Upload
Login or register

boeka

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 35
Date Signed Up:12/28/2010
Last Login:12/02/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#6845
Highest Content Rank:#1147
Highest Comment Rank:#1636
Content Thumbs: 8103 total,  8935 ,  832
Comment Thumbs: 5717 total,  7258 ,  1541
Content Level Progress: 72% (72/100)
Level 175 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 176 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 47% (47/100)
Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 256 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:2
Content Views:317792
Times Content Favorited:325 times
Total Comments Made:1683
FJ Points:13199
Favorite Tags: is (4) | actual (2) | fuck (2) | the (2) | this (2) | what (2)

latest user's comments

#9 - I heard the US economy must have war to endure. It'd crash and…  [+] (3 replies) 12/31/2013 on Military Comp +6
User avatar
#47 - adu (12/31/2013) [-]
The term is "military industrial complex".
User avatar
#14 - manicekman (12/31/2013) [-]
"crash". There would either be a shitload of bored soldiers or they would get fired making them unemployed. Also there are factories who create army shit especially for the US so they would need to find new customers or go bankrupt. I Considering how big the US economy is, warstuff is not that important. However it would have impact on foreign economics and of course on politics and shit like that. US want to show the world they are no. 1 in warstuff etc. and a lots of other reasons exist for US to keep sending soldiers around the globe.
#10 - kanedam (12/31/2013) [-]
for all i have heard and know its true.
#34 - I thought I discussed it here already. Or maybe somewhere else…  [+] (14 replies) 12/31/2013 on Fucking Tom +7
User avatar
#71 - bagguhsleep (12/31/2013) [-]
th-thanks
User avatar
#39 - biscuitsunited (12/31/2013) [-]
Or you could look at it from the perspective that tom is just a merry face in a childrens book.
User avatar
#80 - sabcy (12/31/2013) [-]
In the books, Tom Bombadil represents other forces, ones who could protect the ring indefinitely, but choose not to. The same goes for the Elves, who could have taken and hidden the ring permanently, with no fear of saurons grasp, or leaving it with the great spider, who's cave alone the dark one's gaze could not pierce. Thier are many points at which the entire book could have ended much nicer for Frodo and co., but it didn't.
User avatar
#82 - biscuitsunited (12/31/2013) [-]
That's a much more logical explanation than the guy persisting that The lord of the rings, written for Tolkien children, are not children's books.
User avatar
#99 - sabcy (01/01/2014) [-]
... It's not a children's book.
User avatar
#40 - biscuitsunited (12/31/2013) [-]
Just sayin
User avatar
#42 - ancano (12/31/2013) [-]
and that's where the story would have ended if frodo had stayed near the shire. but it isn't a children's book. and tom bombadil is not a shallow character
User avatar
#46 - biscuitsunited (12/31/2013) [-]
I think he is.
#65 - electro (12/31/2013) [-]
Sure I can understand why you would be able to say that, but you know how people make fun of english teachers because they always ask like "what do the blue drapes represent emotionally for this character? What was the author trying to say with this one irrelevant sentence in the book?" and everyone is just like "probably that the drapes are fucking blue."
well Tolkien was one of those authors that actually included characters like tom for a reason. not just to say "heres a merry face" so if anyones right in this conversation, its ancano, not you.
User avatar
#66 - biscuitsunited (12/31/2013) [-]
Well, It's a 70 year old children's book, so who knows?
#68 - electro (12/31/2013) [-]
no you see thats the thing, any research on Tolkien will tell you that he wouldnt put in a character as significant as Tom for no reason. Sure maybe he had bigger plans for him that he never got to, so the meaning of the character may not be exactly what ancano is saying it is, but either way, its pretty much guarenteed that you can scratch "just a merry face" off of the list of reasons for his existence.
User avatar
#70 - biscuitsunited (12/31/2013) [-]
I'm sure you know your stuff, but i'm not going to change my mind on the characters I grew up with. I've been reading this tale since i was a wee lad, And i'm not changing my view on one of them because there may or may not bee some deep significance to him.
User avatar
#79 - ancano (12/31/2013) [-]
LoTR is not a children's book.... that should be well known. characters in any novel have reasons, even if you cannot see them
#38 - anon (12/31/2013) [-]
Tom didn't limit himself. He chose not to be involved as the only thing he desires is peace for himself.
#6 - Maybe it means Handsome sex. That way your foreskin is still i…  [+] (1 reply) 09/21/2013 on Streaming 0
User avatar
#15 - holycrapimacupcake (09/21/2013) [-]
"kinky-winky"

This a new Teletubbie?