Upload
Login or register

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#587
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 78892 total,  96883 ,  17991
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 84.3% (843/1000)
Level 367 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 368 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10927
Total Comments Made:20812
FJ Points:40047

latest user's comments

#5 - "But everyone prayed for France last week? How could this… 11/25/2015 on Cut4Bieber +1
#78 - But wouldn't you be able to SEE if it was Harvey Dent via his face?  [+] (1 new reply) 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong +1
User avatar
#80 - bohemianblasphemy (11/25/2015) [-]
At that point in the timeline, I don't believe Dent became Two-Face yet. Then again, this is Arkham Origins we're talking about; I'd take it with a grain of salt.
#77 - Sorry old chap, I have no idea what the name was, I only remem… 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
#43 - Except juggling a dozen theories at once isn't efficient at al… 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
#41 - Never once did I say the Riddler would completely ignore it, I…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
User avatar
#42 - sugoi (11/25/2015) [-]
No I'm pretty sure you're the retard here trying to frustrate.

Since you know, you could just multi-task and follow both, shit aint complicated since you're supposed to draw your conclusions from the evidence you find not find evidence based on a pre-mature conclusion you've already made.

But I guess that way of thinking must have eluded you.
User avatar
#43 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
Except juggling a dozen theories at once isn't efficient at all.

"STARTING FROM MOST LIKELY TO LEAST LIKELY IN A FASHION THAT ALSO BENEFITS EFFICIENCY IN THE TIME IT WILL TAKE TO REACH A CONCLUSION. " Already covered your second statement. I find it funny how you claim multi-tasking eludes me when you are unable to imagine someone switching their workload over new evidence they found.
#39 - What the **** are you talking about? "Yeah I cou…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
User avatar
#40 - sugoi (11/25/2015) [-]
Are you stupid? They lead to completely different goals.

This isn't schrodingers batman, there is no "path of least resistance" there is only one correct bath, either your theory is wrong or it's correct. It's to completely ignore the possibility of Batman having a benefactor with absolutely no evidence for it is completely retarded.
User avatar
#41 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
Never once did I say the Riddler would completely ignore it, I said that out of the TWO VIABLE OPTIONS (that is, that he has a benefactor or he IS the one), in his attempts to FIGURE IT OUT, he has to FOLLOW ONE TRAIL until it REACHES A CONCLUSION, that conclusion may be BATMAN'S IDENTITY, or it may lead to a DEAD END. IN THIS CASE, with BOTH VIABLE OPTIONS, EACH OF WHICH MAY BE TRUE AND LIKELY, the Riddler would follow THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE until it is either proven BATMAN'S IDENTITY or leads to a DEAD END, at which case he will MOVE ONTO THE NEXT ONE, CONTINUING UNTIL ALL VIABLE THEORIES ARE EXHAUSTED, STARTING FROM MOST LIKELY TO LEAST LIKELY IN A FASHION THAT ALSO BENEFITS EFFICIENCY IN THE TIME IT WILL TAKE TO REACH A CONCLUSION.

Do you understand now or do I have to enunciate more or make it even simpler?
>Inb4 "I was just pretending to be retarded to frustrate you"
User avatar
#42 - sugoi (11/25/2015) [-]
No I'm pretty sure you're the retard here trying to frustrate.

Since you know, you could just multi-task and follow both, shit aint complicated since you're supposed to draw your conclusions from the evidence you find not find evidence based on a pre-mature conclusion you've already made.

But I guess that way of thinking must have eluded you.
User avatar
#43 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
Except juggling a dozen theories at once isn't efficient at all.

"STARTING FROM MOST LIKELY TO LEAST LIKELY IN A FASHION THAT ALSO BENEFITS EFFICIENCY IN THE TIME IT WILL TAKE TO REACH A CONCLUSION. " Already covered your second statement. I find it funny how you claim multi-tasking eludes me when you are unable to imagine someone switching their workload over new evidence they found.
#33 - Yes, but keep in mind that it would also be more difficult to …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
User avatar
#34 - Ruspanic (11/25/2015) [-]
I suppose it depends on whether the Riddler is relying mostly on deduction or investigation. If it's down to several broad possibilities (billionaire vs sponsored vigilante vs government agent, for example), and he has to investigate each of those possibilities separately, then sure, maybe he'll check the easiest route first. But even that might not necessarily be the case if he thinks that each possibility has a different probability - for example, if he thinks there's only 5% chance that Batman is a billionaire leading a dual life, vs 65% chance of him having a billionaire's backing, or something.

Black Widow was a loose analogy. Perhaps Batman is secretly employed by Gotham's local or state government rather than the feds, as a deniable asset. What Batman does isn't legal, but it is effective, so perhaps they use him for things the police can't handle easily. And the police don't know about it. The Suicide Squad is an example of the government doing something very similar, though not for vigilantism and not with the consent of the participants. But there've been other instances of the government sponsoring superheroes as well, like when Superman worked for the Reagan administration in The Dark Knight Returns, or when President Lex Luthor hired Captain Atom, Power Girl, Starfire and others as official government-sponsored heroes.
Or perhaps he's one of many such government agents: after all, every major city in DC's America has at least one costumed vigilante based in it. Coincidence?
If we didn't already know who Batman was and how he got his tech, there'd be a shitton of possibilities.
#28 - He would, but he has obsessive compulsive disorder and likes b…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong +1
User avatar
#72 - ronyx (11/25/2015) [-]
wow post the comic pls
User avatar
#77 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
Sorry old chap, I have no idea what the name was, I only remember seeing it.
User avatar
#31 - YllekNayr (11/25/2015) [-]
He's not a great villain, is really what it boils down to
#25 - It isn't too far-fetched, but it's just improbable because of … 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
#24 - It's not that, it's just that both are viable, except one is e…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/25/2015 on The conspiracy is strong 0
User avatar
#38 - sugoi (11/25/2015) [-]
So with no other reason other than "one is easier" you just follow that one.
Well okay then top detective work there riddler.
User avatar
#39 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
What the fuck are you talking about?

"Yeah I could call my friend to see where they are, but I could ALSO look all over town for them..."

You have two choices, there's a prize at the top of a hill you can grab, you can either run up a little slope, OR you can go through a treacherous rock climb, both options have a 50% chance of letting you reach the top, which are you gonna do first?

If you obviously don't understand following the path of least resistance as far as it leads, you are either TRYING to be difficult or you're genuinely handicapped. Either way, please never attempt to raise children.
User avatar
#40 - sugoi (11/25/2015) [-]
Are you stupid? They lead to completely different goals.

This isn't schrodingers batman, there is no "path of least resistance" there is only one correct bath, either your theory is wrong or it's correct. It's to completely ignore the possibility of Batman having a benefactor with absolutely no evidence for it is completely retarded.
User avatar
#41 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
Never once did I say the Riddler would completely ignore it, I said that out of the TWO VIABLE OPTIONS (that is, that he has a benefactor or he IS the one), in his attempts to FIGURE IT OUT, he has to FOLLOW ONE TRAIL until it REACHES A CONCLUSION, that conclusion may be BATMAN'S IDENTITY, or it may lead to a DEAD END. IN THIS CASE, with BOTH VIABLE OPTIONS, EACH OF WHICH MAY BE TRUE AND LIKELY, the Riddler would follow THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE until it is either proven BATMAN'S IDENTITY or leads to a DEAD END, at which case he will MOVE ONTO THE NEXT ONE, CONTINUING UNTIL ALL VIABLE THEORIES ARE EXHAUSTED, STARTING FROM MOST LIKELY TO LEAST LIKELY IN A FASHION THAT ALSO BENEFITS EFFICIENCY IN THE TIME IT WILL TAKE TO REACH A CONCLUSION.

Do you understand now or do I have to enunciate more or make it even simpler?
>Inb4 "I was just pretending to be retarded to frustrate you"
User avatar
#42 - sugoi (11/25/2015) [-]
No I'm pretty sure you're the retard here trying to frustrate.

Since you know, you could just multi-task and follow both, shit aint complicated since you're supposed to draw your conclusions from the evidence you find not find evidence based on a pre-mature conclusion you've already made.

But I guess that way of thinking must have eluded you.
User avatar
#43 - captainfuckitall (11/25/2015) [-]
Except juggling a dozen theories at once isn't efficient at all.

"STARTING FROM MOST LIKELY TO LEAST LIKELY IN A FASHION THAT ALSO BENEFITS EFFICIENCY IN THE TIME IT WILL TAKE TO REACH A CONCLUSION. " Already covered your second statement. I find it funny how you claim multi-tasking eludes me when you are unable to imagine someone switching their workload over new evidence they found.