Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

captainfuckitall    

Rank #391 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 345 Comments: Sold Soul
Online
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#391
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 34 total,  90 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 48286 total,  59214 ,  10928
Content Level Progress: 66.1% (39/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 75.9% (759/1000)
Level 345 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 346 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:20
Content Views:9683
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14679
FJ Points:17984

latest user's comments

#7 - That's the one thing I always hated about Avatar (and it's the…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/13/2013 on A stupid avatar post +1
#9 - missjaykay (11/13/2013) [-]
From what I make of it is like this: everyone in the world can draw. BUT some people are like, born with the talent to draw better then others.
Some times the really good draw--ers have kids who can draw really good liek, and sometimes with kids who can't really draw all to well. And vice versa with teh people who can't draw have kids who are the drawers.
That sound like something going on with the benders? It do to me
warning posting at 2am
User avatar #10 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
The time and your tiredness is no excuse for your awful English and sentence structure. I only forgive you because you helped me see the light.
#30 - My, my, don't you have a high opinion of yourself. It…  [+] (12 new replies) 11/13/2013 on I'd be mad too +3
User avatar #31 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I present facts about his paintings, listing the inconsistencies and the flaws, and you call it justification.
That's the equivalent of refuting the idea of a consistent rate of gravitational acceleration for all objects because 9.8 m/s is a "justification."
No, I don't have that high of an opinion of myself, I just have a low opinion of you. Fuck off, good day, harumph, bah humbug!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Would you like me to list the flaws of the other portraits and sculptures? I'm no critic, but I can name 6 off the top of my head.

No it's not, because that would be discussing something academic, while here we are discussing something based off of creativity. You can judge academia because there is a "right and wrong", but you can't say something is more "right or wrong" than something else on a subjective stand-point. Your example is just you desperately scratching at the bottom of the barrel to try and prove your point.

You do have a high opinion of yourself, evidence by the fact you believe YOU can call of the conversation despite the fact this is an equal one, YOU can 'conclude' something about me as if it were fact, and YOU believe you have a right to tell me to stop posting on content that isn't your own. Honestly, I could mention a million reasons why you being a brony is enough to give an awful opinion about you, but I don't judge you on that because it would be incredibly childish, kind of like how you're being now.
User avatar #33 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
You are wrong.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Holy shit, you have just been wrong this whole time. I'm not going to pander to your sense of self-righteousness any more by arguing the point, because you're so damned dumb that you refuse to even attempt to comprehend your wrongness.
I say again: fuck off.
User avatar #34 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Based upon what, exactly? Other than your insistence

I'm not self-righteous at all, I simply stated that I believe his artwork to be good and argued for why it could be seen as such, it is you who began degrading me and throwing insults.

And now you can't think of anything else other than "But they said..." and so you're trying to avoid the conversation all together. Pro-tip: If you didn't have such an ego that you had to have the last word, this conversation would have been ended long ago exactly like you wanted it.
#35 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
BASED UPON
THE FUCKING FACTS
OF THE PAINTINGS FLAWS
WHICH I HAVE LISTED FOR YOU
EXPLICITLY AND SPECIFICALLY
YOU FUCKING MORON
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
See, you literally have nothing else constructive to put into the argument, yet you still insist on having the last word. You're only proving my point.

Furthermore: 'Conspirators Mindset', everything has flaws when you look for them, as said, I could name many from just looking at the graduated pictures and I'm not even a professional critic. You did list them off, and I am thankful for that, but all I said was that even given those flaws I do not consider his paintings 'worse' than the awful paintings and sculptures shown below, it is you who, again, continues to sling insults, ad hominems, and generally act like a raging child.
User avatar #38 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
If I may interject. Hitler's paintings are and were nothing new, just landscapes and architecture. And the main issue with this is which needs to be taken into consideration is that his paintings aren't that outstanding compared to the many, many other paintings of landscapes and architecture. The reason and issue for why he was not accepted had nothing to do with lack of talent, but lack of expression and creativity. Art is a visual communications of ideas, which is something his paintings are lacking, they're less artworks than they are studies. BUT lets say he did something with them, something that made them stand out and more interesting,
take this piece for example. I say it's on par with Hitler's abilities, but what's different with this? It's use of brush stokes, the blend of blurred and finer detail, the stark vivid colours but most of all this painting achieves mood. People need to understand that art essentially has genres, and each genre produces different style and type. Simple doesn't mean bad, it's what is being communicated that matters first and foremost.
just to repeat, realistic landscapes and people is overdone as fuck and there needs to be more substance, originality and vaster use of conventions.

And yes, a red and black square on a wall in a gallery is bullshit and isn't true art in my eye.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Certainly.

Thank you very much for that very detailed and thought out response. I can see your point now, and while I still believe Hitler was a good artist as far as skill goes, I can see why some do not consider him a good artist and also why he wasn't accepted. I guess just so much of the art I've seen in recent years has been awful 'modern art' (which tends to be just a broom and a rock placed near eachother) that I have really come to respect and admire subtle artwork, landscapes, and proper diagrams. Whether it is a matter of opinion of just a breath of fresh air to me, I still like his art, but thank you very much for explaining why others do not. I have seen the light, you may rest knowing you have educated me, and I will always appreciate it.
#73 - verbavolant (11/13/2013) [-]
I really don't like you. dashgamer said in his very first post " so there was no "life" to his pictures." and you started to troll him, then foliap pretty much said the same thing to you (except more detailed) and now you're all "oh thanks man at least someone can educate me".
I agree with you tho, art is subjective and personal, and you may like it or not (I personally don't care about hitler's art whatsoever), but your attitude was really bad in this thread.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's fine, you don't have to. Although, I respectfully ask that if you are going to dislike me, dislike me on something that's actually true.

1. Indeed he did say that, and I said that I disagreed, purely on a matter of opinion.
2. I did not 'troll' anyone. Through-out then entire conversation I was calm, organized, and willing to listen to anything that actually had basis.
3. Indeed, however he also explained it better, used multiple examples, gave other explanations as to why, and actually talked about why it was a fact his work wasn't poplar, rather than just opinion.
4. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. First you say that it's a point against me because I 'troll', then you say it's a point against me because I am polite and appreciate someone else's input. If you're going to make a point, make it clear.
5. I fail to see how my attitude has been bad at all considering I wasn't the one slinging an insult with every comment, I wasn't the one swearing, I wasn't the one using all capitals, I wasn't the one being belligerent, and I wasn't the one who essentially said 'everyone who has a different opinion just has bad taste'.
User avatar #83 - lasmamoe (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm with you.
#40 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
pic to reflect on sorry
#4 - See, this is the type of **** that makes me terri… 11/13/2013 on watcha gonna do faggit? +20
#28 - That's not what your words suggest. Not every single criti…  [+] (14 new replies) 11/13/2013 on I'd be mad too +1
User avatar #29 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
If you're calling these poorly constructed facsimiles of buildings creative, then you truly have no clue what you're on about.
Discussion over, I've concluded that you're an idiot.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
My, my, don't you have a high opinion of yourself.

It's cute how you go on to judge Hitler about his poor outwork when his faces are FAR better sketched than the faces below, his paintings are far better than sculptures of...poles, and bodies far better than fat people with shading.

Oh yes, we can obviously see how far the opinion of Art Schools is worth.

P.S. You're still letting your anger and bias cloud your judgment.
User avatar #31 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I present facts about his paintings, listing the inconsistencies and the flaws, and you call it justification.
That's the equivalent of refuting the idea of a consistent rate of gravitational acceleration for all objects because 9.8 m/s is a "justification."
No, I don't have that high of an opinion of myself, I just have a low opinion of you. Fuck off, good day, harumph, bah humbug!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Would you like me to list the flaws of the other portraits and sculptures? I'm no critic, but I can name 6 off the top of my head.

No it's not, because that would be discussing something academic, while here we are discussing something based off of creativity. You can judge academia because there is a "right and wrong", but you can't say something is more "right or wrong" than something else on a subjective stand-point. Your example is just you desperately scratching at the bottom of the barrel to try and prove your point.

You do have a high opinion of yourself, evidence by the fact you believe YOU can call of the conversation despite the fact this is an equal one, YOU can 'conclude' something about me as if it were fact, and YOU believe you have a right to tell me to stop posting on content that isn't your own. Honestly, I could mention a million reasons why you being a brony is enough to give an awful opinion about you, but I don't judge you on that because it would be incredibly childish, kind of like how you're being now.
User avatar #33 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
You are wrong.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Holy shit, you have just been wrong this whole time. I'm not going to pander to your sense of self-righteousness any more by arguing the point, because you're so damned dumb that you refuse to even attempt to comprehend your wrongness.
I say again: fuck off.
User avatar #34 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Based upon what, exactly? Other than your insistence

I'm not self-righteous at all, I simply stated that I believe his artwork to be good and argued for why it could be seen as such, it is you who began degrading me and throwing insults.

And now you can't think of anything else other than "But they said..." and so you're trying to avoid the conversation all together. Pro-tip: If you didn't have such an ego that you had to have the last word, this conversation would have been ended long ago exactly like you wanted it.
#35 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
BASED UPON
THE FUCKING FACTS
OF THE PAINTINGS FLAWS
WHICH I HAVE LISTED FOR YOU
EXPLICITLY AND SPECIFICALLY
YOU FUCKING MORON
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
See, you literally have nothing else constructive to put into the argument, yet you still insist on having the last word. You're only proving my point.

Furthermore: 'Conspirators Mindset', everything has flaws when you look for them, as said, I could name many from just looking at the graduated pictures and I'm not even a professional critic. You did list them off, and I am thankful for that, but all I said was that even given those flaws I do not consider his paintings 'worse' than the awful paintings and sculptures shown below, it is you who, again, continues to sling insults, ad hominems, and generally act like a raging child.
User avatar #38 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
If I may interject. Hitler's paintings are and were nothing new, just landscapes and architecture. And the main issue with this is which needs to be taken into consideration is that his paintings aren't that outstanding compared to the many, many other paintings of landscapes and architecture. The reason and issue for why he was not accepted had nothing to do with lack of talent, but lack of expression and creativity. Art is a visual communications of ideas, which is something his paintings are lacking, they're less artworks than they are studies. BUT lets say he did something with them, something that made them stand out and more interesting,
take this piece for example. I say it's on par with Hitler's abilities, but what's different with this? It's use of brush stokes, the blend of blurred and finer detail, the stark vivid colours but most of all this painting achieves mood. People need to understand that art essentially has genres, and each genre produces different style and type. Simple doesn't mean bad, it's what is being communicated that matters first and foremost.
just to repeat, realistic landscapes and people is overdone as fuck and there needs to be more substance, originality and vaster use of conventions.

And yes, a red and black square on a wall in a gallery is bullshit and isn't true art in my eye.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Certainly.

Thank you very much for that very detailed and thought out response. I can see your point now, and while I still believe Hitler was a good artist as far as skill goes, I can see why some do not consider him a good artist and also why he wasn't accepted. I guess just so much of the art I've seen in recent years has been awful 'modern art' (which tends to be just a broom and a rock placed near eachother) that I have really come to respect and admire subtle artwork, landscapes, and proper diagrams. Whether it is a matter of opinion of just a breath of fresh air to me, I still like his art, but thank you very much for explaining why others do not. I have seen the light, you may rest knowing you have educated me, and I will always appreciate it.
#73 - verbavolant (11/13/2013) [-]
I really don't like you. dashgamer said in his very first post " so there was no "life" to his pictures." and you started to troll him, then foliap pretty much said the same thing to you (except more detailed) and now you're all "oh thanks man at least someone can educate me".
I agree with you tho, art is subjective and personal, and you may like it or not (I personally don't care about hitler's art whatsoever), but your attitude was really bad in this thread.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's fine, you don't have to. Although, I respectfully ask that if you are going to dislike me, dislike me on something that's actually true.

1. Indeed he did say that, and I said that I disagreed, purely on a matter of opinion.
2. I did not 'troll' anyone. Through-out then entire conversation I was calm, organized, and willing to listen to anything that actually had basis.
3. Indeed, however he also explained it better, used multiple examples, gave other explanations as to why, and actually talked about why it was a fact his work wasn't poplar, rather than just opinion.
4. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. First you say that it's a point against me because I 'troll', then you say it's a point against me because I am polite and appreciate someone else's input. If you're going to make a point, make it clear.
5. I fail to see how my attitude has been bad at all considering I wasn't the one slinging an insult with every comment, I wasn't the one swearing, I wasn't the one using all capitals, I wasn't the one being belligerent, and I wasn't the one who essentially said 'everyone who has a different opinion just has bad taste'.
User avatar #83 - lasmamoe (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm with you.
#40 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
pic to reflect on sorry
#20 - From what they said.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2013 on French +2
#21 - supertypicaluser (11/13/2013) [-]
Seems believable. Irish and alcohol.
#26 - Your anger and crudity only proves my point about your bias. I…  [+] (16 new replies) 11/13/2013 on I'd be mad too +1
User avatar #27 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I've got no anger.
I've got no bias that isn't unanimous with every single art critic in existence.
Do you not understand what "corroborated by the Art School of Vienna" means? It means that you are wrong.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's not what your words suggest.
Not every single critic agrees, though; standards change through-out time, and there's a reason that having an "Art Degree" is akin to being called the "best at being a retard".
I understand very well what it means, but you don't seem to understand that there is no official standard of 'creativity', and many who were considered great after their deaths were also considered awful in life, justifying their opinions in the exact same way you are now.
User avatar #29 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
If you're calling these poorly constructed facsimiles of buildings creative, then you truly have no clue what you're on about.
Discussion over, I've concluded that you're an idiot.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
My, my, don't you have a high opinion of yourself.

It's cute how you go on to judge Hitler about his poor outwork when his faces are FAR better sketched than the faces below, his paintings are far better than sculptures of...poles, and bodies far better than fat people with shading.

Oh yes, we can obviously see how far the opinion of Art Schools is worth.

P.S. You're still letting your anger and bias cloud your judgment.
User avatar #31 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I present facts about his paintings, listing the inconsistencies and the flaws, and you call it justification.
That's the equivalent of refuting the idea of a consistent rate of gravitational acceleration for all objects because 9.8 m/s is a "justification."
No, I don't have that high of an opinion of myself, I just have a low opinion of you. Fuck off, good day, harumph, bah humbug!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Would you like me to list the flaws of the other portraits and sculptures? I'm no critic, but I can name 6 off the top of my head.

No it's not, because that would be discussing something academic, while here we are discussing something based off of creativity. You can judge academia because there is a "right and wrong", but you can't say something is more "right or wrong" than something else on a subjective stand-point. Your example is just you desperately scratching at the bottom of the barrel to try and prove your point.

You do have a high opinion of yourself, evidence by the fact you believe YOU can call of the conversation despite the fact this is an equal one, YOU can 'conclude' something about me as if it were fact, and YOU believe you have a right to tell me to stop posting on content that isn't your own. Honestly, I could mention a million reasons why you being a brony is enough to give an awful opinion about you, but I don't judge you on that because it would be incredibly childish, kind of like how you're being now.
User avatar #33 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
You are wrong.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Holy shit, you have just been wrong this whole time. I'm not going to pander to your sense of self-righteousness any more by arguing the point, because you're so damned dumb that you refuse to even attempt to comprehend your wrongness.
I say again: fuck off.
User avatar #34 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Based upon what, exactly? Other than your insistence

I'm not self-righteous at all, I simply stated that I believe his artwork to be good and argued for why it could be seen as such, it is you who began degrading me and throwing insults.

And now you can't think of anything else other than "But they said..." and so you're trying to avoid the conversation all together. Pro-tip: If you didn't have such an ego that you had to have the last word, this conversation would have been ended long ago exactly like you wanted it.
#35 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
BASED UPON
THE FUCKING FACTS
OF THE PAINTINGS FLAWS
WHICH I HAVE LISTED FOR YOU
EXPLICITLY AND SPECIFICALLY
YOU FUCKING MORON
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
See, you literally have nothing else constructive to put into the argument, yet you still insist on having the last word. You're only proving my point.

Furthermore: 'Conspirators Mindset', everything has flaws when you look for them, as said, I could name many from just looking at the graduated pictures and I'm not even a professional critic. You did list them off, and I am thankful for that, but all I said was that even given those flaws I do not consider his paintings 'worse' than the awful paintings and sculptures shown below, it is you who, again, continues to sling insults, ad hominems, and generally act like a raging child.
User avatar #38 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
If I may interject. Hitler's paintings are and were nothing new, just landscapes and architecture. And the main issue with this is which needs to be taken into consideration is that his paintings aren't that outstanding compared to the many, many other paintings of landscapes and architecture. The reason and issue for why he was not accepted had nothing to do with lack of talent, but lack of expression and creativity. Art is a visual communications of ideas, which is something his paintings are lacking, they're less artworks than they are studies. BUT lets say he did something with them, something that made them stand out and more interesting,
take this piece for example. I say it's on par with Hitler's abilities, but what's different with this? It's use of brush stokes, the blend of blurred and finer detail, the stark vivid colours but most of all this painting achieves mood. People need to understand that art essentially has genres, and each genre produces different style and type. Simple doesn't mean bad, it's what is being communicated that matters first and foremost.
just to repeat, realistic landscapes and people is overdone as fuck and there needs to be more substance, originality and vaster use of conventions.

And yes, a red and black square on a wall in a gallery is bullshit and isn't true art in my eye.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Certainly.

Thank you very much for that very detailed and thought out response. I can see your point now, and while I still believe Hitler was a good artist as far as skill goes, I can see why some do not consider him a good artist and also why he wasn't accepted. I guess just so much of the art I've seen in recent years has been awful 'modern art' (which tends to be just a broom and a rock placed near eachother) that I have really come to respect and admire subtle artwork, landscapes, and proper diagrams. Whether it is a matter of opinion of just a breath of fresh air to me, I still like his art, but thank you very much for explaining why others do not. I have seen the light, you may rest knowing you have educated me, and I will always appreciate it.
#73 - verbavolant (11/13/2013) [-]
I really don't like you. dashgamer said in his very first post " so there was no "life" to his pictures." and you started to troll him, then foliap pretty much said the same thing to you (except more detailed) and now you're all "oh thanks man at least someone can educate me".
I agree with you tho, art is subjective and personal, and you may like it or not (I personally don't care about hitler's art whatsoever), but your attitude was really bad in this thread.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's fine, you don't have to. Although, I respectfully ask that if you are going to dislike me, dislike me on something that's actually true.

1. Indeed he did say that, and I said that I disagreed, purely on a matter of opinion.
2. I did not 'troll' anyone. Through-out then entire conversation I was calm, organized, and willing to listen to anything that actually had basis.
3. Indeed, however he also explained it better, used multiple examples, gave other explanations as to why, and actually talked about why it was a fact his work wasn't poplar, rather than just opinion.
4. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. First you say that it's a point against me because I 'troll', then you say it's a point against me because I am polite and appreciate someone else's input. If you're going to make a point, make it clear.
5. I fail to see how my attitude has been bad at all considering I wasn't the one slinging an insult with every comment, I wasn't the one swearing, I wasn't the one using all capitals, I wasn't the one being belligerent, and I wasn't the one who essentially said 'everyone who has a different opinion just has bad taste'.
User avatar #83 - lasmamoe (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm with you.
#40 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
pic to reflect on sorry
#18 - Fun Fact: Young people were actually very common in the Vietna…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/13/2013 on French +2
#19 - supertypicaluser (11/13/2013) [-]
Only the Irish.
User avatar #20 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
From what they said.
#21 - supertypicaluser (11/13/2013) [-]
Seems believable. Irish and alcohol.
#5 - Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Benders able to bend based…  [+] (22 new replies) 11/13/2013 on A stupid avatar post +42
#131 - mcswaggerjagger (11/13/2013) [-]
cprrect me if im wrong but arnt u a faggit
User avatar #89 - hoponthefeelstrain (11/13/2013) [-]
This is how I understand it... everyone has "chi" and if that chi is blocked, you are unable to bend. This is how Amon was able to take people's bending away (while only being a waterbender) and how the avatar can take chi away and how a lion turtle can give it to people.
#18 - mayoroftownsville (11/13/2013) [-]
Well, that's how it used to be before Korra shit all over the lore.
User avatar #23 - taokami (11/13/2013) [-]
Yep, Korra did shit on the lore.
#16 - restfullwicked (11/13/2013) [-]
there was something about all air nomads are benders because of their spirit world connection but i think its because Bumi isnt full nomad and is also not that spiritual a person.
#14 - cancer (11/13/2013) [-]
Anyone can become a bender if they search hard enough for a lion turtle.
User avatar #12 - theguywhofarted (11/13/2013) [-]
Tenzin showed that it doesn't matter how much you meditate, sometimes you are just unable to connect to the spirit world
#11 - ReoZennou (11/13/2013) [-]
No it's genetics. That's why only descendants of Aang will ever be air benders.
#21 - wishanonscouldpost (11/13/2013) [-]
Actually the avatar is based on spiritual stuff. There could be a air bending avatar born to air nomads.
User avatar #90 - hoponthefeelstrain (11/13/2013) [-]
Aang was the last air bender left. So all air benders will be his descendants.
#92 - wishanonscouldpost (11/13/2013) [-]
The person who becomes the avatar is not based on genetics it is based on spirit. The avatar can control all elements. That means the avatar could be born to air nomads and have their first bending skill as air.
User avatar #96 - hoponthefeelstrain (11/13/2013) [-]
Aang WAS the last air nomad, the fire nation went and killed them all off in hopes to prevent the avatar from becoming an air bender (the next in line after fire)
#97 - wishanonscouldpost (11/13/2013) [-]
There are non bending air nomads that live in the air temple that practice the same spiritual ways of previous air benders.
User avatar #107 - thefates (11/13/2013) [-]
You don't seem to understand, NOT JUST THE BENDERS WERE KILLED. The NOMADS as in their entire race of people were killed.
#109 - wishanonscouldpost (11/13/2013) [-]
In Legend of Korra air nomads live in the temples again. They took up the spiritual ways of the old nomads. The genetics do not matter in picking a avatar, only spirit matters.

Since the air nomads follow the same spiritual ways of the old nomads, it would be easy to conclude a air avatar could be born to a non bending air nomad.
#125 - othymer (11/13/2013) [-]
They are not air nomads though, they are actually air acolytes formed out of Aang's fan club.
#169 - wishanonscouldpost (11/14/2013) [-]
Really just a matter of naming. The air acolytes represented the air nation before Tenzin got on the council. They are pretty much the same as the air nomads besides them being non-benders. And air bending wasn't as big of a deal for air nomads as much as their ideology was.

Still point being that the air acolytes have the same ideology and spiritual knowledge as older air benders, so it would be possible for an avatar to be born to a non bending air acolyte.
User avatar #153 - kiermatv (11/13/2013) [-]
Somebody's been reading the comics
User avatar #6 - asasqw (11/13/2013) [-]
It seems to be a mixture of spirit bullshit and genetics. Everyone is capable but some people are born with the gene dormant.
User avatar #7 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's the one thing I always hated about Avatar (and it's the exact same reason I just can't take Harry Potter seriously). Mysticism shouldn't be 'genetic'. If you're connected to something spiritual and magical, it should be based on that connection alone.
#9 - missjaykay (11/13/2013) [-]
From what I make of it is like this: everyone in the world can draw. BUT some people are like, born with the talent to draw better then others.
Some times the really good draw--ers have kids who can draw really good liek, and sometimes with kids who can't really draw all to well. And vice versa with teh people who can't draw have kids who are the drawers.
That sound like something going on with the benders? It do to me
warning posting at 2am
User avatar #10 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
The time and your tiredness is no excuse for your awful English and sentence structure. I only forgive you because you helped me see the light.
#24 - It's easier to be a critic than to be a creator though, isn't …  [+] (18 new replies) 11/13/2013 on I'd be mad too +2
User avatar #25 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
His paintings aren't fit to adorn hotel walls. His landscapes are crap: the proportions, angles, and even shadows conflict with one another. The people in his panoramics are like crude caricatures. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of fact, corroborated by the Art School of Vienna and every other authority, that his paintings are eyesores not worth wiping your ass with.
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Your anger and crudity only proves my point about your bias. It's obvious he had talent, as looking at the pictures above they are much better painted and drawn then the artwork that was accepted. Regardless of any justifications you may have for it, they are only just that, justifications for what you believe to be correct.
User avatar #27 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I've got no anger.
I've got no bias that isn't unanimous with every single art critic in existence.
Do you not understand what "corroborated by the Art School of Vienna" means? It means that you are wrong.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's not what your words suggest.
Not every single critic agrees, though; standards change through-out time, and there's a reason that having an "Art Degree" is akin to being called the "best at being a retard".
I understand very well what it means, but you don't seem to understand that there is no official standard of 'creativity', and many who were considered great after their deaths were also considered awful in life, justifying their opinions in the exact same way you are now.
User avatar #29 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
If you're calling these poorly constructed facsimiles of buildings creative, then you truly have no clue what you're on about.
Discussion over, I've concluded that you're an idiot.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
My, my, don't you have a high opinion of yourself.

It's cute how you go on to judge Hitler about his poor outwork when his faces are FAR better sketched than the faces below, his paintings are far better than sculptures of...poles, and bodies far better than fat people with shading.

Oh yes, we can obviously see how far the opinion of Art Schools is worth.

P.S. You're still letting your anger and bias cloud your judgment.
User avatar #31 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I present facts about his paintings, listing the inconsistencies and the flaws, and you call it justification.
That's the equivalent of refuting the idea of a consistent rate of gravitational acceleration for all objects because 9.8 m/s is a "justification."
No, I don't have that high of an opinion of myself, I just have a low opinion of you. Fuck off, good day, harumph, bah humbug!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Would you like me to list the flaws of the other portraits and sculptures? I'm no critic, but I can name 6 off the top of my head.

No it's not, because that would be discussing something academic, while here we are discussing something based off of creativity. You can judge academia because there is a "right and wrong", but you can't say something is more "right or wrong" than something else on a subjective stand-point. Your example is just you desperately scratching at the bottom of the barrel to try and prove your point.

You do have a high opinion of yourself, evidence by the fact you believe YOU can call of the conversation despite the fact this is an equal one, YOU can 'conclude' something about me as if it were fact, and YOU believe you have a right to tell me to stop posting on content that isn't your own. Honestly, I could mention a million reasons why you being a brony is enough to give an awful opinion about you, but I don't judge you on that because it would be incredibly childish, kind of like how you're being now.
User avatar #33 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
You are wrong.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Holy shit, you have just been wrong this whole time. I'm not going to pander to your sense of self-righteousness any more by arguing the point, because you're so damned dumb that you refuse to even attempt to comprehend your wrongness.
I say again: fuck off.
User avatar #34 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Based upon what, exactly? Other than your insistence

I'm not self-righteous at all, I simply stated that I believe his artwork to be good and argued for why it could be seen as such, it is you who began degrading me and throwing insults.

And now you can't think of anything else other than "But they said..." and so you're trying to avoid the conversation all together. Pro-tip: If you didn't have such an ego that you had to have the last word, this conversation would have been ended long ago exactly like you wanted it.
#35 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
BASED UPON
THE FUCKING FACTS
OF THE PAINTINGS FLAWS
WHICH I HAVE LISTED FOR YOU
EXPLICITLY AND SPECIFICALLY
YOU FUCKING MORON
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
See, you literally have nothing else constructive to put into the argument, yet you still insist on having the last word. You're only proving my point.

Furthermore: 'Conspirators Mindset', everything has flaws when you look for them, as said, I could name many from just looking at the graduated pictures and I'm not even a professional critic. You did list them off, and I am thankful for that, but all I said was that even given those flaws I do not consider his paintings 'worse' than the awful paintings and sculptures shown below, it is you who, again, continues to sling insults, ad hominems, and generally act like a raging child.
User avatar #38 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
If I may interject. Hitler's paintings are and were nothing new, just landscapes and architecture. And the main issue with this is which needs to be taken into consideration is that his paintings aren't that outstanding compared to the many, many other paintings of landscapes and architecture. The reason and issue for why he was not accepted had nothing to do with lack of talent, but lack of expression and creativity. Art is a visual communications of ideas, which is something his paintings are lacking, they're less artworks than they are studies. BUT lets say he did something with them, something that made them stand out and more interesting,
take this piece for example. I say it's on par with Hitler's abilities, but what's different with this? It's use of brush stokes, the blend of blurred and finer detail, the stark vivid colours but most of all this painting achieves mood. People need to understand that art essentially has genres, and each genre produces different style and type. Simple doesn't mean bad, it's what is being communicated that matters first and foremost.
just to repeat, realistic landscapes and people is overdone as fuck and there needs to be more substance, originality and vaster use of conventions.

And yes, a red and black square on a wall in a gallery is bullshit and isn't true art in my eye.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Certainly.

Thank you very much for that very detailed and thought out response. I can see your point now, and while I still believe Hitler was a good artist as far as skill goes, I can see why some do not consider him a good artist and also why he wasn't accepted. I guess just so much of the art I've seen in recent years has been awful 'modern art' (which tends to be just a broom and a rock placed near eachother) that I have really come to respect and admire subtle artwork, landscapes, and proper diagrams. Whether it is a matter of opinion of just a breath of fresh air to me, I still like his art, but thank you very much for explaining why others do not. I have seen the light, you may rest knowing you have educated me, and I will always appreciate it.
#73 - verbavolant (11/13/2013) [-]
I really don't like you. dashgamer said in his very first post " so there was no "life" to his pictures." and you started to troll him, then foliap pretty much said the same thing to you (except more detailed) and now you're all "oh thanks man at least someone can educate me".
I agree with you tho, art is subjective and personal, and you may like it or not (I personally don't care about hitler's art whatsoever), but your attitude was really bad in this thread.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's fine, you don't have to. Although, I respectfully ask that if you are going to dislike me, dislike me on something that's actually true.

1. Indeed he did say that, and I said that I disagreed, purely on a matter of opinion.
2. I did not 'troll' anyone. Through-out then entire conversation I was calm, organized, and willing to listen to anything that actually had basis.
3. Indeed, however he also explained it better, used multiple examples, gave other explanations as to why, and actually talked about why it was a fact his work wasn't poplar, rather than just opinion.
4. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. First you say that it's a point against me because I 'troll', then you say it's a point against me because I am polite and appreciate someone else's input. If you're going to make a point, make it clear.
5. I fail to see how my attitude has been bad at all considering I wasn't the one slinging an insult with every comment, I wasn't the one swearing, I wasn't the one using all capitals, I wasn't the one being belligerent, and I wasn't the one who essentially said 'everyone who has a different opinion just has bad taste'.
User avatar #83 - lasmamoe (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm with you.
#40 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
pic to reflect on sorry
#16 - It was indeed quite common, even my own grandfather lied about…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/13/2013 on French 0
#17 - supertypicaluser (11/13/2013) [-]
Mine did too. He was 15 and all his mates were older and were able to go but he wasn't. I think I read up somewhere that the youngest person to go to war was 13.
User avatar #18 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Fun Fact: Young people were actually very common in the Vietnam war. As taken from diary's of soldiers, little Irish boys, most no older than 14, were hired specifically to go looking through the Vietcong tunnel networks armed with nothing but knives and drunk off rum. They were hired because they were short and quick enough to crawl through, given alcohol to make them braver, and a knife because it was quiet and a gun would only be harder to shoot in such tight spaces.
#19 - supertypicaluser (11/13/2013) [-]
Only the Irish.
User avatar #20 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
From what they said.
#21 - supertypicaluser (11/13/2013) [-]
Seems believable. Irish and alcohol.
#22 - His paintings of Landscapes, from what I've seen, were actuall…  [+] (30 new replies) 11/13/2013 on I'd be mad too +2
#56 - nebuchadnezzaurus (11/13/2013) [-]
I think it's time for a misquote from Mein Kempf
User avatar #58 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm not sure what you mean. In Mien Kampf (I haven't read it in a while, so bare with me here) I BELIEVE he said strictly that, that he first believed himself to be a born artist, but afterwards decided to devote himself to the people through politics. Is that not correct?
User avatar #61 - nebuchadnezzaurus (11/13/2013) [-]
I was referring to that time you said Hitler was not racist
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
You're still on about that, are you? If I didn't know better, I'd assume you were infatuated with me by your constant attempts at seeking me out.

In any case, to explain myself, I do not consider Hitler a racist, because, as I even showed YOU, he did not hate people based upon skin colour. He employed numerous different races of Nazi's, including Black, Jewish, and Homosexual Nazi's, and even gave some of them high praise and personal honours. What Hitler was is defined as "Anti-semetic", which (although the reason for it escapes me) is not the same as sheer Racism.
User avatar #64 - nebuchadnezzaurus (11/13/2013) [-]
You just like Hitler, don't you?
User avatar #65 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
So, you seek me out in order to try and sway favour away from my comments by involving previous comments that had nothing to do with the current subject, then when I tell you why you are incorrect in these statements and why my claims were justified, you completely ignore them and go straight to making me seem like the bad guy.

Cute.

As a matter of fact, yes I do like Hitler. I think he was a good person who tried to do his best for his people and just didn't quite know how to; I think if he had better advisers or judgement, he could have been one of the worlds greatest beneficiaries.

Than again, you already knew this, didn't you? Because I told you so before. You're only asking it here because you want me to admit it in order to be justified when you next insult me, or do anything else that would involve as little work as possible and you still coming out on top.
#71 - nebuchadnezzaurus (11/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm not mad or upset in the slightest, I am mearly pointing out facts.
User avatar #46 - mrevitcartta (11/13/2013) [-]
Vangogh didn't believe he should work? So that time he voluntarily worked coal mines was a lie? SMH
User avatar #47 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I didn't say he didn't believe he should work, all of them did menial jobs instead of starving, what I said was that they considered themselves artists above all else and found it improper or unpleasant to do anything else.
User avatar #23 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
No, you've just got no taste in art.
It doesn't matter that he was a tyrannical megalomaniac dictator, his "art" is absolute trash.
User avatar #24 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
It's easier to be a critic than to be a creator though, isn't it?

My taste in art is just fine, thank you very much for asking; I just think he painted wonderful landscapes. I personally think you're letting your own bias and opinion shape your view into a negative light, which is not something you should ever do; his art is art and many people today still enjoy it.
User avatar #25 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
His paintings aren't fit to adorn hotel walls. His landscapes are crap: the proportions, angles, and even shadows conflict with one another. The people in his panoramics are like crude caricatures. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of fact, corroborated by the Art School of Vienna and every other authority, that his paintings are eyesores not worth wiping your ass with.
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Your anger and crudity only proves my point about your bias. It's obvious he had talent, as looking at the pictures above they are much better painted and drawn then the artwork that was accepted. Regardless of any justifications you may have for it, they are only just that, justifications for what you believe to be correct.
User avatar #27 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I've got no anger.
I've got no bias that isn't unanimous with every single art critic in existence.
Do you not understand what "corroborated by the Art School of Vienna" means? It means that you are wrong.
User avatar #28 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's not what your words suggest.
Not every single critic agrees, though; standards change through-out time, and there's a reason that having an "Art Degree" is akin to being called the "best at being a retard".
I understand very well what it means, but you don't seem to understand that there is no official standard of 'creativity', and many who were considered great after their deaths were also considered awful in life, justifying their opinions in the exact same way you are now.
User avatar #29 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
If you're calling these poorly constructed facsimiles of buildings creative, then you truly have no clue what you're on about.
Discussion over, I've concluded that you're an idiot.
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
My, my, don't you have a high opinion of yourself.

It's cute how you go on to judge Hitler about his poor outwork when his faces are FAR better sketched than the faces below, his paintings are far better than sculptures of...poles, and bodies far better than fat people with shading.

Oh yes, we can obviously see how far the opinion of Art Schools is worth.

P.S. You're still letting your anger and bias cloud your judgment.
User avatar #31 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
I present facts about his paintings, listing the inconsistencies and the flaws, and you call it justification.
That's the equivalent of refuting the idea of a consistent rate of gravitational acceleration for all objects because 9.8 m/s is a "justification."
No, I don't have that high of an opinion of myself, I just have a low opinion of you. Fuck off, good day, harumph, bah humbug!
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Would you like me to list the flaws of the other portraits and sculptures? I'm no critic, but I can name 6 off the top of my head.

No it's not, because that would be discussing something academic, while here we are discussing something based off of creativity. You can judge academia because there is a "right and wrong", but you can't say something is more "right or wrong" than something else on a subjective stand-point. Your example is just you desperately scratching at the bottom of the barrel to try and prove your point.

You do have a high opinion of yourself, evidence by the fact you believe YOU can call of the conversation despite the fact this is an equal one, YOU can 'conclude' something about me as if it were fact, and YOU believe you have a right to tell me to stop posting on content that isn't your own. Honestly, I could mention a million reasons why you being a brony is enough to give an awful opinion about you, but I don't judge you on that because it would be incredibly childish, kind of like how you're being now.
User avatar #33 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
You are wrong.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Holy shit, you have just been wrong this whole time. I'm not going to pander to your sense of self-righteousness any more by arguing the point, because you're so damned dumb that you refuse to even attempt to comprehend your wrongness.
I say again: fuck off.
User avatar #34 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Based upon what, exactly? Other than your insistence

I'm not self-righteous at all, I simply stated that I believe his artwork to be good and argued for why it could be seen as such, it is you who began degrading me and throwing insults.

And now you can't think of anything else other than "But they said..." and so you're trying to avoid the conversation all together. Pro-tip: If you didn't have such an ego that you had to have the last word, this conversation would have been ended long ago exactly like you wanted it.
#35 - dashgamer (11/13/2013) [-]
BASED UPON
THE FUCKING FACTS
OF THE PAINTINGS FLAWS
WHICH I HAVE LISTED FOR YOU
EXPLICITLY AND SPECIFICALLY
YOU FUCKING MORON
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
See, you literally have nothing else constructive to put into the argument, yet you still insist on having the last word. You're only proving my point.

Furthermore: 'Conspirators Mindset', everything has flaws when you look for them, as said, I could name many from just looking at the graduated pictures and I'm not even a professional critic. You did list them off, and I am thankful for that, but all I said was that even given those flaws I do not consider his paintings 'worse' than the awful paintings and sculptures shown below, it is you who, again, continues to sling insults, ad hominems, and generally act like a raging child.
User avatar #38 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
If I may interject. Hitler's paintings are and were nothing new, just landscapes and architecture. And the main issue with this is which needs to be taken into consideration is that his paintings aren't that outstanding compared to the many, many other paintings of landscapes and architecture. The reason and issue for why he was not accepted had nothing to do with lack of talent, but lack of expression and creativity. Art is a visual communications of ideas, which is something his paintings are lacking, they're less artworks than they are studies. BUT lets say he did something with them, something that made them stand out and more interesting,
take this piece for example. I say it's on par with Hitler's abilities, but what's different with this? It's use of brush stokes, the blend of blurred and finer detail, the stark vivid colours but most of all this painting achieves mood. People need to understand that art essentially has genres, and each genre produces different style and type. Simple doesn't mean bad, it's what is being communicated that matters first and foremost.
just to repeat, realistic landscapes and people is overdone as fuck and there needs to be more substance, originality and vaster use of conventions.

And yes, a red and black square on a wall in a gallery is bullshit and isn't true art in my eye.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
Certainly.

Thank you very much for that very detailed and thought out response. I can see your point now, and while I still believe Hitler was a good artist as far as skill goes, I can see why some do not consider him a good artist and also why he wasn't accepted. I guess just so much of the art I've seen in recent years has been awful 'modern art' (which tends to be just a broom and a rock placed near eachother) that I have really come to respect and admire subtle artwork, landscapes, and proper diagrams. Whether it is a matter of opinion of just a breath of fresh air to me, I still like his art, but thank you very much for explaining why others do not. I have seen the light, you may rest knowing you have educated me, and I will always appreciate it.
#73 - verbavolant (11/13/2013) [-]
I really don't like you. dashgamer said in his very first post " so there was no "life" to his pictures." and you started to troll him, then foliap pretty much said the same thing to you (except more detailed) and now you're all "oh thanks man at least someone can educate me".
I agree with you tho, art is subjective and personal, and you may like it or not (I personally don't care about hitler's art whatsoever), but your attitude was really bad in this thread.
User avatar #77 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
That's fine, you don't have to. Although, I respectfully ask that if you are going to dislike me, dislike me on something that's actually true.

1. Indeed he did say that, and I said that I disagreed, purely on a matter of opinion.
2. I did not 'troll' anyone. Through-out then entire conversation I was calm, organized, and willing to listen to anything that actually had basis.
3. Indeed, however he also explained it better, used multiple examples, gave other explanations as to why, and actually talked about why it was a fact his work wasn't poplar, rather than just opinion.
4. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. First you say that it's a point against me because I 'troll', then you say it's a point against me because I am polite and appreciate someone else's input. If you're going to make a point, make it clear.
5. I fail to see how my attitude has been bad at all considering I wasn't the one slinging an insult with every comment, I wasn't the one swearing, I wasn't the one using all capitals, I wasn't the one being belligerent, and I wasn't the one who essentially said 'everyone who has a different opinion just has bad taste'.
User avatar #83 - lasmamoe (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm with you.
#40 - foliap (11/13/2013) [-]
pic to reflect on sorry
#51 - You actually don't 'bump'. There are two options to view comme…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2013 on The Canadian Empire +2
#52 - gerfox (11/13/2013) [-]
What I meant by bump is that you'll never hear anything from your comments after 24 hours, you'll get no replies. And this is two days later.
#7 - I don't always eat food in front of others, but when I do, I e… 11/13/2013 on (untitled) 0
#40 - He has, but that's why I say it's a subconscious desire, becau…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2013 on Mothafukken Deadpool +3
#135 - worried (11/13/2013) [-]
but when he was trying to kill himself, he had thanos' immortality.... death (the character) has a lady-boner for deadpool and thanos is a massive cockblocker... like one of those fat chicks at the club that doesnt let her hot friend bone simply because scientist try to figure out how whales sprouted legs and began to walk.... at the time, deadpool couldn't die if he wanted to because he wanted to be with death and her boobies!!! so technically it was a curse... later on he found a way to get rid of the thanos immortality but the writers said "fuck this" and kept him as a real immortal because hes the fucking deadpool what do you do in a deadpool? the deathstroke hue
#13 - I once knew a guy who absolutely hated puns. He hated them to …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2013 on bred man 0
User avatar #14 - tomahawkit (11/13/2013) [-]
I guess you could say he really morns puns existence
#31 - I'm actually not privy to many of the comics, but if the comme…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/13/2013 on Mothafukken Deadpool +2
#32 - thatonecommunist (11/13/2013) [-]
Oh.

I'm not up to date

Why would they remove the best part of his character? thats kind of dumb, but whatever.
#43 - senorfrog (11/13/2013) [-]
Technically they didn't. The writers literally forgot about it (mostly Way....fuck way)
User avatar #166 - nigeltheoutlaw (11/13/2013) [-]
I've noticed that cape authors forget about stuff a lot in comics.
User avatar #145 - wizardfist (11/13/2013) [-]
that sucks, i mean, this was one of the saddest storys ever. knowing that he was cursed andn can not die made the deadpool game so incredibly sad....
#19 - I was eating when I read this comment... 11/13/2013 on Girls don't fart +36
#26 - Actually, Deadpool can die, and quite easily as well. …  [+] (14 new replies) 11/13/2013 on Mothafukken Deadpool +141
User avatar #216 - sovietghost (11/13/2013) [-]
so technically you only kill him while he is on depression?
never, unless he is at high school again
User avatar #182 - AztecJew (11/13/2013) [-]
would you happen to know which comic that happens in?
User avatar #228 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm afraid not, good sir.
#37 - iamnuff (11/13/2013) [-]
pretty sure he's tried to kill himself multiple times.

he regens even when he doesn't want to.
User avatar #40 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
He has, but that's why I say it's a subconscious desire, because he considers himself a 'trash-man', and there's always a job that he has to do.
#135 - worried (11/13/2013) [-]
but when he was trying to kill himself, he had thanos' immortality.... death (the character) has a lady-boner for deadpool and thanos is a massive cockblocker... like one of those fat chicks at the club that doesnt let her hot friend bone simply because scientist try to figure out how whales sprouted legs and began to walk.... at the time, deadpool couldn't die if he wanted to because he wanted to be with death and her boobies!!! so technically it was a curse... later on he found a way to get rid of the thanos immortality but the writers said "fuck this" and kept him as a real immortal because hes the fucking deadpool what do you do in a deadpool? the deathstroke hue
#29 - thatonecommunist (11/13/2013) [-]
"Death, the personification of death and the grim reaper, is in love with Deadpool because she cannot have his soul due to him not being able to die. Deadpool reciprocates his love for her and so tries to figure out ways for him to lose his healing ability, die and be with his beloved. Thanos, jealous because he understood Death prefered Deadpool's love over his, cursed Deadpool with immortality so they couldn't be together. "

deadpool.wikia.com/wiki/Death
User avatar #88 - burningsmurfs (11/13/2013) [-]
I read the exact same thing about Wolverine, weird. I can't recall from what though.
#68 - anonymous (11/13/2013) [-]
It's like high school drama all over again.
User avatar #31 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I'm actually not privy to many of the comics, but if the comments around here are anything to take for fact, he's since lost his "Thanos Immortality'.
#32 - thatonecommunist (11/13/2013) [-]
Oh.

I'm not up to date

Why would they remove the best part of his character? thats kind of dumb, but whatever.
#43 - senorfrog (11/13/2013) [-]
Technically they didn't. The writers literally forgot about it (mostly Way....fuck way)
User avatar #166 - nigeltheoutlaw (11/13/2013) [-]
I've noticed that cape authors forget about stuff a lot in comics.
User avatar #145 - wizardfist (11/13/2013) [-]
that sucks, i mean, this was one of the saddest storys ever. knowing that he was cursed andn can not die made the deadpool game so incredibly sad....
#25 - I personally don't like the Hulk, because he actually is a Mar… 11/13/2013 on Mothafukken Deadpool 0
#24 - It's actually really because of his Healing Factor. He can onl… 11/13/2013 on Mothafukken Deadpool 0
#23 - Technically he's not a Mary Sue, but I can see why you say that. 11/13/2013 on Mothafukken Deadpool 0
#13 - And ten years later she's gonna think he's the cutest guy ever…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/13/2013 on Girls don't fart +223
User avatar #68 - xentacle (11/13/2013) [-]
Or the girl will blossom into a beautiful young lady, and the guy will be a beta, forever fapping over that situation.
User avatar #16 - newfeliperuiz (11/13/2013) [-]
What if that's his thing?
User avatar #19 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I was eating when I read this comment...
#4 - I once sent 10 punts into a pun contest to see if they'd win …  [+] (3 new replies) 11/13/2013 on bred man +2
User avatar #12 - tomahawkit (11/13/2013) [-]
pics or it didn't napkin


now that's a bad pun, for shore
User avatar #13 - captainfuckitall (11/13/2013) [-]
I once knew a guy who absolutely hated puns. He hated them to such a degree that he would actually get aggravated, belligerent, and just run away whenever he heard someone even mention them (that is, if he didn't punch the joker in the face).

Apparently it was because all his life his brother would wake him up with puns. Nothing else, he would just tell him puns until he woke up, and even after that all through the morning.

There's no joke here. That's just who he was.
User avatar #14 - tomahawkit (11/13/2013) [-]
I guess you could say he really morns puns existence
#9 - What the hell are you doing here? It's been close to a year si…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2013 on You... FUCKING CUNT! 0
User avatar #10 - mangobutt (11/13/2013) [-]
It was a related post to one of the posts I was looking at.
#158 - You don't seem to understand what I was saying. I wasn't sayin… 11/12/2013 on you know you want to 0

Comments(481):

[ 481 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - anonymous (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
[ 481 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)