Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

bobbysnobby

Rank #2031 on Comments
no avatar Level 240 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to bobbysnobby Block bobbysnobby Invite bobbysnobby to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/20/2010
Last Login:12/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2031
Highest Content Rank:#25533
Highest Comment Rank:#1679
Content Thumbs: 16 total,  21 ,  5
Comment Thumbs: 4716 total,  5916 ,  1200
Content Level Progress: 33.89% (20/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level 240 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:5033
Total Comments Made:1062
FJ Points:4040

latest user's comments

#43 - Play this in the background 06/17/2014 on DUCK STAMPEDE!!!! -1
#51 - If your stupid enough to think that jumping up and down will p… 06/16/2014 on Sex Myths 0
#80 - "Ah, this is so frustrating. Y'see, this is what I don't… 06/16/2014 on Kill me 0
#76 - I think the more appropriate phrasing would be Chees…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/16/2014 on right into the feels +2
#106 - thewulfman (06/16/2014) [-]
#80 - boomerpyro (06/16/2014) [-]
i only survive.
i stopped living years ago.
#14 - Her writing is funny. Her book the funny thing is was pretty e… 06/16/2014 on dang it ellen +4
#34 - Ask them how they feel about Cheese pizza, chocolate milk, or traps.  [+] (4 new replies) 06/16/2014 on right into the feels +1
#72 - boomerpyro (06/16/2014) [-]
pizza flavored traps that squirt chocolate milk
#76 - bobbysnobby (06/16/2014) [-]
I think the more appropriate phrasing would be

Cheese Pizza traps squirting chocolate milk, But I wont tell you how to live your life.
#106 - thewulfman (06/16/2014) [-]
#80 - boomerpyro (06/16/2014) [-]
i only survive.
i stopped living years ago.
#20 - Comment deleted  [+] (4 new replies) 06/16/2014 on right into the feels 0
#33 - kallesmange (06/16/2014) [-]
It is /b/ you fuckingg pleb! get out
#45 - zachariaseverlivin (06/16/2014) [-]
Pleb indeed
#27 - anonymous (06/16/2014) [-]
At no point did he say /b/ was 4chan

You're not cool because you know the difference between a tragic website and an even more tragic board on it.
#29 - shakalakaboomboom has deleted their comment.
#6 - its like technology improves over time. Lets see how many page… 06/14/2014 on the difference 30 years can... 0
#105 - As amusing as all these were unfortunately the internet alread… 06/14/2014 on put this to music 0
#103 - Comment deleted 06/14/2014 on put this to music 0
#375 - I dont think a government acting under fear is a good thing, I… 06/13/2014 on Edumacation 0
#363 - It is I believe an intentionally inflammatory and a Term with …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/13/2014 on Edumacation 0
#367 - boothead (06/13/2014) [-]
Any weapon ban means the government are scared of us, which is good. but when you stick a thumb in your butt and let it slide they keep making bans and restrictions to the point where your assault musket needs to fail at least 60% of the time and the rest of the bill of rights dies horribly moreso than it has already.
#375 - bobbysnobby (06/13/2014) [-]
I dont think a government acting under fear is a good thing, I also dont think it was passed because the government was "scared" of people owning Assault Weapons. Anyone who wants our government to "Fear" the people has not seen the examples in history of governments which are truly scared of their people.

I agree that you end up with a slippery slope when you put restrictions on anything. I do think that the laws need to be placed somewhere. So the debate is not if or if not civilian weapons should have laws restricting them but where those laws should be.
#360 - Historically I agree with you, but that was written when very …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/13/2014 on Edumacation -1
#422 - anonymous (06/13/2014) [-]
The modern military has less than 1 million members, just a fraction of which are actually combat troops. Meanwhile there are 50-100 million gun owners in the US, if even 10% joined from the conservative estimates that's 5 times larger than the army as a whole and exponentially larger than the combat forces. And that's assuming there are absolutely no defections from the army.

Secondly, illiterate goat farmers have been fucking with the US in Iraq/Afghanistan, some using weapons that date back to WW2, it's completely feasible that 5 million people would put up considerable resistance, especially since the US can't exactly carpet bomb main street or an apartment building on their own soil.

Third bump fire stocks were made to get around ATF bullshit, if it didn't cost 10k to even going through all the full auto paperwork to get a fully automatic gun people wouldn't have to make stuff that requires no paperwork to get around it. The ATF really shot itself in the foot on that one.
#376 - kulamia (06/13/2014) [-]
Okay well with things such as the bump fire stock- yes you have a point. If there was a trade off for firerm bearing rights that would be #1 on my list of things that should go.

But as far as assault weapons features- you and I are on the same page about everything not mattering to the criminal right? I recognize that a 10 round limit COULD stop a criminal who rips one off a law-abiding citizen. But in the same breath I have to point out the Santa Monica shooter in California(AWB territory) used a 60 round magazine and no "bullet button". Anyone scheming to commit a crime will ignore anything in their way.
#315 - The assault weapon ban repeal should be overturned. Its not be…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/13/2014 on Edumacation 0
#342 - kulamia (06/13/2014) [-]
I like that you recognize a bullet fired from say, a Rugger 22 is no different than a bullet fired from an AR-15(both being .223 Rem.)

The thing is thinking on what the Second Amendment stands for- it was not written for home protection or hunting. The entire nation just went through a war against it's former colonizers, AND a much bloodier war against itself. It won out but only because the strength of it's militias was able to overpower Loyalist militias AND bolster its regular army enough to defeat what King George had to throw at the American Colonies. Because of this the founding Fathers deemed it important enough for the US to have strong militias. To fight against foreign invaders, to tear down unjust governments, to REPEL unjust rebellions, AND to stand in place of a standing army which is expensive(the last one has since been thrown out the window, but until WW2 it was still the mindset of the US).

Finally, the idea of an AWB actually stopping crime has been shot down by the CDC. There were some studies done during or directly after it expired which said either "needs more information" or "very little affect", but the CDC concluded last year(the ban expired in 2004) that there was no significant decrease in crime, or firearm related crime. Simply saying "Take off that bayonet lug, your pistol grip, your adjustable stock, unthread your barrel, and minimize your magazine! Okay NOW it's safe and won't harm anyone" Is a ridiculous idea at best.

When people modify their AR-15s to circumvent the law but are still able to fire the same ammunition at the same rate as before that means the AWB is not meant to reduce crime-it's a popularity move "Hey i'm politican X and after that shooting that killed 20 people im SHOWING that I want to stop this" 30 people have been killed in Detroit over the last 2 nights but that doesn't affect them. Not until one person does it with a longarm and gets media attention.
THAT is why I am against another AWB.
#575 - puttman (06/13/2014) [-]
thank you for saying that, ive been saying this for a long time
i feel like people are just uneducated
or to scared to tell the gov. That the guns are there to protect the people from you(the gov.)
#360 - bobbysnobby (06/13/2014) [-]
Historically I agree with you, but that was written when very very few nations even had a professional military most were Militia based military. The modern day united states military will not see real resistance from average citizens sporting Semi Automatic or even Automatic weaponry. The professional military that we see from modern nations including the US and our allies is a far cry from the nations from before the first WW modern militarizes are a totally different beast.

As for the crime rates being effected by the ban, I would not think that it would have much if any effect in the short term. Most of the gun violence is conducted by individuals who are carrying illegally so the ban doesnt directly effect them, at leas in the short term. When I talk about gun activists trying to work around gun laws the example I personally like to use is the Bump Action Stock which was introduced a few years ago. Now its effectiveness aside the purpose of the mechanism was to circumnavigate the laws set in place regarding fire rate. The law was constructed around the firing mechanism and the Bum Stock utilized a semiautomatic mechanism and thus was technically not illegal. To me it shows a underhanded attitude to the law, which tries its best to work around the letter of the law with no regard to the spirit of the law. The law was clearly set in place to restrict the fire rate of civilian firearms not to prevent this automatic feed mechanism.

I distrust the vocal proponents for reasons like that, the culture wants to promote its self at which point its no longer about gun ownership but is about the culture surrounding it. I dont like gun culture, I am pro gun ownership.
#422 - anonymous (06/13/2014) [-]
The modern military has less than 1 million members, just a fraction of which are actually combat troops. Meanwhile there are 50-100 million gun owners in the US, if even 10% joined from the conservative estimates that's 5 times larger than the army as a whole and exponentially larger than the combat forces. And that's assuming there are absolutely no defections from the army.

Secondly, illiterate goat farmers have been fucking with the US in Iraq/Afghanistan, some using weapons that date back to WW2, it's completely feasible that 5 million people would put up considerable resistance, especially since the US can't exactly carpet bomb main street or an apartment building on their own soil.

Third bump fire stocks were made to get around ATF bullshit, if it didn't cost 10k to even going through all the full auto paperwork to get a fully automatic gun people wouldn't have to make stuff that requires no paperwork to get around it. The ATF really shot itself in the foot on that one.
#376 - kulamia (06/13/2014) [-]
Okay well with things such as the bump fire stock- yes you have a point. If there was a trade off for firerm bearing rights that would be #1 on my list of things that should go.

But as far as assault weapons features- you and I are on the same page about everything not mattering to the criminal right? I recognize that a 10 round limit COULD stop a criminal who rips one off a law-abiding citizen. But in the same breath I have to point out the Santa Monica shooter in California(AWB territory) used a 60 round magazine and no "bullet button". Anyone scheming to commit a crime will ignore anything in their way.
#303 - Language is about imparting meaning from one person to another…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/13/2014 on Edumacation +2
#356 - boothead (06/13/2014) [-]
I tried reading your comment. I honestly tried. But no weapon ever had the true purpose of assaulting. So by definition you are wrong, there's no "Assault Rifle". Only sporting rifles, battle rifles and hunting rifles at this point. Also anybody who kills an innocent with any weapon is a bigger pussy than whatever hangs between snookis thighs.
#363 - bobbysnobby (06/13/2014) [-]
It is I believe an intentionally inflammatory and a Term with negative connotations which was used to Cur public favor for the bill. I dont have a preference to the term they choose to use. The point is "Assault Weapon" has several definitions according to state and federal levels of law and it is a legal term. So to that the AR-15 is not an Assault weapon is untrue It was included in the "Assault Weapons Ban" by its explicit series name thus it is an assault weapon.
#367 - boothead (06/13/2014) [-]
Any weapon ban means the government are scared of us, which is good. but when you stick a thumb in your butt and let it slide they keep making bans and restrictions to the point where your assault musket needs to fail at least 60% of the time and the rest of the bill of rights dies horribly moreso than it has already.
#375 - bobbysnobby (06/13/2014) [-]
I dont think a government acting under fear is a good thing, I also dont think it was passed because the government was "scared" of people owning Assault Weapons. Anyone who wants our government to "Fear" the people has not seen the examples in history of governments which are truly scared of their people.

I agree that you end up with a slippery slope when you put restrictions on anything. I do think that the laws need to be placed somewhere. So the debate is not if or if not civilian weapons should have laws restricting them but where those laws should be.
#28 - Its not like the military needs to go out of its way for cheap…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/12/2014 on aiming with google glasses +34
User avatar #37 - usarmyexplain (06/12/2014) [-]
It's really getting cut. Not the multi billion dollar defense projects that rarely work as advertised, but I guarantee the mirror for your acog budget was first to get cut.
User avatar #166 - yuukoku (06/12/2014) [-]
I'm sure we'd do just as well with 10% off the military budget. That's a lot of money.
#109 - People get caught up in the debates about which is better. I d… 06/11/2014 on GTA announced For PC 0
#118 - I want a live action pokemon movie with Danny Davito playing e…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/11/2014 on This needs to be in a... +11
User avatar #134 - gmarrox (06/11/2014) [-]
I admit I'm reasonably stoned, so maybe it's a bit augmented, but that mental image may be the funniest thing to ever grace the under-utilized cavity that is my mind.
#55 - We have back problems because our spine sucks for upright anim…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/10/2014 on look at his stubby little... -3
User avatar #60 - penileburglar (06/10/2014) [-]
Okay. When did anyone say that animals weren't selected for? You're so eager to flaunt your wikipedia knowledge that you didn't even read the post. No one said selective breeding itself was cruel, no one said that animals 'live in a vacuum and never change.' Just that breeding an animal to have horrible health problems--where sometimes as little as 1 in 10 survive andt he ones that survive are almost guaranteed to ahve back problems--is incredible cruel, especially just for the sake of aesthetics.

#334 - Sorta relevant Just remember Like racism &… 06/10/2014 on Avocados are so hard to eat... 0
#140 - We cant the ******* racist polititians dont want …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2014 on Armin x Female Titan 0
User avatar #141 - animedudej (06/08/2014) [-]
are you saying you guys cant re-elect zombie lincold for when the zombie apocalypse hits?!
#6 - "I'm not a crook" 06/08/2014 on Lol +1
#111 - How do you not know and love the Reagan? He was the scariest p…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/08/2014 on Armin x Female Titan +1
User avatar #138 - animedudej (06/08/2014) [-]
i'd vote zombie reagan every time... change the law so he could get infinitely re-elected...


i'm Norwegian... so thats too bad
#140 - bobbysnobby (06/08/2014) [-]
We cant the fucking racist polititians dont want to us the people to elect dead presidents.
User avatar #141 - animedudej (06/08/2014) [-]
are you saying you guys cant re-elect zombie lincold for when the zombie apocalypse hits?!
#66 - well think what you want I think your in some sort of insane m… 06/05/2014 on zelda arguement -3
#53 - Skyward sword is clearly the best because you can fly. Changin…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/05/2014 on zelda arguement 0
#56 - alexandrz (06/05/2014) [-]
What part of 'I don't give a fuck what you think' aren't you understanding?
Also, wolves are badass. I refuse to let any magnitude of faggots change that fact.
#66 - bobbysnobby (06/05/2014) [-]
well think what you want I think your in some sort of insane minority. Wolves are bad ass but Link could not feel less like a wolf when he becomes one, he isnt feral in his combat system, he cant even pounce on enemies who have fallen down. It would feel a lot better as a wolf to attack people when they fall down instead you wait around for them to stand back up. The order most people would put 3d zeldas would prob be.
majoras
OOT
WindWaker
Twilight Princess
Skyward Sword
Thats not to say they are objectively right but Twilight Princess and Skyward sword are not up to par. I didnt play any Nintendo 64 titles until i was an adult my first system was ps2 and gamecube but even I could see that Twilight Princess is basically fan service for people who played OOT.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 160 / Total items point value: 1820

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)