Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

blobbo

Rank #28902 on Comments
no avatar Level 24 Comments: Peasant
Offline
Send mail to blobbo Block blobbo Invite blobbo to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:2/13/2011
Last Login:12/18/2014
Location:Italy
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#28902
Highest Comment Rank:#12348
Comment Thumbs: 94 total,  233 ,  139
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 24 Comments: Peasant → Level 25 Comments: Peasant
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:132
FJ Points:74

latest user's comments

#202 - It will be done, I trust you Iron Man! 06/14/2013 on Obongo +1
#200 - I think tried to use irony...  [+] (2 new replies) 06/14/2013 on Obongo 0
#201 - jibbablabba (06/14/2013) [-]
shhhh, don't defend the anon. just smile and back away. have a nice day
#202 - blobbo (06/14/2013) [-]
It will be done, I trust you Iron Man!
#149 - Also Europe was build by slaves. How would you call miners dur… 06/13/2013 on Deeply Philosophical 0
#53 - *options 06/11/2013 on Deeply Philosophical -2
#52 - Two oprions: - change soldiers with slaves; - change c…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/11/2013 on Deeply Philosophical 0
#86 - anonymous (06/11/2013) [-]
Why Slaves?..You are presumably thinking that the landscape pictured is somewhere in america? but it could just aswell be in europe, where the use of slaves was very limited..
#149 - blobbo (06/13/2013) [-]
Also Europe was build by slaves. How would you call miners during the industrial revolution?
#53 - blobbo (06/11/2013) [-]
*options
#122 - *It should be 12,5% instead of 10%, my mistake... 04/19/2013 on A tale 0
#121 - HUGE problem: as I already said the total can NOT be more than…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/19/2013 on A tale 0
#122 - blobbo (04/19/2013) [-]
*It should be 12,5% instead of 10%, my mistake...
#25 - Ravioli con ricotta e funghi porcini... Hilarious! 04/18/2013 on Cacca macchia 0
#119 - Well, in this case the child should count half as hispanic and…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/18/2013 on A tale 0
#120 - cuboid (04/18/2013) [-]
Let's say I am holding a mock census in school and I have 100 people in a room. There are 45 white kids, 20 black kids, 10 asians, 15 mexicans, and 10 kids that are "other". That means that the room is 45% white, 20% black, 10% asian, and 15% mexican (90% of the total). Now we want to find what ethnicity the 10% "other" is. They have 5 white-black kids (5%), 3 asian-mexicans (3%), and 2 black-mexicans (2%). So we add 5% to the white and black (50% white, 25% black), add 3% to asian and mexicans (13% asian,18% mexican), and add 2% to black and mexicans (27% black, 20% mexican). That means we have 50% white, 27% black, 13% asian, and 20% mexican which is a total of 110%.
Problem?
#121 - blobbo (04/19/2013) [-]
HUGE problem: as I already said the total can NOT be more than 100% (it's math, not some wimpy dimpy shit)... If 5% of kids are white-black then it will be added 2,5% to white and 2,5% to black!! Otherwise the statistics would mean nothing... I'll make an example to make it clear.
In a class there are 5 kids:
- 4 are caucasian;
- 1 has Parent1 who is black-hispanic and Parent2 who is asian-slavic so the child will be a super black-hispanic-asian-slavic combo.
With your logic you would say that only 50% of the kids are caucasian while the other 50% is composed of 10% black, 10% hispanic, 10% asian and 10% slavic kids... But in reality 80% (4/5) of the kids are white!!
I hope this helped :)
#122 - blobbo (04/19/2013) [-]
*It should be 12,5% instead of 10%, my mistake...
#86 - Damn, Chicago has over 100% of population... I'm not gonna say…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/16/2013 on A tale +1
#102 - cuboid (04/16/2013) [-]
When the government does the census people fill in the bubbles saying what ethnicity they are. If someone happens to have parents of different ethnicity they can fill in two or more bubbles. For example: Parent1 is Black and Parent2 is Hispanic, therefor, Child1 is Black and Hispanic. Child1 will now have to fill in Hispanic and African-American into their census.
#119 - blobbo (04/18/2013) [-]
Well, in this case the child should count half as hispanic and half as black. Math doesn't allow this kind of shit...
#120 - cuboid (04/18/2013) [-]
Let's say I am holding a mock census in school and I have 100 people in a room. There are 45 white kids, 20 black kids, 10 asians, 15 mexicans, and 10 kids that are "other". That means that the room is 45% white, 20% black, 10% asian, and 15% mexican (90% of the total). Now we want to find what ethnicity the 10% "other" is. They have 5 white-black kids (5%), 3 asian-mexicans (3%), and 2 black-mexicans (2%). So we add 5% to the white and black (50% white, 25% black), add 3% to asian and mexicans (13% asian,18% mexican), and add 2% to black and mexicans (27% black, 20% mexican). That means we have 50% white, 27% black, 13% asian, and 20% mexican which is a total of 110%.
Problem?
#121 - blobbo (04/19/2013) [-]
HUGE problem: as I already said the total can NOT be more than 100% (it's math, not some wimpy dimpy shit)... If 5% of kids are white-black then it will be added 2,5% to white and 2,5% to black!! Otherwise the statistics would mean nothing... I'll make an example to make it clear.
In a class there are 5 kids:
- 4 are caucasian;
- 1 has Parent1 who is black-hispanic and Parent2 who is asian-slavic so the child will be a super black-hispanic-asian-slavic combo.
With your logic you would say that only 50% of the kids are caucasian while the other 50% is composed of 10% black, 10% hispanic, 10% asian and 10% slavic kids... But in reality 80% (4/5) of the kids are white!!
I hope this helped :)
#122 - blobbo (04/19/2013) [-]
*It should be 12,5% instead of 10%, my mistake...
#168 - Airplanes don't fly. People fly. But without airplanes it… 04/02/2013 on guns don't kill 0
#481 - Having your opinion is ok, but you should know that you'll be … 03/28/2013 on on my newsfeed today +1
#339 - Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at a… 01/31/2013 on guns 0
#333 - 1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't … 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#329 - 1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordin…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#327 - 1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's r…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#324 - 1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7…  [+] (8 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#320 - That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass …  [+] (11 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#322 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his shit as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#317 - Wow, great arguments! So in all those mass shootings the probl…  [+] (13 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#318 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Columbine happened during the last assault weapons ban, guess what? He just brought a shitload of 10 round magazines.
People have shrugged of shotgun slugs before, people aren't just going to stop because you shoot them.
Again the assault weapons BAN, I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others, not choose from some arbitrary list people in gated communities gave me.
He's not going to just turn his back while you fire at him, he's going to fight back.
And SEVEN OR MORE boars, it takes more than 1 shot to down one of their younglings. Their instincts are to charge when threatened, not to run away.
#320 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass shootings there was no one who standed there trying to kill the madman even if there was no restriction on the number of bullets one could fire in a round from his self-defense fireweapon, so your reasoning doesn't really work...
I want to buy a bunch of granades and a bazooka for my self defence, but my government won't let me buy them... They're so evil!!!
If he CAN run away he'll surely do it, he's not going to think "considering i'm in a field thant my enemy knows very well, i still have some possibility to kill him before he kills me so i'll try to do it!"
So hunters what usually use? shotguns or AK-47?? Damn...
#322 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his shit as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#312 - 1. I said you can't kill more that 7 people with 7 bullets, no…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/30/2013 on guns -3
#314 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
It's like you didn't even read it.
1 shot doesn't mean they stop or go down.
Replied to that below.
Depends on what you mean by trained.
#310 - I'm sure the average person will not ever be involved in a Ram…  [+] (15 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns -2
#313 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
A violent situation, like those mass shootings that happen every other month or a break in.
And what happens if you can't run away? Crawl in the corner and beg for your life or just let people die, real nice.
And again, in a high intensity situation like a break in you're not gonna be shooting dead on, and even if you do hit him it doesn't guarantee he just stops.
And you've obviously never hunted boar, where packs of 7+ can charge at you on a dime.
#317 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Wow, great arguments! So in all those mass shootings the problem was not that the mad person could fire how much he wanted WITHOUT having to reload, the issue here is be that in the remote case that you had a gun and couldn't run away you would have ONLY 7 bullets to take him down... That's truly twisted :|
I never said that you should crawl in the corner and beg because funcking CONTROL doesn't mean fucking BAN!!! So you can still have your gun for protection.
Do you think that a burglar would risk his life or that he would run away if you started shooting at him? He is a burglar, not a top elite russian assassin engaged to kill you.
I didn't knew you were a hunter!! And what do boars do when you shoot at them 7 times? Please send a pic of your preys!!
#318 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Columbine happened during the last assault weapons ban, guess what? He just brought a shitload of 10 round magazines.
People have shrugged of shotgun slugs before, people aren't just going to stop because you shoot them.
Again the assault weapons BAN, I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others, not choose from some arbitrary list people in gated communities gave me.
He's not going to just turn his back while you fire at him, he's going to fight back.
And SEVEN OR MORE boars, it takes more than 1 shot to down one of their younglings. Their instincts are to charge when threatened, not to run away.
#320 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass shootings there was no one who standed there trying to kill the madman even if there was no restriction on the number of bullets one could fire in a round from his self-defense fireweapon, so your reasoning doesn't really work...
I want to buy a bunch of granades and a bazooka for my self defence, but my government won't let me buy them... They're so evil!!!
If he CAN run away he'll surely do it, he's not going to think "considering i'm in a field thant my enemy knows very well, i still have some possibility to kill him before he kills me so i'll try to do it!"
So hunters what usually use? shotguns or AK-47?? Damn...
#322 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his shit as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#306 - Oh, and I never implied none of the 3 thing that you said...  [+] (3 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#308 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people at a time.-Implication 1.
then I'll have to reload to kill again.- Implication 2 and 3.
#312 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I said you can't kill more that 7 people with 7 bullets, not that you'll surely do it.
2. Already answered that below (only hunting is a socially useful activity for guns, and you don't need more that 7 bullets at a time).
3. Already answered that below (a person who is not sufficently trained should not be able to buy a gun).
#314 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
It's like you didn't even read it.
1 shot doesn't mean they stop or go down.
Replied to that below.
Depends on what you mean by trained.
#305 - Implying that you absolutely want to kill, to scare is not eno…  [+] (17 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#307 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying you MIGHT scare the assailant off.
Implying you'd be able to switch between guns quickly enough.
1.And I'm talking about reloading quickly during some violent incident, which even law enforcement officers have trouble with.
2.Hunting is extremely useful, no reason to omit that for some arbitrary reason
#310 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
I'm sure the average person will not ever be involved in a Rambo like situation, tell me what you imagine when you say "some violent incident". If you are not a police officer the best thing to do is run away from who shots, so there's no need to stop and pretend you're in the Far West.
If some burglar breaks into your house i'm sure that you won't need more than 7 shots to scare, hurt or kill them, it's not like they come in groups of hundreds, you're not a movie hero...
I never said that hunting isn't useful, but i'm quite sure they don't need more than 7 bullets in a round to hunt ===> No problem
#313 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
A violent situation, like those mass shootings that happen every other month or a break in.
And what happens if you can't run away? Crawl in the corner and beg for your life or just let people die, real nice.
And again, in a high intensity situation like a break in you're not gonna be shooting dead on, and even if you do hit him it doesn't guarantee he just stops.
And you've obviously never hunted boar, where packs of 7+ can charge at you on a dime.
#317 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Wow, great arguments! So in all those mass shootings the problem was not that the mad person could fire how much he wanted WITHOUT having to reload, the issue here is be that in the remote case that you had a gun and couldn't run away you would have ONLY 7 bullets to take him down... That's truly twisted :|
I never said that you should crawl in the corner and beg because funcking CONTROL doesn't mean fucking BAN!!! So you can still have your gun for protection.
Do you think that a burglar would risk his life or that he would run away if you started shooting at him? He is a burglar, not a top elite russian assassin engaged to kill you.
I didn't knew you were a hunter!! And what do boars do when you shoot at them 7 times? Please send a pic of your preys!!
#318 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Columbine happened during the last assault weapons ban, guess what? He just brought a shitload of 10 round magazines.
People have shrugged of shotgun slugs before, people aren't just going to stop because you shoot them.
Again the assault weapons BAN, I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others, not choose from some arbitrary list people in gated communities gave me.
He's not going to just turn his back while you fire at him, he's going to fight back.
And SEVEN OR MORE boars, it takes more than 1 shot to down one of their younglings. Their instincts are to charge when threatened, not to run away.
#320 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass shootings there was no one who standed there trying to kill the madman even if there was no restriction on the number of bullets one could fire in a round from his self-defense fireweapon, so your reasoning doesn't really work...
I want to buy a bunch of granades and a bazooka for my self defence, but my government won't let me buy them... They're so evil!!!
If he CAN run away he'll surely do it, he's not going to think "considering i'm in a field thant my enemy knows very well, i still have some possibility to kill him before he kills me so i'll try to do it!"
So hunters what usually use? shotguns or AK-47?? Damn...
#322 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his shit as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#302 - That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people a…  [+] (23 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#303 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying 1 round equals one kill.
Implying people solely use guns for killing people.
Implying you'd be able to reload quickly under a high stress situation.
#306 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Oh, and I never implied none of the 3 thing that you said...
#308 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people at a time.-Implication 1.
then I'll have to reload to kill again.- Implication 2 and 3.
#312 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I said you can't kill more that 7 people with 7 bullets, not that you'll surely do it.
2. Already answered that below (only hunting is a socially useful activity for guns, and you don't need more that 7 bullets at a time).
3. Already answered that below (a person who is not sufficently trained should not be able to buy a gun).
#314 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
It's like you didn't even read it.
1 shot doesn't mean they stop or go down.
Replied to that below.
Depends on what you mean by trained.
#305 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying that you absolutely want to kill, to scare is not enough.
Implying that guns can do something ELSE than kill (yeah, i know, hunting and sport... something actually useful and that isn't done only by hunters?).
Implying that: 1) you can't buy more than one gun to have more bullets.
2) a person who can't reload (who is not sufficently trained) should be able to buy a gun.
#307 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying you MIGHT scare the assailant off.
Implying you'd be able to switch between guns quickly enough.
1.And I'm talking about reloading quickly during some violent incident, which even law enforcement officers have trouble with.
2.Hunting is extremely useful, no reason to omit that for some arbitrary reason
#310 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
I'm sure the average person will not ever be involved in a Rambo like situation, tell me what you imagine when you say "some violent incident". If you are not a police officer the best thing to do is run away from who shots, so there's no need to stop and pretend you're in the Far West.
If some burglar breaks into your house i'm sure that you won't need more than 7 shots to scare, hurt or kill them, it's not like they come in groups of hundreds, you're not a movie hero...
I never said that hunting isn't useful, but i'm quite sure they don't need more than 7 bullets in a round to hunt ===> No problem
#313 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
A violent situation, like those mass shootings that happen every other month or a break in.
And what happens if you can't run away? Crawl in the corner and beg for your life or just let people die, real nice.
And again, in a high intensity situation like a break in you're not gonna be shooting dead on, and even if you do hit him it doesn't guarantee he just stops.
And you've obviously never hunted boar, where packs of 7+ can charge at you on a dime.
#317 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Wow, great arguments! So in all those mass shootings the problem was not that the mad person could fire how much he wanted WITHOUT having to reload, the issue here is be that in the remote case that you had a gun and couldn't run away you would have ONLY 7 bullets to take him down... That's truly twisted :|
I never said that you should crawl in the corner and beg because funcking CONTROL doesn't mean fucking BAN!!! So you can still have your gun for protection.
Do you think that a burglar would risk his life or that he would run away if you started shooting at him? He is a burglar, not a top elite russian assassin engaged to kill you.
I didn't knew you were a hunter!! And what do boars do when you shoot at them 7 times? Please send a pic of your preys!!
#318 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Columbine happened during the last assault weapons ban, guess what? He just brought a shitload of 10 round magazines.
People have shrugged of shotgun slugs before, people aren't just going to stop because you shoot them.
Again the assault weapons BAN, I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others, not choose from some arbitrary list people in gated communities gave me.
He's not going to just turn his back while you fire at him, he's going to fight back.
And SEVEN OR MORE boars, it takes more than 1 shot to down one of their younglings. Their instincts are to charge when threatened, not to run away.
#320 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass shootings there was no one who standed there trying to kill the madman even if there was no restriction on the number of bullets one could fire in a round from his self-defense fireweapon, so your reasoning doesn't really work...
I want to buy a bunch of granades and a bazooka for my self defence, but my government won't let me buy them... They're so evil!!!
If he CAN run away he'll surely do it, he's not going to think "considering i'm in a field thant my enemy knows very well, i still have some possibility to kill him before he kills me so i'll try to do it!"
So hunters what usually use? shotguns or AK-47?? Damn...
#322 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his shit as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#299 - Damn, I tought that in the one in the image was a gun, i must …  [+] (25 new replies) 01/30/2013 on guns 0
#300 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And if it has more than 7 rounds it would be banned.
#302 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people at a time, then I'll have to reload to kill again...
#303 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying 1 round equals one kill.
Implying people solely use guns for killing people.
Implying you'd be able to reload quickly under a high stress situation.
#306 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Oh, and I never implied none of the 3 thing that you said...
#308 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people at a time.-Implication 1.
then I'll have to reload to kill again.- Implication 2 and 3.
#312 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I said you can't kill more that 7 people with 7 bullets, not that you'll surely do it.
2. Already answered that below (only hunting is a socially useful activity for guns, and you don't need more that 7 bullets at a time).
3. Already answered that below (a person who is not sufficently trained should not be able to buy a gun).
#314 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
It's like you didn't even read it.
1 shot doesn't mean they stop or go down.
Replied to that below.
Depends on what you mean by trained.
#305 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying that you absolutely want to kill, to scare is not enough.
Implying that guns can do something ELSE than kill (yeah, i know, hunting and sport... something actually useful and that isn't done only by hunters?).
Implying that: 1) you can't buy more than one gun to have more bullets.
2) a person who can't reload (who is not sufficently trained) should be able to buy a gun.
#307 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Implying you MIGHT scare the assailant off.
Implying you'd be able to switch between guns quickly enough.
1.And I'm talking about reloading quickly during some violent incident, which even law enforcement officers have trouble with.
2.Hunting is extremely useful, no reason to omit that for some arbitrary reason
#310 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
I'm sure the average person will not ever be involved in a Rambo like situation, tell me what you imagine when you say "some violent incident". If you are not a police officer the best thing to do is run away from who shots, so there's no need to stop and pretend you're in the Far West.
If some burglar breaks into your house i'm sure that you won't need more than 7 shots to scare, hurt or kill them, it's not like they come in groups of hundreds, you're not a movie hero...
I never said that hunting isn't useful, but i'm quite sure they don't need more than 7 bullets in a round to hunt ===> No problem
#313 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
A violent situation, like those mass shootings that happen every other month or a break in.
And what happens if you can't run away? Crawl in the corner and beg for your life or just let people die, real nice.
And again, in a high intensity situation like a break in you're not gonna be shooting dead on, and even if you do hit him it doesn't guarantee he just stops.
And you've obviously never hunted boar, where packs of 7+ can charge at you on a dime.
#317 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
Wow, great arguments! So in all those mass shootings the problem was not that the mad person could fire how much he wanted WITHOUT having to reload, the issue here is be that in the remote case that you had a gun and couldn't run away you would have ONLY 7 bullets to take him down... That's truly twisted :|
I never said that you should crawl in the corner and beg because funcking CONTROL doesn't mean fucking BAN!!! So you can still have your gun for protection.
Do you think that a burglar would risk his life or that he would run away if you started shooting at him? He is a burglar, not a top elite russian assassin engaged to kill you.
I didn't knew you were a hunter!! And what do boars do when you shoot at them 7 times? Please send a pic of your preys!!
#318 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
Columbine happened during the last assault weapons ban, guess what? He just brought a shitload of 10 round magazines.
People have shrugged of shotgun slugs before, people aren't just going to stop because you shoot them.
Again the assault weapons BAN, I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others, not choose from some arbitrary list people in gated communities gave me.
He's not going to just turn his back while you fire at him, he's going to fight back.
And SEVEN OR MORE boars, it takes more than 1 shot to down one of their younglings. Their instincts are to charge when threatened, not to run away.
#320 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass shootings there was no one who standed there trying to kill the madman even if there was no restriction on the number of bullets one could fire in a round from his self-defense fireweapon, so your reasoning doesn't really work...
I want to buy a bunch of granades and a bazooka for my self defence, but my government won't let me buy them... They're so evil!!!
If he CAN run away he'll surely do it, he's not going to think "considering i'm in a field thant my enemy knows very well, i still have some possibility to kill him before he kills me so i'll try to do it!"
So hunters what usually use? shotguns or AK-47?? Damn...
#322 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his shit as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 - blobbo (01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested shithole and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
[ 109 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)