search?q=tek+tek&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=WmuXU5meNYewoQSph4GABw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=677#q=tek+tek+urban+legend&tbm=isch&imgdii=_
User avatar #29 - azumeow (06/10/2014) [-]
I feel bad.

But holy shit thats even more fucked why.
#11 - icechunk (06/10/2014) [-]
Why does that woman in the picture still have her legs then? Does Tek-Tek carry them along just for shits and giggles?
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (06/10/2014) [-]
Check comment #26
#6 - Ah, yes, I too remember how every time my teacher used to scre…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/10/2014 on Sup, bitches ! 0
#7 - micekill (06/10/2014) [-]
i was once suprised by my teacher yelling at me, since i was too focused doing the exercises on my book, she started giving a lecture and had grown tired of people not paying attention. i loved math

Comments(480):

[ 480 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, ******** , and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - anonymous (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
#437 - anonymous (07/31/2011) [-]
Lololololol mfw you block me and delete my comment because I expose that you're an ignorant dumbass
User avatar #438 to #447 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/31/2011) [-]
no, i didn't block you because you "exposed that i am an ignorant dumbass". i blocked you because i know who you are, and remembered who you are. you are thebiggestmaggot. you have a (last time i checked) profile picture of an old lady with bouncing tits in a swimsuit. and you are also a nihilist that annoyed the hell out of me last time i talked because you were ignorant, arrogant, and rude, and drove me to a place i don't like going to simply because i do not like people like you. the reason i removed the comment is because 1. it was wrong. 2. you wouldn't have listened if i told you otherwise. and 3. it was Wikipedia, and unreliable source. and, since you are against what i believe, you will logically look for a source that undermines it. and i simply don't have the patience to deal with you

that's why
[ 480 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)