x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1766
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 59726 total,  73330 ,  13604
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 81.69% (817/1000)
Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 354 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10903
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:17003
FJ Points:26049

latest user's comments

#90 - I would say not. I asked if any of them were canon and he gave…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -3
User avatar #95 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
That common pepe wasnt me. As far as "main" universe goes, new 52 is the current one. If we are going by main universe, then Infinite crisis and everything before it , is not canon. of the 9 story arcs i gave 5 where/are "main universe", the other 4 are "alternate universes"
#85 - How does it feel to have to post as Anonymous to give yourself…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -4
#92 - rajotazo (05/13/2015) [-]
Lol, you just got fuckin' schooled.
User avatar #87 - spamalope (05/13/2015) [-]
I would say you got pretty destroyed in that argument
User avatar #90 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
I would say not. I asked if any of them were canon and he gave a shoddy excuse as to why all of them were, which wouldn't be accepted by anyone in an actual debate. 'Main universe' then, I should have said, if he was so petty to split have to split hairs.
User avatar #95 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
That common pepe wasnt me. As far as "main" universe goes, new 52 is the current one. If we are going by main universe, then Infinite crisis and everything before it , is not canon. of the 9 story arcs i gave 5 where/are "main universe", the other 4 are "alternate universes"
#16 - Well sure, but I'd think rape, or lack-thereof, has less to do… 05/13/2015 on No Means No 0
#57 - And how many of these are canonical?  [+] (7 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -5
#84 - Absolute Madman (05/13/2015) [-]
lol, you just got fuckin' schooled.
User avatar #85 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
How does it feel to have to post as Anonymous to give yourself attention that you 'schooled' me?
#92 - rajotazo (05/13/2015) [-]
Lol, you just got fuckin' schooled.
User avatar #87 - spamalope (05/13/2015) [-]
I would say you got pretty destroyed in that argument
User avatar #90 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
I would say not. I asked if any of them were canon and he gave a shoddy excuse as to why all of them were, which wouldn't be accepted by anyone in an actual debate. 'Main universe' then, I should have said, if he was so petty to split have to split hairs.
User avatar #95 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
That common pepe wasnt me. As far as "main" universe goes, new 52 is the current one. If we are going by main universe, then Infinite crisis and everything before it , is not canon. of the 9 story arcs i gave 5 where/are "main universe", the other 4 are "alternate universes"
#60 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
all of them. The multiverse covers all continuities, what one author writes cannot be undone by another because the multiverse allows for everything to be canon.
#49 - "Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a charac… 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... 0
#47 - How the hell do you figure? I know fully well what a Mary-Sue …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -2
User avatar #48 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
I'm completely lost.

I described what a Mary Sue is, using only terms from inside the story of the character, and you say I'm saying they have to be called out as a Mary Sue before being one.

Then I said games and characters can be engaging in more ways that one, and you completely ignored that.

And yes, that makes him a good character. Nobody likes Joffrey, but he's inarguably a fantastic character because he's essentially perfect for what he was made for. Batman is interesting in his own way, Superman is interesting in his own way, but only one fulfills the dream of being super powerful and universally loved and that is Superman.

I also said absolutely nothing about whether or not I like either character. I called you out on using Mary Sue wrong, and you were.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
"Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in" What exactly do you mean by that? Could you BE any more vague if you tried? The only thing I got out of it was that a character had to be recognized as a Mary-Sue in the story, by other characters, and not from people outside of the universe.

Yet I didn't; there's just no universal 'interest' level things can be judged by.

Yet Batman never loses and wins every argument/fight he has with Superman.

Except I wasn't. A 'Mary-Sue' is just a 'perfect character', and due to Batman having plot armour out of the ass, he would reach that definition more than Superman would, who is challenged and beaten from time to time. Batman just wins at everything.
#44 - If people dying and allies turning evil is all it takes to los…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -5
#56 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
Dark Knight Returns(broken ribs, broken battle armor, gets burried alive as a part of his plan, has to go into hiding after), Batman:Hush(breaks his hand punching superman after being a street thug for a time), Superman:Red Son(dies) , Tower of Babel(Years of planing on how to stop a rogue superman/justice league down the drain on top of his specialised kryptonite not working the way it was meant to), Superman/Batman #2(future superman comes almost kills bruce but is stopped by present-day supes), Lex Luthor:Man of Steel(defeated even after prep time and all those theoretical plans of his to stop a rogue superman), Superman: King of the world(batman nearly has his windpipe permanantly sealed before Green lantern and Martian manhunter intervene), Superman:Sacrifice(batman is nearly beaten to death by superman), Inifinite Crisis(his only defence against Kal-L is a kryptonite ring that Kal-El gave him, one which Kal-El used to fight other Supermensch.
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
And how many of these are canonical?
#84 - Absolute Madman (05/13/2015) [-]
lol, you just got fuckin' schooled.
User avatar #85 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
How does it feel to have to post as Anonymous to give yourself attention that you 'schooled' me?
#92 - rajotazo (05/13/2015) [-]
Lol, you just got fuckin' schooled.
User avatar #87 - spamalope (05/13/2015) [-]
I would say you got pretty destroyed in that argument
User avatar #90 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
I would say not. I asked if any of them were canon and he gave a shoddy excuse as to why all of them were, which wouldn't be accepted by anyone in an actual debate. 'Main universe' then, I should have said, if he was so petty to split have to split hairs.
User avatar #95 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
That common pepe wasnt me. As far as "main" universe goes, new 52 is the current one. If we are going by main universe, then Infinite crisis and everything before it , is not canon. of the 9 story arcs i gave 5 where/are "main universe", the other 4 are "alternate universes"
#60 - zerosonaku (05/13/2015) [-]
all of them. The multiverse covers all continuities, what one author writes cannot be undone by another because the multiverse allows for everything to be canon.
#43 - 'His' universe, being the key-word. In Superman's universe he'…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -1
User avatar #46 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
What? No, Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in, otherwise criticizing a character for being a Mary Sue simply wouldn't make sense.

A Mary Sue is characterized by being a self insertion of the author or a proxy for wish fulfillment, generally being super powerful and universally loved. It can be other types of wish fulfillment, but unless you're specifying, "Mary Sue" is exemplified by Superman.

As for Painkiller, it did win awards, including "Game of the year" by PC Gamer. Yes, interesting makes a good character. A character can be interesting by other means and a game can be engaging in different ways, but a fun game is a good game and an interesting character is a good character.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
How the hell do you figure? I know fully well what a Mary-Sue is, it's just a character who's perfect, but you're arguing that a character should be CALLED OUT as a Mary-Sue before they are actually deemed one.

Generally, but not always. I'm sure you've met quite a few people who revel in the idea of making sacrifices and being hated because they can 'take it'.

Oh, I only played it on console. Eh, then you and I just have different standards, just like different people may have differing standards over what's interesting, or what's good as a whole. Funny how that works, eh? I don't find Batman interesting in the slightest, you do, so is he a good character or not?
User avatar #48 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
I'm completely lost.

I described what a Mary Sue is, using only terms from inside the story of the character, and you say I'm saying they have to be called out as a Mary Sue before being one.

Then I said games and characters can be engaging in more ways that one, and you completely ignored that.

And yes, that makes him a good character. Nobody likes Joffrey, but he's inarguably a fantastic character because he's essentially perfect for what he was made for. Batman is interesting in his own way, Superman is interesting in his own way, but only one fulfills the dream of being super powerful and universally loved and that is Superman.

I also said absolutely nothing about whether or not I like either character. I called you out on using Mary Sue wrong, and you were.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
"Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in" What exactly do you mean by that? Could you BE any more vague if you tried? The only thing I got out of it was that a character had to be recognized as a Mary-Sue in the story, by other characters, and not from people outside of the universe.

Yet I didn't; there's just no universal 'interest' level things can be judged by.

Yet Batman never loses and wins every argument/fight he has with Superman.

Except I wasn't. A 'Mary-Sue' is just a 'perfect character', and due to Batman having plot armour out of the ass, he would reach that definition more than Superman would, who is challenged and beaten from time to time. Batman just wins at everything.
#42 - And are you saying that all it takes to make something good is… 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -1
#34 - People who say Superman isn't smart have read absolutely zero …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... 0
#38 - kanedam (05/13/2015) [-]
you all tend to forget that the whole storyline of batman and superman simply has logical flaws and is inconsistent...
#33 - I'd more pass it off as Fact, actually. Batman has become the … 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -3
#32 - Mhmm, that's exactly what I mean. Whenever it comes to Superma… 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... 0
#30 - Interesting =/= good. Besides, you say that as if Bat…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... -1
User avatar #41 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
Not quite, I get the point you're making but to be a Mary-Sue you have to be loved by everyone, and Batman's been painted in a negative light to the average citizen of his universe recently.

Also, I would argue that interesting = good. The point is to make the reader interested. It's like saying the point of games isn't to be fun.
User avatar #43 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
'His' universe, being the key-word. In Superman's universe he's not a Mary-Sue either, because he faces off against things often stronger than himself. We judge a Mary-Sue by outside standards, dig it?

Like I said to the anon below, something being interesting is ALL it takes to make it good? Nothing else factors in it? Come on now. Likewise, Pain-Killer is an extremely fun game, but that doesn't mean it's 'good'. Its storyline is shit, its environments are shit, its monsters are shit, the character is shit, the only good part is the weapons and exactly how they devastate the monsters around you. It's extremely fun, but it's on no way to win any awards, nor does it actually make an impact on you, the player, outside of the game.
User avatar #46 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
What? No, Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in, otherwise criticizing a character for being a Mary Sue simply wouldn't make sense.

A Mary Sue is characterized by being a self insertion of the author or a proxy for wish fulfillment, generally being super powerful and universally loved. It can be other types of wish fulfillment, but unless you're specifying, "Mary Sue" is exemplified by Superman.

As for Painkiller, it did win awards, including "Game of the year" by PC Gamer. Yes, interesting makes a good character. A character can be interesting by other means and a game can be engaging in different ways, but a fun game is a good game and an interesting character is a good character.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
How the hell do you figure? I know fully well what a Mary-Sue is, it's just a character who's perfect, but you're arguing that a character should be CALLED OUT as a Mary-Sue before they are actually deemed one.

Generally, but not always. I'm sure you've met quite a few people who revel in the idea of making sacrifices and being hated because they can 'take it'.

Oh, I only played it on console. Eh, then you and I just have different standards, just like different people may have differing standards over what's interesting, or what's good as a whole. Funny how that works, eh? I don't find Batman interesting in the slightest, you do, so is he a good character or not?
User avatar #48 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
I'm completely lost.

I described what a Mary Sue is, using only terms from inside the story of the character, and you say I'm saying they have to be called out as a Mary Sue before being one.

Then I said games and characters can be engaging in more ways that one, and you completely ignored that.

And yes, that makes him a good character. Nobody likes Joffrey, but he's inarguably a fantastic character because he's essentially perfect for what he was made for. Batman is interesting in his own way, Superman is interesting in his own way, but only one fulfills the dream of being super powerful and universally loved and that is Superman.

I also said absolutely nothing about whether or not I like either character. I called you out on using Mary Sue wrong, and you were.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
"Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in" What exactly do you mean by that? Could you BE any more vague if you tried? The only thing I got out of it was that a character had to be recognized as a Mary-Sue in the story, by other characters, and not from people outside of the universe.

Yet I didn't; there's just no universal 'interest' level things can be judged by.

Yet Batman never loses and wins every argument/fight he has with Superman.

Except I wasn't. A 'Mary-Sue' is just a 'perfect character', and due to Batman having plot armour out of the ass, he would reach that definition more than Superman would, who is challenged and beaten from time to time. Batman just wins at everything.
#40 - Absolute Madman (05/13/2015) [-]
I'm sorry but was your argument just now to say that something that is actually INTERESTING doesn't make it good?

Let me guess, the people who SUCK at making characters and stories are the BETTER comic artists because they understand that people aren't looking for INTERESTING they want SIMPLE AND COOL with a pre-set story of "Bad Vs. Good guy, Good guy Wins because he Good"

I'm sorry but could you just stick to reading See Spot Run if that's what you want
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
And are you saying that all it takes to make something good is your interest in it?
#41 - Don't judge me.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/13/2015 on Baby Tree +20
User avatar #60 - mcmental (05/13/2015) [-]
Well your name certainly says it all.
#38 - What the hell is this gif and where does it come from?  [+] (4 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Baby Tree +1
#63 - dreadric (05/13/2015) [-]
the character is Cyan from Nemi.
#39 - Absolute Madman (05/13/2015) [-]
Trying to fap?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
Don't judge me.
User avatar #60 - mcmental (05/13/2015) [-]
Well your name certainly says it all.
#11 - "Check it out! Batman and Superman are versing eachother …  [+] (15 new replies) 05/13/2015 on Batman putting superman in... +2
#51 - somekindofname (05/13/2015) [-]
Read Endgame. Seriously, and disregard the Batman vs. JL issue. Just take it as a Joker vs Batman thing and you'll see the potential of Batmans character if this was his finale. It isn't but I can dream, no?
User avatar #31 - xankon (05/13/2015) [-]
Well, it´s your opinion i respect that.
User avatar #33 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
I'd more pass it off as Fact, actually. Batman has become the very thing that people claim makes Superman boring. He became a Mary Sue who's perfect and never loses.
#29 - UnoSkullmanx (05/13/2015) [-]
I find batman to be somewhat boring these days. There's no suspense with his character because I know he's going to win. The attributes of his enemy aren't relevant at all because lolbatman. I would be shocked if Batman loses in his new movie; that would actually thrill me and make me think, "Gee, that's something I haven't seen in a while!" Batman losing to Bane that one (and I mean ONE) time hardly counts because that was an extreme situation.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
Mhmm, that's exactly what I mean. Whenever it comes to Superman Vs. Batman, the greatest default argument is "Superman is boring because he can do anything", almost as if Batman fans have NEVER read a Batman comic because he does literally anything he puts his mind to. That's exactly WHY he's a boring, uninteresting, flat character that hasn't developed in 70 years; because he never loses. Anything. Ever. And when he does it's in extreme circumstances as you said, and then he gets better and wins again in, I don't know, a week in comic time.
#24 - Absolute Madman (05/13/2015) [-]
"A guy who is super smart and uses gadgets and his wit is a worse hero than someone who can do literally anything and has no interesting limitations."

Superman is boring. Sometimes he gets good writers, but his powers are also always scaled way the fuck back when anything interesting happens with him.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
Interesting =/= good.

Besides, you say that as if Batman actually IS interesting. He's not. He wins every fight and is the best at everything he does. You do realize that Batman can do literally anything and his fanboys will defend it, right? You realize Batman has no (realistic) limitations, I mean, his god damn spine 'got better' after being snapped in half. The ONLY time he even requires assistance is when his OWN writers 'scale him back', and even then it's usually just in a charming way, like him not being able to fly and needing a lift.

You're defending Batman over being the exact same thing Superman was meant to be, a Mary-Sue. Congratulations.
User avatar #41 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
Not quite, I get the point you're making but to be a Mary-Sue you have to be loved by everyone, and Batman's been painted in a negative light to the average citizen of his universe recently.

Also, I would argue that interesting = good. The point is to make the reader interested. It's like saying the point of games isn't to be fun.
User avatar #43 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
'His' universe, being the key-word. In Superman's universe he's not a Mary-Sue either, because he faces off against things often stronger than himself. We judge a Mary-Sue by outside standards, dig it?

Like I said to the anon below, something being interesting is ALL it takes to make it good? Nothing else factors in it? Come on now. Likewise, Pain-Killer is an extremely fun game, but that doesn't mean it's 'good'. Its storyline is shit, its environments are shit, its monsters are shit, the character is shit, the only good part is the weapons and exactly how they devastate the monsters around you. It's extremely fun, but it's on no way to win any awards, nor does it actually make an impact on you, the player, outside of the game.
User avatar #46 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
What? No, Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in, otherwise criticizing a character for being a Mary Sue simply wouldn't make sense.

A Mary Sue is characterized by being a self insertion of the author or a proxy for wish fulfillment, generally being super powerful and universally loved. It can be other types of wish fulfillment, but unless you're specifying, "Mary Sue" is exemplified by Superman.

As for Painkiller, it did win awards, including "Game of the year" by PC Gamer. Yes, interesting makes a good character. A character can be interesting by other means and a game can be engaging in different ways, but a fun game is a good game and an interesting character is a good character.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
How the hell do you figure? I know fully well what a Mary-Sue is, it's just a character who's perfect, but you're arguing that a character should be CALLED OUT as a Mary-Sue before they are actually deemed one.

Generally, but not always. I'm sure you've met quite a few people who revel in the idea of making sacrifices and being hated because they can 'take it'.

Oh, I only played it on console. Eh, then you and I just have different standards, just like different people may have differing standards over what's interesting, or what's good as a whole. Funny how that works, eh? I don't find Batman interesting in the slightest, you do, so is he a good character or not?
User avatar #48 - ninjaroo (05/13/2015) [-]
I'm completely lost.

I described what a Mary Sue is, using only terms from inside the story of the character, and you say I'm saying they have to be called out as a Mary Sue before being one.

Then I said games and characters can be engaging in more ways that one, and you completely ignored that.

And yes, that makes him a good character. Nobody likes Joffrey, but he's inarguably a fantastic character because he's essentially perfect for what he was made for. Batman is interesting in his own way, Superman is interesting in his own way, but only one fulfills the dream of being super powerful and universally loved and that is Superman.

I also said absolutely nothing about whether or not I like either character. I called you out on using Mary Sue wrong, and you were.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
"Mary Sue is a type of character. Whether or not a character is a Mary Sue is entirely dependent on the story they're in" What exactly do you mean by that? Could you BE any more vague if you tried? The only thing I got out of it was that a character had to be recognized as a Mary-Sue in the story, by other characters, and not from people outside of the universe.

Yet I didn't; there's just no universal 'interest' level things can be judged by.

Yet Batman never loses and wins every argument/fight he has with Superman.

Except I wasn't. A 'Mary-Sue' is just a 'perfect character', and due to Batman having plot armour out of the ass, he would reach that definition more than Superman would, who is challenged and beaten from time to time. Batman just wins at everything.
#40 - Absolute Madman (05/13/2015) [-]
I'm sorry but was your argument just now to say that something that is actually INTERESTING doesn't make it good?

Let me guess, the people who SUCK at making characters and stories are the BETTER comic artists because they understand that people aren't looking for INTERESTING they want SIMPLE AND COOL with a pre-set story of "Bad Vs. Good guy, Good guy Wins because he Good"

I'm sorry but could you just stick to reading See Spot Run if that's what you want
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (05/13/2015) [-]
And are you saying that all it takes to make something good is your interest in it?
#4 - Considering that the Grudge Woman is my worst fear, I'd have a… 05/13/2015 on Grudge girl +6
#65 - I like how that first poster pretends their generalization was… 05/13/2015 on Tumblr Comp +1
#56 - I'm almost happy that Funnyjunk is full of so many sluts. 05/12/2015 on Healers +1
#14 - That's my favourite response to these sort of people … 05/11/2015 on That has got to sting +38
#69 - "If you are to strike someone, strike so hard that you ne… 05/11/2015 on Fockin cunt. +5
#171 - May your bacon never burn and your political sketches never be…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/10/2015 on Draw with Funny Junk +1
User avatar #172 - mizzdepp (05/10/2015) [-]
Haha thank you !
#165 - I gotta say, razlman; I think I just may wanna **** tha…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/10/2015 on Draw with Funny Junk +2
User avatar #167 - mizzdepp (05/10/2015) [-]
Well you have my permission !
remember to use protection.. or els.. papercuts
User avatar #171 - captainfuckitall (05/10/2015) [-]
May your bacon never burn and your political sketches never become as Ben Garrisons'
User avatar #172 - mizzdepp (05/10/2015) [-]
Haha thank you !
#160 - Why the **** do you look like you just came out of Slytherin? 05/10/2015 on Draw with Funny Junk +11
#16 - How does it feel to be so bored and alone that you have to mak… 05/10/2015 on Depression is quiet +8

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - Absolute Madman (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - Absolute Madman (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - Absolute Madman (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)