Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

captainfuckitall    

Rank #355 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 346 Comments: Sold Soul
Offline
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#355
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 34 total,  90 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 48677 total,  59660 ,  10983
Content Level Progress: 66.1% (39/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 4.1% (41/1000)
Level 346 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 347 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:21
Content Views:9684
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14743
FJ Points:18266

latest user's comments

#15 - Implying acting like a slut and fighting over the most petty o… 08/06/2013 on This is so me +1
#19 - Implying there's not, when the multiverse is infinite  [+] (21 new replies) 08/06/2013 on This is what humor was... +4
User avatar #227 - revanthewin (08/07/2013) [-]
But what if there's a universe where the multiverse doesn't exist?!
User avatar #231 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
There is, in a sense. A universe that has either never come up with the theory, or is unable to cross into any other universe.
#143 - raigen (08/07/2013) [-]
Mfw infinite multiverse theory on my brain
User avatar #21 - eiaisqzbsesb (08/06/2013) [-]
Infinite alternate universes theory, It's an impossibility that every religion doesn't have a universe of their own where that religion works perfectly. Weather our universe is one of them, we still can't say for certain.

I'm not part of any religion as of now.
#64 - 4chan refugee (08/06/2013) [-]
String theory could very well exist thats the fucked up thing about it.
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (08/06/2013) [-]
Okay? You can be an Atheist all you want, I wasn't arguing over the sake of religion, I was arguing over the sake of gods. The infinite alternate universe theory states that every possibility, no matter how far fetched or unpredictable or even mundane, MUST come true given enough time or opportunity. That means whether we like it or not, gods do exist in some universes and do not exist in others, whether they exist in this one or not is still up for debate
User avatar #80 - alltimetens (08/06/2013) [-]
But religion doesn't believe in a God who rules over one universe. Religions would most likely believe in a God who created the multiverse and rules beyond that.
User avatar #83 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
They do, but what they believe and what's true (and more statistically probable) are two separate things
User avatar #84 - alltimetens (08/07/2013) [-]
If the God doesn't rule over everything, then by definition, he is not a God. Assuming that the multiverse hasn't always existed, which would make more mathematical sense, a God by definition, is a being which is eternal, meaning it has always existed, then the God existed prior to the multiverse, which would only mean that the God rules over the multiverse.
User avatar #89 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
No, no that's not the definition of 'god', at all. God/Deity: A superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes (this mostly applies to other, non-Judaic religions. When talking about Judaic religions themselves, a god is simply a supreme being and has total authority). But the multiverse HAS always existed (and makes more sense mathematically as well, as Quantum-Physics and Thermodynamics explain how the two atoms that collided and formed this universe were actually two atoms from other universes that teleported through), this was explained in a documentary regarding it. If you imagine the multiverse as Swiss-Cheese, then all those little holes would be universes in themselves, constantly expanding, reducing, creating, or being destroyed and the cheese itself would be everything in between. The big bang just happened to be the creation of THIS specific universe, but others have existed long before it and will exist long afterwards. In any case, immortality does not correlate to ruler-ship. Just because you exist doesn't mean you create or destroy, it only means you are. All it MUST mean is that you're at least an observer, but not necessarily a participator or ruler
User avatar #92 - alltimetens (08/07/2013) [-]
Because a God existed before the Multiverse, and because a god has authority over each event and occurrence, than the Multiverse would have been a creation directly from a God or deity. An eternity to us is really nothing to an eternal being. I'll explain myself. What I said earlier was CRITERIA for a God. If you aren't eternal, all-knowing, and was never created, then you are not a God by definition.
User avatar #97 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
Except saying a god existed before the multiverse is a grandiose assumption that cannot be taken seriously. No, a god does not have authority over each event and occurrence, a god is just a master over a natural occurrence or human fortune (whether physical or spiritual); did you not read the definition?

But that's YOUR definition v.s. the universally accepted one, and I'm going with the universally accepted one, the one made by Oxford and Merriam-Webster. You do not have to be all-knowing, all-powerful, or eternal, you just have to have supremacy over a certain field. I.E. if you were a superhuman who controlled animals and foliage you could be called a 'god of nature', while another superhuman who had absolute mastery over his body, weapons, and battle-strategies could be called a 'god of war'
User avatar #99 - alltimetens (08/07/2013) [-]
Why would there be a "universal definition"? The term God is very subjective. If a God really did create the universe, the God would have an authority over every event.
User avatar #100 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
Because if you're going to debate about something, you have to determine exactly what you're debating about. Unless we agree on a definition, we may as well be arguing two completely different things. Every event in THAT universe, perhaps, but not the whole multiverse. Besides, that's assuming the god is all powerful, while we could simply say there are many gods that make up various skills and talents that relate to omnipotence.
User avatar #106 - alltimetens (08/07/2013) [-]
That's called polytheism, which is an outdated form of religion that only can be found in Hinduism in a large group of people. The Billions of Muslims, Christians, Catholics, etc. who believe in ONE deity can all agree on the fact that if there is a God, he definitely rules over the multiverse due to him being all-powerful. Remember, we're not talking about a petty one-universe god, we're talking about a deity with infinite power.
User avatar #129 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
Actually Polytheism was the dominant belief before the rise of Judaic religions which slaughtered practitioners of other beliefs. Besides, again, just because it's not popular does not mean it's not true. I don't believe in the "monotheistic all-powerful being" belief because it leaves too many loopholes.

I'm not talking about an all powerful deity because I do not believe there is one. My original argument was that there are gods in at least half of the infinite amount of universes and it's only unknown if we have none here.
User avatar #132 - alltimetens (08/07/2013) [-]
If there is a God who rules over the hyperverse, then whether or not there is a God in the universes does not change what exists outsie.
User avatar #136 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
But we don't know if there is and it's statistically improbable that that is true. If there IS some eternally cosmic being, he is just an observer, not anyone with tangible power. How do I know? I don't, and neither do you, but I dislike the idea of an ultimate authority because it takes responsibility and power away from myself, it means I have no control and when I have no control what's the point of living anyways? I will continue to believe there is no eternally cosmic being because that's what I like because I have no evidence to prove otherwise and neither do you

This is why we cannot debate, because it's not about evidence, it's not about facts, it's about opinions and neither of our opinions will change
User avatar #28 - eiaisqzbsesb (08/06/2013) [-]
And I was backing it up by further explaining it to those who thumbed you down.
User avatar #29 - captainfuckitall (08/06/2013) [-]
Ah, my mistake
User avatar #30 - eiaisqzbsesb (08/06/2013) [-]
It's ok, everyone makes mistakes.
#95 - Am I the only one who finds the massive beating heart *… 08/06/2013 on Video Game Trivia 11 +1
#5 - To be honest, I always hated Bloo. He was obnoxious, unappreci…  [+] (12 new replies) 08/06/2013 on How it feels when I go... +66
#48 - toddingram (08/07/2013) [-]
**toddingram rolled a random image posted in comment #194 at Dog got into the pot ** that's because he's a foil to max. in short bloo is more everything mac isn't and that's why he imagined him that way.
User avatar #51 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
I know that, but again, I can't understand WHY. I would hate to have a friend like Bloo, he just reminds me too much of that bratty kid-meme, you know the one, where the moment you start winning at playing a game he quits, or the one who always uses the best control whether at your place or his because he uses the "I'm a guest" or "You're just a guest" excuse
User avatar #37 - akkere (08/07/2013) [-]
I really hate characters that just undergo a complete personality change in a short time span in a series. Bloo was that kind of character.

He just went from this moderate jokester kind of guy in the pilot movie to this blatant obnoxious douche in the actual series.

Some episodes, it looked like even Mac was getting tired of his shit. When the guy who creates you from his mind is tired of your shit, and he worked really goddamn hard so that he could keep dealing with your shit, that's a problem.
User avatar #38 - captainfuckitall (08/07/2013) [-]
Exactly, and even in THOSE episodes when he curbed his behaviour, it was more about him just wanting to buy forgiveness so he could carry on with his actions, and less about him actually CARING about friends and those around him

It would have been okay if he was just a goof-ball or a bit brash in nature whenever things rubbed him the wrong way, but he always just seemed to be a little shit who made it bad for everyone else when he didn't get his way
#57 - 4chan refugee (08/08/2013) [-]
You can tell by the difference of voices, there's the calm voice- and then there's the series voice- whiny. In the calm voicing, he may get excited easily- but his intentions are good, and he's usually smiling. As whiny series voice, he's usually apathetic, or bitching.
User avatar #27 - garymotherfingoak (08/06/2013) [-]
He was cool in the series premire and first couple of episodes, then the writers made him into an asshole.
#13 - pokemonstheshiz (08/06/2013) [-]
But the point of Bloo was that he was everything Mac wasn't. That's why they were best friends, they kept each other happy and in check
User avatar #12 - lorddarkskull (08/06/2013) [-]
It's because mac was a timid sheltered kid who didn't know how to have fun, so he designed someone to be his opposite.
#20 - lelelexdddd has deleted their comment.
User avatar #7 - malhaloc (08/06/2013) [-]
I was really disappointed with the way they had him in the show. In the movie which actually was the pilot, he didn't strike me as a bad person. He was actually kinda funny. Sure he was a smartass sometimes but not a bad guy. Then the show came out and I'm like...why?
User avatar #6 - ZenMacros (08/06/2013) [-]
Fuck Bloo. Wilt was the man.
User avatar #10 - articulate (08/06/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, but Eduardo is best friend.
#8 - >Implying anyone would actually stop her or give a *… 08/06/2013 on Anna Kendrick -3
#8 - >Everyone on funnyjunk >Only 8 comments >Of t…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/05/2013 on Bootcamp... +19
#35 - doodogger (08/06/2013) [-]
Maybe there were less comments when you saw mine?
It was mostly a sarcastic joke. easy spanky.
#29 - That's not perfect though, that's just an ideal 08/04/2013 on Only in books. -2
#32 - My god, Zarcos. You can't just point out when someone is not white 08/04/2013 on something smart +5
#18 - That's what I love about Biowares games, nearly every single c…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/04/2013 on something smart +1
User avatar #19 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
I know what you mean. I actually care about the characters and their motivations. Sadly when I played Dragon Age 2 I was like "what is this bullshit". Varric was the only really well conceived character, and after the freedom of Dragon Age: Origins the restrictions felt too great.
#24 - varric (08/04/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#41 - satrenkotheone (08/04/2013) [-]
Can I get a Griffon?
User avatar #25 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
By the Maker. If it isn't Hunkster McStudly. Tell me a story, please.
#26 - varric (08/04/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Well well well... Have you heard a story when I met my only love Bianca
User avatar #28 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
*Scoot scoot* Tell us uncle Varric.
#33 - varric (08/04/2013) [-]
One day I was going to the Hanged Man to tell all my friends a story about my chest hair.
Then there was one little group of assassin's after me.
There I was. Alone against 500 men.
I beat 352 of them only with my fists and my good look.
But they had a mage whit them. Blood mage. I knew that he was going to kill me.
Then I found crossbow, beautiful crossbow. With her we won against rest 461 assassin's and 37 blood mages. And that is the story how I met Bianca.
And it's all true.
User avatar #34 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
Sounds about right
#16 - "Yes Alistair, I have, as a matter of fact, licked my sha… 08/04/2013 on something smart 0
#15 - He also loved paintings. Not for the paintings itself, but for…  [+] (10 new replies) 08/04/2013 on something smart 0
User avatar #17 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
I think that it tells something that Sten disregarded the painting itself as mere fluff, and looked at the skills and techniques that went into the making. He thinks of a great artist as great, not because of what he paints, but how he paints.
User avatar #18 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
That's what I love about Biowares games, nearly every single character, even minor ones, have their own quirks and personalities and likes and dislikes and ambitions and desires. It gives everything a much bigger sense of companionship and care, and makes for some absolutely amazing and insightful moments when you're faced with a character who makes you examine yourself and your own personality
User avatar #19 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
I know what you mean. I actually care about the characters and their motivations. Sadly when I played Dragon Age 2 I was like "what is this bullshit". Varric was the only really well conceived character, and after the freedom of Dragon Age: Origins the restrictions felt too great.
#24 - varric (08/04/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#41 - satrenkotheone (08/04/2013) [-]
Can I get a Griffon?
User avatar #25 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
By the Maker. If it isn't Hunkster McStudly. Tell me a story, please.
#26 - varric (08/04/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Well well well... Have you heard a story when I met my only love Bianca
User avatar #28 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
*Scoot scoot* Tell us uncle Varric.
#33 - varric (08/04/2013) [-]
One day I was going to the Hanged Man to tell all my friends a story about my chest hair.
Then there was one little group of assassin's after me.
There I was. Alone against 500 men.
I beat 352 of them only with my fists and my good look.
But they had a mage whit them. Blood mage. I knew that he was going to kill me.
Then I found crossbow, beautiful crossbow. With her we won against rest 461 assassin's and 37 blood mages. And that is the story how I met Bianca.
And it's all true.
User avatar #34 - rikter (08/04/2013) [-]
Sounds about right
#3 - Why the hell would you want a perfect partner? I woul…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/04/2013 on Only in books. +12
User avatar #28 - chrisruler (08/04/2013) [-]
but what if your perfect partner IS someone you can experiment with??
User avatar #29 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
That's not perfect though, that's just an ideal
#214 - That's true, I never thought of it in such a way. Although I s…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #216 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Doing what is best for yourself is what's best for the whole, if everyone was thriving in life the issues we face today would just melt away, five years from now they'd be a distant memory.
#211 - Ah, humanity thrives on unity, but man thrives on individualit…  [+] (4 new replies) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #212 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Of course everyone is special in their own way but even an individual can shine most when he's got people he synergises with well. If you've got a loving wife you'll be a lot more likely to really flower as a person. It goes without saying that it's good to be a capable individual but it's when two capable individuals with wavelengths that compliment each other meet that they both really can come into their own league.
User avatar #213 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
So I think I'd have to disagree, man thrives in unity, but it has to be healthy unity not forced.
User avatar #214 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
That's true, I never thought of it in such a way. Although I suppose it goes back to that old quote "When we shine, we give others permission to do the same" (which also happens to be content here on funnyjunk at the moment). So can we agree that man thrives best when he is doing what is best for himself as WELL as the whole?
User avatar #216 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Doing what is best for yourself is what's best for the whole, if everyone was thriving in life the issues we face today would just melt away, five years from now they'd be a distant memory.
#207 - My absolute pleasure. Sorry for coming on rather strong, I did…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #209 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Nah, healthy debate. It's always good to share what you know. you often end up learning more.
#206 - Indeed it is, but that's also why we're human, isn't it? We're…  [+] (6 new replies) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #208 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Well yeah but life thrives in unity, not individuality.
A great painter can make a thousand masterpieces, two great painters working in unison can make ten thousand. That's the idea anyway.
User avatar #211 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
Ah, humanity thrives on unity, but man thrives on individuality. That's why we spend our entire teenage years figuring out who we are and what makes us special, and the rest of our lives being content in being a small cog that serves a bigger machine, because we KNOW we are special, and what makes us special is our job as the cog (so to speak)
User avatar #212 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Of course everyone is special in their own way but even an individual can shine most when he's got people he synergises with well. If you've got a loving wife you'll be a lot more likely to really flower as a person. It goes without saying that it's good to be a capable individual but it's when two capable individuals with wavelengths that compliment each other meet that they both really can come into their own league.
User avatar #213 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
So I think I'd have to disagree, man thrives in unity, but it has to be healthy unity not forced.
User avatar #214 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
That's true, I never thought of it in such a way. Although I suppose it goes back to that old quote "When we shine, we give others permission to do the same" (which also happens to be content here on funnyjunk at the moment). So can we agree that man thrives best when he is doing what is best for himself as WELL as the whole?
User avatar #216 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Doing what is best for yourself is what's best for the whole, if everyone was thriving in life the issues we face today would just melt away, five years from now they'd be a distant memory.
#204 - Actually, it's rather against that. As explained before, all S…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #205 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
I guess I read about a different sect then, thanks for the info.
User avatar #207 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
My absolute pleasure. Sorry for coming on rather strong, I didn't mean to insult you or tarry you off if I did
User avatar #209 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Nah, healthy debate. It's always good to share what you know. you often end up learning more.
#200 - I included Atheism in there as well for that same reason. It l…  [+] (9 new replies) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #202 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
I suppose.
Though in the case of countering the order of life, the lucifer experiment has been known to be attempted I think 3 times in the history of the universe and it always ended badly. I wouldn't suggest it.
User avatar #203 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
That's mostly why lucifer is shown in such a bad light, it's a warning.
User avatar #206 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
Indeed it is, but that's also why we're human, isn't it? We're not human because we became human, we're human because we earned it, because we fought against fate and every circumstance and every statistical improbability no matter how bleak things seemed. Because our own force of will carries us farther than any advantage our species has physically or mentally, and it is only human nature to reach for the stars even if others get burned for it or we get burned for it, simply because if we didn't...we would never know

That's why "Satanism" is a religion of the man rather than the god, because we ARE gods and just have to earn it (the basic message of Satanism)
User avatar #208 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Well yeah but life thrives in unity, not individuality.
A great painter can make a thousand masterpieces, two great painters working in unison can make ten thousand. That's the idea anyway.
User avatar #211 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
Ah, humanity thrives on unity, but man thrives on individuality. That's why we spend our entire teenage years figuring out who we are and what makes us special, and the rest of our lives being content in being a small cog that serves a bigger machine, because we KNOW we are special, and what makes us special is our job as the cog (so to speak)
User avatar #212 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Of course everyone is special in their own way but even an individual can shine most when he's got people he synergises with well. If you've got a loving wife you'll be a lot more likely to really flower as a person. It goes without saying that it's good to be a capable individual but it's when two capable individuals with wavelengths that compliment each other meet that they both really can come into their own league.
User avatar #213 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
So I think I'd have to disagree, man thrives in unity, but it has to be healthy unity not forced.
User avatar #214 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
That's true, I never thought of it in such a way. Although I suppose it goes back to that old quote "When we shine, we give others permission to do the same" (which also happens to be content here on funnyjunk at the moment). So can we agree that man thrives best when he is doing what is best for himself as WELL as the whole?
User avatar #216 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Doing what is best for yourself is what's best for the whole, if everyone was thriving in life the issues we face today would just melt away, five years from now they'd be a distant memory.
#196 - >Christians just took common sense/courtesy and slapped god…  [+] (18 new replies) 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
User avatar #201 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
also common sense/courtesy does not involve 200 year long wars based on imaginary friends
User avatar #197 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Most of them involve some sort of spiritual belief in a god or deities.

My point is it has no satanic worship nothing that you wouldn't do were you completely absent religious belief which is kind of the point of having a religion you believe in.
User avatar #200 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
I included Atheism in there as well for that same reason. It literally can be used as an argument against just about any type of thought process or philosophy

And LaVeyan Satanism doesn't, but Spiritual Satanists and Theistic Satanists both consider Satan a real being, and worship him as such (I've left many comments below describing this relationship, feel free to check on them if you wish). But you're right, LaVeyan Satanists are not concerned with Satan as they only use him as a metaphor, however, they reason they added the name to their belief was because Satan is the greatest 'opposer' in literary history if not history in general, and they wanted to personify that same belief of conflict, strength, independence, and justice into a philosophical system (which is why many Satanists and people who've research it actually argue that Satanism is NOT a religion, but a philosophy). And to even JOIN LaVeyan Satanism you had to 'oppose' usual religious thinking and stereotypes in your area. THAT'S why they added the name of Satan to it, not because they wanted to stroke their ego's
User avatar #202 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
I suppose.
Though in the case of countering the order of life, the lucifer experiment has been known to be attempted I think 3 times in the history of the universe and it always ended badly. I wouldn't suggest it.
User avatar #203 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
That's mostly why lucifer is shown in such a bad light, it's a warning.
User avatar #206 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
Indeed it is, but that's also why we're human, isn't it? We're not human because we became human, we're human because we earned it, because we fought against fate and every circumstance and every statistical improbability no matter how bleak things seemed. Because our own force of will carries us farther than any advantage our species has physically or mentally, and it is only human nature to reach for the stars even if others get burned for it or we get burned for it, simply because if we didn't...we would never know

That's why "Satanism" is a religion of the man rather than the god, because we ARE gods and just have to earn it (the basic message of Satanism)
User avatar #208 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Well yeah but life thrives in unity, not individuality.
A great painter can make a thousand masterpieces, two great painters working in unison can make ten thousand. That's the idea anyway.
User avatar #211 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
Ah, humanity thrives on unity, but man thrives on individuality. That's why we spend our entire teenage years figuring out who we are and what makes us special, and the rest of our lives being content in being a small cog that serves a bigger machine, because we KNOW we are special, and what makes us special is our job as the cog (so to speak)
User avatar #212 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Of course everyone is special in their own way but even an individual can shine most when he's got people he synergises with well. If you've got a loving wife you'll be a lot more likely to really flower as a person. It goes without saying that it's good to be a capable individual but it's when two capable individuals with wavelengths that compliment each other meet that they both really can come into their own league.
User avatar #213 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
So I think I'd have to disagree, man thrives in unity, but it has to be healthy unity not forced.
User avatar #214 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
That's true, I never thought of it in such a way. Although I suppose it goes back to that old quote "When we shine, we give others permission to do the same" (which also happens to be content here on funnyjunk at the moment). So can we agree that man thrives best when he is doing what is best for himself as WELL as the whole?
User avatar #216 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Doing what is best for yourself is what's best for the whole, if everyone was thriving in life the issues we face today would just melt away, five years from now they'd be a distant memory.
User avatar #198 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Basically their "belief" is to do whatever you want. How then is that any different from just existing. Don't you already do what you want as it is, it's like taking the consumption of food, slapping a mythical creature onto it and saying "if you eat food you're part of this religion" it doesn't alter anything therefore the mythical creature has no reason to exist.
User avatar #204 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
Actually, it's rather against that. As explained before, all Satanic sects (not counting Devil Worshipers or Pseudo-Satanists as they are ostracized by the rest of the community that is in the majority) have the main goal of becoming your own god, this involves an actual LACK of doing whatever you want, as you are supposed to intentionally go and throw yourself into struggles and conflict, then reward yourself as you see fit (struggles and conflict meaning just about anything that's a challenge to do, whether through exercise, or acing a test, or having an actual battle, or doing things you're scared of doing). The old quote "Man cannot remake himself without suffering, for he is both the sculptor and the clay" perfectly describes Satanism in itself, as on your journey to god-hood, you will need to have the same wisdom, experience, and judgment that being a god comes with, all of which come from personal struggles and suffering

You may not see it as anything more than a pitiful expression of self, but those followers do take it quite seriously and believe it makes them better people. If I were you, I would value that in itself more than WHY they chose to be better people (after-all, there is no difference between becoming better due to a philosophy and working harder because of seeing a motivational picture, of which we all have done)
User avatar #205 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
I guess I read about a different sect then, thanks for the info.
User avatar #207 - captainfuckitall (08/04/2013) [-]
My absolute pleasure. Sorry for coming on rather strong, I didn't mean to insult you or tarry you off if I did
User avatar #209 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Nah, healthy debate. It's always good to share what you know. you often end up learning more.
User avatar #199 - derpomancy (08/04/2013) [-]
Other than boredom and/or trying to mask something as being more than it actually is which is just stupid.
#195 - This is why many Satanists (and those who have researched it) … 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
#194 - It actually stands for the Satanist. The main goal of Satanism… 08/04/2013 on Satanists 0
#340 - I find it funny that you say they have no merit when you only … 08/04/2013 on (1881) 0
#338 - *Won, sorry. I'm quite tired 08/04/2013 on (1881) 0
#337 - How convenient that you use my attitude at YOUR unwillingness …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/04/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #339 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
I never said I was too good to answer. I tried. But you're too thick to accept that your statements have no merit.
#335 - I already said below, if you would have bothered to read the c…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/04/2013 on (1881) 0
User avatar #336 - YllekNayr (08/04/2013) [-]
There is no upper hand with you, and this seems like one long exercise in futility. I'm willing to have this kind of conversation with most anyone, but not indefinitely, and since it seems like this is going nowhere and you seem to fail to recognize your inherent bias against atheists being.....well......atheists......I'm withdrawing from this conversation.

Comments(481):

[ 481 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - 4chan refugee (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - 4chan refugee (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
[ 481 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)