brobathehutt
Rank #527 on Comments
Offline
Send mail to brobathehutt Block brobathehutt Invite brobathehutt to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Age: | 114 |
| Date Signed Up: | 8/09/2013 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| Location: | Long ago in a galaxy far away |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #527 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #13750 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #524 |
| Content Thumbs: | 0 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 7527 |
| Content Level Progress: | 6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 71% (71/100) Level 260 Comments: Pure Win → Level 261 Comments: Pure Win |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Content Views: | 952 |
| Total Comments Made: | 2562 |
| FJ Points: | 6094 |
latest user's comments
| #4 - I'm saying you're as bad as the twilight fans, if not worse be… [+] (3 new replies) | 01/20/2014 on I said this to my mother | +4 |
| | ||
| #22 - I found that funnier than I should have | 01/20/2014 on one....two....patato | +1 |
| #74 - Picture | 01/20/2014 on Canada | +1 |
| #220 - In English we say "my bitch" which roughly translate… | 01/20/2014 on As a Finn, this is accurate | +4 |
| #2 - Hurr durr lets beat a dead horse and at the same time try to p… [+] (11 new replies) | 01/20/2014 on I said this to my mother | +61 |
| unless you hate on the last airbender. if you even think of something bad about that shitty cartoon you get showered in red thumbs Hating on good shows in never popular but hating on the obnoxious fans of good shows is always popular I'm saying you're as bad as the twilight fans, if not worse because I don't have to fucking deal with them at all anymore but I'm still stuck with you nitwits. | ||
| #17 - Picture | 01/20/2014 on Monopoly | +3 |
| #236 - Uh huh. You must be such a great guy I can see you swimming in… | 01/19/2014 on they have curved swords | +2 |
| #116 - Oh look. Racism. Go **** yourself. | 01/19/2014 on The Juan who did it | 0 |
| #6 - Dicks and armpit vaginas? [+] (5 new replies) | 01/19/2014 on 3 things according to 4chan | +4 |
| Love your Silent Bob picture. One of my favorite movies of all time. | ||
| #83 - Well you're a cute cunt of a virgin aren't you? [+] (2 new replies) | 01/19/2014 on they have curved swords | +3 |
| #91 -
anon (01/19/2014) [-] I'm not a virgin... I don't see how that would even matter but alright. I'm not going to lie and say I have sex every single fucking day... not even every week lol but I do just fine. You act like I would actually say shit like this to a girl. I would not. That's stupid. If I did they wouldn't have sex with me. So I lie and pretend like I give a fuck what they have to say and they believe it. Uh huh. You must be such a great guy I can see you swimming in pussy. I seriously doubt you've had sex, just a hunch. | ||
| #82 - Just realized that's Skyrim's way of saying you're a virgin. | 01/19/2014 on they have curved swords | +7 |
| #31 - gracias. | 01/18/2014 on Some people have all the... | +1 |
| #27 - How the hell do you check what the flagged image was again? [+] (3 new replies) | 01/18/2014 on Some people have all the... | +1 |
| | ||
| #359 - Given that dogs can easily eat low quality meat (considering t… | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| #358 - You haven't heard of Nature's design, thus why I'm not explain… | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| #326 - *their intelligence | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| #325 - You've never heard of nature's design? Then nevermind I won't … [+] (3 new replies) | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| Okay let's break this into pieces shall we. >Nature's design Again, Nature doesn't design. Traits evolve, and more useful traits flourish, and less useful ones perish. The context you are using it however, is in one of purpose. Which isn't the case in nature. >Been omnivores forever. That doesn't make any sense. It's like saying "we've been human since forever". > The only reason...is best to be able to sustain yourself. Again, doesn't really make sense. It's like saying "we arn't carnivores because we are omnivores". >Caring about other species above... Never said this. In fact I said specifically that humans came above other animals. You haven't heard of Nature's design, thus why I'm not explaining it (you'll see what I mean someday on that one). We haven't been human forever, however the ancestors we directly descended from were all omnivores. Let me clarify. The reason we became omnivores instead of just being carnivores (and yes we would of become carnivores) is because in nature it is good to be able to eat the surrounding flora while you're waiting for an animal to come around to kill or while running after the animal you're hunting. Fine you didn't say to care about other species above humans, I was connecting you with the other retarded vegans I see all the time. Also you didn't say humans were above animals you said that we care more about other humans than animals, but even that realistically doesn't tell me whether or not you care more about humans than other animals. | ||
| #318 - We're designed by nature. We're a very adaptive species and we… [+] (5 new replies) | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| We aren't designed by nature. Design implies purpose before the traits emerge. This is not the case. We can survive off a diet of meat and plants. This says nothing about what our diet should be. Not eating meat isn't "going against our nature", not eating meat is intrisic to our ability to adapt and survive. As for why we should care more about animals? For the same reason we can more about humans than other animals. Or for a whale more than a snail. And as a point, I would also like to see the cessation of killing plants for food as well. But one step at a time. You've never heard of nature's design? Then nevermind I won't bother explaining that one to you because obviously we have bigger issues to tackle. Yes, not eating meat is going against our nature, considering we've been omnivores forever. The only reason why we aren't carnivores is because it is best to be able to be able to sustain yourself on the minor amount of nutrition gained from plants when you aren't able to get any meat. Otherwise we would be carnivores, seeing as meat tends to be the healthiest and most efficient way of getting the necessary nutrients. No I don't quite understand how you expect us to start caring about other species over our own fucking species. I also don't particularly care how smart an animal is they can't fucking do anything productive to our society with our intelligence. I know you're sheltered but please try to live in reality. Okay let's break this into pieces shall we. >Nature's design Again, Nature doesn't design. Traits evolve, and more useful traits flourish, and less useful ones perish. The context you are using it however, is in one of purpose. Which isn't the case in nature. >Been omnivores forever. That doesn't make any sense. It's like saying "we've been human since forever". > The only reason...is best to be able to sustain yourself. Again, doesn't really make sense. It's like saying "we arn't carnivores because we are omnivores". >Caring about other species above... Never said this. In fact I said specifically that humans came above other animals. You haven't heard of Nature's design, thus why I'm not explaining it (you'll see what I mean someday on that one). We haven't been human forever, however the ancestors we directly descended from were all omnivores. Let me clarify. The reason we became omnivores instead of just being carnivores (and yes we would of become carnivores) is because in nature it is good to be able to eat the surrounding flora while you're waiting for an animal to come around to kill or while running after the animal you're hunting. Fine you didn't say to care about other species above humans, I was connecting you with the other retarded vegans I see all the time. Also you didn't say humans were above animals you said that we care more about other humans than animals, but even that realistically doesn't tell me whether or not you care more about humans than other animals. | ||
| #314 - We're Omnivores by nature. We are designed to eat meat and veg… [+] (7 new replies) | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| >Designed. That's where you went wrong. And animals are alive. They react to the enviroment, they are aware, they build attachments, and they have emotions. Most animals are, for the most part, comparable to babies. And before you bring up how only the more inteligent animals are socially aware. The animals we eat are among the most inteligent and socially aware. We're designed by nature. We're a very adaptive species and we evolve relatively quickly, what's your point? (No I'm not a creationist). Animals are alive. So are plants. They also react to the environment. And they produce oxygen. I don't see why I should particularly care more for the animals. We aren't designed by nature. Design implies purpose before the traits emerge. This is not the case. We can survive off a diet of meat and plants. This says nothing about what our diet should be. Not eating meat isn't "going against our nature", not eating meat is intrisic to our ability to adapt and survive. As for why we should care more about animals? For the same reason we can more about humans than other animals. Or for a whale more than a snail. And as a point, I would also like to see the cessation of killing plants for food as well. But one step at a time. You've never heard of nature's design? Then nevermind I won't bother explaining that one to you because obviously we have bigger issues to tackle. Yes, not eating meat is going against our nature, considering we've been omnivores forever. The only reason why we aren't carnivores is because it is best to be able to be able to sustain yourself on the minor amount of nutrition gained from plants when you aren't able to get any meat. Otherwise we would be carnivores, seeing as meat tends to be the healthiest and most efficient way of getting the necessary nutrients. No I don't quite understand how you expect us to start caring about other species over our own fucking species. I also don't particularly care how smart an animal is they can't fucking do anything productive to our society with our intelligence. I know you're sheltered but please try to live in reality. Okay let's break this into pieces shall we. >Nature's design Again, Nature doesn't design. Traits evolve, and more useful traits flourish, and less useful ones perish. The context you are using it however, is in one of purpose. Which isn't the case in nature. >Been omnivores forever. That doesn't make any sense. It's like saying "we've been human since forever". > The only reason...is best to be able to sustain yourself. Again, doesn't really make sense. It's like saying "we arn't carnivores because we are omnivores". >Caring about other species above... Never said this. In fact I said specifically that humans came above other animals. You haven't heard of Nature's design, thus why I'm not explaining it (you'll see what I mean someday on that one). We haven't been human forever, however the ancestors we directly descended from were all omnivores. Let me clarify. The reason we became omnivores instead of just being carnivores (and yes we would of become carnivores) is because in nature it is good to be able to eat the surrounding flora while you're waiting for an animal to come around to kill or while running after the animal you're hunting. Fine you didn't say to care about other species above humans, I was connecting you with the other retarded vegans I see all the time. Also you didn't say humans were above animals you said that we care more about other humans than animals, but even that realistically doesn't tell me whether or not you care more about humans than other animals. | ||
| #300 - That's so incredibly stupid it hurts. [+] (9 new replies) | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| We're Omnivores by nature. We are designed to eat meat and vegetables. No government that is governed with the consent of the people will ever have the power to make laws forcing people to go against their nature. Also why the fuck should it be illegal anyway? Animals are nothing but a resource, and before you bring up pets I don't eat my fucking pets I eat the typical food animals. >Designed. That's where you went wrong. And animals are alive. They react to the enviroment, they are aware, they build attachments, and they have emotions. Most animals are, for the most part, comparable to babies. And before you bring up how only the more inteligent animals are socially aware. The animals we eat are among the most inteligent and socially aware. We're designed by nature. We're a very adaptive species and we evolve relatively quickly, what's your point? (No I'm not a creationist). Animals are alive. So are plants. They also react to the environment. And they produce oxygen. I don't see why I should particularly care more for the animals. We aren't designed by nature. Design implies purpose before the traits emerge. This is not the case. We can survive off a diet of meat and plants. This says nothing about what our diet should be. Not eating meat isn't "going against our nature", not eating meat is intrisic to our ability to adapt and survive. As for why we should care more about animals? For the same reason we can more about humans than other animals. Or for a whale more than a snail. And as a point, I would also like to see the cessation of killing plants for food as well. But one step at a time. You've never heard of nature's design? Then nevermind I won't bother explaining that one to you because obviously we have bigger issues to tackle. Yes, not eating meat is going against our nature, considering we've been omnivores forever. The only reason why we aren't carnivores is because it is best to be able to be able to sustain yourself on the minor amount of nutrition gained from plants when you aren't able to get any meat. Otherwise we would be carnivores, seeing as meat tends to be the healthiest and most efficient way of getting the necessary nutrients. No I don't quite understand how you expect us to start caring about other species over our own fucking species. I also don't particularly care how smart an animal is they can't fucking do anything productive to our society with our intelligence. I know you're sheltered but please try to live in reality. Okay let's break this into pieces shall we. >Nature's design Again, Nature doesn't design. Traits evolve, and more useful traits flourish, and less useful ones perish. The context you are using it however, is in one of purpose. Which isn't the case in nature. >Been omnivores forever. That doesn't make any sense. It's like saying "we've been human since forever". > The only reason...is best to be able to sustain yourself. Again, doesn't really make sense. It's like saying "we arn't carnivores because we are omnivores". >Caring about other species above... Never said this. In fact I said specifically that humans came above other animals. You haven't heard of Nature's design, thus why I'm not explaining it (you'll see what I mean someday on that one). We haven't been human forever, however the ancestors we directly descended from were all omnivores. Let me clarify. The reason we became omnivores instead of just being carnivores (and yes we would of become carnivores) is because in nature it is good to be able to eat the surrounding flora while you're waiting for an animal to come around to kill or while running after the animal you're hunting. Fine you didn't say to care about other species above humans, I was connecting you with the other retarded vegans I see all the time. Also you didn't say humans were above animals you said that we care more about other humans than animals, but even that realistically doesn't tell me whether or not you care more about humans than other animals. | ||
| #293 - 11/10 you win | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | +2 |
| #291 - Right blaming the biggest meat eating country for a bunch of i… | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| #289 - Human made dog food isn't really any healthier, but it does co… [+] (2 new replies) | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| Given that dogs can easily eat low quality meat (considering that they will eat every part of any animal they find and also assuming you mean meat that is edible) you would be hard pressed to find a dog chow without meat that could be as good for them as meat is. None the less you've got a fair point. | ||
| #284 - Shut the **** up you moron, there is more to animal sci… [+] (1 new reply) | 01/17/2014 on I agree with this | 0 |
| Ok, and you have the ability to feed your animal tat stuff, I feed my dog meat all the time. What I'm saying is that a dog is still able to survive without eating meat. I just don't get the point in complaining and getting angry because some people treat their dogs differently than you treat yours. It's the same as getting angry because someone spanked their child and you don't agree with that. It's just pointless, you do your thing, they do their thing, it doesn't matter in the end. | ||
| #8 - I find it increasingly porous to detach this conversation. I m… [+] (1 new reply) | 01/17/2014 on Photosynthesis | 0 |
Comments(5):
brobathehutt has disabled anonymous comments.
Refresh Comments Show GIFs 5 comments displayed.
