Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

caesarslegion    

Rank #4061 on Content
caesarslegion Avatar Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to caesarslegion Block caesarslegion Invite caesarslegion to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/17/2012
Last Login:9/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4061
Comment Ranking:#9343
Highest Content Rank:#3725
Highest Comment Rank:#2018
Content Thumbs: 1985 total,  2290 ,  305
Comment Thumbs: 4138 total,  9886 ,  5748
Content Level Progress: 15% (15/100)
Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 120 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 28% (28/100)
Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 242 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:98091
Times Content Favorited:125 times
Total Comments Made:2361
FJ Points:6305
Favorite Tags: dark (2) | Josh (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 43408
    Thumbs Up 1543 Thumbs Down 162 Total: +1381
    Comments: 68
    Favorites: 92
    Uploaded: 11/27/12
    Red Dawn Red Dawn
  • Views: 20695
    Thumbs Up 250 Thumbs Down 33 Total: +217
    Comments: 112
    Favorites: 9
    Uploaded: 02/19/13
    Really? Really?
  • Views: 12956
    Thumbs Up 227 Thumbs Down 16 Total: +211
    Comments: 35
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 08/22/14
    A kind, generous soul A kind, generous soul
  • Views: 8896
    Thumbs Up 132 Thumbs Down 21 Total: +111
    Comments: 12
    Favorites: 15
    Uploaded: 08/30/14
    Pomf =3! Pomf =3!
  • Views: 3500
    Thumbs Up 35 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +26
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 08/22/14
    The Wailing Negro The Wailing Negro
  • Views: 2908
    Thumbs Up 28 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +23
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 03/03/13
    Calibrations Calibrations

latest user's comments

#23 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 4 hours ago on At least they tried +21
User avatar #24 - rogaa (4 hours ago) [-]
that gif actually makes me lol
#29 - penileburglar (3 hours ago) [-]
Whoa man, jokes about human remains are alright, but using 'made me lol' in a sentence is taking things too far.
#37 - gentlemen. 4 hours ago on When you remember the pizza... +2
#98 - Still waiting on the **** versions.  [+] (1 new reply) 5 hours ago on LOSERS #5 - Everyone Dyes... +2
#117 - RedHulk (3 hours ago) [-]
**RedHulk rolled image** Join the club we got jackets with leather sleeves.
#12 - Picture 09/18/2014 on What girls love +1
#11 - Mounting evidence process global warming to be false …  [+] (19 new replies) 09/17/2014 on DYK Comp #54 -9
User avatar #17 - Mortuus (09/17/2014) [-]
Yeah, no. It doesn't.
User avatar #29 - lean (09/17/2014) [-]
According to NASA satellites and all ground-based temperature measurements, global warming ceased in the late 1990s. This when CO2 levels have risen almost 10 percent since 1997. The post-1997 CO2 emissions represent an astonishing 30 percent of all human-related emissions since the Industrial Revolution began. That we’ve seen no warming contradicts all CO2-based climate models upon which global-warming concerns are founded.

Rates of sea-level rise remain small and are even slowing, over recent decades averaging about 1 millimeter per year as measured by tide gauges and 2 to 3 mm/year as inferred from “adjusted” satellite data. Again, this is far less than what the alarmists suggested.

 Satellites also show that a greater area of Antarctic sea ice exists now than any time since space-based measurements began in 1979. In other words, the ice caps aren’t melting.

Federal anti-climate-change spending is now running at $11 billion a year, plus tax breaks of $20 billion a year. That adds up to more than double the $14.4 billion worth of wheat produced in the United States in 2013.

Dr. Bjørn Lomborg, director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, a supporter of the UN’s climate science, notes that this would buy imperceptible improvement: “After spending all that money, we would not even be able to tell the difference.”

Excerpts from an article by Tom Harris, exec director of Ottowa's International Climate Science Coalition, and Bob Carter, former head of Earth Sciences at James Cook Uni. Titled Leo vs. Science: Vanishing evidence for climate change.
User avatar #103 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
You shouldn't try to use an organization as support when they are actually saying the opposite of what you are:

climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

The rest of what you says doesn't really warrant a response since I doubt you'd change your mind, I just felt the need to respond to that incorrect factoid.
User avatar #146 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
What is really mind blowing to me is you accept what a group like Nasa says immediately, and discount hundreds of credible and knowledgeable scientists who object, not to the existence of climate change, but to the alarmist theories and that it is going to destroy the planet. It is not the largest danger we face by any means.
#149 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
It's not that I accept what NASA says immediately; every major science organization on the planet agrees with anthropomorphic climate change, the greenhouse effect from gasses is a well documented phenomenon that you can prove through simple experiments that you do yourself (I did an experiment on it as an 8th grader), and the only scientists that dispute anthropomorphic climate change either A) are not trained in anything even tangentially related to climate, or B) are on oil or coal companies' payrolls. Nothing you said changes that.

It won't destroy the planet, and I can't think of a single scientists who has claimed as such, though you're welcome to list some. It will, however, cause severe problems with ecosystems and weather patterns, cause widespread famine due to these issues with the weather patterns and ecosystems, cause large scale extinctions, especially in marine life due to ocean acidification, and lower the quality of life for billions of people on the planet. It's definitely the largest immediate issue that we face close seconds of the die-off of honey bees and the possibility of nuclear annihilation, and also coincidentally is directly due to our own actions just like the other two.

I'll address your other comment here as well: 140 years is an extremely fast rate of climate change. Natural climate change takes anywhere from tens of thousands of years to millions of years to occur, but we have sped it up to a small fraction of the time. This means that the planet's biosphere can not adapt to the slow change as it normally does, and that will have global negative consequences. The only thing you've proved here is that you don't understand that time frames apply differently to the planet than they do to us. Additionally, an increase of .5 *C translates to about 2-3 *C increase on land since that is a global average that factors in the ocean's ability as a heat sink. That means that the estimated global temp increases will be equal to 4-10 *C.
User avatar #144 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
Do you know of another agency that has satellite imaging and worldwide temperature sensors? Hint: everyone uses Nasa information. My point is they post the raw data and lie about what it means, when the truth is apparent to anyone who digs into it. They skew the data and shorten time frames in their charts to make it appear that rapid global warming and rising sea levels are extreme when in face we are experiencing miniscule increases which have been slowing down for the last 15 years, despite the alarmist climate agenda.
#145 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
>lie about what it means

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh noes, da ebul gubmint and science is lying to us!!!!11 Goood job, you found da conspuracy! All the world's scientists came together just to lie about this one bit. But you still missed out on the lizard people so you failed in the end.
#147 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
140 years. .6 degrees. That's what the graph shows, but if you take away the numbers, jeez that thing is rocketing upwards! We need to panic!
Why do they design the graph to look like extreme temperature increase when it simply isn't extreme?
#148 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
This shows the last 100,000 years, and is far more informative. Let me tell you, if the average temperatures from 40-60 thousand years ago were what we experience today, I would be buried under miles of ice (MN). Thank global warming that I only have to deal with that in the winter now.
User avatar #150 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
Your own unsourced graph just reinforces what I said: that this period of anthropomorphic climate change is ludicrously and unnaturally fast compared to previous periods of natural climate change.
#151 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
So you are saying that our modern global warming was started by us 12,000 years ago? That first red dot is the Quaternary extinction event. (wooly Mammoth).

All these charts come direct from Berkely University's independent study of climate change. Here muller.lbl.gov/pages/iceagebook/history_of_climate.html

How about the last 400,000 years?
Sorry for the GIFs. Visit the page
User avatar #154 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
"But the foundation for thinking that human effects will cause warming is substantial. Even if the recent rise in temperature is natural, human caused effects have a high probability of dominating in the near future, and within our lifetimes the temperature of the Earth could go higher than has ever seen previously by Homo sapiens."

From the link you just sent me. Not to mention that this is one scientist operating off of data from a single core sample from 1993. This is interesting, but what he said is still in line with what I said. Also, are you planning to respond to my other response at all? It addresses the point you are trying to address with these graphs in more detail.
#152 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
10,000 years
#153 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
2,400 years.

Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a conspiracy theorist, the government wants whats best for the planet, and the data isn't skewed to alarm and dismay people into spending more money on going green. The facts speak for themselves.
User avatar #42 - ojollie (09/17/2014) [-]
Rather than quoting a couple articles, here's NASAs own webpage on the evidence for climate change: climate.nasa.gov/evidence/.

'Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.'
#70 - lean (09/17/2014) [-]
Every single major headline on that page is in dispute or has been downright disproven.
Even that graph is flawed to only show an insignificant portion of the life bearing period on this planet. It shows less than 1%.
The sea level rise is negligible in the last 10 years.
Global temperature hasn't risen in almost 20, even though CO2 has tripled. wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/08/3-of-4-global-metrics-show-nearly-flat-temperature-anomaly-in-the-last-decade/
Oceanic warming is a theory in dispute.
The ice sheets are 17% greater than they were 10 years ago.
Arctic sea is is currently the largest it has been since satellite imagery.
Extreme events? The latest IPCC report suggests that a warming climate will precipitate a decline in overall extreme weather patterns.
Oceanic acidification has given rise to a veritable army of algaes that consume more CO2 than the remaining trees in the amazon.
#105 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
You figured out the great conspiracy, but you didn't realize that the lizard people were behind it the whole time. I give you a B overall.
User avatar #71 - ojollie (09/17/2014) [-]
What are you suggesting? That there's a huge conspiracy and NASA and over 95% of the worlds scientific institutions are lying? Or that your interweb sleuthing has uncovered scientific data previously unavailable to said institutions?
User avatar #143 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
Nasa is undoubtedly skewing information to make it look worse than it actually is. I am not denying climate change by any means, but it is not the apocalyptic eminent disaster that some would have you believe. Nasa is funded by the US gov, who by their own admission have stated that the hundreds of billions they spend on climate change control every year have an insignificant effect, but they still push it forward. What's the point?
#314 - The Squalid Queen summons Velstadt because she is a child of d… 09/14/2014 on Is it thought? 0
#164 - Plague Dogs isn't that bad. Aside from the beginning scene, th… 09/13/2014 on not all animated movies are... 0
#66 - It's SUCH A BETTER ENDING TOO!! Like, in EVERYWAY. But they RE… 09/13/2014 on The most beautiful thing ever +8
#133 - Picture 09/13/2014 on not all animated movies are... -4
#132 - I was about to ******** about how only baby-men c… 09/13/2014 on not all animated movies are... -6

user's channels

Join Subscribe darksoulstime
Join Subscribe fallout
Join Subscribe morbid-channel

user's friends

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2050

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #36 - demjimmies (07/19/2013) [-]
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!
User avatar #37 to #36 - caesarslegion (07/19/2013) [-]
you know why?

BECAUSE WE'RE TUNNEL SNAKES, AND WE RULE!!
User avatar #35 - mayormilkman (04/12/2013) [-]
I like your icon.
#34 - anonymous (04/09/2013) [-]
Did you defeat those dogs of the NCR?
User avatar #29 - txniko (03/21/2013) [-]
Awe,true to Caesar.
User avatar #31 to #30 - txniko (03/21/2013) [-]
D: I'm so sorry.

Don't enslave me.
User avatar #32 to #31 - caesarslegion (03/21/2013) [-]
No, I won't grant you that privilege.


To the cross with you.
#33 to #32 - txniko (03/21/2013) [-]
pls no
pls no
#25 - ragnarfag (03/18/2013) [-]
Ceasar's legion you say?
User avatar #26 to #25 - caesarslegion (03/18/2013) [-]
No, no, no...

Silly!


That was the Greeks.
User avatar #27 to #26 - ragnarfag (03/18/2013) [-]
"fresh ass fag" or "fag ass fresh"?
#24 - ragnarfag has deleted their comment [-]
#15 - artyommetro ONLINE (08/24/2012) [-]
Your name is awesome
User avatar #16 to #15 - caesarslegion (08/28/2012) [-]
Good to see a fellow legionnaire.
#17 to #16 - artyommetro ONLINE (08/28/2012) [-]
I was up until the mission i had to get rid of the brotherhood of steel i have more love for them then anyone still hate the NCR to hell and back
User avatar #18 to #17 - caesarslegion (08/28/2012) [-]
Shame, though the Legion uses the Enclave Remnants.
#19 to #18 - artyommetro ONLINE (08/29/2012) [-]
Well there was that and a woman could not do that much in his army i liked there way of doing things it would work but just mix it up a bit and it would be perfect and the Enclave kind of sort of the Brotherhoods biggest enemy
User avatar #20 to #19 - caesarslegion (08/29/2012) [-]
Enclave has always been my favorite faction in the Fallout series, it really made me upset that you could never join them or anything. That's why in F:NV I got so excited because they let you join the Remnants.
User avatar #21 to #20 - artyommetro ONLINE (08/30/2012) [-]
they were ok in the first two games but in the third after they killed James i just went on a killing spree hitting them everywhere i found them
User avatar #22 to #21 - caesarslegion (08/30/2012) [-]
Trial by Fire bro, the Enclave believe that the only way to restore the old world is by letting the strongest survive, mutants do no, and cannot have a place in the world if we are to restore the world. Not to mention, if you read the Enclave Officer diaries and Journals you learn that they gave everyone a chance, Ghouls, Raiders, Super Mutants, but all of them attacked the Enclave so they had no choice. They realize that trial by fire is the only way to keep the strong and the smart, and to root out the weak.
#23 to #22 - artyommetro ONLINE (08/30/2012) [-]
True i looked into that today actually nut another problem they have if they think of the old way to much the way the world used to run will never work again until the world if fixed a bit more
#3 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #4 to #3 - caesarslegion (05/24/2012) [-]
then fall Caesar?
#5 to #4 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #6 to #5 - caesarslegion (05/24/2012) [-]
More Shakespeare than actual history.

In real life, we can only speculate that Caesar managed to say; "et tu Brute?" but then you have to realize, Caesar got stabbed 37 times with Gladius', the Roman sword. That's some significant damage, and I'd be surprised if he lived for more then a few minutes afterwards.
#7 to #6 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #8 to #7 - caesarslegion (05/24/2012) [-]
Nope Brutus and the other Senators ganged up on him and stabbed him to death, then left him to die under the statue of Pompey, the previous leader Caesar killed to assume power over Rome.
#9 to #8 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #10 to #9 - caesarslegion (05/24/2012) [-]
Well the only reason they got all pissy and killed him was because they were corrupt as hell and Caesar had planned to remove them of all their power so they couldn't rob from the Roman people anymore.
#11 to #10 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #12 to #11 - caesarslegion (05/24/2012) [-]
He was, which in term would remove the Senators from power.
#13 to #12 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #14 to #13 - caesarslegion (05/24/2012) [-]
Sure thing.
 Friends (0)