Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#591
Highest Content Rank:#8779
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 78892 total,  96883 ,  17991
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 84.3% (843/1000)
Level 367 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 368 Comments: FJ Noble
Content Views:10927
Total Comments Made:20812
FJ Points:40047

latest user's comments

#37 - In the movies, perhaps, but in the book, Adam was highly intel…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/26/2016 on Know the Difference 0
User avatar
#38 - logainablar (07/26/2016) [-]
im actually referring to one of the first playscripts
#22 - He calls himself Adam, actually.  [+] (6 new replies) 07/26/2016 on Know the Difference 0
User avatar
#25 - logainablar (07/26/2016) [-]
no, Frankenstein called him Adam. Frankenstein could only handle a few words but not names
User avatar
#37 - captainfuckitall (07/26/2016) [-]
In the movies, perhaps, but in the book, Adam was highly intelligent and a bibliophile; he named himself Adam after a biblical reference of being the first 'created' man, but indeed, he could talk and had a very large and extensive vocabulary and means of expression.
User avatar
#38 - logainablar (07/26/2016) [-]
im actually referring to one of the first playscripts
User avatar
#28 - senseiweasel (07/26/2016) [-]
Then how the hell did he earn a doctorate?
User avatar
#30 - logainablar (07/26/2016) [-]
I mean the monster not Frankenstein
User avatar
#31 - senseiweasel (07/26/2016) [-]
Common mistake.
#24 - His potions were too strong for you, traveler... 07/22/2016 on Youtube comp part 11 0
#273 - It's not 'social problems' when they actively go around commit… 07/20/2016 on And here come the racists 0
#265 - No, we don't. You used an example of evil done by another reli…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/19/2016 on And here come the racists 0
User avatar
#271 - fatminion (07/20/2016) [-]
no, Jews were blamed for economic problems and corruption. But it doesn't matter. Blaming a demographic for social problems is inherently wrong. Yes, terrorists are bad. Yes murderers are bad. But that's as far as it goes. Everyone has the ability to be a terrorist or a murderer, so we shouldn't treat people with dark skin or religious beliefs better or worse than anyone else because "they might be more likely to be a murderer or terrorist". Should we use every available resource and intuition to vet migrants and school teachers and potential domestic and foreign terrorists? YES!!!! Should we disallow entire demographics from entering our nation or shoot first and asw questions later? No!
User avatar
#273 - captainfuckitall (07/20/2016) [-]
It's not 'social problems' when they actively go around committing it. You can SEE it, you can look online and LOOK; this isn't some great subjective basis regarding social or cultural phenomena or the benefits of disadvantages of multiculturalism, it's just fact. There's no factual ambiguity; that now that so many refugees (immigrants, rather, as they sure as hell won't be going back once the war is over), there are more problems than ever with skyrocketing crime rates and social activism advocating for all the most shitty parts of Islam (Sharia Law in the UK).

We're not upset because of their skin colour, we're upset because they come a culture that is wildly different from our own, one that is more volatile, more extreme, and yet still more savage than most on the entire planet, and they are NOT assimilating well, or at all.
#40 - Maybe but why pay attention to things like facts and objective… 07/19/2016 on Despite all my rage +16
#109 - Damn, son; you really are dedicated. But hey, a fetis…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/18/2016 on Clever Boy +17
User avatar
#111 - TheInvader (07/18/2016) [-]
thank you, I am sorry I took so long to reply but I was doing a Kurumi comp since somebody requested it: /channel/CompileHeart/Kurumi+tokisaki+random+pics/mRMkLzE/
#22 - Source? I tried looking it up and couldn't find anything.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/16/2016 on Talk Shit 0
User avatar
#63 - SteyrAUG (07/16/2016) [-]
It's an internet joke
#274 - Of course I'm seeing it, but it's not an echo-chamber so much … 07/16/2016 on Truck Attack In Nice +1
#220 - No we're not. There's a difference between 'dogpiling…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/15/2016 on Truck Attack In Nice +1
User avatar
#238 - subejio (07/15/2016) [-]
You're taking the most extreme examples to compare to. I mean hell, we worship 4chan and we know for a damn fact they do whatever they please, including the doxxing and threats. But... I dunno. Maybe you're right. Fuck.

It just gets infuriating watching this. I see the same arguments on two different topics get two different results. Calling an SJW out on using death for their political views is popular. Calling someone on our side out for doing the same gets you thumbed to oblivion and... fuck, how many replies is this poor bastard up to now? It gets you a flood of angry responses insulting you every way they can think of. I can't think of one argument from decency that I haven't seen be abandoned on this site as soon as the perpetrator is supporting our views.

And yeah, bitching about internet points is silly, but when we're slapping anyone who disagrees with us in the face and giving them actual numbers to tell them just how much they can go fuck themselves, even when they're making valid points that we claim to support, we're pushing them off the site, and turning this more and more into an echo chamber. (And for the record, I'm not bitching about red thumbs being a thing. I'm bitching about how and when they're being used.)

Are you really telling me you're not seeing this, too? Where we're all moral and holier-than-thou right up until someone disagrees with us? I CAN'T be the only one noticing this shit.
User avatar
#274 - captainfuckitall (07/16/2016) [-]
Of course I'm seeing it, but it's not an echo-chamber so much as it is the flavour of the week. Remember, it also depends on what content and time-zone you are on.

The thing about Funnyjunk is that we actually ARE a radically diverse demographic. The vast majority of people on the site fall somewhere between moderate to small-right.

Of course you have shitfests and assholes and mudslinging and self-righteousness, but the appeal is that nobody actually ruins your personal life over it. That's it. We're a bunch of autistic assholes, very few of us take eachother or even ourselves seriously, and just come here to blow off steam or beat the bantz and have a laugh over it, or just to stroke ourselves off to the rage.

I don't mean to make this place out to be some type of bastion either, but both the admin and the mods do a really good job at NOT fucking people over or letting OTHERS fuck people over, regardless of what they say.

Shit, you got people who call our own Admin a pedo-faggot and he just calls you a dumb dumb, that's actual free-speech old top, and what it is meant to be. Har har.