Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

captainfuckitall    

Rank #668 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 342 Comments: Sold Soul
Offline
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#668
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  90 ,  50
Comment Thumbs: 44413 total,  55021 ,  10608
Content Level Progress: 76.27% (45/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 88.5% (885/1000)
Level 342 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 343 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:20
Content Views:9655
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14198
FJ Points:15116

latest user's comments

#32 - I like how you pointed out how you were skipping over it and t…  [+] (11 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… +1
User avatar #40 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
oh, and one final thing. Since i just can't stay away from fucktards.

Your arrogant ignorance is astoundingly infuriating. The problem with society is that it functions as a democracy, which is a flawed system.

Remember the divide you mentioned? I don't understand why you talk about it in a bad light. See, if i met you in real life, i'd probably hate you with a passion. Why in the fuck would i ever want to be anywhere near someone as arrogant, hypocritical, stupid and ignorant as yourself, let alone actually speak with you?

The problem with the democratic society is that loudmouth degenerates like you hold the majority vote. Anyone who does not adhere to your frankly idiotic vision of how people should act is labeled deffective or antisocial.
Have you ever stopped for a fucking minute to think that, "Hey, maybe they're not antisocial. Maybe they just don't want to talk with US because we have absolutely fuck all in common." Seriously. What the fuck do you think is going to happen? What, are you going to talk about a sports match with them? Are you high? Maybe they are absolutely uninterested in your stupid mundane life, and couldn't give less of a fuck about what you have to say?
"Nope, they don't want to talk about the inane shit i'm into they must be antisocial"

And not only that. You go as far as to actually villify them. VIllify! What the shit is actually wrong with you?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
User avatar #43 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Hush now, i know you're too stupid to forumulate any semblance of an actual valid argument. We shall speak of this no longer.

INB4 "Okay."
User avatar #45 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#47 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#49 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#51 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Ok.
User avatar #35 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
By skipping over it, i meant i'd rather not go particularly in depth, but felt to point it out because i like pointing out stupidly obvious things.

Immortality?
I hope you mean immorality, otherwise i am incapable of divining the meaning behind you perplexing statement.
And if you did mean immorality then that just raises further question along the line of: Wouldn't anyone who falls under your frankly adorable list of ideals be "very quick to inform you of the immortality of it all"? I'd expect you to be the first to advocate against such atrocities.
The fact that you believe yourself without argument says much about your ability to comprehend the written word, so i am going to drop the facade of a well-spoken person because i'm starting to feel a wrench in my gut from all the passive aggressive pretentiousness.

You are a complete and utter fucking joke. You devalue a "culture" as you so delicately put it, simply because it doesn't coincide with your utterly fucking moronic belief on what should be "glorified"
Your obsession with this word is revolting, and your hypocrisy is nauseating.
So here are some arguments you illiterate twit:
1) Your deffinition of morality can go fuck itself. It's entirely subjective, and you don't get to tell people what the fuck they can and can not do.
2) Your absolutely daft idea that hobbies should stay personal is.. shockingly absolutely fucking retarded because people like to be around other people who share the same interests. It does not create any friction or frustration, not for them. They are having the time of their fucking lives there. For you, maybe. But no one really gives a shit what you think. And it divides? So what? If we removed everything that devided people and just stuck to things everyone can enjoy we'd be stuck in a bland homogenized gray piece of shit planet.
For your sake i hope you are trolling, because if not you are not only dangerously stupid, but disgustingly malignant.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#27 - It's broad because it's been glorified and turned into a cultu…  [+] (13 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… +1
User avatar #30 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Skipping over your first absolutely absurd sentence. I really don't understand what you have against cultures forming, humans of similar interests and goals have been flocking together since the beginning
Well, first off the notion of "good" and indeed our perception of morality itself is entirely subjective and merely a product of the times we live in. As the ages pass, so do the beliefs on which we base our entire perception of reality. But let's set aside my slightly nihilistic outlook on life and focus on your disney-esque vision of virtue.
Do you believe that someone who has interest in or is a part of nerd culture is incapable of possesing these ideals which you so proudly extol?
The notion that they are not only incapable of such moral values (Something which you are not only insinuating, but downright propagating) , but are in fact possibly the exact opposite is both perplexing and contradictory as it is discriminatory, which does coincide with the ideal of righteousness.. at least not my understanding of it.
I am unable to comprehend your particular brand of insanity as it reeks of hypocrisy and close-minded ignorance.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I like how you pointed out how you were skipping over it and then...didn't. In any case, I have nothing against cultures forming, what I'm against is some guy thinking he's a fundamentally better person for liking one rock while some other dick likes sand. "Non-nerds don't apologize for being assholes", because THAT'S what it does. It divides and creates unnecessary friction and frustration.

Not we're getting into splitting hairs because you can't be bothered to make a single defining statement. Granted I'm sure if I brought up things like slavery or child killing you'd be very quick to inform me of the immortality of it all.

>I continue to grasp at straws to prove myself right when I am utterly without argument. So instead of making one I will completely remove the conversation from the original topic and insult you

I hope to have your level of debating skills one day.
User avatar #40 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
oh, and one final thing. Since i just can't stay away from fucktards.

Your arrogant ignorance is astoundingly infuriating. The problem with society is that it functions as a democracy, which is a flawed system.

Remember the divide you mentioned? I don't understand why you talk about it in a bad light. See, if i met you in real life, i'd probably hate you with a passion. Why in the fuck would i ever want to be anywhere near someone as arrogant, hypocritical, stupid and ignorant as yourself, let alone actually speak with you?

The problem with the democratic society is that loudmouth degenerates like you hold the majority vote. Anyone who does not adhere to your frankly idiotic vision of how people should act is labeled deffective or antisocial.
Have you ever stopped for a fucking minute to think that, "Hey, maybe they're not antisocial. Maybe they just don't want to talk with US because we have absolutely fuck all in common." Seriously. What the fuck do you think is going to happen? What, are you going to talk about a sports match with them? Are you high? Maybe they are absolutely uninterested in your stupid mundane life, and couldn't give less of a fuck about what you have to say?
"Nope, they don't want to talk about the inane shit i'm into they must be antisocial"

And not only that. You go as far as to actually villify them. VIllify! What the shit is actually wrong with you?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
User avatar #43 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Hush now, i know you're too stupid to forumulate any semblance of an actual valid argument. We shall speak of this no longer.

INB4 "Okay."
User avatar #45 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#47 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#49 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#51 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Ok.
User avatar #35 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
By skipping over it, i meant i'd rather not go particularly in depth, but felt to point it out because i like pointing out stupidly obvious things.

Immortality?
I hope you mean immorality, otherwise i am incapable of divining the meaning behind you perplexing statement.
And if you did mean immorality then that just raises further question along the line of: Wouldn't anyone who falls under your frankly adorable list of ideals be "very quick to inform you of the immortality of it all"? I'd expect you to be the first to advocate against such atrocities.
The fact that you believe yourself without argument says much about your ability to comprehend the written word, so i am going to drop the facade of a well-spoken person because i'm starting to feel a wrench in my gut from all the passive aggressive pretentiousness.

You are a complete and utter fucking joke. You devalue a "culture" as you so delicately put it, simply because it doesn't coincide with your utterly fucking moronic belief on what should be "glorified"
Your obsession with this word is revolting, and your hypocrisy is nauseating.
So here are some arguments you illiterate twit:
1) Your deffinition of morality can go fuck itself. It's entirely subjective, and you don't get to tell people what the fuck they can and can not do.
2) Your absolutely daft idea that hobbies should stay personal is.. shockingly absolutely fucking retarded because people like to be around other people who share the same interests. It does not create any friction or frustration, not for them. They are having the time of their fucking lives there. For you, maybe. But no one really gives a shit what you think. And it divides? So what? If we removed everything that devided people and just stuck to things everyone can enjoy we'd be stuck in a bland homogenized gray piece of shit planet.
For your sake i hope you are trolling, because if not you are not only dangerously stupid, but disgustingly malignant.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#24 - Because it's a hobby. Just a hobby. Just something that people…  [+] (15 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… -1
User avatar #26 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
A hobby.
Collecting stamps is a hobby. Building model ships, playing soccer, fishing..
Being a nerd or a geek? I don't really think that you can really classify that as a hobby, because it's too borad of a deffinition as it covers a very large spectrum of interests.

And, yes. i really do need a list, because i honestly have no idea what these ideals you believe should be glorified are.
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
It's broad because it's been glorified and turned into a culture. It used to be just enjoying or having a passion for something outlandish.

...You can't be fucking serious right now

Ideals of bravery, determination, righteousness, good nature...

You need a list? An actual list to point out what ideals are good and should be viewed as good?

Holy fuck man, you really are something else, aren't you?
User avatar #30 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Skipping over your first absolutely absurd sentence. I really don't understand what you have against cultures forming, humans of similar interests and goals have been flocking together since the beginning
Well, first off the notion of "good" and indeed our perception of morality itself is entirely subjective and merely a product of the times we live in. As the ages pass, so do the beliefs on which we base our entire perception of reality. But let's set aside my slightly nihilistic outlook on life and focus on your disney-esque vision of virtue.
Do you believe that someone who has interest in or is a part of nerd culture is incapable of possesing these ideals which you so proudly extol?
The notion that they are not only incapable of such moral values (Something which you are not only insinuating, but downright propagating) , but are in fact possibly the exact opposite is both perplexing and contradictory as it is discriminatory, which does coincide with the ideal of righteousness.. at least not my understanding of it.
I am unable to comprehend your particular brand of insanity as it reeks of hypocrisy and close-minded ignorance.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I like how you pointed out how you were skipping over it and then...didn't. In any case, I have nothing against cultures forming, what I'm against is some guy thinking he's a fundamentally better person for liking one rock while some other dick likes sand. "Non-nerds don't apologize for being assholes", because THAT'S what it does. It divides and creates unnecessary friction and frustration.

Not we're getting into splitting hairs because you can't be bothered to make a single defining statement. Granted I'm sure if I brought up things like slavery or child killing you'd be very quick to inform me of the immortality of it all.

>I continue to grasp at straws to prove myself right when I am utterly without argument. So instead of making one I will completely remove the conversation from the original topic and insult you

I hope to have your level of debating skills one day.
User avatar #40 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
oh, and one final thing. Since i just can't stay away from fucktards.

Your arrogant ignorance is astoundingly infuriating. The problem with society is that it functions as a democracy, which is a flawed system.

Remember the divide you mentioned? I don't understand why you talk about it in a bad light. See, if i met you in real life, i'd probably hate you with a passion. Why in the fuck would i ever want to be anywhere near someone as arrogant, hypocritical, stupid and ignorant as yourself, let alone actually speak with you?

The problem with the democratic society is that loudmouth degenerates like you hold the majority vote. Anyone who does not adhere to your frankly idiotic vision of how people should act is labeled deffective or antisocial.
Have you ever stopped for a fucking minute to think that, "Hey, maybe they're not antisocial. Maybe they just don't want to talk with US because we have absolutely fuck all in common." Seriously. What the fuck do you think is going to happen? What, are you going to talk about a sports match with them? Are you high? Maybe they are absolutely uninterested in your stupid mundane life, and couldn't give less of a fuck about what you have to say?
"Nope, they don't want to talk about the inane shit i'm into they must be antisocial"

And not only that. You go as far as to actually villify them. VIllify! What the shit is actually wrong with you?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
User avatar #43 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Hush now, i know you're too stupid to forumulate any semblance of an actual valid argument. We shall speak of this no longer.

INB4 "Okay."
User avatar #45 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#47 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#49 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#51 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Ok.
User avatar #35 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
By skipping over it, i meant i'd rather not go particularly in depth, but felt to point it out because i like pointing out stupidly obvious things.

Immortality?
I hope you mean immorality, otherwise i am incapable of divining the meaning behind you perplexing statement.
And if you did mean immorality then that just raises further question along the line of: Wouldn't anyone who falls under your frankly adorable list of ideals be "very quick to inform you of the immortality of it all"? I'd expect you to be the first to advocate against such atrocities.
The fact that you believe yourself without argument says much about your ability to comprehend the written word, so i am going to drop the facade of a well-spoken person because i'm starting to feel a wrench in my gut from all the passive aggressive pretentiousness.

You are a complete and utter fucking joke. You devalue a "culture" as you so delicately put it, simply because it doesn't coincide with your utterly fucking moronic belief on what should be "glorified"
Your obsession with this word is revolting, and your hypocrisy is nauseating.
So here are some arguments you illiterate twit:
1) Your deffinition of morality can go fuck itself. It's entirely subjective, and you don't get to tell people what the fuck they can and can not do.
2) Your absolutely daft idea that hobbies should stay personal is.. shockingly absolutely fucking retarded because people like to be around other people who share the same interests. It does not create any friction or frustration, not for them. They are having the time of their fucking lives there. For you, maybe. But no one really gives a shit what you think. And it divides? So what? If we removed everything that devided people and just stuck to things everyone can enjoy we'd be stuck in a bland homogenized gray piece of shit planet.
For your sake i hope you are trolling, because if not you are not only dangerously stupid, but disgustingly malignant.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#22 - I know, I was comparing the two, as they are similar in develo… 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… 0
#21 - It's not that, it's just that people are glorifying things tha…  [+] (17 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… 0
User avatar #23 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
According to whom? I'd very much like to see this list of things that should and should not be glorified.
User avatar #24 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Because it's a hobby. Just a hobby. Just something that people do in their spare time. They can enjoy it, but it doesn't make them a 'better person' for doing it any more than that one asshole who collects sand from different beaches, or stamps from around the world.

Do you really NEED a list?

Certain behaviours should be glorified, just like certain aspects, ideals, and traits should be glorified, even actions and events can be glorified, but a hobby is just a hobby and something personal that you do. That's it. It's good for you and doesn't have to be for anyone else but you, and by involving other people, ideals, or notions, you turn what was once a simple hobby into a massive culture with stereotypes, standards, and ranking systems.

Why the fuck would you EVER want that?
User avatar #26 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
A hobby.
Collecting stamps is a hobby. Building model ships, playing soccer, fishing..
Being a nerd or a geek? I don't really think that you can really classify that as a hobby, because it's too borad of a deffinition as it covers a very large spectrum of interests.

And, yes. i really do need a list, because i honestly have no idea what these ideals you believe should be glorified are.
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
It's broad because it's been glorified and turned into a culture. It used to be just enjoying or having a passion for something outlandish.

...You can't be fucking serious right now

Ideals of bravery, determination, righteousness, good nature...

You need a list? An actual list to point out what ideals are good and should be viewed as good?

Holy fuck man, you really are something else, aren't you?
User avatar #30 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Skipping over your first absolutely absurd sentence. I really don't understand what you have against cultures forming, humans of similar interests and goals have been flocking together since the beginning
Well, first off the notion of "good" and indeed our perception of morality itself is entirely subjective and merely a product of the times we live in. As the ages pass, so do the beliefs on which we base our entire perception of reality. But let's set aside my slightly nihilistic outlook on life and focus on your disney-esque vision of virtue.
Do you believe that someone who has interest in or is a part of nerd culture is incapable of possesing these ideals which you so proudly extol?
The notion that they are not only incapable of such moral values (Something which you are not only insinuating, but downright propagating) , but are in fact possibly the exact opposite is both perplexing and contradictory as it is discriminatory, which does coincide with the ideal of righteousness.. at least not my understanding of it.
I am unable to comprehend your particular brand of insanity as it reeks of hypocrisy and close-minded ignorance.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I like how you pointed out how you were skipping over it and then...didn't. In any case, I have nothing against cultures forming, what I'm against is some guy thinking he's a fundamentally better person for liking one rock while some other dick likes sand. "Non-nerds don't apologize for being assholes", because THAT'S what it does. It divides and creates unnecessary friction and frustration.

Not we're getting into splitting hairs because you can't be bothered to make a single defining statement. Granted I'm sure if I brought up things like slavery or child killing you'd be very quick to inform me of the immortality of it all.

>I continue to grasp at straws to prove myself right when I am utterly without argument. So instead of making one I will completely remove the conversation from the original topic and insult you

I hope to have your level of debating skills one day.
User avatar #40 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
oh, and one final thing. Since i just can't stay away from fucktards.

Your arrogant ignorance is astoundingly infuriating. The problem with society is that it functions as a democracy, which is a flawed system.

Remember the divide you mentioned? I don't understand why you talk about it in a bad light. See, if i met you in real life, i'd probably hate you with a passion. Why in the fuck would i ever want to be anywhere near someone as arrogant, hypocritical, stupid and ignorant as yourself, let alone actually speak with you?

The problem with the democratic society is that loudmouth degenerates like you hold the majority vote. Anyone who does not adhere to your frankly idiotic vision of how people should act is labeled deffective or antisocial.
Have you ever stopped for a fucking minute to think that, "Hey, maybe they're not antisocial. Maybe they just don't want to talk with US because we have absolutely fuck all in common." Seriously. What the fuck do you think is going to happen? What, are you going to talk about a sports match with them? Are you high? Maybe they are absolutely uninterested in your stupid mundane life, and couldn't give less of a fuck about what you have to say?
"Nope, they don't want to talk about the inane shit i'm into they must be antisocial"

And not only that. You go as far as to actually villify them. VIllify! What the shit is actually wrong with you?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
User avatar #43 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Hush now, i know you're too stupid to forumulate any semblance of an actual valid argument. We shall speak of this no longer.

INB4 "Okay."
User avatar #45 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#47 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#49 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#51 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Ok.
User avatar #35 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
By skipping over it, i meant i'd rather not go particularly in depth, but felt to point it out because i like pointing out stupidly obvious things.

Immortality?
I hope you mean immorality, otherwise i am incapable of divining the meaning behind you perplexing statement.
And if you did mean immorality then that just raises further question along the line of: Wouldn't anyone who falls under your frankly adorable list of ideals be "very quick to inform you of the immortality of it all"? I'd expect you to be the first to advocate against such atrocities.
The fact that you believe yourself without argument says much about your ability to comprehend the written word, so i am going to drop the facade of a well-spoken person because i'm starting to feel a wrench in my gut from all the passive aggressive pretentiousness.

You are a complete and utter fucking joke. You devalue a "culture" as you so delicately put it, simply because it doesn't coincide with your utterly fucking moronic belief on what should be "glorified"
Your obsession with this word is revolting, and your hypocrisy is nauseating.
So here are some arguments you illiterate twit:
1) Your deffinition of morality can go fuck itself. It's entirely subjective, and you don't get to tell people what the fuck they can and can not do.
2) Your absolutely daft idea that hobbies should stay personal is.. shockingly absolutely fucking retarded because people like to be around other people who share the same interests. It does not create any friction or frustration, not for them. They are having the time of their fucking lives there. For you, maybe. But no one really gives a shit what you think. And it divides? So what? If we removed everything that devided people and just stuck to things everyone can enjoy we'd be stuck in a bland homogenized gray piece of shit planet.
For your sake i hope you are trolling, because if not you are not only dangerously stupid, but disgustingly malignant.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#92 - >Not understanding jokes  [+] (1 new reply) 05/08/2014 on and then there is us -1
User avatar #122 - popnotes (05/08/2014) [-]
>Making shitty jokes
#15 - Well no, Introverted is being able to thrive in isolation. Not… 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… 0
#13 - I'm sorry sir, I don't mean to upset you, nor is it bait. …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… 0
#14 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
I maybe see your point, but if you can't even go outside without vomiting you sure as hell are an introvert
User avatar #15 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Well no, Introverted is being able to thrive in isolation. Not being able to go outside without vomiting is social autism. Two completely different things.
#13 - We all know it's you, drugsexplain. In any case, you …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Emo vs. Goth +1
#59 - drugsexplain (05/10/2014) [-]
that last one wasn't me, but fuck you anyway.
I hadn't slept in 48 hours at the time of this post so I was a bit of.

I only have such disdain for emos because they: whine without working to fix their issues, they wallow in self pity, they tend to be attention whores.

but most of all they often say they are goth when they are not.
User avatar #60 - captainfuckitall (05/10/2014) [-]
And you're not an attention whore? Fuck off.
#10 - "Suddenly become cool", I fail to see where I talked…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/08/2014 on Do not apologize… +2
#12 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
<pic related
#17 - I just got the definition from Google. Because Fascis… 05/08/2014 on Das Proofreader 0
#4 - Isn't spock supposed to be sorta...emotionless?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/08/2014 on pressin the wrong vending... 0
#6 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
latest movie he loses his shit when khan kills kirk in a reversal of how it happened in the original wrath of khan
#43 - You know, this is completely off topic, but I've always hated …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/07/2014 on Just my opinion -1
#45 - codyxvasco (05/08/2014) [-]
Finally someone gets it!

I too am tired of this bullshit!
#8 - And here you are on an image site defending the practice of be…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/07/2014 on Emo vs. Goth 0
#11 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
Fuck you.

You don't have to be an asshole for no reason.
User avatar #13 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
We all know it's you, drugsexplain.

In any case, you don't have to be a ponce for no reason. When you put an opinion out there, you open yourself to criticism, that's the magic of free speech. People don't believe or care for your bullshit, so they insult you, that's how it works.
#59 - drugsexplain (05/10/2014) [-]
that last one wasn't me, but fuck you anyway.
I hadn't slept in 48 hours at the time of this post so I was a bit of.

I only have such disdain for emos because they: whine without working to fix their issues, they wallow in self pity, they tend to be attention whores.

but most of all they often say they are goth when they are not.
User avatar #60 - captainfuckitall (05/10/2014) [-]
And you're not an attention whore? Fuck off.
#5 - I really hate how the whole "nerd/geek" culture sudd…  [+] (38 new replies) 05/07/2014 on Do not apologize… -12
#36 - djhuehue (05/08/2014) [-]
People who always tell everyone how introverted they are are like people with gluten allergies.
User avatar #31 - yunoknow (05/08/2014) [-]
Being a geek is simply being very passionate about a certain thing. I personally think it's a good thing the public is starting to appreciate geek culture, we're allowed to talk about our hobbies and interests to most people without being judged as much now.
But like all traits it's best to be taken in moderation. Passionate is one thing, obsessive is another.
User avatar #33 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I know it is, which I dislike that it's formed into a massive culture with rifts and divides because people so desperately want to seem cool.

Originally, it was just a hobby, an interest you could have and share with others if you were so inclined, much like stamp or sand collecting. But when you involve a certain ego to it, that collecting this type of sand makes you better than that asshole who collects that type of sand, you create unnecessary problems within your own beloved group.

See, originally I could get some guys together and have a smashing game of D&D, but now I can't walk into a single game shop and suggest it without an entire debate going in uproar about which version is better, which things are broken, which GAMES are better, which settings are more important, what the characters should be like, so on, so fourth until the entire place is divided into a dozen separate groups because they refuse to look at eachother as "Guys who enjoy what I do" and instead only see them as "Wrong for not liking it in the EXACT way I do". That's what happens when you make something into a culture, and that's why I do not like the glorification of something that does not need to be glorified.
User avatar #34 - yunoknow (05/08/2014) [-]
I guess it's one of the downsides that comes with public validation. There are just more people involved now and with the new wave of players, more vocal, hardcore fans that try to dominate fandoms. And I'm sure rifts and divisions have always been in geek culture, especially since the nature of being a geek is to have very strong feelings for said subject matter. Maybe it'll fade away like most fads soon, who knows?
User avatar #20 - hellomynameisbill (05/08/2014) [-]
being a nerd/geek and antisocial are two very different things.

a nerd/geek is a person who obsesses over a field of media/technology etc. to the point in which they would bother or bore others. hence speaking to less people.

an antisocial outcast or introvert is a person who is unpopular and/or have a strange personality and thus doesn't like to speak to others at all.

the reason that you've received red thumbs is because you have basically insulted worryingly obsessive pop culture fanatics everywhere by calling them "a socially awkward piece of shit who never leaves their house"
User avatar #22 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I know, I was comparing the two, as they are similar in development to 'popular' status.

I know why I'm receiving red thumbs, but it really doesn't bother me. Perhaps my wording could have been better, though...
User avatar #17 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Yeah it's almost like the world is in a constant state of change or something. Go figure.
User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's just that people are glorifying things that have no reason to be glorified.
User avatar #23 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
According to whom? I'd very much like to see this list of things that should and should not be glorified.
User avatar #24 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Because it's a hobby. Just a hobby. Just something that people do in their spare time. They can enjoy it, but it doesn't make them a 'better person' for doing it any more than that one asshole who collects sand from different beaches, or stamps from around the world.

Do you really NEED a list?

Certain behaviours should be glorified, just like certain aspects, ideals, and traits should be glorified, even actions and events can be glorified, but a hobby is just a hobby and something personal that you do. That's it. It's good for you and doesn't have to be for anyone else but you, and by involving other people, ideals, or notions, you turn what was once a simple hobby into a massive culture with stereotypes, standards, and ranking systems.

Why the fuck would you EVER want that?
User avatar #26 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
A hobby.
Collecting stamps is a hobby. Building model ships, playing soccer, fishing..
Being a nerd or a geek? I don't really think that you can really classify that as a hobby, because it's too borad of a deffinition as it covers a very large spectrum of interests.

And, yes. i really do need a list, because i honestly have no idea what these ideals you believe should be glorified are.
User avatar #27 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
It's broad because it's been glorified and turned into a culture. It used to be just enjoying or having a passion for something outlandish.

...You can't be fucking serious right now

Ideals of bravery, determination, righteousness, good nature...

You need a list? An actual list to point out what ideals are good and should be viewed as good?

Holy fuck man, you really are something else, aren't you?
User avatar #30 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Skipping over your first absolutely absurd sentence. I really don't understand what you have against cultures forming, humans of similar interests and goals have been flocking together since the beginning
Well, first off the notion of "good" and indeed our perception of morality itself is entirely subjective and merely a product of the times we live in. As the ages pass, so do the beliefs on which we base our entire perception of reality. But let's set aside my slightly nihilistic outlook on life and focus on your disney-esque vision of virtue.
Do you believe that someone who has interest in or is a part of nerd culture is incapable of possesing these ideals which you so proudly extol?
The notion that they are not only incapable of such moral values (Something which you are not only insinuating, but downright propagating) , but are in fact possibly the exact opposite is both perplexing and contradictory as it is discriminatory, which does coincide with the ideal of righteousness.. at least not my understanding of it.
I am unable to comprehend your particular brand of insanity as it reeks of hypocrisy and close-minded ignorance.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I like how you pointed out how you were skipping over it and then...didn't. In any case, I have nothing against cultures forming, what I'm against is some guy thinking he's a fundamentally better person for liking one rock while some other dick likes sand. "Non-nerds don't apologize for being assholes", because THAT'S what it does. It divides and creates unnecessary friction and frustration.

Not we're getting into splitting hairs because you can't be bothered to make a single defining statement. Granted I'm sure if I brought up things like slavery or child killing you'd be very quick to inform me of the immortality of it all.

>I continue to grasp at straws to prove myself right when I am utterly without argument. So instead of making one I will completely remove the conversation from the original topic and insult you

I hope to have your level of debating skills one day.
User avatar #40 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
oh, and one final thing. Since i just can't stay away from fucktards.

Your arrogant ignorance is astoundingly infuriating. The problem with society is that it functions as a democracy, which is a flawed system.

Remember the divide you mentioned? I don't understand why you talk about it in a bad light. See, if i met you in real life, i'd probably hate you with a passion. Why in the fuck would i ever want to be anywhere near someone as arrogant, hypocritical, stupid and ignorant as yourself, let alone actually speak with you?

The problem with the democratic society is that loudmouth degenerates like you hold the majority vote. Anyone who does not adhere to your frankly idiotic vision of how people should act is labeled deffective or antisocial.
Have you ever stopped for a fucking minute to think that, "Hey, maybe they're not antisocial. Maybe they just don't want to talk with US because we have absolutely fuck all in common." Seriously. What the fuck do you think is going to happen? What, are you going to talk about a sports match with them? Are you high? Maybe they are absolutely uninterested in your stupid mundane life, and couldn't give less of a fuck about what you have to say?
"Nope, they don't want to talk about the inane shit i'm into they must be antisocial"

And not only that. You go as far as to actually villify them. VIllify! What the shit is actually wrong with you?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
User avatar #43 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Hush now, i know you're too stupid to forumulate any semblance of an actual valid argument. We shall speak of this no longer.

INB4 "Okay."
User avatar #45 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#47 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#49 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#51 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
Ok.
User avatar #35 - icefried (05/08/2014) [-]
By skipping over it, i meant i'd rather not go particularly in depth, but felt to point it out because i like pointing out stupidly obvious things.

Immortality?
I hope you mean immorality, otherwise i am incapable of divining the meaning behind you perplexing statement.
And if you did mean immorality then that just raises further question along the line of: Wouldn't anyone who falls under your frankly adorable list of ideals be "very quick to inform you of the immortality of it all"? I'd expect you to be the first to advocate against such atrocities.
The fact that you believe yourself without argument says much about your ability to comprehend the written word, so i am going to drop the facade of a well-spoken person because i'm starting to feel a wrench in my gut from all the passive aggressive pretentiousness.

You are a complete and utter fucking joke. You devalue a "culture" as you so delicately put it, simply because it doesn't coincide with your utterly fucking moronic belief on what should be "glorified"
Your obsession with this word is revolting, and your hypocrisy is nauseating.
So here are some arguments you illiterate twit:
1) Your deffinition of morality can go fuck itself. It's entirely subjective, and you don't get to tell people what the fuck they can and can not do.
2) Your absolutely daft idea that hobbies should stay personal is.. shockingly absolutely fucking retarded because people like to be around other people who share the same interests. It does not create any friction or frustration, not for them. They are having the time of their fucking lives there. For you, maybe. But no one really gives a shit what you think. And it divides? So what? If we removed everything that devided people and just stuck to things everyone can enjoy we'd be stuck in a bland homogenized gray piece of shit planet.
For your sake i hope you are trolling, because if not you are not only dangerously stupid, but disgustingly malignant.
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.
#11 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
<my face when trying not to take the bait
User avatar #13 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
I'm sorry sir, I don't mean to upset you, nor is it bait.

When I say that I hate it's become cool, it's no different than any other fad that was viewed as 'out-there' (such as goth, or emo) that suddenly became popular because being an outcast suddenly earned you more...maturity points, I guess.

When I talk about people going on and on about their own Introversion, I mean that they either pretend to be Introverted in order to fit in, think they're Introverted because they like to be alone sometimes, or even use Introversion as an escape from growing as a person ("Lol, I can't go outside without vomiting, guess I'm just an introvert!"
#14 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
I maybe see your point, but if you can't even go outside without vomiting you sure as hell are an introvert
User avatar #15 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Well no, Introverted is being able to thrive in isolation. Not being able to go outside without vomiting is social autism. Two completely different things.
#8 - anticitezenone (05/08/2014) [-]
Straight off the bat; you're a fucking faggot.

Let me iterate why.
Nerds/Geeks have been a thing since the fuckin' 90's with the comic books and Star Wars EU and whatever, so no, Geek 'culture' has not just suddenly popped up.
Second, it's not fucking popular to be unpopular. I'm a socially awkward perfectionist, so when I'm with people I barely fucking speak lest I fuck up and slightly offend someone. On the internet, I can piss off an entire website and not flinch a muscle.

The reason why you see all these 'anti-social' or 'introverted' people is because the internet is an introvert's playground, since you can do whatever the fuck you want without the terror of having to talk to people face-to-face. Extroverted people use websites like Facebook or Twitter while Introverted people use websites like 4chan and Reddit.

Nerd Culture exists on the internet like a Bacteria Culture exists on stagnant water. It's a perfect condition for them to exist in.

TL;DR you're a massive fucking faggot.
#44 - rakoom (05/08/2014) [-]
Dude, what the shit. I've never seen anybody misinterpret something and then go onto a raving ramble that harsh that COULD'VE been justified, if it wasn't for the fact that you got one thing wrong.

He's talking about the "nerdy xD" people, you twat.

Being a intelligent introvert spending their spare time collecting figurines, discussing Star Wars or some other SciFi serie on forums and gatherings, certainly has been around for a while. But have you noticed how a fuckton of the typical comics from girls on tumblr usually are "No, don't wanna go out. There are people out there!" in different forms, using different words, suddenly exploded in the last few years? Or perhaps the ever popular selfie-trend where there could be a whole branch of its own for "gamer girls" who pride themselves as girl gamers and make a big deal out of it?

This is aside from the decent artists that I see drawing fanworks, being nice and social at cons with their customes (or just being there for the experience itself and to have fun without making a custome), or people who actually ARE introverted instead of the cunts that brand themselves because they just don't like standing in a spotlight every once in a while.

He is right, so don't be a faggot.
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
This guy gets it. Although to do the others justice, I could have worded it a little better.
#52 - rakoom (05/08/2014) [-]
Cheers, mate.
User avatar #42 - minorian (05/08/2014) [-]
I think he is referring to the millions of "geek/nerd" girls on Tumblr, and not the occasional introvert fgt that only proves, why it's so ridicolous that being a "geek/nerd" has become popular.
User avatar #38 - friendshipsabitch (05/08/2014) [-]
Thats a pretty fukken sweet argument for someone who posts a picture of Lemonfont Faye
User avatar #16 - roodypoohero (05/08/2014) [-]
Damn, struck a nerve huh? He's right nerd culture is a thing and being a "nerd" or "geek" is cool. People who stay inside, browse the internet and play video games write on facebook or whatever the fuck "Lol I'm such a nerd xD" A good example of this is youtube where theres a shitload of "Lel so nerdy" shit. Before you tell me this was always the case it wasn't, I used to wear glasses and was unironically made fun of for wearing them and playing video games.
User avatar #10 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
"Suddenly become cool", I fail to see where I talked about it becoming a thing.

Right, sure you are. How would that change, really? If you were a perfectionist, wouldn't you want EVERYTHING that is an extension of you to be of the highest quality, even online? Unless, of course, you were just saying that...

I don't really see the difference, but alright. I'm sure if you went to Tumblr and called them Extroverted you would have an even worse reaction than the one you're giving me right now.

How did this even come to 'nerd culture' on the internet? I was talking about how people have this massive desire to seem introverted (which they do, as Introverts never seem to shut the hell up about being introverted, thanks for proving that yet again by the way, and that any time someone makes a joke about being Introverted people hop on their ass and rage at them while nobody cares about extroverts. You can even go back through my comments, see any one I've said about Introversion, and it would be thumbed down because that's what always happens when you make a slight crack at someones precious little persona) and how as a result it's become popular to be this way, to be flawed or to be like yourself where it earns you some badge of honour to suffer, I suppose.
#12 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
<pic related
#12 - "If you may only change one person in this world, let it … 05/07/2014 on Deep 0
#33 - >Implying Facebook isn't a single mom that wants you to loo…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/07/2014 on and then there is us +9
#76 - popnotes (05/08/2014) [-]
>Implying there isn't something good about each of those websites

Christ, lighten up.
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
>Not understanding jokes
User avatar #122 - popnotes (05/08/2014) [-]
>Making shitty jokes
#54 - anonymous (05/08/2014) [-]
>le may may arrows
fucking scrub
#55 - theberserker (05/08/2014) [-]
that gif though.....
#53 - juter (05/08/2014) [-]
>le may may arrows
fucking scrub
#94 - 1. Okay 2. Okay 3. You're knit-picking and s…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy +2
#100 - Blasphemer (05/07/2014) [-]
Of course it is possible. It's simply more possible that human kind never had any interaction with "God/s/sies" in any way.
#89 - We're discussing analogies here. People believe in god because…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy +2
#93 - Blasphemer (05/07/2014) [-]
1. yes.

2. possible.

3. more advanced could be defined with simply ability to maintain peace trough their own world, so yes. Some of them if existing could be more advanced. On that note, when do they exist is a more fascinating question. This planet alone as we know it exists for past 4.54 billions of years and we are here for, about 200k years (I've decided to round it up a bit). so, we exist in 0,00005% of earth's existence. Universe is approximated to be 13.8 billion of years old... They could've existed and already be extincted several times... Most of them could be still throwing shit at each other.

4. I highly doubt it. The closest planet that has possibility to sustain life is 12 light-years away, and that's the closest. I don't think anybody would undertake a trip that he would not survive, nor few generations of his offsprings to go here and fuck with locals.

5. The fact that they would be more advanced then us implies they would be more intelligent then us. That would pretty much prevent them for undertaking retarded missions.

Your "theory" is not impossible, neither is my ability to become 100 times richer then Bill Gates during my entire life. I just wouldn't bet on it.

Boom, I just wanted to say "boom".
User avatar #94 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
1. Okay

2. Okay

3. You're knit-picking and splitting hairs because you don't want to admit anything

4. You're still splitting hairs. This is why I went through the 'godlike power' question

5. And now you're making assumptions regarding what they would or would not do, despite the fact that our smartest scientists don't leave a single stone unturned when exploring something new

I know it's not impossible, that's why I said it. You don't have to bet on anything, I wasn't trying to make you religious, I was trying to make you see how it could be possible that a 'god' could exist.
#100 - Blasphemer (05/07/2014) [-]
Of course it is possible. It's simply more possible that human kind never had any interaction with "God/s/sies" in any way.
#77 - Ah, so would you just like to wait till the end of the univers…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy +2
#178 - Hightower (05/08/2014) [-]
No, because there is no such thing as magic. If you simply look at everything that was attributed to the supernatural in the past, things like dieses, lightning, the sun rising and setting, as well as a litany of other things that we now understand, and extrapolate, based on this sequence of events, we can see that with time we gain a greater understanding of the universe around us, and eventually there will be nothing left we can't explain. God, or rather the human need for god, will vanish. There is no proof at all for any "outside force" to have intervened. You can make up whatever you want, or follow what someone else made up, and claim it as fact because it can't be disproven. That doesn't make it real, or even likely.
You "proved" nothing, only that under the perfect circumstances., many things in the bible that were called miracles can be explained scientifically. If anything, you hurt your argument for god.
Also, posting things from personal blogs, wikipedia, and christian "science" websites is not going to convince anyone. That and everything Josephus ever wrote has been proven to be fraudulent.
Also "However, two problems emerge. First, Manetho was writing hundreds, even thousands of years after many of the actual events. Second, none of Manetho’s writings exist."
Seriously, nothing on any of the links you posted helps you out here...
User avatar #184 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.

Look man, I've been giving you link after link after link, all of them from different sources, all of them with different biases, but they all confirm what I've been talking about. If you REFUSE to see that, and completely ignore the content, it would be no different than me saying "Well you can't explain why the sky is blue, can you?" and once you do, I would say "No, no, no, you're wrong, you can't do it".

It's obvious that you're a temperamental child and will refuse to accept anything that goes against what you believe and the opinions you've already formed. So fine, you can be that way and I can go my way and this conversation can end because it's obvious that neither of us are listening to eachother.

Good day.
#187 - Hightower (05/12/2014) [-]
No, you posted a ton of links that all use the same source material. Wikipedia, personal blogs, and xtian science websites are not reliable sources of information.
I can explain why the sky is blue. I can point to peer reviewed science that shows why the sky is blue.

Really really wanting something to be true doesn't make it so, and believing something with no evidence is not a good thing.

I'm actually in my 30's. I was raised in a very religious family, but found the answer of "You just have to have faith rather lacking. I suggest you do as I did and actually read a bible. Front to back, at least once. I refuse to go backwards, and my beliefs have nothing to do with it. I'm not making fantastic claims that the universe was created just for one species of intelligent primate on one planet, in one galaxy, and that this creator not only created the entire universe for Humanity, but it actually took an interest in one tribe of desert nomads in the absolute least advanced place in that planet, and guided one group of them to safety, while murdering hundreds, if not thousand of others. Add to that that this divine being always knew these things were going to happen, but did nothing to prevent it, and the oly thing you have to show this even happened are the writings of a fraud from hundreds of years later.
Believing the bible to be true is like someone from the year 4000 reading IT by Stephen King and believing all those things happen every so often in Derry Maine, because there is a book that says it did, and Derry is a real place.
#72 - Also: So now … 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy +1
#69 - It's alright, I enjoy debating. Thank you though. 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy 0
#68 - "some known answers are so unlikely to ever have occurred…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy +1
#74 - Hightower (05/07/2014) [-]
Yet. You keep forgetting that part. We don't know yet, and that is the difference, religion says "We know! It was (insert invisible friend here) that did it!"
Science says "We don't know yet, but we have a theory. Lets see if we can prove it wrong!"
Yes I read them, most of the are at least 4 years old, so I've had time. The red sea parting basically says IF the wind was just right, and the tide was low enough, the sea might have receded.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
Ah, so would you just like to wait till the end of the universe, then I could present you with something still unexplained, and you'd pass if off as magic then? Is that what you're saying?

I'm not arguing whether god is real or not, or whether these things happened word for word as they do in the bible. I'm arguing that these things COULD happen, which I proved, that they did, which I proved, that multiple accounts of it existed long ago, which I proved, and that an outside force could manipulate natural occurrence in their favour, which is...highly probable, I mean really...

To be honest I really don't care about what you think the difference between Science and Religion is, as that's not what we're arguing.

Well it really doesn't seem like you did, nor that you even looked them up at a previous date despite you stoutly claiming that it never happened (which is wrong), and that there is no proof of it outside of the bible (also wrong).

Yes that's right. We both agree on that.
#178 - Hightower (05/08/2014) [-]
No, because there is no such thing as magic. If you simply look at everything that was attributed to the supernatural in the past, things like dieses, lightning, the sun rising and setting, as well as a litany of other things that we now understand, and extrapolate, based on this sequence of events, we can see that with time we gain a greater understanding of the universe around us, and eventually there will be nothing left we can't explain. God, or rather the human need for god, will vanish. There is no proof at all for any "outside force" to have intervened. You can make up whatever you want, or follow what someone else made up, and claim it as fact because it can't be disproven. That doesn't make it real, or even likely.
You "proved" nothing, only that under the perfect circumstances., many things in the bible that were called miracles can be explained scientifically. If anything, you hurt your argument for god.
Also, posting things from personal blogs, wikipedia, and christian "science" websites is not going to convince anyone. That and everything Josephus ever wrote has been proven to be fraudulent.
Also "However, two problems emerge. First, Manetho was writing hundreds, even thousands of years after many of the actual events. Second, none of Manetho’s writings exist."
Seriously, nothing on any of the links you posted helps you out here...
User avatar #184 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.

Look man, I've been giving you link after link after link, all of them from different sources, all of them with different biases, but they all confirm what I've been talking about. If you REFUSE to see that, and completely ignore the content, it would be no different than me saying "Well you can't explain why the sky is blue, can you?" and once you do, I would say "No, no, no, you're wrong, you can't do it".

It's obvious that you're a temperamental child and will refuse to accept anything that goes against what you believe and the opinions you've already formed. So fine, you can be that way and I can go my way and this conversation can end because it's obvious that neither of us are listening to eachother.

Good day.
#187 - Hightower (05/12/2014) [-]
No, you posted a ton of links that all use the same source material. Wikipedia, personal blogs, and xtian science websites are not reliable sources of information.
I can explain why the sky is blue. I can point to peer reviewed science that shows why the sky is blue.

Really really wanting something to be true doesn't make it so, and believing something with no evidence is not a good thing.

I'm actually in my 30's. I was raised in a very religious family, but found the answer of "You just have to have faith rather lacking. I suggest you do as I did and actually read a bible. Front to back, at least once. I refuse to go backwards, and my beliefs have nothing to do with it. I'm not making fantastic claims that the universe was created just for one species of intelligent primate on one planet, in one galaxy, and that this creator not only created the entire universe for Humanity, but it actually took an interest in one tribe of desert nomads in the absolute least advanced place in that planet, and guided one group of them to safety, while murdering hundreds, if not thousand of others. Add to that that this divine being always knew these things were going to happen, but did nothing to prevent it, and the oly thing you have to show this even happened are the writings of a fraud from hundreds of years later.
Believing the bible to be true is like someone from the year 4000 reading IT by Stephen King and believing all those things happen every so often in Derry Maine, because there is a book that says it did, and Derry is a real place.
#62 - Never said it did. Ah, my mistake. …  [+] (11 new replies) 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy 0
User avatar #65 - shieldanvil (05/07/2014) [-]
Dude don't argue with him, I realized far to late that I was arguing with an idiot, He is going to drag you down to his level of stupidity and beat you with experience. You have been warned
User avatar #136 - broswagonist (05/07/2014) [-]
Actually, you typed two comments and then gave up. I'm sorry to say it's easy to see you're the idiot in this situation. I can tell from the pixels and having seen many religious arguments on the internet.
User avatar #69 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
It's alright, I enjoy debating. Thank you though.
#64 - Hightower (05/07/2014) [-]
And if you had read any of them beyond the headline you would have seen "Climatologists studying the ancient climate at the time have discovered a dramatic shift in the climate in the area occurred towards the end of Rameses the Second's reign." and other scientific explanations for how those things could have happened. Please note, every article there says "But rather than explaining them as the wrathful act of a vengeful God, the scientists claim the plagues can be attributed to a chain of natural phenomena triggered by changes in the climate and environmental disasters that happened hundreds of miles away." or something to that effect.
I'm starting to doubt you even read the headlines, or you probably wouldn't have included "blogs.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tomchivers/100047210/moses-parting-the-red-sea-it-could-have-happened-probably-didnt-but-could-have/ "
"The Biblical parting of the Red Sea could have happened, according to new research – which of course tells us nothing about whether it actually did."
Let me rephrase so you don't have to google mine some more headlines. There is not one written record from the time these events took place, except the bible, that mentions them at all.
User avatar #68 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
"some known answers are so unlikely to ever have occurred at all that even scientists are baffled as to how it might have ever happened so smoothly" You seem to have missed that part of my previous comment.

What, does something have to be completely unexplained for you to believe it to be the work of an outside force? Well, we already went through that, and you gave the wise answer of "Just because something is unexplained doesn't mean it can't be explained"

See, now you're just backing yourself into a corner where you cannot possibly be wrong because you simply do not allow yourself to be. If I provide you evidence of something great you'd say "Natural forces made it", if I provided you with evidence of something great that natural forces did not make, you'd say "They did, we just don't know how".

I did read the titles actually which is exactly why I sent them to you. All of them. All those multiple sources while you only stress on one. Good for you, I guess. Have YOU read them all though?
"Lead researcher Carl Drews, from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, said: "The simulations match fairly closely with the account in Exodus. 'People have always been fascinated by this Exodus story, wondering if it comes from historical facts. What this study shows is that the description of the waters parting indeed has a basis in physical laws."

That link doesn't actually give any evidence as to why it didn't happen either. It even ADMITS it could have (while others admit it did) and then criticizes the extent of the 'miracle'. So it's right up your alley, really.
#74 - Hightower (05/07/2014) [-]
Yet. You keep forgetting that part. We don't know yet, and that is the difference, religion says "We know! It was (insert invisible friend here) that did it!"
Science says "We don't know yet, but we have a theory. Lets see if we can prove it wrong!"
Yes I read them, most of the are at least 4 years old, so I've had time. The red sea parting basically says IF the wind was just right, and the tide was low enough, the sea might have receded.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
Ah, so would you just like to wait till the end of the universe, then I could present you with something still unexplained, and you'd pass if off as magic then? Is that what you're saying?

I'm not arguing whether god is real or not, or whether these things happened word for word as they do in the bible. I'm arguing that these things COULD happen, which I proved, that they did, which I proved, that multiple accounts of it existed long ago, which I proved, and that an outside force could manipulate natural occurrence in their favour, which is...highly probable, I mean really...

To be honest I really don't care about what you think the difference between Science and Religion is, as that's not what we're arguing.

Well it really doesn't seem like you did, nor that you even looked them up at a previous date despite you stoutly claiming that it never happened (which is wrong), and that there is no proof of it outside of the bible (also wrong).

Yes that's right. We both agree on that.
#178 - Hightower (05/08/2014) [-]
No, because there is no such thing as magic. If you simply look at everything that was attributed to the supernatural in the past, things like dieses, lightning, the sun rising and setting, as well as a litany of other things that we now understand, and extrapolate, based on this sequence of events, we can see that with time we gain a greater understanding of the universe around us, and eventually there will be nothing left we can't explain. God, or rather the human need for god, will vanish. There is no proof at all for any "outside force" to have intervened. You can make up whatever you want, or follow what someone else made up, and claim it as fact because it can't be disproven. That doesn't make it real, or even likely.
You "proved" nothing, only that under the perfect circumstances., many things in the bible that were called miracles can be explained scientifically. If anything, you hurt your argument for god.
Also, posting things from personal blogs, wikipedia, and christian "science" websites is not going to convince anyone. That and everything Josephus ever wrote has been proven to be fraudulent.
Also "However, two problems emerge. First, Manetho was writing hundreds, even thousands of years after many of the actual events. Second, none of Manetho’s writings exist."
Seriously, nothing on any of the links you posted helps you out here...
User avatar #184 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
Okay.

Look man, I've been giving you link after link after link, all of them from different sources, all of them with different biases, but they all confirm what I've been talking about. If you REFUSE to see that, and completely ignore the content, it would be no different than me saying "Well you can't explain why the sky is blue, can you?" and once you do, I would say "No, no, no, you're wrong, you can't do it".

It's obvious that you're a temperamental child and will refuse to accept anything that goes against what you believe and the opinions you've already formed. So fine, you can be that way and I can go my way and this conversation can end because it's obvious that neither of us are listening to eachother.

Good day.
#187 - Hightower (05/12/2014) [-]
No, you posted a ton of links that all use the same source material. Wikipedia, personal blogs, and xtian science websites are not reliable sources of information.
I can explain why the sky is blue. I can point to peer reviewed science that shows why the sky is blue.

Really really wanting something to be true doesn't make it so, and believing something with no evidence is not a good thing.

I'm actually in my 30's. I was raised in a very religious family, but found the answer of "You just have to have faith rather lacking. I suggest you do as I did and actually read a bible. Front to back, at least once. I refuse to go backwards, and my beliefs have nothing to do with it. I'm not making fantastic claims that the universe was created just for one species of intelligent primate on one planet, in one galaxy, and that this creator not only created the entire universe for Humanity, but it actually took an interest in one tribe of desert nomads in the absolute least advanced place in that planet, and guided one group of them to safety, while murdering hundreds, if not thousand of others. Add to that that this divine being always knew these things were going to happen, but did nothing to prevent it, and the oly thing you have to show this even happened are the writings of a fraud from hundreds of years later.
Believing the bible to be true is like someone from the year 4000 reading IT by Stephen King and believing all those things happen every so often in Derry Maine, because there is a book that says it did, and Derry is a real place.
#60 - *Theology is like being in a dark room and believing that ther…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/07/2014 on The black cat analogy +23
#181 - theruse (05/08/2014) [-]
May I use your comment in the future if I give you credit?
User avatar #183 - captainfuckitall (05/08/2014) [-]
You could use it even if you didn't. Knowledge is free to everyone, so it wouldn't matter to me either way.
#88 - Blasphemer (05/07/2014) [-]
*Theology is like being in a dark room and believing that there is a black cat because you can hear meowing someone told you there was meowing few thousand years ago

Yea, fuck it, I'm not doing the rest: CTRL+C, CTRL+V.
User avatar #89 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
We're discussing analogies here. People believe in god because they don't think the universe could have come from nothing, and it's that simple.

Here, we'll find that a god is capable of existing in a few easy steps. Ready? Here we go

Do you believe the universe is infinite (or at least, very large)?
Do you believe aliens exist in the universe?
Do you believe that at least one of these species is more advanced than us, possessing what we would believe to be god like power?
Do you believe these aliens can interact with us?
Do you believe anything prevented them from interacting with us a few thousand years ago?

Boom, there we go. It's not that hard.
#93 - Blasphemer (05/07/2014) [-]
1. yes.

2. possible.

3. more advanced could be defined with simply ability to maintain peace trough their own world, so yes. Some of them if existing could be more advanced. On that note, when do they exist is a more fascinating question. This planet alone as we know it exists for past 4.54 billions of years and we are here for, about 200k years (I've decided to round it up a bit). so, we exist in 0,00005% of earth's existence. Universe is approximated to be 13.8 billion of years old... They could've existed and already be extincted several times... Most of them could be still throwing shit at each other.

4. I highly doubt it. The closest planet that has possibility to sustain life is 12 light-years away, and that's the closest. I don't think anybody would undertake a trip that he would not survive, nor few generations of his offsprings to go here and fuck with locals.

5. The fact that they would be more advanced then us implies they would be more intelligent then us. That would pretty much prevent them for undertaking retarded missions.

Your "theory" is not impossible, neither is my ability to become 100 times richer then Bill Gates during my entire life. I just wouldn't bet on it.

Boom, I just wanted to say "boom".
User avatar #94 - captainfuckitall (05/07/2014) [-]
1. Okay

2. Okay

3. You're knit-picking and splitting hairs because you don't want to admit anything

4. You're still splitting hairs. This is why I went through the 'godlike power' question

5. And now you're making assumptions regarding what they would or would not do, despite the fact that our smartest scientists don't leave a single stone unturned when exploring something new

I know it's not impossible, that's why I said it. You don't have to bet on anything, I wasn't trying to make you religious, I was trying to make you see how it could be possible that a 'god' could exist.
#100 - Blasphemer (05/07/2014) [-]
Of course it is possible. It's simply more possible that human kind never had any interaction with "God/s/sies" in any way.
#84 - delio (05/07/2014) [-]
That might be one of the best explanations for something involving both religion and secularism.

Comments(481):

[ 481 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no fucking mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for shit",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty fucked in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
&quot;Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'.&quot; - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - anonymous (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
[ 481 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)