Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

captainfuckitall    

Rank #277 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 346 Comments: Sold Soul
Offline
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#277
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 34 total,  90 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 49482 total,  60524 ,  11042
Content Level Progress: 66.1% (39/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 62.4% (624/1000)
Level 346 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 347 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:21
Content Views:9689
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14833
FJ Points:18849

latest user's comments

#6 - This has gone from: "Leaving gore pictures on websites&qu…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/20/2014 on 4Chan is kill +60
User avatar #87 - undeadwill (09/20/2014) [-]
Well who wants to be the first?
User avatar #72 - klina (09/20/2014) [-]
Remember the "virgin" mary?
#41 - autoxx (09/20/2014) [-]
I'd be willing to bet she was sucking more than just the 5 cocks, the rest of her diet just wasn't as well connected as the 5 guys.
#29 - namelessjoe (09/20/2014) [-]
It was 5 too many cocks
#23 - She certainly was, young man. If she wasn't such a bitch, perh…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/20/2014 on Simplicity of Design +1
User avatar #24 - atomschlumpf (09/20/2014) [-]
I mostly agree with Superman, too. But I think without Wonder Woman the whole thing wouldn't have gone down the drain Just because she wants to fuck Supes, too
#17 - Yes, we can both agree on that I think. Although to me, Superm…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/20/2014 on Simplicity of Design +1
#90 - mr skeltal (09/20/2014) [-]
superman didnt change shit, he just forced everyone to stop. If superman was gone, it would go back to the way it was, he did not create lasting change
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Bullshit, he created an army and an empire.
#16 - That's just it, though. To me, that kind of mindset is absolut…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/20/2014 on Simplicity of Design +1
User avatar #20 - hotspace (09/20/2014) [-]
I see what you're saying, but to me, the idea that after all the trauma that these villains caused not only the world, but the heroes themselves and that the heroes still never kills them, is an amazing concept to me. Also, it's almost never the heroes fault that they escape, it's the corruption within the prisons that allows people to bust them out, like when Bane took over Arkham. As horrible as the situation becomes, the hero never goes against their beliefs. "A man has to have a code" I don't know man, to me I probably wouldn't be able to not kill going through what the villains do either, but that's why I like the heroes that don't, it's amazing their ability to stay true to what they believe.
#4 - We can't all have a happy ending, anon; has awful as that is. …  [+] (2 new replies) 09/19/2014 on anon accidentally... 0
#6 - karvarausku (09/20/2014) [-]
**karvarausku rolled image** what if the happy times for other is to make other suffer even more?
User avatar #8 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Then you kill them!
#13 - But what's a hero worth if they change nothing? It's no differ…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/19/2014 on Simplicity of Design +1
User avatar #14 - hotspace (09/19/2014) [-]
I see where you're coming from. However, almost all villains are captured and sent to a prison of some sort, at some point during their reign. In a sense, Superheroes are bounty hunters and the courts decide not to kill them. Superheroes tend to hold themselves to a higher standard and to them, a higher standard would be an abhorrence towards killing.

Any superhero can kill and all of them think about it, but they don't, even if they are like wonder woman and trained in war. They do all they can not to kill because it isn't their place. I tend to dislike characters who do kill more because then everything they do because morally ambiguous. It's probably not realistic to paint them like that, but they become too dark in comics.

Also, I do agree that they could have made the new Justice league less brutal and made the story a lot more interesting, if they allowed the reader themselves to decide who they believed was right instead of shoving batman's side down their throats.
User avatar #16 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
That's just it, though. To me, that kind of mindset is absolutely absurd. I could NEVER let innocent people die and evil people live because "I represent goodness and righteousness. It is not my place. I must be a shining example" simply because I wouldn't have the heart to stand in front of a crowd and give that reason as to why I let a serial-killing mass-murderer escape for the 50th time only to blow up New York. It's just absolute insanity, and I always got the feeling that heroes didn't kill people only because they didn't have the heart to do it and any type of 'moral righteousness' was just bullshit they spewed to justify their inefficiency (which is also why I hate Batman the most).
User avatar #20 - hotspace (09/20/2014) [-]
I see what you're saying, but to me, the idea that after all the trauma that these villains caused not only the world, but the heroes themselves and that the heroes still never kills them, is an amazing concept to me. Also, it's almost never the heroes fault that they escape, it's the corruption within the prisons that allows people to bust them out, like when Bane took over Arkham. As horrible as the situation becomes, the hero never goes against their beliefs. "A man has to have a code" I don't know man, to me I probably wouldn't be able to not kill going through what the villains do either, but that's why I like the heroes that don't, it's amazing their ability to stay true to what they believe.
#7 - Because I don't know if I can post this in SFW 09/19/2014 on Doctor OC comic 0
#3 - Ya...ya...no. My mother taught me never to get into a car with… 09/19/2014 on Gold Diggers! +15
#11 - I honestly agreed with Superman through most of this comic, an…  [+] (52 new replies) 09/19/2014 on Simplicity of Design -9
#77 - rufflezrgood (09/20/2014) [-]
It's sort of a, "If they start, when do they stop?" type of thing. Superman killed the Joker. Then he was willing to kill thousands of aliens. All this to defend the people. Then, when the people rise up against him, he kills them. To defend them. Since he killed the Joker, Superman's view of who it was and wasn't okay for him to kill became somewhat distorted. He became willing to kill anyone who got in his way, even if it was someone he once called a friend.
This is an actual spoiler right here, just in case if you haven't read the latest Injustice comics. The only reason he didn't kill Black Canary earlier was because she was pregnant. Now that he has the Fear ring, he's only going to get worse.
User avatar #81 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
So? Frankly, you have to do what you have to do for what you think is right; including going to any and all extremes. If you really want to play it that way, by just killing the Joker sooner, ANY hero killing him, you know, one of the worst criminals of all time, ALL of this would have been avoided.

The killing of the Joker was justified, the killing of the aliens was justified, the killing of every supervillain and criminal has been justified BECAUSE they were evil and did bad things; even the lifting of Atlantis was justified, because Aquaman needed to know he couldn't intimidate the world like that and he met with forces beyond his control. The ONLY thing I think Superman went a bit overboard with was when he killed Green Arrow, but holy fuck, even THAT could have been avoided if only Green Arrow hadn't fucking attacked him. Don't you see? Literally every action Superman has taken in the comic has simply been a REACTION of people trying to stop him. The more people do to try and hurt/stop him, the harder he tries to make it right. All in all, Batman's only making it much worse.
#86 - rufflezrgood (09/20/2014) [-]
I understand that, but look at what Superman's new defense force is doing to people. He's set up a curfew and everything. He is pretty much running their lives. I get that he is trying to help, but people don't like being controlled. What is he going to do when the unavoidable rebellion occurs? He can't very well kill everyone he is trying to protect. I just think that he'll have trouble drawing a line. If you played or at least read the story of the Injustice game, you saw what Superman did to Billy for disagreeing with him. He's eventually going to drive everyone who believed in his ideals away from him. It's unavoidable.
And Green Arrow didn't try to attack Superman for the purpose of attacking him. There was a massive misunderstanding, and Superman thought Batman was trying to hurt his parents. Green Arrow was just trying to cover everyone else's escape. Had Superman been less quick to assume, things would have gone very differently.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Toosexyforyou is correct. I've only read so far as when Alfred kicks the shit out of Superman; but so far, everything Superman has done has STILL just been a reaction based on the actions people take against him. There is literally nothing he's done to abuse his power or be evil on his own accord; every act of evil has been a response to a (even just perceived) greater evil.
User avatar #88 - toosexyforyou (09/20/2014) [-]
The curfew was also a reaction to Batman's shit so literally everything else you said is just now invalid since you can't come up with a single example of Superman abusing his power without involvement from Batman.

Also, "had Superman been less quick to assume" I don't even understand how you could possibly shift it on Superman assuming here. "Psychopath with weapons show up at my house that's being watched by my parents while I'm not there" I think that we can safely assume they're about to have tea and biscuits.
User avatar #65 - toosexyforyou (09/20/2014) [-]
Completely agreed. Shame to see all the Batman fanboys thumbing you down. If you've read the comic so far and you don't think Batman's a huge bitch then you're stupid as fuck.
User avatar #79 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
It's fine. I've come to accept that Batman fanboys will think I'm wrong no matter how I put it
#89 - mr skeltal (09/20/2014) [-]
calling anyone who disagrees with you a fanboy isn't really helping your cause
User avatar #94 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anyone who disagrees with me is a fanboy. I'm saying that in nearly every conversation or debate I had where I supported anyone BUT Batman, fans tried to claw at my ass screaming "But muh Batman intellegunce. Muh Batman gajuts" as if either of those things make him undefeatable. So I've just grown used to it.
User avatar #61 - penileburglar (09/20/2014) [-]
The point is that everyone *thinks* their morals are the correct ones.

The difference between being a good guy and a bad guy is whether or not you put those morals over someone else's life.

Batman certainly takes it too far to the opposite extreme, given that he'll put himself (and other people) in immediate danger to non-lethally apprehend supervillians. The implication has always been that he knows himself well enough to know things would get pretty bad if he let himself go down that road.
User avatar #72 - toosexyforyou (09/20/2014) [-]
The point of what? The comics? The point of the comics is definitely not that both heroes are in the wrong to the extremes because it clearly portrays Batman as the good guy and Superman as the bad guy.
User avatar #91 - penileburglar (09/20/2014) [-]
I didn't say both heroes were in the wrong. I pretty clearly said that Supes was in the wrong and that Batman, while taking it too far the other way, is still in the right. I don't think you actually read what I wrote.

The 'point' was the point the comics were making--that obviously everyone believes in their own views on morality, but not everyone's view on morality can be correct, nor is it immune to corruption, which is why the 'no killing, no exceptions' rule is held so close to many heroes.
User avatar #93 - toosexyforyou (09/20/2014) [-]
If not everyone's view on morality can be correct then how the fuck do you think you're making sense by saying that Batman's view on morality is correct, you dipshit?
User avatar #100 - penileburglar (09/20/2014) [-]
...First, I literally said not everyone's view on morality can be correct, that doesn't mean no one CAN be correct.

Second, the point is that if you're saving lives and not killing anybody, then you know you're doing good. If you're willing to sacrifice lives, you're only doing good if your morality does turn out to be completely infallible.

Third, when you have to resort to calling someone a 'dipshit' for not having the same opinion on a comic book as you, you become the kind of person who's not really worth having a conversation with. Have a good one, bro.
User avatar #101 - toosexyforyou (09/20/2014) [-]
Opinion? What? You contradicting yourself isn't an opinion, dipshit. How do you figure that Batman's morals are good. When he lets a bad guy live, he's putting other people's lives in danger. There is no 1 true way of correct morality.
User avatar #85 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Which is a massive failing on the comics' fault, might I add. It would have been MUCH more interesting on an ethical and philosophical perspective if they let the reader decide who was right and who was not. Unfortunately, it's made very obvious which side the author wants you to choose.
User avatar #60 - Riukanojutsu (09/20/2014) [-]
>dat spoiler
its like you missed the entire point of the thing on purpose
User avatar #78 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
What point would that be?
User avatar #80 - Riukanojutsu (09/20/2014) [-]
Batman fears that superman will stop being a hero and start being a villain because hes forgot his principles. Which he then proceeds to do.

Batman is all about ideology and principles. Its not that hard to see. Hes against killing because he beleives not killing is the diference between good guys and bad guys.
User avatar #82 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
See spoiler in comment #81. Batman is also one of the biggest pansy asses to exist in comics. He's willing to let millions of people die just so everyone knows his moral righteousness is intact. That's not the behaviour of a hero, that's the behaviour of a Sociopath and a Narcissist.
User avatar #87 - Riukanojutsu (09/20/2014) [-]
Its not about his mental righteousness but superman's
and hes right. superman does go uberevil.
I mean fuck, he joins the sinestro corps
User avatar #95 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Sinestro Corps aren't evil though, they're just fascist. Just as well, Batman REALLY isn't the guy I would be taking tips of righteousness from, considering he would rather let innocent people die than take a life if the choice was forced on him.
User avatar #104 - tkfourtwoone (09/20/2014) [-]
"Sinestro Corps aren't evil though, they're just fascist"

Mate, you just went full retard
User avatar #105 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
The Sinestro Corps were made in order to gain control and authority through fear; and Sinestro himself desires control and authority because he is a perfectionist who believes that only through absolute control can universal peace be achieved. Don't be butthurt because I know more about the series than you.
User avatar #107 - tkfourtwoone (09/20/2014) [-]
It doesn't matter if you know more about the DC universe than me (although after a quick glimpse it's quite easy to realize what the Yellow Corps stands for), but you're still a fucking retard.

Why? Because you apparently see nothing wrong with "control and authority through fear" or concepts like "only through absolute control can universal peace be achieved"

I'm sorry, but you're either a dumb-ass 14 year old or just plain moronic.
User avatar #108 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Ah, so now it's "You're stupid because you don't agree with me". That's nice.

In any case, how would you gain control if there was no other way? How would you stop people from fighting and get people to listen, the same people who, really, just didn't WANT to listen. I believe the ends justify the means in nearly all circumstances and that a true hero should be someone who is able to sacrifice their own 'heroism' in order to become a villain when needed
User avatar #109 - tkfourtwoone (09/20/2014) [-]
"I believe the ends justify the means in nearly all circumstances and that a true hero should be someone who is able to sacrifice their own 'heroism' in order to become a villain when needed "

No, I don't call you stupid for not agreeing with me. I'm calling you a full-blown idiot because that's what you are.

Btw, you might want to move out from wherever country you're from and go to Russia or North Korea. They seem to be actually implementing those "ideals" you so love.
But hey, it's so easy to talk about dictatorships & be a total nut, when you're living in a democratic country, right?
User avatar #111 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
You're just repeating yourself. "You're an idiot!" "Why?" "Because I say so!". It IS because I don't agree with you because if I used this same logic for Batman's side, you'd be brown-nosing me like no tomorrow.

1. I never said something was wrong with the place I lived in.
2. Russia is not interested in is people, but its territory; and North Korea is interested in the control it HOLDS over the people rather than the people itself; so neither of those countries work.
3. You're using ad hominem attacks
User avatar #113 - tkfourtwoone (09/20/2014) [-]
"It IS because I don't agree with you because if I used this same logic for Batman's side, you'd be brown-nosing me like no tomorrow"

No, it's not because I don't agree with you, it's because the complete brain farts you blurt out and call them "ideas" are moronic as fuck

Once again - "Sinestro Corps aren't evil though, they're just fascists". If you REALLY don't see absolutely anything wrong with that statement alone, the world would be better off with you jumping off a bridge.
User avatar #115 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Okay.
User avatar #96 - Riukanojutsu (09/20/2014) [-]
Iunno man.
You say not wanting to kill is really bad but it makes sense.
Killing is bad.
Batman's nemesis are a bunch of mentally unstable freaks. What do you think keeps batman from falling into madness? His principle without a doubt.
User avatar #98 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
That still doesn't make him any more of a fit hero. Killing may be bad, but there's also something called 'ends justify the means' and 'lesser of two evils'. Sometimes bad things must happen in order to prevent OTHER bad things from happening; in the Injustice comic, the only difference between Superman and Batman is that Superman is actually willing to sacrifice his FOES to see world peace, as well as his allies. Batman is not.
User avatar #106 - tkfourtwoone (09/20/2014) [-]
Look, you want to really blame something for not putting the super-villains out for good?
Blame the justice system! If they are too stupid to implement the death penalty for actions as terrible as Joker's & co, where's the heroes' fault then?

Oh, for not taking justice into their own hands?
So you'd be perfectly OK for a bunch of individuals, with powers far greater than that of any man, literally GODS compared to the homo sapiens, would start ignoring human laws because they deem it better? All the while swearing that their presence on a human planet is solely so that they could protect it?!

Superheroes ultimately can't protect humanity from itself, neither can they start governing it, because that would stand against their very hero principles themselves, taking away free will from humans.

Batman & co are wise enough to understand that, the Boy Scout in Blue & co have their heads way too jammed in their super-panties to ever realize that.
User avatar #110 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Part of being a hero is sacrifice. If a country or state does not have the death penalty, but it's obvious a certain member of the world would be better off dead, the hero should kill them and just take the heat.

Yes. I would trust that these beings, who see conflicts and evil around the world every day, would know better than anyone about what is best for the world. Just as well, they're obviously good natured simply for the fact that if they weren't, they wouldn't even PRETEND to be concerned about people, and only take what they feel they deserve; something power tends to allow you to do.

It's not taking away free-will any more than imposing a law is. Just because a being is super-powered does not make them any more or less of a political force than anything else; and as I already declared, part of being a hero is sacrifice, and that includes being a villain when necessary.

Batman is the last person I would take advice regarding righteousness from considering he'd sooner let innocent people die than take a life if the choice was forced on him.
User avatar #112 - tkfourtwoone (09/20/2014) [-]
Well then, you've just proven once again you're either incredibly immature or just incredibly stupid.

Either way, it would be folly to try and actually talk some sense into you.

Hoping for the former, don't worry, maybe once you'll get past the mental age of 14-16 you'll begin to see why you should be afraid of the "I have the power so I can do whatever the fuck I want mentality"
User avatar #114 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
"I totally have an awesome argument that could blow you out of the water...I'm uh..I'm not gonna tell you it though...BUT I REALLY DO HAVE ONE! You're totally wrong, but you just don't...uh, hm..DESERVE, ya, DESERVE to know why, because you're too stupid!"

Good one, man. I bet that works out so well in debate clubs.

In any case, I never said "Power means you can do whatever you want", I said "People with experience are better equipped to make tough decisions" and "If someone has power and cares about people, chances are they really are good people; because if they had power and didn't, they wouldn't even try to pretend". But you can believe whatever you like. Nice talking to you.
User avatar #22 - atomschlumpf (09/20/2014) [-]
Wonder woman was totally a fucking bitch, tho
User avatar #23 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
She certainly was, young man. If she wasn't such a bitch, perhaps many bad situations could have been avoided...
User avatar #24 - atomschlumpf (09/20/2014) [-]
I mostly agree with Superman, too. But I think without Wonder Woman the whole thing wouldn't have gone down the drain Just because she wants to fuck Supes, too
#15 - darthblam (09/19/2014) [-]
I have to agree on the killing of some super villains bit... There's simply nothing redeemable or fixable about them.
But not human folk, like the insane in Arkham Asylum Though the laws in Gotham seriously need some improvement... . He doesn't have the right. Superman should be taking out the constant global threats that are beyond the Earth's laws for good, like Doomsday, Darksied, or Mongul. You know, the alien threats. Seriously, what the fuck was bad about Superman wiping out the monstrous invaders from Apokolips?

But interfering with politics, hijacking governments, and telling entire nations what to do is simply wrong. ESPECIALLY establishing your own totalitarian world order.
User avatar #21 - hotspace (09/20/2014) [-]
If I remember, Superman attempted to murder Doomsday more than once, but he always came back and Darkseid is like almost impossible to kill, maybe Mongul also.
User avatar #17 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Yes, we can both agree on that I think. Although to me, Superman only did all that because nobody else could. It's not a matter of "do I have a right to do this" it's "Is it better if I do".

Earthlings can handle Earth just fine; but if they don't have the power to do so something, Superman, as a person with his own opinions and the POWER to change things, should be able to step in, give suggestions, help, and assistance where needed (though perhaps only on a defensive level).
#90 - mr skeltal (09/20/2014) [-]
superman didnt change shit, he just forced everyone to stop. If superman was gone, it would go back to the way it was, he did not create lasting change
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
Bullshit, he created an army and an empire.
User avatar #12 - hotspace (09/19/2014) [-]
I would have to disagree with you, I enjoy superheroes that don't kill more than superheroes that do kill. Not to say I don't like those that do kill, I just enjoy the comics of the characters that don't more. It adds depth to the stories and, in reality, the heroes wouldn't have the right to kill these people because they have no authority to legally. While I agree that some of Superman's actions were justified, I think Batman was just as justified in being horrified over the killings done by the new Justice League.
User avatar #74 - zelivingzombie (09/20/2014) [-]
I feel like Superman has stopped realizing what matters and he has blurred his own line between right and wrong. Batman had a good point when he said that if you use force to stop the fighting then that solves nothing and I feel like the people around Superman (other than the Sinestro Corps) need to make him see reason
User avatar #57 - hydraetis (09/20/2014) [-]
So they don't have the right to kill but criminals do?

I definitely think Superman went way over the top but for the love of fuck, just because they don't have a badge they're not allowed kill someone who regularly and casually wipes out entire city blocks full of people?
#27 - mr skeltal (09/20/2014) [-]
Batman Under The Red Hood - Ending Scene [Good Quality] This scene from Under The Red Hood kind of shows both sides of the argument. Although I think it's black and white enough that as a human being they have the right to kill people like the Joker that constantly murder people without a second thought. People that have ended hundreds of innocent lives and have no intention to stop, people that are known beyond a shadow of a doubt to have done these things, anyone in the world has the right to put people like that in the ground if you ask me.
User avatar #13 - captainfuckitall (09/19/2014) [-]
But what's a hero worth if they change nothing? It's no different than Captain America starting out as a poster boy for the Military because nobody thought he could make a difference. That's not to say heroes that don't kill don't make a difference; I'm sure they help people and make the world a nicer and safer (though not necessarily better) place, it's just that...characters like the Joker for example, need to die. It's not even an issue of whether he deserves it or not, it's just that keeping him alive costs FAR more lives than would be helped if HE were saved. That's all.

Depth, story-telling, and plot are all well and good, but I really just can't look up to a hero who has a morality crisis while everyone around them is dying. That's why I like characters like Rorschach. He was INCREDIBLY deep and complex, but his motivations were pure and simple: "There is good and there is evil, and evil must be punished".

Indeed a lot of the things the New Justice League did are horrible, including the killing of their own teammates but we have to remember we're not looking at it from the perspective of a citizen, who many would argue that the world is, in fact, a better place to live; but we're looking at it from the view of heroes with morality crisis'.

Also, that's one of the things that really made me dislike the comic over-all, it was just so bias and cherry-picking because the authors WANTED you to agree with Batman and see he was right, and so they made the New Justice League seem far more brutal than it was, simply by the narration of other heroes, than it had to be.
User avatar #14 - hotspace (09/19/2014) [-]
I see where you're coming from. However, almost all villains are captured and sent to a prison of some sort, at some point during their reign. In a sense, Superheroes are bounty hunters and the courts decide not to kill them. Superheroes tend to hold themselves to a higher standard and to them, a higher standard would be an abhorrence towards killing.

Any superhero can kill and all of them think about it, but they don't, even if they are like wonder woman and trained in war. They do all they can not to kill because it isn't their place. I tend to dislike characters who do kill more because then everything they do because morally ambiguous. It's probably not realistic to paint them like that, but they become too dark in comics.

Also, I do agree that they could have made the new Justice league less brutal and made the story a lot more interesting, if they allowed the reader themselves to decide who they believed was right instead of shoving batman's side down their throats.
User avatar #16 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
That's just it, though. To me, that kind of mindset is absolutely absurd. I could NEVER let innocent people die and evil people live because "I represent goodness and righteousness. It is not my place. I must be a shining example" simply because I wouldn't have the heart to stand in front of a crowd and give that reason as to why I let a serial-killing mass-murderer escape for the 50th time only to blow up New York. It's just absolute insanity, and I always got the feeling that heroes didn't kill people only because they didn't have the heart to do it and any type of 'moral righteousness' was just bullshit they spewed to justify their inefficiency (which is also why I hate Batman the most).
User avatar #20 - hotspace (09/20/2014) [-]
I see what you're saying, but to me, the idea that after all the trauma that these villains caused not only the world, but the heroes themselves and that the heroes still never kills them, is an amazing concept to me. Also, it's almost never the heroes fault that they escape, it's the corruption within the prisons that allows people to bust them out, like when Bane took over Arkham. As horrible as the situation becomes, the hero never goes against their beliefs. "A man has to have a code" I don't know man, to me I probably wouldn't be able to not kill going through what the villains do either, but that's why I like the heroes that don't, it's amazing their ability to stay true to what they believe.
#22 - I have wonderful facial hair, except for one problem. …  [+] (1 new reply) 09/19/2014 on MFW I can't grow a beard +4
User avatar #23 - apuzzledbear (09/19/2014) [-]
I fucking know this feel, brother.
#40 - Funnyjunk: First, last, and only defense against the worst scu… 09/19/2014 on FJ is becoming relevant +1
#200 - As a glorious ************ on 8chan put it: This …  [+] (3 new replies) 09/19/2014 on Gamergate/SJW discussion... +11
User avatar #599 - Sunset (09/20/2014) [-]
trust me when i say this; NONE of the mods are SJW's. if any of them were they'd get shit on by so many of the other mods
User avatar #608 - captainfuckitall (09/20/2014) [-]
People got banned for saying nigger and starting Fat-Shaming threads, man...
User avatar #614 - Sunset (09/20/2014) [-]
none of the mods here*, sorry kek
#16 - 1. r u srs m8? That's one of the biggest reasons why such comm…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/19/2014 on Console peasant's FW -2
#60 - mr skeltal (09/19/2014) [-]
You cant possibly understand how stupid you sound simply because you are not used to PC gaming.

But believe me when i tell you, you sound incredibly stupid.

Modding is usually referred to a different thing than what you have in mind. Look up Nexus (the site for mods) or check GTA SA/IV mod sites. That might give you an idea why it is a good thing.

Graphics are meaningless when the rest is shit i agree. But you fail to forget that most games are not only has amazing graphics, but good gameplay too. for example, a (good) port to PC usually haves the same everything, but with much better graphics and higher resolution and framerates. Try playing Skyrim on a console and on a PC with graphical mods. No one would say that the console version is better, even tho it's the same game with different graphics.

What one buys is the one's business. If i choose to buy something and never play it still counts. Altho PC do make more money than consoles and Steam is the biggest digital gaming seller
#10 - >Inb4 people huddle around their computers, convincing them…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/19/2014 on Console peasant's FW -3
#12 - mr skeltal (09/19/2014) [-]
>implying PC games support any modding in multiplayer that could give someone a gameplay advantage
>implying you're gonna get the same visual quality from a console as PC
>implying buying a game that we might end up playing some day for less than the price of a can of soda is a waste of money (and implying that you could get those deals from any console company)

Shit, man, I have an Xbox and am probs gonna by a Playstation 4 at some point, but you raise terrible points
User avatar #16 - captainfuckitall (09/19/2014) [-]
1. r u srs m8? That's one of the biggest reasons why such communities as Dark Souls are getting more and more into single-player; because people keep coming in with mods. Rather, can you name any game that doesn't have competitive multiplayer that cannot be broken with mods?

2. That's fine. I don't play games for graphics, nor do I want a 2000$ system just so I can run them on 'super-high' with modding.

3. I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you over the thousands of people crying out about wasting hundreds of dollars on these summer sales. Just as well, you CAN get those types of deals from console companies and have before. As a matter of fact, nearly every membership deal (which costs far less than a gaming computer) for Xbox or PlayStation comes with free games every other week.

How the hell can you tell me I raise terrible points when your arguments were
"No it doesn't" (it has)
"The graphics are better" (nobody cares)
And "No they don't" (they have).
#60 - mr skeltal (09/19/2014) [-]
You cant possibly understand how stupid you sound simply because you are not used to PC gaming.

But believe me when i tell you, you sound incredibly stupid.

Modding is usually referred to a different thing than what you have in mind. Look up Nexus (the site for mods) or check GTA SA/IV mod sites. That might give you an idea why it is a good thing.

Graphics are meaningless when the rest is shit i agree. But you fail to forget that most games are not only has amazing graphics, but good gameplay too. for example, a (good) port to PC usually haves the same everything, but with much better graphics and higher resolution and framerates. Try playing Skyrim on a console and on a PC with graphical mods. No one would say that the console version is better, even tho it's the same game with different graphics.

What one buys is the one's business. If i choose to buy something and never play it still counts. Altho PC do make more money than consoles and Steam is the biggest digital gaming seller
#27 - Your waifu a **** 09/19/2014 on So we're bringing this... -3
#19 - Picture 09/19/2014 on Human attack! 0
#159 - You're a saint. 09/18/2014 on EXTREMELY HEAVY BREATHING +1
#112 - When the hell does she make that face? I just remember it bein…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/18/2014 on EXTREMELY HEAVY BREATHING +3
User avatar #159 - captainfuckitall (09/18/2014) [-]
You're a saint.
#9 - Uh...nearly afraid to ask, but what the hell is that monster o…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/18/2014 on A vulcan in the streets 0
User avatar #12 - nocakeforthetroll (09/18/2014) [-]
The crawler.
#21 - I still hate the **** .  [+] (1 new reply) 09/17/2014 on jimbles nutrin 0
User avatar #58 - midnightrain (09/18/2014) [-]
It's all good man, you can hate patrick, but fuck Carl!
#11 - I feel the same way when I see Patrick Star. I feel your pain.  [+] (3 new replies) 09/17/2014 on jimbles nutrin 0
User avatar #16 - midnightrain (09/17/2014) [-]
Fuck no Patrick is smarter than Carl
User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (09/17/2014) [-]
I still hate the fuck.
User avatar #58 - midnightrain (09/18/2014) [-]
It's all good man, you can hate patrick, but fuck Carl!
#59 - Thank you, friend! 09/17/2014 on Keepin' it alive 0
#57 - Source for that comic?  [+] (3 new replies) 09/17/2014 on Keepin' it alive 0
User avatar #58 - samoaspider (09/17/2014) [-]
User avatar #82 - zonryu (09/17/2014) [-]
saved
User avatar #59 - captainfuckitall (09/17/2014) [-]
Thank you, friend!
#127 - Well, no. What you LITERALLY said was that BECAUSE the bible w…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/17/2014 on (untitled) -1
#130 - mr skeltal (09/17/2014) [-]
Can you even read? I said "it's completely safe", not "it's a logical consequence", so you can get that "LITERALLY" back and put it up your ass. Next sentence: what the fuck is even your point? Vaccines are a SCIENTIFIC product, they can be TESTED and you can OBJECTIVELY extrapolate data and DETERMINE if they work or not on a given organism. Also stop messing up the fucking discussion dividing it into two branches of comments.
#126 - Haha, oh boy, here we go... 1. I'm not trying to 'dra…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/17/2014 on (untitled) -1
#131 - mr skeltal (09/17/2014) [-]
Get a fucking dictionary ( www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/faith ) and read what the definition of "faith" is. Of course you don't know, making assumptions and taking risks doesn't mean having faith, you illiterate dipshit. That's what you morons do all the time, you twist the meaning of words. That's NOT CALLED HAVING FAITH, no matter how much YOU hate it. Again you make cretin assumptions and then try to use them as arguments? No, I don't calculate every second of my day and "religious progress" doesn't mean shit because religion does only get more followers, it doesn't "progress" shit. THEOLOGY, on the other hand, can progress, and we've already said that it doesn't have any impact on the majority of the followers. But hey, if you think that building 4 walls and a ceiling counts for "religious progress", go ahead. Religious literature is either more fiction or philosophy and inventing new prayers doesn't give you any deeper insight of the divine. Laugh more, shitlord.

Comments(483):

[ 483 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (17 hours ago) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (10 hours ago) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
#480 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#479 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#478 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#477 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#476 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - mr skeltal (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - mr skeltal (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
[ 483 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)