x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9327
Comment Ranking:#919
Highest Content Rank:#9336
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 58465 total,  71661 ,  13196
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 92.9% (929/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10872
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16727
FJ Points:25161

latest user's comments

#91 - Oh no sir, it was my mistake, I should have been more precise.… 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +2
#87 - But exceptions are made, as shown. And I'm not talkin…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
User avatar #89 - Endofzeeworld (04/18/2014) [-]
I was under the impression we were talking about rape here. I see however, that your question was asked in a more general way. My mistake.
User avatar #91 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Oh no sir, it was my mistake, I should have been more precise.

The point I'm trying to make is that women give signals, that's part of flirting. They're generally coy, generally play hard to get, generally mischievous. All of these things are seen as part of flirting by men, and these things are even APPROVED by other women. Surely this is a sign of consent (as consent is not just verbal), and even now we can see a post near front-page that details the stories of 21 men and how they became single, and nearly all of them were because the women wanted sex, were ambiguous about it, and he didn't get the message. But if they did, would they be branded as a rapist?

Indeed, it is the initiators responsibility to ask for consent, ALWAYS. However, it is the responsibility of the receiver to give a clear answer as to what they want. If the message they send is just that, ambiguous and subtle, is it really at the fault of the man for mistaking it when she could have just said 'no'? (ESPECIALLY if she went along with his advances instead of correcting them?)

That's all I'm saying. Much like with kids looking both ways before they cross the street. They shouldn't HAVE to worry about being hit by cars, but until we live in a perfect world, they need to know what they're getting into and if they can't handle it, can't look both ways, or stammer right in the middle of the road, they should just stay home
#84 - Now that you say it, it is a good idea. It would really help n…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
#92 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
Hell ye captainfuckitall for president!
#65 - Well it usually isn't. I'm sure you yourself have seen many p…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
User avatar #76 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
I had this same discussion a while ago. A woman was calling this boy a full-on rapist because he had sex with a girl at a party even though the girl admitted not having in any way made obvious she wasn't interested (she even was interested, just not THAT interested). So I tried to explain to her that even though the girl is still raped the boy is not a rapist. The boy wasn't hiding in the bushes waiting for a girl to come by to rape. But to her there was absolutely no difference between the boy and a man who commits rape with malice aforethought (I googled it). Maybe that's a good idea if it's not already existent. First-degree rape, second-degree rape and stuff.
User avatar #84 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Now that you say it, it is a good idea. It would really help narrow down exactly what defines as rape, and what levels of 'rape' are worse than another (as we can all agree that having a brutal rape in an alleyway is much worse than being drunk and taken advantage of at a party. At least from a sensible point of view).
#92 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
Hell ye captainfuckitall for president!
#62 - I know, it was just an example in regards to where the line of…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
User avatar #63 - fjlee (04/18/2014) [-]
thats true, i hadnt thought about it that way. even though its very much implied in those scenarios its not actually ever stated.
User avatar #65 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Well it usually isn't. I'm sure you yourself have seen many posts about how men are so oblivious to a woman's signals, and now I have to have the fear that misinterpreting them will slam me with a rape charge.

He's right though, and he's always been right, it's the responsibility of the initiator to gain consent (and keep in mind, consent can be given in many different ways. Not just verbally). But the point I was trying to make was that if that IS their responsibility, it is the responsibility of the recipient to give a clear answer as to what they want and not give the wrong signals; and if they don't, the initiator cannot be at fault for misinterpreting them (in either case, whether abandoning the chase of carrying it through) in the same sense that a person who does not know of a law should not be punished for breaking it. At most, they should just get a slap on the wrist.

I mean, really, how would you feel if you hooked up with a gorgeous woman at a party and had a great night, only to find you had a rape charge against you later. You are taken from your job, fired (nobody wants a potential rapist on their payroll, and even if you are cleared, it is still always on record that you WERE accused), have it published in the paper that you were accused of rape, and dragged to court to be put on the stand, only to have her say "Well, I only went along with it because I felt obligated to, so you raped me"
User avatar #76 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
I had this same discussion a while ago. A woman was calling this boy a full-on rapist because he had sex with a girl at a party even though the girl admitted not having in any way made obvious she wasn't interested (she even was interested, just not THAT interested). So I tried to explain to her that even though the girl is still raped the boy is not a rapist. The boy wasn't hiding in the bushes waiting for a girl to come by to rape. But to her there was absolutely no difference between the boy and a man who commits rape with malice aforethought (I googled it). Maybe that's a good idea if it's not already existent. First-degree rape, second-degree rape and stuff.
User avatar #84 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Now that you say it, it is a good idea. It would really help narrow down exactly what defines as rape, and what levels of 'rape' are worse than another (as we can all agree that having a brutal rape in an alleyway is much worse than being drunk and taken advantage of at a party. At least from a sensible point of view).
#92 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
Hell ye captainfuckitall for president!
#57 - Eh, it happens. I wish I had yours. I even asked to be invited… 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +2
#54 - "I've known many Feminists" I have personal…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
#55 - lolibear (04/18/2014) [-]
Then I suppose my experience has been different than yours.
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Eh, it happens. I wish I had yours. I even asked to be invited to one of their rallies, as I don't like the idea of judging something until I know more about it, but the fact I was denied gave me more than enough of an idea of how it is.
#53 - (Continued) Just as well, men can also go to jail due… 04/18/2014 on Take a stand 0
#51 - Then why is it so that a woman can consent to sex and then tak… 04/18/2014 on Take a stand 0
#46 - I disagree, I've known many women who claim to be Feminists wh…  [+] (7 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
#80 - kmichel (04/18/2014) [-]
I think that feminists in the US are more radical on average than in other countries.
#50 - lolibear (04/18/2014) [-]
Do you really think the majority is like that? The internet is not a true example of "most feminists"
#132 - anonymous (04/18/2014) [-]
Actually it is. Its just that most feminists wouldn't say what they say on the internet offline.
#61 - anonymous (04/18/2014) [-]
The internet is actually a true example of feminist. It's sexist of you to think otherwise. The real problem is that the internet is a mask. Nobody holds back behind a mask.
User avatar #54 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
"I've known many Feminists"

I have personally have friendships with.

I have had acquaintances with beyond my room walls.

I have fraternized with them out of the comfort of my home.

You seem to have missed that part.

In any case, yes I do, because, again, I have PERSONALLY (in real life, in case you miss that again) known more irrational and misandrist feminists than rational and passive ones.
#55 - lolibear (04/18/2014) [-]
Then I suppose my experience has been different than yours.
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Eh, it happens. I wish I had yours. I even asked to be invited to one of their rallies, as I don't like the idea of judging something until I know more about it, but the fact I was denied gave me more than enough of an idea of how it is.
#45 - I'd like to see a report of that, please. That police cannot u…  [+] (16 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#106 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Simple explanation, first the guy in your story probably didn't know the law and had a public pretender to represent him. Public Defenders are paid on a case by case basis. Where I live they are paid 750$ every time they close a case. Hence, they love to plead it out and try to pressure most of their clients into pleading out the case.

As I stated, I was arrested and beat it because the only evidence was my drunken confession. I know the law and didn't let my public pretender dupe me into taking the plea.



And yes, I'm totally going to post documentation with my name and other such information on the internet. That sounds like a wonderful idea!
User avatar #110 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Documentation isn't required. Just any type of evidence saying that police cannot hold a statement gained under intoxication as valid.
#112 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Ok, I'll get on that when I can be bothered.

Or you could google it yourself.

It might be a state thing, I'm not sure if it's federal or state law.
User avatar #117 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
I could. But it's not my job to provide evidence for YOUR statements. That's YOUR job.

I've already provided mine to another user on this page. Feel free to look for it, you can't miss it.
#119 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Meh, I have my own personal experience, which I provided. If that isn't enough for you then I can't be fucked to make more of an effort.
User avatar #121 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
And I have mine, which I provided. If that isn't enough for you, then I can't be fucked to make more of an effort.

Oh my

Look at that

We've seemed to have found ourselves in the same boat. And your word has just as much value as mine.
#123 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Cool. As I stated I'm not sure if it was a state law, which it could be, which would explain the person you mentioned.

Also the fact that he probably had a public pretender and didn't know the law would as well.

Oh well. Have fun thinking you're always right.
User avatar #126 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
It's funny, isn't it? You probably have the most snide and egotistical attitude out of anyone here in the comments, INCLUDING ME! Which really is saying something as I am quite the prick.

Yet, the difference between you and me is that I actually bring up evidence to support what I say, while you just throw a tantrum and say "Nu-uh! If you don't wanna believe me, tough shit!"

Oh yes, believe me, I KNOW I'm right.
#128 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Lol, throw a tantrum? Have I insulted you? Did I get all butthurt that you don't believe me? No, I just said I can't be fucked to try to find the link again, or look up that study.

I never said you must believe me, merely that the facts are out there if you care to do the research.

You know, for claiming to be rational, you aren't acting very rational.

And have fun "knowing" *thinking* you are right.
User avatar #130 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Throwing a tantrum doesn't have to do with insulting, you just seemed to have gotten rather offended when I asked for evidence to your claims. It's not an unreasonable request, and yet you cannot provide while insisting I should believe you anyways.

If you can't be bothered to prove what you say, then don't say anything. You just make you and your argument look bad, not to mention the people you're trying to support.

I am acting very rational. You provided an argument, I provided a rebuttle, you provided a rebuttle based upon evidence you're privy to, I asked to see said evidence, and you refuse to bother to look for it. I wouldn't say I'm the one being irrational at all.

Until you provide evidence, I AM right. My very argument was that you cannot use unreported claims in your logic, while you insist that you can because it is based on objective reasoning. Until you provide an example, a statistic that SHOWS that objective reasoning, I am right, and you are wrong. You can't just walk into a debate and make a claim without evidence, that's not how it works.
#135 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Also, redthumbing all of my comments just because I disagree with you is pretty butthurt behavior. Which doesn't make you right at all.

But I forgot, you're always right. Because your mommy says so. Because you're her "special" little baby.
#134 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Did I insist? No, I stated the facts and told you it was up to you to research it if you really cared that much, while stating that I myself did not care that much.

And I have shown statistics, you have simply ignored them because you don't want to believe.

Its alright captain. You're always right. Just like your mommy told you.
User avatar #137 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Except it's not up to me. YOU stated there was evidence, YOU must provide it. It is not my job to go out and find your information for you, that is not how a debate works. You do not care because you know you will not find it, because you know you're wrong. It's that simple. Nobody else would go to such an extent of carrying on the conversation unless they were desperately trying to hide that fact.

What statistics? You mean the ones you had absolutely no references for?

Not always right, just when I actually know my arguments and am able to back them up.

Just as well, you've red-thumbed my comments too, so now you not only prove to be a sore loser, but also a hypocrite.
#139 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
I only started thumbing you down after you did that to me. Turn about being fair play and all.

Also, you've done the exact same thing and told me the same thing (before I refused to spend the time looking up the source, which by the way I did give, just not a link to it; the FBI study on rape).

Nice strawman tactics dude.

Oh, and notice how (in the other chain of comments) I stated you'd find either a girl OR a guy, yet you fixated on the guy part? Hmmm, I bet your closet is fabulous, sense you seem to be hiding pretty deep in it.




the only reason I've kept this going is you keep making me laugh, but of course that means your winning, doesn't it?
User avatar #141 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You and I both know that's not true. Other's thumbed you down, but it was not me. Believe it or not, other people can believe you are incorrect as well.

But again, that's just your WORDS. throwing around the word "F.B.I" doesn't make it any more credible than if I did it for the exact opposite argument. You need to provide sources and references, otherwise you HAVE no proof.

That's not a straw-man tactic, actually. Straw-man would be making the statement that I have beaten your argument by 'winning' over an entirely different proposition. But I didn't win over a proposition. We debated, you made claims, I asked for proof, you failed to provide and began insulting me. It's not as if any of this is false, and all points to you not having an argument in the first-place. And if the roles were reversed, you would be saying the exact same thing.

I'm not fixated on anything. YOU brought mud-slinging into it because you have no other arguments to give.

I am winning, yes. Because I'm remaining calm and continuing to ask for evidence for your claims and you are constantly failing to provide. And I certainly do hope I am giving you a laugh, it would be too bad if you got nothing out of being proven wrong.
#143 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Really? So when I click on the little question mark that tells me who voted me down... and all of them say you (and no one else), I guess thats just wrong. Because you are always right and all. After all your mommy said you're never wrong. And you are her special little boy!

And not fixated? I made a sexuality neutral statement, including both male and female as your partner of choice, and you fixated on the male. Didn't notice the female, just the male. I didn't even state anything about you being the catcher for the male, or the female using a strap-on, merely that one day you might find a sexual partner (of either gender) who was tight enough that you could actually enjoy sex with them, you having a one inch dick and all.

Hmmm, yep, totally not fixating right there. Not at all. After all it's not like you ignored part of the statement and fixated on one part. Nope. Never happened.

And yes, it is just my word. My words about a study I read, that has been cited by many others in multiple forms of media. Just like your word about the links you refuse to post for me. See how that logic works back against you?

And yes, taking what I say and trying to twist it (doing a piss poor job of it too) is a strawman tactic.

When I state statistics about unreported rapes, then state how the FBI came to those numbers, and you try to say I "said that unreported claims counts as evidence", when all I ever did was cite a study about the rates of false claims and unreported claims, well, how is that not a strawman tactic?

Because obviously, citing statistics about unreported rapes means that unreported claims count as evidence. After all I can not report that you stole 20 bucks from me and still take you to court over it.

Seriously dude, I'm starting to feel bad for making fun of you. Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
#43 - Didn't you just say in another comment that it was 70% of all …  [+] (15 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#107 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
No, I said 30% went unreported, while 70% were reported. Try reading.

And it is based off of rates of criminals snitching to get a better deal or copping out to another offense to get a better deal. The rates are estimated, but I give the FBI credit.
User avatar #114 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
My mistake. Doesn't change the fact that it's still baseless.

Is that right? All of them, eh? So if those rates are standard, you could provide evidence for that as well, couldn't you? Especially if it's part of the F.B.I database.
#116 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
It's been a while sense I read the study, so things might have changed, how ever I gave a ballpark of what I remember. I might be off a little bit, but I have decent memory.

And like I said, I give the FBI credit for being an unbiased group with the best chance of nailing those numbers down.
User avatar #120 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Good for you. If you have a decent memory you can provide the reference of where you found it, can't you?

We've already established that criminals are untrustworthy and will say anything to save their own skin, and trusting someone based upon their word rather than evidence is always a silly thing to do. If you could be a peach and point me in the direction of "Unreporting rapes that are documented due to objective evidence rather than words", it would be grand.
#125 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
The rape would be considered "unreported" because the victim did not report it.

Also, another comment already covered your comment about criminals lying.
User avatar #127 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Well the very definition of 'unreported' would mean that it is, in fact, NOT reported and thus does not appear on any form of paper. When it does, it is THEN reported. That's how it works.

Indeed, but objective evidence does not lie, which is why I specifically asked for that and you have failed to provide. I can see now why you insist on people taking your word on things when you believe the words of everyone else outright. Except the people who disagree with you, of course.
#129 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
lol, it's funny how butt hurt you get, but accuse me of throwing a tantrum when you wont take my word.

seriously, I've been laughing my ass off this whole time. Tell me, are you always this angry, or is it just because you have a small dick?
User avatar #131 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
How am I butthurt? I'm stating the argument as it goes. If that qualifies as 'butthurt' to you, I can understand why you refuse to provide anything.

Good for you. No, I am very calm despite your insults to my penis size. Wanna know why? Because I know it's a defensive mechanism because you know I'm right. And that's why you'll keep replying to me and continuing to insult me, because THAT'S worth your time, while providing evidence (that doesn't exist) for your argument is apparently...not.
#133 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Oh, so because I can waste thirty seconds on a reply, and an insult that makes me laugh, I must be throwing a tantrum.

You have shown obvious anger.

And nope, you aren't right, but its alright. You and your small dick will one day find a girl with a tight enough pussy for you to actually cum. Or if you are into guys, a guy with a tight enough asshole.
User avatar #136 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
For someone throwing homosexual accusations, you seem to be really fixated on my penis.

In any case, you're only proving my point by continuing to throw a tantrum instead of providing the evidence that could so easily be given. You are obviously wrong, everyone can see it, and your mud-slinging only makes you seem like a sore loser.
#138 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
lmao, throwing a tantrum. You showed anger first, demanded to show facts (how about you toss a link or two my way, oh wait, I'm supposed to look it up too, nice how you get to get away with saying that, but I don't), yet I'm the one throwing a tantrum.

Seriously dude, you are hilarious. Do you have many friends in that wonderful world of make believe you live in?
User avatar #140 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
You honestly believe me asking for your references is 'showing anger'?

1. I did post links here. They're elsewhere in the comments section. You could literally find them by clicking 'back to comments' and scrolling a little.
2. Even if I didn't, I didn't make any claims other than we should believe the evidence. YOU said that unreported claims counts as evidence and said you had objective references that prove this, and then failed to provide them. YOU are at fault. He who makes the claim must provide proof for it, that's how it works.

Thank you, I do try. Yes I do, and in the world of make-belief too, thank you for asking.
#142 - tomthehippie (04/19/2014) [-]
Wait wait wait...

I cite an FBI study that reported the following (keep in mind, although I've said this before, these are approximate figures), only 70% of rapes are reported, with approximately 50% of reported rapes making it to trial, and less than half of those charges that do make it to trial resulting in convictions, many of lesser included charges (not sure the figure on this one) such as sexual assault, of reported rapes, only 8% are believed by law enforcement to be false, the vast majority of which are caught by investigating detectives.

Where in the above statements did I say that "unreported claims counts as evidence"? No, I NEVER stated that. I stated that there is a large number of rapes that go unreported, and that the FBI came to this figure through criminals either copping to an old crime they committed to get leniency, or ratting out another criminal, or women (and men) coming forward during a serial rapist/sexual murderer and extrapolating these statistics.

And no, you asking for references (when I tell you that you can use google just as easily as I can), but then expecting me to look up yours are completely different.

You showed anger because you repeatedly claim I am insisting on you taking what I say as fact (when I have simply stated what I know and left it at that), get butt hurt because I'm not following perfect debate rules with someone using completely obvious strawman tactics, and then claim (repeatedly) I'm throwing a tantrum when I simply state that I can't be bothered to look up the study that has been cited in news reports, blogs, ect, yet cry when I mention that you never showed me your supposed links that debunk what I am saying.

Keep it coming cap. You are hilarious!
User avatar #144 - captainfuckitall (04/19/2014) [-]
Mhmm. You didn't 'cite' anything, though; you just claimed it was there, just like you're doing now. You have no links, no references, no reports, no assessments, no ANYTHING to prove that what you're saying is correct.

Well not in the above statements, but in other comments. You consistently brought up "Only X amount of claims are reported", obviously alleging to your argument that false rape claims are drastically lower than even the rapes that go unreported. You said it in order to help your argument, otherwise you wouldn't have said it, and I asked for proof of your findings that you failed to provide. Simple.

I can use google, but I don't know where to look while you have a vague idea. And again, even if I did have a better idea of it than you, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR ARGUMENT, IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERSON YOU ARE DEBATING WITH TO PROVIDE YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU. It's not rocket science. And the difference between your words and my actual links is that you can literally see them by backing out of these strings of comments, while I would have to run through pages and pages of google just to MAYBE find what you're looking for (as they don't exist, as proven by your repeated dodging of providing them).

You are. You're saying "Believe me or shove off", as if you had already won the argument. You know, but I bet if a religious person told you "No, well my god is the true god and you will burn forever if you don't worship him. Because I just know", you wouldn't find that too pleasant. I'm not using strawman tactics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Those are strawman tactics.

So you can't bother to look them up but you can bother to waste time? You must have a very boring day. My boring day has just ended though, so I'll be off. Have fun stroking yourself to your supposed winnings. I look forward to kicking your ass in another debate some time.
#149 - tomthehippie (04/20/2014) [-]
Where did you post your link? Not to me.

And google "FBI Rape Study", or "FBI rape statistics", seems simple enough, but apparantly that requires too much intellect for you.

Yeah, I'm saying this is what I know. I never once stated you had to believe the truth (after all, I am assuming you are an adult and can decide for yourself how you want to delude yourself).

And way to throw a tantrum there buddy! You know, for claiming that I am the one throwing a tantrum, you've done a pretty good job of throwing one yourself.

Strawman tactics; you refuse to post a link to your sources, yet claim that me being lazy and not looking up a link for you means I've lost (there's one), you claim I'm being emotional (throwing a tantrum) when I have done no such thing, repeatedly claiming this as though it makes you right (there's two), you redthumb me for disagreeing with you (there's three).

There's three strawman tactics I've spotted while drunk, and extremely tired.

You are fucking hilarious dude. Keep it up neckbeard! Maybe one day you can impress a girl with how many internet debates you've won! ;D
#42 - Well for the F.B.I to get statistics, the rapes would need to …  [+] (4 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#108 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Criminals often snitch on each other, or will be facing heavy charges and cop to something else to dodge the heavy charge.

Studying the statistics from these events as well as women (and men) who came forward after the fact for serial rapists (and serial murders who escalated, ect) is how the FBI compiled these statistics.
User avatar #115 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Criminals also lie, and if all they have is the word of a scumbag to go on, they must be pretty desperate. In any case, that would still count as a reported rape, wouldn't it? Considering it was brought to light one way or another.

And again, all we have is their word to go on. Do you truly think that's wise to trust someone who has a lot to gain, especially if they have a vendetta, by lying? You yourself have said criminals could get a better bargain in exchange for copping out others, and it wouldn't surprise me a bit if they lied and the cops just went with it because they wanted to put criminals behind bars.
#122 - tomthehippie (04/18/2014) [-]
Its closer and matches other data. Yet again, I think the FBI would have a better handle on this than either of us would.

And yes, criminals lie, but are you going to take becoming a sex criminal if you didn't do it?

Plus, even if they snitch, it still has to result in a conviction, or they wont get a better deal.
User avatar #124 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
I'm sure they would. I'm also sure they're rather indiscriminate of WHY they put people away, and are just glad that they do.

No, but it would add to false statistics, which is what we're discussing.

And it's still just the word of a criminal v.s. the word of another, considering there's very little other evidence to go on if nobody else came forward. Rape in general is a very terrible crime, and even most false accusations that have very little evidence often have the person going to jail simply because the jury is swayed by the horrible story.
#41 - But how do you know that? If rapes go unreported, how exactly … 04/18/2014 on Take a stand -1
#38 - Also! I would like to propose to you a philosophical question.…  [+] (11 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +1
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
But exceptions are made, as shown.

And I'm not talking about things like murder, where you chop someone's head off and expect to get away with it. I mean things like not knowing the speed-limit of a certain road you're on (which I've heard people get away with before), walking on private property (also which I've heard before), or things like lighting (camp) fires, driving unauthorized vehicles, or even sitting in the rear of an open truck while it drives. Nearly all police I've met will excuse such crimes if you are in rush, if there's few other people, or if they're just in the mood to let you go, so I don't think it would be any problem for them if you didn't happen to know it was illegal.
User avatar #89 - Endofzeeworld (04/18/2014) [-]
I was under the impression we were talking about rape here. I see however, that your question was asked in a more general way. My mistake.
User avatar #91 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Oh no sir, it was my mistake, I should have been more precise.

The point I'm trying to make is that women give signals, that's part of flirting. They're generally coy, generally play hard to get, generally mischievous. All of these things are seen as part of flirting by men, and these things are even APPROVED by other women. Surely this is a sign of consent (as consent is not just verbal), and even now we can see a post near front-page that details the stories of 21 men and how they became single, and nearly all of them were because the women wanted sex, were ambiguous about it, and he didn't get the message. But if they did, would they be branded as a rapist?

Indeed, it is the initiators responsibility to ask for consent, ALWAYS. However, it is the responsibility of the receiver to give a clear answer as to what they want. If the message they send is just that, ambiguous and subtle, is it really at the fault of the man for mistaking it when she could have just said 'no'? (ESPECIALLY if she went along with his advances instead of correcting them?)

That's all I'm saying. Much like with kids looking both ways before they cross the street. They shouldn't HAVE to worry about being hit by cars, but until we live in a perfect world, they need to know what they're getting into and if they can't handle it, can't look both ways, or stammer right in the middle of the road, they should just stay home
#60 - fjlee (04/18/2014) [-]
breaking a rule isnt the reasoning behind the vast majority of people who dont rape anyone. Even if it is a legal gray area there is no ethical question as to whether or not it is wrong. for example the reason i have never raped someone isn't because i fear reprisal from a government entity, its because i know that its wrong and being the person i am i wouldn't do it. it isn't an arbitrary rule where this kind of philosophical question can be applied
User avatar #62 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
I know, it was just an example in regards to where the line of 'consent' is drawn and what it actually means.

The argument I was trying to make is that if a woman does not tell a man outright "No", then it is not his fault if he takes an ambiguous action to be consent (provided it's not a forceful rape that you'd find in an alley-way. I mean a man flirting with a woman at a bar or a party), especially if she goes along with it and doesn't correct it. I do believe there's a post near the front page now where 21 men were broken up with, and the reason they were is explained in a little story, and nearly all of them simply involve NOT going for it even when the woman didn't consent, because she was trying to be coy.

Of course raping someone is wrong, and there is no question about it.
User avatar #63 - fjlee (04/18/2014) [-]
thats true, i hadnt thought about it that way. even though its very much implied in those scenarios its not actually ever stated.
User avatar #65 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Well it usually isn't. I'm sure you yourself have seen many posts about how men are so oblivious to a woman's signals, and now I have to have the fear that misinterpreting them will slam me with a rape charge.

He's right though, and he's always been right, it's the responsibility of the initiator to gain consent (and keep in mind, consent can be given in many different ways. Not just verbally). But the point I was trying to make was that if that IS their responsibility, it is the responsibility of the recipient to give a clear answer as to what they want and not give the wrong signals; and if they don't, the initiator cannot be at fault for misinterpreting them (in either case, whether abandoning the chase of carrying it through) in the same sense that a person who does not know of a law should not be punished for breaking it. At most, they should just get a slap on the wrist.

I mean, really, how would you feel if you hooked up with a gorgeous woman at a party and had a great night, only to find you had a rape charge against you later. You are taken from your job, fired (nobody wants a potential rapist on their payroll, and even if you are cleared, it is still always on record that you WERE accused), have it published in the paper that you were accused of rape, and dragged to court to be put on the stand, only to have her say "Well, I only went along with it because I felt obligated to, so you raped me"
User avatar #76 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
I had this same discussion a while ago. A woman was calling this boy a full-on rapist because he had sex with a girl at a party even though the girl admitted not having in any way made obvious she wasn't interested (she even was interested, just not THAT interested). So I tried to explain to her that even though the girl is still raped the boy is not a rapist. The boy wasn't hiding in the bushes waiting for a girl to come by to rape. But to her there was absolutely no difference between the boy and a man who commits rape with malice aforethought (I googled it). Maybe that's a good idea if it's not already existent. First-degree rape, second-degree rape and stuff.
User avatar #84 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Now that you say it, it is a good idea. It would really help narrow down exactly what defines as rape, and what levels of 'rape' are worse than another (as we can all agree that having a brutal rape in an alleyway is much worse than being drunk and taken advantage of at a party. At least from a sensible point of view).
#92 - skaffanl (04/18/2014) [-]
Hell ye captainfuckitall for president!
#30 - (Continued) But, ya see, many men DO know what consen…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +3
#86 - BloodAwaits (04/18/2014) [-]
Stop, stop, stop! STOP USING ALL YOUR LOGIC.
#29 - But if 'no' comes in different forms, doesn't consent do the s…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +6
User avatar #47 - goodcheese (04/18/2014) [-]
if she initiates it and doesn't ask then she risks raping you yes. Again the only way KNOW that someone wants sex is to ask. people have consensual sex all the time where nobody asked consent but that's a risk that the person initiating sex takes. The only way to know for sure.

and yes we should encourage being safe always. but lets say i get hit by a drunk driver and i'm not wearing a seat belt and i get very badly injured, i could've been safer but it never stopped the drunk driver.

and yes most rape and sexual assault curriculums emphasize communication on both parts but again if someone is initiating sex it is there responsibility to ask

if i'm offering food you can take it. if i'm not you have to ask. you wouldn't try and take it without asking and just hope i don't say no. and in regards to your other comment, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, everyone knows that. which emphasizes the importance of education.

and we can have a statistics battle, yes 2-8% is a lot but 92-98% is a whole lot more. not to mention there is a difference between falsely reported rape and false accusations. the majority of that 2-8% statistic means a woman made up an attack against an unspecified aggressor which harms nobody but the woman's credibility. it's very rare for a woman to actually name an individual as someone who raped her. and the 60% of unreported cases are pretty shocking. and many comments suggest that one deserves rape such as "what was she wearing" "what did she expect" etc. these create a culture where we focus on women and how they can prevent someone from raping them and taking the focus off of people who actually commit rape.

the teach men not to rape is not meant to assume all men are rapists but to bring attention to the fact that there are quite a lot of men who do rape. 1 in 6 women and 1 in 33 men are victims of a rape or sexual assault in their lifetime so it does happen a lot. we need to educate people on what consent means.
User avatar #58 - hargleblarg (04/18/2014) [-]
I'd just like to chip-in on this little debate with something.

Throughout this whole thing it's implied that only men rape. Yes, it's mostly men who are rapists, but there are plenty of women rapists too. Why not teach women not to rape?
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
(Continued)

Just as well, men can also go to jail due to false rape accusations, and many men have. Considering the very flimsy definitions of rape, what counts as rape, and the general lack of evidence that is often associated with rape (as it generally happens in private areas and the woman can always refuse to give D.N.A. tests). I mean, people have gone to prison over rape claims 40 years after the rapes occurred (that's not to say the claims were false, it just means the amount of evidence required is not substantial, as it's common knowledge that the law and jury's nearly always favour the woman over the man).

Didn't you say earlier that it was often someone close to the woman who rapes her?

Another person before you first claimed that 30% of rapes go unreported, then he claimed 70%, now you're claiming 60%. Do you see what I mean when I say it is unreliable and should not be included?

I would like to see those comments made 'often, please; as I have only ever found a few out of a hundred that actually support the rapist over the woman and they tend to be down-voted into oblivion (provided they're not trolls, of course...). There IS no rape culture because that doesn't happen, I have only ever heard of "what were you wearing at the time" in a rape case on a fictional TV show. Nobody blames the victim; at most, people DO say "well what do you expect", when she puts herself into a bad situation and then gets raped. Again, that's not to say they're BLAMING her, they're saying she could have been smarter, which is true.

I would like to see those statistics of yours, as they seem extraordinarily high, and there is absolutely no way they would be true WITHOUT literally thousands of well-documented and cited reports to back them up. I mean, good lords, I've known hundreds if not thousands of women throughout my life and can count on one hand how many have been raped, and that's me taking their word for it.

No, what we need to do is nail down what "Rape" is.
User avatar #51 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Then why is it so that a woman can consent to sex and then take it back later and the man can still be tried for rape? Are there some cases where yes doesn't actually mean yes? Should these people really be treated as adults?

That's true, but people would still call you an idiot for not wearing a seat-belt. Again, nobody would blame you, but they WOULD be right in saying you could have prepared yourself better.

But again, should it not then be the other person's responsibility to give a clear and concise answer? I mean, if I asked if I could have some food and you said "Hmm, well, I'm not sure, maybe, I'm okay with you having some now, but might not be okay with it later", that would just be retarded. So if you go to another country and accidentally break the law, or do something negative by cultural standards, you should receive full punishment/be ostracized? Because the majority of England, who lets its immigrants get away with crimes all the time due to cultural differences, would disagree with you. Education is important, but again, you cannot go out of your way to learn something you do not know exists, nor can you be taught something by a teacher who doesn't know it exists. If all men must take a class to know "How not to rape", all women should take one on "How to say no".

8-12%, actually. You're still right, though; 88-92% still is much higher, and I'm not making excuses for rapists or saying victims should be marginalized. I'm saying rape accusations happen. We also cannot bring up the amount of rapes unreported, as by the very nature of them going unreported, you CAN'T report them. All we CAN report is the amount of rape claims that are false. And it does harm people, actually; plenty of people have had their lives ruined because of false-rape accusations, because even HAVING an accusation thrown against you can be the difference between getting that high paying job or being fired, because why would anyone want a potential rapist on their payroll?
#9 - The difference is that's not state-sanctioned. "Oppressio… 04/18/2014 on post on tumblr enjoy... 0
#14 - I have. I can't even tell you know many people I know that com… 04/18/2014 on We all know that 1 person... +2
#22 - Just one comment is enough, dude. You don't need four. 04/18/2014 on Take a stand 0
#20 - "A lot of people don't understand what 'consent' is"…  [+] (8 new replies) 04/18/2014 on Take a stand +10
User avatar #27 - goodcheese (04/18/2014) [-]
the responsibility is on the person initiating sex to get consent. if somebody wants sex then it's their job to make sure the other person is comfortable with it. someone may not feel comfortable saying no. they might fear physical retribution they might not even realize they are allowed to say no. but again why are we focusing on blaming survivors for what they should've done when we could tell people that yes only gives consent under free will and to not assume that someone is okay with having sex if they haven't said yes. what's wrong with educating men on consent? why would you have sex with someone who wasn't okay with it? who cares why they didn't consent, if you don't want to force them then it's simple enough to ask. rapists are very rarely strangers in a dark alley who attack people. it's much more often that the survivor knows the person who attacked them. and it's not saying all men are rapists it's saying that many men do not know what consent is and when they do survey's they've found that many men agree with statements that describe situations where it's okay to rape someone if the statement doesn't explicitly say rape.

false rape reports are very very rare. it's much more likely to go unreported because of assholes who think women make up or deserve to get raped.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
(Continued)

But, ya see, many men DO know what consent is. That's just it, and that's why they get so offended when people insist on treating them as if they're ruthless animals based on instinct that need to be taught "it's not okay!" for literally EVERY man. It's no different than teaching all black people not to steal, or all Indians not to drink, or all Asians not to drive so shitty. It's insulting and it's degrading for anyone to even think "Teach men not to rape!" is okay.

I'd like to see those reports on that. Surely, with the popularity of rape and rape statistics, you can provide them again

You think?
www.returnofkings.com/22079/the-truth-about-false-rape-accusations-that-all-men-should-know
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape#FBI_statistics
www.theforensicexaminer.com/archive/spring09/15/
www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2013/10/24/statistics-dont-back-up-claims-about-rape-culture
www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2009/10/how_often_do_women_falsely_cry_rape.html
straightstatistics.org/article/crying-rape-falsely-rare-or-common

In case you don't want to read all of those, it basically comes to 8-12% of all rape allegations are fabricated. A bit over twice as much as any other crime

And who in this whole wide world would EVER shove a rape-claim under the table because "Oh, she deserved it". Do you even HEAR yourself? Do you know how many people would have their jobs and lives ruined if they did that? Do you honestly believe that the majority of men believe women 'deserve' to be raped?

One of the biggest reasons rape is considered the 'crime of crimes' is because, if there's no evidence, it basically comes down to a battle of "He said/She said", and it's a common fact that juries will nearly always support the woman over the man in legal battles. Not to mention it is the fault of feminists themselves that the term 'rape' is so subjective when it shouldn't be
#86 - BloodAwaits (04/18/2014) [-]
Stop, stop, stop! STOP USING ALL YOUR LOGIC.
User avatar #29 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
But if 'no' comes in different forms, doesn't consent do the same? If she takes her shirt off and starts grinding against me, I'm not gonna ask "do...do you wanna have sex now?", I'm gonna roll with it and start feeling her up. If that happens, should I get slapped as she screams "I didn't give consent!", no, because she DID, if you can give a "non-verbal" no, you can also give a non-verbal consent.

What if she initiates it, does that mean I don't have to ask, but she does or else it's rape?

If they don't feel comfortable saying no, they shouldn't be out. I'm serious. If you 'weren't comfortable saying no' to being an accessory to murder, you would still be tried. Don't you fucking start that bullshit. Again, if you say it is my responsibility to ask for consent, it is HERS to say 'no'. And who the fuck doesn't realize they're allowed to say no? Really? Do you honestly mean I have to tell her every time "now, you don't have to have sex with me just because *List off every single reason I can think of that she might feel obligated to have sex with me*" before we have sex?

Nobody is blaming anyone, and only idiots actually believe "victim blaming" is a cultural thing. What people REALLY say is that shit happens, and you are nearly always able to prevent or postpone it somehow. Does that make it your fault? No, absolutely not, but you CAN be smarter about things. Like a person looking both ways before they cross the street; if they don't and get hit by a car, are they at fault? No. Are they an idiot? Yes. Because shit happens and until this world is perfect, we need to look out for ourselves.

What's wrong with educating women on growing a spine and saying "no"? It's the exact same logic.

I wouldn't, which is why I'm not a filthy criminal, and guess what, if I WAS a filthy criminal, I really wouldn't care.

And it's also simple enough to say 'no'. You seem to be defending women for something that's just as easy for them to do as it is for men to do. That is, speak.
User avatar #47 - goodcheese (04/18/2014) [-]
if she initiates it and doesn't ask then she risks raping you yes. Again the only way KNOW that someone wants sex is to ask. people have consensual sex all the time where nobody asked consent but that's a risk that the person initiating sex takes. The only way to know for sure.

and yes we should encourage being safe always. but lets say i get hit by a drunk driver and i'm not wearing a seat belt and i get very badly injured, i could've been safer but it never stopped the drunk driver.

and yes most rape and sexual assault curriculums emphasize communication on both parts but again if someone is initiating sex it is there responsibility to ask

if i'm offering food you can take it. if i'm not you have to ask. you wouldn't try and take it without asking and just hope i don't say no. and in regards to your other comment, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, everyone knows that. which emphasizes the importance of education.

and we can have a statistics battle, yes 2-8% is a lot but 92-98% is a whole lot more. not to mention there is a difference between falsely reported rape and false accusations. the majority of that 2-8% statistic means a woman made up an attack against an unspecified aggressor which harms nobody but the woman's credibility. it's very rare for a woman to actually name an individual as someone who raped her. and the 60% of unreported cases are pretty shocking. and many comments suggest that one deserves rape such as "what was she wearing" "what did she expect" etc. these create a culture where we focus on women and how they can prevent someone from raping them and taking the focus off of people who actually commit rape.

the teach men not to rape is not meant to assume all men are rapists but to bring attention to the fact that there are quite a lot of men who do rape. 1 in 6 women and 1 in 33 men are victims of a rape or sexual assault in their lifetime so it does happen a lot. we need to educate people on what consent means.
User avatar #58 - hargleblarg (04/18/2014) [-]
I'd just like to chip-in on this little debate with something.

Throughout this whole thing it's implied that only men rape. Yes, it's mostly men who are rapists, but there are plenty of women rapists too. Why not teach women not to rape?
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
(Continued)

Just as well, men can also go to jail due to false rape accusations, and many men have. Considering the very flimsy definitions of rape, what counts as rape, and the general lack of evidence that is often associated with rape (as it generally happens in private areas and the woman can always refuse to give D.N.A. tests). I mean, people have gone to prison over rape claims 40 years after the rapes occurred (that's not to say the claims were false, it just means the amount of evidence required is not substantial, as it's common knowledge that the law and jury's nearly always favour the woman over the man).

Didn't you say earlier that it was often someone close to the woman who rapes her?

Another person before you first claimed that 30% of rapes go unreported, then he claimed 70%, now you're claiming 60%. Do you see what I mean when I say it is unreliable and should not be included?

I would like to see those comments made 'often, please; as I have only ever found a few out of a hundred that actually support the rapist over the woman and they tend to be down-voted into oblivion (provided they're not trolls, of course...). There IS no rape culture because that doesn't happen, I have only ever heard of "what were you wearing at the time" in a rape case on a fictional TV show. Nobody blames the victim; at most, people DO say "well what do you expect", when she puts herself into a bad situation and then gets raped. Again, that's not to say they're BLAMING her, they're saying she could have been smarter, which is true.

I would like to see those statistics of yours, as they seem extraordinarily high, and there is absolutely no way they would be true WITHOUT literally thousands of well-documented and cited reports to back them up. I mean, good lords, I've known hundreds if not thousands of women throughout my life and can count on one hand how many have been raped, and that's me taking their word for it.

No, what we need to do is nail down what "Rape" is.
User avatar #51 - captainfuckitall (04/18/2014) [-]
Then why is it so that a woman can consent to sex and then take it back later and the man can still be tried for rape? Are there some cases where yes doesn't actually mean yes? Should these people really be treated as adults?

That's true, but people would still call you an idiot for not wearing a seat-belt. Again, nobody would blame you, but they WOULD be right in saying you could have prepared yourself better.

But again, should it not then be the other person's responsibility to give a clear and concise answer? I mean, if I asked if I could have some food and you said "Hmm, well, I'm not sure, maybe, I'm okay with you having some now, but might not be okay with it later", that would just be retarded. So if you go to another country and accidentally break the law, or do something negative by cultural standards, you should receive full punishment/be ostracized? Because the majority of England, who lets its immigrants get away with crimes all the time due to cultural differences, would disagree with you. Education is important, but again, you cannot go out of your way to learn something you do not know exists, nor can you be taught something by a teacher who doesn't know it exists. If all men must take a class to know "How not to rape", all women should take one on "How to say no".

8-12%, actually. You're still right, though; 88-92% still is much higher, and I'm not making excuses for rapists or saying victims should be marginalized. I'm saying rape accusations happen. We also cannot bring up the amount of rapes unreported, as by the very nature of them going unreported, you CAN'T report them. All we CAN report is the amount of rape claims that are false. And it does harm people, actually; plenty of people have had their lives ruined because of false-rape accusations, because even HAVING an accusation thrown against you can be the difference between getting that high paying job or being fired, because why would anyone want a potential rapist on their payroll?
#25 - You can also just get him with plague and wait for him to die.… 04/18/2014 on Demon's Souls 0
#24 - Imagine if he fought you at full strength the entire time. … 04/18/2014 on Demon's Souls 0
#22 - *Beware the terrifying foe ahead* "Ha-ha! What t… 04/18/2014 on Demon's Souls +20
#37 - Comment deleted 04/18/2014 on When girls complain about... +2

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#515 - mcburd ONLINE (02/20/2015) [-]
#513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek ONLINE (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)