Upload
Login or register

boothead

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/24/2012
Last Login:7/24/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4247
Highest Content Rank:#4906
Highest Comment Rank:#555
Content Thumbs: 333 total,  704 ,  371
Comment Thumbs: 9395 total,  14683 ,  5288
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 28 Content: Peasant → Level 29 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 67% (67/100)
Level 273 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 274 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:0
Content Views:68269
Times Content Favorited:8 times
Total Comments Made:4476
FJ Points:7707

latest user's comments

#6 - So uh... you willing to back that up with real life consequenc…  [+] (7 new replies) 05/27/2016 on Anon Reflects On His Life... -18
#39 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
That's one of the ways
They're ineffectual and largely irrelevant, doing little more than circlejerk online.

I wish both sides were just as ineffectual.
#12 - gilgameshxplains (05/28/2016) [-]
You seem to have taken that a bit personally.
#75 - boothead (05/28/2016) [-]
Im not wrong, one side catches peds, murderers and animal abusers while shitposting and saying racist things.
The other side does racist things, advocates murder, shits all over anybody based on a skin color or genital set they don't like, harbor female peds claiming males are all pigs and the little boys would like it regardless, shut down mens shelters etc. the list is endless for tumblrs wrongdoings.
So even if I was butthurt im still right and ergo you're a racist faggot.
#79 - gilgameshxplains (05/28/2016) [-]
Well in my opinion I think both are equally bad in different ways. But I was referring to how you reacted to a post by Bucky McBadBait.
#83 - boothead (05/28/2016) [-]
Anime belongs in the trash.
#23 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
He's not wrong
User avatar
#17 - totallytito (05/28/2016) [-]
It's like a game of minesweeper
#6 - Slavic 05/27/2016 on God Damn +2
#3 - Dude, any and all gun controls is based on lies. What worl…  [+] (21 new replies) 05/25/2016 on EU gun ban is based on lies +21
User avatar
#5 - fishandkids (05/25/2016) [-]
Gun restriction is not a ban.
User avatar
#10 - ironstorm (05/26/2016) [-]
It will rarely ever stop at restrictions.

It's a slippery slope.

That's why we must never give so much as an inch when they ask for a mile.
User avatar
#12 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
What? Fine give, people with down syndrom guns, give them to people who don't know how to use guns. what's the worst that can happen.
User avatar
#29 - meowmeowman (05/26/2016) [-]
I would gladly give someone with down syndrome the ability to DEFEND THEMSELVES.

Fuck the mental disabilities, I believe EVERYONE, no exceptions, should have he right to own guns. Period. Even Violent felons, pedophiles, drug dealers, potatoes, and faggoty Funny Junk users.

Bring on the red thumbs.
#8 - flyinarrow (05/26/2016) [-]
While that is true, it still leaves the common man with a water pistol while big brother gets to ride around in his metaphorical tank
User avatar
#11 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
I'm perfectly fine with people having any gun as long as they can prove they know how to use, store, clean them, have good trigger discipline, can actually aim and go through mandatory psycological evaluation. Too many times do I hear about kids dying because of 4th of july celebratory fire in the air, kids and pets shooting their parents and owners and so on.
User avatar
#15 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
Blame the media then. These things are a statistical anomaly that gets reported to death because it gives them ratings.
User avatar
#16 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
The fact that it happens all the time is unacceptable, it happens way to often in the US, the fact that a lot of them gets to keep guns is even more unacceptable.
User avatar
#17 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
STATISTICAL. ANOMALIES. It means that they're in fact so rare, the fact that they happen is worth notice. You don't hear about the millions of other people not hurting or killing themselves or other people with guns because it's not fucking news. Don't deign to try and tell me about what's wrong with a culture you know next to nothing about besides memes your exposed to on the internet
User avatar
#18 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
You do know those other people would not lose their fucking guns at all, right? it would ONLY take guns away from people who don't know how to use them.
User avatar
#20 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
Also,
>it only takes them away from someone who doesn't know how to use them
Why don't you support doing this with automobiles then? Cars kill orders of magnitude more people than guns do
User avatar
#22 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
We do that you idiot. However far more people have cars use their cars and when people actually fuck up with cars, they do lose their liscence.
User avatar
#25 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
If more people are using their cars right, why are there so much more deaths from auto accidents than guns? Answer me that please. Does it really matter to the people who died if the driver loses their license after he plows into their car drunk? Your idea of punishing people for their crimes can be applied without a licensing scheme.
User avatar
#26 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
Because far more people have and use their cars. More people dies from stabbing then nuclear weapons, let everyone have nukes. Yes it help because it stops them from doing it the future.
User avatar
#30 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
Also, misrepresenting my argument doesn't make your argument more valid. It makes it look like you have no point to make
User avatar
#28 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
Punishing people for crimes stops them from doing it again? You mean like people who do stuff without licenses too?
User avatar
#27 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
In the US there are a comparable number of firearms and vehicles, why are the stats not higher for guns than cars, then?
User avatar
#24 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
Why are you being rude? Like if you don't agree with me, that's fine. I don't care, you're so insignificant that it doesn't really bug me. But if you're going to be a belligerant retard (like most people who support gun control) there's no use even arguing. You'll just ignore everything I say and point to the vocal minority and statistcal anomalies and feelings to support your argument instead of cold hard facts.
User avatar
#19 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
And you do realize that someone has to be in charge of who gets guns right? Where's the line? Mental health issues is what your main issue seems to be, so I'll counter with the fact that you cannot legally own a gun anywhere in the US if you've been committed to a mental health insitution. If you actually think more mental health barriers are needed, where do they set the line then? A blanket list of mental illnesses that keeps people from owning guns? Yeah, that's not easily abused at all. Get prescribed ritalin as a kid? No guns for you. There's nothing to even stop them from listing the fact that someone wants to buy a gun as a mental condition. Absolutely zero of any proposed legislative actions in the US regarding gun control would have stopped any of the mass shootings that the media blows out of proportion. There's very little you can do to actually stop lots of the violent crime in America because we have a culture problem among our minorities. Gang violence artificially inflates all violent crime rates in the US and makes up a disproportionate amount of gun violence statistics. If you take away gang violence from statistics like the rate of firearm-related homicides, it drops considerably to the point where it starts to resemble Canada. There are countries with much more restrictive gun control than the US (See: Brazil) and their homicide rates are through the roof. There are precious little aspects of politics where there is a definite wrong and right side. This is one of them. There are many, MANY examples of how gun control doesn't work. You're barking up the wrong tree, because you're just accepting whatever news network you subscribe to's political views because it's easier to accept them and make edgy comments about the US instead of actually being somewhat constructive
User avatar
#21 - fishandkids (05/26/2016) [-]
Ignore everything I said about my main point about people who clearly don't know how to handle guns and so on. People who have no idea how to use guns keep getting them. People who let their kids play with guns because they're idiots who don't know how to use guns because they don't how to procve they know how to use it. How about treating it like a car and how you have to pass that instead of handing it out like candy.
User avatar
#23 - Onemanretardpack (05/26/2016) [-]
How many idiots do you see day-to-day driving a car? How can you not see any parallels between car licensing and what you're proposing?
#96 - Because we have massive cities full of nothing but gun control… 05/25/2016 on Rights +2
#23 - Socialism is Socialism. Call it Marxism, Fascism or Communism …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/25/2016 on Bernie mark 0
User avatar
#29 - scootabot (05/25/2016) [-]
Bernie supports movements that believe heavily in Marxist ideals. As does Hillary.

We generally call these people the "Regressive Left". Just as those on the opposite end of the spectrum are referred to as the "Alt Right".

From what I've seen, Bernie Sanders supports the movement that literally uses the phrase, "We have nothing to lose but our chains." one of the final lines in the communist manifesto co-written by Karl Marx.

When a candidate has followers who genuinely believe in the communist manifesto, I can't help but think that his ideals must be Marxist.

Just as a candidate who has followers that are overwhelmingly racist and sexist shouldn't be in office because of the sorts of people they inspire. Again, I'm still referring to Bernie and his lot. Hillary too. Trump is the lesser of three evils. I'm not voting, but I support Trump.
#87 - Because the 1.2 million people on average a year who use a gun…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/25/2016 on Rights +3
User avatar
#95 - WutsAtroll (05/25/2016) [-]
what? If that's true and it's really saving lives, why does the US have a significantly higher murder rate than other Western countries?
#135 - ddoggdiggity (05/25/2016) [-]
Higher murder rate but not a higher violent crime rate
User avatar
#116 - meganinja (05/25/2016) [-]
The U.S. is an extremely polarized country. In inner cities we have areas of immense poverty, where people survive off criminal activities. Gang on gang violence is responsible for the majority of gun crime in the United States.
User avatar
#97 - middleeastexplain (05/25/2016) [-]
Population sizes are vastly different.
#96 - boothead (05/25/2016) [-]
Because we have massive cities full of nothing but gun control and poverty. Poverty causes crime, gun control is a catalyst. Outside of our top 5 violent cities Which is also are our top 5 gun control cities, haha who knew? per capita the US is like place number 7 on the list of safest places to live on Earth.
The reason people get turned around is because of the way facts are presented. If I told you guns cause 30,000 deaths a year youd be like "lol silly mericans" but when I told you 20,000 are suicides and kills in self defense/by cops count to make the other 10,000 you'd think more critically.
Gun control has nothing to do with guns, its about control. If a 5"4 woman is getting attacked by a 6"3 man shes toast, if she has a .45 and decent training its an even fight. Even if hes armed with a gun as well, then its a level playing field where both parties have only their own skill to rely on. Not to mention cripples, the elderly and the sick.
#144 - With no right to self defense... Yea where have you been? …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/21/2016 on Think Of The Childern 0
User avatar
#145 - acemrhawk (05/21/2016) [-]
Wh...what? Can anyone actually make some sense out of this?
#200 - Jokes on anybody who thinks any Democrat would have a ******* … 05/21/2016 on Hilary gets Berned +1
#137 - Americans are more afraid of losing an inalienable right like …  [+] (3 new replies) 05/21/2016 on Think Of The Childern +2
User avatar
#143 - acemrhawk (05/21/2016) [-]
European countries have lost inalienable rights? Also, if control is the problem, why are Americans not as rustled about the ridiculous drug laws which are denying a lot of freedom?
#144 - boothead (05/21/2016) [-]
With no right to self defense... Yea where have you been?
Americans are man, where have you been?
User avatar
#145 - acemrhawk (05/21/2016) [-]
Wh...what? Can anyone actually make some sense out of this?
#13 - >Be British >Get brutally ******* stabbed to death 05/15/2016 on /int/ +1