x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1748
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 59735 total,  73278 ,  13543
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 81.49% (815/1000)
Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 354 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10899
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16978
FJ Points:26047

latest user's comments

#32 - Jeez, how much propaganda have YOU been swallowing? H…  [+] (8 new replies) 12/15/2013 on Nazi Wonder Weapons PART 5 +14
#186 - anonymous (12/16/2013) [-]
So jews aren't people?
#188 - wroughten (12/16/2013) [-]
no... duh
User avatar #187 - captainfuckitall (12/16/2013) [-]
Not "his" people, no. And that's not a very bold statement either considering many jews at the time prior to WW2 would have agreed.
User avatar #149 - shemaledong (12/16/2013) [-]
Hitler didn`t give a shit about his people. He was a Psychopath. That means he had no empathy whatsoever. Psychopaths can make you like them very much. In his case, people stil feel affiliated to him up to date, ignoring his deeds completly.
A good example on how much he cared for his people is the "Volkssturm".
At the end of the war everybody, even seniors were sent to fight trained allied soldiers with insufficient weapons and training. If they refused, they were shot Hitler knew they would die, but he thought the german people were unworthy to live, since they lost the war which deemed them weak.
User avatar #176 - captainfuckitall (12/16/2013) [-]
That's true, except for the fact that it wasn't.

He wasn't a Psychopath, he loved animals, his mother, he was very devoted to his friends, and doting on his own personal workers.

And no, he didn't think they were "unworthy to live" because they lost.

I have no idea where you're pulling this information from, but it's wrong. Perhaps you should do more research than watching movies specifically meant to dehumanize him, yes?
User avatar #52 - thepastryistrue (12/15/2013) [-]
You're misinformed in some points here: 1. Hitler did not smoke to be a leading example. There are more non-smokers out there then smokers and it's not a challenge to be a non-smoker, it's the regular case. 2. Hitler was not a vegetarian. This is something that has been said by historians in the post-war era to show Hitler to be somehow 'abnormal'. Being a vegetarian was not accepted back then like it is today. Heck, they even wrote about him being sexually driven towards his mother, towards his jewish housemaiden and most likely to be a masochist and a clandestine homosexual. There was no evidence whatsoever to proove these 'accusations'.
And, most importantly: 3. He did not actually considered himself to be the property of his people. The will of the people cristallises in the person of the Führer. Thus the Führer is the people and the people is the Führer. That was the idea, not some kind of possession.
User avatar #63 - commontroll (12/15/2013) [-]
This was the 30s. EVERYBODY smoked back then. Other than that I have no comments.
User avatar #61 - captainfuckitall (12/15/2013) [-]
While it may be true that there are more non-smokers than smokers now and it is easier to be a non-smoker, he said multiple times that he had to live a long time for his people and not smoking was one of the things he detailed as best. Thus it could be said he DID not smoke for his health, thus for his people (and he was offered to do so when fighting in WW1, and gods know he probably could have used some then).

Regarding Vegetarianism, we may both be half right: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler_and_vegetarianism

On the third one, I'm not so sure. What you say sounds convincing, but Hitler himself was also very patriotic and dedicated to his country and people. And I heard many times that he considered himself "belonging" to Germany. In any case I suppose I will do more research regarding the matter.
#15 - [Citation Given]  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2013 on Dr. Seuss +4
#24 - thasmackdown (12/15/2013) [-]
but its a wiki citation : /

Just a Data farm, I'de really like for a reliable source on this.
#13 - [Citation Needed]  [+] (3 new replies) 12/15/2013 on Dr. Seuss +13
#14 - anonymous (12/15/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Seuss#Later_years

Second last paragraph of that section of that article:
"On October 23, 1967, suffering from a long struggle with illnesses including cancer—as well as emotional pain over her husband's affair with Audrey Stone Dimond—Geisel's wife, Helen Palmer Geisel, committed suicide.[48]"
User avatar #15 - captainfuckitall (12/15/2013) [-]
[Citation Given]
#24 - thasmackdown (12/15/2013) [-]
but its a wiki citation : /

Just a Data farm, I'de really like for a reliable source on this.
#6 - Sharing is Communism. 12/14/2013 on Sharing is fun ~ 0
#49 - She's Toradorable 12/14/2013 on not sure if SFW..... +10
#337 - It's fine. I do believe it was in this book… 12/14/2013 on Native Americans 0
#67 - Actually they weren't "driven back" at all. This lit…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/13/2013 on Native Americans +21
User avatar #216 - lazypaul (12/14/2013) [-]
Source? Not that I'm calling you a liar I just want to know.
User avatar #337 - captainfuckitall (12/14/2013) [-]
It's fine.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycWXeOyObzU

I do believe it was in this book somewhere. Although I don't remember the exact chapter (although I'd say to listen to it all anyways. It's really good)
#13 - Inch for inch, yes. But in general, no; simply because bone is… 12/13/2013 on Larch Dance +2
#156 - No, you don't seem to understand. The story of David and Golia… 12/13/2013 on [Insert Title] 0
#285 - Indeed it is, yet again, it's more common to portray "bea…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/12/2013 on ooooo 0
User avatar #288 - hoponthefeelstrain (12/12/2013) [-]
I think it really depends on your face, if you're large and have an ugly face neither sex will find you attractive.
#21 - Ah, but what if Russia was set up to attack you first? Would y…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/12/2013 on Found this in my older folder +4
#30 - slias (12/12/2013) [-]
Most records indicate that Stalin actually liked Hitler, so I think that Stalin may very well adhere to the non-aggression pact.

Mass-producing of planes would be required if an invasion of the British Isles was to succeed.

I would hopefully maintain an offensive and thus never have to actually defend the beaches.

I would keep my spies performing counter-intelligence of our own and tracking down members of the various resistance movements.

Finally, I would of course be nice to my scientists and would probably nudge them in the general direction of an atomic bomb.
#17 - Actually, a surprising number of things detailed in religious …  [+] (3 new replies) 12/12/2013 on [Insert Title] -2
User avatar #117 - mrgreatnamess (12/12/2013) [-]
Just like a bunch of stuff that happens in normal fiction, happens in real life.
User avatar #156 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2013) [-]
No, you don't seem to understand. The story of David and Goliath for example that many people thought was fake for a long time happened to be real after discovering a set of abnormally large bones in the area. As it turns out Goliath suffered from a disease (of which I can't remember the name) that causes your muscles and bones to never really stop growing. Because his view was blocked by excess muscle under his eye, he didn't see David sneaking up under him and when David threw the rock it caused a hemorrhage in Goliath's brain.

That type of thing, I mean.
User avatar #18 - commandershit (12/12/2013) [-]
I know , that's why its so rood

but damn , a random sky laser carving shit into stone , THAT is fantasy
#52 - Eh, I'm pretty apathetic to the issue of gay marriage. I think… 12/12/2013 on Pretty Accurate 0
#29 - I have never once heard in the media or by any institutional f…  [+] (4 new replies) 12/12/2013 on ooooo +16
User avatar #280 - hoponthefeelstrain (12/12/2013) [-]
Because being out of shape is unhealthy. Being ugly isn't really negative on your health. And the media claims girls look better without make up but actresses always come out with tons of it on and so do models.
User avatar #285 - captainfuckitall (12/12/2013) [-]
Indeed it is, yet again, it's more common to portray "beautiful large women" than "handsome large men". Indeed they do, but so do men, so your point is invalid.
User avatar #288 - hoponthefeelstrain (12/12/2013) [-]
I think it really depends on your face, if you're large and have an ugly face neither sex will find you attractive.
User avatar #49 - wolviewolverine (12/12/2013) [-]
hmm.. seems like we can conclude that men indeed are godly handsome race and human women are just furless apes we met on this planet and befriended.
#10 - I, too, love the taste of 5 guys. 12/11/2013 on giggidy either way +9
#25 - Now take a **** off it.  [+] (2 new replies) 12/11/2013 on Times square from above +4
User avatar #37 - hawaiianman (12/11/2013) [-]
I think I would have constipation and fall backwards down because I "Huungggh"ed too hard.
User avatar #46 - Scenekid (12/12/2013) [-]
I laughed WAY harder than I should have at this
#13 - How the **** does a guy drawing reverse Wolverines remi…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/11/2013 on Inverted Color +7
User avatar #14 - mastermonorail (12/11/2013) [-]
The way he has a pencil in his mouth. Just like the Knitter had a knit-thingy in his mouth.
User avatar #85 - themightymrplow (12/12/2013) [-]
Thumbed for knit-thingy
#157 - Hmm, well there is charity, there is the hundreds upon thousan…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/11/2013 on Inb4 religious shitstorm 0
User avatar #162 - kousei (12/11/2013) [-]
you have many fair points that i cannot effectively rebuttal, however i cannot grant you religion contributing to science, engineering is fine, science... no. If you hold all else determined and remove religion from the equation these great minds would still make their discoveries. However, religion has kept down many great minds in history. So I cannot permit you that. (also, i don't think atheist genius is any better than theist genius)
#4 - If you use it too soon, it's not funny.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/11/2013 on middle-aged parents 0
#6 - anonymous (12/11/2013) [-]
Thats what the government wants you to think.
#71 - Actually, while you do have logical points, your rationale fal…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/11/2013 on Inb4 religious shitstorm 0
User avatar #140 - kousei (12/11/2013) [-]
I will admit I did have some flaws in my argument, though I would appreciate some examples of other good things that can be attributed to religion. Otherwise you have a really strong case until you examine the other extreme. I'll get back to that one though.

While my examples may have been restricted to the sects of one religion the general concept that is religion still asks for blind faith. They ask you to suspend your powers of observation and reason so you can believe in something greater. This is all well and good, shouldn't matter too much, but you do it in large groups. As I stated, I have nothing against faith, it's when the faithful gather under a single person that there becomes an issue.

I suppose that's the real heart of it, the organization. It only takes one bad man in one position of power and those faithful and good will do terrible things. That's the other extreme, those so good they will do bad because it is by the command of their supreme good.

Now, I unfortunately do not have forceful examples of other bad things brought about by religion, but I will point out that while religion was at the height of it's power many people refused to talk to other who had a different faith, which likely contributed to political friction and scientific stagnation.
User avatar #157 - captainfuckitall (12/11/2013) [-]
Hmm, well there is charity, there is the hundreds upon thousands of restoration movements within the last half-century alone that was based off of religious missions, there is the benefit if had to early civilizations (as they made great strides in engineering for temple building alone), some of the earliest writings were done only to record religious texts, it GAVE great strides to scientific development as many of the greatest scientists, astronomers, and alchemists were very religious (and yes I can use that one, as many Atheists will readily claim Atheism is a boon to Science). And I can't think of any more at the moment but I will tell you if I do.

Actually that too is usually under only Monotheistic faiths, and those are the smallest and also the most recent of the religious branch. Many "universal" or pantheistic faiths ADVOCATE asking questions, using powers of logic and reasoning, and NOT following blindly (as if you did you were liable to piss off a god).

Hmm, indeed I can see where that would be a problem, and admit that monotheistic religions should fix that readily, HOWEVER! It's also true that such a trait could be used to HELP, as one man could command all to give everything to help others and they would follow. Surely it is not the religions fault it has corrupt officials, but rather, the officials' fault.

While you are correct in Religion attributing to sociological friction, sometimes to such extremes that people commit mass murders, surely we can both agree that it is not so much the religions' fault as it is plain Xenophobia. If it wasn't religion, they would find something else to hate people over, as that is the nature of hate. I'm not saying that EXCUSES religion, I'm just saying it doesn't make it WORSE.
User avatar #162 - kousei (12/11/2013) [-]
you have many fair points that i cannot effectively rebuttal, however i cannot grant you religion contributing to science, engineering is fine, science... no. If you hold all else determined and remove religion from the equation these great minds would still make their discoveries. However, religion has kept down many great minds in history. So I cannot permit you that. (also, i don't think atheist genius is any better than theist genius)
#62 - 1. Not all religions teach peace, some actually embrace violen…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/11/2013 on Inb4 religious shitstorm 0
User avatar #67 - kousei (12/11/2013) [-]
That's a yes and no there.

Assuming your supporting statements are true it kind of puts your thesis in a slump. You say religion has helped more than hinder. However religion only helps in two ways, by providing a moral compass and by giving hope to the destitute. By your supporting statement that good men do good regardless and bad men to bad the moral compass has failed. This leaves the boons to only giving hope.

Now, let us assume there was a flaw in you supporting statements and there are indeed some otherwise wicked people that did good instead thanks solely to religion. Even this does not exceed, or even counter-act, the negative impact of religion. Consider this, the first man to say the world was round was excommunicated by the church, tried for heresy, and to avoid death had to write that his statement was wrong. No one even explored the idea of a round earth for at least another hundred years. Congratulations, civilization and technology was set back a century due to the church.

This even ignores the Holy Wars, Inquisitions, and Witch Hunts that all came about because of religion.

On the "yes" side though, I believe that faith the tool of religion and the teachings of some religions have dampened the negative forces of the world, persuading them a bit closer to good than other forces would normally allow them.

All in all though, I cannot agree with your statement, but I cannot disagree with your faith either. My issue is with the organization that gave you your faith, not your faith itself.
User avatar #71 - captainfuckitall (12/11/2013) [-]
Actually, while you do have logical points, your rationale falls upon right on the first paragraph because it's only your opinion that they help with those two things alone. But I will rebuttle regardless.

Yes, that's all well and good, but you have three problems with that statement: One, even if there was a flaw, there would be more bad people doing good over religion than good people doing bad. As good people naturally do not want to harm and would serve a loving god, they would find reasons not to hurt. But an evil man might just have enough sense of duty to follow the orders of a kind god and control his urges to do right instead of wrong.

Two: That does not negate what I said at first at all. If people are bad they do bad regardless of beliefs and those men wanted to keep power and so they used religion as a back-up. That's all.

Three: You're only quoting one religion or faith out of the roughly 28,000 or so that have been in existence since the first civilization, so the proportion of "evil to good" doesn't exactly match up.

You also assume I'm religious, and probably christian (while you would be right about the first, you would not be about the second).
User avatar #140 - kousei (12/11/2013) [-]
I will admit I did have some flaws in my argument, though I would appreciate some examples of other good things that can be attributed to religion. Otherwise you have a really strong case until you examine the other extreme. I'll get back to that one though.

While my examples may have been restricted to the sects of one religion the general concept that is religion still asks for blind faith. They ask you to suspend your powers of observation and reason so you can believe in something greater. This is all well and good, shouldn't matter too much, but you do it in large groups. As I stated, I have nothing against faith, it's when the faithful gather under a single person that there becomes an issue.

I suppose that's the real heart of it, the organization. It only takes one bad man in one position of power and those faithful and good will do terrible things. That's the other extreme, those so good they will do bad because it is by the command of their supreme good.

Now, I unfortunately do not have forceful examples of other bad things brought about by religion, but I will point out that while religion was at the height of it's power many people refused to talk to other who had a different faith, which likely contributed to political friction and scientific stagnation.
User avatar #157 - captainfuckitall (12/11/2013) [-]
Hmm, well there is charity, there is the hundreds upon thousands of restoration movements within the last half-century alone that was based off of religious missions, there is the benefit if had to early civilizations (as they made great strides in engineering for temple building alone), some of the earliest writings were done only to record religious texts, it GAVE great strides to scientific development as many of the greatest scientists, astronomers, and alchemists were very religious (and yes I can use that one, as many Atheists will readily claim Atheism is a boon to Science). And I can't think of any more at the moment but I will tell you if I do.

Actually that too is usually under only Monotheistic faiths, and those are the smallest and also the most recent of the religious branch. Many "universal" or pantheistic faiths ADVOCATE asking questions, using powers of logic and reasoning, and NOT following blindly (as if you did you were liable to piss off a god).

Hmm, indeed I can see where that would be a problem, and admit that monotheistic religions should fix that readily, HOWEVER! It's also true that such a trait could be used to HELP, as one man could command all to give everything to help others and they would follow. Surely it is not the religions fault it has corrupt officials, but rather, the officials' fault.

While you are correct in Religion attributing to sociological friction, sometimes to such extremes that people commit mass murders, surely we can both agree that it is not so much the religions' fault as it is plain Xenophobia. If it wasn't religion, they would find something else to hate people over, as that is the nature of hate. I'm not saying that EXCUSES religion, I'm just saying it doesn't make it WORSE.
User avatar #162 - kousei (12/11/2013) [-]
you have many fair points that i cannot effectively rebuttal, however i cannot grant you religion contributing to science, engineering is fine, science... no. If you hold all else determined and remove religion from the equation these great minds would still make their discoveries. However, religion has kept down many great minds in history. So I cannot permit you that. (also, i don't think atheist genius is any better than theist genius)
#6 - Oh wow, your story has completely changed my views! I have nev… 12/11/2013 on look at the description 0
#6 - And so it was done. And it was awesome. 12/10/2013 on How Hell was created -1
#26 - Eh, I'd much rather have it so anyone voting would have to tak… 12/10/2013 on Thoughts on voting 0
#6 - I would actually buy that if they sold it, because I love spic… 12/10/2013 on Pure Evil 0

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)