Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

bronytarek    

Rank #37202 on Subscribers
bronytarek Avatar Level -60 Content: disliked
Offline
Send mail to bronytarek Block bronytarek Invite bronytarek to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/09/2012
Last Login:5/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 60 total,  150 ,  210
Comment Thumbs: 56 total,  584 ,  640
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -60 Content: disliked → Level -59 Content: disliked
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -156 Comment: starting to be hated → Level -155 Comment: starting to be hated
Subscribers:1
Content Views:9452
Times Content Favorited:9 times
Total Comments Made:325
FJ Points:-130

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 1628
    Thumbs Up 32 Thumbs Down 32 Total: 0
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 03/27/12
    Watermelons Watermelons
  • Views: 1460
    Thumbs Up 21 Thumbs Down 21 Total: 0
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 4
    Uploaded: 01/26/12
    If history had a Facebook If history had a Facebook
  • Views: 952
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 19 Total: -1
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/20/12
    9faggette! 9faggette!
  • Views: 446
    Thumbs Up 19 Thumbs Down 22 Total: -3
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 01/09/12
    Bragging Bragging
  • Views: 985
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 11 Total: -5
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/10/12
    Bad luck Brian Bad luck Brian
  • Views: 906
    Thumbs Up 16 Thumbs Down 27 Total: -11
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/20/12
    (1) Facebook (1) Facebook
1 2 > [ 7 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#14 - that's just cruel .. 12/18/2012 on He was later eaten -1
#26 - Other than, that approx. 30% of Persian vocabulary (Heard from… 12/18/2012 on Shalom motherfucker! 0
#232 - I actually don't know a lot about vikings, i just know, that w…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/18/2012 on Glorious Norwegians Master... -1
#234 - kdiddlid (12/18/2012) [-]
the main difference between the 3 viking countries were the routes they pillaged on, and the time they went into trade.
(can't remember everything thou).
Norway went to great Britain allot, also Denmark (mostly trade) and some of the coast of Europe.
Swedes had mostly conquests in eastern-europe etc.
The Danish vikings i think were mainly trade with the mainland and other viking tribes.

far as i know, the NO vikings were known as the most bloodthirsty, because we ended up in trade after the Swedes (when Christianity came around).

Thats all i remember from school ^_^
User avatar #315 - mesr (12/18/2012) [-]
Partly right in that they took different routes. It was the danes and the norwegians who invaded Britian. The norwegians settled mostly in the northern parts of Scotland and the islands, whereas it was a combination of danish and norwegian vikings who invaded the saxon lands in central Britain. The part would be known as Danelagen under a danish king, Guthrum/Æthelstan.
#228 - sure sure  [+] (4 new replies) 12/18/2012 on Glorious Norwegians Master... -1
User avatar #230 - magnusos (12/18/2012) [-]
And i think they were the most active. At least when it comes to the UK area and the northern parts like iceland and greenland
User avatar #232 - bronytarek (12/18/2012) [-]
I actually don't know a lot about vikings, i just know, that when i was taught this in school, they never really mentioned distinctions between swedish, norwegian or danish vikings. All i know is that the icelandic vikings were the ones who reached america. dunno
#234 - kdiddlid (12/18/2012) [-]
the main difference between the 3 viking countries were the routes they pillaged on, and the time they went into trade.
(can't remember everything thou).
Norway went to great Britain allot, also Denmark (mostly trade) and some of the coast of Europe.
Swedes had mostly conquests in eastern-europe etc.
The Danish vikings i think were mainly trade with the mainland and other viking tribes.

far as i know, the NO vikings were known as the most bloodthirsty, because we ended up in trade after the Swedes (when Christianity came around).

Thats all i remember from school ^_^
User avatar #315 - mesr (12/18/2012) [-]
Partly right in that they took different routes. It was the danes and the norwegians who invaded Britian. The norwegians settled mostly in the northern parts of Scotland and the islands, whereas it was a combination of danish and norwegian vikings who invaded the saxon lands in central Britain. The part would be known as Danelagen under a danish king, Guthrum/Æthelstan.
#225 - The Danes and the Swedes were also vikings ya kno  [+] (6 new replies) 12/18/2012 on Glorious Norwegians Master... 0
User avatar #227 - magnusos (12/18/2012) [-]
Still... Norwegian viking are way cooler :D
User avatar #228 - bronytarek (12/18/2012) [-]
sure sure
User avatar #230 - magnusos (12/18/2012) [-]
And i think they were the most active. At least when it comes to the UK area and the northern parts like iceland and greenland
User avatar #232 - bronytarek (12/18/2012) [-]
I actually don't know a lot about vikings, i just know, that when i was taught this in school, they never really mentioned distinctions between swedish, norwegian or danish vikings. All i know is that the icelandic vikings were the ones who reached america. dunno
#234 - kdiddlid (12/18/2012) [-]
the main difference between the 3 viking countries were the routes they pillaged on, and the time they went into trade.
(can't remember everything thou).
Norway went to great Britain allot, also Denmark (mostly trade) and some of the coast of Europe.
Swedes had mostly conquests in eastern-europe etc.
The Danish vikings i think were mainly trade with the mainland and other viking tribes.

far as i know, the NO vikings were known as the most bloodthirsty, because we ended up in trade after the Swedes (when Christianity came around).

Thats all i remember from school ^_^
User avatar #315 - mesr (12/18/2012) [-]
Partly right in that they took different routes. It was the danes and the norwegians who invaded Britian. The norwegians settled mostly in the northern parts of Scotland and the islands, whereas it was a combination of danish and norwegian vikings who invaded the saxon lands in central Britain. The part would be known as Danelagen under a danish king, Guthrum/Æthelstan.
#3941 - .. 12/17/2012 on Thumb Orgy +4
#33 - Sauce? 12/15/2012 on Is this possible? 0
#83 - I can't tell whether it's swedish or norwegian, but I'd guess swedish.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2012 on Cat Politely Asks for... 0
User avatar #84 - mcfriture (12/15/2012) [-]
yup
#81 - Canadian cat.  [+] (4 new replies) 12/15/2012 on Cat Politely Asks for... 0
User avatar #82 - mcfriture (12/15/2012) [-]
swedish cat
User avatar #94 - laxxy (12/15/2012) [-]
*norwegian
User avatar #83 - bronytarek (12/15/2012) [-]
I can't tell whether it's swedish or norwegian, but I'd guess swedish.
User avatar #84 - mcfriture (12/15/2012) [-]
yup
#351 - Yeah, and they need to understand, different things matter to …  [+] (10 new replies) 12/15/2012 on Urban guide : Headphones 0
User avatar #353 - noopis (12/15/2012) [-]
Yeah everybody wants to be hardcore about everything "You bought Beats?! You fool! They have terrible sound quality compared to my obscure brand of headphones! Get out of my sight you filthy casual!" That's how they all sound to me. Not everyone is a music producer, some people do want nice looking headphones that have a decent sound quality to them.
User avatar #367 - noopis (12/15/2012) [-]
And these people shouldn't be taken seriously. What they do is like someone going up to you and saying "You eat cake?! Cake isn't a true dessert! Faggot! Only douchebags eat cake!" You wouldn't take that person seriously and it's no less ridiculous when they say it about headphones. If they have criticisms they should put them forth but instead they just throw insults simply because it's what's popular right now.
#500 - calibratuner (12/15/2012) [-]
Lol what? Actually i suggest to people they spend their money on other headphones because beats =/= quality. Other brands out there sound better for cheaper, with better build quality. Sennheiser for example?

You sound like a fagot who has a pair of beats headphones because he has to be "Stylish". Not what you actually like the look of.

And seriously, nice try at using big words to make yourself sound cool.
User avatar #750 - noopis (12/15/2012) [-]
I don't own a pair of Beats. And it's people like you who bash what's popular just to look cool, people like you do the same thing with Apple products. We get it you're so well versed in technology and shit. I really don't give a shit about that nonsense anymore. Like I said not everyone is a music producer, some people value aesthetics over the sound quality. You sound like a hipster douche. If you're gonna judge people don't base it on what fucking brand they buy. And I'm not using big words to sound cool that's just my vocabulary which is another baseless attack on me that is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. It just shows you have no argument to make so go fuck off, argue with some other hipster douche.
#792 - calibratuner (12/17/2012) [-]
You are making generalized arguments towards anyone jackass. I never, EVER said i judge somebody because they buy a pair of beats, i merely said i suggest to people that they go to other brands because as i said, The cost to performance ratio of the Dre Beats is not all that great compared to other headphones. And music producers are the only ones that buy expensive headphones? And IMO why the fuck would you spend more on headphones for aesthetics and lose out on better sound quality for less? Don't get me wrong, if that is your thing go for it, it is just a bit silly. Funnily enough, your right i do not purchase any apple products, why? They are overpriced, Proprietary to hell and back, and i can build computers that are just as good for less. (I am a desktop user). Now before you start bashing shit to me about being a hipster, i am a technician and i rather like being able to replace,upgrade, and repair my machine and/or parts and not cost me an arm and a leg to do so. As for every other apple product they do less than other android phones/tablets can do. And apple costs more? LOL yeah fuck that. The only device that would appeal to me is the iPod classic, purely for the reason that it holds 160gb of music and for me, thats all i need an MP3 player to do, i have my phone for everything else, like games, movies, apps.

As for your argument that i am a "Hipster Douche" with baseless remarks, i do not buy headphones for aesthetics, i buy headphones for the quality of them. So i am not a hipster, as for the douche part, im not a whiny bitch that you seem to be, as you will bash anyone who says beats are not that great, and make wild generalizations about stupid shit. I may be an asshole, but i sure as hell am not a "hipster douche".
As far as my remarks being baseless? Perhaps you think before you speak and learn that you may offend other people with your words.

I will apologize for my rudeness before and now. But i take offense to those generalizations.
#793 - calibratuner (12/17/2012) [-]
I lost a part of my arguement in the wall.

Music producers: Some people like to enjoy the full range of the music, the way it was recorded, and be able to pick out different instruments or sounds. It is much more immersive.

Quite like how people prefer 7.1 Surround Sound systems over stereo audio systems.

Like to add as well, as an electronics salesman, many people like to have my take on the quality of headphones. People appreciate getting told that other brands are as good, if not better than beats for less. Many people jump straight to beats because everything thinks they are better than Bose headphone wise.
User avatar #794 - noopis (12/18/2012) [-]
Now you fucking reply?! My shit was 2 days ago nigga. It's over. Move on.
User avatar #795 - noopis (12/18/2012) [-]
And I'm fucking tired, I had a long day today I just wanna chill, I'm not about to read that whole wall of China you got there just so I can argue with you.
#796 - calibratuner (12/19/2012) [-]
Some of us have a, well u know, a life.
User avatar #797 - noopis (12/19/2012) [-]
Just fuck off.
[ 325 Total ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - treehuggerkiller (01/10/2012) [-]
lololoololoololol newRon Paul haterget XD
 Friends (0)