Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

captainfuckitall

Rank #348 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 349 Comments: Sold Soul
Online
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#348
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 34 total,  90 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 53291 total,  65079 ,  11788
Content Level Progress: 66.1% (39/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 24% (240/1000)
Level 349 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 350 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:21
Content Views:9754
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:15491
FJ Points:21465

latest user's comments

#30 - Perhaps we just see different comments. From what I see, those…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/03/2013 on This +2
User avatar #34 - endexter (10/03/2013) [-]
well both femnazi's and friendzone complaints contained valid social criticisms but they're fads with this site. like you said with the friendzone comments being mocked, i even see irreverent femnazi comments thumbed down.
i guess my point is that even though it's not talked about much anymore because it's not the hot topic, those people are still here and active, and do the same things they don't like being done to them
#18 - Actually, I haven't seen anyone complain about the 'friendzone…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/03/2013 on This +1
User avatar #19 - endexter (10/03/2013) [-]
are you sure? i know it has kinda taken a backseat to femnazis as the hot topic for several weeks but i still see a few posts about friendzone, being lonely, misogyny in respect to female approach to dating etc fairly regularly if nothing big in the news is going on
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (10/03/2013) [-]
Perhaps we just see different comments. From what I see, those who complain about 'friendzones' tend to be mocked, while lonliness and misogyny are still fairly common in SOME areas.

At least it's not as misinformed as it once was. Hatred of Feminism, I mean
User avatar #34 - endexter (10/03/2013) [-]
well both femnazi's and friendzone complaints contained valid social criticisms but they're fads with this site. like you said with the friendzone comments being mocked, i even see irreverent femnazi comments thumbed down.
i guess my point is that even though it's not talked about much anymore because it's not the hot topic, those people are still here and active, and do the same things they don't like being done to them
#5 - Stop posting this or you'll drive it into the ground faster th… 10/02/2013 on GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN +13
#14 - I was unaware that 'Canadian' was a political background. 10/02/2013 on That's what you get bitch! 0
#1 - Something tells me a Liberal College student, who most likely …  [+] (7 new replies) 10/02/2013 on That's what you get bitch! +59
User avatar #10 - theshadowed (10/02/2013) [-]
Gosh life is so hard for those students. Imagine having your parents bankroll you through college? The horror...
User avatar #4 - thehooligan (10/02/2013) [-]
Adderal is a hell of a drug.
User avatar #2 - blayneket (10/02/2013) [-]
Actually it was a most likely a Canadian

Neighbourhood (Canadian) V. Neighborhood (American)
User avatar #14 - captainfuckitall (10/02/2013) [-]
I was unaware that 'Canadian' was a political background.
#3 - timerce (10/02/2013) [-]
that doesnt mean it couldnt have been a liberal college student. they have colleges and anti-establishment students in canada too
User avatar #6 - furdabip (10/02/2013) [-]
As a Canadian myself, I can confirm this.
User avatar #9 - stallwallwriter (10/02/2013) [-]
I think it's kind of a douchey thing and I fit the description of everything said here.
Including Canadian! What's up buddy?
#11 - Don't you ******* lie to me, you know what this …  [+] (7 new replies) 10/02/2013 on I guess the nostalgia feels.. +20
User avatar #31 - ChaosShuffle (10/02/2013) [-]
Oh my god....
User avatar #27 - sexymeme (10/02/2013) [-]
They're making another one.
www.blackspears.com/simgirls-lovemore.html
#20 - asgardianleo (10/02/2013) [-]
My man! god I haven't seen that in years. Good times.
User avatar #19 - mexicandudeinsd (10/02/2013) [-]
whats that?
User avatar #18 - moviefuckthewhat (10/02/2013) [-]
Hell yeah, Motherfucker.

Tomoko was always worst girl in my opinion. But I chose her anyway since she was the only girl with an ending at the time.
User avatar #15 - heyimmalk (10/02/2013) [-]
It's finished now, if you didn't know.
#14 - demented (10/02/2013) [-]
oh wow haven't seen that in a while
#7 - Don't you have squirrels you should be chasing? 10/02/2013 on I can't get no sleep 0
#28 - Yes and no. Ethnicities mix just fine, it's cultures that can …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/02/2013 on pride or racism +4
#55 - mattdoggy (10/02/2013) [-]
this guy gets it
#6 - I don't believe it 10/02/2013 on What a coincidence. 0
#11 - Siri may not give a **** , but she SHOULDN'T give …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/02/2013 on Siri dont give a fuck 0
User avatar #12 - lurifax (10/02/2013) [-]
She is a program

BEEP BOOP
#14 - The Pug isn't missing his neck That's just a regular Pug. 10/02/2013 on ANIMALS WITHOUT NECKS!!! 0
#15 - He looks like someone started gluing handheld electronics to h… 10/02/2013 on Felt like sharing 0
#43 - Implying a cat would even give a **** . 10/02/2013 on That story! +5
#111 - But then, again, what is the point of morality at all? If peop… 10/02/2013 on 2+2=? 0
#110 - Theories can, and have been proven countless times before. Aga… 10/02/2013 on 2+2=? 0
#109 - Indeed, and Socrates was against freedom of speech, that doesn… 10/02/2013 on 2+2=? 0
#15 - I literally just watched that last night 10/01/2013 on (untitled) 0
#5 - Wasn't there a sequel to this that ended with Mulan going &quo… 10/01/2013 on Mulan's self discovery 0
#7 - Actually, that was one of his powers in a different universe. … 10/01/2013 on Spider Power +1
#76 - Feel free to do so if you so choose. It is always good to have…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/01/2013 on 2+2=? 0
#77 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
Ahh...I just believe everyone has their own opinions on morality even if their right or wrong.
#74 - Yes you can, when they have no place to be there. Philosophica…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/01/2013 on 2+2=? 0
User avatar #79 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
Two different sets of arguments. One is about morality itself, the other is about corruption in the government. If you haven't noticed we have been going from the top to the bottom of this thread with this, because the replies are in different places. Because it is two different arguments, though they may overlap a bit. As far as why you would come up with a question to support me...I said you can. Not you would. You don't need to type them out, since I already know they are their in your head. And I still stand, that philosophical questions, such as they are, count. That aside though, I ask you if you know what a theory is? It is an answer to a question in science yes. An answer with an large amount of evidence for it...but is still not proven. Why? Because it can't be proven. Those are the questions we can never know the answer That aside, i am pretty sure you want to end this, So after I respond to your other thing, I will stop responding period. You can have your own response after it, and I will probably find it wanting, since you will probably say I am contradictiing myself or something and then say I said something I didn't actually say. But like I said, it will be the end for me.
User avatar #110 - captainfuckitall (10/02/2013) [-]
Theories can, and have been proven countless times before. Again, just because something has yet to be answered does not mean it lacks an answer, it just means we haven't figured it out yet. There is no such thing as a question without an answer, and I stand by that point.
#75 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
Feel free to do so if you so choose. It is always good to have a second opinion. What is your personal view on morality and where it comes from, Include?
#77 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
Ahh...I just believe everyone has their own opinions on morality even if their right or wrong.
#73 - This conversation is getting far too convoluted to keep track …  [+] (2 new replies) 10/01/2013 on 2+2=? 0
User avatar #80 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
This conversation should have ended awhile ago.

I am worried I would fill up my entire 2,000 words with why your second section is wrong. I have not once contradicted myself. Empathy doesn't change. I never once said people could decide the morality of a govt. A govt. can be either moral or immoral. People can make their own judgements on it. But people can be wrong. People don't judge things based off of morality and NONE have complete empathy. People make decisions, but they do not decide morality.

You have said things that agree with what I say. You just say them differently. You think they are different, but really they aren't.

Morality doesn't change. It is absolute. There is a reason murder and lying were used. Because morality cannot in any way view those as the same. Because they are not the same. It is based off of the situation, but that does not mean the same thing as morality changes. It would be like a computer deciding what is just in our justice system. In two identical situations it will never change what it does, but in two slightly different situations it might. Does the computer then, ever change? No.

You are now asking me to tell you what decisions are based off of. This is not an argument on how people decide what is moral. It is an argument as to what IS moral. Two completely different things.

This is my last response. You can tell me I contradict myself when I don't all you want. But you wanted finality so I am giving it to you. This is my last response.
User avatar #111 - captainfuckitall (10/02/2013) [-]
But then, again, what is the point of morality at all? If people could choose what is moral or immoral, yet morality doesn't change, would that not mean we move along without it? If the entire world simultaneously decided that 4 actually meant 5, would they be wrong? Absolutely not, because the numbers are just representations, things we use as a bridge of meaning, they change as people's meanings change. If people do not judge things based off morality or have complete Empathy, there is no point for them at all, it would be just like a poster in the Arctic that nobody ever comes across. Besides, if they can be wrong, can't you be wrong about the ultimate source of morality as well?

Oh, okay, it's comforting to know that you know my arguments and mind-set better than I do.

But if a murder is caused by a lie, or a lie prevents a life from being saved, they become interchangeable, just like morality. You're right, in two identical situations it would not change the verdict, however, another computer just might disagree.
#67 - I never made assumptions, I said it was "Akin too", …  [+] (8 new replies) 10/01/2013 on 2+2=? 0
User avatar #81 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
This has nothing to do with our debate or argument. Whichever you prefer to call it. But did you know that as an anon they censor the word "assumption"
User avatar #72 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
You cannot take out questions on a debate like this. So philosophical questions do count. As such I think you can come up with them on your own.

Ignoring that, as it is not important to this: You aren't disagreeing with me. Why do you insist on arguing if you aren't going to disagree? I agree that we should keep the governments. Governments are necessary. Are you trying to imply with your statement that I think we should get rid of governments? Because no where have I said anything like that. But that doesn't make governments right. It doesn't make them wrong. But they are always corrupt to some level. The best we can do is limit that corruption. We cannot get rid of it. Instead of ignoring that it is there, let us make sure it is limited as possible.
User avatar #74 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
Yes you can, when they have no place to be there. Philosophical questions do not count, as philosophical beliefs vary from person to person, and thus questions like "What is the meaning of life" has a million different answers, even though it is impossible to accept them all. You cannot include questions where the answers are subjective, otherwise there is no concrete answer at all.

Why would I come up with questions to prove YOUR point? That's not how debating works. You make a claim, you prove it.

Because I don't disagree with everything you say, only some things. I actually thought we had moved on from governments and was onto morality, which explains why I agreed with you regarding the logic concerning governments and not when concerning morality.
User avatar #79 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
Two different sets of arguments. One is about morality itself, the other is about corruption in the government. If you haven't noticed we have been going from the top to the bottom of this thread with this, because the replies are in different places. Because it is two different arguments, though they may overlap a bit. As far as why you would come up with a question to support me...I said you can. Not you would. You don't need to type them out, since I already know they are their in your head. And I still stand, that philosophical questions, such as they are, count. That aside though, I ask you if you know what a theory is? It is an answer to a question in science yes. An answer with an large amount of evidence for it...but is still not proven. Why? Because it can't be proven. Those are the questions we can never know the answer That aside, i am pretty sure you want to end this, So after I respond to your other thing, I will stop responding period. You can have your own response after it, and I will probably find it wanting, since you will probably say I am contradictiing myself or something and then say I said something I didn't actually say. But like I said, it will be the end for me.
User avatar #110 - captainfuckitall (10/02/2013) [-]
Theories can, and have been proven countless times before. Again, just because something has yet to be answered does not mean it lacks an answer, it just means we haven't figured it out yet. There is no such thing as a question without an answer, and I stand by that point.
#75 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
Feel free to do so if you so choose. It is always good to have a second opinion. What is your personal view on morality and where it comes from, Include?
#77 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
Ahh...I just believe everyone has their own opinions on morality even if their right or wrong.
#66 - I literally copied and pasted your words, there is no way I co…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/01/2013 on 2+2=? 0
User avatar #71 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
By the way, no where did I paint you as an ass. I have been strongly pointing out how prone you are to ignoring key parts of an argument....like a politician.
User avatar #70 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
For your first paragraph:

You copied and pasted the entire thing and you still think I am contradicting myself? You are ignoring the NOT A MORAL FACTOR. Because it is not a moral factor, it can be morally right or wrong in what it does. But it is not definitely on either side of the factor. Please stop ignoring the context.

Second Paragraph

YOU JUST AGREED WITH ME in your first sentence. And your second. And I will agree with you on the next part. Empathy doesn't change, but the feelings you are empathizing do. That is why morality depends on the situation. I won't feel the same moral obligation for a lie as I will a murder. Why? Because they are different situations. But for the same situation, morality will not change.

You clearly have disagreed with my stance. But that being said, I expect this part was in response to the you have agreed with me thing. Well, by saying that "Just as well, you might be empathetic toward a struggle, but not like or support it; you might also NOT be empathetic toward something, yet still support or respect it. As such, the explanation still falls short." you are saying that you can make a decision different from your feelings on the subject. This does not mean that morality is not decided by empathy. It means decisions are not decided by empathy. So what I said still stands.

As for your personal attack thing. You cut out a part that wasn't a personal attack.

I took out the real personal attacks and it turns out that 137 words with them, 113 words without. Hardly half. And that doesn't change my points anyway so....
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
This conversation is getting far too convoluted to keep track of. I would suggest we either go back to basics or end it right here, lest we end up hating eachother due to the wrong reasons. But, just so I can prove I'm not 'coping out":

You are contradicting yourself, you can't say Empathy doesn't change and then say people can decide whether the government is moral or not (after-all, if Empathy didn't change, the opinion would remain the same).

Yes, I can agree with you, just like you can agree with me; I don't exactly like the idea of butting heads for the sake of butting heads, so if you say something I agree with, yes, I will say so.

If morality depends on the situation, then it is not absolute, it is situational. But if morality depends on the situations, why wouldn't it change based upon the reason for the lie or murder?

I disagreed about your stance regarding morality, not the government. But if decisions are not decided by Empathy, and thus, Morality, what are they decided by? Or rather, whatever they are decided by, where does morality come into the picture at all?

That would depend on personal opinion, and is thus unreliable as we both have two differing ones.
User avatar #80 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
This conversation should have ended awhile ago.

I am worried I would fill up my entire 2,000 words with why your second section is wrong. I have not once contradicted myself. Empathy doesn't change. I never once said people could decide the morality of a govt. A govt. can be either moral or immoral. People can make their own judgements on it. But people can be wrong. People don't judge things based off of morality and NONE have complete empathy. People make decisions, but they do not decide morality.

You have said things that agree with what I say. You just say them differently. You think they are different, but really they aren't.

Morality doesn't change. It is absolute. There is a reason murder and lying were used. Because morality cannot in any way view those as the same. Because they are not the same. It is based off of the situation, but that does not mean the same thing as morality changes. It would be like a computer deciding what is just in our justice system. In two identical situations it will never change what it does, but in two slightly different situations it might. Does the computer then, ever change? No.

You are now asking me to tell you what decisions are based off of. This is not an argument on how people decide what is moral. It is an argument as to what IS moral. Two completely different things.

This is my last response. You can tell me I contradict myself when I don't all you want. But you wanted finality so I am giving it to you. This is my last response.
User avatar #111 - captainfuckitall (10/02/2013) [-]
But then, again, what is the point of morality at all? If people could choose what is moral or immoral, yet morality doesn't change, would that not mean we move along without it? If the entire world simultaneously decided that 4 actually meant 5, would they be wrong? Absolutely not, because the numbers are just representations, things we use as a bridge of meaning, they change as people's meanings change. If people do not judge things based off morality or have complete Empathy, there is no point for them at all, it would be just like a poster in the Arctic that nobody ever comes across. Besides, if they can be wrong, can't you be wrong about the ultimate source of morality as well?

Oh, okay, it's comforting to know that you know my arguments and mind-set better than I do.

But if a murder is caused by a lie, or a lie prevents a life from being saved, they become interchangeable, just like morality. You're right, in two identical situations it would not change the verdict, however, another computer just might disagree.
#60 - Well that just seems silly; people should know what they want …  [+] (11 new replies) 10/01/2013 on 2+2=? 0
User avatar #65 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
Every government does not equal every leader. You are making assumptions here. Completely unwarranted ones I might add. That personal attack is advice: stop dismissing things just because you disagree. That aside, governments are composed of more than one person. All it takes are a few corrupt people though. You could have a government composed of hundreds or thousands. But 50 corrupt people can do a lot even there. There is no such thing as a government free of corruption. You are not choosing to see the world in a better light, you are choosing to ignore what is there. As for your question v answer one, there are a number of questions which do not have an answer.
User avatar #93 - toastedspikes (10/01/2013) [-]
This is why anarchism as a form of government theoretically should have the lowest form of government, as the government comprises of every individual in a population. In essence it is pure democracy. Is it viable? That's another debate. But as a political ideology it does promise the least amount of corruption.
User avatar #67 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
I never made assumptions, I said it was "Akin too", as you cannot have a governing body without a head. I'm not dismissing anything. True, but there can only be 'one' leader, a President, Prime-Minister, or King. Again, that is not the fault of the government, but the people; there is nothing fundamentally wrong with a governing body, just the mind-set of a few people within it (and the very fact it can only be just a few proves it). You don't uproot a tree just because a few branches are bad, you simply snip them away and hope for the best.

Many questions that do not have an answer? Such as? (Note: Philosophical questions do not count, as personal belief changes from person to person. Just as well, questions currently unanswered to not mean a question HAS no answer)
User avatar #81 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
This has nothing to do with our debate or argument. Whichever you prefer to call it. But did you know that as an anon they censor the word "assumption"
User avatar #72 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
You cannot take out questions on a debate like this. So philosophical questions do count. As such I think you can come up with them on your own.

Ignoring that, as it is not important to this: You aren't disagreeing with me. Why do you insist on arguing if you aren't going to disagree? I agree that we should keep the governments. Governments are necessary. Are you trying to imply with your statement that I think we should get rid of governments? Because no where have I said anything like that. But that doesn't make governments right. It doesn't make them wrong. But they are always corrupt to some level. The best we can do is limit that corruption. We cannot get rid of it. Instead of ignoring that it is there, let us make sure it is limited as possible.
User avatar #74 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
Yes you can, when they have no place to be there. Philosophical questions do not count, as philosophical beliefs vary from person to person, and thus questions like "What is the meaning of life" has a million different answers, even though it is impossible to accept them all. You cannot include questions where the answers are subjective, otherwise there is no concrete answer at all.

Why would I come up with questions to prove YOUR point? That's not how debating works. You make a claim, you prove it.

Because I don't disagree with everything you say, only some things. I actually thought we had moved on from governments and was onto morality, which explains why I agreed with you regarding the logic concerning governments and not when concerning morality.
User avatar #79 - mylazy (10/01/2013) [-]
Two different sets of arguments. One is about morality itself, the other is about corruption in the government. If you haven't noticed we have been going from the top to the bottom of this thread with this, because the replies are in different places. Because it is two different arguments, though they may overlap a bit. As far as why you would come up with a question to support me...I said you can. Not you would. You don't need to type them out, since I already know they are their in your head. And I still stand, that philosophical questions, such as they are, count. That aside though, I ask you if you know what a theory is? It is an answer to a question in science yes. An answer with an large amount of evidence for it...but is still not proven. Why? Because it can't be proven. Those are the questions we can never know the answer That aside, i am pretty sure you want to end this, So after I respond to your other thing, I will stop responding period. You can have your own response after it, and I will probably find it wanting, since you will probably say I am contradictiing myself or something and then say I said something I didn't actually say. But like I said, it will be the end for me.
User avatar #110 - captainfuckitall (10/02/2013) [-]
Theories can, and have been proven countless times before. Again, just because something has yet to be answered does not mean it lacks an answer, it just means we haven't figured it out yet. There is no such thing as a question without an answer, and I stand by that point.
#75 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (10/01/2013) [-]
Feel free to do so if you so choose. It is always good to have a second opinion. What is your personal view on morality and where it comes from, Include?
#77 - include (10/01/2013) [-]
Ahh...I just believe everyone has their own opinions on morality even if their right or wrong.

Comments(489):

[ 489 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
#480 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#479 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#478 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#477 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
#476 - lolollo ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
[ 489 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)