x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9552
Comment Ranking:#626
Highest Content Rank:#9533
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 58204 total,  71193 ,  12989
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 75.7% (757/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10866
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16672
FJ Points:24989

latest user's comments

#12 - >Implying 06/02/2014 on Supervillain Origins: Magneto +2
#7 - I for one support Magneto, I really do. It is completely withi…  [+] (21 new replies) 06/02/2014 on Supervillain Origins: Magneto +34
User avatar #35 - vortexrain (06/02/2014) [-]
I agree with you on everything except you saying that because he has the power to do something, it's his right to do it. Might does not equal right. Thinking like that leads to dictatorships.
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
If might does not make right, tell me, what does?

Even to the religious man, his god is only right because he is mighty
User avatar #37 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
Is what Kim what's his fuck in the right just because he has the power to do so?
User avatar #38 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
Absolutely, and those more powerful than HIM are in the right should they so choose to stop him.

When you have the power to do something, it is completely up to you how you do it; whether you work to save the world or destroy it, either one is fine because it is only a measurement of your own power and skill, and likewise, the power and skill of whoever stops you.

If you and another person fought, it would be your RIGHT as victor to impose any will of yours upon the loser, from taking him as a slave to taking his belongings to taking his life, or you could just as easily let him go. If he did not want to be subjected to these conditions he should have worked harder to win.
User avatar #39 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
If they don't have the capabilities with which to win, then it's their fault if they lose? That's a ridiculous argument. If a one-legged man gets forced into a race with Usain Bolt, and loses, it's his if he loses?
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
Of course not, and it's for the same reason that you should not force yourself upon children, because neither is fully capable, and to fight someone you KNOW will lose against you is an admission of your own weakness, and the weak should not be given a single inch (although there is a difference between attacking someone and defending yourself from someone).

Basically, this philosophy extends so that you can make or stake any type of claim you like. If people do not like it, they can challenge your claim, and the winner gets their way. However, you should only make a claim over something that's worth the effort. If I were the second strongest man in the world, I could not go up to a handicapped person and say "Your lunch money is mine now" because I wouldn't 'earn' it if I had one, because they CANNOT defend themselves. However, I CAN go up to the strongest man in the world and say that exact thing, because they CAN defend themselves, and the winner gets the lunch money.

You see?
User avatar #43 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
It seems to me that you're kinda contradicting yourself.
User avatar #44 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
Instead of stating it, explain how.
User avatar #45 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
Clarify something first. Would it not be your right as the second strongest man in the world to take the handicapped persons money? According to you, at least.
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
Yes and no. Saying "I'm going to take your money" to a handicapped person and "I want everybody's money" to the world are two different things (obvious reasons aside).

In the first, I'm saying it because I KNOW they can't resist, but in the latter, there are plenty of people who are ABLE to resist and, should they so choose, a fight takes place and the victor gets his way.

I guess you can compare it to the Usian Bolt deliberately challenging a physically disabled person to a race and the Usian Bolt saying "I am the fastest man in the world. Anyone who disagrees is free to try and prove me wrong"
User avatar #47 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
Do you think that have the ability to do something, I should? Just because Kim what's his fuck has the power to do what he does, he should?
User avatar #48 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
No, but I do believe that if you have the ability to do something, it is completely up to you what you do with it.

If you do not like what he's doing to his people, why not earn money and try to rally up an army yourself? There are plenty of people who have no lives who would love to go out in a blaze of glory being remembered as heroes, and I'm sure your little rag-tag group could work up the money to fund an assassination attempt.

That's what I mean. If you're ABLE to, nobody but you should dictate what you do with your actions, and if you do not like how someone uses their abilities, it is within your right to test YOURS against theirs, with the winner gaining the spoils (whatever that might be).

Is it starting to make a bit more sense now? I know I probably sounded like edgemaster2000 in that first post, but I really do believe there is merit to my philosophy
User avatar #49 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
Yeah, now you're making sense. How bro, I got a little operation you might want in on. It involves you, me, and a few other unidentified persons. It does require an entrance fee of about half of million dollars. You get to take a trip to North Korea, and learn how to operate an assault rifle.
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
No, no, no, that's not how you garner support!

What you do is you go to people who are depressed, who are pessimistic, the downtrodden and miserable, the people who believe that nothing is going for them (and more-so, nothing is going for the world) and you agree with them, and tell them that you want to do something about it. Show them plans you have, real things you've made and set up, tangible pieces of evidence that you are working on something like bringing down a dictatorship, and just tell them you need a few more pieces. They are welcome to join you, and that they must be willing to sacrifice everything to bring about a better world, even their life (and also their money, of course).

Then once you got enough people to support your funding you just train for a bit, learn the language, buy the supplies and rent the boat and start making your way. Even if you don't bring it down, you can still devote your time to educating the people, inspiring an uprising, or freeing slaves.
User avatar #51 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
Dude, it was a joke.
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
Dude, I know. You just seemed to think that my idea was achievable, so I'm telling you how it can be attained. If you do not like something, do not complain, work to change it
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
*UNachievable
User avatar #40 - vortexrain (06/03/2014) [-]
I forgot to add fault in there, my bad.
User avatar #42 - captainfuckitall (06/03/2014) [-]
All is K
User avatar #9 - makomirocket (06/02/2014) [-]
I agree, i cut that from my personal view as it was getting way to long, however at least mutants are actually superior
#12 - captainfuckitall (06/02/2014) [-]
>Implying
#30 - For those who don't get it, here's a quick rundown of what eac… 06/02/2014 on these make me happy +2
#6 - >Tfw you play Skyrim with graphics mods and your computer explodes  [+] (2 new replies) 06/02/2014 on Sad trooper +3
User avatar #26 - shinote (06/02/2014) [-]
>TFW you have a graphics card that is actually worth a shit & says "is it in yet?" when playing skyrim
User avatar #14 - remsaman (06/02/2014) [-]
>TFW you cant run graphics mods because you have a console.
#3 - Is that Carlton?  [+] (1 new reply) 06/02/2014 on Average day in Liberty City +1
User avatar #15 - mikoli (06/02/2014) [-]
no it's luis from GTA TBoGT
#3 - RACEMIXING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  [+] (1 new reply) 06/01/2014 on The Human Concept of "Love" 0
User avatar #7 - jacksowrd (06/03/2014) [-]
Species-mixing*
#8 - She is a full grown woman. She can accept the consequences for… 06/01/2014 on Bitch +12
#67 - Wouldn't dubs technically be a 1 in 20 chance?  [+] (1 new reply) 06/01/2014 on God pepsi 0
User avatar #68 - adu (06/01/2014) [-]
00-99 represents 100 total combinations.
There are ten instances of dubs: 00, 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, 99
Chance is 1 in 10
#8 - I beg someone to photoshop the face onto his reaction 06/01/2014 on My favorite gif of all time +2
#79 - Hm, I understand what you mean. Haha, of course we co…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! 0
#84 - kingpongthedon (05/31/2014) [-]
Well yeah, but the entire point of law is to make sure our behavior is not in conflict with society's ideals which means taking away certain freedoms from time to time. That's literally the entire point of governance. There are certain issues that are so universally agreed upon that it's not really taking away anything from anybody by banning it, and necrophilia is one of them. Most people don't want their dead butt-holes rammed, especially by somebody who gets off to corpses. In return, we give up the right to ram dead butt-holes. In our society, we believe the right to not have your dead butt-hole rammed is more important than your right to ram dead butt-holes and thus designed legislation reflecting that belief.

Laws aren't meant to give an answer as to what is and is not okay, they are a reflection of what we believe is and is not okay. All laws impede our ability to decide for ourselves, but there are instances where what's gained far exceeds what's lost. The point of any legislative body is to find a balance between these two sides.
#73 - I'm not trolling. Did you even read my whole comment? … 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! 0
#46 - Because I don't exactly want to see people digging up my moms …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! +1
User avatar #143 - therebemoose (06/01/2014) [-]
The limit is yours to make, in all actuality.Nobody is saying you have to have sex with a person/thing since somebody else does.
#38 - You misunderstand, friend. I wasn't saying Homosexuality is ba… 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! +1
#37 - Indeed you are correct, sir! But one could argue that the righ…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! +5
User avatar #142 - DANEATSfatKIDS (06/01/2014) [-]
Children are not developed to the point of emotionally understanding "consent". Everything is situation to situation that's why I said nothing is linear. The point is that you can not quantify how much you hurt someone so you should do nothing that can hurt someone. That means that you shouldn't say something to someone that will do more harm than good like telling someone they will never succeed in life. Someone else choosing to take offense to what you say or do is something that is a problem with then and not with you. With the utmost civility they should tell you why they had a problem and with the utmost civility you should reply and understand what they say regardless of if you agree with them. That does not entitle coming to blows. You cannot be traumatized by the idea of something, trauma is based off of experiences in ones personal lives. People can be taught that certain things are wrong or even evil, which is also wrong, if people do not come to the conclusion themselves they are not actually being traumatized by the concept or idea but instead by the person telling them they have no choice but to hate the concept or idea. Ideas are things we should find ourselves when other people force them into us instead of opening our minds to it and allowing us to come to our own conclusions ourselves.
of course no ideology is completely without flaws. For instance my ideology rejects in many ways many people's religious beliefs which they would consider a flaw.
#36 - But there we go. Does that justify Necrophilia and Pedophilia …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! 0
User avatar #87 - promor (05/31/2014) [-]
now I'm not sure a child has the ability to make such a decision rationally, however a child anatomy isn't typically developed enough to handle intercourse with-ought injury, and were a young child to get pregnant the child probably wouldn't survive, so there's that. as far as necrophilia goes, you really can't have sex with someones dead relative with ought them having some kind of emotional scarring, in a very roundabout way it's like destroying or degrading someones property.
#24 - This is actually a very good argument against Homosexuality. …  [+] (25 new replies) 05/31/2014 on ITS HAPPENING!! -10
User avatar #90 - Sethorein (05/31/2014) [-]
Slippery slope fallacy. 10% of the population is gay that cannot be said for pedophiles and zoophiles . There is no issue of intellectual disparity between the two partners. There is so much different between fucking dead things, children, and animals than there is between fucking someone with the same plumbing as you.
User avatar #85 - Ruspanic (05/31/2014) [-]
The slippery slope is a valid concern, but it's NOT a good argument against the acceptance of homosexuality. Judge these things by their own merits.
#75 - kingpongthedon (05/31/2014) [-]
Atheist here, and I do feel an obligation to respect the dead. People still have an emotional attachment to the body even if the owner of the body is no longer with us. It's the same reason we don't just dump everybody's stuff the second they die. Even if the person is no longer with us, there's still people who care about it. But still, even if there's nobody left that cares about the body I still believe that person should have the final say as to what happens to their possessions, the body being the most personal possession.

But back to your point, unless there is consent and all parties involved are in a state where they can make that decision responsibly, it's absolutely not cool. Kids, animals, and intoxicated people can't make that decision with a proper understanding of the situation. For the most part, the dead can't either. Even if they give consent while alive to dead sex, consent still needs to be given prior to each sexual encounter. We don't know that the person wouldn't have changed their mind if given the opportunity. I think it's best to just play it safe and go ahead and say no fucking the dead.
User avatar #79 - captainfuckitall (05/31/2014) [-]
Hm, I understand what you mean.

Haha, of course we could all say that, but one could argue that it interferes with personal freedom to make decisions for yourself, no?
#84 - kingpongthedon (05/31/2014) [-]
Well yeah, but the entire point of law is to make sure our behavior is not in conflict with society's ideals which means taking away certain freedoms from time to time. That's literally the entire point of governance. There are certain issues that are so universally agreed upon that it's not really taking away anything from anybody by banning it, and necrophilia is one of them. Most people don't want their dead butt-holes rammed, especially by somebody who gets off to corpses. In return, we give up the right to ram dead butt-holes. In our society, we believe the right to not have your dead butt-hole rammed is more important than your right to ram dead butt-holes and thus designed legislation reflecting that belief.

Laws aren't meant to give an answer as to what is and is not okay, they are a reflection of what we believe is and is not okay. All laws impede our ability to decide for ourselves, but there are instances where what's gained far exceeds what's lost. The point of any legislative body is to find a balance between these two sides.
#63 - justanotherblablab (05/31/2014) [-]
Two consenting adults having sex isn't the same as a adult and a child having sex. Are you trolling?
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (05/31/2014) [-]
I'm not trolling. Did you even read my whole comment?

What if the child consents? "It's just a child!"
Are you saying that you have never met a young person you would consider wiser or more mature than an older person?
User avatar #42 - therebemoose (05/31/2014) [-]
You are asking the wrong question. You are better asking and then answering: WHY should we set the limit? Most of the time the buck stops at "but gays are ick, see Bible page x."
User avatar #46 - captainfuckitall (05/31/2014) [-]
Because I don't exactly want to see people digging up my moms corpse to fuck it. That's why. I'm just wondering exactly where this limit is.
User avatar #143 - therebemoose (06/01/2014) [-]
The limit is yours to make, in all actuality.Nobody is saying you have to have sex with a person/thing since somebody else does.
User avatar #34 - DANEATSfatKIDS (05/31/2014) [-]
Whenever you ask yourself "where to set the limit" a working system is almost always applicable. People should have the freedom to do whatever they want as long as what they do infringes on no one else's basic human rights and all other parties understand what is happening. So for instance, bestiality can never be legal because there is no real way to confirm an animals understanding or willingness of the situation on a human level. Pedophilia is illegal because it infringes on people's rights to not be traumatized and can be considered torture. Necrophilia will never be legal because there is no clear line of consent or willingness (although if someone sees the body as a tool of masturbation then that is another thing, however that could be infringing on the rights of the family, also if the person gave you permission to have sex with their body before death that would make sense as well, i personally know its messed up but i do not have a huge moral problem with necrophilia. I just think it's gross)
This argument can be used elsewhere as well
for instance, marijuana legalization
Legalization of marijuana (though i disagree with smoking pot) should be legal because it does not directly result in something that kills commonly
however drugs like, heroine, cocaine, and meth should be completely illegal to manufacture in any way or to sell in any way because they are things that very often lead to death. A side effect of using them is death or harm. (on could say that driving a car can be deadly too but i would argue that a side effect of using a car is traveling distance and that people die when using vending machines so there's an example of that kind of a process.) These drugs should be allowed to be used yes but they should in no way be allowed to be manufactured or processed at all. If someone can get a hold of them good for them but if they make them they have the possibility of harming others and thus should remain illegal
tldr; things arent linear. __
#51 - anonymous (05/31/2014) [-]
So incest is cool too? Just sayan...
User avatar #80 - fishandkids (05/31/2014) [-]
I do not have a problem with incest as long as it is preformed by two adults, both are willing to do it and they do not try to have a biological baby.
#97 - anonymous (05/31/2014) [-]
dat moment when the time comes when someone says "hey, you're saying it as if it's a bad thing to be a motherfucker"...
motherfucker!
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (05/31/2014) [-]
Indeed you are correct, sir! But one could argue that the right to freedom is more important than the right to safety. Just as well, one could also argue that the right for you to feel pleasure is more important than the right for a body to not be seen desecrated (which makes as much sense as "Nobody can fuck the table". Neither are sentient). And finally, what if a child consents or wants to have sex with an adult, but another child IS, in fact, traumatized by the thought of homosexuality?

I agree with you completely. "Do what you want so long as you do not harm property or others", but how can you quantify exactly how MUCH you "harm" others? I mean, that way, one could argue that free speech should be banned because any unorthodox thoughts may hurt the feelings of another MORE than it would hurt you not to speak it.
User avatar #142 - DANEATSfatKIDS (06/01/2014) [-]
Children are not developed to the point of emotionally understanding "consent". Everything is situation to situation that's why I said nothing is linear. The point is that you can not quantify how much you hurt someone so you should do nothing that can hurt someone. That means that you shouldn't say something to someone that will do more harm than good like telling someone they will never succeed in life. Someone else choosing to take offense to what you say or do is something that is a problem with then and not with you. With the utmost civility they should tell you why they had a problem and with the utmost civility you should reply and understand what they say regardless of if you agree with them. That does not entitle coming to blows. You cannot be traumatized by the idea of something, trauma is based off of experiences in ones personal lives. People can be taught that certain things are wrong or even evil, which is also wrong, if people do not come to the conclusion themselves they are not actually being traumatized by the concept or idea but instead by the person telling them they have no choice but to hate the concept or idea. Ideas are things we should find ourselves when other people force them into us instead of opening our minds to it and allowing us to come to our own conclusions ourselves.
of course no ideology is completely without flaws. For instance my ideology rejects in many ways many people's religious beliefs which they would consider a flaw.
#35 - seymion (05/31/2014) [-]
This makes up for all the fucked up shit I've read on the internet today, thank you.
#39 - anonymous (05/31/2014) [-]
gay activists want to lower the age of consent to 12 in the UK...have a nice day
#33 - serotonin (05/31/2014) [-]
We set the limit on your face and then punch it until it breaks
I dont really mean this it just sounded as apropriate internet/funny junk comment. Now whent that is done... in certan aspects I agree with you. Just because something is natural doesnt mean it is good. Cancer, diabities, psychopathy, tofu - they are all natural.
User avatar #38 - captainfuckitall (05/31/2014) [-]
You misunderstand, friend. I wasn't saying Homosexuality is bad, what I'm saying is "I was born this way and should act on it!" IS a slippery slope because it can lead to many other actions that are justified using the same logic.
User avatar #32 - promor (05/31/2014) [-]
Fuck limits, do whatever you want with your life as long as your not hurting someone else, it's none of mine or anyone else's business.
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (05/31/2014) [-]
But there we go. Does that justify Necrophilia and Pedophilia as well? (Provided the child consents and wants it)
User avatar #87 - promor (05/31/2014) [-]
now I'm not sure a child has the ability to make such a decision rationally, however a child anatomy isn't typically developed enough to handle intercourse with-ought injury, and were a young child to get pregnant the child probably wouldn't survive, so there's that. as far as necrophilia goes, you really can't have sex with someones dead relative with ought them having some kind of emotional scarring, in a very roundabout way it's like destroying or degrading someones property.
#26 - anonymous (05/31/2014) [-]
I couldn't give less of a shit about some faggots fucking animals, but i think the reason pedophilia is against the law is because it traumatizes the children for life, and for necrophilia the families of the dead guy you're fucking is probably gonna get really mad and put a bullet in your brain.
User avatar #30 - pwnaged (05/31/2014) [-]
Then someone gets to fuck YOUR corpse.
#10 - That'll make twice that you've let him in your back door.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/30/2014 on Good old times +1
User avatar #11 - redbrutal (05/30/2014) [-]
"twice"
#14 - Women think the joke is that everything makes your balls hurt … 05/29/2014 on when do your balls hurt? +6
#3 - >Fascism being worse than Communism ISHYGDDT 05/28/2014 on Understanding the government 0
#30 - Anyone know where this is from?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/28/2014 on Tylosaurus' daily life 0
User avatar #36 - ANONpirate (05/28/2014) [-]
pretty decent doujinshi, story summary is "dude has rare disease, gonna change into a girl overnight, last day with a dick, decides to follow through on a bucket list by cross-dressing and wanking it like a machine with strange objects shoved up his ass"

if you want to read it for yourself, look here. www.hbrowse.com/11795/c00001
#2 - This is exactly like something a 13 year old would write. 05/27/2014 on Dating a scientist +5
#9 - I don't think she took that picture because she wanted people …  [+] (3 new replies) 05/26/2014 on I am a terrible person +139
User avatar #55 - peyko (05/26/2014) [-]
What face?
User avatar #56 - peyko (05/26/2014) [-]
All i see is tits.
#50 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
What do you expect? OP enjoys the company of gentlemen men.
#5 - "That is offensive, you can't be saying that on the stree… 05/26/2014 on Fuck the poor 0
#10 - Actually, technological and scientific advancements gained dur…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/25/2014 on interesting +1
User avatar #13 - whateverdude (05/25/2014) [-]
Aww man, I was gonna say that... Ah well compliments to you good sir!
#3 - I don't even NEED glasses and I thought it was a chicken breast  [+] (1 new reply) 05/25/2014 on Not Wearing My Glasses +62
User avatar #11 - thebaseballexpert (05/25/2014) [-]
then I think you need to get to an optometrist STAT

Comments(507):

[ 507 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#515 - mcburd ONLINE (02/20/2015) [-]
#513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - anonymous (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 507 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)