x
FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand

boothead

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/24/2012
Last Login:3/02/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#12045
Comment Ranking:#4307
Highest Content Rank:#4906
Highest Comment Rank:#555
Content Thumbs: 328 total,  698 ,  370
Comment Thumbs: 6250 total,  10373 ,  4123
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 28 Content: Peasant → Level 29 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:66372
Times Content Favorited:8 times
Total Comments Made:3633
FJ Points:5301

Funny Text/Links

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 1417
    Thumbs Up 24 Thumbs Down 11 Total: +13
    Comments: 17
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/03/12
    This Morning This Morning
  • Views: 2207
    Thumbs Up 10 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +6
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/08/14
    Super Mario Moonshine Super Mario Moonshine

YouTube Videos

  • Views: 1367
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 10 Total: +5
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/16/12
    Clever title Clever title

latest user's comments

#3 - hahhahaaha 02/28/2015 on Making Avatars 0
#135 - So instead of actively *********** you, me and yo…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/28/2015 on They Did a Thing 0
User avatar #136 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
YES! That has been my point from the begining! Maybe this will be a good rule, maybe...

But calling a 300 page rule that no one is allowed to see that was passed by several people who were not voted into there office the pinnacle of democracy? that makes me vomit a little.

As I have said in other posts, if they would release the wording now but especially if they had done it before they voted on it so people could express there opinion I would be less hard on it, I may not have commented at all.
User avatar #137 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Hence my original comment was more or less shit posting OP. If you noticed I did not mention FCC or net neutrality in the first post, that is because I would have replied this way to any rule set down this secretive way and then held up as a beacon of democracy.
#40 - I watch it every now and then and I am fairly certain my fianc… 02/28/2015 on Geez, thanks Obama +1
#3 - Thats what I mean though... Such an important tool and compani… 02/28/2015 on Net Neutrality Wins... for now 0
#133 - Oh wait your pissed because you think America is actually a De…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/28/2015 on They Did a Thing 0
#134 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Don't be to hard on yourself, you should not call yourself a moron. It is not your fault that you didn't read the article you posted. I would have read it first personally but for the moment it is a free country, I forgive you. Have a great weekend!
#135 - boothead (02/28/2015) [-]
So instead of actively shitposting you, me and you need to combine our efforts and shitpost OP?
User avatar #136 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
YES! That has been my point from the begining! Maybe this will be a good rule, maybe...

But calling a 300 page rule that no one is allowed to see that was passed by several people who were not voted into there office the pinnacle of democracy? that makes me vomit a little.

As I have said in other posts, if they would release the wording now but especially if they had done it before they voted on it so people could express there opinion I would be less hard on it, I may not have commented at all.
User avatar #137 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Hence my original comment was more or less shit posting OP. If you noticed I did not mention FCC or net neutrality in the first post, that is because I would have replied this way to any rule set down this secretive way and then held up as a beacon of democracy.
#92 - I don't think you understand at all what Net Neutrality means,…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/27/2015 on They Did a Thing 0
User avatar #95 - shieldanvil (02/27/2015) [-]
I don't think you really understand what democracy means, which is all originally commented on. you failed to answer any of the questions above. I find it humorous that you believe that this 300 page document only has exactly what you think is in it without anyone ever seeing it. You think one government ISP would be good? I support Google fiber personally. I am still not sure who you are arguing with as I have yet to say that net neutrality is bad or good...
#133 - boothead (02/28/2015) [-]
Oh wait your pissed because you think America is actually a Democracy? You empty headed moron The United States is and always has been a Democratic Republic with people we elect making decisions on our behave omfg guys check this retard out.
#134 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Don't be to hard on yourself, you should not call yourself a moron. It is not your fault that you didn't read the article you posted. I would have read it first personally but for the moment it is a free country, I forgive you. Have a great weekend!
#135 - boothead (02/28/2015) [-]
So instead of actively shitposting you, me and you need to combine our efforts and shitpost OP?
User avatar #136 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
YES! That has been my point from the begining! Maybe this will be a good rule, maybe...

But calling a 300 page rule that no one is allowed to see that was passed by several people who were not voted into there office the pinnacle of democracy? that makes me vomit a little.

As I have said in other posts, if they would release the wording now but especially if they had done it before they voted on it so people could express there opinion I would be less hard on it, I may not have commented at all.
User avatar #137 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Hence my original comment was more or less shit posting OP. If you noticed I did not mention FCC or net neutrality in the first post, that is because I would have replied this way to any rule set down this secretive way and then held up as a beacon of democracy.
#82 - I can see how net neutrality will totally **** us…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/27/2015 on They Did a Thing -7
User avatar #83 - shieldanvil (02/27/2015) [-]
Not sure I said that? Where did I say that? Who are you replying too? Do you support the governments making rules that they will not let there citizens see? Do you know what the rule you are talking about even says? of wait no one does, never mind that last question.
#92 - boothead (02/27/2015) [-]
I don't think you understand at all what Net Neutrality means, not to mention those rules are for ISPs not us, not to mention that if this was a true penis potato boat as you say wed only have one government run ISP.
User avatar #95 - shieldanvil (02/27/2015) [-]
I don't think you really understand what democracy means, which is all originally commented on. you failed to answer any of the questions above. I find it humorous that you believe that this 300 page document only has exactly what you think is in it without anyone ever seeing it. You think one government ISP would be good? I support Google fiber personally. I am still not sure who you are arguing with as I have yet to say that net neutrality is bad or good...
#133 - boothead (02/28/2015) [-]
Oh wait your pissed because you think America is actually a Democracy? You empty headed moron The United States is and always has been a Democratic Republic with people we elect making decisions on our behave omfg guys check this retard out.
#134 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Don't be to hard on yourself, you should not call yourself a moron. It is not your fault that you didn't read the article you posted. I would have read it first personally but for the moment it is a free country, I forgive you. Have a great weekend!
#135 - boothead (02/28/2015) [-]
So instead of actively shitposting you, me and you need to combine our efforts and shitpost OP?
User avatar #136 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
YES! That has been my point from the begining! Maybe this will be a good rule, maybe...

But calling a 300 page rule that no one is allowed to see that was passed by several people who were not voted into there office the pinnacle of democracy? that makes me vomit a little.

As I have said in other posts, if they would release the wording now but especially if they had done it before they voted on it so people could express there opinion I would be less hard on it, I may not have commented at all.
User avatar #137 - shieldanvil (02/28/2015) [-]
Hence my original comment was more or less shit posting OP. If you noticed I did not mention FCC or net neutrality in the first post, that is because I would have replied this way to any rule set down this secretive way and then held up as a beacon of democracy.
#1 - Now if only ISPs were forced to give consumers fair rates for …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/27/2015 on Net Neutrality Wins... for now 0
#2 - nopefarther (02/27/2015) [-]
Woah woah slow down buddy, you don't wanna give the ISP's a heart attack.
I feel you though my internet is pretty shit but there are no other ISP's in my area yet so it's either shit net or nothing
#3 - boothead (02/28/2015) [-]
Thats what I mean though... Such an important tool and companies can fucking throttle us for everything if we dont pay more cash. Fuck Ted Turner and his stupid fucking face
#69 - That'd mean he is a US Marine. 02/27/2015 on lol bronies 0
#8 - Comment deleted 02/27/2015 on 'Murica Defense spending 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe videogames

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2500
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #20 - vladthewolfdemon (12/30/2014) [-]
No, but seriously. Why do you say Martial arts wouldn't work in those two situations?
#21 to #20 - boothead (12/31/2014) [-]
The elderly, people who are under 6foot, sick people, anybody who doesn't have a sense of balance etc.

The reason Australia doesnt have guns is because their government is afraid to lose its money and power, the only threat its government had was an armed populace, so who enforces its government now? Its own government? What can they do when they gifure out their votes are rigged? Cry?
User avatar #23 to #21 - vladthewolfdemon (02/10/2015) [-]
I recalled my friends situation where he doesn't like it - paranoid people I get jump if people wearing a "Tapout" shirt have been following me more than a block
User avatar #22 to #21 - vladthewolfdemon (12/31/2014) [-]
Okay you raise fair points about sick people and whatnot, but you can gain a sense of balence - That's basically what capoeira is all about, shifting you center of gravity.
And while most "Old people" might not be strong an old man by the name of Morihei Ueshiba created Aikido once he realised he couldn't punch people with the force he used to use, so then he made something where you use your opponents momentum/force against them - so old people could use that (Unless they're 90 in which case, shouldn't they be in a home or something?)
While on the younger side, people my age (early 20's) since we have more energy than older people surely we could generate what older people can't, so the arts should serve them fine.

Now onto firearms - I have a handful of friends that enjoy hunting and have guns and whatnot - the one friend's opinion I'll focus on did Legal Studies with me.
Okay so the "triggering event" for guns to be near-on removed was the Port Arthur massacre and we both agreed 'That kind of thing sucks, but it "makes sense" that they did it.' However we did research and essays on the 're-legalisation' of semi-auto and full-auto's and we did agree that bringing in semi-auto's was fine - He said just make them a different class of firearms along with full auto's while I said 'make them the hardest to get' but all other types of firearms have seemingly been getting easier to get (You still need reasons for them like 'Pest control' or 'Target shooting' not just "but I want it!" which is better because psycho cunts have to be determined)

In terms of conceal carry - it doesn't sit with me my friend thinks it's okay in certain situations I don't remember them for the life of me but even he thinks sometimes it isn't the greatest way to prevent crimes.

In all seriousness I LIKE debates like this - because it's an insight into a perspective that I don't come across often.
So if you wanna talk guns with me I'm all for it
User avatar #13 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
**** you
#14 to #13 - boothead (06/23/2014) [-]
Why?
User avatar #15 to #14 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
OP delivered
#16 to #15 - boothead (06/23/2014) [-]
I'm lost, I'm not sure if it's a good for you moment or do you hate me and should I offer you a massage?
User avatar #17 to #16 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
you thumbed my content

"if you thumb this I will write **** you on your profile
#18 to #17 - boothead (06/23/2014) [-]
Damn, you're calling on things I didn't even remember doing.
#6 - whydoniggers (08/29/2013) [-]
yo friend, he is alive
#7 to #6 - boothead (08/29/2013) [-]
Prove it.
#11 to #7 - whydoniggers (08/29/2013) [-]
told you
told you
User avatar #9 to #7 - arabiddrummer **User deleted account** (08/29/2013) [-]
Sup
#10 to #8 - boothead (08/29/2013) [-]
Somebodies getting a paddling.
User avatar #3 - sonym (04/03/2013) [-]
I'm getting real tired of your **** .
#1 - mzasmoke has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - boothead (02/09/2013) [-]
Oh looky here fellows it's that one guy with multiple accounts, and no green thumbs, this neck beard swaggot rolled in from facebook like a stray cat... You are like what? 12? Talking about my mother... Go play Call of Duty assclown
 Friends (0)