Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:1/24/2012
Last Login:12/06/2016
Comment Ranking:#6542
Highest Content Rank:#4906
Highest Comment Rank:#555
Content Thumbs: 333 total,  704 ,  371
Comment Thumbs: 9549 total,  14975 ,  5426
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 28 Content: Peasant → Level 29 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 21% (21/100)
Level 275 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 276 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Content Views:68330
Times Content Favorited:8 times
Total Comments Made:4529
FJ Points:7844

latest user's comments

#5 - Can you make a channel called "Bitching about politics ch…  [+] (1 reply) 10/22/2016 on a great idea +3
User avatar
#9 - neppynep (10/22/2016) [-]
Yes but I don't use it.
#6 - "Post national Country" I'm sorry, whose house i…  [+] (1 reply) 10/22/2016 on eh 0
#7 - somecreepyguy (10/22/2016) [-]
It's not so much burning, as has a growing termite problem.
#144 - I never said Russia was gonna start a war with us, MSM polls h…  [+] (1 reply) 10/22/2016 on #ForkHillary 0
User avatar
#145 - Mortuus (10/22/2016) [-]
"you want WW3, nuclear strikes from Russia"

Nah I got what I came for.
#140 - So what you are saying is, Democracy doesn't work unless your …  [+] (3 replies) 10/15/2016 on #ForkHillary -1
User avatar
#142 - Mortuus (10/15/2016) [-]
Someone really reading into that right wing nuttery, huh?

He doesn't even have 50% of eligible voters according to every poll. She's winning. And what the fuck kind of nuttery makes you think Russia is gonna start a war with the US...

Goddamned dude chill out and take a break from your propaganda mills.
#144 - boothead (10/22/2016) [-]
I never said Russia was gonna start a war with us, MSM polls have proven to be false/rigged/flat out lies. Got anything else cucknuts?
User avatar
#145 - Mortuus (10/22/2016) [-]
"you want WW3, nuclear strikes from Russia"

Nah I got what I came for.
#14 - Katie Johnson was proven false day 1, and him and every other …  [+] (3 replies) 10/14/2016 on Digging Deep -4
User avatar
#29 - lolollo (10/15/2016) [-]
What was it proven false by I wonder?

Which mainstream media source?
User avatar
#41 - sketchE (10/15/2016) [-]
well on the list of trustworthy ones, none, because the list is empty
User avatar
#15 - selongb (10/14/2016) [-]
I'm all for bashing Hillary to, but this site has enough of that, Trump needs some love as well.
#12 - Billy will be dead in 1-5 months anyway, but so far everyone T…  [+] (5 replies) 10/14/2016 on Digging Deep -4
User avatar
#13 - selongb (10/14/2016) [-]
He was accused of denying black people housing, which he settled out of court, so no solid proof there.

The Katie Johnson accusation has yet to be settled.

Just to name two
#14 - boothead (10/14/2016) [-]
Katie Johnson was proven false day 1, and him and every other property owner of the city were lumped together in the same case. Seriously you have nothing. Thats a lie, he did say mean things. Also hes been spending Trump Foundation money on personal things. Of course Hillarys been puppeteering the media rigging elections, fucking murdering people outright, threatening the Loretta Lynch, accepting money from those who fund ISIS and has been speaking in private about nuking the fucking Russians. But by all means, please, continue Trump bashing. Its making you look progressive.
User avatar
#29 - lolollo (10/15/2016) [-]
What was it proven false by I wonder?

Which mainstream media source?
User avatar
#41 - sketchE (10/15/2016) [-]
well on the list of trustworthy ones, none, because the list is empty
User avatar
#15 - selongb (10/14/2016) [-]
I'm all for bashing Hillary to, but this site has enough of that, Trump needs some love as well.
#55 - I dont think you realize the severity of this election and how…  [+] (29 replies) 10/14/2016 on How to vote November 8th +30
User avatar
#187 - kayzl (10/15/2016) [-]
>voter fraud is OK when we do it

#182 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
So it's important enough to you for your will to get through that you'd stomp all over the free wills and opinions of other people and thus completely destroying the democratic component to an election?
That's the behavior of a 4 year old!
And i would know seeing as I teach 4 years olds
User avatar
#178 - drakonpunch (10/15/2016) [-]
So you're willing to spread misinformation to rig an election in the favor of what you, from your subjective perspective, believe is best. Does nobody else see the hypocrisy in that?
User avatar
#163 - peutros (10/15/2016) [-]
For more that i hate to advocate the devil here, the guy has a point. Dont get me wrong tough it would be awfull for you guys to have her on office but democracy is the right for everyone to express their choice, even if such a decision were to cause major problems.

And dont come up with things like "the election is rigged" or "the media spread false info", if thats the case then you should be attacking the media and protesting your own governament, and not targetting peoples right to vote.
#116 - ninjaflapjack (10/15/2016) [-]
I'd disagree. Perverting the course and representative integrity of our necessary free and fair elections will lead to worse disaster. People going beyond the law for the sake of their ethics is how we got social justice.

Albeit the hillary campaign is literally built on that concept but still it's a shitty thing to do.
#212 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**If your that dumb, that you believe this, you shouldn't vote.
User avatar
#181 - zuflux (10/15/2016) [-]
I would argue that sometimes you have to dance with the devil to beat a greater evil.
User avatar
#166 - MuahahaOfLore (10/15/2016) [-]
the election has already been subverted by the biased coverage of the media
#183 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
Then go attack the media rather than your fellow voters
#164 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
If people are stupid enough that their vote counts if they hashtag on Facebook or Twitter then they don't fucking deserve a vote in the first place. #SurvivaloftheFittest
#185 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
Even if people are stupid they still have the right to vote!
USA land of the free? Bah, biggest lie ever. You're constantly complaining about the government restricting your freedom, but you have nothing against doing the same to your fellow citizens.
It's called hypocrisy
#57 - installation (10/14/2016) [-]
I agree with you. This is an extremely important election. If we can stop Trump, America has a future. (One that doesn't end with WW3)
#97 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
hillary says we need to confront russia

trump says we need to become allies with russia
User avatar
#199 - Ruspanic (10/15/2016) [-]
Only the first one is actually realistic. If we don't stand strong against Russia, Putin will just walk all over us and do what he wants. This has been the mainstream Republican position for years, and was even echoed by Mike Pence. Hillary must have learned that when her "Reset" with Russia failed, and Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought we wouldn't do anything to stop him.

How can we ally with Russia, when Russia is a security threat to our allies in NATO, frequently aligns against our interests on the UN Security Council and elsewhere, is allied with Iran (another security threat to the US) and Bashar al-Assad, and spreads anti-Western and anti-US propaganda in its state-run media?
#68 - databutt (10/15/2016) [-]
They must be paying you ALLOT to Correct The Record.
User avatar
#65 - meganinja (10/15/2016) [-]
>Implying Hillary wouldn't start WW3
#124 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
C'mon, Trump is an international incident waiting to happen. He's too impulsive and loves the attention. Hillary we can at least trust to (at the very least) maintain international relationships.
User avatar
#125 - meganinja (10/15/2016) [-]
Can we trust her to do that? Considering she's trying to start a war with Russia before she even gets elected?
User avatar
#180 - Ruspanic (10/15/2016) [-]
no she isn't, her position is the mainstream Republican position. Be tough on Russia. Even Mike Pence supports that, the only reason Trump doesn't is because he doesn't understand foreign policy.
User avatar
#209 - meganinja (10/15/2016) [-]
Since when is trying to get along with Russia not understanding foreign policy?
User avatar
#210 - Ruspanic (10/15/2016) [-]
I didn't say Trump doesn't understand foreign policy because of his position on Russia. He just doesn't understand foreign policy, and as a consequence holds this naive and ill-conceived position. Wanting to get along with Russia is all well and good, but with Trump's particular proposals and behavior - threatening to not defend our NATO allies, ignoring all of Russia's wrongdoings (cyberattacks on the US, invasion of Ukraine, human rights abuses, anti-Western propaganda, etc), praising Putin - Putin would just walk all over him, as he does with any weak leader who won't stand up to him.

Trump seems to think that the US-Russia relationship would be peachy if only our leaders weren't so mean to Putin, but being nice to Putin has been tried and tested - by Obama and Hillary Clinton, no less. It was called the Reset and it failed.

Trump thinks Putin is just waiting for us to ask him to fight ISIS together, apparently not realizing that Putin has already gone into Syria and had his chance to fight ISIS, and failed to do so, instead targeting less radical anti-Assad forces in order to support his ally Assad. Russia is allied with Iran and with the Assad regime, which puts it on the opposite side from us in the primary power struggle in the Middle East, between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
#200 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]

Never forget.
User avatar
#203 - Ruspanic (10/15/2016) [-]
#127 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
If she's really going to try that, I would hope that we can trust congress to veto that. I'm nervous about the things Trump will say to world leaders that we don't have good relationships with. That's just my gut feeling though.
#133 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
>implying wars are always one sided.

If she pisses of Putin enough, HE will go to war. Doesn't need congress' approval for that.
#195 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
Same with Trump. And he'd probably piss Putin off just by being himself, unlike Clinton who knows how to play the political game at least
User avatar
#128 - meganinja (10/15/2016) [-]
The countries we don't have a good relationship with are either Russia or too insignificant to care.

Plus by that logic, Congress could veto Trump also.
#132 - anon (10/15/2016) [-]
Our relationship with China isn't so hot either, and they're certainly not insignificant, and our relationship with Iran is worrisome. I doubt Mexico will be thrilled with Trump elected. And maybe they're not much of an influence on the US, but I'd rather see a president that's able to maintain as many relationships as they can.

Yeah, congress could veto Trump as well by that logic, but what I meant was that they can't veto whatever happens to pop into his head and out his mouth. If Hillary wants to declare war, congress can stop that. But if Trump wants to meet with any world leader, congress can't stop him from saying whatever he feels like. Hillary, former secretary of state and a lifelong politician, I don't believe will have that issue.
User avatar
#190 - freedomfiend (10/15/2016) [-]
I'd rather have a president who can see which relationships are causing us to lose out, and then end those relationships to cut our losses.