Upload
Login or register

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#592
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 78892 total,  96883 ,  17991
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 84.3% (843/1000)
Level 367 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 368 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10927
Total Comments Made:20812
FJ Points:40047

latest user's comments

#144 - Sure it is. 06/28/2016 on """"anti""""-fascists in a... +4
#141 - You used literally wrong, and no, you never said that. Whether…  [+] (8 new replies) 06/28/2016 on """"anti""""-fascists in a... +8
User avatar
#206 - spoopyskeleton (06/28/2016) [-]
I'm just butting in here, but people use "Literally" for emphasis.

I fucking hate how people don't understand this.
User avatar
#208 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
I understand, but it's not 'supposed' to be used that way. It's supposed to describe a literal action.

If literally could just be used for emphasis, then there would be no point to the word to begin with, you see?
User avatar
#210 - spoopyskeleton (06/28/2016) [-]
Yes, but it's doesn't need to be it's literal meaning.
So many words are used for emphasis outside of their respected literal meanings.

I suppose it is a bit different with the word "Literally" but people DO use it for emphasis. There is a high change they do know what it means and are intentionally using it wrong.
User avatar
#212 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
Maybe so, but that's not an excuse.
#153 - anon (06/28/2016) [-]
you're right, dude
User avatar
#143 - destaice (06/28/2016) [-]
No, it is actually what I said. You are just incapable of reading.
#151 - adhdtookmyaccount (06/28/2016) [-]
User avatar
#144 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
Sure it is.
#138 - "Freedom of speech, movement, and rights to arms are real…  [+] (10 new replies) 06/28/2016 on """"anti""""-fascists in a... +5
User avatar
#139 - destaice (06/28/2016) [-]
You literally cannot read.

I said they're manchildren because they do this neo-nazi thing for attention
User avatar
#141 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
You used literally wrong, and no, you never said that. Whether or not you 'implied' it is up for grabs, but it's much more likely you were referring to Neo-Nazism on a whole, considering I doubt your opinion of them improves with their level of fervour.
User avatar
#206 - spoopyskeleton (06/28/2016) [-]
I'm just butting in here, but people use "Literally" for emphasis.

I fucking hate how people don't understand this.
User avatar
#208 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
I understand, but it's not 'supposed' to be used that way. It's supposed to describe a literal action.

If literally could just be used for emphasis, then there would be no point to the word to begin with, you see?
User avatar
#210 - spoopyskeleton (06/28/2016) [-]
Yes, but it's doesn't need to be it's literal meaning.
So many words are used for emphasis outside of their respected literal meanings.

I suppose it is a bit different with the word "Literally" but people DO use it for emphasis. There is a high change they do know what it means and are intentionally using it wrong.
User avatar
#212 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
Maybe so, but that's not an excuse.
#153 - anon (06/28/2016) [-]
you're right, dude
User avatar
#143 - destaice (06/28/2016) [-]
No, it is actually what I said. You are just incapable of reading.
#151 - adhdtookmyaccount (06/28/2016) [-]
User avatar
#144 - captainfuckitall (06/28/2016) [-]
Sure it is.
#32 - When people take pride in the accomplishments of past people's… 06/28/2016 on German fans sang the... +11
#66 - Did you really watch Pride and Prejudice? 06/27/2016 on marriage -3
#18 - As if Funnyjunk would ever hit headlines  [+] (4 new replies) 06/27/2016 on """"anti""""-fascists in a... +1
#25 - slyblade (06/27/2016) [-]
I don't know, they're already after Mr 4Chan.
User avatar
#36 - jaggsauce (06/27/2016) [-]
wow.. that's a pretty high quality gif.
#42 - slyblade (06/27/2016) [-]
I swear it was slower before I uploaded it.
User avatar
#43 - jaggsauce (06/27/2016) [-]
i swear i was being serious.
#16 - The progressives who protest AGAINST free speech don't seem to…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/27/2016 on """"anti""""-fascists in a... +1
User avatar
#17 - platinumaltaria (06/27/2016) [-]
I can see the headlines now: FJ user shocked to learn that progressives are anti-free speech.
User avatar
#18 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2016) [-]
As if Funnyjunk would ever hit headlines
#25 - slyblade (06/27/2016) [-]
I don't know, they're already after Mr 4Chan.
User avatar
#36 - jaggsauce (06/27/2016) [-]
wow.. that's a pretty high quality gif.
#42 - slyblade (06/27/2016) [-]
I swear it was slower before I uploaded it.
User avatar
#43 - jaggsauce (06/27/2016) [-]
i swear i was being serious.
#56 - I wasn't trying to disagree, I was trying to say that putting … 06/27/2016 on marriage 0
#52 - Of course it would, but then it just comes down to your opinio… 06/27/2016 on marriage -1
#49 - "It's safe to say I can't comprehend a Holocaust survivor…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/27/2016 on marriage 0
#53 - anon (06/27/2016) [-]
"I have been in love, and am, my opinion on the topic above hasn't changed, and indeed, has only been refined. Maybe another time it will change, but that is unlikely as there is no cognitive dissonance going on with me (that I know of) and find no reason for my views to be without merit."

You admit your opinion could change due to experience... I think we agree bro
User avatar
#56 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2016) [-]
I wasn't trying to disagree, I was trying to say that putting it all down to whether I experienced it or not, or the depth of my experiences, is faulty.

YOU are saying that the depth of my experience is important because it is a defining factor in my beliefs and principles.

I am saying that the depth of my experiences is irrelevant, since you do not have to directly experience something at all in order to have a well informed or conscious opinion on it.

In another way: You are arguing that my desire to help starving African children is limited in direct correlation to the rate in which I myself have starved, while I am arguing that whether I was starved to bones or fat my entire life, it holds absolutely no sway over my levels of compassion or desire or ideals, as they could just as easily relate back to observations or similar experiences. You see?
#51 - anon (06/27/2016) [-]
You can understand something without experiencing it, I agree. But this understanding will change with actual experience.
User avatar
#52 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2016) [-]
Of course it would, but then it just comes down to your opinion being refined rather than changed.

I have been in love, and am, my opinion on the topic above hasn't changed, and indeed, has only been refined. Maybe another time it will change, but that is unlikely as there is no cognitive dissonance going on with me (that I know of) and find no reason for my views to be without merit.