x
Click to expand

boothead

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/24/2012
Last Login:5/30/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13514
Highest Content Rank:#4906
Highest Comment Rank:#555
Content Thumbs: 328 total,  698 ,  370
Comment Thumbs: 6297 total,  10479 ,  4182
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 28 Content: Peasant → Level 29 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 1% (1/100)
Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 251 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:66542
Times Content Favorited:8 times
Total Comments Made:3685
FJ Points:5336

latest user's comments

#150 - Works better than democrat spending polices but to fix the eco… 11/13/2014 on Twitter's reasonable... 0
#16 - No clue what I just read.  [+] (2 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Bacon +26
#28 - OldSnake (11/13/2014) [-]
#20 - hostofswarms (11/13/2014) [-]
#148 - I just double checked, the actual unemployment rate is 12.4%. …  [+] (3 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Twitter's reasonable... 0
#149 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
you are right that Forbes says that but they include people with part time jobs. Also do you think a Republican supply side/ trickle down type economic policy might have worked better? just wondering
#151 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
well how i see it a supply side economic policy has not and would not work because it assumes companies will expand production (ie. create more jobs) before there is a higher demand for the products. but thats with my limited knowledge of economics. if you could tell me how im wrong i willing to listen.
#150 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Works better than democrat spending polices but to fix the economy we need Congress to control the printing of money instead of a private bank.
#146 - Unemployments at 14%, up from two years ago.  [+] (5 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Twitter's reasonable... 0
#148 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
I just double checked, the actual unemployment rate is 12.4%.
The United States Government doesn't count those who havent looked for a job in 6 months as unemployed to make the number look better.
#149 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
you are right that Forbes says that but they include people with part time jobs. Also do you think a Republican supply side/ trickle down type economic policy might have worked better? just wondering
#151 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
well how i see it a supply side economic policy has not and would not work because it assumes companies will expand production (ie. create more jobs) before there is a higher demand for the products. but thats with my limited knowledge of economics. if you could tell me how im wrong i willing to listen.
#150 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Works better than democrat spending polices but to fix the economy we need Congress to control the printing of money instead of a private bank.
#32 - Have this website has the potential for life, yet if I kill on… 11/13/2014 on what mom thinks: "Double kill" -1
#1 - Even the update is outdated. 11/13/2014 on My life since midnight 0
#27 - Mistakes are made, people fit for society shouldn't be forced …  [+] (4 new replies) 11/13/2014 on what mom thinks: "Double kill" -1
#31 - tomowrath (11/13/2014) [-]
Here we go
User avatar #28 - letting (11/13/2014) [-]
It isn't ending a life, it's destroying the potential for life, yes, but a fetus cannot survive on its own, therefore it is not sustaining life.

It's the difference between stepping on an acorn and cutting-down a 100-year old oak tree. People will care about one, but not the other. Can you guess which?
#32 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Have this website has the potential for life, yet if I kill one of you all of you will cry like a little bitch.
#30 - Absolute Madman (11/13/2014) [-]
High school biology not even once.
Just because you have the potential for life doesn't mean you aren't alive right now you cheeky cunt. Whether you consider it worthy of human rights doesn't change the fact that it is a living entity.
#84 - Comment deleted 11/12/2014 on A message for the Users 0
#23 - I am pro eugenics but why is your murder more accepted? Yo…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/12/2014 on what mom thinks: "Double kill" -2
User avatar #26 - Noonelikesanimal (11/13/2014) [-]
because its not a person, it has potential to be a person. the mother may not be able to financially support a baby, or be able to afford the medical bills that come with caring a developing fetus growing inside their body. not to mention the toll it takes on a body.
#27 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Mistakes are made, people fit for society shouldn't be forced to wait ten years to adopt somebody else fit for society. You shouldn't end a life simply because 'lol I dont feel like dealing with the consequences' like 95% of most abortions in the United States.
#31 - tomowrath (11/13/2014) [-]
Here we go
User avatar #28 - letting (11/13/2014) [-]
It isn't ending a life, it's destroying the potential for life, yes, but a fetus cannot survive on its own, therefore it is not sustaining life.

It's the difference between stepping on an acorn and cutting-down a 100-year old oak tree. People will care about one, but not the other. Can you guess which?
#32 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Have this website has the potential for life, yet if I kill one of you all of you will cry like a little bitch.
#30 - Absolute Madman (11/13/2014) [-]
High school biology not even once.
Just because you have the potential for life doesn't mean you aren't alive right now you cheeky cunt. Whether you consider it worthy of human rights doesn't change the fact that it is a living entity.
#170 - She had a point till she said exercise cuts out pizza and chin… 11/12/2014 on 'Murica is spreading like mayo 0
#137 - Giving an example of to much power on one side of the Spectrum…  [+] (7 new replies) 11/12/2014 on Twitter's reasonable... 0
#145 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
by most standards the economy has gotten better, so i don't really understand your point. Also spending money stimulates the economy (ie. the new deal/ WWII)
#146 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Unemployments at 14%, up from two years ago.
#148 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
I just double checked, the actual unemployment rate is 12.4%.
The United States Government doesn't count those who havent looked for a job in 6 months as unemployed to make the number look better.
#149 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
you are right that Forbes says that but they include people with part time jobs. Also do you think a Republican supply side/ trickle down type economic policy might have worked better? just wondering
#151 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
well how i see it a supply side economic policy has not and would not work because it assumes companies will expand production (ie. create more jobs) before there is a higher demand for the products. but thats with my limited knowledge of economics. if you could tell me how im wrong i willing to listen.
#150 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Works better than democrat spending polices but to fix the economy we need Congress to control the printing of money instead of a private bank.
#30 - Comment deleted 11/12/2014 on Only anti gg women get... 0
#78 - People want the choice to not have a baby and go to great leng…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/12/2014 on Cannibal Blowjob Holocaust... +5
#82 - dubmaster (11/12/2014) [-]
I'm waiting for someone to come in and say:

"NO MAN WILL TELL ME WHAT TO DO WITH MY BODY"
#75 - Like how Democrats ran Congress and held the presidential seat…  [+] (10 new replies) 11/12/2014 on Twitter's reasonable... +1
#125 - thebigbadbeest (11/12/2014) [-]
what are you even saying? that does not even make sense.
#137 - boothead (11/12/2014) [-]
Giving an example of to much power on one side of the Spectrum, Democrats believe the more money they spend the better the economy, but look whats been happening.
#145 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
by most standards the economy has gotten better, so i don't really understand your point. Also spending money stimulates the economy (ie. the new deal/ WWII)
#146 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Unemployments at 14%, up from two years ago.
#148 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
I just double checked, the actual unemployment rate is 12.4%.
The United States Government doesn't count those who havent looked for a job in 6 months as unemployed to make the number look better.
#149 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
you are right that Forbes says that but they include people with part time jobs. Also do you think a Republican supply side/ trickle down type economic policy might have worked better? just wondering
#151 - thebigbadbeest (11/13/2014) [-]
well how i see it a supply side economic policy has not and would not work because it assumes companies will expand production (ie. create more jobs) before there is a higher demand for the products. but thats with my limited knowledge of economics. if you could tell me how im wrong i willing to listen.
#150 - boothead (11/13/2014) [-]
Works better than democrat spending polices but to fix the economy we need Congress to control the printing of money instead of a private bank.
User avatar #77 - Tyranitar (11/12/2014) [-]
Well, I could already tell you a 2-party political system doesn't and won't ever work.

But yeah, with all this power feminists are receiving, misandrist oppression can begin to occur, and there won't be any countermeasures.
#5 - Anything on console is 20x better one pc anyway :/ 11/12/2014 on Please help me -1
#2 - She deserves every ******* sentence. 11/11/2014 on muh sojjengy 0
#2 - **boothead rolled image ** Yup. 11/11/2014 on Let's play +1
#46 - **boothead rolls 409,934,784** what are the odds its mostly … 11/11/2014 on $25 Visa Gift Card Give-Away 0
#104 - Picking up the trash bag is a step to taking the trash out, bu…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/11/2014 on Worth the read. -2
User avatar #105 - hydraetis (11/11/2014) [-]
So I'm totally fine for giving drugs to someone knowing full well those drugs are going straight to someone being victimised?

And Drug lords must also not make victims as they aren't the ones directly dealing the drugs to addicts either.
#2 - Or you could kill yourself on camera. Id totally pay 20 bucks … 11/11/2014 on India vacation... 0
#101 - I can see where you're coming from, but dude, transporting dru…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/11/2014 on Worth the read. 0
User avatar #112 - ponchosdm (11/11/2014) [-]
I know, they are totally different things for decent people, but for criminals or people that think that what they do is not bad at all those things are no problem
dammit didn't saw what you did there, I am not good with internal jokes, or american jokes.

point is, as long as you do not think what you are doing is bad, then you wont see a problem there, you can see human traffic is a problem, drug traffic has more problems before transporting it than after delivering it to the client, thus, people think that having drug has no problem at all, if there is no transport there is no client, if there is no client, there is no need to make the product. it is a big circle, sadly both human and drug draffic have and will always have clients, so it will never end thank you for exposing your thoughts on the matter
#99 - You're a dumbass. Trafficking is victimless, dealing is not vi…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/11/2014 on Worth the read. -1
User avatar #102 - hydraetis (11/11/2014) [-]
Trafficking is part of the fucking dealing.
#104 - boothead (11/11/2014) [-]
Picking up the trash bag is a step to taking the trash out, but putting the trash in the garbage can is the act of taking the trash out.
User avatar #105 - hydraetis (11/11/2014) [-]
So I'm totally fine for giving drugs to someone knowing full well those drugs are going straight to someone being victimised?

And Drug lords must also not make victims as they aren't the ones directly dealing the drugs to addicts either.
#96 - Wow man, suicidal people didn't sit down and choose and to be …  [+] (2 new replies) 11/11/2014 on Worth the read. -2
User avatar #116 - azumeow (11/11/2014) [-]
The alcoholic ABSOLUTELY had a say. They had a say every day of their life, every drink they had.

So did the suicidal person. You kill yourself, it's on you and nobody else. It's your decision. People can influence it, but if you can't take the heat, nobody else is to blame, at the end of the day, but you. And don't try and get all high and mighty on me. I've been there. I've fucking been there with the knife against me, ready to make that cut. I didn't fucking do it, because no matter what, you always have a choice. The only fucking difference is how tough making that god damned choice is.
User avatar #397 - dtox (11/11/2014) [-]
Not trying to act "high and mighty" here, but thats really unfair to downplay peoples suicidal actions as being unable to "take the heat."

you've been in that position, same as i, and we both managed to stray from that terrible choice, which im very happy that we did. but thats only because we were in the correct mindset to.

some people dont get that choice, simply because their brains, dictated by the balance of various chemicals, wouldnt allow them to. thats all it takes, a little more of this chemical, a little less of that, and you have a brain that can only truely percieve a liimited number of options to end its own sufferring.

In my case, i luckily had a mother who not only noticed something was wrong, but did everything in her power to make sure i got the right kind of help i desperately needed. It is this fact that i consider myself to be very fortunate, unlike so many other people who go on unnoticed.
#21 - The first amendmant means we can't be arrested for saying thin…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/11/2014 on Orwell style +3
#57 - Absolute Madman (11/11/2014) [-]
There are three breaks to the first amendment. One of them is words designed to cause harm to one's personal or reputation by intention, or those designed to cause panic. the others are those inciting violence, or informing people how to commit crimes.

However, the way at which a private site is run, so long as being there is optional,
User avatar #34 - thunderkrux (11/11/2014) [-]
Well there are limits to what we can say. We can't be arrested for having an opinion. We can be arrested or at least sue for slander or libel. We can be arrested for yelling shark at a beach or fire in a movie theatre.

Anon is arguing that they can suffer reprocussions for not allowing it, but actually it's no different than being kicked out of store for causing a ruckus by saying hitler was right we really should kill all the jews. I can kick you off my own property for any reason what so ever.
#92 - Further actually, because in human trafficking the humans are …  [+] (3 new replies) 11/11/2014 on Worth the read. +1
User avatar #98 - ponchosdm (11/11/2014) [-]
yes, for humans with conscience we think that is bad, for humans without conscience, they think other humans are just product, so for them moving humans, is the same that for you moving drugs. they are not doing anything bad, they are just transporting a product, so there should not be anything bad in just transporting, I mean animal traffic would be relevant, not many people consider animal feelings, well not as important as human feelings obviously
#101 - boothead (11/11/2014) [-]
I can see where you're coming from, but dude, transporting drugs and people are in two different categories, it's like comparing Giraffes and crystal meth.
See what I did there?
User avatar #112 - ponchosdm (11/11/2014) [-]
I know, they are totally different things for decent people, but for criminals or people that think that what they do is not bad at all those things are no problem
dammit didn't saw what you did there, I am not good with internal jokes, or american jokes.

point is, as long as you do not think what you are doing is bad, then you wont see a problem there, you can see human traffic is a problem, drug traffic has more problems before transporting it than after delivering it to the client, thus, people think that having drug has no problem at all, if there is no transport there is no client, if there is no client, there is no need to make the product. it is a big circle, sadly both human and drug draffic have and will always have clients, so it will never end thank you for exposing your thoughts on the matter

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2500
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #20 - vladthewolfdemon (12/30/2014) [-]
No, but seriously. Why do you say Martial arts wouldn't work in those two situations?
#21 to #20 - boothead (12/31/2014) [-]
The elderly, people who are under 6foot, sick people, anybody who doesn't have a sense of balance etc.

The reason Australia doesnt have guns is because their government is afraid to lose its money and power, the only threat its government had was an armed populace, so who enforces its government now? Its own government? What can they do when they gifure out their votes are rigged? Cry?
User avatar #23 to #21 - vladthewolfdemon (02/10/2015) [-]
I recalled my friends situation where he doesn't like it - paranoid people I get jump if people wearing a "Tapout" shirt have been following me more than a block
User avatar #22 to #21 - vladthewolfdemon (12/31/2014) [-]
Okay you raise fair points about sick people and whatnot, but you can gain a sense of balence - That's basically what capoeira is all about, shifting you center of gravity.
And while most "Old people" might not be strong an old man by the name of Morihei Ueshiba created Aikido once he realised he couldn't punch people with the force he used to use, so then he made something where you use your opponents momentum/force against them - so old people could use that (Unless they're 90 in which case, shouldn't they be in a home or something?)
While on the younger side, people my age (early 20's) since we have more energy than older people surely we could generate what older people can't, so the arts should serve them fine.

Now onto firearms - I have a handful of friends that enjoy hunting and have guns and whatnot - the one friend's opinion I'll focus on did Legal Studies with me.
Okay so the "triggering event" for guns to be near-on removed was the Port Arthur massacre and we both agreed 'That kind of thing sucks, but it "makes sense" that they did it.' However we did research and essays on the 're-legalisation' of semi-auto and full-auto's and we did agree that bringing in semi-auto's was fine - He said just make them a different class of firearms along with full auto's while I said 'make them the hardest to get' but all other types of firearms have seemingly been getting easier to get (You still need reasons for them like 'Pest control' or 'Target shooting' not just "but I want it!" which is better because psycho cunts have to be determined)

In terms of conceal carry - it doesn't sit with me my friend thinks it's okay in certain situations I don't remember them for the life of me but even he thinks sometimes it isn't the greatest way to prevent crimes.

In all seriousness I LIKE debates like this - because it's an insight into a perspective that I don't come across often.
So if you wanna talk guns with me I'm all for it
User avatar #13 - soundofwinter (06/23/2014) [-]
**** you
#14 to #13 - boothead (06/23/2014) [-]
Why?
User avatar #15 to #14 - soundofwinter (06/23/2014) [-]
OP delivered
#16 to #15 - boothead (06/23/2014) [-]
I'm lost, I'm not sure if it's a good for you moment or do you hate me and should I offer you a massage?
User avatar #17 to #16 - soundofwinter (06/23/2014) [-]
you thumbed my content

"if you thumb this I will write **** you on your profile
#18 to #17 - boothead (06/23/2014) [-]
Damn, you're calling on things I didn't even remember doing.
#6 - whydoniggers (08/29/2013) [-]
yo friend, he is alive
#7 to #6 - boothead (08/29/2013) [-]
Prove it.
#11 to #7 - whydoniggers (08/29/2013) [-]
told you
told you
User avatar #9 to #7 - arabiddrummer **User deleted account** (08/29/2013) [-]
Sup
#10 to #8 - boothead (08/29/2013) [-]
Somebodies getting a paddling.
User avatar #3 - sonym (04/03/2013) [-]
I'm getting real tired of your **** .
#1 - mzasmoke has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - boothead (02/09/2013) [-]
Oh looky here fellows it's that one guy with multiple accounts, and no green thumbs, this neck beard swaggot rolled in from facebook like a stray cat... You are like what? 12? Talking about my mother... Go play Call of Duty assclown
 Friends (0)