Upload
Login or register

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Stats
Comment Ranking:#1592
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 80378 total,  98570 ,  18192
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 32.9% (329/1000)
Level 369 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 370 Comments: Immortal
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10934
Total Comments Made:21166
FJ Points:41146

latest user's comments

#20 - >Going anywhere in the Souls games without nigh maxed healt…  [+] (1 reply) 04/16/2016 on Death - The Game +13
User avatar
#142 - ZenMacros (04/16/2016) [-]
Why would I play a Souls game if I didn't want to die?
#29 - I still say Demon's Souls has been the most difficult Souls ga…  [+] (10 replies) 04/16/2016 on what dark souls 3 feels like 0
User avatar
#40 - asasqw (04/16/2016) [-]
It is harder in general, but can be broken much easier and way harder
User avatar
#36 - killjoyus (04/16/2016) [-]
I mean i have to disagree, Demons is the easiest by a far and large margin. aside from Dorian and maybe one other boss they are all fairly simple gimmick bosses that can be beaten quick enough.
User avatar
#37 - captainfuckitall (04/16/2016) [-]
A game isn't made difficult just for the bosses. It's about the areas and the average creatures you fight along the way. Besides, frankly speaking, the general 'hit, dodge, hit' tactic of the Souls games plays very well for most bosses. The REASON they are bosses is for unique aspects, which Demon's Souls has far more, in my opinion. For every neat boss Dark Souls has, it has the regular 'attack, lumber around, attack, lumber around, maybe jump' boss, while every Boss in Demon's Souls has a unique form of fighting and defeat.
User avatar
#42 - killjoyus (04/16/2016) [-]
sure its not solely the bosses, but you'd be remiss to say that any zone in demons is harder than shrine of amana or blight town or a multitude of others. Like Demons is fun but its hard to say its harder than dark souls, like not only does demons offer a larger selection of hugely OP weapons but also the bosses are pretty easy, because yeah they are unique but the reason so many dark bosses are "attack, dodge, attack" is because its a simple pattern that can be made hard to deal with. its simplicity is its strength
User avatar
#44 - captainfuckitall (04/16/2016) [-]
Shrine of Amana? Blight Town is mostly treacherous because of the toxins and pitfalls. Rickety bridges and environments that look entirely the same don't help any. Even the tower of Latria which was built to be full of doom falls has still enough will room or you to adjust and parry and dodge.

How can you say ANY game has a large selection of OP weapons when Dark Souls literally has a build designed around stunlocks, weapons that scale with humanity (which you can get 99 of through grinding far quicker than you can level up), and Pyromancy which you can get (and upgrade to Ascended+5) as early as Soul level 1? Come on now. People brag all the time about being able to breeze through the entire game with a single powered up weapon. The only weapon I can think that does anything similar is The Northern Regent blade, which is fitting considering it requires the final boss soul and both boss weapons.
User avatar
#45 - killjoyus (04/16/2016) [-]
i really think you are being close minded about this. like really you can only think of one OP weapon from demons? really? how about the dragon bone smasher, white bow, uchi, Miridan hammer, estoc, Kliji, all of these were super godamned op and many more were great as killing most bosses. yea sure pyromancy and humanity weapons were OP but the scaling stopped at 10 humanity, so it didn't matter if you had 99, and it was 1 upgrade path. and pyro was great but was nothing compared to the super easy mode magic of demons

Also Shrine of amana was the BS underground lake place in Dark souls 2, was super difficult and BS.
User avatar
#46 - captainfuckitall (04/16/2016) [-]
If you're really going to count weapons like that, then I'd like to note that many people do runs of just beating something to death with their fists.

Every one of those weapons are only good if you have the proper scaling and/or they're upgraded.

Magic was a glass cannon and everyone knew it. You had technically fewer spell slots to work with, less mana (relatively. No damn way you're getting 30 soul arrow shots out of a royal class as you would with a Sorcerer in Dark Souls), and replenishing mana was harder to do unless you were willing to invest tons into luck or were willing to dick around for a half an hour while it replenished due to rings/enchantments.
User avatar
#47 - killjoyus (04/16/2016) [-]
all im hearing now is excuses and non arguments. one what do fists runs mean, if anything it invalidates your whole argument about weapons. second no weapon is good if you don't have the stats or scaling set up for it. like in every game you have to have the right stats to use a weapon
while slots and uses were fewer the spells were stronger, much stronger, and the fact that it was a bar made it more OP as the bar could be upgraded adding more casts.
User avatar
#48 - captainfuckitall (04/16/2016) [-]
Okay. You already decided what you want to hear and know, as have I. There is no point in continuing. Have a wonderful evening.
User avatar
#49 - killjoyus (04/16/2016) [-]
ok, fair enough.
#26 - The difference is that Superman is SUPPOSED to be. Batman is j…  [+] (2 replies) 04/15/2016 on Lobo has balls +14
#36 - anon (04/15/2016) [-]
that didn't make any sense

"character is boring because plot armour, but plot armour is good if a character is SUPPOSED to have plot armour, unlike batman, who was written to have plot armour"

this is why they reach reading comprehension
User avatar
#39 - captainfuckitall (04/15/2016) [-]
I never said it was okay.

I said that Superman was written to be ultimately powerful. Since people go into it knowing that, it has a completely different atmosphere than Batman, who is routinely SUPPOSED to struggle.

It's the difference between watching a show like One Punch Man and KNOWING he's going to take out every enemy with one punch, vs. watching some anime where there is supposed to be struggle, hardship, and strife, and the MC just happens to kick everyone's ass easily and effortlessly. Obviously you'd think of one very different than the other.

If a character is written to be ultimately powerful and, lo and behold, he gets out of bad circumstances with said power, it is an entirely different place than if a character is written to be flawed and challenged and, lo and behold, gets out of every negative situation with some convenient plot device or skill.

*This is why they TEACH reading comprehension :^)
#73 - >> #24 Unless you have more recent proof.  [+] (1 reply) 04/15/2016 on /Pol/ asks an immigrant a... 0
User avatar
#74 - gabemczombie (04/15/2016) [-]
Well i've never seen a single bit of news about it aside from that and i've never heard of a single other priest or bishop wanting to do anything like this.

Hell, the only thing priests talk about during their sermons are "We should help who we can." and then goes on to commend some refugee centers for actually getting their jobs right.
#16 - Why?  [+] (3 replies) 04/15/2016 on Lobo has balls +1
#64 - LewdFlapjack (04/15/2016) [-]
>#63
User avatar
#86 - confusedasian (04/15/2016) [-]
>>#63

Two > and no #.
#101 - LewdFlapjack (04/15/2016) [-]
thanks bruh
#15 - You misspelled Batman. Doesn't get more boring than p…  [+] (9 replies) 04/15/2016 on Lobo has balls -36
User avatar
#84 - brobathehutt (04/15/2016) [-]
At least batman is fucking entertaining plot armor. "Oh I can beat this god to death but I do it cleverly" is so much better than "Let me just punch a god to death" because while both are retarded at least with Batman he finds some weakness or figures out some way to actually improve himself (usually tech armor) instead of good old "I have this superpower now". This is also why Batman beyond was cool, Terry had to be clever in his fights even with his high tech gadgets, but it helped that Terry never had to do dumb shit like fight a god.
User avatar
#70 - europe (04/15/2016) [-]
Better to have plot armor than a mary sue who's only weakness is a rare metal
User avatar
#25 - komandantmirkoo (04/15/2016) [-]
implying superman isn't made out of plot armor
#121 - anon (04/25/2016) [-]
do people like you and anon saying suerman is boring even read comics. I mean, i know the answer is no, you dont. what Im getting at is shut the hell up when you dont know what you are talking about. superman is the opposite of having plot armor. everyone else has one to make it out as if they are hurting him.
User avatar
#67 - baditch (04/15/2016) [-]
Batman is made out of popularity armor
User avatar
#26 - captainfuckitall (04/15/2016) [-]
The difference is that Superman is SUPPOSED to be. Batman is just supposed to be a regular guy who BECAME a Mary-Sue because his fans shit themselves with rage if he did anything other than beat Dr.Manhatten with his arms tied around his back.
#36 - anon (04/15/2016) [-]
that didn't make any sense

"character is boring because plot armour, but plot armour is good if a character is SUPPOSED to have plot armour, unlike batman, who was written to have plot armour"

this is why they reach reading comprehension
User avatar
#39 - captainfuckitall (04/15/2016) [-]
I never said it was okay.

I said that Superman was written to be ultimately powerful. Since people go into it knowing that, it has a completely different atmosphere than Batman, who is routinely SUPPOSED to struggle.

It's the difference between watching a show like One Punch Man and KNOWING he's going to take out every enemy with one punch, vs. watching some anime where there is supposed to be struggle, hardship, and strife, and the MC just happens to kick everyone's ass easily and effortlessly. Obviously you'd think of one very different than the other.

If a character is written to be ultimately powerful and, lo and behold, he gets out of bad circumstances with said power, it is an entirely different place than if a character is written to be flawed and challenged and, lo and behold, gets out of every negative situation with some convenient plot device or skill.

*This is why they TEACH reading comprehension :^)
User avatar
#24 - lemonlord (04/15/2016) [-]
That's every super hero in the history of super heroes.
It's almost as if the hero is written to always win or some shit.
So don't pretend like superman and batman are written any differently.
Batman always has a bullshit plan, superman always has a bullshit power.
Not criticising your taste like whomever you like and hate whomever you hate, I just find your reasoning silly
#16 - Didn't a Swedish Bishop toss an idea to take down crosses in t…  [+] (8 replies) 04/14/2016 on /Pol/ asks an immigrant a... +12
User avatar
#72 - gabemczombie (04/15/2016) [-]
Pretty sure that turned out to be fake
User avatar
#73 - captainfuckitall (04/15/2016) [-]
>>#24

Unless you have more recent proof.
User avatar
#74 - gabemczombie (04/15/2016) [-]
Well i've never seen a single bit of news about it aside from that and i've never heard of a single other priest or bishop wanting to do anything like this.

Hell, the only thing priests talk about during their sermons are "We should help who we can." and then goes on to commend some refugee centers for actually getting their jobs right.
User avatar
#25 - selongb (04/14/2016) [-]
Yeah, the bishop of stockholm, she also is the first recognized lesbian bishop. But she has been criticized before, like in 2010, she got in trouble for involvement in an anti-racism rally focused against the Sweden Democrats party Which is much more conservative than the name might suggest to an Amerifag .
#52 - anon (04/15/2016) [-]
It's not particularly conservative. It's actually pretty close to center, which most Scandinavian parties are.

Fuck Miljöpartiet de gröna and miljøpartiet de grønne. Peace nigger.
User avatar
#53 - selongb (04/15/2016) [-]
Ah, I just went off their wikipedia page, Nordic politics aren't my strong suit.
#23 - Mehwhatevs (04/14/2016) [-]
Yeah, one guy suggested it. One. Guy. The majority of swedes are a part of the Swedish christian church, this is only because they were made members of it by default though, most swedes would identify as atheist or non-religious.
User avatar
#24 - captainfuckitall (04/14/2016) [-]
www.wnd.com/2015/10/lesbian-bishop-remove-crosses-from-church/

Just one regular chap is different from an actual Bishop, friend.