x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1762
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 59731 total,  73287 ,  13556
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80.8% (808/1000)
Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 354 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10899
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16993
FJ Points:26040

latest user's comments

#145 - I don't think you understand, it's not saying that it's a sin …  [+] (3 new replies) 08/03/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #149 - commontroll (08/03/2013) [-]
A lack of aesthetics? That doesn't mean appreciating beauty and art, that means not having said beauty. That could be taken as feeling as though you don't have any, but given how self-focused satanism is, I wouldn't be surprised if it meant the former. And I never said my opinion was correct or anything, but to me it's the truth. And if you look at it, it honestly is a selfish worldview. It's honestly hardly even a standard, because a standard is something that is achievable, but still having to work for.

Somebody bothered you? DESTROY HIM! Somebody didn't respect you? Humiliate him!

Those aren't rules, those are the natural instincts that we as humans have in us because we're petty, shallow, and selfish. But we also all have a drive to be more than just human, and to be better than that. Well, most of us do, sociopaths obviously have trouble with that, and that's understandable since it's a genuine disorder.
User avatar #169 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Okay, you obviously didn't get it so I will explain it to you again

A lack of aesthetics is a SIN in Satanism, because it means you do NOT appreciate beauty, and that is BAD, as the definition of aesthetics is a standard and appreciation of beauty or the principles of beauty (as stated below), it's just saying that you should APPRECIATE things you find beautiful for whatever reason, as beauty conveys a number of different spectrum's. "To me it's the truth" is an oxymoron, as if it were truth it wouldn't be just for you. It's just your opinion, but the problem is your opinion is uninformed and unresearched, THAT is why it is wrong, because you see "A lack of aesthetics is a sin" in a way it's NOT supposed to be taken. That's like thinking someone is bad because of a lie you were told about them, which we can all agree is wrong

"Somebody continued to bother you? Destroy them. Somebody didn't offer you respect? Don't offer any in return". THOSE are the real rules, and it just states plain and simply "You don't have to put up with the shit people throw at you, nor should you". Respect IS a two way street, if someone doesn't give any to you, you are not obligated to give any to them. If someone ignores you or doesn't listen, MAKE them listen. This is how you get shit done, simple as that

The problem is not your opinion, it's that you got your opinion from an uninformed and narrow perception of what it is actually saying
User avatar #177 - commontroll (08/03/2013) [-]
Destroying somebody isn't the only way to not put up with something. You can also ignore them or put them in their place calmly.

But, whatever, both of us are set in our views, and we'll only both get agitated if we continue this. Sorry if I offended you sir. May your days be plentiful, and your axe always sharp. (I think those kinds of goodbyes need to make a comeback.)
#143 - It's odd that you say "That's not what Satanism is" … 08/03/2013 on Satanists 0
#9 - What the hell kinda person names a cat 'Bill'  [+] (1 new reply) 08/03/2013 on What came in the mail today? +2
#13 - anonymous (08/03/2013) [-]
Bill's wife... Mrs. Clinton.
#35 - You didn't even have to read all the way down to know that the… 08/03/2013 on how groups/squads end up in... +2
#51 - Well that was a pleasant turn of events. Thank you, you now ha…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/03/2013 on Satanists +5
#52 - crazyeyedbioll (08/03/2013) [-]
Indeed. A good day to you sir
#50 - For the record. Theistic Satanism is actually nearly the same … 08/03/2013 on Satanists +18
#47 - I knew it was a joke, I was just clarifying what it was about …  [+] (3 new replies) 08/03/2013 on Satanists +15
#48 - crazyeyedbioll (08/03/2013) [-]
Good comeback! You have my respect good sir, a waving bear for you.
User avatar #51 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Well that was a pleasant turn of events. Thank you, you now have my respect as well for having a good sense of humour and being able to take things lightly
#52 - crazyeyedbioll (08/03/2013) [-]
Indeed. A good day to you sir
#46 - How's it going not being able to come up with original jokes? 08/03/2013 on Satanists +9
#44 - If you join Satanism to seem cool and have the appreciation of…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/03/2013 on Satanists +7
User avatar #45 - crazyeyedbioll (08/03/2013) [-]
Its a joke, not a penis. Dont take it so hard.
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
I knew it was a joke, I was just clarifying what it was about

It's an opinion, not your ex. Don't whine about it so much
#48 - crazyeyedbioll (08/03/2013) [-]
Good comeback! You have my respect good sir, a waving bear for you.
User avatar #51 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Well that was a pleasant turn of events. Thank you, you now have my respect as well for having a good sense of humour and being able to take things lightly
#52 - crazyeyedbioll (08/03/2013) [-]
Indeed. A good day to you sir
#43 - Actually, I've also read the Satanic bible and it doesn't say …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/03/2013 on Satanists +1
User avatar #192 - timmywankenobi (08/04/2013) [-]
well it open to a bit of interpretation but fair enough.
#42 - It may be hard for you to believe, but there is such a thing c… 08/03/2013 on Satanists +5
#330 - That's one hell of a cop out. I'm honestly surprised you can d…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/03/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #332 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
So you're gonna stick with that answer, then?
#328 - Very well then, you make a good point. I take that argument ba…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/03/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #329 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
I have no desire to thoroughly debunk every one of your claims. See "Gish Gallop"
#326 - No, I'm suggesting you're bias because you refuse to acknowled… 08/03/2013 on (1881) 0
#325 - Anyways, I said it because it's true. The majority of America …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/03/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #327 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The majority of America IS a denomination of Christianity. Whether you want to label it something else or not is irrelevant. Your statement of "is a very firm difference" is deliberate misdirection by intentionally making it seem like something else is the case, which is a blatant lie on your part in an attempt to move Christianity from the majority.
#322 - Oh, okay. I suppose your opinion over-rules common theme then.…  [+] (15 new replies) 08/03/2013 on (1881) -1
User avatar #323 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Are you kidding? What does any of that have to do with this? And are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that most of America is NOT Christian, but in fact just "believes in a god"? Is that actually something you're saying? That's pathetic.
User avatar #340 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I find it funny that you say they have no merit when you only focused on ONE of them, of that one, you also claimed had no merit. Yet you had no trouble focusing on that one (and bringing it up later as well, including an argument for how you one based upon the single point out of my many)

You're running out of excuses
User avatar #338 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
*Won, sorry. I'm quite tired
User avatar #337 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
How convenient that you use my attitude at YOUR unwillingness to address the rest of my points to escape so you don't have to address the rest of my points. It doesn't matter anyways, YOU were the one who was so adamant against me, and YOU are the one who has to prove me wrong which you still haven't done. By all debating logic I'm actually in the right and have one this debate. Not even by forfeit, just by your pretentiousness that you're too 'good' to answer the rest of my statements (again, quite convenient for you, considering you probably can't).
User avatar #339 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
I never said I was too good to answer. I tried. But you're too thick to accept that your statements have no merit.
User avatar #335 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I already said below, if you would have bothered to read the comment, that you were correct and I took the point back

Comment #328 to which you already replied that you had no desire to debunk the rest of my claims, then told me to see Gish Gallop

I replied saying that was one hell of a copout, which it was; and that it was selfish of you to not humour me, yet expect me to humour you. Yet, despite all this, I'm near certain you feel that you are still less of a dick than myself, and have the upper-hand
User avatar #336 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
There is no upper hand with you, and this seems like one long exercise in futility. I'm willing to have this kind of conversation with most anyone, but not indefinitely, and since it seems like this is going nowhere and you seem to fail to recognize your inherent bias against atheists being.....well......atheists......I'm withdrawing from this conversation.
User avatar #333 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
The same way you're gonna stick to yours. I just find it interesting how you are unwilling to even TRY to 'debunk' any of my previous points (obviously because you're simply above it), yet you think it should be my responsibility to look up a term so my effort can prove that you're right

Unfortunately for you I did look it up, because I'm not a lazy, self-entitled twat, and it does not prove you right. The argument is that because I 'drowned you in half truths', you automatically win, yet I only gave you ONE point that could possibly be considered a 'half truth', and when you made that point I took it back. You STILL have all the others which are based upon total fact

So yes, that is my answer, and no, I'm not changing it.
User avatar #334 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
You're gonna go with saying that America is NOT, in fact, a majority Christian denominations, but instead just "religious".
User avatar #330 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
That's one hell of a cop out. I'm honestly surprised you can do that while still maintaining the arrogance to think you're the one in the right
User avatar #332 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
So you're gonna stick with that answer, then?
User avatar #328 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Very well then, you make a good point. I take that argument back

The other points still stand
User avatar #329 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
I have no desire to thoroughly debunk every one of your claims. See "Gish Gallop"
User avatar #325 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Anyways, I said it because it's true. The majority of America does not identify as 'christian', whether or whether not they believe in a god is irrelevant. The same way you can believe in a god, but declare yourself 'Atheist' because you simply don't care or don't worship or don't think it has any effect. Yes, it is something I'm saying

If it honestly had no basis in this argument, you wouldn't be as upset as you are. Furthermore, I like how you call me pathetic for 1/6 of my argument (seeing as how it was part of a much bigger paragraph) while YOU are the one who caught only that, refused to reply to any other point, and continue to thumb down my comments in a childish manner
User avatar #327 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The majority of America IS a denomination of Christianity. Whether you want to label it something else or not is irrelevant. Your statement of "is a very firm difference" is deliberate misdirection by intentionally making it seem like something else is the case, which is a blatant lie on your part in an attempt to move Christianity from the majority.
#320 - Actually, the first Atheist in this thread did. As do some oth…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/03/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #324 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
You're suggesting I'm biased by stating something everyone else is saying. Rather than everyone else being biased, you're just wrong.
User avatar #326 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
No, I'm suggesting you're bias because you refuse to acknowledge anyone taking my side, and refuse to see that it's unjust to punish one person for having an opinion and exhault another simply because you agree (or disagree) with it. You're also quite obviously an Atheist, and you showed a lot of aggression and negativity (and still do, but more so when) you thought I was christian. You're also adamant that the poster was acting completely rationally by making a mockery out of his Aunt's faith, going on to say that it wasn't over the top or undeserved at all (implying all Atheists do or should act that way) yet you're upset with me because I also made a mockery of faith and saying it was completely unjustified and I cannot be redeemed despite my calm demenour, manner, argument, and civility even toward those insulting me

That's why you're bias
#314 - Again, if that's not over the top, you're implying that's how …  [+] (17 new replies) 08/03/2013 on (1881) -1
User avatar #316 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
No, they don't. You could be actively being a jerk, and someone calls it out. After that point, you say that they're the one being worse than you.

That's why you're a hypocrite.

The answer to your question is "No, that statement is false, but atheists are far more widely despised and ridiculed than Christians, at least within the United States, and often are made fun of for things that were not offensive, while the same Christians do worse things and call it religious freedom."
User avatar #322 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Oh, okay. I suppose your opinion over-rules common theme then. Just as well, I didn't say 'they' are being worse. I said 'they' are being hypocritical by allowing the circumstances of one insult to slide, but not another, simply because of bias. I said YOU are being worse than me because you are generalizing, assuming, putting words in my mouth, speaking for others, and debating more with emotion and feeling than with logic and reason.

You don't understand what 'hypocrite' means, do you? A hypocrite is: "Someone who engages in the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense." I never said it was wrong for someone to reply rudely to me, what I said was wrong was that someone values their own spiritual or theological beliefs more than another's based upon the same amount of evidence. That's why I'm NOT a hypocrite

Now YOU'RE the one playing the victim, as that type of behaviour happens everywhere. Here in Canada, there are far more Atheists (or at the very least, 'spiritualists' and 'agnostics') than any other religious background and religious people are often mocked for their beliefs. If you were a christian in the middle east or Eastern Asia, you would be mocked or ridiculed. The most 'Atheist' place in the world is Vietnam with a population of (I forget the exact number, but somewhere between) 78%-92% and you would be mocked for holding religious beliefs there. Being a victim does not allow you to have more rights or privileges than another, nor does being a persecutor. Besides, in a recent poll, more people actually identify with 'believing in god' than 'being christian' in America, of which there is a very firm difference.

If you do not believe it is okay for christians to mock Atheists, why do you believe it's okay for Atheists to mock christians? By making exceptions to your own beliefs and ostracizing others for theirs, you are no different than those who treat you unjustly
User avatar #323 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Are you kidding? What does any of that have to do with this? And are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that most of America is NOT Christian, but in fact just "believes in a god"? Is that actually something you're saying? That's pathetic.
User avatar #340 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I find it funny that you say they have no merit when you only focused on ONE of them, of that one, you also claimed had no merit. Yet you had no trouble focusing on that one (and bringing it up later as well, including an argument for how you one based upon the single point out of my many)

You're running out of excuses
User avatar #338 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
*Won, sorry. I'm quite tired
User avatar #337 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
How convenient that you use my attitude at YOUR unwillingness to address the rest of my points to escape so you don't have to address the rest of my points. It doesn't matter anyways, YOU were the one who was so adamant against me, and YOU are the one who has to prove me wrong which you still haven't done. By all debating logic I'm actually in the right and have one this debate. Not even by forfeit, just by your pretentiousness that you're too 'good' to answer the rest of my statements (again, quite convenient for you, considering you probably can't).
User avatar #339 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
I never said I was too good to answer. I tried. But you're too thick to accept that your statements have no merit.
User avatar #335 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I already said below, if you would have bothered to read the comment, that you were correct and I took the point back

Comment #328 to which you already replied that you had no desire to debunk the rest of my claims, then told me to see Gish Gallop

I replied saying that was one hell of a copout, which it was; and that it was selfish of you to not humour me, yet expect me to humour you. Yet, despite all this, I'm near certain you feel that you are still less of a dick than myself, and have the upper-hand
User avatar #336 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
There is no upper hand with you, and this seems like one long exercise in futility. I'm willing to have this kind of conversation with most anyone, but not indefinitely, and since it seems like this is going nowhere and you seem to fail to recognize your inherent bias against atheists being.....well......atheists......I'm withdrawing from this conversation.
User avatar #333 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
The same way you're gonna stick to yours. I just find it interesting how you are unwilling to even TRY to 'debunk' any of my previous points (obviously because you're simply above it), yet you think it should be my responsibility to look up a term so my effort can prove that you're right

Unfortunately for you I did look it up, because I'm not a lazy, self-entitled twat, and it does not prove you right. The argument is that because I 'drowned you in half truths', you automatically win, yet I only gave you ONE point that could possibly be considered a 'half truth', and when you made that point I took it back. You STILL have all the others which are based upon total fact

So yes, that is my answer, and no, I'm not changing it.
User avatar #334 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
You're gonna go with saying that America is NOT, in fact, a majority Christian denominations, but instead just "religious".
User avatar #330 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
That's one hell of a cop out. I'm honestly surprised you can do that while still maintaining the arrogance to think you're the one in the right
User avatar #332 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
So you're gonna stick with that answer, then?
User avatar #328 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Very well then, you make a good point. I take that argument back

The other points still stand
User avatar #329 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
I have no desire to thoroughly debunk every one of your claims. See "Gish Gallop"
User avatar #325 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Anyways, I said it because it's true. The majority of America does not identify as 'christian', whether or whether not they believe in a god is irrelevant. The same way you can believe in a god, but declare yourself 'Atheist' because you simply don't care or don't worship or don't think it has any effect. Yes, it is something I'm saying

If it honestly had no basis in this argument, you wouldn't be as upset as you are. Furthermore, I like how you call me pathetic for 1/6 of my argument (seeing as how it was part of a much bigger paragraph) while YOU are the one who caught only that, refused to reply to any other point, and continue to thumb down my comments in a childish manner
User avatar #327 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The majority of America IS a denomination of Christianity. Whether you want to label it something else or not is irrelevant. Your statement of "is a very firm difference" is deliberate misdirection by intentionally making it seem like something else is the case, which is a blatant lie on your part in an attempt to move Christianity from the majority.
#311 - Your bias is sticking through like a sore thumb  [+] (4 new replies) 08/03/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #315 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Nobody else agrees with you.
User avatar #320 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Actually, the first Atheist in this thread did. As do some others; the amount of red thumbs bestowed mean nothing as after a point it stops being "I'm thumbing this guy down because I dislike his opinion" to "I'm thumbing this guy down because he has a lot of red thumbs and I want to see how many he can get", similar to what happens when a person gets a lot of green thumbs

Don't deny it, I have done it, and I know you have too. This site is populated by the young and immature after-all

Sorry to burst your bubble
User avatar #324 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
You're suggesting I'm biased by stating something everyone else is saying. Rather than everyone else being biased, you're just wrong.
User avatar #326 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
No, I'm suggesting you're bias because you refuse to acknowledge anyone taking my side, and refuse to see that it's unjust to punish one person for having an opinion and exhault another simply because you agree (or disagree) with it. You're also quite obviously an Atheist, and you showed a lot of aggression and negativity (and still do, but more so when) you thought I was christian. You're also adamant that the poster was acting completely rationally by making a mockery out of his Aunt's faith, going on to say that it wasn't over the top or undeserved at all (implying all Atheists do or should act that way) yet you're upset with me because I also made a mockery of faith and saying it was completely unjustified and I cannot be redeemed despite my calm demenour, manner, argument, and civility even toward those insulting me

That's why you're bias
#305 - *Mad Not made. That's just silly 08/02/2013 on (1881) 0
#304 - Lemme help straighten that out for you: I made the or…  [+] (20 new replies) 08/02/2013 on (1881) -1
User avatar #307 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
You didn't make fun of over-the-top atheists. You singled out the man from the story, and he is not over the top by any means. And somehow you act like someone calling you out on it is more disrespectful than your original comment.
User avatar #314 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Again, if that's not over the top, you're implying that's how Atheists USUALLY act, which (I certainly hope) is not true. Furthermore, I never complained about anyone 'calling me out' because nobody did. To 'call someone out' they have to be deliberately hiding their offensiveness, and good gods if I was trying to do that I'm the least subtle person on Earth. Besides, again, I never complained about what anyone said to me or replied, nor did I think anything they said to me was disrespectful; what I thought was disrespectful was they were mocking a certain type of faith while believing they themselves were better for the faith they had

You still haven't replied to my question, by the way. In case you forgot "So it's okay to make fun of religious people, but not okay to make fun of Atheists?"
User avatar #316 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
No, they don't. You could be actively being a jerk, and someone calls it out. After that point, you say that they're the one being worse than you.

That's why you're a hypocrite.

The answer to your question is "No, that statement is false, but atheists are far more widely despised and ridiculed than Christians, at least within the United States, and often are made fun of for things that were not offensive, while the same Christians do worse things and call it religious freedom."
User avatar #322 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Oh, okay. I suppose your opinion over-rules common theme then. Just as well, I didn't say 'they' are being worse. I said 'they' are being hypocritical by allowing the circumstances of one insult to slide, but not another, simply because of bias. I said YOU are being worse than me because you are generalizing, assuming, putting words in my mouth, speaking for others, and debating more with emotion and feeling than with logic and reason.

You don't understand what 'hypocrite' means, do you? A hypocrite is: "Someone who engages in the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense." I never said it was wrong for someone to reply rudely to me, what I said was wrong was that someone values their own spiritual or theological beliefs more than another's based upon the same amount of evidence. That's why I'm NOT a hypocrite

Now YOU'RE the one playing the victim, as that type of behaviour happens everywhere. Here in Canada, there are far more Atheists (or at the very least, 'spiritualists' and 'agnostics') than any other religious background and religious people are often mocked for their beliefs. If you were a christian in the middle east or Eastern Asia, you would be mocked or ridiculed. The most 'Atheist' place in the world is Vietnam with a population of (I forget the exact number, but somewhere between) 78%-92% and you would be mocked for holding religious beliefs there. Being a victim does not allow you to have more rights or privileges than another, nor does being a persecutor. Besides, in a recent poll, more people actually identify with 'believing in god' than 'being christian' in America, of which there is a very firm difference.

If you do not believe it is okay for christians to mock Atheists, why do you believe it's okay for Atheists to mock christians? By making exceptions to your own beliefs and ostracizing others for theirs, you are no different than those who treat you unjustly
User avatar #323 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Are you kidding? What does any of that have to do with this? And are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that most of America is NOT Christian, but in fact just "believes in a god"? Is that actually something you're saying? That's pathetic.
User avatar #340 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I find it funny that you say they have no merit when you only focused on ONE of them, of that one, you also claimed had no merit. Yet you had no trouble focusing on that one (and bringing it up later as well, including an argument for how you one based upon the single point out of my many)

You're running out of excuses
User avatar #338 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
*Won, sorry. I'm quite tired
User avatar #337 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
How convenient that you use my attitude at YOUR unwillingness to address the rest of my points to escape so you don't have to address the rest of my points. It doesn't matter anyways, YOU were the one who was so adamant against me, and YOU are the one who has to prove me wrong which you still haven't done. By all debating logic I'm actually in the right and have one this debate. Not even by forfeit, just by your pretentiousness that you're too 'good' to answer the rest of my statements (again, quite convenient for you, considering you probably can't).
User avatar #339 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
I never said I was too good to answer. I tried. But you're too thick to accept that your statements have no merit.
User avatar #335 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I already said below, if you would have bothered to read the comment, that you were correct and I took the point back

Comment #328 to which you already replied that you had no desire to debunk the rest of my claims, then told me to see Gish Gallop

I replied saying that was one hell of a copout, which it was; and that it was selfish of you to not humour me, yet expect me to humour you. Yet, despite all this, I'm near certain you feel that you are still less of a dick than myself, and have the upper-hand
User avatar #336 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
There is no upper hand with you, and this seems like one long exercise in futility. I'm willing to have this kind of conversation with most anyone, but not indefinitely, and since it seems like this is going nowhere and you seem to fail to recognize your inherent bias against atheists being.....well......atheists......I'm withdrawing from this conversation.
User avatar #333 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
The same way you're gonna stick to yours. I just find it interesting how you are unwilling to even TRY to 'debunk' any of my previous points (obviously because you're simply above it), yet you think it should be my responsibility to look up a term so my effort can prove that you're right

Unfortunately for you I did look it up, because I'm not a lazy, self-entitled twat, and it does not prove you right. The argument is that because I 'drowned you in half truths', you automatically win, yet I only gave you ONE point that could possibly be considered a 'half truth', and when you made that point I took it back. You STILL have all the others which are based upon total fact

So yes, that is my answer, and no, I'm not changing it.
User avatar #334 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
You're gonna go with saying that America is NOT, in fact, a majority Christian denominations, but instead just "religious".
User avatar #330 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
That's one hell of a cop out. I'm honestly surprised you can do that while still maintaining the arrogance to think you're the one in the right
User avatar #332 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
So you're gonna stick with that answer, then?
User avatar #328 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Very well then, you make a good point. I take that argument back

The other points still stand
User avatar #329 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
I have no desire to thoroughly debunk every one of your claims. See "Gish Gallop"
User avatar #325 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Anyways, I said it because it's true. The majority of America does not identify as 'christian', whether or whether not they believe in a god is irrelevant. The same way you can believe in a god, but declare yourself 'Atheist' because you simply don't care or don't worship or don't think it has any effect. Yes, it is something I'm saying

If it honestly had no basis in this argument, you wouldn't be as upset as you are. Furthermore, I like how you call me pathetic for 1/6 of my argument (seeing as how it was part of a much bigger paragraph) while YOU are the one who caught only that, refused to reply to any other point, and continue to thumb down my comments in a childish manner
User avatar #327 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The majority of America IS a denomination of Christianity. Whether you want to label it something else or not is irrelevant. Your statement of "is a very firm difference" is deliberate misdirection by intentionally making it seem like something else is the case, which is a blatant lie on your part in an attempt to move Christianity from the majority.
User avatar #305 - captainfuckitall (08/02/2013) [-]
*Mad

Not made. That's just silly
#303 - So ALL Atheists are that rude and disrespectful? I never knew that  [+] (6 new replies) 08/02/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #306 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The man in this story was not rude OR disrespectful.
User avatar #311 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Your bias is sticking through like a sore thumb
User avatar #315 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Nobody else agrees with you.
User avatar #320 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Actually, the first Atheist in this thread did. As do some others; the amount of red thumbs bestowed mean nothing as after a point it stops being "I'm thumbing this guy down because I dislike his opinion" to "I'm thumbing this guy down because he has a lot of red thumbs and I want to see how many he can get", similar to what happens when a person gets a lot of green thumbs

Don't deny it, I have done it, and I know you have too. This site is populated by the young and immature after-all

Sorry to burst your bubble
User avatar #324 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
You're suggesting I'm biased by stating something everyone else is saying. Rather than everyone else being biased, you're just wrong.
User avatar #326 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
No, I'm suggesting you're bias because you refuse to acknowledge anyone taking my side, and refuse to see that it's unjust to punish one person for having an opinion and exhault another simply because you agree (or disagree) with it. You're also quite obviously an Atheist, and you showed a lot of aggression and negativity (and still do, but more so when) you thought I was christian. You're also adamant that the poster was acting completely rationally by making a mockery out of his Aunt's faith, going on to say that it wasn't over the top or undeserved at all (implying all Atheists do or should act that way) yet you're upset with me because I also made a mockery of faith and saying it was completely unjustified and I cannot be redeemed despite my calm demenour, manner, argument, and civility even toward those insulting me

That's why you're bias
#296 - I like how you got the message that I felt I was being persecu…  [+] (30 new replies) 08/02/2013 on (1881) -1
User avatar #302 - YllekNayr (08/02/2013) [-]
But lemme just get something straight:

You make that original comment, and in response I say none of your comments can redeem you from it, and that you're being a dick and acting persecuted.

This means I am MORE of a dick than you? What universe do you live in where saying something similar and lesser makes you worse?

You're a hypocrite now, as well, for wanting to make those sorts of comments and then act like anyone else that says something similar about you is being mean.
User avatar #304 - captainfuckitall (08/02/2013) [-]
Lemme help straighten that out for you:

I made the original comment belittling over-the-top-Atheists (who are apparently ALL Atheists), everyone got made because they felt their opinions were more important than the opinions of others ("It's okay to make fun of religious people, but not Atheists"), and then you believe I'm acting like I'm persecuted despite the fact I never said anything about myself besides my personal attitude to it

Seeing as how YOU are generalizing Atheists (rather than myself), YOU are acting rude while in my comments above you can see I am more than willing to be civil and respectful, and YOU feel that Atheists are more entitled than religious people, yes, you are more of a dick than myself. Apparently not the same universe where being polite across the board is a good thing

Again, the post made fun of over-the-top christians, cool, I made fun of over-the-top Atheists, not so cool apparently. It's not my fault everyone chose to take it so personally and completely ignore the hypocrisy; and furthermore I never said anyone else was being rude or mean. I never complained about what people said, I never used logical fallacies, I was never rude without someone being rude to me first, and I never complained about the massive amount of red thumbs I get, and continue to get, while everyone else has green up the ying-yang because I understand that's what happens when you post a controversial comment. So no, I am not hypocritical. YOU on the other hand still have yet to answer my original question and continue to dodge my statements while putting words in my mouth and seeing things from an ill-perceived angle. I don't BLAME you for that, as it's only natural to get ruffled when someone insults something you're into, but I would at least expect you to act civilized and think with a cool, clear head without using insults, especially when you're trying to defend something you believe in due to rationality and logic
User avatar #307 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
You didn't make fun of over-the-top atheists. You singled out the man from the story, and he is not over the top by any means. And somehow you act like someone calling you out on it is more disrespectful than your original comment.
User avatar #314 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Again, if that's not over the top, you're implying that's how Atheists USUALLY act, which (I certainly hope) is not true. Furthermore, I never complained about anyone 'calling me out' because nobody did. To 'call someone out' they have to be deliberately hiding their offensiveness, and good gods if I was trying to do that I'm the least subtle person on Earth. Besides, again, I never complained about what anyone said to me or replied, nor did I think anything they said to me was disrespectful; what I thought was disrespectful was they were mocking a certain type of faith while believing they themselves were better for the faith they had

You still haven't replied to my question, by the way. In case you forgot "So it's okay to make fun of religious people, but not okay to make fun of Atheists?"
User avatar #316 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
No, they don't. You could be actively being a jerk, and someone calls it out. After that point, you say that they're the one being worse than you.

That's why you're a hypocrite.

The answer to your question is "No, that statement is false, but atheists are far more widely despised and ridiculed than Christians, at least within the United States, and often are made fun of for things that were not offensive, while the same Christians do worse things and call it religious freedom."
User avatar #322 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Oh, okay. I suppose your opinion over-rules common theme then. Just as well, I didn't say 'they' are being worse. I said 'they' are being hypocritical by allowing the circumstances of one insult to slide, but not another, simply because of bias. I said YOU are being worse than me because you are generalizing, assuming, putting words in my mouth, speaking for others, and debating more with emotion and feeling than with logic and reason.

You don't understand what 'hypocrite' means, do you? A hypocrite is: "Someone who engages in the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense." I never said it was wrong for someone to reply rudely to me, what I said was wrong was that someone values their own spiritual or theological beliefs more than another's based upon the same amount of evidence. That's why I'm NOT a hypocrite

Now YOU'RE the one playing the victim, as that type of behaviour happens everywhere. Here in Canada, there are far more Atheists (or at the very least, 'spiritualists' and 'agnostics') than any other religious background and religious people are often mocked for their beliefs. If you were a christian in the middle east or Eastern Asia, you would be mocked or ridiculed. The most 'Atheist' place in the world is Vietnam with a population of (I forget the exact number, but somewhere between) 78%-92% and you would be mocked for holding religious beliefs there. Being a victim does not allow you to have more rights or privileges than another, nor does being a persecutor. Besides, in a recent poll, more people actually identify with 'believing in god' than 'being christian' in America, of which there is a very firm difference.

If you do not believe it is okay for christians to mock Atheists, why do you believe it's okay for Atheists to mock christians? By making exceptions to your own beliefs and ostracizing others for theirs, you are no different than those who treat you unjustly
User avatar #323 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Are you kidding? What does any of that have to do with this? And are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that most of America is NOT Christian, but in fact just "believes in a god"? Is that actually something you're saying? That's pathetic.
User avatar #340 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I find it funny that you say they have no merit when you only focused on ONE of them, of that one, you also claimed had no merit. Yet you had no trouble focusing on that one (and bringing it up later as well, including an argument for how you one based upon the single point out of my many)

You're running out of excuses
User avatar #338 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
*Won, sorry. I'm quite tired
User avatar #337 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
How convenient that you use my attitude at YOUR unwillingness to address the rest of my points to escape so you don't have to address the rest of my points. It doesn't matter anyways, YOU were the one who was so adamant against me, and YOU are the one who has to prove me wrong which you still haven't done. By all debating logic I'm actually in the right and have one this debate. Not even by forfeit, just by your pretentiousness that you're too 'good' to answer the rest of my statements (again, quite convenient for you, considering you probably can't).
User avatar #339 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
I never said I was too good to answer. I tried. But you're too thick to accept that your statements have no merit.
User avatar #335 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I already said below, if you would have bothered to read the comment, that you were correct and I took the point back

Comment #328 to which you already replied that you had no desire to debunk the rest of my claims, then told me to see Gish Gallop

I replied saying that was one hell of a copout, which it was; and that it was selfish of you to not humour me, yet expect me to humour you. Yet, despite all this, I'm near certain you feel that you are still less of a dick than myself, and have the upper-hand
User avatar #336 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
There is no upper hand with you, and this seems like one long exercise in futility. I'm willing to have this kind of conversation with most anyone, but not indefinitely, and since it seems like this is going nowhere and you seem to fail to recognize your inherent bias against atheists being.....well......atheists......I'm withdrawing from this conversation.
User avatar #333 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
The same way you're gonna stick to yours. I just find it interesting how you are unwilling to even TRY to 'debunk' any of my previous points (obviously because you're simply above it), yet you think it should be my responsibility to look up a term so my effort can prove that you're right

Unfortunately for you I did look it up, because I'm not a lazy, self-entitled twat, and it does not prove you right. The argument is that because I 'drowned you in half truths', you automatically win, yet I only gave you ONE point that could possibly be considered a 'half truth', and when you made that point I took it back. You STILL have all the others which are based upon total fact

So yes, that is my answer, and no, I'm not changing it.
User avatar #334 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
You're gonna go with saying that America is NOT, in fact, a majority Christian denominations, but instead just "religious".
User avatar #330 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
That's one hell of a cop out. I'm honestly surprised you can do that while still maintaining the arrogance to think you're the one in the right
User avatar #332 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
So you're gonna stick with that answer, then?
User avatar #328 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Very well then, you make a good point. I take that argument back

The other points still stand
User avatar #329 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
I have no desire to thoroughly debunk every one of your claims. See "Gish Gallop"
User avatar #325 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Anyways, I said it because it's true. The majority of America does not identify as 'christian', whether or whether not they believe in a god is irrelevant. The same way you can believe in a god, but declare yourself 'Atheist' because you simply don't care or don't worship or don't think it has any effect. Yes, it is something I'm saying

If it honestly had no basis in this argument, you wouldn't be as upset as you are. Furthermore, I like how you call me pathetic for 1/6 of my argument (seeing as how it was part of a much bigger paragraph) while YOU are the one who caught only that, refused to reply to any other point, and continue to thumb down my comments in a childish manner
User avatar #327 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The majority of America IS a denomination of Christianity. Whether you want to label it something else or not is irrelevant. Your statement of "is a very firm difference" is deliberate misdirection by intentionally making it seem like something else is the case, which is a blatant lie on your part in an attempt to move Christianity from the majority.
User avatar #305 - captainfuckitall (08/02/2013) [-]
*Mad

Not made. That's just silly
User avatar #301 - YllekNayr (08/02/2013) [-]
No, you made fun of any atheist, seeing as the atheist in the post was anything but over the top, yet you still felt it accurate to call him edgy and generally belittle him.
User avatar #303 - captainfuckitall (08/02/2013) [-]
So ALL Atheists are that rude and disrespectful? I never knew that
User avatar #306 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
The man in this story was not rude OR disrespectful.
User avatar #311 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Your bias is sticking through like a sore thumb
User avatar #315 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
Nobody else agrees with you.
User avatar #320 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
Actually, the first Atheist in this thread did. As do some others; the amount of red thumbs bestowed mean nothing as after a point it stops being "I'm thumbing this guy down because I dislike his opinion" to "I'm thumbing this guy down because he has a lot of red thumbs and I want to see how many he can get", similar to what happens when a person gets a lot of green thumbs

Don't deny it, I have done it, and I know you have too. This site is populated by the young and immature after-all

Sorry to burst your bubble
User avatar #324 - YllekNayr (08/03/2013) [-]
You're suggesting I'm biased by stating something everyone else is saying. Rather than everyone else being biased, you're just wrong.
User avatar #326 - captainfuckitall (08/03/2013) [-]
No, I'm suggesting you're bias because you refuse to acknowledge anyone taking my side, and refuse to see that it's unjust to punish one person for having an opinion and exhault another simply because you agree (or disagree) with it. You're also quite obviously an Atheist, and you showed a lot of aggression and negativity (and still do, but more so when) you thought I was christian. You're also adamant that the poster was acting completely rationally by making a mockery out of his Aunt's faith, going on to say that it wasn't over the top or undeserved at all (implying all Atheists do or should act that way) yet you're upset with me because I also made a mockery of faith and saying it was completely unjustified and I cannot be redeemed despite my calm demenour, manner, argument, and civility even toward those insulting me

That's why you're bias
#294 - Wow, I haven't been called a loser in a long time. Good for yo… 08/02/2013 on (1881) +1
#293 - Eh, if you say so; frankly I'm not the one getting my panties … 08/02/2013 on (1881) 0

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
Latest users (1): comicexplain, anonymous(2).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
#480 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#479 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#478 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#477 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#476 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)