x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9558
Comment Ranking:#520
Highest Content Rank:#9533
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 58204 total,  71193 ,  12989
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 75.7% (757/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10864
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16669
FJ Points:24989

latest user's comments

#19 - No it wasn't. In your old comment that you so cowardly deleted…  [+] (21 new replies) 02/13/2015 on (untitled) +2
User avatar #37 - SteyrAUG (02/13/2015) [-]
Did you get screencaps of his comments?
User avatar #39 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Nope, but I remember them (not word for word, of course).

His first comment was about how the man was actually innocent and the woman ruined his life only to steal the last thing he had, his bike, in this female dominated society; and people just insulted him and called him a neckbeard for it as you can see. In his second comment he tried to pass it off as "Not serious" but "Something to make people think", further getting upset at sharknik and mocking his picture saying "And I'm sure dogs don't laugh like that", ending his rant by saying that, because he is not an asshole, he will thumb sharknik up in a desperate attempt to seem noble. I called him out on it, and the following comments are what transpired.
User avatar #40 - SteyrAUG (02/13/2015) [-]
It sounds like he tried to write a satire and went slightly too far with it.

And then he went off claiming his mental superiority.
User avatar #70 - wrocky (02/14/2015) [-]
jst 4got to tip his fedora
User avatar #43 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Eh, I have no clue. By general rule I consider all "I was just pretending to be retarded" arguments as completely serious that just weren't accepted by the majority, so they tried to play it off as a joke.
User avatar #20 - scorpidea (02/13/2015) [-]
I never claimed to be right, nor cared if I was. If you and every person on this site thought I was a pussy, it wouldn't mean jack shit. I'm not gunna get paid any more or less because of it. My wife and kid aren't gunna run off. My world isn't going to..... anything. Despite your vitriol, I still don't hate you, I just hope that you don't hurt yourself getting all worked up over this... calm down, none of it is of any importance what-so-ever...
User avatar #59 - thevaulthunter (02/13/2015) [-]
I've seen you before. You were talking about fucking a pan of bacon,
Bacon is for eating.
User avatar #65 - scorpidea (02/13/2015) [-]
Bacon is life.
User avatar #69 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Golly gee wiz scorpidea, why the thumbs down? What happened to that big "I'm not an asshole like you guys" quip? Or are you just like that until people stop looking
User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I thought you were leaving, yet apparently you insist on coming back and assuring me you are calm and, in fact, not mad.

Good job, buddy. I'm sure everyone believes you.

Are you gonna come back to assure me you don't care if they believe that too, but talk about how you really ARE calm and, in fact, not mad?
#22 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Why do you care what everyone thinks of him? His opinion really matter that much to you?
#24 - KimJongUn has deleted their comment.
User avatar #23 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I don't, I'm mocking him.
User avatar #25 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Well, unfortunately you both look like raging idiots. And now I do too, for replying to the wrong comment first.
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
The difference is I'm fine looking like a raging idiot, that's what the internet is for.
User avatar #27 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Sure dude, whatever helps you sleep at night.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Says the person trying to look cool.

You realize what you said makes no sense, right? I already told you I accepted that I look stupid, it's not a 'coping mechanism', it just is. This is no different than you admitting you lean left in political parties or you like ketchup more than mustard and someone just pats you and says "Sure pal, if that helps you cope, whatever you say".
User avatar #29 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Uh huh. I'm sure everybody believes you.

Are you gunna come back to assure me that you don't care if you look stupid, but talk about how you really AREN'T just trying to cope with being, in fact, an idiot like him?
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I know you're trying to show me the irony or mishap of my comments before by using my same logic, but it's not working; you only look like you're brown-nosing him.
User avatar #31 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Nah, I am just having fun, cuz I am bored and you keep replying. I am gunna go finish staining my cabinets now. Troll on brother, keep the dream alive!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Neither you nor your idol know what trolling is. I'd just as soon say you're the same guy on multiple accounts.
#12 - Eh, as metal as this is, I disagree completely. True…  [+] (18 new replies) 02/13/2015 on Metal as fuck +1
#26 - anonymous (02/13/2015) [-]
Actually, this guy is kind of interesting. He was an atheist, yet was also a fatalist, meaning he believed in fate and predestination and that we are powerless to do anything to change it. In other words, he's not a very smart philosopher as he just contradicted his own philosophy in saying we can be free in the conditions he presents (kill kings and priests), but then believes we are all enslaved to a fate that we can't get away from.
[spoiler] [0/10 worst philosopher ever/spoiler]
#18 - anonymous (02/13/2015) [-]
Stop thinking retarded things son you are embarassing yourself. Men arent free due to the effects these institutions have on them: like the amount of control they find themselves into and the level of influence over their decisions. "Killing" or overcoming these coercive set of ideas would let the population finally focus on their wellbeing instead on feeding systems that dont have their interest in mind and that in the long run do very little for them.
The only question is whether of not these individuals still need these ideas, and for the most part we still do, because the average people is very stupid. If you dont feel like you need them, go ahead and become one of the people that make the decisions otherwise you dont know how to play.
User avatar #20 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I don't know, considering someone stupid or smart based on whether or not they agree with you is pretty stupid in and of itself, don't you think?

How? Since when has killing one dictator prevented the rise of another? Since when has snuffing out one piece of corruption stopped another from taking route? What you are talking about requires more than just 'removing' people, but removing very ideas, stopping the very EXISTENCE of people in high authority and the concept of being there, but once that happens, where do you go? If you kill a President and don't allow people to take office, governors would have all the power. Kill the governors and the senators would have the power. Kill the senators and the mayors would have the power. Kill the mayors and the shop owners would have the power, see where I'm going with this? Removing the idea of "this certain height cannot be reached" doesn't lessen suffering a single bit, because then the heights that ARE capable of being reached become the new Everest and it would continue that way down to a single bump in the road. Dig it?

Anyone is capable of having power. I am capable of killing you, robbing you, exiling you, and others with greater power are capable of preventing or taking back those decisions, that's all. Anyone is capable of having any semblance of power and constrain anyone they want if only for a brief time. In order to be free, we must understand this, and that we do not have to LISTEN or ALLOW people with this brief power to do these things if we do not want them to simply by summoning our own.
#23 - manosheladas (02/13/2015) [-]
First of all "killing" is a metaphor. In a population you can overcome rule (monarchy for example) for a brief time until you relinquish the decision making to other individuals because people live in societies made of systems ruled by axioms, you can trick yourself and pretend to be free from rule but thinking you are free doesnt make it so you still have the same kind of impact; A state of mind can not take you out of the cage, what you have is an adventage that makes you able to use it to get ahead from the average, why? because shit runs down hill, that is the flaw in your idea i was criticising, you are only half way there its a half baked idea, true freedom is not only a state of mind. That is the reason why figures with authority cant be teared down, im only pointing out the character of the limits you speak of, and what is the point of being mentally free if you cant use it to your advatage or to get what you want (a level of tangible freedom), awerness is a tool, ideas dont do all the work.
You cant deny that people are fucking dumb, they clearly act against their own interest, and if they dont realise the nature of the system the live in, they are evem more so stupid.
If your only answer to be totally free is to be a hermit or free in a state of mind? You have a view that also doesnt lessen the suffering a single bit, its indifferent, indifference keeps bloodshed and thats the outcome so how does that make the idea different at the end? People not only have the power to contain you as much as you let them and you dont maintain your freedom by wishfull thinking you live on a ordered community, i bet you dont know what the destruction of your will power does to your state of mind.
By saying "The only question is whether of not these individuals still need these ideas" the individuals in a population have to act against control by harnessing it, create influence, make use of ideologies, systems and dogmas to overcome them, that is in the societies we live in, otherwise you can only perpetuate them, thats the alternative which gives you freedom.
User avatar #15 - Yardie (02/13/2015) [-]
That's an interesting point to think about. But the thing is there are universally accepted axioms like "don't murder" or "don't steal" that come about when you apply universal ethics. For example theft cannot be a universally ethical action because you cannot both steal and want to be stolen from at the same time because by definition if you steal something you are keeping it for yourself.

Generally religion and government have been the exception to those moral axioms throughout history. The Church was allowed to kidnap and torture heathens. The Government is allowed to steal from, kidnap, and murder people based on a set of laws, which in a Monarchy are basically the Ruler's whims.

I would say that philosophical freedom still requires the adherence to rational and universal ethics. It's a separate category from free will. So a free world would be a world where society functions based on universal ethics.

Now that doesn't mean everybody lives in some kind of ridiculous utopia where there is no theft and murder, but it does mean that society becomes less tolerant and more skeptical of immoral action.
User avatar #16 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
But that doesn't quite make sense; just because you do not want something done to you doesn't mean it's unethical to do it to others. For example, if someone tries to kill you FIRST and you kill them in self-defense, you are not an unethical person.

But that could be said of ANY government or person in authority, can't it? People with power have a tendency to abuse it, even if it is as simple as an owner over a pet, and even in small ways.

But that fails for the same reason the plot of Portal started, just because you can admit something is good or adhere to a code of ethics and conduct doesn't mean you cannot break it later. Likewise, just because you know what is the right thing to do doesn't mean you will choose to do it.

And then we come to the question of: How much can something be done before immoral action is considered right? In the movie Unthinkable, there is a terrorist who is caught and threatened to detonate three atomic bombs. In order to try to prevent this, the interrogator murders the terrorists wife in front of him and brings in his children in order to torture them to find out the location of the bombs. Is he 'right' in doing so if it saves the country they're in? Or is he an evil person regardless of the outcome?
User avatar #19 - Yardie (02/13/2015) [-]
It's not the do not want, it's the cannot want. You can not want to steal and be stolen from at the same time. It doesn't logically follow, therefore stealing cannot be ethically virtuous behavior.

Self defense is kinda tricky. The aggressor is rejecting the universal ethics, and is therefore no longer protected by the universal ethics, and at that point it's just primal survival tactics. I'll get more into this in a second.

Of course it applies to any government or person in authority. It's universal. Doesn't mean people will not abuse power, it just means that it needs to be recognized that the abuse of power is more often than not immoral.

Again, in your last example, you're describing a case of self-defense. Ethics are completely tossed out the window when somebody points a gun at you. They don't matter. Your life and the lives of others are more important at that point. Hurting other people in the process? Probably not the best course of action to take, but if it's absolutely necessary, then let society be the judge I guess. Obviously if somebody is holding your daughter hostage, starting a mass genocide or involving innocent people to stop it is not usually reasonably justified behavior.

It's really difficult to say what is right in the realm of self-defense because somebody's already broken a universal principle. Wouldn't it be the fault of the aggressor at that point? He's forcing somebody to take drastic action. I don't have the answers, but it's definitely something worth thinking about and talking about.
User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I agree, but we're just dealing with an issue of semantics at this point. What does 'stealing' imply? Can you steal something that has no owner? What counts as an owner? Are you stealing if you are taking something rightfully yours even if no one considers it yours? Who decides what is rightfully yours? So on, so fourth. I'm not arguing with you about what ethics implies, I'm arguing about what IS ethical and what is not.

Oh? Is the thought that Ethics do not apply to everyone Ethical in itself? Isn't the point of morals and ethics to pursue them regardless of our surroundings or circumstances, including the actions of others? If a dishonourable act is done against someone dishonourable, is it okay?

Very well, we agree on this.

Mhmm, I completely agree.

One of the issues that I face, regarding morals and ethics, all the time is whether or not I should follow them always or if there are situations I can disregard them. For example, say I follow a religion, and one of the laws of the religion is that I cannot do X; suddenly, my religion is on the verge of extinction and I can save it by doing X. Is X right to do, even if it's against my principles, in order to SAVE my principles? Or by breaking them, does that make me as hollow or heartless as the people trying to destroy me FOR my principles?

#36 - randomdudelny (02/13/2015) [-]
What are you twelve or something?

Didn't they teach you in school about Plato?
The key to a perfect society is finding a kind and wise leader that doesn't want to lead.

Also, allow me to repeat what I understood from your first commentary:
"You are free to starve to death."
No shit Sherlok, humans can not survive on their own, we need society, need teamwork in order to prevail. Isolation is literaly the end.

The answer we are looking for is balance between knoledge, respect, kindness and altruism.
Because while "freedom is a state of mind" I find it hard to concentrate when:
1) The pope is brain washing me to "allahu akbar" your sorry ass of this planet.
2) I am doing forced labour in the Gulag for the leader.
3) I am canibalizing your ass because 4 days have past since I last ate something.
User avatar #38 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
The sad thing is, even if I WAS 12, that would still be a step up over someone who assumes people are stupid for not agreeing with them, eh?

They did, though I also know of other philosophers who stated many differing things. Do you? Just because someone is your favourite doesn't make them correct, after-all.

A "wise and kind leader who doesn't want to lead" would be hopeless. They would feel unconfident and uncomfortable with the situation, they would be indecisive and, since not seeing themselves as someone made to be a leader, would be hesitant to make tough decisions or any decisions at all. When's the last time YOU were good at something you didn't want to do?

Indeed you are, you are also free to grow your own crops or hunt as you please, dig it? Humans can and have survived on their own plenty of times. Vagrants, Vagabonds, Hermits, and many holy men often isolate themselves from the majority of the world and spend nearly all of their adventures alone, or at least, independent. Just because you are incapable doesn't mean it can't be done.

And how are those traits in a leader going to stop a criminal or a renegade? As a matter of fact, how would they stop anyone? Last time I checked, GIVING respect and kindness did not entitle you to receiving it, and there are many people who would simply not want to give it back. Even with your idea of a perfect leader, people would still want to "allahu akbar" your ass, still want to force you into a Gulag for their other leader, and still want to look out for themselves if they came to an ultimatum.

Congratulations, your 'perfect society' run by a 'perfect leader' solved literally nothing.

Anyways, as I was saying; by being free in the state of your mind and understanding you are the master of your own destiny, regardless of what else my try to confine or defeat you, people can understand they do not HAVE to 'allahu akbar' your ass to see their goals, they can understand they do not have to work under a tyrant, and they can understand teamwork would be the best option in an ultimatum; after that, it all comes down to personal choice.
#39 - randomdudelny (02/13/2015) [-]
Holy shit you really didn't studied Plato!

Read nigga, read!

And then we will keep talking.
User avatar #40 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Running away from an argument due to assumptions only makes you look worse.

Also, you do realize that most of Plato's theories were just rehashes of Socrates', right? Nearly everything he wrote about was a 'branch off' of what his teacher said. You picked a very shitty favourite philosopher.
#41 - randomdudelny (02/13/2015) [-]
Quickly scrolling wikipedia doesn't count.
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Neither does dodging my arguments :^)
#44 - randomdudelny (02/13/2015) [-]
Ok senpai but my body doesn't crave redneck free for all isolation.

It craves Eurpean Nordic master race society.
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Which comes down to subjective opinion, doesn't it?

Once more, for the record, not liking a view doesn't automatically make it incorrect, and in HOLDING that view, you are only blinding yourself to personal growth and potential. That's probably why you cause most of your own problems. Work on that.
#48 - randomdudelny (02/13/2015) [-]
Oh yes, this has to be good !

Please enumerate my problems and elaborate solutions for every one of them.
User avatar #22 - Yardie (02/13/2015) [-]
Well property rights have been well defined by a lot of philosophers and economists a lot better than what I can do. But essentially somebody owns something when they appropriate their own work into it. For example if you build a house on a plot of land, you've turned the land into a product and I would say you now own that product of your labor. If you pay money for it or trade for it, then the same can be said.

Basically what you own is a product of your labor, whether you paid for it indirectly or made it directly yourself. You can then relinquish your ownership to somebody through trade, or use it for yourself. Supply and demand work as a price mechanism for how valuable your property is to society and a whole mess of economics flows from there.

And of course ethics are meant to be always pursued. That doesn't mean they can be in all circumstances. There are physical limitations and uncertainty exists. It is always preferable to not kill people, but if somebody is pointing a knife in your direction you might not have a choice but to defend yourself or risk death.

Maybe I'm missing the point, but "rules" aren't universal ethics. They're arbitrary words backed by strict discipline. There is no "right" or "wrong" when it comes to a rule, because a rule has no moral content. "Thou shalt not kill" isn't a moral argument. It's an ultimatum. "Thou shalt not kill or go to hell" is basically what it means. There's room for contradictions there, and that's not philosophy at all.

To see if something can be applied to universal ethics, you first have to propose it as if it's true. For example "It is moral to steal"

Then you apply universality. If it is moral to steal, then I must allow people to steal from me. If I allow people to steal from me, it's no longer theft. That's literally just giving stuff away. Definition of theft breaks. Therefore it is irrational to say "it is moral to steal." and it can't be applied to universal ethics.

Conversely I can say "Respecting property rights is moral." If I respect property rights, I can own my property, you can own your property, that guy over there can own his property, and we can all willingly trade with each other. There's no breaking of definitions and no contradictions. Therefore it can be said that respecting property rights is perfectly fine universal behavior.
#5 - And then it calls you a faggot and steals your credit cards. 02/13/2015 on I know who REALLY loves me 0
#17 - scorpidea confirmed for coward. 02/13/2015 on (untitled) +14
#16 - Wow, who pissed in your cereal this morning? Why not chill the…  [+] (23 new replies) 02/13/2015 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #18 - scorpidea (02/13/2015) [-]
Wasn't meant as a rant, was supposed to be humorous... obviously others felt differently. I could write you a longer explanation, but you are doubtfully able to hold any meaning conversation, so I will let you just go on about your trolling!

TL; DR Have fun, nigger.
User avatar #19 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
No it wasn't. In your old comment that you so cowardly deleted, you said it was there to make people 'think', not to be humorous, so now you're just a liar too.

Also, insulting people and calling them 'trolls' doesn't make you right either, especially considering being genuine is the exact opposite of trolling.

I am having fun, pussy.
User avatar #37 - SteyrAUG (02/13/2015) [-]
Did you get screencaps of his comments?
User avatar #39 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Nope, but I remember them (not word for word, of course).

His first comment was about how the man was actually innocent and the woman ruined his life only to steal the last thing he had, his bike, in this female dominated society; and people just insulted him and called him a neckbeard for it as you can see. In his second comment he tried to pass it off as "Not serious" but "Something to make people think", further getting upset at sharknik and mocking his picture saying "And I'm sure dogs don't laugh like that", ending his rant by saying that, because he is not an asshole, he will thumb sharknik up in a desperate attempt to seem noble. I called him out on it, and the following comments are what transpired.
User avatar #40 - SteyrAUG (02/13/2015) [-]
It sounds like he tried to write a satire and went slightly too far with it.

And then he went off claiming his mental superiority.
User avatar #70 - wrocky (02/14/2015) [-]
jst 4got to tip his fedora
User avatar #43 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Eh, I have no clue. By general rule I consider all "I was just pretending to be retarded" arguments as completely serious that just weren't accepted by the majority, so they tried to play it off as a joke.
User avatar #20 - scorpidea (02/13/2015) [-]
I never claimed to be right, nor cared if I was. If you and every person on this site thought I was a pussy, it wouldn't mean jack shit. I'm not gunna get paid any more or less because of it. My wife and kid aren't gunna run off. My world isn't going to..... anything. Despite your vitriol, I still don't hate you, I just hope that you don't hurt yourself getting all worked up over this... calm down, none of it is of any importance what-so-ever...
User avatar #59 - thevaulthunter (02/13/2015) [-]
I've seen you before. You were talking about fucking a pan of bacon,
Bacon is for eating.
User avatar #65 - scorpidea (02/13/2015) [-]
Bacon is life.
User avatar #69 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Golly gee wiz scorpidea, why the thumbs down? What happened to that big "I'm not an asshole like you guys" quip? Or are you just like that until people stop looking
User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I thought you were leaving, yet apparently you insist on coming back and assuring me you are calm and, in fact, not mad.

Good job, buddy. I'm sure everyone believes you.

Are you gonna come back to assure me you don't care if they believe that too, but talk about how you really ARE calm and, in fact, not mad?
#22 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Why do you care what everyone thinks of him? His opinion really matter that much to you?
#24 - KimJongUn has deleted their comment.
User avatar #23 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I don't, I'm mocking him.
User avatar #25 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Well, unfortunately you both look like raging idiots. And now I do too, for replying to the wrong comment first.
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
The difference is I'm fine looking like a raging idiot, that's what the internet is for.
User avatar #27 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Sure dude, whatever helps you sleep at night.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Says the person trying to look cool.

You realize what you said makes no sense, right? I already told you I accepted that I look stupid, it's not a 'coping mechanism', it just is. This is no different than you admitting you lean left in political parties or you like ketchup more than mustard and someone just pats you and says "Sure pal, if that helps you cope, whatever you say".
User avatar #29 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Uh huh. I'm sure everybody believes you.

Are you gunna come back to assure me that you don't care if you look stupid, but talk about how you really AREN'T just trying to cope with being, in fact, an idiot like him?
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
I know you're trying to show me the irony or mishap of my comments before by using my same logic, but it's not working; you only look like you're brown-nosing him.
User avatar #31 - KimJongUn (02/13/2015) [-]
Nah, I am just having fun, cuz I am bored and you keep replying. I am gunna go finish staining my cabinets now. Troll on brother, keep the dream alive!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Neither you nor your idol know what trolling is. I'd just as soon say you're the same guy on multiple accounts.
#5 - And lo, the only people who say pot doesn't make you stupid ar…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2015 on So high 0
User avatar #12 - fluffypain (02/13/2015) [-]
i'm pretty sure every drug "makes you stupid", even pot smokers know that atleast the ones i know
User avatar #15 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Not the ones I've argued with here, unfortunately.
#32 - You're really just splitting hairs at this point. Nev…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/13/2015 on House of Weaboos +1
#36 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
Also i forgot to add, on slytherins locket only a parselfmouth can open it.
#35 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
Salazar valued pure blooded wizards and wizards capable of using their true power. Which by that time they had shown themselves to be.

Harry pulling the sword doesnt mean it belongs to him. The enchament on the sword and hat was so that only a true gryffindor could summon it whenever he needed it regardless of its location. Anyone could use the sword if they had found it but not anyone could pull it from the hat. Albus even awarded neville at one point for standing up to harry and showing "true gryffindor beliefs"

The sorting hat can misjudge people but harry never asked to be put into gryffindor. He only requested not to be put into slytherin. He could have been put into ravenclaw or hufflepuff and it would have been a completely different book. The hat chooses which trait is the greatest. Harry didn't want power or fame.

The hat places people into houses based on their values not who theyre most like. Pettigrew was placed into gryffindor because he valued bravery and personal strength even though he couldnt show those things himself and its the opposite with Neville. Neville was a coward at the start but turned out to be one of the most courageous characters in the series even though Neville at first begged to be put into Hufflepuff.

As a side note, at the time of mentioning placement of slytherin to harry it is possible that it detected the horcrux but didnt realize that it wasnt a part of harry it was noticing
#145 - shadowdmoon (02/13/2015) [-]
that damn sword is basically the harry potter equivalent to Mjolnir
#29 - Except that's not true at all. Dumbledor himself prof…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/13/2015 on House of Weaboos +2
#31 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
yes Harry would have done amazing in slytherin but those werent his best traits but he truly belonged in gryffindor which is why he was able to pull gryffindors sword from the sorting hat which was also originally owned by Godric. Slytherin produced Powerful wizards while Gryffindor produced Great ones. And Hermoines choice in bein in gryffindor showed her bravery outweighed her other traits because she knew she was terrible at it yet she still wanted to give it a go.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
You're really just splitting hairs at this point.

Neville was able to pull the sword too, despite the fact that there were many people, Ron, Harry, and Snape included, who were braver than he was. It's also known that the Sorting Hat is capable of making mistakes and can misjudge people, so it only makes sense that it applies to other magical items too.

Also, weren't Harry and friends able to find Salazars locket, despite the fact that, it too, had a similar enchantment on it?
#36 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
Also i forgot to add, on slytherins locket only a parselfmouth can open it.
#35 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
Salazar valued pure blooded wizards and wizards capable of using their true power. Which by that time they had shown themselves to be.

Harry pulling the sword doesnt mean it belongs to him. The enchament on the sword and hat was so that only a true gryffindor could summon it whenever he needed it regardless of its location. Anyone could use the sword if they had found it but not anyone could pull it from the hat. Albus even awarded neville at one point for standing up to harry and showing "true gryffindor beliefs"

The sorting hat can misjudge people but harry never asked to be put into gryffindor. He only requested not to be put into slytherin. He could have been put into ravenclaw or hufflepuff and it would have been a completely different book. The hat chooses which trait is the greatest. Harry didn't want power or fame.

The hat places people into houses based on their values not who theyre most like. Pettigrew was placed into gryffindor because he valued bravery and personal strength even though he couldnt show those things himself and its the opposite with Neville. Neville was a coward at the start but turned out to be one of the most courageous characters in the series even though Neville at first begged to be put into Hufflepuff.

As a side note, at the time of mentioning placement of slytherin to harry it is possible that it detected the horcrux but didnt realize that it wasnt a part of harry it was noticing
#145 - shadowdmoon (02/13/2015) [-]
that damn sword is basically the harry potter equivalent to Mjolnir
#26 - There's a lot I don't actually get about the sorting hat. …  [+] (13 new replies) 02/12/2015 on House of Weaboos +9
User avatar #38 - juter (02/13/2015) [-]
No one simply gets sorted into Gryffindor; you have to choose Gryffindor, because only the brave go out to seek challenge or thrill. Harry would have gone to Slytherin had he not refused them, Hermione would have gone to Ravenclaw had she not desired to go elsewhere, and Ron would have gone to Hufflepuff because he isn't particularly good at anything.
#206 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
ron was going to gryffindor anyway. all weaslys go to gryffindor.
User avatar #235 - juter (02/13/2015) [-]
All the Weasleys have asked to be in Gryffindor for their own reasons
#249 - janosaudron (02/14/2015) [-]
the hat straight up said "Weasley? i know where to put you. GRYFFINDOR!"

it was on his head for about 3 seconds.
User avatar #260 - juter (02/14/2015) [-]
I'M TRYING TO BE HAPPY
#37 - juter (02/13/2015) [-]
The Sorting Hat foresaw this and saved us from the nightmare
#27 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
The hat doesn't take personal choice into account, the hat tests people. It know's where theyre supposed to go and it tests them to make sure that its right. That's why the hat mentioned putting harry in slytherin, it knew he would object to it and it was the same with hermoine and ron when it came down to it bravery outweighed all their other traits throughout the whole series.
User avatar #29 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
Except that's not true at all.

Dumbledor himself professed that Harry, even despite the Horcrux, had every trait Salazar Slytherin valued in excess, and the Hat, upon their second meeting, mentioned that Harry would have done great in Slytherin.

Likewise, Hermoine had a terrible time being brave, and it was only with the influence of Ron and Harry that she became so near the end of the series. She wanted to be in Gryffindor, despite being more suited to Ravenclaw, because she liked challenges (also a trait of Ravenclaw) and found more challenge in being brave and determined than she did in being curious and wise.
#31 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
yes Harry would have done amazing in slytherin but those werent his best traits but he truly belonged in gryffindor which is why he was able to pull gryffindors sword from the sorting hat which was also originally owned by Godric. Slytherin produced Powerful wizards while Gryffindor produced Great ones. And Hermoines choice in bein in gryffindor showed her bravery outweighed her other traits because she knew she was terrible at it yet she still wanted to give it a go.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (02/13/2015) [-]
You're really just splitting hairs at this point.

Neville was able to pull the sword too, despite the fact that there were many people, Ron, Harry, and Snape included, who were braver than he was. It's also known that the Sorting Hat is capable of making mistakes and can misjudge people, so it only makes sense that it applies to other magical items too.

Also, weren't Harry and friends able to find Salazars locket, despite the fact that, it too, had a similar enchantment on it?
#36 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
Also i forgot to add, on slytherins locket only a parselfmouth can open it.
#35 - janosaudron (02/13/2015) [-]
Salazar valued pure blooded wizards and wizards capable of using their true power. Which by that time they had shown themselves to be.

Harry pulling the sword doesnt mean it belongs to him. The enchament on the sword and hat was so that only a true gryffindor could summon it whenever he needed it regardless of its location. Anyone could use the sword if they had found it but not anyone could pull it from the hat. Albus even awarded neville at one point for standing up to harry and showing "true gryffindor beliefs"

The sorting hat can misjudge people but harry never asked to be put into gryffindor. He only requested not to be put into slytherin. He could have been put into ravenclaw or hufflepuff and it would have been a completely different book. The hat chooses which trait is the greatest. Harry didn't want power or fame.

The hat places people into houses based on their values not who theyre most like. Pettigrew was placed into gryffindor because he valued bravery and personal strength even though he couldnt show those things himself and its the opposite with Neville. Neville was a coward at the start but turned out to be one of the most courageous characters in the series even though Neville at first begged to be put into Hufflepuff.

As a side note, at the time of mentioning placement of slytherin to harry it is possible that it detected the horcrux but didnt realize that it wasnt a part of harry it was noticing
#145 - shadowdmoon (02/13/2015) [-]
that damn sword is basically the harry potter equivalent to Mjolnir
#378 - Because you were one of the top posters for a month.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
User avatar #379 - slenderwolf (02/12/2015) [-]
Oh seriously? Cool.
#363 - Hey chokinandtokin ************ mattia…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... +1
User avatar #372 - slenderwolf (02/11/2015) [-]
Why am I on that list?
User avatar #378 - captainfuckitall (02/12/2015) [-]
Because you were one of the top posters for a month.
User avatar #379 - slenderwolf (02/12/2015) [-]
Oh seriously? Cool.
User avatar #365 - mudkipfucker (02/11/2015) [-]
yeah, ive learned not to give opinions on the internet
#366 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
Nothing wrong with giving opinions on the internet. Just when people act like faggot hypocrits and expect to win an argument. That's when you have to piss them off.
User avatar #367 - mudkipfucker (02/11/2015) [-]
oh yeah, i had a run in with a certain he man villian account like this
#359 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#360 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
Okay.
#357 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#358 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
Okay.
#355 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#356 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
cuuunt
#353 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#354 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
You're such a stupid fuck.
#351 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#352 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
i wonder how many kids lives you have ruined you monster
#349 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#350 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
or lethal injection
#347 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#348 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
You should be shot
#345 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#346 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
You belong in jail you sicko.
#343 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#344 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
pervert.
#341 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#342 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
sick cunt.
#339 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#340 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
At least you're okay with being a pedo
#337 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#338 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
You're a sick fuck.
#335 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#336 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
Would you like to rape more children?
#333 - Okay.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Have you ever seen these... 0
#334 - xxitzchubbsxx (02/11/2015) [-]
I bet you rape children.

Comments(507):

[ 507 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 507 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)