Upload
Login or register

bobfrankenstein

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:6/27/2011
Last Login:7/24/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#17803
Highest Content Rank:#11534
Highest Comment Rank:#6760
Content Thumbs: 44 total,  71 ,  27
Comment Thumbs: 448 total,  583 ,  135
Content Level Progress: 77.96% (46/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 136 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 137 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:5999
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:164
FJ Points:405

latest user's comments

#12 - woah bro thanks friend 23 hours ago on Emos +3
#10 - hey friend can you get this picture much larger without the te…  [+] (2 new replies) 23 hours ago on Emos +2
#12 - bobfrankenstein (23 hours ago) [-]
woah bro thanks friend
#2 - this ***** scarier than morbid 06/14/2016 on near to death 0
#26 - well... graphics out of the way, biplanes ftw, doesnt feel rig…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/08/2016 on What Did You Miss?... 0
User avatar
#28 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I'd rather have playable troops on the ground in War Thunder then a battlefield game, simply because a game like Sniper V2 inside a realistic tank/aircraft simulation would be amazing. But because were never getting that, I guess I can settle on arcade physics. Just not really keen on the idea of troops with the healing factor of Wolverine.
#22 - mhm yeah i was just optimistic  [+] (3 new replies) 05/08/2016 on What Did You Miss?... 0
User avatar
#23 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I used to be like that, and I really want to be again, but unless I see trailers like JC3, where I can see the engine's limitations in trailer itself, I just can't believe the game will be what they tell us it will.
#26 - bobfrankenstein (05/08/2016) [-]
well... graphics out of the way, biplanes ftw, doesnt feel right to fly jets so "slowly"
User avatar
#28 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I'd rather have playable troops on the ground in War Thunder then a battlefield game, simply because a game like Sniper V2 inside a realistic tank/aircraft simulation would be amazing. But because were never getting that, I guess I can settle on arcade physics. Just not really keen on the idea of troops with the healing factor of Wolverine.
#20 - sadly thats true  [+] (5 new replies) 05/08/2016 on What Did You Miss?... 0
User avatar
#21 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I'm not trying to be a dick, but in this day and age of easily post processed footage that can turn Doom to look like Doom 3, I won't trust Any video until I see it played by someone who payed for it, and not payed to play it
#22 - bobfrankenstein (05/08/2016) [-]
mhm yeah i was just optimistic
User avatar
#23 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I used to be like that, and I really want to be again, but unless I see trailers like JC3, where I can see the engine's limitations in trailer itself, I just can't believe the game will be what they tell us it will.
#26 - bobfrankenstein (05/08/2016) [-]
well... graphics out of the way, biplanes ftw, doesnt feel right to fly jets so "slowly"
User avatar
#28 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I'd rather have playable troops on the ground in War Thunder then a battlefield game, simply because a game like Sniper V2 inside a realistic tank/aircraft simulation would be amazing. But because were never getting that, I guess I can settle on arcade physics. Just not really keen on the idea of troops with the healing factor of Wolverine.
#18 - First of all everything is rendered with the ingame engine. …  [+] (13 new replies) 05/08/2016 on What Did You Miss?... 0
#31 - ifightdragons (05/12/2016) [-]
Bottom left corner faggot
User avatar
#19 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
Did you ever even look at the Watch_dogs trailer? Their "in game footage" was nothing like the gameplay, and thats one example.
User avatar
#30 - ifightdragons (05/12/2016) [-]
Same with witcher 3 at e3 sorry you got thumbed down for being right
User avatar
#24 - britbong (05/08/2016) [-]
tbf DICE had already shown they can make a good looking game with Battlefront, now we just have to see if the rest of the game is up to scratch
User avatar
#25 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
You mean Battlefield: Starwars reskin?
User avatar
#27 - britbong (05/08/2016) [-]
Yeah but the graphics were good, though I didn't really care much for the gameplay as a whole
User avatar
#29 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
Graphics were fine, but that's the last thing we cared about in a successor to one of our all time favorite star wars games.
#20 - bobfrankenstein (05/08/2016) [-]
sadly thats true
User avatar
#21 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I'm not trying to be a dick, but in this day and age of easily post processed footage that can turn Doom to look like Doom 3, I won't trust Any video until I see it played by someone who payed for it, and not payed to play it
#22 - bobfrankenstein (05/08/2016) [-]
mhm yeah i was just optimistic
User avatar
#23 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I used to be like that, and I really want to be again, but unless I see trailers like JC3, where I can see the engine's limitations in trailer itself, I just can't believe the game will be what they tell us it will.
#26 - bobfrankenstein (05/08/2016) [-]
well... graphics out of the way, biplanes ftw, doesnt feel right to fly jets so "slowly"
User avatar
#28 - zomaru (05/08/2016) [-]
I'd rather have playable troops on the ground in War Thunder then a battlefield game, simply because a game like Sniper V2 inside a realistic tank/aircraft simulation would be amazing. But because were never getting that, I guess I can settle on arcade physics. Just not really keen on the idea of troops with the healing factor of Wolverine.
#2 - SECOND 04/14/2016 on Mars under magnifying glass -2
#170 - ive never said that lmao youre moving goalposts. What im sayin… 04/10/2016 on Culture comp - wake up... 0
#168 - well youve baited me long enough  [+] (2 new replies) 04/10/2016 on Culture comp - wake up... 0
User avatar
#169 - WutsAtroll (04/10/2016) [-]
if that's your way of saying you realize you've lost the argument, then fine. There's no bait in saying that converts don't stop existing
#170 - bobfrankenstein (04/10/2016) [-]
ive never said that lmao youre moving goalposts. What im saying is you dont have to kill muslims to remove them from the world. just remove islam and muslim stop existing. the people dont though. stop trying to insinuate id like to kill religious people just because i want to kill religion. for fucks sake you suck.
[ 160 Total ]

user's friends