Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

captainfuckitall    

Rank #443 on Comments
captainfuckitall Avatar Level 342 Comments: Sold Soul
Offline
Send mail to captainfuckitall Block captainfuckitall Invite captainfuckitall to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#443
Highest Content Rank:#10530
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 40 total,  90 ,  50
Comment Thumbs: 43943 total,  54497 ,  10554
Content Level Progress: 76.27% (45/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 52.8% (528/1000)
Level 342 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 343 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:20
Content Views:9646
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:14142
FJ Points:14758

latest user's comments

#52 - This comment literally made my face curl in disgust. 11/17/2013 on Skyrim Perfect Accuracy -1
#73 - Indeed, and I have just changed my argument to be more fitting…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/17/2013 on Single player 0
User avatar #76 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
There's excusing and then there's condemning the whole game because of it. There is literally no more nunace to the statement "The multiplayer is good, the singleplayer is garbage and as such the game is ok" than saying "The multiplayer is good but the singleplayer is garbage, therefore the game is garbage". One, however, takes into account everything and gives a statement balancing everything. The other is reaching for a verdict just taking into account what you care to take into account.

Judgement on anything cannot be passed as a "Thumbs up/thumbs down" approach if you truly care for it. You have to mention the nuances. You can say "This game has very good graphis. The dialogue, however, feels stiff and unatural" There is no reason why one statement should override the other one. They both exist, and if you chose to discard one that is your choice. It is not a complete view of the material, and you cannot pass a judgement of the entirety of it based on half of it.
#72 - *Unless a game is made expressly for the multiplayer aspect, h… 11/17/2013 on Single player 0
#59 - Because a game is supposed to be made FOR singleplayer, the mu…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Single player 0
#61 - Neodude (11/17/2013) [-]
You can't say game are made for single player anymore, when there are entire, highly successful genres that have no single player.
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
*Unless a game is made expressly for the multiplayer aspect, having a good multiplayer does not excuse a poor singleplayer.
User avatar #60 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
That's like saying "Games are supposed to be made for tables". Every bit of game design it's valid. What about Wow? MAG? TF2? Those games literally can't stand on multiplayer, you can't argue they're bad games (OK, Maybe MAG). I am playing devil's advocate because I don't play multiplayer, but saying that just because you don't care about other parts of the game therefore they should just be considered extras to the part that makes you actually care is too near-sighted.

Super Smash Bros. is not made for singleplayer, it's made for multiplayer. That franchise get's old incredibly fast if you're alone. Same for fighting games. Party games? Theres hundreds of games that just stand on multiplayer; from deathmach to mash a to get a star. And they're well designed, just 'cause you or Yahtzee don't care for it doesn't make it bad.
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
Indeed, and I have just changed my argument to be more fitting. *Unless a game is expressly made for the multiplayer aspect, having a good mutliplayer does not excuse poor singleplayer.

Your logic would also mean having good graphics excuses poor dialogue, or good weapons/fights excuse bad environments, they don't, it's all a big framework and the weakest link is only going to hold the rest back. I mean, you could literally have the greatest tasting jello on the planet, but even if only 1% of it is poop, nobody is ever going to eat it*

*That is, unless they have a fetish for it.
User avatar #76 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
There's excusing and then there's condemning the whole game because of it. There is literally no more nunace to the statement "The multiplayer is good, the singleplayer is garbage and as such the game is ok" than saying "The multiplayer is good but the singleplayer is garbage, therefore the game is garbage". One, however, takes into account everything and gives a statement balancing everything. The other is reaching for a verdict just taking into account what you care to take into account.

Judgement on anything cannot be passed as a "Thumbs up/thumbs down" approach if you truly care for it. You have to mention the nuances. You can say "This game has very good graphis. The dialogue, however, feels stiff and unatural" There is no reason why one statement should override the other one. They both exist, and if you chose to discard one that is your choice. It is not a complete view of the material, and you cannot pass a judgement of the entirety of it based on half of it.
#55 - I disagree with your disagreement.  [+] (7 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Single player 0
User avatar #56 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
Would you care to elaborate on why, say, a game could not stand on multiplayer alone? Why is a game allowed to have a shitty multiplayer as long as the singleplayer bit is good?
User avatar #59 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
Because a game is supposed to be made FOR singleplayer, the multiplayer is just a bonus. If a bonus is better than the thing itself, it's not much of a thing. If the single-player is bad, it doesn't matter how good the multiplayer is, it doesn't make up for the fact that the singleplayer sucks. That's all.
#61 - Neodude (11/17/2013) [-]
You can't say game are made for single player anymore, when there are entire, highly successful genres that have no single player.
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
*Unless a game is made expressly for the multiplayer aspect, having a good multiplayer does not excuse a poor singleplayer.
User avatar #60 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
That's like saying "Games are supposed to be made for tables". Every bit of game design it's valid. What about Wow? MAG? TF2? Those games literally can't stand on multiplayer, you can't argue they're bad games (OK, Maybe MAG). I am playing devil's advocate because I don't play multiplayer, but saying that just because you don't care about other parts of the game therefore they should just be considered extras to the part that makes you actually care is too near-sighted.

Super Smash Bros. is not made for singleplayer, it's made for multiplayer. That franchise get's old incredibly fast if you're alone. Same for fighting games. Party games? Theres hundreds of games that just stand on multiplayer; from deathmach to mash a to get a star. And they're well designed, just 'cause you or Yahtzee don't care for it doesn't make it bad.
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
Indeed, and I have just changed my argument to be more fitting. *Unless a game is expressly made for the multiplayer aspect, having a good mutliplayer does not excuse poor singleplayer.

Your logic would also mean having good graphics excuses poor dialogue, or good weapons/fights excuse bad environments, they don't, it's all a big framework and the weakest link is only going to hold the rest back. I mean, you could literally have the greatest tasting jello on the planet, but even if only 1% of it is poop, nobody is ever going to eat it*

*That is, unless they have a fetish for it.
User avatar #76 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
There's excusing and then there's condemning the whole game because of it. There is literally no more nunace to the statement "The multiplayer is good, the singleplayer is garbage and as such the game is ok" than saying "The multiplayer is good but the singleplayer is garbage, therefore the game is garbage". One, however, takes into account everything and gives a statement balancing everything. The other is reaching for a verdict just taking into account what you care to take into account.

Judgement on anything cannot be passed as a "Thumbs up/thumbs down" approach if you truly care for it. You have to mention the nuances. You can say "This game has very good graphis. The dialogue, however, feels stiff and unatural" There is no reason why one statement should override the other one. They both exist, and if you chose to discard one that is your choice. It is not a complete view of the material, and you cannot pass a judgement of the entirety of it based on half of it.
#28 - I'm actually more turned on by Stockings than I am by tits...  [+] (3 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Plot thickening +7
User avatar #53 - indigobob (11/17/2013) [-]
I completely agree
#50 - feupy (11/17/2013) [-]
I can understand this
#108 - gcloud (11/17/2013) [-]
just cuz
#11 - I remember playing a DBZ game with my friends, and we were jus…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Watch out for raging blast +2
#14 - jonnythan (11/17/2013) [-]
when did piccolo die?
User avatar #15 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
In the game, I forgot to save after a while and I died and didn't feel like going through all it again. Similar to my experience in Halo.
#7 - So does this. 11/17/2013 on pantyhose 0
#6 - This makes me uncomfortable. 11/17/2013 on pantyhose 0
#15 - What a way to find out he sticks your tampons up his ass. 11/17/2013 on What I'll do to my mans... 0
#6 - And Venus Flytraps would have creepy, drug-dealer voices. … 11/17/2013 on plant noises +46
#39 - I actually feel the same way in Canada. Ya, we're supposed to …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/17/2013 on >Europe -1
User avatar #40 - Sethorein (11/17/2013) [-]
I'm a canadian... I'm pretty okay with things... I've only met one fereigner who I've ever really hated... the guy was an asshat though...
#17 - The best moment, absolute best moment in gaming, is where you … 11/17/2013 on Moments in Gaming 0
#39 - As the great Yahtzee once said: "A lot of people may just…  [+] (9 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Single player 0
User avatar #50 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
I disagree.
User avatar #55 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
I disagree with your disagreement.
User avatar #56 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
Would you care to elaborate on why, say, a game could not stand on multiplayer alone? Why is a game allowed to have a shitty multiplayer as long as the singleplayer bit is good?
User avatar #59 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
Because a game is supposed to be made FOR singleplayer, the multiplayer is just a bonus. If a bonus is better than the thing itself, it's not much of a thing. If the single-player is bad, it doesn't matter how good the multiplayer is, it doesn't make up for the fact that the singleplayer sucks. That's all.
#61 - Neodude (11/17/2013) [-]
You can't say game are made for single player anymore, when there are entire, highly successful genres that have no single player.
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
*Unless a game is made expressly for the multiplayer aspect, having a good multiplayer does not excuse a poor singleplayer.
User avatar #60 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
That's like saying "Games are supposed to be made for tables". Every bit of game design it's valid. What about Wow? MAG? TF2? Those games literally can't stand on multiplayer, you can't argue they're bad games (OK, Maybe MAG). I am playing devil's advocate because I don't play multiplayer, but saying that just because you don't care about other parts of the game therefore they should just be considered extras to the part that makes you actually care is too near-sighted.

Super Smash Bros. is not made for singleplayer, it's made for multiplayer. That franchise get's old incredibly fast if you're alone. Same for fighting games. Party games? Theres hundreds of games that just stand on multiplayer; from deathmach to mash a to get a star. And they're well designed, just 'cause you or Yahtzee don't care for it doesn't make it bad.
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
Indeed, and I have just changed my argument to be more fitting. *Unless a game is expressly made for the multiplayer aspect, having a good mutliplayer does not excuse poor singleplayer.

Your logic would also mean having good graphics excuses poor dialogue, or good weapons/fights excuse bad environments, they don't, it's all a big framework and the weakest link is only going to hold the rest back. I mean, you could literally have the greatest tasting jello on the planet, but even if only 1% of it is poop, nobody is ever going to eat it*

*That is, unless they have a fetish for it.
User avatar #76 - thebestpieever (11/17/2013) [-]
There's excusing and then there's condemning the whole game because of it. There is literally no more nunace to the statement "The multiplayer is good, the singleplayer is garbage and as such the game is ok" than saying "The multiplayer is good but the singleplayer is garbage, therefore the game is garbage". One, however, takes into account everything and gives a statement balancing everything. The other is reaching for a verdict just taking into account what you care to take into account.

Judgement on anything cannot be passed as a "Thumbs up/thumbs down" approach if you truly care for it. You have to mention the nuances. You can say "This game has very good graphis. The dialogue, however, feels stiff and unatural" There is no reason why one statement should override the other one. They both exist, and if you chose to discard one that is your choice. It is not a complete view of the material, and you cannot pass a judgement of the entirety of it based on half of it.
#16 - Eh, honestly, I agree with him. It wouldn't matter how old I w…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Shit's fucked up, bro +3
User avatar #20 - Loopholes (11/17/2013) [-]
You say that being the age you are, you do not hold the same morals and ethics through your whole life, she doesn't even understand herself, never mind how the world works when she is 4-9.
How do you think children can be so shitty? They have no idea of the impact of what they do, it's why bullying is so prominent.
All she knows is dad told her to lie (Most likely through intimidation or threat), so she does to avoid bad things happening.
If you're seriously holding a 4 year old accountable you are insane.
#31 - anonymous (11/17/2013) [-]
Anon here. The break showed that time passe when she turned four. Not really putting in too much work to figure it out (Im lazy af). The --time passes -- part I'm going to guess that hes early 20s and shes about 12, so what, Gr. 5 ish? Me personally, I grew up to not snake your friends, or blood at all for that matter. Idgaf about her talking about the dad, but her dragging the brother in was uncalled for imo. It may have been forced by the dad, but she also had multiple times in which she coul have told the truth.
#9 - "It sucks your wife isn't here right now. Maybe I could b…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/17/2013 on My wife? I dont own a wife +6
User avatar #21 - snarfalupticus (11/17/2013) [-]
Just for meow.
#7 - Just imagine living through that, just how much it would …  [+] (4 new replies) 11/17/2013 on Skyrim Perfect Accuracy +4
#49 - adr (11/17/2013) [-]
Yes but just imagine how arousing it would be
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (11/17/2013) [-]
This comment literally made my face curl in disgust.
User avatar #28 - crazyhindu (11/17/2013) [-]
It would be a pain in the ass
User avatar #55 - Shitthatscrazy (11/17/2013) [-]
Your point?
#33 - Doesn't it just suck when nobody believes your lie? 11/17/2013 on Srsly 0
#3 - Does gravity even lift?  [+] (2 new replies) 11/16/2013 on Gravity Lifts +51
#34 - skublakas (11/17/2013) [-]
but normal force lifts
#6 - anonymous (11/17/2013) [-]
Nope, it falls
#113 - Oh, I suppose you're correct. Then I apologize and correct mys…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/16/2013 on Well to hell with it! +1
User avatar #116 - furrynomous (11/16/2013) [-]
It's fun sometimes (and unfortunately rare) having an actual intelligent conversation on internet.

Have a good day
#109 - Of course I do, it means "Superior", and I do believ…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/16/2013 on Well to hell with it! 0
User avatar #111 - furrynomous (11/16/2013) [-]
It doesn't exactly mean superior, it means supreme, as in better in every way. I'd rather call what you're talking about "white pride" because at least you can say that other races are better at some other things.
User avatar #113 - captainfuckitall (11/16/2013) [-]
Oh, I suppose you're correct. Then I apologize and correct myself.

-I have White Pride.

Thank you very much, sir.
User avatar #116 - furrynomous (11/16/2013) [-]
It's fun sometimes (and unfortunately rare) having an actual intelligent conversation on internet.

Have a good day
#31 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 11/16/2013 on My biggest wish right now ... 0
#41 - anonymous Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#29 - Comment deleted  [+] (3 new replies) 11/16/2013 on My biggest wish right now ... 0
#30 - trollmobile Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#31 - captainfuckitall Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#41 - anonymous Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#26 - Comment deleted  [+] (5 new replies) 11/16/2013 on My biggest wish right now ... 0
#27 - trollmobile Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#29 - captainfuckitall Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#30 - trollmobile Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#31 - captainfuckitall Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#41 - anonymous Comment deleted by captainfuckitall
#94 - -I honestly think the Nazi's had a good thing going and would …  [+] (5 new replies) 11/16/2013 on Well to hell with it! 0
User avatar #101 - furrynomous (11/16/2013) [-]
You do know what supremacy means, right? It's not about being proud of your race or country, it's about thinking it's superior to all other races.
User avatar #109 - captainfuckitall (11/16/2013) [-]
Of course I do, it means "Superior", and I do believe that my country and people are indeed superior in some things while others are superior in others.
User avatar #111 - furrynomous (11/16/2013) [-]
It doesn't exactly mean superior, it means supreme, as in better in every way. I'd rather call what you're talking about "white pride" because at least you can say that other races are better at some other things.
User avatar #113 - captainfuckitall (11/16/2013) [-]
Oh, I suppose you're correct. Then I apologize and correct myself.

-I have White Pride.

Thank you very much, sir.
User avatar #116 - furrynomous (11/16/2013) [-]
It's fun sometimes (and unfortunately rare) having an actual intelligent conversation on internet.

Have a good day

Comments(480):

[ 480 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
#466 - anonymous (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, ******** , and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
User avatar #461 - potgardener (06/01/2013) [-]
youre pretty ****** in the head if beating a kid is a good idea, parents would need to hit their kids if they taught them what was right and wrong from the beginning
User avatar #462 to #461 - captainfuckitall (06/01/2013) [-]
It's ironic how you talk about avoiding situations, when your very comment isn't needed considering I already explained, about five times now, that I do not mean you must 'abuse' your children in order to get good results. My comment, and all the comments afterwards, were about how when compassion and support fails you must turn to punishment and discipline, including simply smacking your kid upside the head

Perhaps you should read more and get better informed before jumping to opinions, yes?
#459 - bossdelainternet (05/11/2013) [-]
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest  threads i've seen this year.   
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...   
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
I'd just like to say thank you for created one of the funniest threads i've seen this year.
To sum up why i thought it was so funny, a quote...
"Most people would say 'I lost. I give up.', but you, you just keep trying. You're like the Dominican Republic, always killing the guy in charge and saying 'Ah, this new guy, this new guy's gonna get it right!'." - Family Guy
User avatar #460 to #459 - captainfuckitall (05/11/2013) [-]
I'm not sure whether I should take that as a compliment or an insult

I choose the former

Thank you, good sir
#453 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
I just thought I'd let you know that I just did an awful thing and quoted your majestic deep words of death wisdom onto my facebook. I gave you credit, but as part of my shame for stealing I thought I'd tell you. That was honestly one of the best things I've ever read.

Which is also why I screencapped it. Don't worry I swear I'm not going to try to get to frontpage with it I just wanted to save it.
User avatar #454 to #453 - captainfuckitall (11/12/2012) [-]
Not at all, I am not concerned with thumbs in the least. If you would like to post it, by all means do so, if you'd like to take credit, do so as well; I care not for material value or fame, as long as comprehend and understand the message
#455 to #454 - WhattheNorris (11/12/2012) [-]
Oh man you just keep getting better:)    
   
But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
Oh man you just keep getting better:)

But I wouldn't dare steal your credit.
#449 - captainspankmonkey (02/27/2012) [-]
Internet problems
That is why :P
User avatar #450 to #460 - captainfuckitall (02/27/2012) [-]
ahhh, haha, sorry then :P
#447 - anonymous (09/26/2011) [-]
you're a lovely person
User avatar #448 to #458 - captainfuckitall (09/26/2011) [-]
awe, thank you, kind stranger :3

that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :D
#444 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
Im becoming level 28 soon
User avatar #445 to #454 - captainfuckitall (08/22/2011) [-]
sooooooooooooooooon............
User avatar #446 to #455 - captainspankmonkey (08/22/2011) [-]
very soooooooooooooooooooooon......
#437 - anonymous (07/31/2011) [-]
Lololololol mfw you block me and delete my comment because I expose that you're an ignorant dumbass
User avatar #438 to #447 - captainfuckitall (07/31/2011) [-]
no, i didn't block you because you "exposed that i am an ignorant dumbass". i blocked you because i know who you are, and remembered who you are. you are thebiggestmaggot. you have a (last time i checked) profile picture of an old lady with bouncing tits in a swimsuit. and you are also a nihilist that annoyed the hell out of me last time i talked because you were ignorant, arrogant, and rude, and drove me to a place i don't like going to simply because i do not like people like you. the reason i removed the comment is because 1. it was wrong. 2. you wouldn't have listened if i told you otherwise. and 3. it was Wikipedia, and unreliable source. and, since you are against what i believe, you will logically look for a source that undermines it. and i simply don't have the patience to deal with you

that's why
[ 480 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)