Why didn't you just do it then?

I lack the skill :(

I think its so they have more stuff they can take off if they loose (seems like they're playing strippoker, but i'm not sure.)

Das gai

Are you god of logic?

That comment was so clever that I am saving it forevers.

I plan to live forever, so I'll hold you to that, and if I find out you lied to me I'll be very sad

I want to die at the age of 666. When I'm on my death bed, I'll request that the current pope is there (I plan to be a billionaire by then), I will then make him lean in to hear something i have to say, then as i press a small button under the bed I will whisper "God isn't all it cracked up to be", the button will set off a chain reaction in which wings explode from my back, a gold halo of light floats atop my head, and I'll dive out the window and fly away (In the future i plan on all of this existing. Maybe even my main source of billions.). Then people will realize I'm 666 years old, and I'll create an entire religious shit-storm, and when saint Peter asks me at the pearly gates, "Why dude?" I'll reply with a wave of clarity emanating from my face "Why the fuck not?"

Says Justin Bieber life not valuable = praise, green thumbs

Says emo fag life not valuable = "wtf it's a human life", red thumbs

I wonder if funnyjunk has more jb fans or emos......it's a real mystery....

Eh, most people on this website are adolescent, so there's a good portion that are probably emo

except a human life

There are 7 billion of us on the planet

We can stand to lose a few, I'm sure

true over population is a problem

Big deal

I'm always here for you, bud.

Her Patronus was seen to be skeletal and evil looking.

Well then it's certainly not pure of heart, so that doesn't make sense

Can you just accept that a 7 book long series written over the course of a decade is bound to have some inconsistencies?

It's literally impossible for it to be perfect.

It would be far easier to just say that you need good memories to produce it. I'm giving it the EASY way out, sir :P

What are you talking about? She was in total support of the genocide of all muggles

Stephen King made a comment regarding her that she was the greatest 'non-villain' evil person he had ever read about

But that implies every Death Eater knew what they were doing was evil, while that isn't entirely correct; as there were quite a few Death Eaters who truly thought it was the right thing to do

"Only wizards who are "pure of heart" are able to cast Patronuses. If the Patronus Charm is attempted to be cast by a Dark or otherwise not pure-hearted wizard, who would otherwise be magically capable of casting one, rather than the intended effect of a spirit guardian bursting forth, a horde of maggots will be conjured from the caster's wand, which will attempt to consume the caster. The first recorded instance of this happening is with the Dark Wizard Raczidian."

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Patronus#cite_note--8

And here's some stuff from Rowling herself

http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2007/0730-bloomsbury-chat.html

But wait, wasn't that pink bitch able to cast one?

Her Patronus was seen to be skeletal and evil looking.

Well then it's certainly not pure of heart, so that doesn't make sense

Can you just accept that a 7 book long series written over the course of a decade is bound to have some inconsistencies?

It's literally impossible for it to be perfect.

It would be far easier to just say that you need good memories to produce it. I'm giving it the EASY way out, sir :P

What are you talking about? She was in total support of the genocide of all muggles

Stephen King made a comment regarding her that she was the greatest 'non-villain' evil person he had ever read about

But that implies every Death Eater knew what they were doing was evil, while that isn't entirely correct; as there were quite a few Death Eaters who truly thought it was the right thing to do

holy shit. I hope so. Incredibly depressed? it's a fiction story, bro. It's okay. This is not something that should have such a hard impact on your life. People become incredibly depressed when their mother calls them a mistake right before dying or some shit. Calm down, get some help.

I am so sorry for over exaggerating. Every time I feel like doing it again in the future, I shall just think of your words of wisdom and all shall be well

I'm always here for you, bud.

Not necessarily, the Dementor is drawn to feelings of hope and determination, neither of which is defined as good or evil in any sense. But you may have a point

"Only wizards who are "pure of heart" are able to cast Patronuses. If the Patronus Charm is attempted to be cast by a Dark or otherwise not pure-hearted wizard, who would otherwise be magically capable of casting one, rather than the intended effect of a spirit guardian bursting forth, a horde of maggots will be conjured from the caster's wand, which will attempt to consume the caster. The first recorded instance of this happening is with the Dark Wizard Raczidian."

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Patronus#cite_note--8

And here's some stuff from Rowling herself

http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2007/0730-bloomsbury-chat.html

But wait, wasn't that pink bitch able to cast one?

Her Patronus was seen to be skeletal and evil looking.

Well then it's certainly not pure of heart, so that doesn't make sense

Can you just accept that a 7 book long series written over the course of a decade is bound to have some inconsistencies?

It's literally impossible for it to be perfect.

It would be far easier to just say that you need good memories to produce it. I'm giving it the EASY way out, sir :P

What are you talking about? She was in total support of the genocide of all muggles

Stephen King made a comment regarding her that she was the greatest 'non-villain' evil person he had ever read about

But that implies every Death Eater knew what they were doing was evil, while that isn't entirely correct; as there were quite a few Death Eaters who truly thought it was the right thing to do

Look out guys, we got an edgy fucker over here


He thinks so radically different that my whole perception of reality is brought into question...

SO HARDCORE

I don't know what to find more hilarious, that you're trying so hard to upset me or failing so miserably at it

If you actually read all the books, you would know that it is not a book for children. There a lot of dark moments in the book that I know myself, if I was a parent, would not let my children read/see.

Wait, so are you saying you wouldn't want your children to be in HP's shoes, or are you saying you wouldn't want your children to read Harry Potter in the first place? 'Cause I think you're being way overprotective if the latter, and glaringly obvious if the former. I started reading the series when I was 10. Finished it at 14. I'd be pretty upset and insulted if my parents thought I was too immature to handle Harry Potter.

Well at 10 its fine but I was more referring to around 6-7 years old. That's how old my little sister is so I usually use that age range for little children examples

I hardly expect 7 year olds to be able to read the 400+ pages long stories from book 4 and onwards. If they can, and they can understand the events enough for you to be worried about detecting the 'dark' subject matter, then maybe they're mentally developed enough that they deserve a chance to read it anyways?

I suppose I could agree that having it all read and explained to them might be a bit much, but who'd actually do that?

Well, I also meant watching the movies. They can be a bit graphic

Fair enough.

Sign in and say that like a man.

i lit one out of habit, and it made my lungs feel better.. i was 16, man..not the smartest thing i've ever done...

Im loving this stories man. How old are you now?

25 and a half

how many years of stories do you have? You should write a motherfucking book, I even love those pictures you put and the bottom of the posts. Keep it up bro ;)

That would probably be a pretty popular book...

Memoirs of a McWorker

What is he trying to prove?







That even a god can bleed

"[...] even Superman has failed on some occasions to stop him."

Are you reffering to this? (Injustice: Gods among us)

You should consider that that is the brand new Injustice comic. That literally JUST came out recently, and it's the -first- time Superman has really managed to do ANYTHING effective against the Joker, and heres the kicker......


....The Joker Still Wins! He kills Lois Lane and drives Superman in to becoming a hitlerious Dictator! He STILL manages to break down an unbreakable hero and turn him in to a mad, raving, LUNATIC!

I have no idea, all I remember is that Superman gets awfully frustrated with the Joker because he can't stop his new schemes (and even considers killing him many times) and the Joker just laughs it off like it's nothing

There have also been theories that Joker is not INsane but rather SUPERsane (inb4 super saiyan puns) and is actually so sane that we can't comprehend it and perceive it as insanity.

Madness and cruelty is beyond no man. With the right instigation, anyone can kill.

i think that's what he may be trying to prove

My paint skills have no needs for charts.

Maybe.. the joker is gay, and in love with Batman. Then only doing this to get Batman..

actually the reason why joker seems to go from "psychotic clown prince of crime" to a pathetic crook is because he redefines his personality each and every day.and while he does know how to fight he is nowhere near batmans level(in most incarnations)

and yes he does enjoy fighting agaitns bats.and in the earth 2(if im correct) continuity he went even more nuts when he heared batman had died of old age and only stopped when the new batman managed to convince him that he is actually the old bats.


also even though joker takes down jl members with ease its usually in elsewhere comics(non canon) or just extremely big plot shielding.

Quite a valid point, Captain Fuckitall.

The thing is, he is trying to break him in order to prove to everyone that even the most uncanny hero that has the strongest will for justice can be broken.
It's a fact the Joker points out in many comics, movies and shows that he is trying to break Batman as an example.
He is trying to cause despair so that people lose faith in heroes and cause everyone to be against them.
A bit like the episode in Justice League where the Justice Tower goes full orbital

Guuuuhhhhhhhh

That actually makes a lot of seeennnsseeeee

That last part was actually the Joker's entire plan in The Dark Knight film. What he's trying to prove is that everyone can be corrupted, even the heroes.

A few things I'd like to tack on.


First off, officially The Joker practices what is known as Irish Boxing, which involves using verbal deception (COME ON BATSY, WHATS THE MATTER? WORRIED ABOUT BOY-BLUNDER AND THE BOMB OVER THERE?) and traditional gallic bare-knuckle boxing styles in order to disorient and diffuse.

Secondly, what the Joker would be trying to "prove" is that nothing is definite. That's what it really all boils down to. Batman is something that is resolute, and concrete. Unchanging and constant testament to Order.

The Joker is the exact opposite, always changing his strategies, always trying to devise a new way of thinking, never feeling or thinking or doing the same thing more than twice in one sitting. He's representative of all that is chaos and corruption, and it is his duty as an Agent of Chaos to prove that Batman is subject to corruption, and change, it's about proving that Batman really is just as weak and flawed as the rest of us, that he can be broken and forced in to realms beyond what he's ever sworn he'd enter.

And for those who haven't read the comics, but have seen the recent movies can refer to the scene where Batman is driving his motorcycle towards the Joker. The Joker shoots at him at says something like "Come on... Do it, I want you to do it" (referring to Batman running him over). Batmans turns the wheel in the very last second, not killing the Joker.