x
Click to expand

captainfuckitall

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/12/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9118
Comment Ranking:#1604
Highest Content Rank:#9131
Highest Comment Rank:#49
Content Thumbs: 42 total,  99 ,  57
Comment Thumbs: 58478 total,  71882 ,  13404
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 94.5% (945/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:22
Content Views:10883
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:16805
FJ Points:25177

latest user's comments

#21 - I actually really sympathized with Ultron as a villain and as … 3 hours ago on I knew Tumblr would be our... +2
#80 - I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove t…  [+] (1 new reply) 6 hours ago on Science 0
User avatar #81 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#78 - Well they were 'convinced'. The happenings in the book have be…  [+] (3 new replies) 6 hours ago on Science 0
User avatar #79 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
An imprint is evidence of something
Not ghosts. Not elephants. You have to actually determine what caused the imprint. That's why it's useless as evidence for anything other than itself.

And I'll be right in doing so.
If you can prove it, great. I'll accept that ghosts are real, and I'll be right in doing so.
User avatar #80 - captainfuckitall (6 hours ago) [-]
I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove there's more credit behind the paranormal than many people want to admit.
User avatar #81 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#76 - The book is actually quite famous for convincing many skeptics…  [+] (5 new replies) 6 hours ago on Science 0
User avatar #77 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
Sure.
Go on youtube and search for "Islam skeptics" and you'll find hundreds of videos that show a skeptic being convinced that Islam is the one true religion.
This doesn't mean shit.

When you convince the scientific community, then you can talk about proper evidence.
Until then, nah. Your evidence is shit.
User avatar #78 - captainfuckitall (6 hours ago) [-]
Well they were 'convinced'. The happenings in the book have been examined and no probable cause was found; so they just put it on the backburner and it's been there ever since.

They can't conclude 'dem ghosts gone dun it!' because we don't have the materials required to measure such things, but only the imprint, which is literally what you asked for, remember? "An invisible elephant still leaves a footprint".

The issue is that, no matter what anyone finds or what the scientific community says, it will not be concluded because we don't have the right tools. Until we do, it will always just be "strange happenings" that you will brush off.
User avatar #79 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
An imprint is evidence of something
Not ghosts. Not elephants. You have to actually determine what caused the imprint. That's why it's useless as evidence for anything other than itself.

And I'll be right in doing so.
If you can prove it, great. I'll accept that ghosts are real, and I'll be right in doing so.
User avatar #80 - captainfuckitall (6 hours ago) [-]
I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove there's more credit behind the paranormal than many people want to admit.
User avatar #81 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#74 - Okay, so what you're telling me now is that you want evidence,…  [+] (7 new replies) 6 hours ago on Science 0
User avatar #75 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
It must be sufficient evidence to convince a skeptic.
Anything less is pointless.

Anecdotal evidence and argumentation is simply not enough.
If this is a physical phenomenon, it leaves physical traces ---> evidence.
Such things have not been found despite rigorous searching.

Absence of evidence when evidence should be present, is evidence of absence
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (6 hours ago) [-]
The book is actually quite famous for convincing many skeptics and is, in fact, on the 'must read' list of non-fiction.

Though some are harder to convince than others I suppose.
User avatar #77 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
Sure.
Go on youtube and search for "Islam skeptics" and you'll find hundreds of videos that show a skeptic being convinced that Islam is the one true religion.
This doesn't mean shit.

When you convince the scientific community, then you can talk about proper evidence.
Until then, nah. Your evidence is shit.
User avatar #78 - captainfuckitall (6 hours ago) [-]
Well they were 'convinced'. The happenings in the book have been examined and no probable cause was found; so they just put it on the backburner and it's been there ever since.

They can't conclude 'dem ghosts gone dun it!' because we don't have the materials required to measure such things, but only the imprint, which is literally what you asked for, remember? "An invisible elephant still leaves a footprint".

The issue is that, no matter what anyone finds or what the scientific community says, it will not be concluded because we don't have the right tools. Until we do, it will always just be "strange happenings" that you will brush off.
User avatar #79 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
An imprint is evidence of something
Not ghosts. Not elephants. You have to actually determine what caused the imprint. That's why it's useless as evidence for anything other than itself.

And I'll be right in doing so.
If you can prove it, great. I'll accept that ghosts are real, and I'll be right in doing so.
User avatar #80 - captainfuckitall (6 hours ago) [-]
I'm not trying to prove ghosts are real, I'm trying to prove there's more credit behind the paranormal than many people want to admit.
User avatar #81 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
That's awfully vague.
If they manage to produce some useful results, I'll give them credit.
Until then, I'll see all "paranormal investigators" as being on par with those "bigfoot hunters" on Discovery Channel.
Fat, redneck americans walking through a random forest, attributing every sound in the forest to Bigfoot.

Dousing rods, psychics, tarot cards, astrology.
All that crap.
Not once has it demonstrated an actual effect or use, other than the placebo effect or conning idiots out of their money.
#72 - 14 hours actually, the part you're listening to is just the fi… 6 hours ago on Science 0
#68 - That's fine, I figured you were 'done' when you asked for evid… 7 hours ago on Science 0
#67 - Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks… 7 hours ago on Science 0
#64 - BECAUSE I read it, I would know you'd barely be past the intro…  [+] (1 new reply) 7 hours ago on Science 0
User avatar #69 - testaburger (6 hours ago) [-]
Hey, ghosts would be fucking cool
It'd be a world-changing discovery.
We're talking Nobel Prize shit.
And yet, nobody has managed to produce so much as a proper indication that there's actually something there.

It's like the Loch Ness Monster.
Several decades.
No bodies.
Nothing other than hearsay and shitty pictures.

There's no fucking Loch Ness Monster.
Find it? Fucking awesome. Why the fuck was there not even a shred of evidence of its existence?


I would love it if the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, etc was real.
But it just doesn't seem like they are. And people have had a lot of time to prove their case.
#63 - No. If the word 'supernatural' is all you're concerned about, …  [+] (2 new replies) 7 hours ago on Science 0
User avatar #65 - rakogoki (7 hours ago) [-]
still not getting my point...
"supernatural means what isnt measured" my rocks arent measured, they must be supernatural then by that definition correct? i agreed with this, but then you turn around and bring ghosts into the discussion like i wouldnt notice.
this is what happens when you have a poor definition, we cant even begin to argue whether something is real or not until you fully define your terms.

what is a "ghost" and what relation does it have with the term "supernatural"?
User avatar #67 - captainfuckitall (7 hours ago) [-]
Yet they are, we know types of rocks, the composition of rocks, and how they are formed. When I say measure I'm not talking about putting a tape measurer to it. I thought someone so caught up on semantics as you would know that.

Well, I can't really say, because my evidence is anecdotal and I am not a peer reviewed scientist. Are you willing to take my word for it? If not, it doesn't matter.

Comments(508):

[ 508 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#513 - Ken M (02/16/2015) [-]
I thought I'd waste some time also, and FIX yo' thumbs ;)
#514 to #513 - Ken M (02/16/2015) [-]
Love, luluwho
#505 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
Man, I think I love you
Man, I think I love you
User avatar #506 to #505 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Haha, where the hell did that come from?
User avatar #507 to #506 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I saw that kind of argument that you had and I liked not only what you said but the way you said it, I think you did it pretty cool and everything

if you meant the gif it's from Soul Eater
User avatar #508 to #507 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
That's the first time I heard that. Generally, my abrasive and blunt speech drives most people to dislike me, not give me affection. You're a sweetheart, though.

Haha, no, I did not mean the gif.
User avatar #509 to #508 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
I feel the same way about myself, I have to say that if those speeches were used against me I would feel a little bit upset, but you ask for clear answers and sources, and you try to make the other person think before they speak, I like that in general, not just mindless bashing ahaha
User avatar #510 to #509 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Well I'm certainly glad you can see the good in my speaking skills. Frankly, I do it to get to the point. I hate having my time wasted for any reason, and so I extend that courtesy to others and try not to waste anyone else's time either; which leads me to being very blunt and brutal in my words so that they cannot be confused or misheard. Though I admit I was frustrated in that debate.
User avatar #511 to #510 - thediablo (01/26/2015) [-]
most of them are frustrating anyway

and yeah, it sucks when people start to get offtrack because of a single comment that you used as an example or something, it's proof that they are desperately trying to derail the conversation to their favor
User avatar #512 to #511 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/26/2015) [-]
Oh well. When you get into a debate with someone, the point should be because you are trying to change your own views, not theirs.

If someone doesn't want to believe something, they won't. End of story. You could use all the proof you want to tell someone the colour of the sky is blue, but if they want it to be green, it will be and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Thus, the only person you should be focused on changing in a debate is yourself, and only do so to get more perspective on the issues important to you.
User avatar #498 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
#492 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #494 to #492 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well aren't you a sweetheart for helping me get over my fear
#495 to #494 - miia ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
im actually about to go to bed but hi
User avatar #499 to #495 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
Who's the artist? Sauce?
User avatar #500 to #499 - miia ONLINE (01/08/2015) [-]
i dont remember and its too late for me to find out
reverse search it
#501 to #500 - aurumleo (01/08/2015) [-]
I found it! The artist's nukomasu. Thanks, Miia. If it weren't for that image, I won't find it.
User avatar #496 to #495 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (12/13/2014) [-]
Well don't let me keep you. Hi back, and feel free to continue the conversation any time.
User avatar #503 to #502 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
Hello again.
#504 to #503 - miia ONLINE (01/09/2015) [-]
hello

i am exhausted
User avatar #490 - commencingfailure (09/30/2014) [-]
******* retard compares the IS to today's feminists. One could say ignorance is an everspreading cancer, you did your job to increase the spread.
User avatar #491 to #490 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/30/2014) [-]
You seem REALLY mad, friend. Perhaps you should calm down and take some ass ointment before you need to see a doctor
User avatar #489 - myfourthaccount (07/18/2014) [-]
dude, you're like my most favorite person on earth right now haha
User avatar #487 - imvlad (05/04/2014) [-]
you brought shame to your house
User avatar #483 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Have you by chance had an older account here before?
User avatar #484 to #483 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes I have. My first username was Hiimquinn, but it was deleted for some reason I never found, so I just made another.
#485 to #484 - aerosol ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Oh. Never mind then. I saw someone call you Dave and I mistook you for someone else.
User avatar #486 to #485 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
It's fine. It was a joke from a picture a while back where a man was looking out the window and saw a dog and his owner walking down the street. The dog barked at another, bigger dog, and his owner just turned and said "See, this is why you have no ******* mates, Dave".
User avatar #481 - iforgotmyothername (03/20/2014) [-]
you are one cool tempered potato compared to me, bringing my fury upon your wrongness. i salute you, and thumbed up all your comments in the a capella debate.
User avatar #482 to #481 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/20/2014) [-]
It's alright, I apologize for making you upset, but you don't need to thumb my posts up. Thumbs are a way to express positivity or negativity toward any type of comments; if you do not like them, it is perfectly within your right to thumb them down.
User avatar #474 - aherorising (11/20/2013) [-]
you're a really cool bro
#471 - shiifter (10/06/2013) [-]
This still makes me giggle.

Oh and by the way, i never actually thumbed you down. I just said that i did.
User avatar #472 to #471 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
The thing is, the way I found OUT you gave me those thumbs was because of the question mark, which allows people to see who voted on content. I could only KNOW it was you if you had thumbed them down, which you did.

And now you not only prove to be an idiot, but a liar as well.
#473 to #472 - shiifter (10/12/2013) [-]
Wait? You still remembered that? That's hilarious.

By the way, i screencapped this. it's like a trophy.
User avatar #468 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
I would just like to say thank you.
User avatar #469 to #468 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (09/22/2013) [-]
For?
#466 - Ken M (08/25/2013) [-]
Due to your pointlessly rude comment on the post "Jesus ain't got time for **** ",

I have gone through 20 of your previous comments and thumbed them all down.

You're also a stupid, unfunny, tryhard feelfag. Exactly the kind of user that this site is infamous for.
User avatar #467 to #466 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (08/25/2013) [-]
I wasn't pointlessly rude. If you read it more carefully, you would find I am not insulting your god or faith, but rather, the people who spread it about; and even they are just doing it to themselves, while I am mearly making an observation

It's ironic you call me tryhard, considering you just went through the time to thumb-down my last 20 comments as if it would have any effect on me personally or my ranking here. It's also odd you call me stupid, considering you were the one who read it uncorrectly. And I think the fact I have so many comment thumbs anyways (including my own jesus comment) speaks to the point that I am, in fact, quite hilarious. "Feelfag", is that supposed to be a derogatory term for someone who is passionate about certain things? If so, then I take pride in it, as it is only through passion that things grow.

Considering you are pretentious, arrogant, immature, and without a sense of humour; you fit the criteria for '12 year old funnyjunker' far better than I do.
#463 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.   
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.   
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.   
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
Hey, I would just like to say thank you for telling me to get an account.
Yea I know, odd thing to give thanks for when I could have gotten one easily but then again, I was a dumb bastard then and could not think very well.
I notice your comments from time to time and get some good knowledge off of them, mainly the Lovecraft related ones.
But like I said, thank you very much and continue to be awesome.
User avatar #464 to #463 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
You are just a wonderful person, you know that? Thank you very much for your kind words and appreciation, and I'm glad you have made an account and made many friends here, including myself
#465 to #464 - captainspankmonkey (07/16/2013) [-]
You're welcome, good sir.
You're welcome, good sir.
[ 508 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)