x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9128
Comment Ranking:#1639
Highest Content Rank:#9131
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 58439 total,  71833 ,  13394
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 92% (920/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10883
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16786
FJ Points:25152

latest user's comments

#52 - If you saw the amount of red thumbs I get when I usually criti…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2015 on Adult Debate 0
User avatar #54 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
That's just how unpopular opinions work. Doesn't mean that everyone else is a fanatic. It just means that you are the minority on the issue.

I personally don't find batman very interesting. But I love his stories because of the other characters involved. Batman is very dry, dreary, intelligent, and stoic. It's entertaining when more colorful characters take him for a spin. And it's intriguing to be reminded that behind the mask he is a human, too, despite his best efforts to be a pillar of righteousness. Supes has some of the same characteristics, but his moral compass and sense of justice are more out of ideal naivety and faith than out of obligation and personal sacrifice.
#49 - No it isn't. "Could Batman beat the Justice Leag…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/22/2015 on Adult Debate 0
User avatar #90 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
I´d be so hyped if Batman finally got completely outplanned by someone, just to make the fanboys shut up.

That´s why I want Batman to go up against Constantine so much.
#50 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
chill out dude. Jesus.

I didn't say that someone always winning is uninteresting. I said that how someone wins is more interesting. Superman winning against batman is uninteresting because of how it would go. Actually, I don't know if Batman will win in this next movie. I honestly don't care as long as they make it engaging and thought-provoking. I'm saying that's a lot harder to do when you have an overpowered fucking alien smashing the shit out of a regular dude with money. If they can make Superman winning really interesting and cool within a 2-3 hour period, fans will be satisfied. It's just way harder to do that as a writer.

Like you said, Superman was designed to be a Mary Sue with all his powers. Batman is a Mary Sue with his foresight and "intellect". Honestly, the latter is more interesting in a fight, and especially a movie.

You're talking about a small minority of batman fans who would be upset about Batman losing or not thinking of things 999999 steps ahead. Most fans recognize that it's ridiculous, and would probably even be mad if the movie abused that too much. Look at the Dark Knight trilogy- arguably one of the most successful batman movies ever. The Batman in there doesn't have crazy plans that somehow prepare him for EVERYTHING. It happens sometimes, but not to the point where he is never caught off guard. He is surprised a lot in those movies, and yet the fans love it (at least in the Dark Knight).

You're blowing Batman fan's fanaticism way out of proportion.
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
If you saw the amount of red thumbs I get when I usually criticize Batman, you would indeed be flabbergasted. Here's a social experiment for you: Walk into your local comic book store while it's fairly busy, and admit in a casual voice that you don't like Batman. See what happens. You'll see...
User avatar #54 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
That's just how unpopular opinions work. Doesn't mean that everyone else is a fanatic. It just means that you are the minority on the issue.

I personally don't find batman very interesting. But I love his stories because of the other characters involved. Batman is very dry, dreary, intelligent, and stoic. It's entertaining when more colorful characters take him for a spin. And it's intriguing to be reminded that behind the mask he is a human, too, despite his best efforts to be a pillar of righteousness. Supes has some of the same characteristics, but his moral compass and sense of justice are more out of ideal naivety and faith than out of obligation and personal sacrifice.
#7 - 'Adult' is just a state of mind, old chap. Wanna be young fore…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2015 on Adulthood +1
#8 - vominmymoutabit (04/22/2015) [-]
You are wise. Thanks for the advice.
#46 - Then why even pit them together? Everyone knows Batman will wi…  [+] (7 new replies) 04/22/2015 on Adult Debate +2
User avatar #47 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
It's true though. He can. That's his "super-human power". I personally don't find that particular aspect about him interesting, but he's pitted against superman because that scenario is interesting. You may not think it, but many people do.

1. Best friends with ironclad senses of justice and moral diligence fighting
2. The underdog story of the weak overcoming the strong
3. The strong respecting the weak for instilling humility
4. The idealist with endless gifts vs. the realist who worked hard for his successes

Plus, I don't find superman interesting in the least because he's given all the superpowers and endowments based on what he needs. It's the same shit as batman. Batman gets the opportunities and luck to overcome his trials, and superman is just gets powers whenever convenient. If you ask me, in that regard, at least Batman's cliches are more creative; they require thought in order to get him out of sticky situations.
User avatar #89 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
It´s not, though.

There´s only so much he can do against beings that are literally gods.

Or against those who are more intelligent then he is.

Or those who can prepare for a fight better.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
No it isn't.

"Could Batman beat the Justice League?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"
"Could Batman beat the entire U.S. military?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"
"Could Batman beat Thor, Cthulhu, The Four Kings, and Dr.Manhatten all at the same time?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"

How the fuck is that interesting in the slightest? You already said someone always winning is NOT interesting, and yet you're defending the guy who wins the MOST fights out of any hero. Many people are also anti-vaccine, it doesn't make the idea any less stupid.

Batman doesn't have best friends. He treats his arch enemies better than his allies and even getting a 'thank you' is like squeezing water from a stone. Batman is also never the underdog; in any circumstance he's in, whether fight, or battle of wits, or even conversation, he ALWAYS comes out on top, always proves himself smarter, and is always given the best lines. Superman is also one of the most humble heroes there is. Too hard for his successes; at least Superman has some type of REASON behind his great power; he's an alien, kick ass, Batman just went off for 10 years and suddenly became a world authority on absolutely everything there is to know or do. Many people go to college for 4 years just for ONE subject, ever ask them if they consider themselves a master in it? Besides, you talk as if Superman never developed, despite the fact that he learned many of his own martial arts styles, psychic fighting styles, has his own academic background and genius intellect, so on, so fourth...

The issue is that Superman is MEANT to be that way, though. He was made in a time when everyone lost hope and he became that ideal of a new one; of course he was made as a Mary Sue. Batman just became one because people liked the idea of him not losing, ever.
User avatar #90 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
I´d be so hyped if Batman finally got completely outplanned by someone, just to make the fanboys shut up.

That´s why I want Batman to go up against Constantine so much.
#50 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
chill out dude. Jesus.

I didn't say that someone always winning is uninteresting. I said that how someone wins is more interesting. Superman winning against batman is uninteresting because of how it would go. Actually, I don't know if Batman will win in this next movie. I honestly don't care as long as they make it engaging and thought-provoking. I'm saying that's a lot harder to do when you have an overpowered fucking alien smashing the shit out of a regular dude with money. If they can make Superman winning really interesting and cool within a 2-3 hour period, fans will be satisfied. It's just way harder to do that as a writer.

Like you said, Superman was designed to be a Mary Sue with all his powers. Batman is a Mary Sue with his foresight and "intellect". Honestly, the latter is more interesting in a fight, and especially a movie.

You're talking about a small minority of batman fans who would be upset about Batman losing or not thinking of things 999999 steps ahead. Most fans recognize that it's ridiculous, and would probably even be mad if the movie abused that too much. Look at the Dark Knight trilogy- arguably one of the most successful batman movies ever. The Batman in there doesn't have crazy plans that somehow prepare him for EVERYTHING. It happens sometimes, but not to the point where he is never caught off guard. He is surprised a lot in those movies, and yet the fans love it (at least in the Dark Knight).

You're blowing Batman fan's fanaticism way out of proportion.
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
If you saw the amount of red thumbs I get when I usually criticize Batman, you would indeed be flabbergasted. Here's a social experiment for you: Walk into your local comic book store while it's fairly busy, and admit in a casual voice that you don't like Batman. See what happens. You'll see...
User avatar #54 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
That's just how unpopular opinions work. Doesn't mean that everyone else is a fanatic. It just means that you are the minority on the issue.

I personally don't find batman very interesting. But I love his stories because of the other characters involved. Batman is very dry, dreary, intelligent, and stoic. It's entertaining when more colorful characters take him for a spin. And it's intriguing to be reminded that behind the mask he is a human, too, despite his best efforts to be a pillar of righteousness. Supes has some of the same characteristics, but his moral compass and sense of justice are more out of ideal naivety and faith than out of obligation and personal sacrifice.
#172 - How do you figure? 04/22/2015 on Vaccine +1
#171 - B-but I'm not anti-vac! 04/22/2015 on Vaccine +2
#170 - Except I'm not. I was just clearing up a misconception. 04/22/2015 on Vaccine +1
#169 - Of course, that's why I get them. I just figure I get sick bec…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2015 on Vaccine +2
#223 - rakoom (04/22/2015) [-]
Luckily that's not how it rowks.
#168 - You're right, of course. I just wanted to put my own experienc… 04/22/2015 on Vaccine +3
#166 - What do you mean 'anecdotal evidence'? I'm not against vaccine… 04/22/2015 on Vaccine +1
#43 - I know, but he never is. Could you even imagine how much of a …  [+] (2 new replies) 04/22/2015 on Adult Debate +2
User avatar #64 - Greevon (04/22/2015) [-]
Without justice, Batman is just a lunatic dressed as a flying rodent fighting other crazy hobos on the street.

Superman, when evil, is still Superman. His character isn't being the ultimate good, it's being the ultimate power. He is nothing without his powers, just as Batman is nothing without his strict moral code. One could argue that the few times he has actually killed someone (always later scrubbed from canon or made clear to be an alt universe) he did away with his real identity. Batman has a clear line set he cannot cross and beyond that he is a broken spiteful man that belongs in Arkham.

That said, I would love to watch a movie about that broken spiteful man punching psyche patients in alleys.
#45 - shaddyz (04/22/2015) [-]
i see why he kinda has to be otherwise he would never be able to stay relevant... but ill be honest, i want a reverse injustice...
#42 - And a fight where Batman pulls out every gadget he needs and e…  [+] (9 new replies) 04/22/2015 on Adult Debate +1
User avatar #44 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
More so than superman one-punching the shit out of batman.

No one denies that superman can win against Batman, and is likely to. It's interesting to see how Batman defeats superman, though. That's up to the writers really. If they can make it interesting or clever or entertaining, good on them. They have more to work with when it's a regular man beating a superpowered alien god, though.

It's like a slam dunk contest. It's the same shit over and over again; it's a guy jumping and slamming a ball into a basket. People watch it because it's interesting to see how they do it.
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
Then why even pit them together? Everyone knows Batman will win in the end because he's the underdog, how's that interesting?

You'd be absolutely floored by just how many batman fans twist their nipples in fury at such a suggestion that Superman could ever in a million years beat Batman. Remember the golden rule my friend: "Batman can beat _______ (put literally any fictional or real character from history in that slot) with enough prep-time!"
User avatar #47 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
It's true though. He can. That's his "super-human power". I personally don't find that particular aspect about him interesting, but he's pitted against superman because that scenario is interesting. You may not think it, but many people do.

1. Best friends with ironclad senses of justice and moral diligence fighting
2. The underdog story of the weak overcoming the strong
3. The strong respecting the weak for instilling humility
4. The idealist with endless gifts vs. the realist who worked hard for his successes

Plus, I don't find superman interesting in the least because he's given all the superpowers and endowments based on what he needs. It's the same shit as batman. Batman gets the opportunities and luck to overcome his trials, and superman is just gets powers whenever convenient. If you ask me, in that regard, at least Batman's cliches are more creative; they require thought in order to get him out of sticky situations.
User avatar #89 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
It´s not, though.

There´s only so much he can do against beings that are literally gods.

Or against those who are more intelligent then he is.

Or those who can prepare for a fight better.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
No it isn't.

"Could Batman beat the Justice League?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"
"Could Batman beat the entire U.S. military?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"
"Could Batman beat Thor, Cthulhu, The Four Kings, and Dr.Manhatten all at the same time?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"

How the fuck is that interesting in the slightest? You already said someone always winning is NOT interesting, and yet you're defending the guy who wins the MOST fights out of any hero. Many people are also anti-vaccine, it doesn't make the idea any less stupid.

Batman doesn't have best friends. He treats his arch enemies better than his allies and even getting a 'thank you' is like squeezing water from a stone. Batman is also never the underdog; in any circumstance he's in, whether fight, or battle of wits, or even conversation, he ALWAYS comes out on top, always proves himself smarter, and is always given the best lines. Superman is also one of the most humble heroes there is. Too hard for his successes; at least Superman has some type of REASON behind his great power; he's an alien, kick ass, Batman just went off for 10 years and suddenly became a world authority on absolutely everything there is to know or do. Many people go to college for 4 years just for ONE subject, ever ask them if they consider themselves a master in it? Besides, you talk as if Superman never developed, despite the fact that he learned many of his own martial arts styles, psychic fighting styles, has his own academic background and genius intellect, so on, so fourth...

The issue is that Superman is MEANT to be that way, though. He was made in a time when everyone lost hope and he became that ideal of a new one; of course he was made as a Mary Sue. Batman just became one because people liked the idea of him not losing, ever.
User avatar #90 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
I´d be so hyped if Batman finally got completely outplanned by someone, just to make the fanboys shut up.

That´s why I want Batman to go up against Constantine so much.
#50 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
chill out dude. Jesus.

I didn't say that someone always winning is uninteresting. I said that how someone wins is more interesting. Superman winning against batman is uninteresting because of how it would go. Actually, I don't know if Batman will win in this next movie. I honestly don't care as long as they make it engaging and thought-provoking. I'm saying that's a lot harder to do when you have an overpowered fucking alien smashing the shit out of a regular dude with money. If they can make Superman winning really interesting and cool within a 2-3 hour period, fans will be satisfied. It's just way harder to do that as a writer.

Like you said, Superman was designed to be a Mary Sue with all his powers. Batman is a Mary Sue with his foresight and "intellect". Honestly, the latter is more interesting in a fight, and especially a movie.

You're talking about a small minority of batman fans who would be upset about Batman losing or not thinking of things 999999 steps ahead. Most fans recognize that it's ridiculous, and would probably even be mad if the movie abused that too much. Look at the Dark Knight trilogy- arguably one of the most successful batman movies ever. The Batman in there doesn't have crazy plans that somehow prepare him for EVERYTHING. It happens sometimes, but not to the point where he is never caught off guard. He is surprised a lot in those movies, and yet the fans love it (at least in the Dark Knight).

You're blowing Batman fan's fanaticism way out of proportion.
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
If you saw the amount of red thumbs I get when I usually criticize Batman, you would indeed be flabbergasted. Here's a social experiment for you: Walk into your local comic book store while it's fairly busy, and admit in a casual voice that you don't like Batman. See what happens. You'll see...
User avatar #54 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
That's just how unpopular opinions work. Doesn't mean that everyone else is a fanatic. It just means that you are the minority on the issue.

I personally don't find batman very interesting. But I love his stories because of the other characters involved. Batman is very dry, dreary, intelligent, and stoic. It's entertaining when more colorful characters take him for a spin. And it's intriguing to be reminded that behind the mask he is a human, too, despite his best efforts to be a pillar of righteousness. Supes has some of the same characteristics, but his moral compass and sense of justice are more out of ideal naivety and faith than out of obligation and personal sacrifice.
#41 - I did, it got better almost immediately and he proceeded to kick ass.  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2015 on Adult Debate +3
#71 - themightymrplow (04/22/2015) [-]
Not agreeing, not disagreeing, just spreading information. In the movies it got healed fairly quickly, but in the comics he took a bit longer. While he was out of commission, a character named Azrael one member from a group of assassins who then made his own Batsuit and took up the mantle. After certain events Which I THINK involved him being caught in the middle of a double psychic war where one expelled a shitload of energy his back got healed. He then had to take the Batman identity back from Azrael by force. Pic related, it's Azrael Batman.

Comicexplain go ahead and tell them everything I got wrong because I know I got some wrong.
#17 - How can you say that with a straight face when Batman never lo…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/21/2015 on Adult Debate +4
User avatar #22 - nyangiraffe (04/21/2015) [-]
Batman loses a lot. Ask his spine.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
I did, it got better almost immediately and he proceeded to kick ass.
#71 - themightymrplow (04/22/2015) [-]
Not agreeing, not disagreeing, just spreading information. In the movies it got healed fairly quickly, but in the comics he took a bit longer. While he was out of commission, a character named Azrael one member from a group of assassins who then made his own Batsuit and took up the mantle. After certain events Which I THINK involved him being caught in the middle of a double psychic war where one expelled a shitload of energy his back got healed. He then had to take the Batman identity back from Azrael by force. Pic related, it's Azrael Batman.

Comicexplain go ahead and tell them everything I got wrong because I know I got some wrong.
User avatar #26 - hydraetis (04/21/2015) [-]
But somehow that doesn't count.
#15 - Honestly? I don't give two ***** about the Batman Vs. S…  [+] (23 new replies) 04/21/2015 on Adult Debate +24
#79 - Ken M (04/22/2015) [-]
Neither of them are going to "lose", it is a set up for The Justice League so they will come to some kind of stalemate after one upping each other over and over again until it gets boring, then team up.
I am interested to see HOW they will do it, but that is how it will go.
User avatar #59 - AnomynousUser (04/22/2015) [-]
Just gonna copy-paste my theory I previously posted... Well, more of a hope than a theory.

What if Batman can't beat Superman?
What if Superman fighting Batman doesn't get him in line, but rather makes him go further down his path?
What if the beginning of the Justice League in this universe isn't like the others?
What if the first enemy the Justice League teams up to fight against is actually Superman, and Justice League movie is just the direct sequel to this movie?
What if Superman isn't a founding member, but rather the reason for the team, and doesn't change his ways until the team takes him down?!
#40 - shaddyz (04/22/2015) [-]
it could be made really fun IF batman would be in the wrong for once.. like reverse injustice...
User avatar #43 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
I know, but he never is. Could you even imagine how much of a supervillain Batman would be if he turned evil? What a threat he would pose? How interesting THOSE fights would be?

But no.

Batman must always be right and just.
User avatar #64 - Greevon (04/22/2015) [-]
Without justice, Batman is just a lunatic dressed as a flying rodent fighting other crazy hobos on the street.

Superman, when evil, is still Superman. His character isn't being the ultimate good, it's being the ultimate power. He is nothing without his powers, just as Batman is nothing without his strict moral code. One could argue that the few times he has actually killed someone (always later scrubbed from canon or made clear to be an alt universe) he did away with his real identity. Batman has a clear line set he cannot cross and beyond that he is a broken spiteful man that belongs in Arkham.

That said, I would love to watch a movie about that broken spiteful man punching psyche patients in alleys.
#45 - shaddyz (04/22/2015) [-]
i see why he kinda has to be otherwise he would never be able to stay relevant... but ill be honest, i want a reverse injustice...
User avatar #39 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
No it's because watching Superman win would be extremely short and uninteresting.
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
And a fight where Batman pulls out every gadget he needs and exploits every weakness IS interesting?
User avatar #44 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
More so than superman one-punching the shit out of batman.

No one denies that superman can win against Batman, and is likely to. It's interesting to see how Batman defeats superman, though. That's up to the writers really. If they can make it interesting or clever or entertaining, good on them. They have more to work with when it's a regular man beating a superpowered alien god, though.

It's like a slam dunk contest. It's the same shit over and over again; it's a guy jumping and slamming a ball into a basket. People watch it because it's interesting to see how they do it.
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
Then why even pit them together? Everyone knows Batman will win in the end because he's the underdog, how's that interesting?

You'd be absolutely floored by just how many batman fans twist their nipples in fury at such a suggestion that Superman could ever in a million years beat Batman. Remember the golden rule my friend: "Batman can beat _______ (put literally any fictional or real character from history in that slot) with enough prep-time!"
User avatar #47 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
It's true though. He can. That's his "super-human power". I personally don't find that particular aspect about him interesting, but he's pitted against superman because that scenario is interesting. You may not think it, but many people do.

1. Best friends with ironclad senses of justice and moral diligence fighting
2. The underdog story of the weak overcoming the strong
3. The strong respecting the weak for instilling humility
4. The idealist with endless gifts vs. the realist who worked hard for his successes

Plus, I don't find superman interesting in the least because he's given all the superpowers and endowments based on what he needs. It's the same shit as batman. Batman gets the opportunities and luck to overcome his trials, and superman is just gets powers whenever convenient. If you ask me, in that regard, at least Batman's cliches are more creative; they require thought in order to get him out of sticky situations.
User avatar #89 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
It´s not, though.

There´s only so much he can do against beings that are literally gods.

Or against those who are more intelligent then he is.

Or those who can prepare for a fight better.
User avatar #49 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
No it isn't.

"Could Batman beat the Justice League?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"
"Could Batman beat the entire U.S. military?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"
"Could Batman beat Thor, Cthulhu, The Four Kings, and Dr.Manhatten all at the same time?"
"Yeah, with enough prep-time"

How the fuck is that interesting in the slightest? You already said someone always winning is NOT interesting, and yet you're defending the guy who wins the MOST fights out of any hero. Many people are also anti-vaccine, it doesn't make the idea any less stupid.

Batman doesn't have best friends. He treats his arch enemies better than his allies and even getting a 'thank you' is like squeezing water from a stone. Batman is also never the underdog; in any circumstance he's in, whether fight, or battle of wits, or even conversation, he ALWAYS comes out on top, always proves himself smarter, and is always given the best lines. Superman is also one of the most humble heroes there is. Too hard for his successes; at least Superman has some type of REASON behind his great power; he's an alien, kick ass, Batman just went off for 10 years and suddenly became a world authority on absolutely everything there is to know or do. Many people go to college for 4 years just for ONE subject, ever ask them if they consider themselves a master in it? Besides, you talk as if Superman never developed, despite the fact that he learned many of his own martial arts styles, psychic fighting styles, has his own academic background and genius intellect, so on, so fourth...

The issue is that Superman is MEANT to be that way, though. He was made in a time when everyone lost hope and he became that ideal of a new one; of course he was made as a Mary Sue. Batman just became one because people liked the idea of him not losing, ever.
User avatar #90 - ljxjlos (04/22/2015) [-]
I´d be so hyped if Batman finally got completely outplanned by someone, just to make the fanboys shut up.

That´s why I want Batman to go up against Constantine so much.
#50 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
chill out dude. Jesus.

I didn't say that someone always winning is uninteresting. I said that how someone wins is more interesting. Superman winning against batman is uninteresting because of how it would go. Actually, I don't know if Batman will win in this next movie. I honestly don't care as long as they make it engaging and thought-provoking. I'm saying that's a lot harder to do when you have an overpowered fucking alien smashing the shit out of a regular dude with money. If they can make Superman winning really interesting and cool within a 2-3 hour period, fans will be satisfied. It's just way harder to do that as a writer.

Like you said, Superman was designed to be a Mary Sue with all his powers. Batman is a Mary Sue with his foresight and "intellect". Honestly, the latter is more interesting in a fight, and especially a movie.

You're talking about a small minority of batman fans who would be upset about Batman losing or not thinking of things 999999 steps ahead. Most fans recognize that it's ridiculous, and would probably even be mad if the movie abused that too much. Look at the Dark Knight trilogy- arguably one of the most successful batman movies ever. The Batman in there doesn't have crazy plans that somehow prepare him for EVERYTHING. It happens sometimes, but not to the point where he is never caught off guard. He is surprised a lot in those movies, and yet the fans love it (at least in the Dark Knight).

You're blowing Batman fan's fanaticism way out of proportion.
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
If you saw the amount of red thumbs I get when I usually criticize Batman, you would indeed be flabbergasted. Here's a social experiment for you: Walk into your local comic book store while it's fairly busy, and admit in a casual voice that you don't like Batman. See what happens. You'll see...
User avatar #54 - guitarguise (04/22/2015) [-]
That's just how unpopular opinions work. Doesn't mean that everyone else is a fanatic. It just means that you are the minority on the issue.

I personally don't find batman very interesting. But I love his stories because of the other characters involved. Batman is very dry, dreary, intelligent, and stoic. It's entertaining when more colorful characters take him for a spin. And it's intriguing to be reminded that behind the mask he is a human, too, despite his best efforts to be a pillar of righteousness. Supes has some of the same characteristics, but his moral compass and sense of justice are more out of ideal naivety and faith than out of obligation and personal sacrifice.
#16 - noplaceperson (04/21/2015) [-]
Superman would win pretty much every fight and because of that he is a boring super hero. It's way more exciting to watch a normal dude struggle to fight these superhuman beings then to watch this godlike figure easily beat everyone.
User avatar #17 - captainfuckitall (04/21/2015) [-]
How can you say that with a straight face when Batman never loses and is always right?

Seriously, his fans are worse than Zealot Fanatics when it comes to Batman and how great he is.
User avatar #22 - nyangiraffe (04/21/2015) [-]
Batman loses a lot. Ask his spine.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
I did, it got better almost immediately and he proceeded to kick ass.
#71 - themightymrplow (04/22/2015) [-]
Not agreeing, not disagreeing, just spreading information. In the movies it got healed fairly quickly, but in the comics he took a bit longer. While he was out of commission, a character named Azrael one member from a group of assassins who then made his own Batsuit and took up the mantle. After certain events Which I THINK involved him being caught in the middle of a double psychic war where one expelled a shitload of energy his back got healed. He then had to take the Batman identity back from Azrael by force. Pic related, it's Azrael Batman.

Comicexplain go ahead and tell them everything I got wrong because I know I got some wrong.
User avatar #26 - hydraetis (04/21/2015) [-]
But somehow that doesn't count.
#13 - But I wasn't sick for years prior, even during flu season, eve…  [+] (16 new replies) 04/21/2015 on Vaccine -3
#152 - Visual (04/22/2015) [-]
You're completely missing his point.
User avatar #170 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
Except I'm not. I was just clearing up a misconception.
User avatar #104 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
you typically get vaccinations as a baby; most afterwards are either boosters or for a new strain of flu for that year, and of course some people have both better immune systems and better reactions to vaccines. what i'm saying is that when the weakened strain is injected into your body, it's combined with chemicals to stimulate the immune system to the "threat" which causes some people to get flu-like symtoms for a short while afterwards due to the sudden energy needed to produce antibodies.

any symptoms from diseases like over-active sinuses (runny nose), vomiting, diarrhea, fever, sneezing, couching, etc. are actually bodily reactions to get rid of diseases; not the disease itself. If you didn't have an immune system and were infected with a disease, you'd become extremely fatigued and either get poisoning from bacterial waste or die from organ failure due to cells being destroyed by viruses.

tl;dr: the vaccine only triggered a response from your body, it didn't make you sick, and previous immunity may have been due to previous vaccinations. btw im not thumbing you down to shit because of HURR DURR BANDWAGONS THIS GUY'S ANTI-VACC
User avatar #171 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
B-but I'm not anti-vac!
User avatar #113 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
>>#13, >>#23, also, i agree a little with comment 23, in that your reaction (or lack thereof) to the cold or flu is going to be very different from your reaction to a more dangerous disease like measles if you were un-vaccinated.
User avatar #26 - blargchikahonkhonk (04/21/2015) [-]
ye but you only have to get measles or any other serious but preventable disease once. just cause you didnt get any early in your life dosnt mean you wouldn't have caught them later on
User avatar #35 - tomowrath (04/21/2015) [-]
Measles isnt serious fuckboy

0 measles related deaths in past 10 years
User avatar #114 - meganinja (04/22/2015) [-]
0 smallpox deaths in the last 10 years too.

Guess smallpox isn't a serious disease.
#87 - SteyrAUG (04/21/2015) [-]
Yep, sure isn't serious having a bunch of seeping open sores.
User avatar #99 - tomowrath (04/22/2015) [-]
Thats like one of the worst cases.
Normal measles doesnt look like that
User avatar #106 - SteyrAUG (04/22/2015) [-]
Oh, okay.

I suppose mild heart attacks aren't that bad then are they?
User avatar #108 - tomowrath (04/22/2015) [-]
Are you vaccinated?
User avatar #112 - SteyrAUG (04/22/2015) [-]
Of course not. My parents only believe in injecting me with marijuanas to cure all of my ailments.
#82 - Ken M (04/21/2015) [-]
And why do you think that is? You cock-juggling thundercunted mongoloid.
#20 - Ken M (04/21/2015) [-]
You're an idiot.
User avatar #172 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
How do you figure?
#3 - Only because you expect to be different. When we're y…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/21/2015 on Adulthood +19
User avatar #6 - leifbunny (04/22/2015) [-]
I never really got why people thought this would happen. We spend our entire childhoods throwing away fantasies, outgrowing ideologies, and learning that fairy tales aren't real. Why would you refuse to let go of the "sudden and magical gaining of all knowledge" theory when you spend most of your young life trying to gain knowledge in school? Society would just let their children sit around doing nothing until it hit them if that was the c- oh god damn it we're doomed.
#4 - vominmymoutabit (04/22/2015) [-]
That's the most relieving thing I've heard since I turned 20 (just before the start of the year). Some part of me expected to have this sudden epiphany of wisdom and understanding, but when I woke up the next morning I felt exactly the same. It was actually really depressing for quite a while.
User avatar #7 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
'Adult' is just a state of mind, old chap. Wanna be young forever? Nothing wrong with that so long as you're not a drain on society. Likewise, wanna be an adult? You still gotta work for it. Study, better yourself, get some good hobbies like wood-working or botony, or even just having a collection of bathroom stall grafitti. As long as you always go at something with the mindset to learn whatever you can from it, you'll find yourself wiser than people twice your age.
#8 - vominmymoutabit (04/22/2015) [-]
You are wise. Thanks for the advice.
#10 - Remember kids, loli is for hug, not for fug  [+] (9 new replies) 04/21/2015 on top kek +187
User avatar #87 - bortl (04/22/2015) [-]
Your username says something different
User avatar #80 - tysonexplains (04/22/2015) [-]
#66 - hotschurl (04/22/2015) [-]
#59 - blueboysixnine (04/22/2015) [-]
Speak for yourself bruh
User avatar #52 - optimussum (04/22/2015) [-]
muh daughterus
User avatar #44 - vortexrain (04/22/2015) [-]
Then I've been doing them it wrong all these years.
#42 - KievLeviathan (04/22/2015) [-]
#38 - thepizzadevourer (04/22/2015) [-]
Snuggle time~
#20 - vorarephilia (04/21/2015) [-]
#11 - While I am pro-vaccine and always get vaccinated, I just want …  [+] (47 new replies) 04/21/2015 on Vaccine -56
User avatar #288 - twentyseconds (04/22/2015) [-]
>saying real facts
>still being logical and supporting vaccination
>getting thumbed down for no reason

welcome to FJ
User avatar #263 - picamix (04/22/2015) [-]
that would be your immune system fighting back, i think you over exagurated your illness, but vaccines work by giving you a dead strain of the illness and your body's immune system then fights it off so it can then learn how to beat it so next time you come in contact with it, your body will beat it easily causing no illness. but yes you will feel ill as your body is fighting it and trying to remove it from your body
#251 - Ken M (04/22/2015) [-]
Yeah same thing happens to my mom when she gets the flu vaccine for work. She's a nurse I gotta say people on funny junk are fuckwads for thumbing you down. Anything that says vaccines are bad gets that though so whatever.
#233 - Ken M (04/22/2015) [-]
I don't know why people are giving you so much hate; you said you are pro-vaccinations and merely stated your own experience.
User avatar #245 - janeyzombie (04/22/2015) [-]
Well if you take a look at the votes, you can see the first thumb was red, so when the rest of the herd so red, they all started thumbing him down without acknowledging what he's saying at all.

That's FJ.
#254 - gangbangtime (04/22/2015) [-]
It's the summerfags.
Reddit 2.0, just remove thumbs except on content and people might actually have to think on here.
User avatar #255 - janeyzombie (04/22/2015) [-]
Shhh, the angry mob might hear you.
#256 - gangbangtime (04/22/2015) [-]
I don't care. I'm probably moving to 8chan after this site turns to shit, and it's pretty close to doing so.
#184 - Ken M (04/22/2015) [-]
How you gonna get thumbed down for a personal experience? You even said you agree with the retards.
#164 - Ken M (04/22/2015) [-]
Look at all this anecdotal evidence I don't give a shit about!

Maybe... you got infected after your vaccination by a totally unrelated pathogen?

Silly me; that could NEVER happen.

Eat shit moron
User avatar #166 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
What do you mean 'anecdotal evidence'? I'm not against vaccines. Who's the moron now?
User avatar #156 - greyhoundfd (04/22/2015) [-]
The thing to keep in mind is that in many cases the symptoms of a disease are actually the reactions of the immune system against it. Things like vomiting, coughing, sneezing, and soreness are common signs of an immune reaction against something. More likely than not, your immune system identified dead copies of the virus or bacteria within your system, and activated to combat what it perceived as an infection.

The thing to keep in mind is that if you actually had the virus or bacteria you were immunized against, the symptoms would be much worse, much more lengthy, and have much more serious consequences.
User avatar #168 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
You're right, of course. I just wanted to put my own experiences out there.
User avatar #153 - darksideofthebeast (04/22/2015) [-]
>people flaming you because "they're just side effects."
Yea, that is true. But they still fucking suck and can kill you.
User avatar #158 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying that the "side effects" of a vaccine can be deadly?
User avatar #160 - darksideofthebeast (04/22/2015) [-]
Yes, symptoms like that can produce outcomes such as dehydration. Some to the point where you can't control it because eating something will make you throw up more.

Yes, that can happen.
User avatar #163 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
it seems that the caused reactions of vomiting and diarrhea cause the dehydration you're talking about. While these are possible reactions to vaccines, it's extremely uncommon for a reaction to be so severe, and it would probably have to do with an already-existing health problem causing some sort of immune deficiency. whether caused by a disease or a vaccine, though, this would have to be treated like a disease. i'll admit that many sources i could find on this were either unrelated or were overly-dramatic. if you could find examples of people dying from vaccine reactions, i'd like to see what kind of conditions they were in beforehand and such.
User avatar #34 - tomowrath (04/21/2015) [-]
Get ready for your red thumbs motherfucker.

You weren't brainwashed by popular culture enough.

You need to chant "VACCINES ARE GOOD" to be accepted
#182 - innocentbabies (04/22/2015) [-]
Holy fucking shit that is impressive.
#132 - Ken M (04/22/2015) [-]
Missed my chance to thumb so here you go.
#148 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
it's happening...
User avatar #110 - tomowrath (04/22/2015) [-]
kek
#23 - Pred (04/21/2015) [-]
you hopefully however do realize how vaccines work right?

That it's literally crippled bacteria of a disease you want your immune system to learn to fight against.

And the fact that you're feeling uneasy after taking it is a sign of it actually working.

And the fact that your immune system is strong against common flu is completely unrelated, because just as much as it could be strong against common diseases, it could be absolutely destroyed by measles or the likes.
Your strong reaction to the vaccine only shows how vulnerable you were to that disease, despite your high immunity to common flu or cold.
User avatar #169 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
Of course, that's why I get them. I just figure I get sick because my immune system is busy fighting so many dead bugs that a few live ones manage to sneak in.
#223 - rakoom (04/22/2015) [-]
Luckily that's not how it rowks.
User avatar #12 - teevee (04/21/2015) [-]
vaccinations do sometimes cause things like fatigue due to the immune system suddenly responding to an "attack" by making antibodies and building up immunity to the introduces disease. If anything, your reaction to it is a big reason why vaccines are good for you personally; if your body has that bad of a reaction to a weakened strain of the virus, imagine how bad you'd be if you were really infected by things like measles without prior immunization.
User avatar #296 - sciencexplain (04/22/2015) [-]
Godspeed, you're doing the world a justice. I've never seen such a short, concise, perfect response for this in a long time. Too many people turn to research and statistics, but it's such basic logic that is practically inarguable.
User avatar #185 - taniv (04/22/2015) [-]
Well there's also the people who literally can't take vaccines because their body rejects it and the allergic reaction can be fatal, which is more common than some pro-vaxxers think and less common than some anti-vaxxers want to believe. It's for those people that herd immunity is necessary, and vaccines should be mandatory for those who can.
User avatar #174 - pseudobro (04/22/2015) [-]
The virus in many vaccines isn't actually "weakened", but "deactivated", meaning it contains parts of the virus that identify it and that are clearly a foreign body, but will not and cannot make you sick. This is important because a lot of people receiving vaccines have weak immune systems, so even a weak virus could easily infect them.

When people say "I got vaccinated, and then I got sick" it's most likely coincidental, or indirectly linked, i.e. the puncture opening allowed viruses to enter the body.
User avatar #13 - captainfuckitall (04/21/2015) [-]
But I wasn't sick for years prior, even during flu season, even when I was in a house full of sick people and had no problem drinking out of the same cups and such as them. People even joked about how my immune system must be an Olympian just because I never got sick.

Of course I'm not saying vaccines are bad, but it's still unpleasant.
#152 - Visual (04/22/2015) [-]
You're completely missing his point.
User avatar #170 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
Except I'm not. I was just clearing up a misconception.
User avatar #104 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
you typically get vaccinations as a baby; most afterwards are either boosters or for a new strain of flu for that year, and of course some people have both better immune systems and better reactions to vaccines. what i'm saying is that when the weakened strain is injected into your body, it's combined with chemicals to stimulate the immune system to the "threat" which causes some people to get flu-like symtoms for a short while afterwards due to the sudden energy needed to produce antibodies.

any symptoms from diseases like over-active sinuses (runny nose), vomiting, diarrhea, fever, sneezing, couching, etc. are actually bodily reactions to get rid of diseases; not the disease itself. If you didn't have an immune system and were infected with a disease, you'd become extremely fatigued and either get poisoning from bacterial waste or die from organ failure due to cells being destroyed by viruses.

tl;dr: the vaccine only triggered a response from your body, it didn't make you sick, and previous immunity may have been due to previous vaccinations. btw im not thumbing you down to shit because of HURR DURR BANDWAGONS THIS GUY'S ANTI-VACC
User avatar #171 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
B-but I'm not anti-vac!
User avatar #113 - teevee (04/22/2015) [-]
>>#13, >>#23, also, i agree a little with comment 23, in that your reaction (or lack thereof) to the cold or flu is going to be very different from your reaction to a more dangerous disease like measles if you were un-vaccinated.
User avatar #26 - blargchikahonkhonk (04/21/2015) [-]
ye but you only have to get measles or any other serious but preventable disease once. just cause you didnt get any early in your life dosnt mean you wouldn't have caught them later on
User avatar #35 - tomowrath (04/21/2015) [-]
Measles isnt serious fuckboy

0 measles related deaths in past 10 years
User avatar #114 - meganinja (04/22/2015) [-]
0 smallpox deaths in the last 10 years too.

Guess smallpox isn't a serious disease.
#87 - SteyrAUG (04/21/2015) [-]
Yep, sure isn't serious having a bunch of seeping open sores.
User avatar #99 - tomowrath (04/22/2015) [-]
Thats like one of the worst cases.
Normal measles doesnt look like that
User avatar #106 - SteyrAUG (04/22/2015) [-]
Oh, okay.

I suppose mild heart attacks aren't that bad then are they?
User avatar #108 - tomowrath (04/22/2015) [-]
Are you vaccinated?
User avatar #112 - SteyrAUG (04/22/2015) [-]
Of course not. My parents only believe in injecting me with marijuanas to cure all of my ailments.
#82 - Ken M (04/21/2015) [-]
And why do you think that is? You cock-juggling thundercunted mongoloid.
#20 - Ken M (04/21/2015) [-]
You're an idiot.
User avatar #172 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2015) [-]
How do you figure?
#9 - Not so much 'abandon' him, I think. But just that The Joker se… 04/21/2015 on The Killing Joke 0
#46 - Nah, nothing wrong with that old top. I'm genuinely not too ke… 04/21/2015 on jesus +3
#8 - Where the hell is this picture from? I desire to masturbate to it.  [+] (4 new replies) 04/18/2015 on Handy +1
#13 - icekingg (04/18/2015) [-]
It took a bit of digging, but I found the source. The character is Furudo Erika from Umineko no Naku Koro Ni.

Here's Episode one of the anime: www.gogoanime.com/umineko-no-naku-koro-ni-episode-1/2
There are a fuckton of manga series: www.mangahere.co/author/Ryukishi%2007
Enjoy.
#10 - bewailedbadger (04/18/2015) [-]
Lemme know if someone tells you.
User avatar #14 - stickmanz (04/18/2015) [-]
.
#16 - bewailedbadger (04/18/2015) [-]
Cheers
#40 - I've seen this dozens of times, where I meet someone and start… 04/12/2015 on (untitled) -1
#59 - Comment deleted 04/11/2015 on What expensive desserts... 0
#58 - Your pancakes always hit the spot, Aunt Jemima 04/11/2015 on What expensive desserts... +3

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - Ken M (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - Ken M (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
#480 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#479 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#478 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#477 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#476 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - Ken M (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)